Never going to happen, they write the laws and pillow talk about legislation isn't illegal. I'm talking about stock market purchases. A few years ago some politicians went outside, made a phone call and I never heard about anything happened to them. They are untouchable unless they piss people off.
Don’t forget trump doesn’t count because he never swore an oath to the constitution! -This was (and likely still will be) his actual defence in one of his Insurrection “inquiries”.
" we the people" are the ones that put them in power in the first place .... somone needs to hold " we the people" accountable for the garbage goverment they keep electing.
The orange idiot did just get held accountable to an extent but he was treated with velvet gloves. Anyone else committing contempt that many times would be locked up at least once for 24 hours
@@donaldcarpenter5328Trump? This is exactly what annoys me. Trump is the most investigated person on the planet and the Democrats had to twist the law to get him. They looked at any which way. Is that what you are advocating for? I thought it's about investigating a crime and find the guilty. Not investigate someone until you find a crime.
Because she has extra privileges and protection, and the opportunity to defraud the very people that elected her, and she committed the theft publicly and willingly. I WOULD RECOMMEND SHE AND THE JUDGE GET THE FIRING SQUAD !!
True in politics. Saw a lot of this with prosecutors and judges in Trump‘s trail. They were also going after Trump with a vengeance and they wanted to see him hang so they lied and lied.
Yes it's 2 tiered, the better your lawyer the more justice you receive. The poor get the shaft while the rich get a golden get out of jail free ticket.
@@victorcaceres9603 it's America, you get the justice you can afford. My advice, don't do the crime if you can't do the time. The lawyer in the short compares 2 cases that are totally different. One involved grand theft and the other perjury. 4 months was a gift, she should have gotten at least a year.
@@adonis8289 What a simplistic statement. If can’t do the crime. You get your knowledge of law from movies. All you need to do, is join us who live in the present world. As many TH-cam videos showing innocent victims being brutalized my tyrants in uniform, you have childlike view of the world.
Government officials should be held to a higher standard. Not only did they break the law, but they didn't do their job and violated their oath of office.
Here's the thing... the definition of "high crime" is the use of authority granted to you by virtue of your position in public service for the commission of a crime. High crimes are *supposed* to have a higher penalty, but, for some reason, none of their crimes are being prosecuted as a high crime.
What's crazy to me is the dude that stabbed my friend in the heart, on camera and with witnesses, was found guilty and sentenced to 30 days in county jail. 30 days for almost killing somebody. There is no such thing as a justice system in this country.
@hickoryst.6961 unfortunately yes really. That was in Cook County Illinois in 2009. If I recall correctly he had to pay $10,000 to bond out until his trial. He was charged with attempted murder, aggravated battery and some version of theft that I can't remember what they called it. At trial he even admitted to everything and said that he was stealing to pay for more heroin. He was found guilty and served a total of 30 days.
Wow, are they sure they weren't too tough on him. For attempted murder are they kidding with that ridiculous sentence?? He should be under the prison!!
As someone who does not live in the USA: Normally you always have such draconian penalties. But 4 months for $125,000 - that would be ridiculously low even in my country.
Key distinction: If a public official holds other public officials accountable, they risk being held accountable themselves. See the distinction? They're literally crafting a system where they can be less and less accountable to protect themselves by protecting their own.
He's pusing for a two tier justice system by saying neither needs to go to prison. They do!Both of them. I'm sick of people that wear a suit committing crimes and they even get a special name "white collar criminals". They are liars and thieves. They committed crimes nd should be locked up. His client stole $125,000 and only gave back $35,000 and he thinks she should just skip away.
Is it really that simple? Is that all it takes? Some loser merely has to say that someone is getting some advantage over you and you folks go mindlessly off the rails? OR, is that merely the excuse you employ to fein grievance, all the while knowing that is utter garbage. The problem is that this country has a record that has existed for hundreds of years proving the advantage in reverse. Whiners. Such garbage.
100% He's pushing bullshi+. It's a 3 tear justice system that he's lying about to convince others that this is a 2-tier justice system. It's effective when used and he knows it. Be certain that he's not giving you all the details of the case either. He lost his case, got no money and a loss on his record. Boohooo
She only gets 4 months from stealing more than $125,000 4 months isn't long enough. The defense lawyer doesn't think anyone should go to prison or jail.
Clearly, there is a double standard in justice. Money equals better lawyers and that is hard to debate. A Judge waylaying an office person with a stiff sentence is easier than a Judge harshly sentencing a big shot.
You may be right about the money aspect, but in this case, Mosby was declared indigent and given a free lawyer. Mosby got 12 months of home confinement, 100 hours of community service and three years of supervised release. Thats not an easy sentence at all. And she didn’t steal over $125,000. It was for perjury and mortgage fraud. Also, this guy isn’t a lawyer at all.
Do you know these 2 cases or are you just taking his word for it. These 2 cases are extremely different and are not anywhere near one anothers crimes. The first woman stole $125k from her employeer... got caught red handed and had to plead guilty (otherwise she's have denied it)... she got a light sentence in respect to her crime... 4 months in a Federal prison is a slap on the wrist for this level of crime. Marilyn Mosbey lied about her finiancial situation in order to draw $5k from her own retirement fund not stealing from anyone accept herself. Yes, she committed a crime by lying to access her funds before she should and deserved her punishment, but her sentence fit her crime as well. But by no means did the courts favor her over a woman that is truly a theif and deserved what she got. he's just pissed off that he lost his case.
Marilyn Mosby had a public defender. Her life has been ruined by this. So actually, his client got a better deal based on the crime committed. Who has the ability to pay back $35 k after being convicted and not being able to work anywhere?
I'd LOVE to see more local judges/attorneys give their opinion like this. It's to the point we all know we're being sold a bag of sh*t, but not all of us have the legit credentials to say something about it, worth listening to... Kudos to this guy.
Maybe not. He never said who the employer was. If it was a company that is supposed to be receiving money to help the people. Then they should get the same. if its a private company like an oil company or one that over charges for its services. Not so much.
Y'all don't do any research before dick riding, do you? Is embezzling 125,000 the same thing as putting inaccurate information on a mortgage application? No. Of course not. No person with more than two brain cells would make that argument.....
Accountable??? 57 Million government (retired and current) union/pension workers add NOTHING to IRS income revenue. Public vs Private. That's the swamp...
