This issue of Rizal’s retraction reminds me of the importance of media and information literacy, especially in this day and age of social media and misinformation. We must be reminded that we cannot take everything at face value. We must verify if the information is real or not. Moreover, we must also understand its context in its entirety. In the case of Rizal’s retraction, we needed to verify the reason behind it; if this was done forcefully by the friars, if this was done so that Rizal could be married, or if there were other reasons behind it. Whether or not this retraction letter was written by Rizal, this must not be used against him and used to discount the value of his contributions to the country. As mentioned in the video, what he did in the past has been done and it cannot be changed. He has achieved his original goals and inspired many to act against injustice. More importantly, he has served the nation far greater than most to the point that he sacrificed his life for us Filipinos.
I feel very fortunate to be one of the students learning about this topic in class (GERIZAL) with Sir Xiao. Sir Xiao explained, as he also does in this video lecture, that the signature attributed to Rizal might have been fabricated by church officials. However, his point was that whether the signature was real or not ultimately doesn’t matter. What truly matters is the revolutionary impact of Rizal’s works, which have left a mark on our history.
This talk shows how complicated Rizal’s life and decisions were, especially with the retraction issue. Even if he did sign it, it doesn’t take away everything he did for the Philippines. He sacrificed so much for our freedom, and that’s what really makes him a hero. Sir Xiao’s explanation made me realize that history isn’t always clear-cut, it’s full of debates, but Rizal’s legacy will always inspire us.
Ang isyu ng retraktasyon ay nagpapakita kung gaano kalaking simbolo si Rizal sa bansa, na kahit ang kanyang retraktasyon ay may malaking timbang o halaga sa mga nagiging opinyon ng lipunan tungkol sa maraming bagay. Ngunit totoo man o hindi, hindi nito kailan man mababago ang mga nagawa ni Rizal para sa bansa! Maraming salamat, Sir Xiao, sa napaka informative na lecture!
What really stood out to me in Sir Xiao’s talk was how many nationalists are so hesitant to accept that Rizal might have retracted his beliefs. If that’s true, it challenges the very reason we’ve always seen him as a national hero-the fight for freedom and revolution. It’s a tough thing to accept because it would mean we have to rethink the whole idea of Rizal’s martyrdom and what it truly stood for. Sir Xiao’s talk really made me realize that history isn’t as simple as we’d like it to be. Heroes, even ones as revered as Rizal, are complex, and sometimes the truth is messier than we imagine.
This video tackles the controversial issue of Rizal’s retraction with depth and balance. Whether he retracted or not, it doesn’t erase his contributions to Filipino nationalism and his impact on our history. Thank you, Sir Xiao, for shedding light on this complex topic and reminding us of Rizal’s enduring legacy as a true hero.
I appreciate how Sir Xiao went beyond the controversy and debate and asked the question, "What does this mean for us today?” The bottom line is that whether or not Rizal signed the document, the impact he had on the revolution, whose benefits we reap today, cannot be erased and Rizal’s writing still speaks truth to the realities we live today. I definitely agree with Sir’s statement saying, “What Rizal did for that night will not erase Rizal's greatness.”
The comments on Sir Xiao Chua's lecture reflect how Rizal's retraction continues to spark debate, showing that history is not always black and white. Whether or not the retraction is true, it does not lessen the immense sacrifices Rizal made for the Philippines and the legacy he left behind. This discussion reminds me of the importance of critically examining historical events while appreciating the lasting impact of our heroes on our nation's identity.
Honestly, knowing the issue behind the retraction of Rizal’s work really opened my eyes to the issues of history. Regardless of whether he signed that retraction or not I still think that it should not take away from everything that was done for out country. Thus, for me his sacrifices and his dedication to the Philippines independence are true face of a hero. As this discussion made me realised, history is always aligned with debates and ambiguity but Rizal is still encouraging us to build for a better Philippines.
The lecture offers a balanced exploration of the controversial issue of Jose Rizal’s retraction. Regardless of whether he retracted, his contributions to Filipino nationalism and his enduring legacy as a hero remain undeniable. This discussion encourages deeper reflection on what truly defines a hero.
Sir Xiao's talk really opened my eyes to how complicated the conversations around Rizal’s relationship with religion was, especially regarding the topic of his retraction. I didn’t know how much it actually influenced the way we view his character and legacy as a national hero. It’s intriguing how this topic still sparks debate and opens up discussions on the evolving nature of his beliefs throughout his life.
Another great episode of Xiao Talks! This made me realize that there so many different views towards Rizal and this takes me back to a class discussion we had with Sir Xiao wether Rizal deserves to be called a national hero despite having different views on him. However, we must not ignore the fact that he sacrificied a lot for our country, and that for me is a true hero.
Ang video tungkol sa retraction ni Rizal ay nagbigay-linaw sa kanyang buhay at legasiya. Kahit may mga debate tungkol dito, hindi mababago ang mga kontribusyon ni Rizal sa ating bansa. Ang tunay na halaga ni Rizal ay nasa kanyang mga prinsipyo at sa patuloy niyang inspirasyon sa mga Pilipino.
Thanks for these videos, Sir! The discussion about Rizal’s retraction really opened my eyes to how complex his life and decisions were. Whether or not the retraction happened, it doesn’t erase all the sacrifices he made and his impact on our nation. These kinds of topics remind us that history isn’t always black and white, and that’s what makes it so interesting to learn about!
I find this topic incredibly interesting. Even in today’s era, where information can be easily spread and verified, it’s still often controlled by a powerful few. This was even more true in the past, especially when the Catholic Church held significant influence. While there’s a possibility that Rizal did sign the retraction, it doesn’t diminish the fact that his contributions were so monumental that this act wouldn’t tarnish his legacy. Rizal remains one of the key figures who paved the way for our country’s freedom.
Thank you for this insightful episode, Sir Xiao! Indeed, one of the most debated controversies about Rizal is his alleged retraction. To this day, scholars and historians continue to argue whether he truly retracted or not. If he did, it would imply that he also married Josephine Bracken. While evidence of a retraction document exists, some claim that the Church may have forged his signature. Additionally, there is no concrete proof of a marriage or contract, which caused disputes between Rizal's family and Josephine. However, in the grand scheme of things, whether Rizal retracted or not no longer diminishes his legacy. His writings and ideas have left a mark on Filipino identity and continue to inspire countless lives to this day. What truly matters is the enduring impact of his works and his unyielding dedication to the Filipino people.
The Retraction of Jose Rizal showed how complicated his life and decisions were. Whether or not Rizal retracted his beliefs, his significant contributions to the country and his sacrifices for freedom remain undeniable. This issue made me realize how essential it is to approach history with context and critical thinking, especially in an age of misinformation.
What I found fascinating was the idea that Rizal’s retraction, true or not, doesn’t diminish the power of his ideas. The influence of his works shows that actions might fade, but words that are rooted in truth can inspire across generations no matter how much time passes.
This video is really important because people usually only talk about Rizal’s works, like Noli Me Tangere, but this actually covers a controversial issue. The retraction of Rizal is especially interesting to me because it’s about a moment when he was already close to death. No matter what truly happened with the retraction, I think we can all agree that it doesn’t change the fact that Rizal was a hero. He deeply cared for the Philippines, served the community, and helped open the eyes of Filipinos to see that we are more than what the Spaniards claimed us to be and that we deserve to be treated equally. Rizal ignited a sense of nationalism in us and helped correct how Filipinos view our history. We should never forget all he contributed to our country.
When I first learned about Rizal’s retraction I was really confused. However, this lecture video made me realize how history should not make us believe everything we see… it should make us critical thinkers, challenge us to be more curious and learn more than what meets the eye.
Thank you Sir Xiao Chua for this video. Unlike the rest of your videos, the Retraction issue was something that was initially unfamiliar to me. However, your insightful discussion bridged my understanding of the topic and allowed me to see some rich contrasting beliefs about our Philippine History. Really eye-opening!
Whether or not the signature of Rizal in that retraction letter is authentic, I believe that the video really encourages us to better understand the nuances of his contribution to history. This video is a reminder that history is not only complicated in of itself but can be open for interpretation.
