Placing chess pieces in the center of the squares is a feature of the overly conscientious personality, those who worship symmetry. The compulsive behavior and attention to detail fosters intelligence. But Magnus is not OCPD because he posseses a secondary trait that balances his thinking, so his ability to view the game microscopically and with a wide angle simultaneously gives him a great advantage. A gift.
@@potirde Yes, OCD and a severe level of OCPD reflect some autistic features: but neither Kasparov nor Carlsen are autistic or suffer an axis II disordrer: they are too functional...but certainly a little overly conscientious (aka perfectionism/workaholism). I should know, being one.
They shouldn't be compared and there's a reason for that, magnus's style is highly inspired by kasparov. For instance, being late to a chess match and when you do arrive, you arrange your pieces
Its a person's own habit. Its part of their personality. Such a dumb thing to say that one is inspired to do certain thing. Can't two people have similar habits. You know both of them are genius in this field so their traits can match. These kinds of habits cannot be inspired. In world there is highter percentage of followers. They follow some unique personalities. Even the followers can only copy dressing style, diet, artstyle, cooking style, etc but cannot copy such habits. But one thing is to be noted that magnus memory is very good, and sometimes he sounds rude. But people who have unique personality don't have good memory, and they never sound rude. But people are made up of number of characteristics so may be magnus have all the qualities.
@@buneter It was not a joke. He meant to say that comparison should be done between equal opponents. It is wrong to compare two person in which one is inspired by other.
Especially because he's old enough to have had his childhood with the apex of analog technology (90s-early 2000s, starting from the 60s) but was too young to have had the exposure of the current world through the digital world and YT as we know it from 2005 onwards. Sure there was the old media but information wasn't as instant as it is now.
2:31 Dam, Magnus is 13 years old, playing the World Chess Champion, and he's just looking at some other game, not even thinking about his own game. That's a true Chess Grand Master right there.
That was an incredibly informative breakdown of the game for someone who understands the game at a basic level and is fascinated by its matches at a higher one.
But isn’t this video showing that Magnus has an edge ? When he was 13, I’m pretty sure we didn’t have stockfish and all the other tools available. So he was able to match the greatest by pure skill and intellect, at 13. He may have more tools at his disposition now, but he clearly didn’t back then.
Except that he has the time advantage, so it really doesn't show that he has an edge on equal footing. It just shows that the two players are of similar skill. To really say either of them is better than the other you would not only need them to have the same time available. Also, a player may be better at white or black. To really show if one player has the edge over the other you would need at least two games, with each player playing each color pieces, and without a time imbalance. (Even if the imbalance here was the fault of Kasparov)
He may have a slight time advantage but you should also consider the fact that the experience gap Kasparov had at the time is greater than Magnus. So can't we consider this an equal match between the two of them considering tge time and experience both of them had?
time advantage is given on purpose most of the time. These masterminds know that their brain works differently with the pressure of showing up late.@@kg4wwn
It’s a tale as old as time! The new learn from the old’s mistakes with the added advantage of the natural progression of educational opportunities. Technology has given magnus access to the best mentors and game footage from across the globe since he was a child. It’s a beautiful thing.
@@macin6931 Uh, no. It's actually bad. Makes no sense at all in some places. Just one of many examples at 4:40 : "Kasparov attacks Carlsen's back line, moving his rook to e1 and offering a trade". Offering a trade??? He captured a piece and Magnus has no choice but to take back. Another really bad example at 4:05 : "They trade pieces back and forth and Carlsen wins the exchange coming out a piece ahead". No such trades were made in the video at that time - not even any moves were made. Also, "wins the exchange" means that a knight/bishop was traded for a rook, and a "piece" usually means a bishop/knight (although sometimes it can refer to a rook). But, in fact, Magnus only won a pawn here. Sorry, but this is very bad terminology in a very bad commentary.
@@WKLNETWORK Garry trained Magnus in 2009 before he was world number 1. Trained Magnus for about a year. After that he became number 1 on the live ratings list.
it ruquires a lot of inteligence, for iexample i got better at computer games around 18 because i sterted to be able to think forward, the fact that he tied with him at the age 13 is amazing and i dont even play chess, i know the rules and played few times, but when i watch the pro matches i cant even comperhend whats goin on
I’ve played chess for 5 years and won our college chess competition my junior and senior years and many people tell me I can compete with the top chess players. It is my focus and I think I could at the minimum get a draw with top champions and win some of the time.
My brain is like that. Advanced. I live LIFE 2-3 MINUTES ahead of time. Basically, I can see the future. EXTREMELY RARE. I also lift weights - Free weights and not machines and there is a HUGE difference between the two. I have never met my equal mentally or physically.
@@johndor7890 try rubber bands and nautilus machines different muscle fibers, watch "pumping iron movie".....if your really smart you graduated high school early, i graduated high school at 12yo....at CALTECH i met 6 to 10yo that graduated high school!!! they are way smart!!!...next..play a game of 3 level chess board.....next join a chess club or park in your area, see how you do.....next, play 2 dimension to 3 dimension games, the what does the drawing on a piece of paper look like and formed into 4 dimesions look like... your SAT / PSAT / MCAT/ LSAT test scores should be high 98%+ scores. all my life my test scores have been 99.9999%....take the "MENSA" test..