@Dynamice1337 yes, committed mortgage fraud, lied under oath. She was an officer of the court, responsible for prosecuting criminal acts. Perjury is a criminal act and she should have received the maximum sentence. Do we hold and police and prosecutors accountable? Do we hold them to a higher standard?
You are ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. MORE DA'S & JUDGES NEED TO BE DISBARRED FOR NOT FOLLOWING THE LAW & THEIR OATH THEY TOOK WHEN THEY TOOK OFFICE YOU CANNOT HAVE A DUAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN OUR COUNTRY. EVERY SINGLE PERSON MUST BE GIVEN DUE PROCESS AND A FAIR & HONEST TRIAL.
The lawyer in this video wants you to believe that the two cases were for the same crime... but he doesn't actually say this because it isn't true. His client was convicted of stealing $125,000 from her employer. Mosby was convicted of lying on the paperwork she submitted to take an early withdrawal of her own retirement funds during the pandemic (when there were special considerations for this kind of withdrawal.) She didn't steal anything from anyone. So yes... the two sentences were completely different because the two crimes were completely different. Keep in mind, the guy in the video is a lawyer so he's going to state facts in a way that leads you to draw conclusions that aren't really there.
Two completely diff cases. 1 stole 125k and got 4 months the other stole 5k from her own retirement account lol and got 12 months home confinement. Tell us your a internet simp for whatever comes into your brain without telling us @pd5640 & @aFineLineA
@@jessicastevens538 ... Stole money from herself? Right, I'm with you. But that wasn't even what she was tried for, she was tried for perjury, for lying about where the money came from. She paid dearly, lost the condo she bought, lost her money, lost her job, emotional torment, etc... all for getting her own money from a 401k. Who did she hurt?
Because he had common sense? It was HER money. This woman was attacked because she held police officers accountable for the brutal murder of Freddie Gray! Truly political! Rethugs vowed to get her and all they could come up with is that she lied to get her own money out of her 401k plan.
I know of a Hennepin County employee who embezzled $100K from the county (where Minneapolis, MN is in) who got no jail and did not even lose her job!?!? She blew the money at an Indian casino.
You have it backwards. The $125K thief WAS sent to prison for 4 years. The prosecutor was only caught not being untruthful under oath. Huge difference. Justice WAS done and this moron's comparison is bogus.
Trump said he wants the DEATH PENALTY for drug dealers!! He says that in his campaign speeches while he’s got rap musicians who have just been released from prison for dealing drugs on stage and in the crowd supporting him. And the lyrics in their songs are about doing drugs. Plus, it’s a well known fact that HE does drugs and his white house health care team dealt pills out to his team left and right when he lived there.
@@AvalonDreamz Trump said he wants the DEAT.H PENALTY for drug dealers!! He said it a campaign speech while he had rap musicians who had just been released from prison for dealing drugs on stage with him and ex-prisoner supporters in the crowd! And the rapper’s lyrics in their songs are about doing drugs. Plus, it's a well known fact that HE does drugs and his white house health care team dealt pills out all willy nilly to the staff when he was in office.
@@AvalonDreamz Trump wants the D3AT.H PENALTY for drug dealers!! He said that in a campaign speech while he had rap musicians who had just been released from prison for dealing drugs on stage with him and ex-prisoner supporters in the crowd! And the rapper’s lyrics in their songs are about doing drugs. Plus, it's a well known fact that HE does drugs and his white house health care team dealt pills out all willy nilly to the staff when he was in office.
@@AvalonDreamz Trump wants the DTH PENALTY for drug dealers!! He said that in a campaign speech while he had rap musicians who had just been released from prison for dealing drugs on stage with him and ex-prisoner supporters in the crowd! And the rapper’s lyrics in their songs are about doing drugs. Plus, it's a well known fact that HE does drugs and his white house health care team dealt pills out all willy nilly to the staff when he was in office.
You'd think but it doesn't work that way. They create the laws that protect them, goes against the civilians. Take hunter for example. Many videos of blacks being arrested as they video, they get 10+yrs. Hunter gets away with it because of hid dad. Government laws over rule civilian laws
So a public official who gets a speeding ticket should get 100x the fine as anyone else? That makes so much sense. You're why Trump loves the poorly educated.
Los Angeles spent 20 million over 5 years to help fix homelessness. What asked via a FOIA request by auditors, they can’t account for where it went. This kind of abuse has to stop
It's injustice, not justice we want to see changed. Government officials who use their authority from the people to make unconstitutional actions must be given a quick trial and a firm sentence.
No I think he gets the point. This TH-camr doesn't think people that steal should be sent to prison. If you steal 125K just a four months is a slap on the wrist. His idea that both her and the prosecutor should get NO jail time is silly. The fact the prosecutor got no jail time is blatant corruption in the system.
@@j-note3285the point he DIDN’T MISS, is this lawyer saying they both didn’t need to be in jail. Which is absurd. Steal $200 from Walmart and you go to jail . Steal $125,000, and no jail? And only pay back $35,000???
He makes a great point. That prosecutor should of got 3x's that in real prison not home arrest. For 12 months. She's the one who should have got the example out. She was a prosecutor for christ sake
You’re right I don’t think the prosecutor should go to prison either. I think she should be charged with treason as a public official taking advantage of the citizenry.
Do you know anything about her case????? She didn't steal public money. She was charged with taking her own money out of her retirement to buy a house. Not sure how that's a crime.
@@speedracertv4934 I certainly didn't know that..I only listened to the gentleman speaking. I only believe the corrupt should be held accountable. I have no pre judgements about the woman in question. I agreed with him on a different level.
This lady only plead guilty because they had conclusive proof she embezzled (accounting doesn't lie) and if she denied it, a jury would have convicted her and judge sentenced her to years in prison. She took a plea deal to get less time.
Key distinction: If a public official holds other public officials accountable, they risk being held accountable themselves. See the distinction? They're literally crafting a system where they can be less and less accountable to protect themselves by protecting their own.
@@justincoats7236 so they deserve to be a burden on taxpayers for something nonviolent? The vast majority of non violent crimes have no business having prison time attached to them. It’s a burden on the system, it institutionalizes people, it turns people into violent criminals, and most importantly it’s not effective in rehabilitating them. The purpose of the legal system should be rehabilitation, not simply incarceration. Incarceration should only be reserved for those who pose an immediate physical threat to their community. All other crimes should be treated in ways which encourage the guilty party to learn and change their behavior. Prison doesn’t do that, and if you say it does then that shows you have done 0 research on the topic.