Jose Rizal's retraction is without doubt a controversy that has sparked debate for years; whether or not his signature is real reclaiming his beliefs in the Catholic church. Considering that this document existed during the time of the Spanish occupation, it is understandable why it did spark debate considering the power of the Church way back then. Nevertheless, whether Jose Rizal retracted or not, such document should never erase his contributions for the revolution and for the country's liberation overall. This is a comprehensive lecture about the manner.
Ang retraksyon ni Rizal ay isa sa mga mahahalagang aspeto ng kanyang buhay na patuloy na kiligin ng imahinasyon ng marami. Tunay nga na ito ay isang kontrobersyal na usapin, sapagkat mahirap paniwalaan na biglang bawiin ni Rizal ang lahat ng kanyang mga kritisismo sa simbahan, lalo na't kilala siya bilang isang taong may matibay na paninindigan sa laban para sa mga Pilipino.
From this webinar, Sir Xiao presented many arguments and sources for the retraction letter. He highlighted the role of interests and biases in determining whether one will believe in the retraction letter or not. The image of Rizal is definitely based on the interests of the society and may differ based on what you want to believe in. There are many criticisms and controversies toward the retraction letter, but what happened that day will not change Rizal's impact on the country and the Philippines, which I find most important.
This discussion was really informative and I was able to learn a lot about the retraction issue. I havent previously heard of this before so its really interesting to hear about Rizal's potential retraction. Whether or not Rizal actually signed the form actions always speak for themselves and what he did for the sake of the Philippines showcases what he believed in.
Mula sa lekturang ito, isa sa mga napakahalagang aral na napulot ko ay ang pagtanong ng “Eh ano ngayon?” mula sa mga bagay-bagay na aking nababasa o naririnig. Napakahalaga na imbes na aking tanggapin at isaloob na lamang ang bawat salaysay, dapat ding aking tanungin kung ito ba’y may saysay para sa kung sino man. Alinsunod dito, totoo man ang retraction ni Rizal, tunay ngang hindi pa rin nito mabubura lahat ng ginawa ni Rizal para sa ating bansa. Maaaring ang naging saysay ng retraction ni Rizal ay ang pagkasal niya kay Josephine Bracken; gayunpaman, hindi nito mapapawi ang impluwensya ni Rizal na hanggang ngayo’y nananatili sa sanlibutan.
The question of whether José Rizal retracted his anti-colonial stance before his execution is one of the most controversial topics in Philippine history. The discussion on this retraction brings to light the complexity of Rizal's character and his final moments. On one hand, some believe the retraction was fabricated by Spanish authorities to undermine his legacy; on the other, some argue that Rizal, facing death, might have softened his position. What this debate highlights for me is how Rizal, like any human being, faced immense pressure and emotional turmoil. Whether or not he retracted, it doesn’t diminish his contributions to the revolution. If anything, the fact that this question still sparks discussions today speaks volumes about how impactful and influential Rizal's principles were. It forces us to re-examine what truly defines a hero: is it their every action, or the lasting impact they leave behind?
Great Content Sir Xiao! This really made me rethink what I’ve always heard about Rizal’s retraction. It was eye-opening to see how different pieces of evidence are presented, and it left me questioning some of the beliefs I had. The video made me realize how history is full of gaps and how important it is to verify the source of our information.
The discussion on Rizal's retraction explores the complex question of whether he renounced his beliefs before his death, examining evidence and historical context. This analysis sheds light on Rizal's final moments, revealing the depth of his convictions and the lasting debate around his legacy.
Para sa akin, ang retraksyon ni Rizal ay isa sa mga nakakapukaw-interes na aspeto sa buhay niya. Napakakontrobersyal ng paksang ito, dahil ang hirap paniwalaan na binawi na lang ni Rizal ang lahat ng kanyang pambabatikos sa simbahan, mas lalo na't alam natin na siya ay walang takot na pinaglaban ang kapakanan ng mga Pilipino. Legitimate man o hindi, walang duda na malaki pa rin ang naging papel ni Rizal sa kalayaan at kamalayan ng mga Pilipino. Ang kanyang legacy ay hindi dapat nating maliitin.
First and foremost, I genuinely appreciate Prof. Xiao's use of TH-cam as a platform for disseminating information about Philippine history and culture. The fact that there are so many competing views regarding Jose Rizal's life and that people continue to question whether he deserves to be honored as the nation's national hero intrigues me. Despite the fact that he may have signed the agreement, none of his inspirational deeds for Filipinos can be undone. But his contributions, which continue to motivate Filipinos, will not go ignored.
The use of TH-cam to share insights on Philippine history and culture is not unheard of, but is not as widespread as it can be, particularly amidst the ongoing debate surrounding Jose Rizal's legacy as the national hero. Despite controversies surrounding Rizal's life, his enduring contributions to Filipino society remain invaluable and serve as a source of inspiration for generations to come.
I enjoyed this talk a lot because it gave me a glimpse of the theories or ideas behind the work historians do or what the essence of history truly is. More specifically, I learned how nuance, meanings/symbols, and context matters (especially the biases, interests, or affiliation of a source) as well as the significance of comparison and scientific inquiry (especially with the authenticity and truth of a narrative) in historical activities. Seeing these particularly in (1) how the discussion of Rizal’s retraction involved things like Spain-freemason relations, Josephine Bracken and Rizal family relations, and the opposition to the Rizal law and Rizal’s heroism, as well as (2) Prof. Escalante’s thorough work on Balaguer and Moreno’s accounts on the retraction solidified my perception of Rizal and really, the field of history as deserving of much respect and reverence, and not merely reduced to “chismis.”
A valuable point made in the video is the idea that Rizal's retraction, real or not, should not diminish his legacy as our national hero. The ideals which Rizal championed through his writings undoubtably shaped the country in its identity and ideals, serving as invaluable catalysts for Philippine independence; however, these writings did not succeed in doing so due solely to Rizal's sentiments but also due to the efforts and desires of the Filipinos of the time and even up until now. Thus, regardless of the truth of Rizal's retraction it can be said he simply provided a written form which united Filipinos under a shared strife, a shared desire, a shared hope for freedom which his writings had championed, a message which the Filipino people took to heart and took as their own regardless of what Rizal thought at the very end. The legacy Rizal left the Philippines was that of a unifying narrative which brought together Filipinos to revolution, a narrative of independence and freedom; should his retraction prove true, then it simply means that he was imperfect in his convictions, something we should not be vehemently repulsed by considering Rizal was simply a person, another Filipino, and in that way it kind of still elevates his legacy, that even an imperfect man like Rizal could love his country so dearly and leave a lasting impact for the good of the future generations, so too we, imperfect men and women can love our country dearly and leave a lasting impact for the good of the future generations.
This video offers an in-depth look at the intriguing aspects of Rizal's retraction, emphasizing the complexities involved. Regardless of whether he signed the document, Rizal's contributions and works that inspire Filipinos continue to be enduring and significant.
Whether he signed the retraction or not, it will not change the fact that Jose Protacio Mercado Rizal y Alonzo Realonda's works opened the minds of the Filipinos, boosted Nationalism and love of country! Thank you for the enlightenment, Prof. Chua.
The controversy surrounding Rizal's retraction and role as a national hero stems from debates about his reformist stance and lack of direct involvement in the revolution. The authenticity of his alleged retraction is also questioned, as it could undermine his earlier beliefs and criticisms of Spanish rule. Nonetheless, Rizal's contributions, particularly his novels that exposed colonial injustices and inspired nationalism, cannot be denied. While he wasn’t a revolutionary leader, his advocacy for reform and ultimate sacrifice made him a symbol of the Filipino struggle for freedom.
"The solid conviction po of our national hero Dr. Jose Rizal, was so immovable in life, that they can ONLY cowardly & deceptively reverse it...in death."
I find it intriguing that there are still many theories surrounding Jose Rizal’s history, and debates continue on whether he should truly be considered the country’s national hero. The topic of Rizal’s retraction is still a point of discussion, but for me, it doesn’t matter whether the retraction was real or not. What makes him a hero are the contributions he already made. His ability to inspire Filipinos is something that can never be undone.
