EXCLUSIVE ACCESS to Bairstow & Carey's UNBELIEVABLE Ashes drama 😲
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 พ.ค. 2024
- It was the one of the most talked about event of the Ashes in 2023. The incredible drama when Jonny Bairstow was dismissed by Alex Carey. Go inside the Australian dressing room as the moment unfolded. Watch The Test - Season 3 on Prime Video now!
SUBSCRIBE TO AMAZON PRIME VIDEO SPORT: / @amazonprimevideosport
Follow Amazon Prime Video Sport on TikTok: / primevideosport
Follow Amazon Prime Video Sport on Instagram:
/ primevideosport
Follow Amazon Prime Video Sport on Twitter:
/ primevideosport - กีฬา
![Margin Call (2011) - Senior Partners Emergency Meeting [HD 1080p] (Re-Upload / Audio Fixed)](/img/n.gif)
"That's all you'll be remembered for....." *wins world cup couple months later*🤣
🤣Chad Cummins 🗿
@@Spectrescup yes its team work
@@Spectrescup Cummins daddy of chokar team ind
What world cup? There was a world cup? I thought that was in 2019.
What did Alex Carey did in that World Cup? Broad didn't said it to Cummins
Johnny boy must have a memory of a goldfish... 'It’s within the rules of the game and that’s how it is!' - Bairstow 2014
How about when broady stood his ground after smashing the ball to 1st slip? The audacity 😂😂
England just feel a bit goofy sometimes😂😂
He tried to marnus in same match
@@Sauvage_Foxes it actually was parried off the keeper. Also last I checked many batters don't walk
@@thomasdavey3033 last I checked Johnny boy shouldn't of walked😂 btw it was parried because broad absolutely smashed it.
As a Brit at the time I wasn’t too happy but looking back on it now it’s very funny. Seeing the old boys loose their dignity is always amusing. Good entertainment regardless of the outcome.
Fr
Well that's why we don't win. They don't think twice about being arseholes, you feel all bad about it
you're not a Brit anymore?
When someone starts his/her comment with "As a brit/Aussie/Italian" or whatever, it sounds so Indian.
Reminds me of the Ian Bell - MS dhoni incident
Broad to Carry - That's all you will be remembered for.
Carey - It's better than being remembered for getting hit for six sixes. 😂😂😂😂
And how many Test wickets?
@@marknewbold2583
You realise this is the guy who doesn’t know how to walk. Clearly shown in 2013
Englashman here, no complaints at all, clearly out the only one to blame was bairstow, the law is completely clear
Exactly, I don't get why this is such a foreign concept to some people 🤣
Yes the law is clear, the ball is considered dead when it's in the hands of the wicket keeper... Weak umpiring. Imagine being English and defending this nonsense or an Aussie celebrating this desperately cheap behaviour, not that surprising I guess 😂
@@Profanity1@Profanity1 if you watch the keeper threw the ball as soon as he got it, Bairstow went on walkabout without looking, his own fault. Your saying its dead as soon as it hits the wicketkeeper s hand. So what if the batsman decided to run, keeper had every right to throw, its dead when the umpire says over and when the keeper passes the bowl to another teammate and the bowler heads back to his bowling position.
@@Profanity1Why would you lie like that? The ball is most definitely not considered dead when it touches the keepers hands. You shouldn't just make things up to suit your argument
He isn’t an Englishman, he can’t even spell it! 😂
If the Carey did a misfield they might have sneaked a single as well right? Would that be called 'not good sportsmanship' if they sneaked a single? Absolutely not
Because at that time, the ball wasn't successfully collected by the keeper. It's called a Bye. A situation where the batter fails to make contact with the ball, and the keeper fails to collect it.
In this situation, the ball was collected successfully and Bairstow wasn't taking a single or any kind of advantage.
If Bairstow was already outside the crease, or they were planning to take a run, then keeper has full rights to take action.
I am not supporting any teams. But this means of wicket is not ideal to me. If we start considering taking such kind of wickets, the game will go on much longer like the way Stuart was acting.