@@0psec_not_goodThe argument of "imprisonment is too burdensome on the tax payer" is a poor excuse for its exchange at the cost of enacting a system of justice at all.
It would take most people years of their life to save up that much money, so it’s not a petty crime. Putting such a thief in prison is not right, because the thief should be paying back the money plus punitive damages, and they can’t do that if they’re locked up in prison. Restitution needs to be the primary punishment for thieves.
@@ethanlamoureux5306 they never will, so the only restitution is making an example out of them because as we’ve seen, you go soft on crime, crime increases.
how can you have any justice while it is blind? That's the joke... here... everyone wanting a "blind justice system" and getting upset when it misses a lot. To have justice... it must not be blind at all. It must be aware of all things... which is impossible for us... but not impossible for God. This is why judgement must be with Faith, Mercy, and Justice... missing any of those 3 and your judgement is wrong. And since this nation hates God with a passion... there is not faith in judgements... since this nation loves corruption, there is no justice... and this this judge wanted to make an example out of this woman... there is no mercy. If this judge does not repent... God is going to say the same thing to them... "I must make an example out of you". God WILL judge you the exact same as you judge others. There is a reason most people are not going to be saved and only a "few" will be.
@@CD-vb9fi you've totally misrepresented what blind justice is. Blind justice means the court isn't supposed to judge the defendant by anything other than the facts. The court is not supposed to see color, sex, religion, politics, age, or wealth as a factor in deciding guilt. How old are you? Do you know anything about the justice system?
You think that person is somehow a danger to those in the general population? What about embezzlement implies violence? The justice system should not just be a form of legalized revenge. That wouldn't be justice.
@@asheylarry8213 No one said it makes it right. Study after study shows us that the threat of prison time does not deter crime at all. Not even the death penalty deters crime. It doesn't help the victim, it doesnt help society, it unnecessarily takes up resources, and it encourages recidivism. Even your phrasing shows the real reason people want to associate jail time with all manner of criminal activity. It has nothing to do with removing people who may be a threat to society, and everything to do with revenge.
@@asheylarry8213I think the point he’s making, is that they aren’t a threat to public safety so there’s no need to lock them up. Instead, make them pay everything back even if it means making those same people live like roaches until it’s done. Otherwise, the taxpayer is paying for an all expenses-paid vacation for the person who initially robbed them to begin with.
100% right. Prison shouldn't be used as a catch-all punishment. There are reasons to be sent to prison: when you absolutely need to be removed from society.
No, it's a deterrent to doing the crime. Imagine if that lady who stole the $125,000 just got home confinement? She could work remotely from her home(make $$$), have friends or pay delivery services to get her groceries and booze...even have home parties with booze at her home. Not much of an deterrent to stealing large amounts of money...I'm guessing she'd be back at it at another company in no time at all. As opposite to having to go to jail, give up your freedom, and the embarrassment that you now have to tell people you went to jail...YES, that would be a deterrent, for most people!
@@bettywith2girls exactly, if she has house arrest she should also be forced to be on 12 hr restitution work force 6 days a week. On side of highways cleaning garbage, in inner cities removing graffiti, trash, feeding the homeless, cutting grass of public spaces and vacant properties. She can be home to eat sleep and shower.
@@bettywith2girls You may be right in this case, but, if incarceration is such a great deterrent, then why are recidivism rates (return to custody over a specified period of time after release) as high as they are?
@@srbaruchi -- Prison is a graduate school in crime. Yeah, a lot of the people there got caught doing something, but they share their tips and tricks with the newer prisoners, and they teach them how and why they got caught.
Wrong. They BOTH go to jail. The embezzler should pay back every cents they took, and the “prosecutor” should do those 12 months in jail. THAT is deterrent.
"Supposedly" blindfolded. The People no longer have the power to "ensure" she stays that way, because we have very lazy, downright PATHETIC citizens that don't take their duty in voting seriously! Leaving us with the massively corrupt systems from local to federal level...
@@kevcwmsThat's not what embezzlement means... genius. She stole money at work. Now she'll do a few months, pay back a pittance, and ghost the people that trusted her out of almost $100k. But yeah, it was hers. Obviously.
@@ChironetaMaxima It has become clear to me that you don't actually understand the issue being discussed. Thus, it is unfortunate that you are so willing to so haphazardly jump into it. As I generally don't engage in open-source media to draw battle lines, and certainly not with anyone who very clearly employs a ready-fire-aim approach to discourse, I will leave you to your puerile confusion. Additionally, if you had any idea of what you were trying to address, then you'd understand that embezzlement was not an actual part of this. However, so much for that. Meant no harm.
@ChironetaMaxima Hello, Yesterday I responded to your comment on this video post, when I clearly didn't have to. I recognize that I was being reactive, not thoughtful. Please accept my apology for my harsh response. Thank you.
The judge's job is to EXECUTE JUSTICE, not "make an example to others". It is called a "justice system", not a "deterrence system" or an "example to others" system.
Well yes, but the application of such is a constantly moving standard of law, and why laws are passed and exist. Regardless if the endless opinions you or I may hold about the application, the founding principle of equal, equitable, and fair treatment us present in all descriptions and definitions. So, my personal belief about this is deterrence is an important or necessary part in the equation. If there is no deterrent component in punishment for breaking the law, it is a quick step to believe there will be more crime; otherwise you are simply punishing. And if you are only punishing then it is purely vindictive action. At the minimum, everybody should have the exact same same treatment by justice regardless of office, wealth, influence, etc. That is not just in sentencing and what not, but in the entire treatment of someone from investigation, arrest, and trial of hearings.
@@paulsweeney2959I would like to enhance your example. Rich people getting a $450 ticket for misusing a carpool lane to get home vs a low wage earner misusing the carpool lane getting that same ticket trying to get to work.
Imagine being convicted of 34 felonies while having 4 other court cases pending for additional criminal activity and still being able to run for president. 😂
Imagine having tons of trumped up charges pushed against you for 9 years because our political opposition fears you so is trying to throw evverything they can think of to stop you. Makes me feel like we're in the USSR.
They should both go to prison for at least a year. They should be made an example of. The amount of crime that is just looked over and even accepted as normal practice is harmful and destructive to society now and in the future it will just become worse until we stop accepting it.
We already know that it's a corrupt system. But what can we do to stop and also fix the problem ? The only hope we have is with people like you who are bringing this to everyone's attention. Tell us what we really need to do in order to stop this madness.
