Yeah they looked pretty good. I don't even wanna know what he would say about my concert footage lol the 1 I get is like maybe come in a little tighter but also like Slash with the double chin. But those are things id look out for but other than that I know tons of non photographers who would see these photos and be just blown away.
I respect your opinion but this time I think you were a bit to harsh on the guy. En to much a plug for your presets. The photos in his circumstances are so hard to make. Not you average pop concert. This are metal concerts . Almost always backlit and not much front light.
I've done heavy metal and hardcore concert photography before, and I completely agree. Getting good shots is next to impossible, that's why most photographers just go for the flash/fisheye combo to get super unique perspectives.
Pretty huge metal concerts at that with Priest & Slayer. Pit will be full of other photographers, limiting movement and it will be a very hard three song ruling, else people will get injured if the pit isn't clear for the crowd surfers coming over the top...
i think what fro is saying it " Get better" It may be a hard shooting situation, but clients arent going to say "well I'll settle for this", you HAVE to get better no matter what it takes to take your photography to the next level. Fro has done his share of concerts, I'm sure he know just how hard it is to get a good shot. So it means listen to what he is saying and learn to get better, not to complain
Sorry Jared, completely disagree about 4:28. the key point of that photo was the lighting, not the face of the performer. The angle adds power to the singers stance and it looks like light is coming directly out of the microphone. Much more creative than getting a boring old face shot.
I usualy agree with your critiques but not here. Most of this guy's photos were actualy pretty good and gave a good mood and atmosphere to metal concerts. Asides the first Slash photo that was a bit average and the Judas Priest shot that was a bit under-edited (although I'm sure it's his stylistic choice, not a lack of skills), I did enjoyed most of the photos.
One thing i notice is that you are a bit simple-minded in terms of stuff like exposure and framing, no offense. Some photos look a lot better when they’re backlit and off-centered, and a lack of colors in the stage lights can make it much more dramatic. I personally really liked all of these photos.
I think some of this advice is totally off base, but some of it is really good. Why take such a hard critique from someone that has never made a living shooting live music in the first place? Agree: The Slash photo - yes, he has a double chin. As a concert photographer you have to look at every photo as if it was a photo of yourself. So weird faces/posture, etc. You have to take all of that into consideration when putting your work out into the world. You have to ask yourself, would I want this photo of my circulating the internet? Halestorm photo - all good. Just a common photo. Pyro shot - cool shot. Dont Agree: Second photo of Jinjer is fine. A vertical crop could work as well. This is definitely an opening band.. these are most likely house lights. So why aren't you congratualting the photographer for capturing such a raw/powerful moment in far less than perfect circumstances? I think it's a good shot. Third photo of Slayer. The shot is loose and has lots of negative space around the subject...but what's wrong with that? It's showing off the atmosphere. It's showing tons of haze and shows a nice piece of the scrim hanging in the back. It makes the stage look huge. It's breathes ambience. I do think it should be cropped in from the top left JUST a tad to offset the bass. Other than that, its a nice action shot with solid theatrics behind it. You say you have to fill the frame much tighter, but why? You're shooting a concert, not portraits of the artists. Fourth photo is Beyond the Black, not Halestorm. You could have figured that out if you read the caption haha. Microphone mouth works in certain cases. This is on the border of being one of them. The exposure looks fine to me. you don't always have to see the artists full face to capture a compelling image. The angle at which it is shot makes the singer look extremely powerful and it matches her stance. The light rays shining through her just add to it. Plus the way her dress is falling behind her just works with the photo. I definitely don't think it's a throwaway image. It doesn't reveal anything in her crotch area, so what's the problem? I think this shot is epic. Shows great lighting, great posture, great haze. Gabrielle photo - Why the fuck does it matter if there are lights on the artists face? It's a good shot of the performance. The image evokes emotion. That show is clearly going to be extremely backlit due to the massive wall of LED panels behind the lead singer. Silhouette shots are definitely cool, and I dig this shot. I think it could be straightened out a bit. Judas Priest - Photo processing is fine. It's a matter of personal taste. It's a good shot, colors look nice and accurate. You're just using it as an excuse to push your corny presets. Which is bullshit. Dutch angle / straight angle works both ways on the last shot. Either way it's a compelling well shot image. --- I've been making a living shooting concerts/touring with bands for the last couple of years. Concert photography will always come down to personal taste and I find a lot of your critiques to be in a poor taste. Art is subjective and concert photography is definitely a form of art. I've gone through phases of only shooting shows with a 50, I've shot sets exclusively shooting 16mm. It just depends on the vibe you're going for and how you want to portray the show. That's what's so great about concert photography. You can throw 10 photogs in the pit and the results are going to be vastly different. From the focal lengths, angles, and post processing. It's all going to be different. I don't think there is one right way to do it. Of course there are tips and tricks along the way, and the standard rules of photography will always work here, but that's not the only thing that looks good. You have a very old school mentality when it comes to shooting live music. That mentality is a dying breed of shooters and the new age, artistic photographers are really taking off and finding massive success in the industry. They are the ones getting paid to go on tour and getting paid to shoot shows.
