Baron Benjamin Rothschild "I understand that it is a complicated business, mainly because of the fanatics and extremists - and I am talking about both sides. I think you have fanatics in Israel... In general I am not in contact with politicians. I spoke once with Netanyahu. I met once with an Israeli finance minister, but the less I mingle with politicians the better I feel."
Interesting but the fact still stands that Jacob I believe of the same family was photographed with M. ABROMAVICH in front of a painting named Satan summoning his legions showing of who they serve TRUTH
One final thing-even in the Rothschild family, the question of Israel is not universally agreed. Some were indeed wanted an independent Jewish state, others did not. Perhaps those CT'ers can square this statement from Baron Benjamin Rothschild ""We do business with all kinds of countries, including Arab countries. My oldest daughter's boyfriend is a Saudi. He is a great guy and if she will want to marry him, she can."
The problem again with your description being that there is nothing "Rightist" about Nazis, who were essentially reformed socialists. Bolsheviks called them Rightist more as an insult than anything else. The Nazis weren't pro-monarchists (the original meaning of "Rightist") and certainly weren't in favor of free market capitalism - quite the opposite actually. The labels are messed up mainly because of Leftists in academia. Before Marxism, what constituted the Left and Right made perfect sense.
your man said it himself, for the last 2 centurys a couple of million people have noticed there is something up with that family, if someone is gona hold a grudge for 2 centurys i think theres a reason that grudge is been held if ye know what i mean..
James Burnham was an ex-Troskyite (he literally knew Trotsky personally) who tried to demonstrate in 1943 that the socialists movements in Germany, Russia and to some extent social reforms in the liberal democracies as well were neither capitalist nor socialist, but rather part of a new ideological movement he called "managerialism". This was characterized by a growing managerial class of professional government bureaucrats that ruled in the name of their own economic and political interests.
It's so easy for propaganda to work, and dissent to be mocked. The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing. Question everything, think for yourself.
When Icke said that, he did not mean it in a literal sense, as in "the reincarnation of Jesus Christ." He didn't mention Jesus at all. He said he was a "son of god" just like the rest of us, as in, we are all parts of a collective whole, & that consciousness could be referred to as "god" or whatever. Already being viewed as a lunatic at that point, most people chose to run with the misinformation that he was claiming to be Jesus, & to this day it is perpetuated, even though entirely inaccurate.
@TheLasVegasElite Taken from a direct quotation from the declassified Northwood Document: "The President said bluntly that we were not discussing the use of military force, that General Lemnitzer might find the U.S so engaged in Berlin or elsewhere that he couldn't use the contemplated 4 divisions in Cuba." So it was rejected, and it was one of a series of proposals put before President Kennedy
(Incidentally, neither Republicans nor Democrats in the US honestly want a smaller government, although both might cater to this idea from time to time. Both parties struggle over control of federal tax money, not to give it to either taxpayers or the needy but to distribute those funds to their respective factions. Republicans represent the military-industrial complex, such as it is, while the Democrats represent the government welfare bureaucracy. Neither faction is intrinsically ideological.)
@mikeyo1234 First hand accounts are indeed biased, but there value is that it comes directly from the source and gives an insight into the mind of the person writing the piece. It is the job of the Historian to place this evidence into context- what events did occur, and what do other sources say at the time, along with statistical and other empherical information. (cont)
The Nazis may have seen the monarchy as old fashioned but they never though it would be a bad idea...in fact they looked at it as the last legit form of government Germany head and Emperor Wilhelm II. strongly endorsed Hitler...calling him his "executioner" and he saw Hitlers early successes as part of his work. Many monarchists and nobles supported Hitler as well. Of course...the Nazis didn't really loved them back...but if there haven't been a big difference between Nazis and Commies none of
Niall and David are both very smart guys, I think this is merely a difference of perspective. Niall is one of the greatest historians alive today no doubt. Troublesome.