@@JCPenny-il8rd... You're absolutely right!! The prosecutor took money from her OWN retirement plan. It was HER money, she didn't steal from anyone. The shame is in the fact that retirement plans are allowed to hold people's money hostage when they need it and they feel forced to try to get around the stupid rules just to get THEIR OWN money.
Putting a prosecutor in prison with criminals they prosecuted doesn't sound very safe. Same thing goes for putting cops in prison. Solitary confinement for an entire year could be contested as "cruel and unusual punishment" - thus home confinement.
White collar crime should be punished but they do not represent a danger to society the same as someone who holds a gun to your head taking your money. I would prefer a lower level prison with work release until complete restitution (punitive damages included) are made.
NAW EPH THAT!!! Needs to be equal!!! Historically we people of color have complained about the system and rightly so… the man in this video spoke of a woman who STOLE $120K and only served 4months?!? WTF!!!! Meanwhile in the hood we have people going away for a decade for robbing a few hundred or a couple thousand $$ from 7Eleven or Stealing Cars AND THEY SHOULD GO TO JAIL but please keep the same energy with these “white collar crimes!!” Because stealing a $30K Toyota is way less than stealing $120K!! Two Tiers For Sure!!
@@dalmac5978 Exactly. After appeals filed & resolved, then proper sentencing should be applied. Too many "white collar" criminals get little or no prison time.
I agree those who hold public office and take an oath should be held to a higher standard.
I'd be happy if they were just held to the same standard.
Exactly. Under color of authority should be a multiplicatory factor in sentencing. I’d say multiply punishment by somewhere between two and five.
Amen, but will never happen because there is no consequences for being a liar and thief.
At bare minimum, the same standard
You mean like Trump? Mosby didn't embezzle or hurt anyone. It was just shady behavior. Your embezzler did actual harm to someone.
It's time we stop allowing our elected officials get away with breaking the law.
Never going to happen, they write the laws and pillow talk about legislation isn't illegal. I'm talking about stock market purchases. A few years ago some politicians went outside, made a phone call and I never heard about anything happened to them. They are untouchable unless they piss people off.
Yes starting with Mr. T.!🎉🎉🎉
Amen 🙏🏻
Stop praying for it and make it happen. Vote for people to uphold the law. Don't vote vote for people who scream it's someone else's fault.
Who's in the "Club!" The commies protect each other and go after their adversaries! Like TRUMP!
Those who serve "We The People" must be held accountable.
Don’t forget trump doesn’t count because he never swore an oath to the constitution!
-This was (and likely still will be) his actual defence in one of his Insurrection “inquiries”.
That's an illusion you accepted as truth.
We're cattle, they are the people.
" we the people" are the ones that put them in power in the first place .... somone needs to hold " we the people" accountable for the garbage goverment they keep electing.
They only serve themselves! How hasn’t anyone figured this out by now? Doesn’t matter which side they’re all the same
But the prosecutor was Blk & the judge was Blk so....she gets a pass......any questions?
You are a BRAVE PERSON.
I'm impressed and agree.
Let's vote for this Man
Time to hold the judges and courts accountable for not holding rich and famous accountable.
The orange idiot did just get held accountable to an extent but he was treated with velvet gloves. Anyone else committing contempt that many times would be locked up at least once for 24 hours
Be realistic - who is gonna do that? Me? You?
start with trump and biden
We as Americans are to fat, lazy, and brainwashed to do anything, other than complain about it on TH-cam...its to late
@@donaldcarpenter5328Trump?
This is exactly what annoys me. Trump is the most investigated person on the planet and the Democrats had to twist the law to get him. They looked at any which way. Is that what you are advocating for?
I thought it's about investigating a crime and find the guilty. Not investigate someone until you find a crime.
People who hold public office should be held to a higher standard not a lower standard.
Not even an equal standard!
One stole 100k from an employer, the other was convicted of perjury... the sentences fit the crimes
Tell that to Trump and his cult. Lol
No, everyone should be held to the SAME standard. That is the whole point.
No. The same standard!
BRILLIANTLY SAID. The justice system is a shame.
naw.... they Both deserve Prison!!!
. . . is a SHAM
The sad part, as lead prosecutor for Maryland she was the justice system.
It's just-us, not justice
Everyone in this country knows the judicial system treats people differently.
Because she has extra privileges and protection, and the opportunity to defraud the very people that elected her, and she committed the theft publicly and willingly.
I WOULD RECOMMEND SHE AND THE JUDGE GET THE FIRING SQUAD !!
Very powerful sir. It reinforces, "It's not WHAT you know, it's WHO you know."
Who you know & how well they like you
True in politics. Saw a lot of this with prosecutors and judges in Trump‘s trail. They were also going after Trump with a vengeance and they wanted to see him hang so they lied and lied.
The military saying is "it's not what you know, it's who you blow".
@@alexanderblackburn4520 My husband used to say this. I never knew where he picked it up. I should have guessed.
*whom
The UGLY truth. There is a two tier system of justice.
You have no idea what Moseby was convicted of. lol
Yes it's 2 tiered, the better your lawyer the more justice you receive. The poor get the shaft while the rich get a golden get out of jail free ticket.
@@adonis8289 So do we accept the status quo or demand equal justice?
@@victorcaceres9603 it's America, you get the justice you can afford. My advice, don't do the crime if you can't do the time. The lawyer in the short compares 2 cases that are totally different. One involved grand theft and the other perjury. 4 months was a gift, she should have gotten at least a year.
@@adonis8289 What a simplistic statement. If can’t do the crime. You get your knowledge of law from movies.
All you need to do, is join us who live in the present world. As many TH-cam videos showing innocent victims being brutalized my tyrants in uniform, you have childlike view of the world.
Government officials should be held to a higher standard. Not only did they break the law, but they didn't do their job and violated their oath of office.
Including ex-presidents.
Especially former presidents
@@jeffreyodien5575 He was still the President when he attempted election fraud. That should block him from ever holding offer period.
Here's the thing... the definition of "high crime" is the use of authority granted to you by virtue of your position in public service for the commission of a crime. High crimes are *supposed* to have a higher penalty, but, for some reason, none of their crimes are being prosecuted as a high crime.
Same standard. Never less.
100% agree. Double standards all day long. 🤬
Judges , too, must be accountable. Justice for all Americans.
Impeach Clarence Thomas
I've never heard of a person getting a fair trial when the judge is corrupt
The color of Justice is green
That prosecutor knew the judge "very well!" 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🎉
@@dalmac5978
What's crazy to me is the dude that stabbed my friend in the heart, on camera and with witnesses, was found guilty and sentenced to 30 days in county jail. 30 days for almost killing somebody. There is no such thing as a justice system in this country.