@@RandomGuy-bx1cdno need to write a whole explanation to kids who don’t know anything about cricket
Who Won? 😏😒
😂🤣😂Marcus Harris!! “You wrote the rules you flippen idiot..😂🤣😂 not our fault..”!!! Stray-Yah!!
As Skull said You treat the crease like Juliane Assange treated the Ecuadorian Embassy. You just don't get out.
This is a banger of a line lol
Whatever Skull says is instantly forgettable.. the guy talks non stop and its usually just nonsense. Bring back commentators who know that sometimes silence is sometimes better than endless gobbery.
This is not cheating, this is the presence of mind from patty, the ultimate legend.
Isn’t he just awesome?! Love Captain Pat.. he’s just the best ❤❤❤
He sure is!!
Definitely
Cummins is a savage captain, he destroyed dreams of so many teams
Also an intelligent captain and good at man management.
Marcus Harris in 8:28
Well Bloody said😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
After watching this he's my fav player
What did he say?? Couldn't hear it properly
@@lipasnaik1303 he said "you wrote the rules, you f-ing idiots", when talking about the MCC members abusing the Aussies.
@@lipasnaik1303 he said "you write the rules you f***ing idiot "
"We ripped the soul out of them"- Pat Cummins
Always the objective against the Poms.
@@waggafletcherdidn't work, did it?
@@waggafletcherWinning by cheap means is your sporting culture
@@user-lx9uv7ww5j if its in rules its not considered as cheating
@user-lx9uv7ww5j just the other day, I saw Poms defending the fifth test ball change by saying "it's in the rules"
'Same old England, Always crying'
They’ve flooded bloody London with all the tears by now.
same old Aussies Always winning
Same old England , always angry
@@yogeshKumar-xl9yl
Heck yeahhhh 🟡🟢🟡🟢
@@yogeshKumar-xl9yl err the series was 2_2 you haven't won here since 01 .
Broad will also be remembered for not walking off when clearly nicking the ball. English cricket team falls back on the spirit of the game only when it suits them!
The umpire didn't give it and he's not obliged to walk
@@marknewbold2583we weren't obliged to revoke the appeal either. Deal with it
He'll always be remembered by 2 billion people for getting tonked for 6 sixes in an over 😂
NO. Completely different - because For me, walking or not walking is no longer a "Spirit of Cricket" issue since the introduction of DRS reviews. Broad didn't walk - but the Aussies had used up their reviews. Use of reviews are part of the game now, so not walking because you've burned your reviews is no longer a spirit of cricket issue.
Prior to DRS - yes - I might agree, but after DRS - Sorry, using your reviews sensibly is part and parcel of the game. You are supposed to use reviews for umpire "howlers" - but instead, teams routinely use DRS reviews to gain an advantage on marginal decisions. That's fine - but if you do that, you surrender your right to call howlers a "Spirit of Cricket" issue.
@@Quincycle No. Not obliged. Which is exactly why it's a Spirit of Cricket issue. The whole point is it's about being within the law, but not within the spirit.
The issue here is that the wicket came about through a confusion about whether the ball was dead.
Cricket, in order to be playable, requires the two teams to be sensible about agreeing when the ball is dead, otherwise the game would turn into a farce of double bluffs every single ball about whether the ball is dead.
It's part of the Spirit of Cricket, "Gentleman's agreement" To be sporting about the issue of dead ball, precisely so that play can continue in a smooth manner.
Otherwise you literally have the stupid pantomime that Broad demonstrated when he came out after Bairstow - of checking every single ball whether the ball was dead or not.
IT looked comical - but he was making a serious point - if teams start exploiting doubt over when the ball is dead to take wickets as a matter of routine, the game would descend into chaos.
So, If bairstow would have casually reached the other end while fist bumping stokes in the middle without anyone noticing, would the umpires have given a single ?
It would need Stokes to also run. If they both ran and made their ground it would be 1 run.
@@UmpireStrikesBack that's what I meant. In retrospect, it would have been a change of strike. But If england would have appealed that hey that was a casual single, would the umpires had given it so?
@@ShubhamSharma-mb4og Yes.