"Try to remember that truth springs from doubt." "How can you dismiss all such ideas?" Really??? I thought truth springs from rational thought, emperical evidence and the ability to tell fact from fiction. I guess in your "post-modern" world view, I guess any old shit is true. I dunno, I guess I am just old fashioned that I value things like education and a curious mind. I guess In the "post-modern revisionist" world even common sense seems to be soooo yesterday's thinking.....
the nobles or monarchist and especially not the Emperor would have supported the Nazis in any way. I think this big difference is well described by giving the Nazis the opposite direction of communists, by calling the one group left and the other right. Of course there have been many similarities as well, like they both have been dictatorships based on a party. Former Chancellor and Nobel peace prize winner Willy Brandt said..."Communists are just Fascists painted in red". But he was a
Icke freezes when confronted by a none believer! I have always found this strange because Icke can sometimes be charming and witty, but when asked simple questions by a guy who is not a fan. Icke looks like a rabbit caught in headlights!
@DiamondDWable if you have not noticed there is the english way of spelling and the american way.. i never said language was my thing anyway, im a numbers guy
Does David Icke ever go head-to-head with people who refute his claims? I only recently have been reading about him & watched a couple of his (seminar) videos, I was wondering how he fares when confronted by anyone who really knows what they're talking about, & they take him head-on.
Dunno about Eustice Mullins being a "right-winger".The word has become little more than a Leftist epithet for people they don't like (including rival Leftist factions), and Mullins is so close in ideology to the very Leftist Nazis that I simply don't see how the term could apply to him otherwise.
I think that the term "right" or "rightist" is used in another way in the US than in my home country (Germany). There are big differences like...our "liberal" party...is what you would probably call neocons. And the main ingredient of being" right" are usually nationalism, sympathy for fascism or a strict conservatism, dislike of foreigners and strict punishment of mis doers. Anti-capitalism (as well as anti-Americanism) is usually also a part of it. All the little Nazi loving parties with
And what do you mean with "unapologetic neo-Nazi"...hasn't Mullins claimed that the Nazis worked with these Banker families and has been puppets of them? How does a fascist benefit from criticizing the Fed? In which way would a America without a Fed be more likable for the right? Can you remember claims he made about that topic? Thanks for answering...if you do answer me.
@dopplereffeckt675 what you just said means nothing to me, the joint chiefs of staff proposed this to man who didn't want a war with Cuba and wanted to pull out of Vietnam and was murdered soon after?! I haven't read the official document, but I've heard and read enough to know the governments use false flags. What about the Gulf of Tonkin
The world cycles through eras of flourishing life, to eras of disaster, and that is completely normal. When people say "the world," do they mean the world as we (humans) know it? Or do they mean, eventually, our sun is going to burn out & the earth will plunge into utter darkness & everything will die? At least we've got about 7 billion years to go before the latter. Our sun isn't even middle-aged yet, at 4.6 billion years.
pointing out that they match left wing (and especially anarchist) criteria as well...sometimes even better. (which pisses me of because I consider myself a lefty or what is probably called a liberal in the US) But thank god...the word "Idiot" is used similar in both of our languages. I think it suites at least D. Icke and the more extreme truthbenders very well. The term managerialism or Mr. Burnham are new to me, but I think it also fits to describe our present political reality.
This interview was made in 1993...exactly 20 years ago. So...maybe he was one of those "Not all jews are bad but some are very bad" guys or one of those "I hate jews...but not in public" guys or you met his nutty twin ; )
I actually met Eustice Mullins once, about 20 years ago I think. He was an unapologetic neo-Nazi. As far as bat-shit crazy nutters go, he was quite interesting. Almost lucid.
I agree. He is a Con Artist. I listened to several of icke's TH-cam videos. I got sucked in like so many do. & found myself repeating to others, some of the things he claims about the monarchy. About Lizard beings etc. I believe David icke is a High range Overt Narcissist & a Genius The traits he shows & how he presents, How easily he lies & continues repeating same things over & over for 30+ years, being unable to change. I think he is a Lunatic. He's scaring a lot of people & many are elderly & young teens. Has a net worth of $10,000,000,000. That's in Pounds Sterling.
He certainly comes across as very narcissistic. I think he can be viewed as a failed 'messiah'. Someone who never managed to get the following he believes he deserves. But I don't think he's a genius. He just knows what his audience wants to hear.
@outlaw87100 Eh? Excuse me you haven't answered my question. I gave you link which concerns a "charity" called Common Purpose, which provides training courses across the UK and on those courses allegedly uses NLP on people without their consent - changing their beliefs without them knowing and screwing with their heads. Now, I assume you're open minded about all this, so I'm also assuming you watched the link I gave. Now, I'll ask you again. What do you think of Common Purpose?
