You can always split the application into many small html files and use an html builder like: - Golang + Template - Python + jinja - rust + askama - spring + thymeleaf (I would recommend Golang + Template) It is not true at all that you lose the reusability of the components. I have tried it myself, you can move a lot of execution to the server side, so the page loading is very fast
i understand htmx's idea but i still prefer to do it manually with JS & Ajax, & mostly use the server templating engine for better seo & performance simple reason for that is htmx can conflict with other js libraries
What you said at the end is the essence. Htmx's biggest drawback is its lack of reusability, so when you have a very complex app with multiple pages, just using htmx could quickly become a nightmare. Its best possible use case is to augment SSR/REST APIs for react by reducing the need for complex server boilerplates or hooks.
that only applies to you production line devs building legos like a cog in a machine. it has incredible value in the world of freelance, believe it or not; not every app is some mangled aws setup with 1 million users. There's an entire small to midsize market that will see 5-10 version updates across a decade--write a spec, sign the contract, get paid - build it - deploy - see you in two years for a new module. this is mostly regurgitated talking points and completely disregards real development skills, i dont need a million trash tutorials i just need good docs and a stable API. goofy AI bot talk.
In theory yes. Web components' api feels very old and weird though, and it's hard to have web components talk to the rest the app because of their isolated design
@@pookiepats my point still stands, if your app is not a Shopify clone and only serves a couple thousands of users, then by all means go ahead and use htmx only. There's no either-or situation here. Rigidity is the death of code creativity.
winning? by what metric? github stars? even Svelete struggles to get traction. learn Angular/React/Vue if you want a job. or if you don't like that path try learning web components.
agree, almost no one using htmx on production. i can show which companies uses React/Angular/Vue. can anyone show me which companies uses HTMX on production?
Vue ist the WORST framework IT has developed in over 50 years (*)! Everything is in 1 huge .vue file! Angular is much cleaner. You can refactor out code. Based on real code I have seen from others.
At this point htmx functionalities should be included in the next html standard.
You can always split the application into many small html files and use an html builder like:
- Golang + Template
- Python + jinja
- rust + askama
- spring + thymeleaf
(I would recommend Golang + Template)
It is not true at all that you lose the reusability of the components.
I have tried it myself, you can move a lot of execution to the server side, so the page loading is very fast
django + htmx is a superpower 💪
Laravel + htmx is Love
Great video 👍 i would love a story about LLVM. Keep up 🎉
I would also like a video about llvm
Please also make a documentary about llvm
Thanks, I will consider it for future video 😊
@@CodeSource thank you
great presentation, thank you. htmx could become big
i understand htmx's idea but i still prefer to do it manually with JS & Ajax, & mostly use the server templating engine for better seo & performance
simple reason for that is htmx can conflict with other js libraries
Interesting Content 😮
Amazing video as always 💪
Beatiful animations! Please, what do you use as a software? Thank you.
Which software are you using to do animation and video editing?
After effects
What you said at the end is the essence. Htmx's biggest drawback is its lack of reusability, so when you have a very complex app with multiple pages, just using htmx could quickly become a nightmare. Its best possible use case is to augment SSR/REST APIs for react by reducing the need for complex server boilerplates or hooks.
that only applies to you production line devs building legos like a cog in a machine.
it has incredible value in the world of freelance, believe it or not; not every app is some mangled aws setup with 1 million users.
There's an entire small to midsize market that will see 5-10 version updates across a decade--write a spec, sign the contract, get paid - build it - deploy - see you in two years for a new module.
this is mostly regurgitated talking points and completely disregards real development skills, i dont need a million trash tutorials i just need good docs and a stable API.
goofy AI bot talk.
@@pookiepats it maybe a n00b question, but could web-components take care of this re-usability issue?
In theory yes. Web components' api feels very old and weird though, and it's hard to have web components talk to the rest the app because of their isolated design
@@pookiepats my point still stands, if your app is not a Shopify clone and only serves a couple thousands of users, then by all means go ahead and use htmx only. There's no either-or situation here. Rigidity is the death of code creativity.
@@wchorskiWeb components are dead on arrival.
amazing animations and editing💥
htmx is NOT a ui library lol. Its just a js library
Most frameworks are just over engineered bloatware. I'm looking at you react! 😂
Have you ever thought about talking about htmx
Thanks for the video
Great video
Nice please do Django
Golang + HTMX 🔥
Really cool
It's winning? First time I heard this.
Good content
Another hyped Js library 😂😂😂
Not really, this "js library" is anti-js
@@majus1334 this is indeed remains a JS lib also anti-js or zero js is not new look at Astro
still htmx has a way long journey to reach to it's competitors.
Just because you say so.
@@RaúlCórdova-l6s Nah it is still lagging behind in managing of states and caches. I'd like it to become more developer friendly though.
🎉🎉🔥🔥
winning? by what metric? github stars?
even Svelete struggles to get traction. learn Angular/React/Vue if you want a job. or if you don't like that path try learning web components.
Relax and dont cry it is just a framework
Winning? Literally no one uses HTMX to right production code. It's buggy not scalable and I would rather use basic JS.
Basic JS already is a bug... HTMX was already used to replace react and such in some projects, google a bit.
spoken like a true noob 😂
agree, almost no one using htmx on production. i can show which companies uses React/Angular/Vue. can anyone show me which companies uses HTMX on production?
@@oboynitro you think companies use HTMX on production?
*write not right
Make a video on Android studio plz
HTMX is Just another Over Hyped Library but not worse than angular/vue/etc
HTMX has lot of potential 😊
You should get the HTMX sucks mug
At least it's not over-bloated like any other js framework
Vue ist the WORST framework IT has developed in over 50 years (*)! Everything is in 1 huge .vue file! Angular is much cleaner. You can refactor out code.
Based on real code I have seen from others.