@@UmpireStrikesBack Cool
@@ShubhamSharma-mb4og buddy batters don't change the strike the fielding team does. And if they are casually walking and ball has stoped the movement then it is declared dead and run can't be run after thay
Moments like these keep sports alive!
That is very true
Mitchell Marsh In The End 😂😂😂😂
Well well well... England won world cup 2019 by the rule book.otherwise everyone know who is real lifter of cup... and now crowd crying....shut up mate
Steve Smith and the word 'crying' eh?
@@josephcole8046
England still don't have wc if they play fairly
@@bhogendrakhatiwada3053 If you're referring to the Stokes 'six', you're remarkably unintelligent 👍
Thought Steve smith would speak better English
I think England winning the World Cup was completely fair and I think what the Aussies did is completely fair as well. It's extremely hypocritical of English fans to celebrate winning a World Cup because of the laws while hating on the Aussies for taking a wicket using the laws.
That Nathan Lyon laugh 4:00 was gold 😂
I just love the "SHUT IT!!!" hahaha
Spirit of the game or not. If it's in the rules, you're allowed to use it to your advantage. Simple as that.
Yeah but it isn’t in the spirit of the game to stump someone who didn’t go out of his crease until when he thought the ball was dead. They weren’t trying to stump him for coming out of his crease while facing the ball so it is undoubtedly against the spirit of the game and the appeal should have been withdrawn. M
Its just as sly as mankading which people normally recognise as bad but not in this case apparently
@@joebowden4065 There should be far more mankading. It annoys me when cheating batters leave the crease.
Laws*
@@joebowden4065 was he the umpire? Only the umpire can call over and declare the ball dead. Just like with mankading it only happens when certain players go out of their crease over and over again.
As we've seen in this video, he was going out of his crease multiple times so the Aussies had every right to do what they did.
This will bring a smile to my face until the day I die. The gift that keeps giving.
Ken Oath mate
Cummins should have said to Broady: “Well, we all know what you’ll be remembered for” 😂
8-15
@@dukeofoven 6 sixes.
8:05 "people stepped over the line" but bairstow didn't
Slowing the video makes it more dramatic. Carey throws it as quick as possible, you can not leave your crease that early
Aussies definitely right in this case, so get on with it Poms. As a NZer, you very much got the rub of the rub of the rub of the green in that 2019 WC final too..
Carey didn't even hold the ball, it's basically a stumping. No idea why the Brits crying so hard.
Tbf, they have effectively replaced AUS fans as the most toxic in the world these days. Or even the on field players. I remember someone threw a bottle cap at KL Rahul a couple of years back.
It's in the scorebook as a stumping, yes. So Green actually got the wicket.
Because they’re by definition Whinging Poms.
They got their revenge in the last test with the dodgy ball replacement
@@cdn4767
Really? I know 2 Australians who have been physically assaulted by Indian men in Indian stadiums.
There are a lot of words said by English crowds, but they don't start punching someone else because they support the other team and have a different skin colour.
@@StuTheDon17 I’m sure it did happened before, it’s just I don’t remember.
This really should not have been as controversial as it was...Carey threw the ball immediately, it's on Bairstow for not checking where the ball was and for leaving the crease before the over had been called.
True
The fact Bairstow tried the exact same thing to Marnus earlier on in the test makes his reaction all the more pathetic.
Only against 'the spirit of the game' when it's going against you apparently.
As always with England
Even as an Englishman just get over it already. Old enough and wise enough to not leave your crease. I would have done the exact same as captain. Weather cost us a 3-2 win of the series. But Johnny also cost us that day! It is what it is.
And a brand new ball to replace a 38 over old ball contributed to England getting a 2-2 result.
@@longjohn5322 The umpires fault. Can’t blame the players.
Poor selection cost you the series. If you didn't have such idiotic selectors choosing Bairstow (an incompetent keeper who dropped multiple catches in the first game, whilst also scoring no runs) and Moeen (who had so many runs scored against him in the first game), England would have won both of the initial games of the series. There might have even been even a whitewash!