I appreciate this video by Xiao Talks: The Retraction of Jose Rizal, presented by Professor Xiao Chua, internal and external analysis, and primary and secondary sources. This base explanation was necessary before reading further about Jose Rizal. The statement more struck Prof. Xiao said more about "ang masa ang tunay na Bayani" (the masses are the true heroes) and also mentioned a lot of "Iisang nakaraan, maraming kasaysayan," which related to a lot of historians in terms of discussing the stories and legacy of Rizal. This letter led historians into great debate since it contains contradicting ideals of what a progressive Rizal must have had. Yet this letter inspires debates on Rizal's legacy and complicated position relative to faith and national identity. I was surprised that Rizal wrote a letter of retraction, and the whole context surrounding that letter, especially that he wrote that so he could marry Josephine Bracken in a Catholic ceremony, was enlightening and intriguing at the same time. Regardless of whether the letter of retraction is authentic, I agree with others who argue that it does not diminish Rizal's tremendous impact in the Philippines.
Thank you Sir Xiao for this lecture, dahil dito ay mas lulalim pa ang interes ko sa diskurso tungkol sa retraction ni Rizal. Bilang isang mag-aaral, ang pagiging radikal at kritikal sa mga bagay ay mahalaga. Ito ang isang kaugalian na hindi masusukat ng kahit anong rubric at pagmamarka. Hindi maikakaila na malaki at napakahalaga ng naging kontribusyon ni Dr. Jose Rizal sa ating bansa. Ngunit dahil dito, napaisip ako sa kung anong prinsipyo ang mayroon si Rizal, lalo na sa naging sitwasyon niya.
Ang pag-uusap tungkol sa retraksyon ni Rizal ay patuloy na nagbibigay ng interes at naglalagay ng ilang tanong sa ating mga isipan. Ang kontrobersiya na kaakibat nito ay nagpapakita ng kahalagahan ng pagiging kritikal at mapanuri sa ating pag-aaral ng kasaysayan at mga kilalang personalidad. Sa pag-aaral ng buhay ni Rizal, isa itong mahalagang bahagi na nagbibigay ng mga diskurso at pagninilay-nilay sa kanyang mga prinsipyo at paninindigan. Ang kanyang kontribusyon sa bansa ay hindi maaaring mabalewala, ngunit ang mga usapin tulad ng retraksyon ay nagpapahiwatig ng komplikasyon at ang mga aspetong hindi agad naipapaliwanag.
Ang retraksyon ni Rizal ay isang kontrobersyal na bahagi ng kanyang buhay kung saan inaamin niya ang kanyang mga pagkakasala laban sa Simbahan at nagpahayag ng pagmamalasakit sa mga Pilipinong Katoliko. Ito ay nagdulot ng malaking epekto sa kanyang pananaw at sa kanyang relasyon sa mga taong nakapaligid sa kanya. Ang retraksyon ay patuloy na pinag-aaralan at pinagtatalunan hanggang sa kasalukuyan, nagbibigay ng iba't ibang interpretasyon at opinyon mula sa mga dalubhasa at tagasunod ni Rizal. Marami paring mga perspektibo at opinyon ukol sa katotohanan ng Retraksyon mapahanggang sa ngayon. Ngunit, totoo man o hindi, para sa akin, hindi na importante ito sapagkat ang kaniyang kabayanihan ay hindi na dapat kinekwestyon sapagkat napakalaki ng naging epekto ni Rizal para sa paggamit ng kalayaan ng Pilipinas.
good afternoon prof.Xiao chua I am Rey John Panglilingan a history teacher thanks for the lecture regarding the rizal's retraction and now its very clear to my mind that our national hero done the retraction in exchange of favor to married Josephine bracken. it is very difficult to teach the history where together with my students confusing the context of the history and one of that is the retraction of rizal.
Many say that Rizal really has signed the retraction, but many also believed that he didn’t due to lack of evidence. Whether or not he signed the retraction, I believe that his works did have a big contribution or impact to everyone as his works still continue to inspire today’s youth.
I BELIEVE THAT RIZAL KNEW THAT WHATEVER RETRACTION HE DID THAT DAY WILL NOT MATTER . BUT IT IS NOT ENOUGH TO EXCHANGE HIS LIFE JUST FOR A WEDDING AND DEATH AS A CATHOLIC, I BELIEVE THERE IS A MORE WORTHWHILE DEAL. WHICH IS A FAKE EXECUTION,
Hanggang ngayon, marami ang nagdedebate tungkol sa retraksyon ni Rizal. Maraming espekulasyon kung ano nga ba ang nangyari ngunit hindi ito masisiguro dahil sa kakulangan ng mga datos. Kaya naman, sa likod ng mga kontrobersya ng retraksyon, mahalaga pa ring isaisip na sa tulong ng mga sulat at prinsipyo ni Rizal, namulat ang mga Pilipino na siyang nagpaalab sa kanilang diwang makabayan.
The authencity of Rizal's retraction will always be a controversial issue in Rizal's life. Throughout the years, multiple debates and discussions have been sparked by this controversy, but regardless if his retraction was genuine or not, Rizal's legacy in Philippine History will remain unforgotten for generations to come.
Wide and comprehensive presentation with critical analysis of the text are very important to arrive the larger truth. History shapes our society. It can't be ignored.
The retraction of Dr. Jose Rizal reconverting to Catholicism before his execution is controversial, and a never-ending debate on its authenticity. Whether or not it indeed happened, it won't change the fact that Rizal made an impact and inspired his fellowmen through his life and works. It will not erase his legacy.
Kasiya-siyang tuklasin ang mga perspektibo at teorya tungkol sa retraksiyon ni Rizal na naging medyo kontrobersyal na paksa. Nagustuhan ko ang pinakapangunahing punto ng panayam ni Sir Chua na iisa lamang ang katotohanan, pero marami ang kasaysayan depende sa paningin at gustong paniwalaan ng tao. Para sa iba kasi ay may epekto ito sa mga motibasyon ni Rizal para sa mga nagawa niya, lalo na kasi pwedeng may pagtatanggi ito sa kanyang pagiging "tunay" na bayani. Ngunit ang katotohanan ay hindi pa rin natin pwedeng ipagwalang-bahala ang kanyang mga tulong at sakripisyo para sa Inang Bayan kahit naging Katoliko man siya o hindi sa huli.
While I don't have a definitive belief on Jose Rizal's retraction (I'm leaning towards disbelief) both because I only learned of this recency, and that both sides look like they have an agenda to pursue their biases and sides. However, I believe that whether his retraction is real or not, it should not diminish Rizal's contributions to the country and his great actions.
at 49:45 is very relatable for us students sir. As a student we need to verify and cite if the source we red was credible enough for it to be labeled as "true" or fact. Just like in correlation to the controversy of retraction of Rizal.
It's very interesting how Rizal's Retraction continues to spark intense debates and research regarding its authenticity. This controversy has even prompted disputes over whether the Retraction was voluntary or coercive in nature. Nevertheless, despite arguments over this issue, it doesn't change the fact that Rizal inspired and contributed to the independence of the Philippines from Spain's colonization. His ideas, works, and projects provide enduring insights that are still relevant in the present society.
Ang kontrobersyal na retraksyon ni Rizal ay nagtuturo sa atin na ang isang tao ay maaaring magkaroon ng kahinaan, ngunit ang kanyang mga prinsipyo ay nag-iwan ng hindi matatawarang epekto sa kalayaan ng bayan. Ang aral dito ay ang mga gawa ng isang bayani ay hindi nabubura ng alinmang kontrobersiya.
Napakaganda ng punto ni sir Chua na ang retraksyon ni Rizal ay hindi nakakaapeekto sa kadakilaan ni Rizal. Ang kanyang pagsulat at posibleng pagpirma nito ay hindi patungkol sa kanyang pagiging bayani kundi sa posibleng pagpaslang sa kanya ng simbahang Katoliko sa mga panahong iyon.