@hickoryst.6961 unfortunately yes really. That was in Cook County Illinois in 2009. If I recall correctly he had to pay $10,000 to bond out until his trial. He was charged with attempted murder, aggravated battery and some version of theft that I can't remember what they called it. At trial he even admitted to everything and said that he was stealing to pay for more heroin. He was found guilty and served a total of 30 days.
Wow, are they sure they weren't too tough on him.
For attempted murder are they kidding with that ridiculous sentence?? He should be under the prison!!
Protected class?
@@dennisrounds1996 I can tell you that he was a white dude if that's what you mean?
@@dennisrounds1996Ah, yes! So he was in a protected class, just not the one that you are implying.
Johnny Cochran said it best
"The color of justice in this country is green".
OJ had lots of green, so he got away with double murder
from a man who profited greatly from it.
To a man who helped a Millionaire murderer wife beater get off & evade his Civil judgement to boot!
Any 500/hr lawyer what the color or justice it
Except if your name is Trump.
BRAVO. BRAVE MAN TELLING THE TRUTH. GOD BLESS YOU.
Corrupt judges don't want to make an example about corruption.
🎯
Because they know at some point they themselves might be standing in front of a judge 😂
Send the prosecutor away for 10 years to send a very strong message! The prosecutor abused her position and deserves to be held accountable.
and trump should get 20 years
@@KarmicSalt dork
@KarmicSalt
You love Trump? You're obsessed obviously 🙄 🤪.
Haha cuz You're the one who brought him up, Groomer
@@KarmicSalthe’s living in your head rent free 😂😂😂
Send the judge to prison. Pretty sure the judge is a Democrat and in cohoots with the state prosecutor.
Embezzled $125k, paid back $35k, went to prison for 4 months...so she made $90k in 4 months
tax free
Yes, I agree. Both cases are a lack of justice.
lol. The 35k was probably from what she stole that wasn’t accounted for. Who knows what she stole that they didn’t know. Or dug down far enough to see
As someone who does not live in the USA: Normally you always have such draconian penalties. But 4 months for $125,000 - that would be ridiculously low even in my country.
...sentence to 35000 $ AND the money back. = 160000
An old saying comes to mind when I hear this story: What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
100% Government and law enforcement should be held to a higher standard as they made an oath to the public
Including ex presidents
Totally agreed!!!
Key distinction: If a public official holds other public officials accountable, they risk being held accountable themselves. See the distinction?
They're literally crafting a system where they can be less and less accountable to protect themselves by protecting their own.
Absolutely
Their Oath is not to the people.
Their Oath is to the Constitution of the United States and for state officials their states respective Constitution.
Officer of the court committing crimes should be a sentencing enhancement with mandatory minimums
Yes, mandatory minimums.
Thanks for confirming we have a two-tier system of justice.
He's pusing for a two tier justice system by saying neither needs to go to prison. They do!Both of them. I'm sick of people that wear a suit committing crimes and they even get a special name "white collar criminals". They are liars and thieves. They committed crimes nd should be locked up. His client stole $125,000 and only gave back $35,000 and he thinks she should just skip away.
One for rich white people, one for powerful white people. That covers everybody, doesn't it?
Is it really that simple? Is that all it takes? Some loser merely has to say that someone is getting some advantage over you and you folks go mindlessly off the rails? OR, is that merely the excuse you employ to fein grievance, all the while knowing that is utter garbage. The problem is that this country has a record that has existed for hundreds of years proving the advantage in reverse. Whiners. Such garbage.
100% He's pushing bullshi+. It's a 3 tear justice system that he's lying about to convince others that this is a 2-tier justice system. It's effective when used and he knows it.
Be certain that he's not giving you all the details of the case either.
He lost his case, got no money and a loss on his record. Boohooo
The Republican party: thieves and middlemen
They should both go to prison. Period.
She only gets 4 months from stealing more than $125,000
4 months isn't long enough.
The defense lawyer doesn't think anyone should go to prison or jail.
Clearly, there is a double standard in justice. Money equals better lawyers and that is hard to debate. A Judge waylaying an office person with a stiff sentence is easier than a Judge harshly sentencing a big shot.
You may be right about the money aspect, but in this case, Mosby was declared indigent and given a free lawyer. Mosby got 12 months of home confinement, 100 hours of community service and three years of supervised release. Thats not an easy sentence at all. And she didn’t steal over $125,000. It was for perjury and mortgage fraud. Also, this guy isn’t a lawyer at all.
Do you know these 2 cases or are you just taking his word for it. These 2 cases are extremely different and are not anywhere near one anothers crimes. The first woman stole $125k from her employeer... got caught red handed and had to plead guilty (otherwise she's have denied it)... she got a light sentence in respect to her crime... 4 months in a Federal prison is a slap on the wrist for this level of crime.
Marilyn Mosbey lied about her finiancial situation in order to draw $5k from her own retirement fund not stealing from anyone accept herself. Yes, she committed a crime by lying to access her funds before she should and deserved her punishment, but her sentence fit her crime as well. But by no means did the courts favor her over a woman that is truly a theif and deserved what she got. he's just pissed off that he lost his case.
Marilyn Mosby had a public defender. Her life has been ruined by this. So actually, his client got a better deal based on the crime committed. Who has the ability to pay back $35 k after being convicted and not being able to work anywhere?
Double standards is ALL this current disadministration knows, we’re now a Hillary Marxist nation per the 2020 Diselection.
Come on, let's be honest. This had nothing g to do with what lawyer she could afford to hire.
I’ve been saying for years, those who make or enforce laws should be held to a higher standard for breaking the same laws.
Preach. Public servants charged with enforcing and upholding the law should get harsher sentences, not lighter ones.
To be fair while in office Mosby didn't enforce nor upheld the law.
Facts!!!
@@vegeta6555 point is, she took an OATH.. so punishment should be TWICE as severe.
I'd LOVE to see more local judges/attorneys give their opinion like this. It's to the point we all know we're being sold a bag of sh*t, but not all of us have the legit credentials to say something about it, worth listening to... Kudos to this guy.
They both deserve punishment.
The official deserves more.
So Trump deserve to be exonerated
@@ivancampbell8123no the traitors Trump should be sent to Russia. Even his first wife is accusing him of r@pe!