As an Aussie watching this live and all the follow up I said then and still say now.. FAVOURITE ASHES MOMENT EVER!!! Sums up everything that the Ashes is and has come from.. Those damn colonials facing up to the mother country on their home turf and winning.. how dare they! Whinging Poms cheeky Aussies f**king love it! First ever ashes to now
Ye, it's the Ashes. It's always gonna be a bit dirty from time to time. Bodyline is another example, but it's still not great if a team resorts to that sort of thing to win a game.
It's in your nature convict
@@JustinHH22 interestingly I do come from OG convict stock! Most proud of that .. 🇦🇺❤️
Is scraping a lucky 2-2 called “winning” now?
@@Zlatano-pc5pd retained the urn that’s a win
Johhny literally tried doing the same thing in the previous game. Oh the double standards 🤦♂️
not true he did it to batters who were brought out of their crease by playing a shot, totally idfferent
@@Max-gk6ot okay, maybe I'm wrong. But a simple question, was the ball called dead? No, right? It's pretty fair imho. We can agree to disagree :)
Imagine the celebrations if Stokes had pulled this one off(which he almost did)
I'm tipping there would be no withdrawn appeal or recall and the English press and pasty-faced MCC members would be hailing Stokes a genius.
If that would have happened, the 2 greatest Test Innings ever played would have both belonged to Ben Stokes.
Imagine the celebrations had it not rained in Manchester; eng would've won it and the series
@@ranks9354 Rain and Ball change saved England at 5th Test🤷♂️
@@ranks9354 rubbish
As an Indian cricket fan, I just love the ashes series and have never missed watching one since 1997 😊😊
So good, love these behind the scenes cuts
09:13 "Oh Broady! You have been such an outstanding citizen mate, ain't you?" :)
Should have put the reaction on Bairstows face when they shook hands. Priceless 🤣
End of the day if bairstow had done that to an Aussie he would be considered a legend
100%. He already tried against Marnus
@@eyecontrol4900 and Warner.
@@WasimBarri
And literally 8 other English involvements over the past decade
Marcus Harris 😂😂
Broad said to cummins that u would be always remember for that
Well guess what Pat cummins will always be remember as a World Cup + WTC + ASHES winning captain in a same year!!!
And wlil go down as one of the best captains not like the boundary count winners or so xD
Didn’t actually win the ashes…
He also said it to Carey...and he was correct.
He said it to Carey. Check out what happened to the poor fella after. Hung out to dry.
wait a minute the world cup win due to 'boundary count' was actually legal, until the rule was changed in November 2019, which was after the world cup, so I don't see the problem with being world cup boundary count winners...
Pretending that drawing the ashes is somehow the same as winning them, while also pretending that England somehow weren't worthy world cup winners despite winning it completely within the rules, speaks volumes about your bias my friend
bairstows a goose and has thrown stumps down before in county matches when the batsman has walked out of his crease. and england did get a brand new cherry made of granite saving them from defeat a few tests later, no need to cry lol
Uncle Johnny’s quiet little evening stroll came to an abrupt end.
They gave Jonny ample time to stop walking out his crease, so fair game!
The background music when all ausies were plotting the run out made me feel like hunter is spying out on his prey. and the fact that all aussies were aware about biarstow moving out of screeze shows their match awareness.
Exactly just like a pack of predators preying on their target silently in bushes
I honestly thought that war was going to break out at Lord's that day.
The way Aussie mate were supporting their team was op 😂😂
Anyone remember the additional "overthrow" runs Eng and Stokes got in WC ODI Final vs NZ?
Why is Season 3 geoblocked on Prime in Japan?? The first two seasons are available 😥
One of the most embarrassing chapters in English cricket history, and there's a lot to choose from. Shameful.
It was really tense times in the media.
Looks like it was all fun inside there. 😂😂😂
'The rules of the game can never hurt the spirit of the game.'
And "Same old England. Always crying"
Yes, Aussie crowds are a friendly bunch, never a bad word uttered by them at all.
We're lovely 😊
comparing posh elite MCC members to the feral drunks at the Gabba/Waca is pretty absurd, dont ya think?
Entire series is brilliantly edited.
