Could Richard Dawkins Inadvertently Lead People to Religion? | Alister McGrath | SOCRATES IN OXFORD

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 43

  • @craigbenz4835
    @craigbenz4835 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    McGrath's definition of positivism doesn't match with mine. Mine is more like: We can know and solve everything. I reject my version of positivism.

  • @cptrikester2671
    @cptrikester2671 18 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

    So glad I NEVER bought into the arrogance of Dawkins' delusions.
    He may be really good for the non-discerning types.
    Couldn't understand why so many people accepted his rhetoric.

  • @junacebedo888
    @junacebedo888 23 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

    Science cannot be tested scientifically. You can only BELIEVE it is scientific.

    • @davethebrahman9870
      @davethebrahman9870 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@junacebedo888 That’s incredibly silly. Science is simply a method by which we systematically exclude bias, deception and wishful thinking.

    • @junacebedo888
      @junacebedo888 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      @davethebrahman9870 Who had tested science?

    • @davethebrahman9870
      @davethebrahman9870 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@junacebedo888 What are you trying to ask? Science is a method, it is tested every time you turn on a light or watch television.

    • @davethebrahman9870
      @davethebrahman9870 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

      @ I already answered that. Every one of the millions of experiments done using observation, hypothesis and novel testable predictions has been a test of science. You are testing science when you type on a computer.

    • @junacebedo888
      @junacebedo888 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      @davethebrahman9870 Still, you can't test science. It just work or fail. See?

  • @terraavis
    @terraavis วันที่ผ่านมา

    Yes. Even advertently he could.

  • @edbrackeen5979
    @edbrackeen5979 วันที่ผ่านมา

    If people turn from atheism to religion they are still on yhe same road to Hell.
    In order to be saved a person must turn to Jesus as the one true God that became a man like us yet without sin and shed his perfect God blood on the cross as he bodily died for our sin and one must believe Jesus rose from the dead bodily to overcome death for all who will call his name and believe in their heart that he lives.

  • @davethebrahman9870
    @davethebrahman9870 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Who knows? Religious people aren’t known for their intellect.

    • @byrondickens
      @byrondickens วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      Yeah. Like Thomas Aquinas, Issac Newton , Immanuel Kant, Werner Heisenberg, Max Planck....

    • @davethebrahman9870
      @davethebrahman9870 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @ Are any of the people you mention alive?

    • @doscojones6404
      @doscojones6404 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Try John Bergsma, Scott Hahn, John Lennox even Jimmy Akin. Seek and ye shall find.
      Edit: Add Jonathan Pageau to the list.

    • @davethebrahman9870
      @davethebrahman9870 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @ The people you mention are so intellectually vapid that it is surprising even a Christian can’t see through them. Lennox and Aikin are simply blowhards.

    • @ldevon2318
      @ldevon2318 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Nice one Dave… 🥴

  • @ji8044
    @ji8044 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Why are religious conservatives so obsessed with Richard Dawkins? He ranks second only to Darwin on your hit list I believe.
    For the 73,845th time, there is no atheist religion. We don't have meetings once a week, or a book, or clergy (especially not Dawkins). There are no atheist hymns which we all know the words to and we don't have ranks or tithes to worry about. Ok, now back to your obsession, already in progress.

    • @hwd7
      @hwd7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      >>>Why are religious conservatives so obsessed with Richard Dawkins?>He ranks second only to Darwin on your hit list I believe.or a book,or clergy (especially not Dawkins).Ok, now back to your obsession, already in progress.

    • @ji8044
      @ji8044 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@hwd7 Your information is sheer idiocy
      For instance
      "Darwin inspired eugenics which inspired Margaret Sanger which has led to the abortion of 60 million children.
      Not to mention Hitler's Holocaust and Scientific Racism."
      Darwinism was absolutely abhorrent to the Nazis. How on earth do you think their idea of a master race, which came from a man named Houston Chamberlain not Darwin, would square with being descended from primates? Margaret Sanger was a Roman Catholic of course, as was Hitler and most of the Nazi leadership. Her mother had ELEVEN children and SEVEN miscarriages, which all biographies of her agree was the source of her birth control promotion. As a Catholic her mother could not practice any form of birth control.
      You really have very little education outside of memes, so if you reply it will only cause you further embarrassment.

    • @primitivaroots
      @primitivaroots วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      Why are you so obsessed with religious conservatives?

    • @edbrackeen5979
      @edbrackeen5979 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      You are definitely a religious zealot for your nonreligion.

    • @ji8044
      @ji8044 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@edbrackeen5979 Thank you for proving my point.
      So please list all the tenets of atheism and where you found them. I could list a dozen for Christianity, Judaism or Islam. Give it a shot.