Maybe not. He never said who the employer was. If it was a company that is supposed to be receiving money to help the people. Then they should get the same. if its a private company like an oil company or one that over charges for its services. Not so much.
@@ivancampbell8123 No, Trump should go to prison. Try and keep up.
@@ivancampbell8123 They should all be in prison, son, or do you think only the poor should serve time for their crimes?
Exactly! We need to hold our elected officials accountable.
Gee I wonder how much The Trump will get compared to Mostly full of Bes?
Y'all don't do any research before dick riding, do you?
Is embezzling 125,000 the same thing as putting inaccurate information on a mortgage application? No. Of course not. No person with more than two brain cells would make that argument.....
Accountable???
57 Million government (retired and current) union/pension workers add NOTHING to IRS income revenue. Public vs Private.
That's the swamp...
NO!!!! Read the Mosby case. It was a statement about a $5,000 payment for a mortgage application. BIG DIFFERENCE.
@@jefft5152 seriously. This is just an example of a lawyer making a terrible comparison in order to conflate two completely different crimes
I agree! Ordinary people sentence to prison. The former State Prosecutor of Maryland should go to prison
What was their name.
Facts!!!
@@AFineLineA Not facts. Opinion. Learn the difference.
My head is exploding from all of this hypocrisy! The law is the law!!! It’s the same for all!!!
AND these criminal government employees still get to keep their pensions! 😡
And by the looks raises!!!
And apparently, secret service protection
No she won't
And was paid to do a bad job on she job!
That needs to be changed. All payments should be terminated. Where's the common sense!
As a prosecutor she absolutely should have been in prison
Do you even know what she did?
what's a prosecutet?
@@EcoCentrist prosecutor, so sorry for the typo.
@Dynamice1337 yes, committed mortgage fraud, lied under oath. She was an officer of the court, responsible for prosecuting criminal acts. Perjury is a criminal act and she should have received the maximum sentence. Do we hold and police and prosecutors accountable? Do we hold them to a higher standard?
Is she a Democrat? That's the important thing.
I'm always entertained at the convoluted reasoning of our judges
You are ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. MORE DA'S & JUDGES NEED TO BE DISBARRED FOR NOT FOLLOWING THE LAW & THEIR OATH THEY TOOK WHEN THEY TOOK OFFICE
YOU CANNOT HAVE A DUAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN OUR COUNTRY. EVERY SINGLE PERSON MUST BE GIVEN DUE PROCESS AND A FAIR & HONEST TRIAL.
Those who enforce the law, often selectively, should be held to DOUBLE the punishment of anyone else.
Absolutely correct. Home confinement? Man who's that judge?
Someone who plays golf with someone.
A dumbocrat of course. like who were The Trump jurors in NY, yep.
The lawyer in this video wants you to believe that the two cases were for the same crime... but he doesn't actually say this because it isn't true.
His client was convicted of stealing $125,000 from her employer.
Mosby was convicted of lying on the paperwork she submitted to take an early withdrawal of her own retirement funds during the pandemic (when there were special considerations for this kind of withdrawal.) She didn't steal anything from anyone.
So yes... the two sentences were completely different because the two crimes were completely different. Keep in mind, the guy in the video is a lawyer so he's going to state facts in a way that leads you to draw conclusions that aren't really there.
Exactly!! That judge should be removed!
1000% agreed!!!
Two completely diff cases. 1 stole 125k and got 4 months the other stole 5k from her own retirement account lol and got 12 months home confinement. Tell us your a internet simp for whatever comes into your brain without telling us @pd5640 & @aFineLineA
@@jessicastevens538 ... Stole money from herself? Right, I'm with you. But that wasn't even what she was tried for, she was tried for perjury, for lying about where the money came from. She paid dearly, lost the condo she bought, lost her money, lost her job, emotional torment, etc... all for getting her own money from a 401k. Who did she hurt?
Because he had common sense? It was HER money. This woman was attacked because she held police officers accountable for the brutal murder of Freddie Gray! Truly political! Rethugs vowed to get her and all they could come up with is that she lied to get her own money out of her 401k plan.
@@jessicastevens538 see your psychiatrist, your medications are not working.
This is the type of American Citizens I like their ideas very much;!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Stealing $90k should get you some jail time.
Fani Willis? Georgia
Out of her own retirement account, because that's where the money came from.
@@valeriej.chapin4553
Your comment has a "translate to English" tag on it. Perhaps because you're from Mars and are an alien.
I read about a man given life without parole for stealing a slice of pizza. Look it up!
@@DonariaRegiaCalifornia Three Strikes?
I agree with you 100%! The scale of justice needs to be calibrated.
If any common citizen embezzled over $100.000 they would be in prison. Let's have some true justice for a change.
I know of a Hennepin County employee who embezzled $100K from the county (where Minneapolis, MN is in) who got no jail and did not even lose her job!?!? She blew the money at an Indian casino.
YES. Justice needs to be blind. 😎
@@guyfawkesuThe1
Be the casino.
You have it backwards. The $125K thief WAS sent to prison for 4 years. The prosecutor was only caught not being untruthful under oath. Huge difference. Justice WAS done and this moron's comparison is bogus.
@@Grrrnthumb Ass hat. She never went to jail and kept her job!
As someone who's been around the system for 40 years shout it from the rooftops man ❤
Funny how people dismiss these white collar crimes but want a person with a rock of crack in prison for life.
Yeah that was Joe Bidens doing.
Trump said he wants the DEATH PENALTY for drug dealers!!
He says that in his campaign speeches while he’s got rap musicians who have just been released from prison for dealing drugs on stage and in the crowd supporting him. And the lyrics in their songs are about doing drugs.
Plus, it’s a well known fact that HE does drugs and his white house health care team dealt pills out to his team left and right when he lived there.
@@AvalonDreamz Trump said he wants the DEAT.H PENALTY for drug dealers!!
He said it a campaign speech while he had rap musicians who had just been released from prison for dealing drugs on stage with him and ex-prisoner supporters in the crowd! And the rapper’s lyrics in their songs are about doing drugs.
Plus, it's a well known fact that HE does drugs and his white house health care team dealt pills out all willy nilly to the staff when he was in office.
@@AvalonDreamz Trump wants the D3AT.H PENALTY for drug dealers!!
He said that in a campaign speech while he had rap musicians who had just been released from prison for dealing drugs on stage with him and ex-prisoner supporters in the crowd! And the rapper’s lyrics in their songs are about doing drugs.