James Bunham codified these ideas in his book "The Managerial Revolution". I think you can find a copy online for free. I know I did. If you've read George Orwell's 1984, you've already had a whiff of hi ideas. Burnham and Orwell had once been friends, but Burnham's ideas on managerialsim casued a break between them. Orwell used Burnham's ideas as the basis for the villain O'Brien.
@PeteFD1986 I assume when you mean "Neuro-linguistic Programming" you mean touchy fluffy stuff like classic phrases like "‘driving synergies", "‘out of the box thinking", "move the lens" "“Lets touch base” “Lets get a dialogue going” and other management bullshit. If this is an attempt to take over the world, then it isn't working. I fell asleep last time I went to one of these training sessions.....
Your explanation about who is using what...made it easier for me to understand things. In MY country he would be probably labeled a right-winger...because he flirted with the Nazis and some of their ideas. But I guess this labels don't suit him well. Nevertheless I feel like he was very successful turning once normal person into guys who admire fascist ideas, refuse the modern world and hide in the woods to look out for UN helicpoters. I think that is sad for conservatives and liberals.
@dopplereffeckt675 It seems so strange, that even though information (official and otherwise) is easier to get, that more people seem to fall back creating narrations that generally suit their own worldview. All it takes is to pop down your local museum or library and ask to see archive records of your topic of choice. I am sure the British Museum or the National Archives has information regarding Rothchilds, so you can also read some of his stuff directly.
Well there you have it, they dont care, they just like to complain about vast ammouts of cheap energy/supersize meals/how much they havent got. A serious war/disease, etc is needed to give many poeple a reference point.
I guess Mullins would be happy to see his theories that omnipresent on YT. Assuming that you know a lot about that topic may I ask a question? Why is that "Federal Reserve System" topic such a big deal for right-wingers like Mullins? Maybe I misunderstand what being "right-winger" means in America because I'am from europe. But as far as I know having a small and not so powerful state is a basic idea of american conservatives. Why do these people want the state to control the currency?
@Incognitoification1 Yes, you've stated that you've such little confidence in your own 'understanding' that you are unable to debate the rational and realistic basis for that 'understanding'. I think that someone who has INDEPENDENTLY researched events, individuals and bloodlines for 20 plus years has a greater IMPARTIAL awareness than that of some 'Yale' boys who are part of the 'education' repitition system. It's ok, don't be afraid, think for yourself :)
@Incognitoification1 People are infallible not theories. Try to remember that truth springs from doubt. Who do you follow - those who claim to have the truth or those who seek it? You may feel patronised by people who have researched the evidence for themselves rather than relying entirely on biased sources but that is your problem not someone elses. How can you dismiss all such ideas? If the sky is blue and a CT theorist says so, is it any less blue because a conspiracy theorist said it?
@dopplereffeckt675 If you value a curious mind why do you mock? The beginning of wisdom is found in doubting; by doubting we come to question, and by seeking we may stumble upon the truth. There are two ways to slide easily through life: to believe everything or to doubt everything; both ways save us from thinking. It is not bigotry to be certain we are right; but it is bigotry to be unable to imagine how we might possibly have gone wrong. If you're not confused, you're not paying attention.
@arsenalrule2001uk I was thinking after you have a go at him I was gonna get it a whirl. Another thing the term "conspiracy theorist"is a loaded word.The connotation it musters is do to what we learned in the pass through repetition(the media). Therefore merely uttering the word "conspiracy theory"it guides the audience in a predictable direction.(as the readers of this page subconsciously or consciously agree with me.)
@mikeyo1234 Historians can then piece together all the information from these various sources and give an account of why an event took place. CT theorists tend to focus in on one piece of evidence for example the Operation Northwood document, and tend to forget the context which that document was produced- in this case the Cuban Crisis in the early 60's. Today with the freedom of information act, anybody can obtain documents or undergo research. I do it as part of my job. (cont)
@TheLasVegasElite I think that would roughly equate to about $200,000 USD per year, not including guest speaker events. Where does he keep his money? In the piggy bank? In a cookie Jar? Again my hunch is that he to also uses the same institutions that are controlling the world. I gather his ex wife runs his media affairs, how else can he afford to fly around the world to over 40 countries. See its little things like that give the game away. CT is Big Business now, almost Corporate.....