As one of the most renowned national heroes of the Philippines. We might only know of the romanticizations of them. This gave me a fresh perspective of Jose Rizal, as it shows his struggles for criticizing friars in the books he authored. However, this retraction of Jose Rizal may have different opinions and perspectives and may seem controversial doe to its authenticity.
It is interesting to learn about all the meticulous details surrounding Rizal’s retraction. The case was thoroughly investigated by experts and reported well by this video. Although he may have signed that document, all his works that continuously inspire Filipinos can not be reversed. Indeed, this will not undo everything Rizal has done for this nation.
This Retraction Theory made me have seconds thoughts on what principles do Rizal uphold. However, I still believe that, he made a huge contribution to the Philippine Revolution.
I didn't know before that Jose Rizal wrote a letter of retraction and have learned a lot from this video. It is amusing to learn the details surrounding this retraction letter such as it being written in the first place was so that Jose Rizal can marry Josephine Bracken in a Catholic setting. Anyways, I have to agree with the others that said regardless whether the retraction letter is real or not; it does not change the fact that Jose Rizal has done so much for the Philippines.
Ang Retraksyon ni Rizal ang isa sa pinaka mahalagang parte ng buhay nya na kaakibat ng kanyang pagpapaksal sa kanyang huling pag-ibig na si Josephine Bracken. Maraming debate tungkol dito at maraming ayaw maniwala ngunit tunay man o hindi, walang duda na malaki pa rin ang naging ambag ni Rizal sa kalayaan at kamalayan ng mga Pilipino.
I find it interesting that there are a lot of theories about the history of Jose Rizal and there are stills doubts whether he should be the country’s national hero. Hanggang ngayon ay usap-usapan pa rin ang retraction ni Rizal, ngunit naniniwala akong hindi na mahalaga kung tunay ba ang retraction ni Rizal dahil kaya naman siya naging bayani dahil sa kanyang mga nagawa na. Hindi niya na mababawi ang kanyang pagbibigay inspirasyon sa mga Pilipino.
Ipinakita at ipinaliwanag sa diskusyong ito ang iba’t ibang mga panig, impormasyon, at detalye ukol sa kontrobersyal na retraskyon ni Rizal. Bagamat maraming mga haka-haka at opinyon ang nakapalibot rito, naniniwala ako na kahit nilagdaan man ni Rizal ang dokyumentong iyon ay hindi na nito mababago ang kanyang mga naunang naisulat at naisawalat ukol sa maalipustang pamamalakad ng mga Espanyol at mga prayle sa Pilipinas.
It is amazing to hear about all the painstaking details surrounding Rizal’s retraction. The matter was extensively researched by specialists and reported nicely by this video. Although he signed the contract, all of his efforts that continue to inspire Filipinos cannot be undone. Indeed, nothing Rizal has done for the country will be undone.
Ginagamit ko din po ang mga video materials po ninyo Sir Xiao sa pagtuturo sa kolehiyo. Malaking tulong po sa pagmulat ng kamalayan ng mga studyante ngayon tungkol sa kasaysayan.
It is fascinating to learn about all the meticulous details behind Rizal's retraction. Experts extensively studied the situation, which was covered correctly in this video. Although he did sign the contract, all his works and all he has done for the country that continues inspiring Filipinos cannot be undone.
Thank you, Sir Chua, for using your platform to make some point about Rizal's retraction. I believe this video helped me better understand Rizal's goals and how he truly deserved his status as our national hero.
Ang pagbawi ni Rizal ay nananatiling isang kontrobersyal na isyu sa kanyang buhay, na pumukaw ng mga debate sa paglipas ng mga taon. Gayunpaman, totoo man o hindi, ang kanyang pamana sa kasaysayan ng Pilipinas ay hindi malilimutan sa mga henerasyon.
Thank you, sir Chua! Indeed, there are many speculations about the retraction of Rizal against his religion of Catholicism. There were beliefs that Rizal did not sign the letter he wrote saying that he will be (like) a newly born Catholic. However, some also say that Rizal signs the letter because the dates did not match the writing. Despite this, I believe that Rizal is firm in his decisions and beliefs and he would not sign the letter himself. However, viewing the letter for his technical marriage proposal for his beloved lover, I think they could've sworn their love of each other despite the formal marriage contract they wouldn't be able to avail.
The retraction of Rizal misaligned how we understood Rizal, fighting for the freedom of Filipino through his works and writings. This video specifies the details of the retraction of Rizal and brings out possible theories that may support each claim about the retraction letter. Somehow, this interests me in the way that theories were produced because of a certain action that Rizal has taken before his death.
Thank you sir for this very informative video! I was able to learn more about the details of the Retraction of Dr. Jose Rizal and helped me able to understand every single detail of his retraction, which is essential in learning our history, specifically our national heroes.
Hindi man natin siguro malalaman na kung ang Retraction ni Rizal ay totoo o inde, dapat parin antin bigyang respeto ang mga naidulot ni Rizal sa ating bansa. Nakakatuwa na kahit matagal na hindi nasasagot ang issue na ito, ay madami pa rin ang nagsasaliksik at naghahanap ng katotohanan patungkol dito. Dahil sa video na ito ay mas marami pa akong nalaman tungkol sa Retraction ni Rizal.
Isa sa mga kontrobersyal na isyu o kaganapan, na hanggang ngayon ay walang kasiguraduhan, ay ang retraksyon ni Rizal, kung saan siya ay umamin ng pagkakamali at nagbigay ng pagsisisi sa kanyang mga naunang paninindigan laban sa simbahan. Bagama’t ay maraming taon na ang nakalilipas, kung totoo man na isinulat ni Rizal ang retraksyon, maaari kayang magkaroon ito ng epekto sa kanyang reputasyon bilang bayani ng bansa?
It could have been true that Rizal wrote the retraction letter but the situation has turned Rizal’s mental state into mush, everyone can break for a moment. Even Jesus asked God why has God forsaken him. Maaaring ginawa nga iyon ni Rizal pero hindi ito totoo sa kanyang puso, kung ikukumpara mo ito sa kanyang mga sulatin mula sa kanyang mga Nobela o iyong mga gawa nila sa La Solidaridad bilang ilustrado. Kataka-takang luluhod si Rizal kay padre damaso.
Totoo nga ba o hindi ang lagda at laman ng retraction letter ni Rizal? Ngayon ay wala pa ring nakakaalam. Pero ano nga bang mangyayari sa imahe ni Rizal kung mapapatunayan na ito'y totoo? Babawiin ba ang kanyang pamagat na bayani? O patuloy pa rin siyang magiging national hero?
Masasabi kong nagkaroon ako ng bagong perspective kay Rizal dahil sa alleged retraction niya at ang kaugnayan nito sa Catholic Church, at ang pananaw niya sa mga prayle noong panahon niya. Ngunit, sumsang-ayon ako na hindi nababaliwala ang mga sakripisyo niya para sa bayan, kung totoo man ang retraction o hindi.
This issue of Rizal’s retraction reminds me of the importance of media and information literacy, especially in this day and age of social media and misinformation. We must be reminded that we cannot take everything at face value. We must verify if the information is real or not. Moreover, we must also understand its context in its entirety. In the case of Rizal’s retraction, we needed to verify the reason behind it; if this was done forcefully by the friars, if this was done so that Rizal could be married, or if there were other reasons behind it.
Whether or not this retraction letter was written by Rizal, this must not be used against him and used to discount the value of his contributions to the country. As mentioned in the video, what he did in the past has been done and it cannot be changed. He has achieved his original goals and inspired many to act against injustice. More importantly, he has served the nation far greater than most to the point that he sacrificed his life for us Filipinos.
26:49 retraction
I feel very fortunate to be one of the students learning about this topic in class (GERIZAL) with Sir Xiao. Sir Xiao explained, as he also does in this video lecture, that the signature attributed to Rizal might have been fabricated by church officials. However, his point was that whether the signature was real or not ultimately doesn’t matter. What truly matters is the revolutionary impact of Rizal’s works, which have left a mark on our history.
