Mary Poppins Returns - FanScription Podcast
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
- Doug talks with Walter about his alterations to Mary Poppins Returns and how these changes could have helped this sequel stay closer to the Disney classic.
Watch the episode here - • What if Mary Poppins R...
Mary Poppins Returns is a 2018 American musical fantasy film directed by Rob Marshall, with a screenplay written by David Magee and a story by Magee, Marshall, and John DeLuca. Based on the book series Mary Poppins by P. L. Travers, the film is a sequel to the 1964 film Mary Poppins, and stars Emily Blunt as Mary Poppins, with Lin-Manuel Miranda, Ben Whishaw, Emily Mortimer, Julie Walters, Dick Van Dyke, Angela Lansbury, Colin Firth, and Meryl Streep in supporting roles.
Go to our Store for Awesome Stuff - theawesomestor...
Get some Nostalgia Critic T-Shirts here - shrsl.com/?~96c0
See more at our Site: channelawesome.com
Facebook: / channelawesome
Twitter: / channelawesome
Instagram: / channelawesome
Like Doug on Facebook: / 127127037353766
The ONLY Official TH-cam channel for the Nostalgia Critic and Channel Awesome.
New Nostalgia Critic episodes every Wednesday at 5PM CST.
New Top 5 Best/Worst every Tuesday at 5PM CST
New Real Thoughts or 1st Viewing episodes every Thursday at 5PM CST.
New Tamara's Never Seen every Friday at 5PM CST.
Classic Nostalgia Critic episodes are uploaded after they are cleared. TV Show Vlogs are uploaded on an inconsistent schedule, so check the playlists. Same with Doug Reviews, Sibling Rivalry, and Bum Reviews.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 78 | คู่เอก "ปกรณ์ vs ฟาบิโอ"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LSOmgl0Th2c/mqdefault.jpg)
What did everyone think of Doug's alterations to Mary Poppins Returns?
Watch the episode here - th-cam.com/video/Sie0GJKy2ho/w-d-xo.html
Could you do a video on deep blue sea at all?
Well, we regret that he felt that way.
Channel Awesome Hard to say. I don’t think this sequel should have been made in the first place. But since this episode wouldn’t exist otherwise, I have to give major props to Doug for pouring his love of the Original- and, in my opinion, *THE ONLY-* Mary Poppins into this FanScription Podcast. You can absolutely tell this was a labor of love!
I agreed wholeheartedly. The movie had all the right talent and effort to make it work, but it needed a much better story to hold it all together.
I think we need a Chitty Chitty Bang Bang Sequel-boot
40 minutes of Doug and Walter?
Time to grab some popcorn
Rawan H ;)
*_I'm really glad the director tried to stick up with traditional animation instead of CGI. Those executives really got what they deserved._*
But the chart says--
*grabs the chart and destorys it then burns it then buries it then dances on the grave*
FUCK THE CHART
Here’s something I wish Doug had brought up that bothered me about the movie:
when MP returns, J and M say she looks the same and hasn’t aged. Then immediately question if their adventures in the first film were real...WHY!?!?!?!?!? You just said she hasn’t aged!!! Why would you question what happened to you!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Paul Rudd
I think Annabelle’s tendencies to act like a mom is an effect of losing hers
You should rename Fanscription "THERE! ...I FIXED THE MOVIE!"
3a Artistries More like fucked it up because Doug is way too obsessed with the first Mary Poppins movie and needs to except the fact that Mary Poppins Returns is officially a good movie, not as perfect as the first, but still good.
I felt that way about Rob's Fanscription on the movie adaptation of _The Haunted Mansion._
Rogue the L.I-Princess You talking about me?
@@AlexMcGillvrey No I meant Rob Walker's Fanscription, sorry for any confusion.
Here is where I stand on the Mary Poppins stuff.
I think they either should have chosen one of the other Mary Poppins books to recreate, "Yes there were others and they were quite successful and interesting.." OR they should have went the trippy dark route and just had Guillermo del Toro go the Pan's Labyrinth route with it and bring out the twisted side as far as they could go. After all there were plenty of scenes that to me could have had a darker side, even the parrot head on the stick seemed to be resisting its existence at times. Maybe it would have been better to make it PG-13 and go as close to R as possible spending more time in the paintings than before.
*I'M MARY POPPINS Y'ALL!* R.I.P Yondu.
Was he cool?
Now I'm crying again...