@dopplereffeckt675 Is that how we found out that the world was round? By rational thought and the 'ability to tell fact from fiction' or was it through doubting the commonly held 'fact' that the world was flat? Doubting IS ESSENTIAL. No need to get personal, i am not the first to understand that truth comes from doubt. To have doubted one's own first principles is the mark of a civilized man. The trouble with the world is that the stupid are so confident while the intelligent are full of doubt.
@dopplereffeckt675 When a person speaks to you, listen to him carefully and with respect -- but do not believe him. Never put your trust into anything but your own intellect. No matter whether he has gray hair or not, no matter whether he is a Nobel laureate -- may be wrong. The world progresses, year by year, century by century, as the members of the younger generation find out what was wrong among the things that their elders said. So you must always be skeptical -- always think for yourself.
@Incognitoification1 Well that's good because i'm not a conspiracy theorist, i'm a truth seeker. Will you debate with me? Or only with people that agree with you! I only engage in impartial, empirically assessed debates without the need for mockery. So, you think Bin Laden was responsible?
@dopplereffeckt675 'Education? Peer Review? Evidence Based Research' What is your view of applying your ideas to a historical revisionist approach of the 'holocaust' which to this day is cited as the reason for Zionism and the genocide taking place in Palestine today. Start the process and you realise 'truth' is being blocked and discredited, only certain authorised personnel can provide any revision of these world changing events (whatever they were) Or have you got all the 'facts' you need?
@Incognitoification1 Also, 'discredited' by whom i ask? The very people who fund the universities that promote this 'happy' research. Quote me a single INDEPENDENT researcher who rationally and adequately 'discredits' any commonly accepted alternative suggestions. Don't cloak your impotence with righteousness!
@Mathaius833 No each individual is respossible for a tiny part of what happens in the world. There does appear to be a need in some personalities to require a kind of imaginary evil foe as an explaination for there failings.
@dopplereffeckt675 Firstly, it appears necessary to state that the word individual and independent have a different meaning lol Niall Ferguson (professor at Harvard Uni & now doing a bio on Henry Kissinger) very independent lmao Brian (tabloid favourite) Cox, also very independent lol Clearly it is you who does not understand education as, overwhelmingly in certain subjects, nothing more than indoctrination. 'Believe this or you fail'
@Incognitoification1 lmao come on then mate, lets have a debate :) You pick the topic and we'll see who offers the greatest degree of rationality from an IMPARTIAL, EMPIRICAL perspective. Go on, please, make my day lol You can lead a horse to water, you can't make it realise it's water lol
@plenty2see Yawn............. I see the tin foil hat has done wonders for your spelling. I suggest going back to school, and learning some history, or (gulp) English....
@DiamondDWable Sometimes I have to abbreviate, or kinda toy w/ the spelling of words, in order to fit them all into 1 comment spot (due to character limits). And, as far as punctuation goes, I prefer to ignore the rules & punctuate in my own personal manner. - So 2 best allow my writing 2 reflect the flow of my speech. (And folks r always telling me they get it, & can hear it as if I was saying it 2 them, when they read.. So it works!) However, I get what u were referring 2 in comment above. ;)
Baron Benjamin Rothschild
"I understand that it is a complicated business, mainly because of the fanatics and extremists - and I am talking about both sides. I think you have fanatics in Israel... In general I am not in contact with politicians. I spoke once with Netanyahu. I met once with an Israeli finance minister, but the less I mingle with politicians the better I feel."
Interesting but the fact still stands that Jacob I believe of the same family was photographed with M. ABROMAVICH in front of a painting named Satan summoning his legions showing of who they serve TRUTH
One final thing-even in the Rothschild family, the question of Israel is not universally agreed. Some were indeed wanted an independent Jewish state, others did not.
Perhaps those CT'ers can square this statement from Baron Benjamin Rothschild ""We do business with all kinds of countries, including Arab countries. My oldest daughter's boyfriend is a Saudi. He is a great guy and if she will want to marry him, she can."
The problem again with your description being that there is nothing "Rightist" about Nazis, who were essentially reformed socialists. Bolsheviks called them Rightist more as an insult than anything else. The Nazis weren't pro-monarchists (the original meaning of "Rightist") and certainly weren't in favor of free market capitalism - quite the opposite actually.
