Lee Phillip Show--Edith Head, Hildegarde, 1963 TV

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ค. 2024
  • Lee Phillip, a popular Chicago talk-show host, interviews costume designer Edith Head and cabaret legend Hildegarde in this 1963 program.
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @tammyz7689
    @tammyz7689 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Edith head is class personified. She knew fashion. Many of her designs are timeless and could be worn today. Beautiful ❤️💕💝

  • @kidbacteria
    @kidbacteria 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Rest in Peace: Lee Phillip Bell. You are an Angel of Light in Heaven.

  • @Marcel_Audubon
    @Marcel_Audubon 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    what a lively conversation! looks like one long take, all live, too.

  • @sandrasanders706
    @sandrasanders706 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This takes me back..coming home for lunch..watching Lee Phillips...or Bozo on Channel 9....and in the summer, As The World Turns right after Lee's show..definently Chicago's First Lady of Television. A class act! RIPH..William & Lee Phillip Bell.

  • @slcdesign212
    @slcdesign212 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Love how they tried to help rescues back then.

  • @mmcost
    @mmcost 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    OMG this is amazing!!!!!!Always heard of Lee Philip being the first Oprah in chicago,thank you so much for this rare find.Bravo!!!!!!luv your channel btw...................any more Dinah from the 70s?happy holidays

  • @kennethkinsey659
    @kennethkinsey659 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Of course, Lee Phillip was married to soap-opera writer Bill Bell; together they created and produced the still-popular soaps "The Young and the Restless" and "The Bold and the Beautiful." At this write, Lee Phillip Bell still lives in Beverly Hills.

  • @sarahleach9997
    @sarahleach9997 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very good thanks

  • @DeepScreenAnalysis
    @DeepScreenAnalysis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Incidentally, host Lee Philip would go on to co-create fashion soap opera "The Bold and the Beautiful".

  • @MovieJon
    @MovieJon 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    When sponsors BRAGGED about adding as many complicated chemicals as possible to the detergents we wash clothes with (that will then be adhered to our bodies all day....!) LOL

  • @bennyjazzful
    @bennyjazzful 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    WOW WOW WOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
    From a mad keen 77yo Aussie fan.
    True stars,not like the so called Divas today.

  • @michaelmancini5041
    @michaelmancini5041 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    there is a lady....

  • @dxmxo9427
    @dxmxo9427 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hildegarde was so silly

  • @sandrasanders706
    @sandrasanders706 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The comment about the skirt being "short"..lol. I wonder what they thought when the mini skirt came in, which would be 64-65? ..If there were here today and saw the way teens and women dress today..they would pass out!...lol

    • @kekedarius4957
      @kekedarius4957 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don't know Edith's actual thoughts about it (whether she disagrees or. not), but in her job to dress a character we do see that she changes with the times (not just the fashion). I think for Edith to design that, it had to be because of the character and the setting. So for example, a few months later than this, in 65's Love Has Many Faces, the setting allows/calls for more skin to be on shown. Granted, in the design for bathing suits, this is pretty usual, but we see an intermediary between bathing suits and evening wear where there are a number of very short playsuits. Of course, even the shortest of pant allows for more 'modesty' than a short skirt. And I mean, in '69 there was Sweet Charity and there are few films that embody the 60's mod mini skirt feel like that. The miniskirts here of course fitted the characters and settings. You might even say that despite whatever she actually might have thought, Edith Head through Sweet Charity alone launched the miniskirt even more through this film.

  • @sandrasanders706
    @sandrasanders706 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What was the actual date of this program?

  • @Melons-vg8dq
    @Melons-vg8dq ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Edith would have been enough. Hildegard was superflurous.

    • @Marcel_Audubon
      @Marcel_Audubon 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You spelled Incomparable wrong