I like how they keep showing Carey's innocent face 😂😂
Oooh damn! Mitch Marsh made me have a good ole chuckle😂😂
Broad: that's what you are gonna be remembered for
Boy what happened during 2013 ashes did you forgot that you nicked the ball to first slip not even the keeper and still stood your ground, ashamed that post that you played this long for England and became a legend and English crowd same old Aussie's always cheating hell if your team is that gentlemen why didn't they showed sportsman spirit when ball went to the boundary after ricocheting through Stokes bat, most pathetic crowd the world Has in any sport
Because both of those things (all 3 of those things) required an umpires decision, which was abided by. The only one to have the grace to be sheepish about it was Stokes, who apologised, but the Kiwis have always been popular over here.
As for most 'pathetic crowd', to what are you referring, as Australians adore going to England for the Ashes as the atmospheres are unique in world cricket.
3:30 one of the big mysterie is matt renshaw appealing to a ghost umpire
Absolutely brilliant!!! The England meltdown with all the crying was priceless. Stuart Broad, you will be remembered 6 sixes in an over. What a clown, well done OZ
You can’t beat seeing the English having a little cry 😂. Owzzzzzzatttttt 😅
Didn't they use your country as a literal prison? lmao
8:31 Marcus Harris..that’s savage.
Same stuart broad didn't move when he edged at the first slip 😂😂
I remember in the WC against SL Rashid was dozy out of his crease at the non striker end and Mendis throw it to the stump and he get run out.
“You wrote the f*ffing rules mate” 😅😅
An incorrect statement
Why didn't they show the videos of Bairstow doing the same thing to other batters before this incident?
The incident you're referring to isn't remotely the same but if it helps you cope with the desperatation of this cheap wicket then good for you 😂👏
@@Profanity1 Bairstow tried running out Marnus Labushagne on Day 3 of the same test. Internet is free dickhead
@Profanity1 Internet is free Bairstow was reminded after the incident that on day three of the Lord’s Test, Bairstow attempted to stump Marnus Labuschagne in the exact same fashion in which he was dismissed two days later.
Nice try mate but next time you want to seem smart, stop, check what you writing and then don't write anything. It's better to be a silent fool than to give voice and have it confirmed.
@@user-cn1nz6gd3y If you can't understand the difference between a batsman batting out of his crease and therefore trying to gain an advantage compared to a batsman thinking the ball is dead and walking out of his crease to the middle after the over then you're not very intelligent at all..
@Profanity1 and if you can't watch the video of Bairstow and Labushagne on day 3 then your as blind as you are stupid. It's okay, go play with your Lego. Adults are talking
Amazing series ❤
Things looking more hostile than India vs Pakistan 😂😂😂
This is real cricket ❤❤
Same old England always cry,
Same old Aussies always winning.
They haven't won in England for 23 years lol.
Really ? I remember your boys crying when the England crowd got at them in the next tests.
@@Spectrescup don't need to win there just retain like the 90's west indies
@@Spectrescup what about england when was the last time England won test match in Australia.😭
@@micheal197012 u guys have kept ur bar really low😂😂
The banter of english cricket... Its make atmosphere so alive
I love these documentaries.
Strategical run out masterclass by Aussies aussie respect button ✅
England: 'same old Aussies always cheating'
I say ' same old England always whining'
No offence to the English supporters
Nah, full offence to the whinging poms
Haha 😂. Can't argue with that
@@AxeDharme Whinging cons more like...sandpaper anyone?
@@AshesHereos colonizing (stealing) anyone??
Worldcup without cheating anyone??
@@AshesHereosand obviously this was not cheating from any point of view
It was Bairstow's mistake all along
English fan here and I never had any issues with the decision, but the atmosphere because of it was epic 😂
As a Brit I was there in the holies in edgbaston for my first ever Ashes experience and it was hands down the best experience in sport and atmosphere I’ve ever seen 😂
8:30😂😂😂
Moments like these are sooooo goood especially in the ashes and are keeping the ashes alive
Cunning Cummins ❤
😂😂😂😂
The reaction of the England fans & crowds at the time was all emotion, and would likely have been the same in Australia if the shoe was on the other foot. Most fans now realise it was a perfectly fair dismissal.