The labels are messed up mainly because of Leftists in academia. Before Marxism, what constituted the Left and Right made perfect sense.
your man said it himself, for the last 2 centurys a couple of million people have noticed there is something up with that family, if someone is gona hold a grudge for 2 centurys i think theres a reason that grudge is been held if ye know what i mean..
David Icke did.
James Burnham was an ex-Troskyite (he literally knew Trotsky personally) who tried to demonstrate in 1943 that the socialists movements in Germany, Russia and to some extent social reforms in the liberal democracies as well were neither capitalist nor socialist, but rather part of a new ideological movement he called "managerialism". This was characterized by a growing managerial class of professional government bureaucrats that ruled in the name of their own economic and political interests.
I'm not Jewish. And his name is Niall. Thanks for the permission.
It's so easy for propaganda to work, and dissent to be mocked. The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing. Question everything, think for yourself.
Yes but he said it would end that year so we can all agree he is a mad man.
He gave 900mil$ as far as i'm noticed. And that is nothing in comparison with what he earned in his life time.
When Icke said that, he did not mean it in a literal sense, as in "the reincarnation of Jesus Christ." He didn't mention Jesus at all. He said he was a "son of god" just like the rest of us, as in, we are all parts of a collective whole, & that consciousness could be referred to as "god" or whatever. Already being viewed as a lunatic at that point, most people chose to run with the misinformation that he was claiming to be Jesus, & to this day it is perpetuated, even though entirely inaccurate.
@TheLasVegasElite
Taken from a direct quotation from the declassified Northwood Document:
"The President said bluntly that we were not discussing the use of military force, that General Lemnitzer might find the U.S so engaged in Berlin or elsewhere that he couldn't use the contemplated 4 divisions in Cuba."
So it was rejected, and it was one of a series of proposals put before President Kennedy
(Incidentally, neither Republicans nor Democrats in the US honestly want a smaller government, although both might cater to this idea from time to time. Both parties struggle over control of federal tax money, not to give it to either taxpayers or the needy but to distribute those funds to their respective factions. Republicans represent the military-industrial complex, such as it is, while the Democrats represent the government welfare bureaucracy. Neither faction is intrinsically ideological.)
@mikeyo1234
First hand accounts are indeed biased, but there value is that it comes directly from the source and gives an insight into the mind of the person writing the piece.
It is the job of the Historian to place this evidence into context- what events did occur, and what do other sources say at the time, along with statistical and other empherical information.
(cont)
@TheLasVegasElite Dont want to go off topic, but WTF do you do with all that oil you use?
The Nazis may have seen the monarchy as old fashioned but they never though it would be a bad idea...in fact they looked at it as the last legit form of government Germany head and Emperor Wilhelm II. strongly endorsed Hitler...calling him his "executioner" and he saw Hitlers early successes as part of his work. Many monarchists and nobles supported Hitler as well. Of course...the Nazis didn't really loved them back...but if there haven't been a big difference between Nazis and Commies none of
Niall and David are both very smart guys, I think this is merely a difference of perspective. Niall is one of the greatest historians alive today no doubt. Troublesome.
"Try to remember that truth springs from doubt."
"How can you dismiss all such ideas?"
Really??? I thought truth springs from rational thought, emperical evidence and the ability to tell fact from fiction. I guess in your "post-modern" world view, I guess any old shit is true.
I dunno, I guess I am just old fashioned that I value things like education and a curious mind. I guess In the "post-modern revisionist" world even common sense seems to be soooo yesterday's thinking.....
what choice do i have? If everyone boycotted oils and plastics tomorrow, id be with them doing my best.
the nobles or monarchist and especially not the Emperor would have supported the Nazis in any way. I think this big difference is well described by giving the Nazis the opposite direction of communists, by calling the one group left and the other right.
Of course there have been many similarities as well, like they both have been dictatorships based on a party. Former Chancellor and Nobel peace prize winner Willy Brandt said..."Communists are just Fascists painted in red". But he was a
hahahahaaaaa ...according to wikipedia...hahaaaa,looooool
They make good red wine
Icke freezes when confronted by a none believer! I have always found this strange because Icke can sometimes be charming and witty, but when asked simple questions by a guy who is not a fan. Icke looks like a rabbit caught in headlights!