When I saw it I said In my mind "oh no its going to be everywere"
I hated that
4:25 P.L. Travers died in 1996 at the age of 96. Oh that creepy feeling when you realize that the '90s are almost three decades ago. And '70s are not twenty years ago anymore.
mmm Hmm
I'm just glad we can bingewatch both films and Saving Mr Banks on Disney+
"The cover is not the book , so open it up and take a look "
I know a man with a wooden leg named Smith.
What’s the name of his other leg?
😂😂😂😂😂😂
I’ve never seen anyone as infatuated with Mary Poppins as Doug Walker is and I absolutely love that!
Not only have my Brother and I seen it countless times, but we used to have a record with all the songs from the movie. We listened to it constantly! Since Doug already expressed everything that is magical and spectacular about Mary Poppins- especially the phenomenal climax- I don’t have to add anything.
The original is already practically perfect in every way. Fair play to anyone who saw and enjoyed the sequel, but it wasn’t necessary.
Please do a FanScription for Season 8 of Game of Thrones!
I would LOVE to see your version of “Trip a Little Light Fantastic”!
doug making a mary poppins video: i want to review this sequels because it piss me off the potential that it could have because i love the original so much and most people don't realize that because theres people that don't want to think that even kids film can have mature and timeless themes that even adults can enjoy.
viewers: oh doug you are exaggerate things and enjoy what you have
any average youtber making a video about game of thrones: everyone is hating on the last season so we will make a shit ton of clickbait rant videos shitting on it to earn a lot of viewers to make our channels grow like corporate sluts, even if we don't give a shit about game of thrones and we are doing this to get attetion from the trent.
viewers: DAMM FUCKING RIGHT THAT SEASON WAS THE WORSE AND EVERYBODY MUST HATE IT IN EVERY SINGLE DETAIL AND EVERYBODY THAT MADE THAT SHIT SHOULD BE HARASSED IN SOCIAL MEDIA!!
Moral of the story: if you are so busy beeing "unique" than beeing yourself, you ended up beeing like everyone else doing the same thing
Doug Walker: My favorite Italian-American TH-camr.
Oh gosh it was kind of still recent but I give major props for the musical
I remember seeing the promos for this movie and I didn't care much for the film. After seeing Doug's review, first viewing and now this...glad I didn't watch it 😂
I do agree it had great ideas and moments in there but they were never fully explored. Just sort of beat for beat retelling
Are planning to do fan scrips of either The Jungle Book or Maleficent ?
I am looking forward to Pixar's Onward, who else :)
Same here🐲
6:42 to me the answer to that question is arrogance.
You have some writer that decides to give their own vision, their own personal fanfiction about how the story continues, arrogantly refusing to even acknowledge the existance of previous continuations to the source material.
When you think about it this happens all the time, and usually with awful results: the Star Wars sequels and how they ignored the expanded universe; Son of the Mask ignoring that the story moved beyond Stanley Ipkiss in the comics; Terminator sequels doing the same story of machines trying to kill Sarah/John Connor over and over again ignoring that in comics and video games various interesting facets of the universe were explored; Fant4stic ignoring *everything* about the Fantastic Four beside the basic premise shown in the 2005 movie... and I could go on.
I dunno if I would chalk all of that up to arrogance. I mean, "Star Wars" and lots of other popular franchises oftentimes have so much material that it would take years for some writer to take all of those details into account, and it could also put a limit on their creativity. Some writers prefer to base their work off of what comes easiest for them to comprehend and/or sympathize.
I doubt a single acknowledgment of the old Expanded Universe lore would've made any of the newer movies any better.
@@geoffreyrichards6079 I'm not saying they should have referenced the EU, I'm saying they should have adapted the best stories from it instead of making new, crappy ones. These stories are the laziest most by-the-numbers attempts of continuing the story; there's no risk of limiting the creativity when there's no creativity to begin with. They should have had the umility of checking what the comics or videogames (or in this case other books) have to offer before assuming their own version would be better by default.
@@KombatGod That's the thing though, why is that creative decision labeled as 'arrogance'? I mean, plenty of fans disliked the prequel trilogy, but its canonical status didn't prevent them from making their own reinterpretations. Is that a sign of arrogance? Likewise, some people don't agree with the choices the authors of their favorite books made - whether it be J.K. Rowling's bizarre retcons or Sir Conan Doyle resurrecting his famous detective. Writers are free to have their own takes on the material presented to them.