All of these photos are great. I agree with tightening up some of the competitions, but all really good. Some of the backlit photos were actually my favourites.
THANK YOU! You gave an honest and fair evaluation of concert photography. There is a ton of this kind of stuff out there that could use a lot of work. If it doesn't work then some people call it art and then expect it to work and it still does not. What really gets me is the people going that's amazing and incredible when the work could be so much better. Mic mouth and everything centered drives me up the wall. Bad exposure and shadow faces drive me crazy. FILL THE FRAME! THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU! -R
I get where he’s coming from from a photographers point of view but show these to any band and they would be stoked to have you photograph their shows!!
I actually didn’t mind the composition that you hated. Cropping in tight might be good for black and white with an intense facial expression but with amazing stage back lights shining through the haze you want to give the composition breathing space to take in the atmosphere. But I do agree with microphone mouth. Helps to take those shots from the side. Something I don’t worry about shooting bodybuilding shows.
The 3 song in the pit rule can help you be more creative and resourceful. You have to plan out your shooting priorities, use your networking skills with promoters, arena staff, & the talents personnel, use your people skills with the crowd, & learn how faster workflows to have your photos seen 1st and remembered as the official moments of the show. IMO you have to study an artist prior shows (do an instagram search) and that will help you construct a shot list. Also IMO the best shots to get in the pit are personality (clothes or fan interaction) shots & expressions, not really performance shots, get a tele lens for that.
Felt that this critique was more of a lets "slate every piece of work" vibe rather than fully explaining how to make your images "Boom". Explain properly what you mean by boom because half of us probably didn't have a clue what you was on about.. Also I would love to see some of your concert photo's as you seem to have far superior expertises as to what a concert photo should turn out like. Muchas Gracias' :)
4:29 I disagree. What I see there is not a singer with "mouth and microphone" etc before I notice the pyramid of light, legs and her cloth on her back, leading to her head and the spotlight. Yes, her face is a bit too dark but I would not expect otherwise since the light right on her back. The composition is just great, I wouldn't change a thing. It's not a shot about someone singing, it's the whole thing. Shot from the bottom, it looks intimidating, and just great.
Nearly every headlining national music act I've photographed designates that you must only photograph from the pit and even then you usually only get 3 songs to shoot. And that was always for all photographers whether they're there for their own portfolio, press coverage or there for an 'official shooting for the concert itself' capacity. Edit; after watching the video, I'm very surprised Jared Polin didn't mention that that is very common practice?
The big mistake is to go wide when in the pit. Go 85mm at least and shoot extreme closeups and half or even full body shots of musicians on the other end of your end of the stage. Less underneath that way. Wide is about as interesting for concerts as it is for landscapes, unless you can really pull off a good composition with something in the foreground very close to the lens.