@DiamondDWable if you have not noticed there is the english way of spelling and the american way.. i never said language was my thing anyway, im a numbers guy
Does David Icke ever go head-to-head with people who refute his claims? I only recently have been reading about him & watched a couple of his (seminar) videos, I was wondering how he fares when confronted by anyone who really knows what they're talking about, & they take him head-on.
Dunno about Eustice Mullins being a "right-winger".The word has become little more than a Leftist epithet for people they don't like (including rival Leftist factions), and Mullins is so close in ideology to the very Leftist Nazis that I simply don't see how the term could apply to him otherwise.
I think that the term "right" or "rightist" is used in another way in the US than in my home country (Germany). There are big differences like...our "liberal" party...is what you would probably call neocons.
And the main ingredient of being" right" are usually nationalism, sympathy for fascism or a strict conservatism, dislike of foreigners and strict punishment of mis doers.
Anti-capitalism (as well as anti-Americanism) is usually also a part of it. All the little Nazi loving parties with
Arrogant jewish Ferguson would say something like that.
Yes and every sane man would say is proof of his INsanity.
And what do you mean with "unapologetic neo-Nazi"...hasn't Mullins claimed that the Nazis worked with these Banker families and has been puppets of them? How does a fascist benefit from criticizing the Fed? In which way would a America without a Fed be more likable for the right?
Can you remember claims he made about that topic?
Thanks for answering...if you do answer me.
Queen lizzy lizard the 2nd...looollll
I agree with this chap David Icke is as mad as a hatter.
@dopplereffeckt675 what you just said means nothing to me, the joint chiefs of staff proposed this to man who didn't want a war with Cuba and wanted to pull out of Vietnam and was murdered soon after?! I haven't read the official document, but I've heard and read enough to know the governments use false flags. What about the Gulf of Tonkin
The world cycles through eras of flourishing life, to eras of disaster, and that is completely normal. When people say "the world," do they mean the world as we (humans) know it? Or do they mean, eventually, our sun is going to burn out & the earth will plunge into utter darkness & everything will die? At least we've got about 7 billion years to go before the latter. Our sun isn't even middle-aged yet, at 4.6 billion years.
pointing out that they match left wing (and especially anarchist) criteria as well...sometimes even better. (which pisses me of because I consider myself a lefty or what is probably called a liberal in the US)
But thank god...the word "Idiot" is used similar in both of our languages. I think it suites at least D. Icke and the more extreme truthbenders very well.
The term managerialism or Mr. Burnham are new to me, but I think it also fits to describe our present political reality.
Ferguson is young man here .. maybe he converted to Icke-ism . :)
@Omnislash2000 Yeah? What charities?
This interview was made in 1993...exactly 20 years ago.
So...maybe he was one of those "Not all jews are bad but some are very bad" guys or one of those "I hate jews...but not in public" guys
or you met his nutty twin ; )
I actually met Eustice Mullins once, about 20 years ago I think. He was an unapologetic neo-Nazi.
As far as bat-shit crazy nutters go, he was quite interesting. Almost lucid.
WTF? "To understand you have to feel from the heart"?
Remind me not to fly in any plane you design.
I agree. He is a Con Artist.
I listened to several of icke's TH-cam videos.
I got sucked in like so many do. & found myself repeating to others, some of the things he claims about the monarchy. About Lizard beings etc.
I believe David icke is a High range Overt Narcissist & a Genius
The traits he shows & how he presents, How easily he lies & continues repeating same things over & over for 30+ years, being unable to change.
I think he is a Lunatic.
He's scaring a lot of people & many are elderly & young teens.
Has a net worth of $10,000,000,000. That's in Pounds Sterling.
He certainly comes across as very narcissistic. I think he can be viewed as a failed 'messiah'. Someone who never managed to get the following he believes he deserves. But I don't think he's a genius. He just knows what his audience wants to hear.
Rockerfeller gave billions to charity
@outlaw87100 Eh? Excuse me you haven't answered my question. I gave you link which concerns a "charity" called Common Purpose, which provides training courses across the UK and on those courses allegedly uses NLP on people without their consent - changing their beliefs without them knowing and screwing with their heads. Now, I assume you're open minded about all this, so I'm also assuming you watched the link I gave. Now, I'll ask you again. What do you think of Common Purpose?
James Bunham codified these ideas in his book "The Managerial Revolution". I think you can find a copy online for free. I know I did.