As a chess instructor, I use this game to illustrate good opening principles and chess notation. I can also say that I've been in the same room at different times as both of these men.
Appreciate the video, I just subscribed. For future videos, it's kind of hard to follow the game visually when the chessboard is zooming in and out. Would papreciate it if it just stayed in the corner.
That's right, there were two other games, one played on the same day and one the day before. Kasparov played as white in both of those games and won. The openings were the King's Indian Defense and the English. Kasparov was famous for the King's Indian. I'm not sure if that was the best choice for young Carlsen
Do you think if Kasparov has played in this era of chess engines he could not be the best? Magnus and Gary are two great players in different eras. But I have to give credit to Gary because he played in the time when there was no advanced chess engines to analyze games. He is still my goat.
This was in 2004, back when most if not all home-available chess engines were hundreds of elo points weaker than Kasparov. Realistically, when they played this match, Kasparov had access to far better engines to practice against than Magnus, who was only 13 years old.
computers changed everything in the mid 90s. The ability to easily study 1000s of games gives a huge advantage, this on top of AI that can easily beat Magnus and teaches you the best moves. A much bigger part of chess now is memorization rather than creativity than it was for kasparov or fischer.
Kasparov is 59 not 54. You said the clocks were ticking down even though Magnus had not yet made a move. If they were ticking then Magnus would be loosing time not Kasparov.
Him and many others. Hard to say if they would be better than Magnus. Magnus is amazing, but Garry would have a good chance. Garry had an unbelievable career. Magnus believes Garry is the GOAT still today, and I understand why.
The fact a 13 year old could even get to a draw with Kasparov is amazing but lets not forget a draw is a win for black. Kasparov won, but it really sets the spotlight on how talented Magnus was, and just how much potential he had at that time.
"In 2009, Magnus hired Kasparov as a coach. During their sessions, they played many training games. According to Magnus himself, he won the majority of those, although he never revealed a specific score." The cool thing about chess is that players only get better as they get older; unlike physical competitions. So its a good way to know that our current champions are really all time champions. We dont really have to spend time theorizing about players in their hypothetical primes. Players only get better and better over time.
That is not true at all, the older a person gets the worse he plays. Exactly like muscles the brains starts to decay. You can see that clearly in chess statistics. That is why some GMs resign at their peak.
This is why this commentary is bad on so many levels and you shouldn´t listen to what this guy says: 1:30 ``Magnus moves his next pawn to c4, instantly threatening the black pawn´´ - this move is by far not that dramatic, it´s just a pawn move, 90% of chess openings start with pawn moves to the center, in chess there are also no ´instant´ treats, just treats, otherwise there would also be delayed treats, and that´s not a thing. 2:01 ``Kasparov moves his queen on a5, which pins the knight, this forces Magnus to defend the pin`` - you can´t defend a pin, as a pin is not an attack, Magnus also didn´t have to ``defend´´ the pin, moving the other knight to d2 or better said, he didn´t have to remove the pin, worst case scenario he would´ve lost a pawn, Magnus did that to bring the piece closer to the blacks queen, he also defend the pawn on c4 and he also had a nice move after that, knight to b3 attacking the queen, removing her from that juicy square, it just happened to remove the pin from the knight on c3. 2:16 ``Kasparov moves his bishop on b4, reinforcing the pin again`` - he just said a second ago, Magnus ´defended´ the pin, this guy has no idea what he´s talking about, there is no pin anymore. 2:22 ``Magnus moved his queen to defend the knight´´ - the knight was defended by the pawn on b2, he moved the queen actually to protect the pawn and not give it for free. 2:32 ``He took the pawn taking control of the center´´ - taking that pawn doesn´t grand control over the center. 2:37 ``Magnus forks the queen and the pawn´´ well it might be a fork, but that´s not why Magnus did that, the pawn could´ve been captured anyway as it was not defended. Magnus did that just to kick the queen away. This is called an inbetween move. 3:16 ``Magnus is in danger of a check´´ - that check is by far not that dangerous, the danger was actually giving Kasparov a free pawn, and not just any pawn, the pawn that protects the king. 3:23 ``If somehow Kasparov could get his queen over to h2, it would be an instant check mate´´ - there is no way Kasparov could get that queen over to h2, queens can´t teleport or jump over pieces. If SOMEHOW this guy would read some chess rules before doing voice overs, maybe this video wouldn´t sound so stupid. 3:31 ``Luckly Magnus sees this move and pushes his pawn forward to h3 creating some breathing room´´ - no no no, he didn´t create any breathing room, the queen and bishop still eyes the h2 square, so the white king wouldn't be able to move there even if it wanted to. He moved the pawn to protect it, otherwise it would`ve been lost. 3:43 ``Magnus is forced to move without capturing due to the queen directly threatening the same square.