Plus, it's a well known fact that HE does drugs and his white house health care team dealt pills out all willy nilly to the staff when he was in office.
@@AvalonDreamz Trump wants the DTH PENALTY for drug dealers!!
He said that in a campaign speech while he had rap musicians who had just been released from prison for dealing drugs on stage with him and ex-prisoner supporters in the crowd! And the rapper’s lyrics in their songs are about doing drugs.
Plus, it's a well known fact that HE does drugs and his white house health care team dealt pills out all willy nilly to the staff when he was in office.
Obviously the prosecutor had dirt on the Judge.
Penalties for political officers who violate the law should be 100 times more severe.
You'd think but it doesn't work that way. They create the laws that protect them, goes against the civilians. Take hunter for example. Many videos of blacks being arrested as they video, they get 10+yrs. Hunter gets away with it because of hid dad. Government laws over rule civilian laws
@@dennisrosso6175 yeah just keep your head buried in the sand, trumpster
@dennisrosso6175 You're living proof why Trump loves the poorly educated.
So a public official who gets a speeding ticket should get 100x the fine as anyone else? That makes so much sense. You're why Trump loves the poorly educated.
@@curtrapp5291
If you were smart you'd know the judge najes the final decision regardless. System is corrupt on its own being runned by democrats.
Los Angeles spent 20 million over 5 years to help fix homelessness. What asked via a FOIA request by auditors, they can’t account for where it went. This kind of abuse has to stop
It's injustice, not justice we want to see changed. Government officials who use their authority from the people to make unconstitutional actions must be given a quick trial and a firm sentence.
Apologies should have zero bearing on the justice system. It's a direct punishment for people who are wrongly convicted and maintain their innocents.
They both should get 12 months of jail time.
More.
Minimum
Right ! Absolutely ridiculous!
Public servants should be held to a higher standard even than regular citizens... Period
So many private individual crimes with by far much greater impact to community as a whole. Bizarre how many can’t see their own hypocrisy.
Trump. For. Prison.
Embezzled $125k from her employer? She should absolutely be in federal prison.
I think you missed the point.
@@j-note3285they both should go
No I think he gets the point. This TH-camr doesn't think people that steal should be sent to prison. If you steal 125K just a four months is a slap on the wrist. His idea that both her and the prosecutor should get NO jail time is silly. The fact the prosecutor got no jail time is blatant corruption in the system.
@@aebalc He didnt say "no jail time" he said "no Federal prison".
@@hoghogwild How is what I said substantively different? Four months is still a minor sentence.
The person that had a higher responsibility should have been sentenced to a higher bar to deter others from abusing our civic system.
thank you for standing up for reason.
They absolutely BOTH deserve to go to prison.
Waste of tax payer money.
Except only one of them did which is the point you missed.
@@j-note3285 I didn’t miss the point. The point he was trying to make was glaringly obvious.
@@lmknow7xyou wouldn’t feel that way if you were the one they embezzled money from.
@@j-note3285the point he DIDN’T MISS, is this lawyer saying they both didn’t need to be in jail. Which is absurd. Steal $200 from Walmart and you go to jail . Steal $125,000, and no jail? And only pay back $35,000???
To start off with crazy she only gets 4 months for stealing over 125k. Agree the prosecutor should also be held accountable.
White collar crime suffers for a lack of accountability in the US. They should both be seeing prison time.
He makes a great point. That prosecutor should of got 3x's that in real prison not home arrest. For 12 months. She's the one who should have got the example out. She was a prosecutor for christ sake
"If my representatives can do it, then why cant I?"
When the people are not given justice, it is time for the people to take justice into their own hands.
Absolutely on point !
You’re right I don’t think the prosecutor should go to prison either. I think she should be charged with treason as a public official taking advantage of the citizenry.
And what do you suppose should happen after being charged with treason?
Also never be hired for any kind of public office anywhere ever again in her life.
Do you know anything about her case????? She didn't steal public money. She was charged with taking her own money out of her retirement to buy a house. Not sure how that's a crime.
😂😂😂...sure she did../just like Dixon, Pugh and the rest of shitty Baltimore public service officials@@speedracertv4934
@@speedracertv4934 I certainly didn't know that..I only listened to the gentleman speaking. I only believe the corrupt should be held accountable. I have no pre judgements about the woman in question. I agreed with him on a different level.
"It's a big club and you're not in it" it's common knowledge how the ruling elites play by a different set of rules.
In other words, being honest and truthful will put you in jail.
Is that really what you take away from this story?
This lady only plead guilty because they had conclusive proof she embezzled (accounting doesn't lie) and if she denied it, a jury would have convicted her and judge sentenced her to years in prison. She took a plea deal to get less time.
Key distinction: If a public official holds other public officials accountable, they risk being held accountable themselves. See the distinction?
They're literally crafting a system where they can be less and less accountable to protect themselves by protecting their own.
The nation was shocked at the outcome of the O.J. trial and has been ever since.
A prosecutor's privilege is thinking stealing "just $125k" isn't a real crime worthy of prison. Prosecutors don't live by the rules of the common man.
I gave him a thumbs down because they both deserve to go to prison. His clients stole $125,000 and only said sorry because she was caught.
@@justincoats7236 so they deserve to be a burden on taxpayers for something nonviolent?
The vast majority of non violent crimes have no business having prison time attached to them. It’s a burden on the system, it institutionalizes people, it turns people into violent criminals, and most importantly it’s not effective in rehabilitating them. The purpose of the legal system should be rehabilitation, not simply incarceration. Incarceration should only be reserved for those who pose an immediate physical threat to their community. All other crimes should be treated in ways which encourage the guilty party to learn and change their behavior. Prison doesn’t do that, and if you say it does then that shows you have done 0 research on the topic.
@@0psec_not_goodThe argument of "imprisonment is too burdensome on the tax payer" is a poor excuse for its exchange at the cost of enacting a system of justice at all.
It would take most people years of their life to save up that much money, so it’s not a petty crime. Putting such a thief in prison is not right, because the thief should be paying back the money plus punitive damages, and they can’t do that if they’re locked up in prison. Restitution needs to be the primary punishment for thieves.
@@ethanlamoureux5306 they never will, so the only restitution is making an example out of them because as we’ve seen, you go soft on crime, crime increases.
That's why sentencing should be done by committee, not by just a single judge
That is a Great idea
Where do you think sentencing guidelines come from?😅
There is no justice, when justice isn't blind.
That’s right.