If you've read George Orwell's 1984, you've already had a whiff of hi ideas. Burnham and Orwell had once been friends, but Burnham's ideas on managerialsim casued a break between them. Orwell used Burnham's ideas as the basis for the villain O'Brien.
@PeteFD1986
I assume when you mean "Neuro-linguistic Programming" you mean touchy fluffy stuff like classic phrases like "‘driving synergies", "‘out of the box thinking", "move the lens" "“Lets touch base” “Lets get a dialogue going” and other management bullshit.
If this is an attempt to take over the world, then it isn't working. I fell asleep last time I went to one of these training sessions.....
@D0W666 Na, just a peer reviewed and respect historian.
Your explanation about who is using what...made it easier for me to understand things. In MY country he would be probably labeled a right-winger...because he flirted with the Nazis and some of their ideas.
But I guess this labels don't suit him well.
Nevertheless I feel like he was very successful turning once normal person into guys who admire fascist ideas, refuse the modern world and hide in the woods to look out for UN helicpoters.
I think that is sad for conservatives and liberals.
@dopplereffeckt675
It seems so strange, that even though information (official and otherwise) is easier to get, that more people seem to fall back creating narrations that generally suit their own worldview. All it takes is to pop down your local museum or library and ask to see archive records of your topic of choice.
I am sure the British Museum or the National Archives has information regarding Rothchilds, so you can also read some of his stuff directly.
There it is!? The waft and whiff of Illuminati?
icke is so not mad thats funny
hmmm... dubious, it depends. do you mean he gave $900 million by todays value?
Well there you have it, they dont care, they just like to complain about vast ammouts of cheap energy/supersize meals/how much they havent got.
A serious war/disease, etc is needed to give many poeple a reference point.
I guess Mullins would be happy to see his theories that omnipresent on YT.
Assuming that you know a lot about that topic may I ask a question?
Why is that "Federal Reserve System" topic such a big deal for right-wingers like Mullins?
Maybe I misunderstand what being "right-winger" means in America because I'am from europe. But as far as I know having a small and not so powerful state is a basic idea of american conservatives. Why do these people want the state to control the currency?
@TheLasVegasElite
Have you read Operation Northwood documentation? I have, and its not quite what you think......
You know that in the 80' he declared himself jesus and that the world was gonna end.
@Incognitoification1 Yes, you've stated that you've such little confidence in your own 'understanding' that you are unable to debate the rational and realistic basis for that 'understanding'. I think that someone who has INDEPENDENTLY researched events, individuals and bloodlines for 20 plus years has a greater IMPARTIAL awareness than that of some 'Yale' boys who are part of the 'education' repitition system. It's ok, don't be afraid, think for yourself :)
BOOM!
@Incognitoification1 People are infallible not theories. Try to remember that truth springs from doubt. Who do you follow - those who claim to have the truth or those who seek it?
You may feel patronised by people who have researched the evidence for themselves rather than relying entirely on biased sources but that is your problem not someone elses.
How can you dismiss all such ideas? If the sky is blue and a CT theorist says so, is it any less blue because a conspiracy theorist said it?
@dopplereffeckt675 If you value a curious mind why do you mock? The beginning of wisdom is found in doubting; by doubting we come to question, and by seeking we may stumble upon the truth. There are two ways to slide easily through life: to believe everything or to doubt everything; both ways save us from thinking. It is not bigotry to be certain we are right; but it is bigotry to be unable to imagine how we might possibly have gone wrong. If you're not confused, you're not paying attention.
@arsenalrule2001uk
I was thinking after you have a go at him I was gonna get it a whirl.
Another thing the term "conspiracy theorist"is a loaded word.The connotation it musters is do to what we learned in the pass through repetition(the media).
Therefore merely uttering the word "conspiracy theory"it guides the audience in a predictable direction.(as the readers of this page subconsciously or consciously agree with me.)
What about the Balfour declaration?
@mikeyo1234
Historians can then piece together all the information from these various sources and give an account of why an event took place.
CT theorists tend to focus in on one piece of evidence for example the Operation Northwood document, and tend to forget the context which that document was produced- in this case the Cuban Crisis in the early 60's.
Today with the freedom of information act, anybody can obtain documents or undergo research. I do it as part of my job.
(cont)
oooo being block by
@TheLasVegasElite
I think that would roughly equate to about $200,000 USD per year, not including guest speaker events. Where does he keep his money? In the piggy bank? In a cookie Jar?