This talk shows how complicated Rizal’s life and decisions were, especially with the retraction issue. Even if he did sign it, it doesn’t take away everything he did for the Philippines. He sacrificed so much for our freedom, and that’s what really makes him a hero. Sir Xiao’s explanation made me realize that history isn’t always clear-cut, it’s full of debates, but Rizal’s legacy will always inspire us.
Ang isyu ng retraktasyon ay nagpapakita kung gaano kalaking simbolo si Rizal sa bansa, na kahit ang kanyang retraktasyon ay may malaking timbang o halaga sa mga nagiging opinyon ng lipunan tungkol sa maraming bagay. Ngunit totoo man o hindi, hindi nito kailan man mababago ang mga nagawa ni Rizal para sa bansa! Maraming salamat, Sir Xiao, sa napaka informative na lecture!
What really stood out to me in Sir Xiao’s talk was how many nationalists are so hesitant to accept that Rizal might have retracted his beliefs. If that’s true, it challenges the very reason we’ve always seen him as a national hero-the fight for freedom and revolution. It’s a tough thing to accept because it would mean we have to rethink the whole idea of Rizal’s martyrdom and what it truly stood for. Sir Xiao’s talk really made me realize that history isn’t as simple as we’d like it to be. Heroes, even ones as revered as Rizal, are complex, and sometimes the truth is messier than we imagine.
This video tackles the controversial issue of Rizal’s retraction with depth and balance. Whether he retracted or not, it doesn’t erase his contributions to Filipino nationalism and his impact on our history. Thank you, Sir Xiao, for shedding light on this complex topic and reminding us of Rizal’s enduring legacy as a true hero.
I appreciate how Sir Xiao went beyond the controversy and debate and asked the question, "What does this mean for us today?” The bottom line is that whether or not Rizal signed the document, the impact he had on the revolution, whose benefits we reap today, cannot be erased and Rizal’s writing still speaks truth to the realities we live today. I definitely agree with Sir’s statement saying, “What Rizal did for that night will not erase Rizal's greatness.”
The comments on Sir Xiao Chua's lecture reflect how Rizal's retraction continues to spark debate, showing that history is not always black and white. Whether or not the retraction is true, it does not lessen the immense sacrifices Rizal made for the Philippines and the legacy he left behind. This discussion reminds me of the importance of critically examining historical events while appreciating the lasting impact of our heroes on our nation's identity.
Honestly, knowing the issue behind the retraction of Rizal’s work really opened my eyes to the issues of history. Regardless of whether he signed that retraction or not I still think that it should not take away from everything that was done for out country. Thus, for me his sacrifices and his dedication to the Philippines independence are true face of a hero. As this discussion made me realised, history is always aligned with debates and ambiguity but Rizal is still encouraging us to build for a better Philippines.
The lecture offers a balanced exploration of the controversial issue of Jose Rizal’s retraction. Regardless of whether he retracted, his contributions to Filipino nationalism and his enduring legacy as a hero remain undeniable. This discussion encourages deeper reflection on what truly defines a hero.
Sir Xiao's talk really opened my eyes to how complicated the conversations around Rizal’s relationship with religion was, especially regarding the topic of his retraction. I didn’t know how much it actually influenced the way we view his character and legacy as a national hero. It’s intriguing how this topic still sparks debate and opens up discussions on the evolving nature of his beliefs throughout his life.
Another great episode of Xiao Talks! This made me realize that there so many different views towards Rizal and this takes me back to a class discussion we had with Sir Xiao wether Rizal deserves to be called a national hero despite having different views on him. However, we must not ignore the fact that he sacrificied a lot for our country, and that for me is a true hero.
Ang video tungkol sa retraction ni Rizal ay nagbigay-linaw sa kanyang buhay at legasiya. Kahit may mga debate tungkol dito, hindi mababago ang mga kontribusyon ni Rizal sa ating bansa. Ang tunay na halaga ni Rizal ay nasa kanyang mga prinsipyo at sa patuloy niyang inspirasyon sa mga Pilipino.
Thanks for these videos, Sir! The discussion about Rizal’s retraction really opened my eyes to how complex his life and decisions were. Whether or not the retraction happened, it doesn’t erase all the sacrifices he made and his impact on our nation. These kinds of topics remind us that history isn’t always black and white, and that’s what makes it so interesting to learn about!
I find this topic incredibly interesting. Even in today’s era, where information can be easily spread and verified, it’s still often controlled by a powerful few. This was even more true in the past, especially when the Catholic Church held significant influence. While there’s a possibility that Rizal did sign the retraction, it doesn’t diminish the fact that his contributions were so monumental that this act wouldn’t tarnish his legacy. Rizal remains one of the key figures who paved the way for our country’s freedom.
Thank you for this insightful episode, Sir Xiao! Indeed, one of the most debated controversies about Rizal is his alleged retraction. To this day, scholars and historians continue to argue whether he truly retracted or not. If he did, it would imply that he also married Josephine Bracken. While evidence of a retraction document exists, some claim that the Church may have forged his signature. Additionally, there is no concrete proof of a marriage or contract, which caused disputes between Rizal's family and Josephine. However, in the grand scheme of things, whether Rizal retracted or not no longer diminishes his legacy. His writings and ideas have left a mark on Filipino identity and continue to inspire countless lives to this day. What truly matters is the enduring impact of his works and his unyielding dedication to the Filipino people.
The Retraction of Jose Rizal showed how complicated his life and decisions were. Whether or not Rizal retracted his beliefs, his significant contributions to the country and his sacrifices for freedom remain undeniable. This issue made me realize how essential it is to approach history with context and critical thinking, especially in an age of misinformation.
What I found fascinating was the idea that Rizal’s retraction, true or not, doesn’t diminish the power of his ideas. The influence of his works shows that actions might fade, but words that are rooted in truth can inspire across generations no matter how much time passes.
This video is really important because people usually only talk about Rizal’s works, like Noli Me Tangere, but this actually covers a controversial issue. The retraction of Rizal is especially interesting to me because it’s about a moment when he was already close to death. No matter what truly happened with the retraction, I think we can all agree that it doesn’t change the fact that Rizal was a hero. He deeply cared for the Philippines, served the community, and helped open the eyes of Filipinos to see that we are more than what the Spaniards claimed us to be and that we deserve to be treated equally. Rizal ignited a sense of nationalism in us and helped correct how Filipinos view our history. We should never forget all he contributed to our country.
When I first learned about Rizal’s retraction I was really confused. However, this lecture video made me realize how history should not make us believe everything we see… it should make us critical thinkers, challenge us to be more curious and learn more than what meets the eye.
Thank you Sir Xiao Chua for this video. Unlike the rest of your videos, the Retraction issue was something that was initially unfamiliar to me. However, your insightful discussion bridged my understanding of the topic and allowed me to see some rich contrasting beliefs about our Philippine History. Really eye-opening!
Whether or not the signature of Rizal in that retraction letter is authentic, I believe that the video really encourages us to better understand the nuances of his contribution to history. This video is a reminder that history is not only complicated in of itself but can be open for interpretation.
Jose Rizal's retraction is without doubt a controversy that has sparked debate for years; whether or not his signature is real reclaiming his beliefs in the Catholic church. Considering that this document existed during the time of the Spanish occupation, it is understandable why it did spark debate considering the power of the Church way back then. Nevertheless, whether Jose Rizal retracted or not, such document should never erase his contributions for the revolution and for the country's liberation overall. This is a comprehensive lecture about the manner.
6:06 KASAYSAYAN ayon kay Zeus salazar
10:39
13:41 Bagong Kasaysayan
16:52 Atoy Navarro
17:54 METODO(magtanong, magimbestiga, magkumpara)
18:07 BATIS(Source)
20:01 Primaryang Batis
21:38 Sekundaryang Batis
23:43 Pano makilatis
26:52 Retraktasyon
Ganda thanks po
Ang retraksyon ni Rizal ay isa sa mga mahahalagang aspeto ng kanyang buhay na patuloy na kiligin ng imahinasyon ng marami. Tunay nga na ito ay isang kontrobersyal na usapin, sapagkat mahirap paniwalaan na biglang bawiin ni Rizal ang lahat ng kanyang mga kritisismo sa simbahan, lalo na't kilala siya bilang isang taong may matibay na paninindigan sa laban para sa mga Pilipino.