´´ - this guy literally thinks the bishop could´ve been captured XD. NO bro! Magnus could´ve not captured the bishop as it was protected by the queen, that would´ve been an illegal move. It was actually Magnus's only move. 4:01 ``Moves multiple pieces forward to attack c6´´ - it´s not wrong, it´s just called putting pressure on the pawn on c6 4:05 ``The pawn looks like it´s in big trouble`` - this guy is so dramatic XD, nobody talks like this. 4:10 ``Coming out a piece ahead´´ - Magnus won a pawn is what he´s trying to say 4:15 ``Threatens to trade his knight for the rook´´ - Magnus just threatens the rook, giving a knight for a rook is not a trade, as rooks are more valuable. 4:18 ``At this point in the game, Magnus has a very active and aggressive position´´ - he does indeed, but i feel he should also explain why. Magnus' pieces are on enemy territory, also black didnt´t developed it´s white square bishop and the rooks aren´t connected, that´s why Magnus has an advantage. 4:27 ``Kasparov moves his queen to g6´´ - that´s actually e6 not g6, and there is no check threat, like none at all. I don´t know where chatGPT got this from, sorry I mean this youtuber. 4:43 This one is interesting: `` Kasparov attacks Carlsen back line, moving his rook to e1 and offering a trade´´ so actually there is no atack on the ´´back line´´ - or even the back rank how it is actually called, but Magnus is in this case the one that offers a trade of rooks, by moving to bishop, not Kasparov. 4:49 ``They are extremly close to an endgame`` - this is the endgame allready, the middle game usually end when there are 3 or less major pieces left on the board. 4:56 ``Handing out checks to each other left and right´´ - wtf does that even mean XD and also there are no checks at this point XD Btw, drawing the world champion at that age is a win for Carlsen, just saying.
@@kz-jo6bd This has been the modus operandi for MC. The reasoning behind it is simple: "chess is about making clever moves - not about who can keep appointments".
BTW, Kasparov play Carlsen 4 times with 3 of the games was during this tournament - 2004 Keykjavik Rapid. The first game between them occured during the 16 player round robin tournament. Kasparov defeated Carlson in round 10 in only 21 moves. Kasparov came in 2nd with a score of 12/15 and Carlsen finished 15th with a score of 4/15. The game in the video is their 2nd game which occured during the 1st game of the 1st round of the 16 player knockout tournament. During the round they played two rapid games with a 25+5 time control. Kasparov won 1.5 to 0.5. Kasparov won the knockout tournament. BTW, if the score is tied after two games, a sudden death blitz game (5 min + 3 sec) would have been played. Their 4th game was in 2020 during the Champions Showdown Chess 9LX. 57-year old Kasparov made a cameo appearance and played as White in a 55-move draw against Carlsen. So lifetime score - Kasparov +2-0=2 // Carlsen +0-2=2
Magnus vs Kasparov is like MJ vs Lebron. The modern player is obviously better but if you want to value the achievements of the older player you can definitely make an argument for it.
MJ vs Kobe probably works better since MJ helped Kobe learn a couple of things and basically "passing the torch" just like how Kasparov did with Magnus
I have seen both MJ and Lebron play. A lot. I grew up in Chicago and watched a ton of the Bulls championship seasons. I've seen Lebron play a lot as well. He is a great player undoubtedly. But to suggest that the modern player is better is absolutely laughable. MJ would average 50 points a game in today's game. Players like Barkley have said as much. There is no comparison. And it isn't close, either. Lebron is of course great, but in one of MJ's first games at Madison Square Garden, he got a standing ovation from NY fans at the end of the game, b/c the whole crowd was like "holy shit, I've never seen anybody do THAT." MJ is the GOAT. I'm not even a huge MJ fan, I know he was kind of an a-hole a lot of the time. I don't give people a free pass to treat people badly just b/c they're great at a sport. So this isn't really a biased account from a Bulls or MJ fan, I don't like MJ as much as I used to after seeing "The Last Dance". But as a basketball player MJ was way better than Lebron. I think Kobe might have been better than Lebron as well, honestly.
1:17 has he lost so much time on the clock? He's playing black and Magnus has yet to move a piece and start the clock. Later on you can see how Magnus has 3 minutes and Kasparov has 10.
It is really amazing game from Carlsen, but I think at this time. Kasparov barely have meet younger like Carlsen was here. And he was for sure think this game will be a peace of cake. Kasparov was only playing those top players around the world and was not compete in those open tournament like Carlsen doing. But I truly now Kasparov is 1 of the biggest legend ever playing chess without a doubt.
what if you scroll back up and challenge that sub button
how do you have under 1k subs and make this well edited video
@@Drag0n_k It's only been 5 days and his subs have doubled since
@@Drag0n_k honestly 500k views with 3k subs wtf are those numbers. Very good video
@@artek0050 it was 3 weeks ago it had only 950 subs and 1k views when I put the comment
I'd have to love very outdated games to do that
I love that you can see Kasparov waking himself up a bit halfway through as he realises how good Magnus really is.