No chance. We would point our disgust at our batsman who walked out of his crease before the keeper threw the ball to a team mate, making play dead.
@@StuTheDon17 OK
@@StuTheDon17 Yeah I think our media would have been harsh on the dope for being lazy and having little match awareness. Had he been a non NSWelshman, well there be calls for replacements
@@StuTheDon17 yes of course. You are either a liar or the most naive person on the planet
This is equivalent in baseball to a runner walking off base before an umpire calls time
Did ben stokes overturn the decision when he flicked the ball in the world cup which eventually led to england winning the world cup?
Stuart Broad tells Carey that this moment is all that Carey will ever be remembered for, has broad forgotten the moment when he clearly nicked a ball but refused to walk.
Also, earlier in this match, Bairstow did the same thing to Marnus.
I have an issue with the inconsistency in how some incidents are portrayed differently from others, yes he threw it without taking any time (because he was prepared to do it, it wasn't completely instinctive), and it was the right thing to do ... just wandering out casually without any bother, from his point of view- he did give a small scratch each time he left the crease, but still is considered as loose.
Now coming to Mankad, everyone in the field along with the bowler observes the non-striker leaving the crease causally and the bowler is prepared to lift bail off when he does it, now why do you have to give a warning after mankading, what is so extremely wrong in running out a batsman at the non-strikers end when the batsman walks out gaining an advantage also as opposed to Johnny's case. Why all the opposite drama here?
Aussies did the right thing, to which Michael Vaughan and others agreed to without any issue and calling it dozy stuff from Bairstow, why a total opposite reaction to Mankad?... don't tell me that bowler has no intention of bowling and stuff, reiterating it... Carey didn't do it instinctively and was planned as it should it be..
As a neutral person, I don't find any cheating by Australia this time. It is the responsibility of the batter to be aware of the signal of completion of over. In this scenario, the batter immediately walked out of the crease without checking the signal and waiting for few more seconds. The keeper did well, and appreciated for his level of concentration and focused on the game that he immediately sees the mistake made by the batter and did what is in the interest of his team. However, there should be a rule, at least, that the batter will not be consider out at the first time, can be called as "Warning", after that he will not get any mercy and straight be declared as run out.
Love to hear any other opinion contrary to mine.
I’ll never agree that a warning should be given for the breach of a well established and clear law. Not from an umpire anyway. If a captain chooses to that’s his choice.
No ind vs aus or ind vs pak comes even closer to ashes , truly the best rivalry !!
Moments like these stay iconic for a long time. Similar to how the Mathews time-out wicket during the last year's ODI WC, the only point people make is on the spirit of cricket. Personally, it's just a matter of whether you perceive the batsman's action to affect the bowling side in any way. In this instance, i would say it was a bit harsh on Bairstow but fair play to the Aussies.
Cheaters calling cheaters as cheaters. They both are same. Recall how england won the worldcup
Under the rules of the game?
@@SpectrescupRules? Why would they just end the game when scores were levelled after the super over....what kind of rules were applied there?Counting the boundaries💩
@@Viv234 Rules made by the English Players and English Umpires that day
By the laws of cricket they came short by 1 run. NZ should have won it.
@@Viv234
Then this is also under the rules of the game he's out
Anyways atleast at the end of the day Australia have won 6 World Cups fair and square meanwhile all the English could do was win one world cup by boundary counts
At the end of the day, it was out, but Broad's not wrong at 04:51🤣 Turning point in the series as well, Aus were rattled, as you can tell by their performance for the rest of the day. They were firmly second best for the remainder of the series.
how about the poms win a test down in australia, its been a decade since you've done it.
@@Roz0007 Yep, it would be nice, we'll just have to settle for that T20 tournament thing (began with a 'W' I think) they won there a couple of years back, oh well. Maybe Aus will win a series in England again at some point too! 2-0 up after 2 tests was probably a decent opportunity now that I think about it.
Best part 8:25 Marcus harris doesn't even hesitate a little....
Fully Bairstows fault. You can shout all day about cheating etc but that was within the rules of a game AND Johnny is a bloody keeper too! From an Englishman.