@@KombatGod Heck, what about the times when Lucas himself retconned established elements from the EU when he was writing the prequels? He wasn't bound by the lore other authors added.
@@geoffreyrichards6079 it's arrogance because it's ignoring previous works assuming your own creations are going to be better by default. The example you mentioned about people rewriting stories from the prequels is quite the opposite, because it's paying homage to the original works by aknowledging the good things in them but adding something new and trying to improve them.
That's what they did at Marvel too: after the success of one movir they didn't make up new adventures for the heroes, they looked at the stories from the comics picking up the best and most memorable ones, and adapted them trying to improve them when possible.
Gee, if only P.L Travers were alive today, I wonder what she would say about Saving Mr. Banks
5:38-5:48 Doug's comment on Dick Van Dyke never dancing before Mary Poppins isn't true because he was a part of the original production of Bye Bye Birdie in 1960, where his character Albert Peterson dances with one of the members of the Conrad Birdie fan club during "Put on a Happy Face".
And the accent, event he apologised it but He so much fun in that movie
YOU GUYS NEED TO REVIEW THE LAST MIMZY!!!!!!!!!!!! JUST TRUST ME!!!!!!!!!!!
I remember that movie, it was weeeeeeeird.
Only 12-year-olds would say the politics of Star Wars: Phantom Menace was sound, after Queen Amadala said something like "I will not choose a course of action that will lead to war" right after invasion and coersion was confirmed. Isn't that like assuming peace with a galactic North Korea, Padme?
You guys make me wishes your fanscription to be made even more now,sadly that's never gonna happen
Nice podcast 🙂👍
At 26:08 The Correct Answer is "A Spoon Full of Sugar" ...
The best movies when it comes to a sequel was proven the smart move with Iron Man. The proven position is that the same actor can push the movie to a higher value. Not in money although that does come with it. For me using the same actor you see how they explore there character and what they bring with there own personality. Iron Man proved this was a very key value in movies. Batman using Christian Bale each movie sales increased. Yet the second they change the actor the sales starts low. Marvel crushing the box office proven star power of using the same actors has a lot of value. Billions to be exact. Talking the number one movie in history. The same actors growing and learning and seeing how they go about there changes through out there events shows added character. The moment you switch the actor in mid stride drops the value and things start all over. Same with NASA. The moment a new government is in place the direction changes and they can't seem to figure out what there doing. One year there going to the moon next there going to mars then the next they don't know what there doing. With Mary Poppins there does not seen to be a way to bring this classic to what is today with out messing it up. To really fix it they would have to change the entire direction. Why not have something happen in another country? There was many areas they could have gone and done even the book idea you brought up yet they seem to have done flat in there abilities to work this out. Disney is doing in my view to much attempting to manage everything and truth is there limits are only human.
I think I watched Mary Poppins at the wrong time (that kinda preteen edgy "I hate pink and ~kids movies~" phase, though I appreciate it now) but I do still love Doug gushing about it.
Disney: Break what wasn't broken
You mean "fix what wasn't broken?"
Nostalgia Critic, you better not delay reviewing Road Chip. All of your viewers and subscribers have their eyes on you.
what's wrong with you people? Do you hate Doug? Do you wanna torture him that much? you trying to kill him through s#!tty movies
DeathKnightofAnime We all hate the movie, therefore we want Nostalgia Critic to review that film, so that we can share with him our feelings of anger and frustration.
@@ekmalsukarno2302I guess but after the first three I just worry road chip might send him truly over the edge
DeathKnightofAnime Truth be told, I just want Nostalgia Critic to review Road Chip because I want to hear what he has to say about Kimberly Williams, one of the main cast members of the film.
Simply make a marry poppins tv like the books, you know netflix did that with a seires of unfortunate events
Review The 2012 Three Stooge Movie.
What did Rob think of the movie?
I didn't thinmk Chitty Chitty Bang Bang was exaclt just for little kids..
Dick Van Dyke's accent is still better than Tom Hank's accent in Elvis 😂😂😂
I’m honestly sick and tired of people bashing this movie and calling it “Not Faithful” when in my opinion it was alright
She passed in 1996
Who?
@@freddybear2005 Pamela Travers, the MARY POPPINS author, aka "P.L.Travers".
ONLY 399$$$$$
Is the doctor who movie good?
There's a movie?