He like who is the kid vibes.
I love it how even at 13 he still does his usual routine of adjusting all the pieces before he makes a move, something he still does today
He got it from kasparov, one of his biggest inspirations
Placing chess pieces in the center of the squares is a feature of the overly conscientious personality, those who worship symmetry. The compulsive behavior and attention to detail fosters intelligence. But Magnus is not OCPD because he posseses a secondary trait that balances his thinking, so his ability to view the game microscopically and with a wide angle simultaneously gives him a great advantage. A gift.
Autism/OCD. And seen it from Kasparov.
@@potirde Yes, OCD and a severe level of OCPD reflect some autistic features: but neither Kasparov nor Carlsen are autistic or suffer an axis II disordrer: they are too functional...but certainly a little overly conscientious (aka perfectionism/workaholism). I should know, being one.
pretty much all chess players do that
They shouldn't be compared and there's a reason for that, magnus's style is highly inspired by kasparov. For instance, being late to a chess match and when you do arrive, you arrange your pieces
I think Bobby Fischer did that.
Its a person's own habit. Its part of their personality. Such a dumb thing to say that one is inspired to do certain thing. Can't two people have similar habits. You know both of them are genius in this field so their traits can match. These kinds of habits cannot be inspired. In world there is highter percentage of followers. They follow some unique personalities. Even the followers can only copy dressing style, diet, artstyle, cooking style, etc but cannot copy such habits.
But one thing is to be noted that magnus memory is very good, and sometimes he sounds rude. But people who have unique personality don't have good memory, and they never sound rude. But people are made up of number of characteristics so may be magnus have all the qualities.
@@dishadhouliyan5190 true
@@dishadhouliyan5190 it was a joke
@@buneter It was not a joke. He meant to say that comparison should be done between equal opponents. It is wrong to compare two person in which one is inspired by other.
This Magnus kid did pretty well. He should continue playing chess. I'm sure he will have a good future in it.
I agree
hes alright ig
He might become maybe a FIDE master or maybe a 2000
… he is literally world champion rn bro
@@BasbbaaSysgsys thats the joke, that went over your head
Magnus is definitely a born genius. There is no way he had enough exposure at that age to draw Gary Casparov
Especially because he's old enough to have had his childhood with the apex of analog technology (90s-early 2000s, starting from the 60s) but was too young to have had the exposure of the current world through the digital world and YT as we know it from 2005 onwards. Sure there was the old media but information wasn't as instant as it is now.
2:31 Dam, Magnus is 13 years old, playing the World Chess Champion, and he's just looking at some other game, not even thinking about his own game. That's a true Chess Grand Master right there.
I do that during my school exams
@@dipalibaul9120 But you can't draw a school exam
@@Gomace I’d see it as getting the same exact grade on it as your overall grade for the class
@@joe5942 Passing is winning, though.
@@Gomace true
This is crazy that he was able to match up to the number 1 player at the time absolutely amazing 🤩
he got time advantage tho
@@ycee8629 no he didnt
@@ycee8629 that’s where you’re wrong. And Kasparov being late don’t matter shite
If you study the board you will see that he would have won if he had more time.
@@mariusbelisle3494 He did
Magnus:chills
Garry Kasparov:having a mental breakdown
Kasparov always acts like this, there was no breakdown and he won 3 games against Magnus 2,5 - 0,5
That was an incredibly informative breakdown of the game for someone who understands the game at a basic level and is fascinated by its matches at a higher one.
For someone who unscreens the game at more than a basic level, it was a mess of an analysis. Was this video scripted and spoken by AI?
Guess Magnus learned one major thing about being the best: Never show up on time 😂
Plus arrange your pieces to piss them off and give them mental instability
@@octobsession3061 Then do a prayer at the end 😂
musashi is shrugging in his grave
This kid really has a great future at chess
bro what the heck he is magnus carlsen he is the grandmaster of chess now
@@bhavanipakki3524 R/ Woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh
@@bhavanipakki3524 R/Whoooooosh
@@bhavanipakki3524 wow is he? I really admire your sense of humor
@@chickadeelittle588 @Blue Lanterns oh okok
So Magnus learned one thing well from the great Kasparov: how to arrive stylishly late to a chess game. 😂
Wow this Kasparov Guy manages to draw with Magnus👏
He's not some guy, he is one of the greatest player.
@@thesolaremperor3740 someone missed sarcasm class.
@@thesolaremperor3740 he's the kasparov guy
@@ashupashu5559 I see
@@thesolaremperor3740 My child you only look, but you cannot see.
I love how Kaspárov came late and now Magnus always comes late
0:53. That is Boris Spassky (L) with Bobby Fischer (R), not Gary Gasparov!
But isn’t this video showing that Magnus has an edge ? When he was 13, I’m pretty sure we didn’t have stockfish and all the other tools available. So he was able to match the greatest by pure skill and intellect, at 13. He may have more tools at his disposition now, but he clearly didn’t back then.