And all Broad will be remembered for is smashing it to first slip and not walking. The lack of self awareness of this flog to talk about sportsmanship is amazing
at the end of the day, you can say that about any batter who knicks it to keeper but umpire doesnt give it out... everyone always waits for umpires decision, and btw im english and i also agree bairstow was out before you try and throw that at me.
@@ethanwiles1798True.but if u use the same logic..the umpires also ruled this out..
@@santoshraghavan7662 yeah i agree, bairstow is out, anyone whos watched cricket knows its out
Broad will only be remembered for getting hammered for 6 sixes
Broad is a professional troll with the intelligence of a brick. Nobody outside of England takes him seriously. Everyone remembers him for being hit for 6 6's and hitting to slip and not walking.
Imagine having to get out a batter by ANY means necessary 😬
Imagine losing a final at home
That's literally cricket. You get a batter out using the laws.
Who writes the laws of cricket you numpty?
I personally think this moment cost Australia an ashes win. Totally changed the mood over here, and galvanised them.
I think so too, however if Carey didn't stump Bairstow then we probably would've lost the came and even the series.
Haha I went for this days play. Was insane in the stands!
This was a key moment that turned the series. Regardless of what they say here, the Ozzies felt like villains. Australia were shook up by the backlash and never recovered
Not really, aus still would of won that game if not for the ball change and lion injured
Umpire not watching, square leg umpire walking away..
Foolish from Bairstow, but in fairness who would expect that from any respectable sports team.
It literally will be the only thing Carey is remembered for.
😂😂😂😂 Same old pommies, always whinging
@@TG22222 Not sure how you’ve taken that from my comment?
No one is going to remember Carey for this. He'll be remembered for a bunch of other things. By your own logic, Broad should've walked a decade ago when he clearly knicked the ball and was given not out. By that logic, England should've refused the 2019 World Cup because they didn't win without using technical laws.
@@rangergaming8316 You’re right, Broad should’ve walked. You’re wrong on the WC. That was a rule that was already existing, not something we knowingly exploited.
And it will be all Carey is remembered for. He’s not particularly outstanding with bat or the gloves.
@@iketyke7324 what rule did the Aussies exploit? The law that states only the umpire can call over? That's been in the laws for decades and if the umpire had called over before Bairstow stepped out then he would've been given not out but the umpire said that never called over meaning the ball wasn't dead.
It doesn't matter if the law was exploited or not, England won the 2019 World Cup because of a law that was not talked about until the end of the match and they got to that position only because of another law that allowed for Stokes to get six runs off a midfield from his own bat.
You just can't be in favor of one and not the other.
I am loving the Skream and Bizzle in the background
He threw the ball immeadiately. He didnt wait, he didnt pause. Thats out. Plain and simple.
Not cheating, wait til over is called. Simple as that, this is coming from an English fan.
I also hate the people that agree it was out but still say it wasn't in the spirit of the game. You're playing to win and if you're using a law that already exists then it's completely fair.
The umpire was already looking down, starting to move to square leg. God knows why he hadn't officially called it.
Except he wasn't. He hadn't moved when ball hit stumps.
ikr
Because the square leg umpire doesn’t call over, the main umpire does.
Awesome 👍
Broad: That's all you'll be remembered for
Carey: Let me ask Yuvraj what you'll be remembered for
As an English fan I don’t really care about it , it was the rain at Manchester that saved the Aussies from getting beat and losing the ashes not the Bairstow dismissal
Australia do have champion players and is definitely a great team but they also have some luck going there way in crucial games or moments...
You can argue but when did England last won a test forget series after 2011 down under
@@AllInOne-zj9td it's too good a series for England to 'forget'
It was England cheating in the 5th test by getting a new ball as a replacement in the 37th over that allowed England to even get a 2-2 draw. Good moral victory hey? Same old England always whinging.
simple solution: stop scheduling tests at Manchester, they nearly always get rained out.
You're welcome.
"Same old Aussies, always cheating" love this chanting 😂
Loved the position of England in this WC 23
@@himanshupal6083 I loved the game on 19th November too. (:
@@justtheguy27Loved the game on 15 October