From this webinar, Sir Xiao presented many arguments and sources for the retraction letter. He highlighted the role of interests and biases in determining whether one will believe in the retraction letter or not. The image of Rizal is definitely based on the interests of the society and may differ based on what you want to believe in. There are many criticisms and controversies toward the retraction letter, but what happened that day will not change Rizal's impact on the country and the Philippines, which I find most important.
This discussion was really informative and I was able to learn a lot about the retraction issue. I havent previously heard of this before so its really interesting to hear about Rizal's potential retraction. Whether or not Rizal actually signed the form actions always speak for themselves and what he did for the sake of the Philippines showcases what he believed in.
Mula sa lekturang ito, isa sa mga napakahalagang aral na napulot ko ay ang pagtanong ng “Eh ano ngayon?” mula sa mga bagay-bagay na aking nababasa o naririnig. Napakahalaga na imbes na aking tanggapin at isaloob na lamang ang bawat salaysay, dapat ding aking tanungin kung ito ba’y may saysay para sa kung sino man. Alinsunod dito, totoo man ang retraction ni Rizal, tunay ngang hindi pa rin nito mabubura lahat ng ginawa ni Rizal para sa ating bansa. Maaaring ang naging saysay ng retraction ni Rizal ay ang pagkasal niya kay Josephine Bracken; gayunpaman, hindi nito mapapawi ang impluwensya ni Rizal na hanggang ngayo’y nananatili sa sanlibutan.
The question of whether José Rizal retracted his anti-colonial stance before his execution is one of the most controversial topics in Philippine history. The discussion on this retraction brings to light the complexity of Rizal's character and his final moments. On one hand, some believe the retraction was fabricated by Spanish authorities to undermine his legacy; on the other, some argue that Rizal, facing death, might have softened his position. What this debate highlights for me is how Rizal, like any human being, faced immense pressure and emotional turmoil. Whether or not he retracted, it doesn’t diminish his contributions to the revolution. If anything, the fact that this question still sparks discussions today speaks volumes about how impactful and influential Rizal's principles were. It forces us to re-examine what truly defines a hero: is it their every action, or the lasting impact they leave behind?
Great Content Sir Xiao! This really made me rethink what I’ve always heard about Rizal’s retraction. It was eye-opening to see how different pieces of evidence are presented, and it left me questioning some of the beliefs I had. The video made me realize how history is full of gaps and how important it is to verify the source of our information.
The discussion on Rizal's retraction explores the complex question of whether he renounced his beliefs before his death, examining evidence and historical context. This analysis sheds light on Rizal's final moments, revealing the depth of his convictions and the lasting debate around his legacy.
Para sa akin, ang retraksyon ni Rizal ay isa sa mga nakakapukaw-interes na aspeto sa buhay niya. Napakakontrobersyal ng paksang ito, dahil ang hirap paniwalaan na binawi na lang ni Rizal ang lahat ng kanyang pambabatikos sa simbahan, mas lalo na't alam natin na siya ay walang takot na pinaglaban ang kapakanan ng mga Pilipino. Legitimate man o hindi, walang duda na malaki pa rin ang naging papel ni Rizal sa kalayaan at kamalayan ng mga Pilipino. Ang kanyang legacy ay hindi dapat nating maliitin.
First and foremost, I genuinely appreciate Prof. Xiao's use of TH-cam as a platform for disseminating information about Philippine history and culture. The fact that there are so many competing views regarding Jose Rizal's life and that people continue to question whether he deserves to be honored as the nation's national hero intrigues me. Despite the fact that he may have signed the agreement, none of his inspirational deeds for Filipinos can be undone. But his contributions, which continue to motivate Filipinos, will not go ignored.
The use of TH-cam to share insights on Philippine history and culture is not unheard of, but is not as widespread as it can be, particularly amidst the ongoing debate surrounding Jose Rizal's legacy as the national hero. Despite controversies surrounding Rizal's life, his enduring contributions to Filipino society remain invaluable and serve as a source of inspiration for generations to come.
I enjoyed this talk a lot because it gave me a glimpse of the theories or ideas behind the work historians do or what the essence of history truly is. More specifically, I learned how nuance, meanings/symbols, and context matters (especially the biases, interests, or affiliation of a source) as well as the significance of comparison and scientific inquiry (especially with the authenticity and truth of a narrative) in historical activities. Seeing these particularly in (1) how the discussion of Rizal’s retraction involved things like Spain-freemason relations, Josephine Bracken and Rizal family relations, and the opposition to the Rizal law and Rizal’s heroism, as well as (2) Prof. Escalante’s thorough work on Balaguer and Moreno’s accounts on the retraction solidified my perception of Rizal and really, the field of history as deserving of much respect and reverence, and not merely reduced to “chismis.”
A valuable point made in the video is the idea that Rizal's retraction, real or not, should not diminish his legacy as our national hero. The ideals which Rizal championed through his writings undoubtably shaped the country in its identity and ideals, serving as invaluable catalysts for Philippine independence; however, these writings did not succeed in doing so due solely to Rizal's sentiments but also due to the efforts and desires of the Filipinos of the time and even up until now. Thus, regardless of the truth of Rizal's retraction it can be said he simply provided a written form which united Filipinos under a shared strife, a shared desire, a shared hope for freedom which his writings had championed, a message which the Filipino people took to heart and took as their own regardless of what Rizal thought at the very end. The legacy Rizal left the Philippines was that of a unifying narrative which brought together Filipinos to revolution, a narrative of independence and freedom; should his retraction prove true, then it simply means that he was imperfect in his convictions, something we should not be vehemently repulsed by considering Rizal was simply a person, another Filipino, and in that way it kind of still elevates his legacy, that even an imperfect man like Rizal could love his country so dearly and leave a lasting impact for the good of the future generations, so too we, imperfect men and women can love our country dearly and leave a lasting impact for the good of the future generations.
This video offers an in-depth look at the intriguing aspects of Rizal's retraction, emphasizing the complexities involved. Regardless of whether he signed the document, Rizal's contributions and works that inspire Filipinos continue to be enduring and significant.
Whether he signed the retraction or not, it will not change the fact that Jose Protacio Mercado Rizal y Alonzo Realonda's works opened the minds of the Filipinos, boosted Nationalism and love of country!
Thank you for the enlightenment, Prof. Chua.
The controversy surrounding Rizal's retraction and role as a national hero stems from debates about his reformist stance and lack of direct involvement in the revolution. The authenticity of his alleged retraction is also questioned, as it could undermine his earlier beliefs and criticisms of Spanish rule. Nonetheless, Rizal's contributions, particularly his novels that exposed colonial injustices and inspired nationalism, cannot be denied. While he wasn’t a revolutionary leader, his advocacy for reform and ultimate sacrifice made him a symbol of the Filipino struggle for freedom.
Kapag talagang hinimay, mas malinamnam ang impormasyon. Maraming Salamat Prof.Chua!
"The solid conviction po of our national hero Dr. Jose Rizal, was so immovable in life, that they can ONLY cowardly & deceptively reverse it...in death."
Thank you po naunawaan ko po ng malinaw yung pag kakaiba tala ng Cuerpo de Vigilancia sa pahayag ni Padre Balaguer. God bless
I find it intriguing that there are still many theories surrounding Jose Rizal’s history, and debates continue on whether he should truly be considered the country’s national hero. The topic of Rizal’s retraction is still a point of discussion, but for me, it doesn’t matter whether the retraction was real or not. What makes him a hero are the contributions he already made. His ability to inspire Filipinos is something that can never be undone.