Except that he has the time advantage, so it really doesn't show that he has an edge on equal footing. It just shows that the two players are of similar skill. To really say either of them is better than the other you would not only need them to have the same time available. Also, a player may be better at white or black. To really show if one player has the edge over the other you would need at least two games, with each player playing each color pieces, and without a time imbalance. (Even if the imbalance here was the fault of Kasparov)
It just shows that some people are built different and all we can do is idolize them in our pathetic lives lmfao
he was 13 so how many years did he have to use those tools?
He may have a slight time advantage but you should also consider the fact that the experience gap Kasparov had at the time is greater than Magnus. So can't we consider this an equal match between the two of them considering tge time and experience both of them had?
time advantage is given on purpose most of the time. These masterminds know that their brain works differently with the pressure of showing up late.@@kg4wwn
3:00 ... Karpov enjoying this.
Why wasn’t it mentioned that Kasparov and Carlsen played three games in this event, and that Kasparov won 2,5 - 0,5 over Carlsen?
because it was magnus at his 13 years old????
@@InsanityKillstreak because it's clickbait
to be fair carlsen was 13, did you expect a 13 year old to win 9-5 over kasparov
@@chriscohen4287 well, it's clickbait if you know nothing about chess
Because that makes the story less interesting
It’s a tale as old as time! The new learn from the old’s mistakes with the added advantage of the natural progression of educational opportunities. Technology has given magnus access to the best mentors and game footage from across the globe since he was a child. It’s a beautiful thing.
Great Video, I think this style is a much more approachable way of showing Chess games compared to a lot of other Chess TH-camrs.
Really? "If the queen goes to h2 it is an instant checkmate" how, by teleporting? "Luckily he has seen that", it's just lazy
@@mateusz2684 thats exactly what I mean. Its not so specific and by extension not so complicated. It gives a general Idea of the plan and its merit.
@@mateusz2684 The sentence structure is so weird in certain places I'm almost certain it was written by AI
@@macin6931 Uh, no. It's actually bad. Makes no sense at all in some places. Just one of many examples at 4:40 : "Kasparov attacks Carlsen's back line, moving his rook to e1 and offering a trade". Offering a trade??? He captured a piece and Magnus has no choice but to take back.
Another really bad example at 4:05 : "They trade pieces back and forth and Carlsen wins the exchange coming out a piece ahead". No such trades were made in the video at that time - not even any moves were made. Also, "wins the exchange" means that a knight/bishop was traded for a rook, and a "piece" usually means a bishop/knight (although sometimes it can refer to a rook). But, in fact, Magnus only won a pawn here.
Sorry, but this is very bad terminology in a very bad commentary.
@@johnmerlino581 why @ me? Nothing of what you said relates to what I said I liked about it xD
after that match kasparov flew to norway to train him for a week...and magnus really took off after that :) know that story well
Magnus train Kasparov or the other way round?
@@WKLNETWORK Garry trained Magnus in 2009 before he was world number 1. Trained Magnus for about a year. After that he became number 1 on the live ratings list.
its really nice of Carlson to show that old guy how to play chess.
You are a really good narrator/commentator, I'm a total noob in chess and this was very easy to follow, thanks!
The voice is AI. Agree that the content is great.
The commentator is also a chess noob.
Magnus was looking at games on other tables while he played Gary
The intense commentary is everything. I love it
"Luckily he sees this move" ...😂
I mean the commentary is top notch
This boy looks very passionate about chess, I hope he becomes a grandmaster and soon a world champion
You don’t know him now?
Or is this satire?
@@dcincco its a fucking joke
@@entrialof geez, calm down. I wasn’t sure.
@@dcincco There has to be one to say it
Legend has it that this kid went on to be a great diver
I watched this thinking it was from a large channel, only 128 subs is a crime
That’s where magnus got the coming late part from 😂
Your voice is entertaining, reminds me of the same voice in some of murakmi's audio books. ❤
I like how Anatonly Karpov is watching like "Yes, young Magnus yes... kick his ass for me!!!"
You beautifully edited this video like a True Crimes story. hard hitting. Fast paced. Instantly gripping.
Right
9/10: Great experience. A bit low on explosions and blood during action scenes.
But the actual text of the commentary is inane.
Bro was getting stressed out by Magnus😂 shook his head at least 50 times
Wow. A draw with Kasparov and Magnus was only 13. That says a lot about Magnus’ talent.
Very good video. Please keep such videos coming.
is this where magnus got the whole "show up late" thing?
One of the best chess narrations on TH-cam thanks.
I had a cheese burger for lunch today.