I'm an amateur gig photographer and I shat my pants watching this critique! I know he's right about the flaws in the photos, but it makes me side-eye everything I've shot so far and thought was decent XD
Don't worry. I get Jared seemed harsh, but if he didn't recognise Richie Faulkner or Tom Araya by sight, he has probably never shot a huge band metal gig before. These photos were good considering the limitations that will have been in place to shoot some of the biggest acts in the scene.
08:10 is Richie Faulkner from Judas Priest! He suffered a major aortic dissection during a solo of Painkiller, finished the solo then went straight to the hospital for emergency surgery. Total badass dude!
Grammar Police alert: No need for apostrophe in "Faves". Great critique. I have a friend who is able to shoot from a photo pit. His stuff comes out pretty much like these.
I saw it. It was definitely going to piss a lot of people off. It was for the best if Jared didn't show it. Good capture photography wise (in my opinion) but waaaaaaay too touchy of a subject. I'll describe it to you if you want. Lol
I like the photos! The only thing that was bugging me, and Jared pointed it out, is all the extra space at the top of the photos. A tighter crop on most of them would make them better.
I’m shooting my first concert on Memorial Day. I’ll have access to shoot from the stage and the pit. Smaller show but should be a good opportunity to take your feedback and apply it.
shooting from the pit is not all it's cracked up to be. Too many times you're shooting up the nose of the performers. Not the best angle. I know, you gotta take what you can get. I'm the house photographer at a small club in New York and I love that I can get straight-on shots of the performers. Much better perspective, and I don't have the ceiling in the background. Yeah, maybe I don't get all the fancy lighting but I can live with that.
I'd like to see more like this. My boyfriend is in a band and I like taking pictures of them. It is not alway as easy as some people seem to think it is. Thanks for making a video that is not about sony cameras. I was starting to wonder if you should change your name to Froknowssony.
Sony is making $500 cameras that destroy $2,000 canon or nikon cameras. I didn't want to like Sony I hated on them so hard until I realized Sony and Fuji are just dominating the game right now. I don't know who is buying a canon DSLR right now.
i don't know for what purpose you state that a picture is nice or not, for example, the one subtitled "gabrielle" surely it's got no light on the face and it won't make it to the family book of the singer, but the square and triangle shapes on the background could make for a decent image and you didnt even mention it. Aswell as other photos have some other interesting things to be aware of, and you've just weeped about "crop" and "face" all the way through. I'm sorry but this time i think you could've done better, Jared.
good critique would be handy if everyone who puts their work forward for these videos actually put the exif data and details on the pictures it would be much more detail on how to improve etc
Great job, Jared! You have no idea how much I enjoy these critiques! Too bad he didn’t have his gear info. How can you so easily tell the difference between a snapshot and a great shot? Is it the “pop” factor of the photo?
Noealz Photo I agree. It’s obvious that this photographer has the idea and knows what he’s doing. I feel as if fro is understands that. Hence the harsh criticism.
He's on point. I've shot in the pit and personally don't care for it. Despite the closeness to the artist, you still need to get a good exposure, pose and composition. You can get a few hundred shots in the 3 songs you are allocated, but you need to sort your images and choose only the best.
How are you today?
Jared Polin Good Jared! Hbu?
Doing alright Jared, hows the business?
Jared Polin you inspire me so much jared, watching your TH-cam channel grow from reviewing products in photography store to this. Quality youtuber!
Jared Polin Jared, fine thanks, hope you are too... love your vids, keep ‘em coming... 👍👍😎
Jared Polin after i accidentally destroyed my d2x hurmm i can consider its a good day maybe
Idk about y’all...but a lot of these pics looked great to me.
J Johnson I thought so too!! I don’t know what he is talking about... I think they are amazing
Yeah man I don’t agree with his taste half the time haha
I was shocked.... these photos are fantastic!!! He seems to be hating hard 😂😂
Yeah they looked pretty good. I don't even wanna know what he would say about my concert footage lol the 1 I get is like maybe come in a little tighter but also like Slash with the double chin. But those are things id look out for but other than that I know tons of non photographers who would see these photos and be just blown away.