I appreciate this video by Xiao Talks: The Retraction of Jose Rizal, presented by Professor Xiao Chua, internal and external analysis, and primary and secondary sources. This base explanation was necessary before reading further about Jose Rizal. The statement more struck Prof. Xiao said more about "ang masa ang tunay na Bayani" (the masses are the true heroes) and also mentioned a lot of "Iisang nakaraan, maraming kasaysayan," which related to a lot of historians in terms of discussing the stories and legacy of Rizal. This letter led historians into great debate since it contains contradicting ideals of what a progressive Rizal must have had. Yet this letter inspires debates on Rizal's legacy and complicated position relative to faith and national identity. I was surprised that Rizal wrote a letter of retraction, and the whole context surrounding that letter, especially that he wrote that so he could marry Josephine Bracken in a Catholic ceremony, was enlightening and intriguing at the same time. Regardless of whether the letter of retraction is authentic, I agree with others who argue that it does not diminish Rizal's tremendous impact in the Philippines.
Thank you Sir Xiao for this lecture, dahil dito ay mas lulalim pa ang interes ko sa diskurso tungkol sa retraction ni Rizal. Bilang isang mag-aaral, ang pagiging radikal at kritikal sa mga bagay ay mahalaga. Ito ang isang kaugalian na hindi masusukat ng kahit anong rubric at pagmamarka. Hindi maikakaila na malaki at napakahalaga ng naging kontribusyon ni Dr. Jose Rizal sa ating bansa. Ngunit dahil dito, napaisip ako sa kung anong prinsipyo ang mayroon si Rizal, lalo na sa naging sitwasyon niya.
Ang pag-uusap tungkol sa retraksyon ni Rizal ay patuloy na nagbibigay ng interes at naglalagay ng ilang tanong sa ating mga isipan. Ang kontrobersiya na kaakibat nito ay nagpapakita ng kahalagahan ng pagiging kritikal at mapanuri sa ating pag-aaral ng kasaysayan at mga kilalang personalidad.
Sa pag-aaral ng buhay ni Rizal, isa itong mahalagang bahagi na nagbibigay ng mga diskurso at pagninilay-nilay sa kanyang mga prinsipyo at paninindigan. Ang kanyang kontribusyon sa bansa ay hindi maaaring mabalewala, ngunit ang mga usapin tulad ng retraksyon ay nagpapahiwatig ng komplikasyon at ang mga aspetong hindi agad naipapaliwanag.
Ang retraksyon ni Rizal ay isang kontrobersyal na bahagi ng kanyang buhay kung saan inaamin niya ang kanyang mga pagkakasala laban sa Simbahan at nagpahayag ng pagmamalasakit sa mga Pilipinong Katoliko. Ito ay nagdulot ng malaking epekto sa kanyang pananaw at sa kanyang relasyon sa mga taong nakapaligid sa kanya. Ang retraksyon ay patuloy na pinag-aaralan at pinagtatalunan hanggang sa kasalukuyan, nagbibigay ng iba't ibang interpretasyon at opinyon mula sa mga dalubhasa at tagasunod ni Rizal. Marami paring mga perspektibo at opinyon ukol sa katotohanan ng Retraksyon mapahanggang sa ngayon. Ngunit, totoo man o hindi, para sa akin, hindi na importante ito sapagkat ang kaniyang kabayanihan ay hindi na dapat kinekwestyon sapagkat napakalaki ng naging epekto ni Rizal para sa paggamit ng kalayaan ng Pilipinas.
good afternoon prof.Xiao chua I am Rey John Panglilingan a history teacher thanks for the lecture regarding the rizal's retraction and now its very clear to my mind that our national hero done the retraction in exchange of favor to married Josephine bracken. it is very difficult to teach the history where together with my students confusing the context of the history and one of that is the retraction of rizal.
Many say that Rizal really has signed the retraction, but many also believed that he didn’t due to lack of evidence. Whether or not he signed the retraction, I believe that his works did have a big contribution or impact to everyone as his works still continue to inspire today’s youth.
"What Rizal did in that night (or day), will not erase Rizal's greatness."
(Xiao Chua about José Rizal's Retraction Webinar)
I BELIEVE THAT RIZAL KNEW THAT WHATEVER RETRACTION HE DID THAT DAY WILL NOT MATTER . BUT IT IS NOT ENOUGH TO EXCHANGE HIS LIFE JUST FOR A WEDDING AND DEATH AS A CATHOLIC, I BELIEVE THERE IS A MORE WORTHWHILE DEAL. WHICH IS A FAKE EXECUTION,
"Di naman ako naboboring no?" OMG sir, napakahindi!! Thank you for your untiring dedication to your work.
Salamat zelle
Hanggang ngayon, marami ang nagdedebate tungkol sa retraksyon ni Rizal. Maraming espekulasyon kung ano nga ba ang nangyari ngunit hindi ito masisiguro dahil sa kakulangan ng mga datos. Kaya naman, sa likod ng mga kontrobersya ng retraksyon, mahalaga pa ring isaisip na sa tulong ng mga sulat at prinsipyo ni Rizal, namulat ang mga Pilipino na siyang nagpaalab sa kanilang diwang makabayan.
Thank you so much Professor Xiao Chua! It's Xiao Time.
The authencity of Rizal's retraction will always be a controversial issue in Rizal's life. Throughout the years, multiple debates and discussions have been sparked by this controversy, but regardless if his retraction was genuine or not, Rizal's legacy in Philippine History will remain unforgotten for generations to come.
Wide and comprehensive presentation with critical analysis of the text are very important to arrive the larger truth. History shapes our society. It can't be ignored.
Úⁿ
The retraction of Dr. Jose Rizal reconverting to Catholicism before his execution is controversial, and a never-ending debate on its authenticity. Whether or not it indeed happened, it won't change the fact that Rizal made an impact and inspired his fellowmen through his life and works. It will not erase his legacy.
Maaaring ang concern ng pari e ang kaluluwa hindi reputasyon
Kasiya-siyang tuklasin ang mga perspektibo at teorya tungkol sa retraksiyon ni Rizal na naging medyo kontrobersyal na paksa. Nagustuhan ko ang pinakapangunahing punto ng panayam ni Sir Chua na iisa lamang ang katotohanan, pero marami ang kasaysayan depende sa paningin at gustong paniwalaan ng tao. Para sa iba kasi ay may epekto ito sa mga motibasyon ni Rizal para sa mga nagawa niya, lalo na kasi pwedeng may pagtatanggi ito sa kanyang pagiging "tunay" na bayani. Ngunit ang katotohanan ay hindi pa rin natin pwedeng ipagwalang-bahala ang kanyang mga tulong at sakripisyo para sa Inang Bayan kahit naging Katoliko man siya o hindi sa huli.
Thank you so much Prof. Chua! It was indeed an informative talk!
While I don't have a definitive belief on Jose Rizal's retraction (I'm leaning towards disbelief) both because I only learned of this recency, and that both sides look like they have an agenda to pursue their biases and sides. However, I believe that whether his retraction is real or not, it should not diminish Rizal's contributions to the country and his great actions.
Grabe, sobrang na-amaze ako sa ating kasaysayan at kung paano mo ito ipinaliwanag! Maraming salamat po!
malaking tulong po ang mga videos nio sa board exam ko maraming salamat po Sir Xiao Chua
Salamat prof,,,hirap intindihin yung nasa module eh ahaha
at 49:45 is very relatable for us students sir. As a student we need to verify and cite if the source we red was credible enough for it to be labeled as "true" or fact. Just like in correlation to the controversy of retraction of Rizal.
It's very interesting how Rizal's Retraction continues to spark intense debates and research regarding its authenticity. This controversy has even prompted disputes over whether the Retraction was voluntary or coercive in nature. Nevertheless, despite arguments over this issue, it doesn't change the fact that Rizal inspired and contributed to the independence of the Philippines from Spain's colonization. His ideas, works, and projects provide enduring insights that are still relevant in the present society.
Ang kontrobersyal na retraksyon ni Rizal ay nagtuturo sa atin na ang isang tao ay maaaring magkaroon ng kahinaan, ngunit ang kanyang mga prinsipyo ay nag-iwan ng hindi matatawarang epekto sa kalayaan ng bayan. Ang aral dito ay ang mga gawa ng isang bayani ay hindi nabubura ng alinmang kontrobersiya.