Wow, I really like this Channel😁 Keep on making videos for the like of us and chess community💯
We would be interstellar beings if magnus studied quantum physics
it ruquires a lot of inteligence, for iexample i got better at computer games around 18 because i sterted to be able to think forward, the fact that he tied with him at the age 13 is amazing and i dont even play chess, i know the rules and played few times, but when i watch the pro matches i cant even comperhend whats goin on
I’ve played chess for 5 years and won our college chess competition my junior and senior years and many people tell me I can compete with the top chess players. It is my focus and I think I could at the minimum get a draw with top champions and win some of the time.
unlikely, most world class players are 7 moves ahead,...and or can play against 100 people at the same time..thier brains are literally different
My brain is like that. Advanced. I live LIFE 2-3 MINUTES ahead of time. Basically, I can see the future.
EXTREMELY RARE.
I also lift weights - Free weights and not machines and there is a HUGE difference between the two.
I have never met my equal mentally or physically.
@@johndor7890 try rubber bands and nautilus machines different muscle fibers, watch "pumping iron movie".....if your really smart you graduated high school early, i graduated high school at 12yo....at CALTECH i met 6 to 10yo that graduated high school!!! they are way smart!!!...next..play a game of 3 level chess board.....next join a chess club or park in your area, see how you do.....next, play 2 dimension to 3 dimension games, the what does the drawing on a piece of paper look like and formed into 4 dimesions look like... your SAT / PSAT / MCAT/ LSAT test scores should be high 98%+ scores. all my life my test scores have been 99.9999%....take the "MENSA" test..
@@johndor7890 7 moves ahead , means 3EXP7 = 2187 simple move posibilities!!
Living LIFE ahead requires more cognitive ability and acumen.
Plus, I lift free weights.
Never met my equal.
Reality.
it's crazy to think that Kasparov manage to draw this game.
The only time when magnus is earlier than his opponent - now he's doing what Kasparov did by arriving later than the opponent
As a chess instructor, I use this game to illustrate good opening principles and chess notation. I can also say that I've been in the same room at different times as both of these men.
Notice
The Pepsi near magnus in the thumbnail is yellow😳
woah, that kasparov guy almost beat magnus
i'd say if he spent more time playing chess he could even overtake him
Appreciate the video, I just subscribed. For future videos, it's kind of hard to follow the game visually when the chessboard is zooming in and out. Would papreciate it if it just stayed in the corner.
If u see good the clock is ticking for magnus not for kasparok 😳
Computers a little better these days...Messi versus Pelé
Wow this Russian dude tied with Magnus
This action movie deserves a like
Had me hooked for the full duration of the video and I don’t play chess. 👍
1:04 only one game? why tf you lying, they played at least 3 games that magnus lost 2 of them and draw one
That's right, there were two other games, one played on the same day and one the day before. Kasparov played as white in both of those games and won. The openings were the King's Indian Defense and the English. Kasparov was famous for the King's Indian. I'm not sure if that was the best choice for young Carlsen
This is like a grade schooler fighting Tyson Fury to a split decision.
Do you think if Kasparov has played in this era of chess engines he could not be the best? Magnus and Gary are two great players in different eras. But I have to give credit to Gary because he played in the time when there was no advanced chess engines to analyze games. He is still my goat.
This was in 2004, back when most if not all home-available chess engines were hundreds of elo points weaker than Kasparov. Realistically, when they played this match, Kasparov had access to far better engines to practice against than Magnus, who was only 13 years old.
Depends. If you took prime Kasparov, i think he may get top 20, but if he had the same tools as GMs these days, he would for sure be top 2
Hopefully the Murkekos Stars game will get similar talented players in the future.
It’s like watching young Kratos fight Ares. He loses because he’s too young and small but years later he defeats him and takes his title
Yea lol
Thirteen year old Magnus looked like a complete menace
computers changed everything in the mid 90s. The ability to easily study 1000s of games gives a huge advantage, this on top of AI that can easily beat Magnus and teaches you the best moves. A much bigger part of chess now is memorization rather than creativity than it was for kasparov or fischer.
So all Magnus did between 1 year old to 13 years old was memorize plays? I get your point but this doesn't apply to Magnus.
Magnus is the best chess player that the world has ever seen or will ever again see anytime soon in the future
Kasparov is 59 not 54. You said the clocks were ticking down even though Magnus had not yet made a move. If they were ticking then Magnus would be loosing time not Kasparov.
Is this the reason why Magnus arrived late sometimes. He knew the psychological effect
If Kasparov would have had the technology of this era, he would have been a real compute engine on the board.
Him and many others. Hard to say if they would be better than Magnus. Magnus is amazing, but Garry would have a good chance. Garry had an unbelievable career. Magnus believes Garry is the GOAT still today, and I understand why.
Is this where Magnus learned to arrive late lol.
The fact a 13 year old could even get to a draw with Kasparov is amazing but lets not forget a draw is a win for black. Kasparov won, but it really sets the spotlight on how talented Magnus was, and just how much potential he had at that time.
This match was unforgettable, thank you for sharing video
I wonder what ever happened to Magnus. He seemed to have a bright future in chess.