Yup
It's was in the 90s, and was (until 2013) the 8th Doctor's only appearance. It's...interesting. I'll say that. Very interesting and unique. It's very Americanized. There's weird plot points about gang turf wars. The Doctor undergoes surgery and gets "killed" by the surgery team by accident due to his alien biology. That kinda thing. The Master is in the movie, but his portrayal is...well, weird. The Doctor Who fandom seems to universally hate it, but your opinion will vary. I personally enjoy it for what it is. It takes some liberties here and there and not all of them work, but it's not bad for what it is. It's also where the infamous theory that the Doctor might be half-human comes from, incidentally.
K
@@jamesg6660 Paul McGann is a really good doctor, even if I can't remember the rest of it
the adventures of milo and otis or Homeward Bound: The Incredible Journey
I live where all of the old west 1885 back to the part 3 stuff was filmed
please check out dimension 404! it's on now tv and Netflix, I'm kinda starting to get depressed on how little attention this show gets
Maybe people today just aren't that deep. 'It's for kids' seems to have become a cover. I watch people buying anything with wheels that moves faster than a child can run... for their children. With their limited attention spans and underdeveloped motor skills, they eventually get hurt. How is it those same children are not trusted to sit in one safe comfortable place and pay attention to a decant movie? Discuss...
The difference with Jack is that he’s crushing on Jane
The lion kings backgrounds are filmed so disney considers it live action
Review Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very, Bad Day.
Oh come on guys what happened to The First Viewings???
He did a first viewing on MPR back in December.
ExplorerDS6789 He did a review not a First Viewing!
Well, we can't have everything, can we?
FLASH SHIRT! FLASH SHIRT! FLASH SHIRT!
Hasn't he seen Into the Woods?
Will Doug and Rob be reviewing Godzilla King of the Monsters?
Critic, please make a review of "The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus"
3rd
Doug how many times are you going to talk about this movie?
No views fam where ya at
I was the 600th one to like
Why does Walter insist on the lounge lizard stache?
*Walter makes me so wet* I've practically soaked my chair 😁
Could you do a video on deep blue sea at all?
Review Balto 3
Do a kubo review k
second
you are 3rd
@@boert9120 naw the other guy misspelled "second" therefore i reign 2nd supreme. Kneel before me...
@@DownHavenEnt k
But worst
1st
The prequels weren't for 12-year-olds, they were for children, and even then no, because of the political shit. Say what you want about the sequels, but they kept more of a general audience vibe, instead of pandering to kids with Jar Jar but then tonally whip-lashing with politics for no reason. The humor may not be great in the new films, but at least it isn't fart jokes and poop jokes.
Doug is too obsessed with the original Mary Poppins and fails to see that the first film had some flaws too. Mary Poppins Return may not be perfect but it’s still a good movie. Doug, stop making people hate good movies you personally hate, they may have their problems but it doesn’t mean they’re bad movies.
First
who cares?
@@gsg-pb7kg I care.
Frozen sucks
So will the sequels
Why do so many people even care, I don't get it.
secound
Yes I ment to spell it wrong
You are fifth
Hey walter ever watch always be my maybe on netflix
Basically discount Demo Reel
Geez we get it. You hate the movie. This is like the third video on it.
As someone who watched the movie after your review, it’s clear there’s a LOT of bias cuz the movie is actually a lot of fun. Obviously not as good as the original, but if it did things too similarly then we’d get complaints that it was a repeat
Actually The Fourth, But You Are Right! Doug, I Love You, Man, But Gee Come On, We Get It, You Hate The Movie, Now Will You Please Stop This? And Honestly, I Like Doug's Review Better, Because It Has Much More Positivity Than NC's.
You really expect this modern Doug to NOT beat us over the beat with bashing something he doesn't like and call us out for daring to have our own opinions that don't match his?..................... that's just stupid! Pfft!
But seriously, though, that's one of the many reasons I gave up on him (which was BEFORE ChangeTheChannel).
Disney deserves all the stank that can be heaped onto them. I mean that decrepit mouse now has its claws on the ALIEN franchise. They're going to run it into the ground.
@@skylx0812 as if Alien 3 and 4 didn't already do that? xD
I think that might be a bit unfair. His first video is his comedic critique of the film and the 2nd video was him attempting to reimagine the film. The third video (this one) is simply him having a fair conversation with another collaborator and giving his honest thoughts on the film without any overexaggerated reactions or whatever you see in his reviews.
22nd
WE GET IT you don't like Mary poppins returns