Thank you for very informative topic. I'm using your videos in my lesson in Araling Panlipunan that really helps me to convey the history effectively.
Napakaganda ng punto ni sir Chua na ang retraksyon ni Rizal ay hindi nakakaapeekto sa kadakilaan ni Rizal. Ang kanyang pagsulat at posibleng pagpirma nito ay hindi patungkol sa kanyang pagiging bayani kundi sa posibleng pagpaslang sa kanya ng simbahang Katoliko sa mga panahong iyon.
As one of the most renowned national heroes of the Philippines. We might only know of the romanticizations of them. This gave me a fresh perspective of Jose Rizal, as it shows his struggles for criticizing friars in the books he authored. However, this retraction of Jose Rizal may have different opinions and perspectives and may seem controversial doe to its authenticity.
It is interesting to learn about all the meticulous details surrounding Rizal’s retraction. The case was thoroughly investigated by experts and reported well by this video. Although he may have signed that document, all his works that continuously inspire Filipinos can not be reversed. Indeed, this will not undo everything Rizal has done for this nation.
This Retraction Theory made me have seconds thoughts on what principles do Rizal uphold. However, I still believe that, he made a huge contribution to the Philippine Revolution.
I didn't know before that Jose Rizal wrote a letter of retraction and have learned a lot from this video. It is amusing to learn the details surrounding this retraction letter such as it being written in the first place was so that Jose Rizal can marry Josephine Bracken in a Catholic setting. Anyways, I have to agree with the others that said regardless whether the retraction letter is real or not; it does not change the fact that Jose Rizal has done so much for the Philippines.
Ang Retraksyon ni Rizal ang isa sa pinaka mahalagang parte ng buhay nya na kaakibat ng kanyang pagpapaksal sa kanyang huling pag-ibig na si Josephine Bracken. Maraming debate tungkol dito at maraming ayaw maniwala ngunit tunay man o hindi, walang duda na malaki pa rin ang naging ambag ni Rizal sa kalayaan at kamalayan ng mga Pilipino.
Maraming salamat po. Magpatuloy pa kayo magbahagi tungkol sa kasaysayan natin
I find it interesting that there are a lot of theories about the history of Jose Rizal and there are stills doubts whether he should be the country’s national hero. Hanggang ngayon ay usap-usapan pa rin ang retraction ni Rizal, ngunit naniniwala akong hindi na mahalaga kung tunay ba ang retraction ni Rizal dahil kaya naman siya naging bayani dahil sa kanyang mga nagawa na. Hindi niya na mababawi ang kanyang pagbibigay inspirasyon sa mga Pilipino.
Ipinakita at ipinaliwanag sa diskusyong ito ang iba’t ibang mga panig, impormasyon, at detalye ukol sa kontrobersyal na retraskyon ni Rizal. Bagamat maraming mga haka-haka at opinyon ang nakapalibot rito, naniniwala ako na kahit nilagdaan man ni Rizal ang dokyumentong iyon ay hindi na nito mababago ang kanyang mga naunang naisulat at naisawalat ukol sa maalipustang pamamalakad ng mga Espanyol at mga prayle sa Pilipinas.
Napakahusay niyo po talaga sir Ciao. Sa bawat discussion niyo po ay marami ako nababaon na bagong mga kaalaman.
It is amazing to hear about all the painstaking details surrounding Rizal’s retraction. The matter was extensively researched by specialists and reported nicely by this video. Although he signed the contract, all of his efforts that continue to inspire Filipinos cannot be undone. Indeed, nothing Rizal has done for the country will be undone.
Ginagamit ko din po ang mga video materials po ninyo Sir Xiao sa pagtuturo sa kolehiyo. Malaking tulong po sa pagmulat ng kamalayan ng mga studyante ngayon tungkol sa kasaysayan.
It is fascinating to learn about all the meticulous details behind Rizal's retraction. Experts extensively studied the situation, which was covered correctly in this video. Although he did sign the contract, all his works and all he has done for the country that continues inspiring Filipinos cannot be undone.
Thank you, Sir Chua, for using your platform to make some point about Rizal's retraction. I believe this video helped me better understand Rizal's goals and how he truly deserved his status as our national hero.
Ang pagbawi ni Rizal ay nananatiling isang kontrobersyal na isyu sa kanyang buhay, na pumukaw ng mga debate sa paglipas ng mga taon. Gayunpaman, totoo man o hindi, ang kanyang pamana sa kasaysayan ng Pilipinas ay hindi malilimutan sa mga henerasyon.
Thank you, sir Chua! Indeed, there are many speculations about the retraction of Rizal against his religion of Catholicism. There were beliefs that Rizal did not sign the letter he wrote saying that he will be (like) a newly born Catholic. However, some also say that Rizal signs the letter because the dates did not match the writing. Despite this, I believe that Rizal is firm in his decisions and beliefs and he would not sign the letter himself. However, viewing the letter for his technical marriage proposal for his beloved lover, I think they could've sworn their love of each other despite the formal marriage contract they wouldn't be able to avail.
The retraction of Rizal misaligned how we understood Rizal, fighting for the freedom of Filipino through his works and writings. This video specifies the details of the retraction of Rizal and brings out possible theories that may support each claim about the retraction letter. Somehow, this interests me in the way that theories were produced because of a certain action that Rizal has taken before his death.
Thank you sir for this very informative video! I was able to learn more about the details of the Retraction of Dr. Jose Rizal and helped me able to understand every single detail of his retraction, which is essential in learning our history, specifically our national heroes.
Ang galing. Sobra. Walang kumpas lahat ng ebidensya
Watching this for our RPH.
Ang galing nito! Maraming salamat po sa pagbabahagi!
49:45 true sir. We have to know if it is credible source.
Hindi man natin siguro malalaman na kung ang Retraction ni Rizal ay totoo o inde, dapat parin antin bigyang respeto ang mga naidulot ni Rizal sa ating bansa. Nakakatuwa na kahit matagal na hindi nasasagot ang issue na ito, ay madami pa rin ang nagsasaliksik at naghahanap ng katotohanan patungkol dito. Dahil sa video na ito ay mas marami pa akong nalaman tungkol sa Retraction ni Rizal.
26:49 |53:28 Eto pala yun
Isa sa mga kontrobersyal na isyu o kaganapan, na hanggang ngayon ay walang kasiguraduhan, ay ang retraksyon ni Rizal, kung saan siya ay umamin ng pagkakamali at nagbigay ng pagsisisi sa kanyang mga naunang paninindigan laban sa simbahan. Bagama’t ay maraming taon na ang nakalilipas, kung totoo man na isinulat ni Rizal ang retraksyon, maaari kayang magkaroon ito ng epekto sa kanyang reputasyon bilang bayani ng bansa?
It could have been true that Rizal wrote the retraction letter but the situation has turned Rizal’s mental state into mush, everyone can break for a moment. Even Jesus asked God why has God forsaken him. Maaaring ginawa nga iyon ni Rizal pero hindi ito totoo sa kanyang puso, kung ikukumpara mo ito sa kanyang mga sulatin mula sa kanyang mga Nobela o iyong mga gawa nila sa La Solidaridad bilang ilustrado. Kataka-takang luluhod si Rizal kay padre damaso.
Awesome video! Thank you!
Thank you po this is so useful for my subject in college
Thank you so much po❤️
Totoo nga ba o hindi ang lagda at laman ng retraction letter ni Rizal? Ngayon ay wala pa ring nakakaalam. Pero ano nga bang mangyayari sa imahe ni Rizal kung mapapatunayan na ito'y totoo? Babawiin ba ang kanyang pamagat na bayani? O patuloy pa rin siyang magiging national hero?
ATTENDANCE CHECK FOR RPH CLASS
MILO PRESENT
Masasabi kong nagkaroon ako ng bagong perspective kay Rizal dahil sa alleged retraction niya at ang kaugnayan nito sa Catholic Church, at ang pananaw niya sa mga prayle noong panahon niya. Ngunit, sumsang-ayon ako na hindi nababaliwala ang mga sakripisyo niya para sa bayan, kung totoo man ang retraction o hindi.