“The Norwegian giant, current world chess champion” haha
intense commentary, little over the top but, well done anyways
Bro nice video and your only at 988 subs thats crazy keep up the good work
"In 2009, Magnus hired Kasparov as a coach. During their sessions, they played many training games. According to Magnus himself, he won the majority of those, although he never revealed a specific score." The cool thing about chess is that players only get better as they get older; unlike physical competitions. So its a good way to know that our current champions are really all time champions. We dont really have to spend time theorizing about players in their hypothetical primes. Players only get better and better over time.
That is not true at all, the older a person gets the worse he plays. Exactly like muscles the brains starts to decay. You can see that clearly in chess statistics. That is why some GMs resign at their peak.
Totally false, players decline as they age.
This is why this commentary is bad on so many levels and you shouldn´t listen to what this guy says:
1:30 ``Magnus moves his next pawn to c4, instantly threatening the black pawn´´ - this move is by far not that dramatic, it´s just a pawn move, 90% of chess openings start with pawn moves to the center, in chess there are also no ´instant´ treats, just treats, otherwise there would also be delayed treats, and that´s not a thing.
2:01 ``Kasparov moves his queen on a5, which pins the knight, this forces Magnus to defend the pin`` - you can´t defend a pin, as a pin is not an attack, Magnus also didn´t have to ``defend´´ the pin, moving the other knight to d2 or better said, he didn´t have to remove the pin, worst case scenario he would´ve lost a pawn, Magnus did that to bring the piece closer to the blacks queen, he also defend the pawn on c4 and he also had a nice move after that, knight to b3 attacking the queen, removing her from that juicy square, it just happened to remove the pin from the knight on c3.
2:16 ``Kasparov moves his bishop on b4, reinforcing the pin again`` - he just said a second ago, Magnus ´defended´ the pin, this guy has no idea what he´s talking about, there is no pin anymore.
2:22 ``Magnus moved his queen to defend the knight´´ - the knight was defended by the pawn on b2, he moved the queen actually to protect the pawn and not give it for free.
2:32 ``He took the pawn taking control of the center´´ - taking that pawn doesn´t grand control over the center.
2:37 ``Magnus forks the queen and the pawn´´ well it might be a fork, but that´s not why Magnus did that, the pawn could´ve been captured anyway as it was not defended. Magnus did that just to kick the queen away. This is called an inbetween move.
3:16 ``Magnus is in danger of a check´´ - that check is by far not that dangerous, the danger was actually giving Kasparov a free pawn, and not just any pawn, the pawn that protects the king.
3:23 ``If somehow Kasparov could get his queen over to h2, it would be an instant check mate´´ - there is no way Kasparov could get that queen over to h2, queens can´t teleport or jump over pieces. If SOMEHOW this guy would read some chess rules before doing voice overs, maybe this video wouldn´t sound so stupid.
3:31 ``Luckly Magnus sees this move and pushes his pawn forward to h3 creating some breathing room´´ - no no no, he didn´t create any breathing room, the queen and bishop still eyes the h2 square, so the white king wouldn't be able to move there even if it wanted to. He moved the pawn to protect it, otherwise it would`ve been lost.
3:43 ``Magnus is forced to move without capturing due to the queen directly threatening the same square.´´ - this guy literally thinks the bishop could´ve been captured XD. NO bro! Magnus could´ve not captured the bishop as it was protected by the queen, that would´ve been an illegal move. It was actually Magnus's only move.
4:01 ``Moves multiple pieces forward to attack c6´´ - it´s not wrong, it´s just called putting pressure on the pawn on c6
4:05 ``The pawn looks like it´s in big trouble`` - this guy is so dramatic XD, nobody talks like this.
4:10 ``Coming out a piece ahead´´ - Magnus won a pawn is what he´s trying to say
4:15 ``Threatens to trade his knight for the rook´´ - Magnus just threatens the rook, giving a knight for a rook is not a trade, as rooks are more valuable.
4:18 ``At this point in the game, Magnus has a very active and aggressive position´´ - he does indeed, but i feel he should also explain why. Magnus' pieces are on enemy territory, also black didnt´t developed it´s white square bishop and the rooks aren´t connected, that´s why Magnus has an advantage.
4:27 ``Kasparov moves his queen to g6´´ - that´s actually e6 not g6, and there is no check threat, like none at all. I don´t know where chatGPT got this from, sorry I mean this youtuber.
4:43 This one is interesting: `` Kasparov attacks Carlsen back line, moving his rook to e1 and offering a trade´´ so actually there is no atack on the ´´back line´´ - or even the back rank how it is actually called, but Magnus is in this case the one that offers a trade of rooks, by moving to bishop, not Kasparov.
4:49 ``They are extremly close to an endgame`` - this is the endgame allready, the middle game usually end when there are 3 or less major pieces left on the board.
4:56 ``Handing out checks to each other left and right´´ - wtf does that even mean XD and also there are no checks at this point XD
Btw, drawing the world champion at that age is a win for Carlsen, just saying.
This kid just got lucky.. he's good, but just like the other "prodigies" out there, his dream of becoming number 1 probably got crushed! Oh well..