I respect your opinion but this time I think you were a bit to harsh on the guy. En to much a plug for your presets. The photos in his circumstances are so hard to make. Not you average pop concert. This are metal concerts . Almost always backlit and not much front light.
I've done heavy metal and hardcore concert photography before, and I completely agree. Getting good shots is next to impossible, that's why most photographers just go for the flash/fisheye combo to get super unique perspectives.
I completely agree. Almost to the point of Fro just being a dick today...
Pretty huge metal concerts at that with Priest & Slayer.
Pit will be full of other photographers, limiting movement and it will be a very hard three song ruling, else people will get injured if the pit isn't clear for the crowd surfers coming over the top...
@@scriptosaurusrex completely agreed. Bin there my self its really hard to get a good composition.
i think what fro is saying it " Get better" It may be a hard shooting situation, but clients arent going to say "well I'll settle for this", you HAVE to get better no matter what it takes to take your photography to the next level. Fro has done his share of concerts, I'm sure he know just how hard it is to get a good shot. So it means listen to what he is saying and learn to get better, not to complain
Sorry Jared, completely disagree about 4:28. the key point of that photo was the lighting, not the face of the performer. The angle adds power to the singers stance and it looks like light is coming directly out of the microphone. Much more creative than getting a boring old face shot.
Godrays are not creative - they're cliche.
"It's a bassist"
Dude, that's Tom Araya from Slayer. Legend.
Also, check out "Pisces" from the band Jinjer (photo 2).
Lol. I'm sure a lot of people heard that and had a good laugh. 😁
Yeah, this is the very reason why he didn't manage to live off of concert photography. Always, ALWAYS know who you're shooting, mate.
I usualy agree with your critiques but not here. Most of this guy's photos were actualy pretty good and gave a good mood and atmosphere to metal concerts. Asides the first Slash photo that was a bit average and the Judas Priest shot that was a bit under-edited (although I'm sure it's his stylistic choice, not a lack of skills), I did enjoyed most of the photos.
One thing i notice is that you are a bit simple-minded in terms of stuff like exposure and framing, no offense. Some photos look a lot better when they’re backlit and off-centered, and a lack of colors in the stage lights can make it much more dramatic. I personally really liked all of these photos.
I think some of this advice is totally off base, but some of it is really good. Why take such a hard critique from someone that has never made a living shooting live music in the first place?
Agree:
The Slash photo - yes, he has a double chin. As a concert photographer you have to look at every photo as if it was a photo of yourself. So weird faces/posture, etc. You have to take all of that into consideration when putting your work out into the world. You have to ask yourself, would I want this photo of my circulating the internet?
Halestorm photo - all good. Just a common photo.
Pyro shot - cool shot.
Dont Agree:
Second photo of Jinjer is fine. A vertical crop could work as well. This is definitely an opening band.. these are most likely house lights. So why aren't you congratualting the photographer for capturing such a raw/powerful moment in far less than perfect circumstances? I think it's a good shot.
Third photo of Slayer. The shot is loose and has lots of negative space around the subject...but what's wrong with that? It's showing off the atmosphere. It's showing tons of haze and shows a nice piece of the scrim hanging in the back. It makes the stage look huge. It's breathes ambience. I do think it should be cropped in from the top left JUST a tad to offset the bass. Other than that, its a nice action shot with solid theatrics behind it. You say you have to fill the frame much tighter, but why? You're shooting a concert, not portraits of the artists.
Fourth photo is Beyond the Black, not Halestorm. You could have figured that out if you read the caption haha. Microphone mouth works in certain cases. This is on the border of being one of them. The exposure looks fine to me. you don't always have to see the artists full face to capture a compelling image. The angle at which it is shot makes the singer look extremely powerful and it matches her stance. The light rays shining through her just add to it. Plus the way her dress is falling behind her just works with the photo. I definitely don't think it's a throwaway image. It doesn't reveal anything in her crotch area, so what's the problem? I think this shot is epic. Shows great lighting, great posture, great haze.