Again my hunch is that he to also uses the same institutions that are controlling the world. I gather his ex wife runs his media affairs, how else can he afford to fly around the world to over 40 countries.
See its little things like that give the game away. CT is Big Business now, almost Corporate.....
@dopplereffeckt675 Is that how we found out that the world was round? By rational thought and the 'ability to tell fact from fiction' or was it through doubting the commonly held 'fact' that the world was flat? Doubting IS ESSENTIAL. No need to get personal, i am not the first to understand that truth comes from doubt. To have doubted one's own first principles is the mark of a civilized man. The trouble with the world is that the stupid are so confident while the intelligent are full of doubt.
@dopplereffeckt675 When a person speaks to you, listen to him carefully and with respect -- but do not believe him. Never put your trust into anything but your own intellect. No matter whether he has gray hair or not, no matter whether he is a Nobel laureate -- may be wrong. The world progresses, year by year, century by century, as the members of the younger generation find out what was wrong among the things that their elders said. So you must always be skeptical -- always think for yourself.
@Incognitoification1 Well that's good because i'm not a conspiracy theorist, i'm a truth seeker. Will you debate with me? Or only with people that agree with you! I only engage in impartial, empirically assessed debates without the need for mockery. So, you think Bin Laden was responsible?
Unfortunately for whom? Speak for yourself x}
@mcwolfus What choice do I have? Shall i walk/ swim to the amazon with a spear? Answer the question.
@dopplereffeckt675 'Education? Peer Review? Evidence Based Research' What is your view of applying your ideas to a historical revisionist approach of the 'holocaust' which to this day is cited as the reason for Zionism and the genocide taking place in Palestine today. Start the process and you realise 'truth' is being blocked and discredited, only certain authorised personnel can provide any revision of these world changing events (whatever they were) Or have you got all the 'facts' you need?
It is very correct that the Rothschild were born Bauer. This is documented.
@Incognitoification1 Also, 'discredited' by whom i ask? The very people who fund the universities that promote this 'happy' research. Quote me a single INDEPENDENT researcher who rationally and adequately 'discredits' any commonly accepted alternative suggestions. Don't cloak your impotence with righteousness!
@outlaw87100 Oh really. Okay then...what do you think of Common Purpose? th-cam.com/video/cl3hT0ghdRs/w-d-xo.html
@PeteFD1986
Common Purpose is a left wing think tank, with links with the Labour Party.
Your point?
@Mathaius833 No each individual is respossible for a tiny part of what happens in the world.
There does appear to be a need in some personalities to require a kind of imaginary evil foe as an explaination for there failings.
@mcwolfus Watch 'collapse'.
@Broooose with all respect , you either very naive or an agent
@dopplereffeckt675 Firstly, it appears necessary to state that the word individual and independent have a different meaning lol Niall Ferguson (professor at Harvard Uni & now doing a bio on Henry Kissinger) very independent lmao Brian (tabloid favourite) Cox, also very independent lol Clearly it is you who does not understand education as, overwhelmingly in certain subjects, nothing more than indoctrination. 'Believe this or you fail'
@Incognitoification1 lmao come on then mate, lets have a debate :) You pick the topic and we'll see who offers the greatest degree of rationality from an IMPARTIAL, EMPIRICAL perspective. Go on, please, make my day lol You can lead a horse to water, you can't make it realise it's water lol
@outlaw87100 Same for you too 'debunker' lol What's your perspective? 'Bin Laden did it' lmao
DEniall
Ferguson just calls DI "mad" with a smug smile when in reality anyone who thinks Nial Ferguson is a relevant historian is "mad".
douglas reed
google that !
unlike icke he had true credibility
@plenty2see
Yawn.............
I see the tin foil hat has done wonders for your spelling. I suggest going back to school, and learning some history, or (gulp) English....
@DiamondDWable Sometimes I have to abbreviate, or kinda toy w/ the spelling of words, in order to fit them all into 1 comment spot (due to character limits). And, as far as punctuation goes, I prefer to ignore the rules & punctuate in my own personal manner. - So 2 best allow my writing 2 reflect the flow of my speech. (And folks r always telling me they get it, & can hear it as if I was saying it 2 them, when they read.. So it works!)
However, I get what u were referring 2 in comment above. ;)