He is now the breast of all time
He's the best Chess player alive
@@ainulislam5392
No way?! I don't believe you
@PureAwesommeness You're stupid he is the greatest chess player of all time winning 125 games in a row and he is an adult older than you weirdo
@@PureAwesomeMess you mom doesn’t believe you
So that's where Magnus picked up his habit of being late. It's Kasparov's tactic.
Just one comment, Kasparov didn't lose anytime for being late :/ idk why, maybe some respect for the highest level players?
no its Magnus turn first but he wait
@@Whatapick yeah respect for the highest level players
@@kz-jo6bd This has been the modus operandi for MC. The reasoning behind it is simple: "chess is about making clever moves - not about who can keep appointments".
If this channel existed back then the title would be “Kid beats word champion Garry Kasparov”
If he continues playing this way I'm sure he would become the world champion someday
Are u sure 😂
Nah see me beat him tomorrow 😌👌
no need to say that. He is the wc rn lol
3:49 bro kasparov was TRIPPIN lmao
"this 13 yr old kid really has the advantage.. wtf"
BTW, Kasparov play Carlsen 4 times with 3 of the games was during this tournament - 2004 Keykjavik Rapid.
The first game between them occured during the 16 player round robin tournament. Kasparov defeated Carlson in round 10 in only 21 moves. Kasparov came in 2nd with a score of 12/15 and Carlsen finished 15th with a score of 4/15.
The game in the video is their 2nd game which occured during the 1st game of the 1st round of the 16 player knockout tournament. During the round they played two rapid games with a 25+5 time control. Kasparov won 1.5 to 0.5. Kasparov won the knockout tournament. BTW, if the score is tied after two games, a sudden death blitz game (5 min + 3 sec) would have been played.
Their 4th game was in 2020 during the Champions Showdown Chess 9LX. 57-year old Kasparov made a cameo appearance and played as White in a 55-move draw against Carlsen.
So lifetime score - Kasparov +2-0=2 // Carlsen +0-2=2
So magnus just adopted the "late at the game" strat from Kasparov I guess
Magnus vs Kasparov is like MJ vs Lebron. The modern player is obviously better but if you want to value the achievements of the older player you can definitely make an argument for it.
I agree with you 100 percent but many people will disagree
MJ vs Kobe probably works better since MJ helped Kobe learn a couple of things and basically "passing the torch" just like how Kasparov did with Magnus
I have seen both MJ and Lebron play. A lot. I grew up in Chicago and watched a ton of the Bulls championship seasons. I've seen Lebron play a lot as well. He is a great player undoubtedly. But to suggest that the modern player is better is absolutely laughable. MJ would average 50 points a game in today's game. Players like Barkley have said as much. There is no comparison. And it isn't close, either. Lebron is of course great, but in one of MJ's first games at Madison Square Garden, he got a standing ovation from NY fans at the end of the game, b/c the whole crowd was like "holy shit, I've never seen anybody do THAT." MJ is the GOAT. I'm not even a huge MJ fan, I know he was kind of an a-hole a lot of the time. I don't give people a free pass to treat people badly just b/c they're great at a sport. So this isn't really a biased account from a Bulls or MJ fan, I don't like MJ as much as I used to after seeing "The Last Dance". But as a basketball player MJ was way better than Lebron. I think Kobe might have been better than Lebron as well, honestly.
Ah he learns the habit being late from casparov😂😂😂hats off to these two legend
So, that's where Magnus was inspired to arrive late.
Dude... the music. It's chess, not some cheesy Hollywood balls-to-the-wall action scene. Stop this.
Bro calm down, it’s just a TH-cam video. If you don’t like the content just leave
Cry about it
So what crybaby?
1:17 has he lost so much time on the clock? He's playing black and Magnus has yet to move a piece and start the clock. Later on you can see how Magnus has 3 minutes and Kasparov has 10.
It is really amazing game from Carlsen, but I think at this time. Kasparov barely have meet younger like Carlsen was here. And he was for sure think this game will be a peace of cake. Kasparov was only playing those top players around the world and was not compete in those open tournament like Carlsen doing. But I truly now Kasparov is 1 of the biggest legend ever playing chess without a doubt.
although i understand basic chess , the way you told the story and the music made me stay till the final second of the clip!
That was intense with the music and narration.
Magnus is insane
At 4:41, how is Kasparov slightly better due to the doubled pawns for white? White is literally up a pawn.
Position matters as well its not only about the pieces
Better than a 23 minute of Gotham Chess Screaming
Lmfao
Lol. But I do like his commentaries.
My man adpoted kaspros habit of comming late😂😂
No way Kasparov is 54. Kasparov looked 54 like 20 years ago
born in '63, that got my attention as well. He's 60 now.
He almost became a chess jedi...almost 😂
This Carlsen kid has a future and could go far 😂❤
thats 20 years back, holy cow its 2023!!
Annoying way the board keeps moving about the screen. Certainly put me off Subscribing. Good story, poorly told.
Now i understand why my parents used to tell me im a failure when i was teenager