Gabrielle photo - Why the fuck does it matter if there are lights on the artists face? It's a good shot of the performance. The image evokes emotion. That show is clearly going to be extremely backlit due to the massive wall of LED panels behind the lead singer. Silhouette shots are definitely cool, and I dig this shot. I think it could be straightened out a bit.
Judas Priest - Photo processing is fine. It's a matter of personal taste. It's a good shot, colors look nice and accurate. You're just using it as an excuse to push your corny presets. Which is bullshit.
Dutch angle / straight angle works both ways on the last shot. Either way it's a compelling well shot image.
---
I've been making a living shooting concerts/touring with bands for the last couple of years. Concert photography will always come down to personal taste and I find a lot of your critiques to be in a poor taste. Art is subjective and concert photography is definitely a form of art. I've gone through phases of only shooting shows with a 50, I've shot sets exclusively shooting 16mm. It just depends on the vibe you're going for and how you want to portray the show. That's what's so great about concert photography. You can throw 10 photogs in the pit and the results are going to be vastly different. From the focal lengths, angles, and post processing. It's all going to be different. I don't think there is one right way to do it. Of course there are tips and tricks along the way, and the standard rules of photography will always work here, but that's not the only thing that looks good. You have a very old school mentality when it comes to shooting live music. That mentality is a dying breed of shooters and the new age, artistic photographers are really taking off and finding massive success in the industry. They are the ones getting paid to go on tour and getting paid to shoot shows.
Yes I got paid to tour. Thanks.
I'm glad that's all you have to say.
You are spot on Jacob about everything. These are great shots for the most part.
I am unsubscribed jared because of this video.
It's called Art, Jared
I actually thought the second photo was great! Just goes to show the nature of art: one person may love it while another might not like it.
I actually liked the slayer shot. The use of color and smoke is dramatic and a cool capture for a thrash metal lead singer.
All of these photos are great. I agree with tightening up some of the competitions, but all really good. Some of the backlit photos were actually my favourites.
THANK YOU! You gave an honest and fair evaluation of concert photography. There is a ton of this kind of stuff out there that could use a lot of work. If it doesn't work then some people call it art and then expect it to work and it still does not. What really gets me is the people going that's amazing and incredible when the work could be so much better. Mic mouth and everything centered drives me up the wall. Bad exposure and shadow faces drive me crazy. FILL THE FRAME! THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU! -R
I get where he’s coming from from a photographers point of view but show these to any band and they would be stoked to have you photograph their shows!!
Kudos to you Boris! I am a concert photographer myself and I like what you managed to get in the conditions you are getting it!
I love the fact that Slash is wearing a AC/DC T-Shirt :)
I actually didn’t mind the composition that you hated. Cropping in tight might be good for black and white with an intense facial expression but with amazing stage back lights shining through the haze you want to give the composition breathing space to take in the atmosphere.
But I do agree with microphone mouth. Helps to take those shots from the side. Something I don’t worry about shooting bodybuilding shows.
@Jared Polin, While you are taking the picture in a Mac before you let go of the keys to take the pic you can hit ESC to exit the picture taking mode.
The 3 song in the pit rule can help you be more creative and resourceful. You have to plan out your shooting priorities, use your networking skills with promoters, arena staff, & the talents personnel, use your people skills with the crowd, & learn how faster workflows to have your photos seen 1st and remembered as the official moments of the show. IMO you have to study an artist prior shows (do an instagram search) and that will help you construct a shot list. Also IMO the best shots to get in the pit are personality (clothes or fan interaction) shots & expressions, not really performance shots, get a tele lens for that.
