thanks! i usually like to do everything "live" and "real" as possible! my "SCRIPT" is usually based off of collected detailed images and detailed diagrams.
Anything north or east of the Altais is unproven as to whether or not the Indian subduction built it. Its also disproven for the entire Circum-Pacific Belt
good point! originally i didn't "agree' with the directional shift of "india' to the north east? what really raises the questions is along EAST AFRICA and the great lakes of Africa "splitting off from africa'... what we do see is about a 1000 to 2000 mile shift between where the earthquakes are "today' and the major geolical formations around oceana. some good examples of this? are around FIJI and the "New Zealand' boot? so we can measure the distance between the HIMALAYAS and the current earthquakes and we see there is still some "line' where both the edge of the Himalayas as well as the current earthquakes particularly those near north west india? so you can measure the disntace between TIBET and "geological center' of HIMALAYAS and the northern boundary region in india between Himalayas? my personal estimate is that the relationship between the "axial tilt' and the earthquake distance from major islands in the OCEANIA can tell us something about how much the earth shifts?
sorry about that! its a bit of a complicated topic... and difficult to discuss all the details... later in the video i drop a lot of the UMs sorry! :(.
good content keep it up bro, maybe with a script next time
thanks! i usually like to do everything "live" and "real" as possible! my "SCRIPT" is usually based off of collected detailed images and detailed diagrams.
Anything north or east of the Altais is unproven as to whether or not the Indian subduction built it. Its also disproven for the entire Circum-Pacific Belt
good point! originally i didn't "agree' with the directional shift of "india' to the north east? what really raises the questions is along EAST AFRICA and the great lakes of Africa "splitting off from africa'... what we do see is about a 1000 to 2000 mile shift between where the earthquakes are "today' and the major geolical formations around oceana. some good examples of this? are around FIJI and the "New Zealand' boot? so we can measure the distance between the HIMALAYAS and the current earthquakes and we see there is still some "line' where both the edge of the Himalayas as well as the current earthquakes particularly those near north west india? so you can measure the disntace between TIBET and "geological center' of HIMALAYAS and the northern boundary region in india between Himalayas? my personal estimate is that the relationship between the "axial tilt' and the earthquake distance from major islands in the OCEANIA can tell us something about how much the earth shifts?
Uuh. Uhm. Uuh. Uhm.
It's unbearable...
Was a little annoying. I didn't mind all of them but when they tripled up it got a little frustrating.
Should improve with practise.
sorry about that! its a bit of a complicated topic... and difficult to discuss all the details... later in the video i drop a lot of the UMs sorry! :(.
@@honeyresearch thanks. Very interesting topic