Felt that this critique was more of a lets "slate every piece of work" vibe rather than fully explaining how to make your images "Boom". Explain properly what you mean by boom because half of us probably didn't have a clue what you was on about.. Also I would love to see some of your concert photo's as you seem to have far superior expertises as to what a concert photo should turn out like. Muchas Gracias' :)
Kinda curious what that last photo was lol
www.flickr.com/gp/boris_danielsen/5S763i
@@borisdanielsen6890 Edgy...
@@borisdanielsen6890 OH!! Ummmm...yeah. That's going to ruffle a few feathers. But photographic wise, great capture!
4:29 I disagree. What I see there is not a singer with "mouth and microphone" etc before I notice the pyramid of light, legs and her cloth on her back, leading to her head and the spotlight. Yes, her face is a bit too dark but I would not expect otherwise since the light right on her back. The composition is just great, I wouldn't change a thing. It's not a shot about someone singing, it's the whole thing. Shot from the bottom, it looks intimidating, and just great.
Nearly every headlining national music act I've photographed designates that you must only photograph from the pit and even then you usually only get 3 songs to shoot. And that was always for all photographers whether they're there for their own portfolio, press coverage or there for an 'official shooting for the concert itself' capacity.
Edit; after watching the video, I'm very surprised Jared Polin didn't mention that that is very common practice?
Cropping and postprocessing is a personal choice. And the photographer does it his way.
The big mistake is to go wide when in the pit. Go 85mm at least and shoot extreme closeups and half or even full body shots of musicians on the other end of your end of the stage. Less underneath that way. Wide is about as interesting for concerts as it is for landscapes, unless you can really pull off a good composition with something in the foreground very close to the lens.
Shot my first bar music festical at the weekend...and had Jarid in my ear the whole time, keeping it honest!
I'm an amateur gig photographer and I shat my pants watching this critique! I know he's right about the flaws in the photos, but it makes me side-eye everything I've shot so far and thought was decent XD
Don't worry. I get Jared seemed harsh, but if he didn't recognise Richie Faulkner or Tom Araya by sight, he has probably never shot a huge band metal gig before. These photos were good considering the limitations that will have been in place to shoot some of the biggest acts in the scene.
08:10 is Richie Faulkner from Judas Priest! He suffered a major aortic dissection during a solo of Painkiller, finished the solo then went straight to the hospital for emergency surgery. Total badass dude!
Grammar Police alert: No need for apostrophe in "Faves". Great critique. I have a friend who is able to shoot from a photo pit. His stuff comes out pretty much like these.
Jared can you show us your shots for concert?
How come you skipped and blurred out the last photo?
I didn’t like it.
I saw it. It was definitely going to piss a lot of people off. It was for the best if Jared didn't show it. Good capture photography wise (in my opinion) but waaaaaaay too touchy of a subject. I'll describe it to you if you want. Lol
I like the photos! The only thing that was bugging me, and Jared pointed it out, is all the extra space at the top of the photos. A tighter crop on most of them would make them better.
Black & White and Rock & Roll were made for each other.
⭐ ⭐ ⭐ 🌴 📸
What lens is best taking photos at concerts or gigs inside
Now I remember why I stopped watching your videos. Instead of helping vibes it's more like hate vibes. Not cool.
That was cool thanks man!
That’s so funny that after so many years, Jared still says, “horizontical” lol
Might as well be an alt term for diagonal but we all know how much more missed than hit it is trying to Dutch it
Honestly if you go through his fotostream he has a lot of great photos there.
He just didn't selected the best for the critique.
Dude ive shot so many shows in NY / NJ / philla area and yes, there are very VERY few people who can make a living doing it. Unfortunately
Love the honest reviews and you're not just being false positive, which is what you see a lot of nowadays. Appreciate that.
What happened to the last photo? You 86'd it with no explanation?
If you go to the guys Flickr page you'll see why not critiquing it was the right decision.
I’m shooting my first concert on Memorial Day. I’ll have access to shoot from the stage and the pit. Smaller show but should be a good opportunity to take your feedback and apply it.
All the pit photos should have been vertical. Too many cut-offs at joints. A big no-no.
Great info bud thanks for the post..
Seemed like you was a little harsh on the critique this time. I thought the images were great, but I don’t do concert photos.
shooting from the pit is not all it's cracked up to be. Too many times you're shooting up the nose of the performers. Not the best angle. I know, you gotta take what you can get. I'm the house photographer at a small club in New York and I love that I can get straight-on shots of the performers. Much better perspective, and I don't have the ceiling in the background. Yeah, maybe I don't get all the fancy lighting but I can live with that.
I'd like to see more like this. My boyfriend is in a band and I like taking pictures of them. It is not alway as easy as some people seem to think it is. Thanks for making a video that is not about sony cameras. I was starting to wonder if you should change your name to Froknowssony.
Sony is making $500 cameras that destroy $2,000 canon or nikon cameras. I didn't want to like Sony I hated on them so hard until I realized Sony and Fuji are just dominating the game right now. I don't know who is buying a canon DSLR right now.
I like the way you precompose the images 🤘
i don't know for what purpose you state that a picture is nice or not, for example, the one subtitled "gabrielle" surely it's got no light on the face and it won't make it to the family book of the singer, but the square and triangle shapes on the background could make for a decent image and you didnt even mention it. Aswell as other photos have some other interesting things to be aware of, and you've just weeped about "crop" and "face" all the way through. I'm sorry but this time i think you could've done better, Jared.
What do you mean by Dutch angle? Though im Dutch i never heart that expression .
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_angle
for me...its critism to sell his packages 😏
Why you gotta talk about double chin Slash and not rocking Slash? That's Slash!
Love your videos
good critique would be handy if everyone who puts their work forward for these videos actually put the exif data and details on the pictures it would be much more detail on how to improve etc
Woody's Photo's if you go to his site it shows up there. He is shooting a Nikon D7000 with a Tamron lens.
✍ Dont ✍ Have ✍ Jared ✍ Judge ✍ My ✍ Photos ✍ EVER ✍
Got it! 😎🤙🏻
Great job, Jared! You have no idea how much I enjoy these critiques! Too bad he didn’t have his gear info. How can you so easily tell the difference between a snapshot and a great shot? Is it the “pop” factor of the photo?
bngr bngr I hear ya. My guess is that he brought a 50 and shot everything with that
some good images in there - but tough love is needed to improve~
Noealz Photo I agree. It’s obvious that this photographer has the idea and knows what he’s doing. I feel as if fro is understands that. Hence the harsh criticism.
@@jacobjohnson2116 : ) good good, we all need a good ass whooping from time to time lol
Poor Boris , bit harsh
I like most of your photos bro 👍🏾
Shot 2 is the band Jinjer. Definitely not an opening band
SLAYER!!!!!!!
who miss train track photos and Jarared reaction ?
some of them aren't that bad
Sir please make another video on best gears camera and lens which is still very good and discontinue by the camera company
Dude these photos are great idk wtf you're saying here lol.
Very good …………
Jared, I can't take you seriously with your right T-Shirt sleeve cuff turned up 👕hahaha
Fro, you dont know who Tom Araya is? It s a bassist! WTF
Slash common
These critiques are crap now,
If you’re going to make a statement like that back it up. Don’t just say something stupid, explain why or go away. It’s called a critique.
Shooting from the pit = crotch shots. Amen Jared.
wack critiques tbh
Slashknowsphoto
She's eating the mic 😂
3:29 "Horizontical"
I’m a concert photographer-her and I agree with you more than the other comments, cool video
👍
And this why I don’t watch this guy.
I never knew a person can be so negative...
He's on point.
I've shot in the pit and personally don't care for it. Despite the closeness to the artist, you still need to get a good exposure, pose and composition.
You can get a few hundred shots in the 3 songs you are allocated, but you need to sort your images and choose only the best.
Is he wrong tho? It's the only way he can make Boris better
Negative? Its called critique and it is a constructive one.
First 😂
second 😊