@@WhiteCollarAdviceOfficialNow compare that to a Walmart employee getting 9mo for stealing a $800 tv.
Justice has never been blind because it's always been run by those who can clearly see their biases.
how can you have any justice while it is blind? That's the joke... here... everyone wanting a "blind justice system" and getting upset when it misses a lot.
To have justice... it must not be blind at all. It must be aware of all things... which is impossible for us... but not impossible for God.
This is why judgement must be with Faith, Mercy, and Justice... missing any of those 3 and your judgement is wrong.
And since this nation hates God with a passion... there is not faith in judgements... since this nation loves corruption, there is no justice... and this this judge wanted to make an example out of this woman... there is no mercy.
If this judge does not repent... God is going to say the same thing to them... "I must make an example out of you".
God WILL judge you the exact same as you judge others. There is a reason most people are not going to be saved and only a "few" will be.
@@CD-vb9fi you've totally misrepresented what blind justice is. Blind justice means the court isn't supposed to judge the defendant by anything other than the facts. The court is not supposed to see color, sex, religion, politics, age, or wealth as a factor in deciding guilt.
How old are you? Do you know anything about the justice system?
So glad u r speaking out. She is so rude put her Mosby in prison what a fraud!
While a poor black man goes to Rikers for 800 days without a trial for allegedly ALLEGEDLY stealing a backpack.
WHAT???????? That’s almost 3 years!
Best deterrent: send the keepers of the Law to jail for all crimes. Sends a very strong message
Begin with with getting rid of "qualified immunity"!!!!!!!
This is the TRUE “2-tier system”. Not some politician whining when they get caught….
Millions must be held accountable
Waste of taxpayer money? for jailing someone who stole $125k from their employer? umm... that's what prison is for...
You think that person is somehow a danger to those in the general population? What about embezzlement implies violence? The justice system should not just be a form of legalized revenge. That wouldn't be justice.
@@aprotosis It's not a violent crime that doesn't make it right lol. 4 months for stealing nearly 90k from someone is a slap on the wrist.
@@asheylarry8213 No one said it makes it right. Study after study shows us that the threat of prison time does not deter crime at all. Not even the death penalty deters crime. It doesn't help the victim, it doesnt help society, it unnecessarily takes up resources, and it encourages recidivism. Even your phrasing shows the real reason people want to associate jail time with all manner of criminal activity. It has nothing to do with removing people who may be a threat to society, and everything to do with revenge.
@@asheylarry8213I think the point he’s making, is that they aren’t a threat to public safety so there’s no need to lock them up. Instead, make them pay everything back even if it means making those same people live like roaches until it’s done.
Otherwise, the taxpayer is paying for an all expenses-paid vacation for the person who initially robbed them to begin with.
@@noobie1890Bingo!
Absolutely correct. Entitled privileged individuals shouldn’t get treated differently than the rest of us.
Then why are we not charging Fake Electors?
Exactly! Public servants gone wrong need more severe penalties!
She had 2 little kids or she’d have likely gone.
Her bigger issue is she’ll presumably be disbarred
100% right. Prison shouldn't be used as a catch-all punishment. There are reasons to be sent to prison: when you absolutely need to be removed from society.
No, it's a deterrent to doing the crime. Imagine if that lady who stole the $125,000 just got home confinement? She could work remotely from her home(make $$$), have friends or pay delivery services to get her groceries and booze...even have home parties with booze at her home. Not much of an deterrent to stealing large amounts of money...I'm guessing she'd be back at it at another company in no time at all. As opposite to having to go to jail, give up your freedom, and the embarrassment that you now have to tell people you went to jail...YES, that would be a deterrent, for most people!
@@bettywith2girls exactly, if she has house arrest she should also be forced to be on 12 hr restitution work force 6 days a week. On side of highways cleaning garbage, in inner cities removing graffiti, trash, feeding the homeless, cutting grass of public spaces and vacant properties. She can be home to eat sleep and shower.
@@bettywith2girls You may be right in this case, but, if incarceration is such a great deterrent, then why are recidivism rates (return to custody over a specified period of time after release) as high as they are?
@@srbaruchi Because prisons no longer impose punishment in this country!
@@srbaruchi -- Prison is a graduate school in crime. Yeah, a lot of the people there got caught doing something, but they share their tips and tricks with the newer prisoners, and they teach them how and why they got caught.
Wrong. They BOTH go to jail. The embezzler should pay back every cents they took, and the “prosecutor” should do those 12 months in jail. THAT is deterrent.
So just the first one should pay back, but not the one in office? Just jail time?
What the f*ck is the deterrent for the POS prosecutor?
Either way both deserve jail time
We should hold the powerful accountable. Period.
From judge to judge there’s a huge difference in sentencing for the same crime. Our entire justice system needs a complete overhaul.
your client did deserve jail
There is a reason lady justice is blindfolded.
"Supposedly" blindfolded. The People no longer have the power to "ensure" she stays that way, because we have very lazy, downright PATHETIC citizens that don't take their duty in voting seriously! Leaving us with the massively corrupt systems from local to federal level...
That was a great great comeback. Kudos to you.
That was a freems0n gift to usa mas0ns, showing symbolism of relevance.
she's not blind in America anymore, she let's a lot of people with money walk the streets with impunity when people without money wind up in prison.
Yeah otherwise she woulda realized and saw the 350 years of slavery and the black lives it destroyed. . .
What bs that is. Both need prison time, they are felons !
Felon?/? It was her money!!! You can't steal your own money. Check the facts first...
She embezzled, did you not hear ? That is a big crime !
@@terrierose5917 She did NOT embezzle... STOP lying!!!
State prison first
I hope you feel the same way about Trump 34 times
Totally agree with you. It’s insulting to our justice system that your client goes to jail not the high profile official.
How can you agree? One stole somebody else's money and the other took their own money but lied.
Two totally different crimes. One lied on a form(which everyone does), the other stole 120k of a businesses money.
Stealing 125k or more definitely deserves jail time
It was HER OWN MONEY genius.
@@kevcwmsThat's not what embezzlement means... genius. She stole money at work. Now she'll do a few months, pay back a pittance, and ghost the people that trusted her out of almost $100k.
But yeah, it was hers. Obviously.
@@ChironetaMaxima It has become clear to me that you don't actually understand the issue being discussed. Thus, it is unfortunate that you are so willing to so haphazardly jump into it. As I generally don't engage in open-source media to draw battle lines, and certainly not with anyone who very clearly employs a ready-fire-aim approach to discourse, I will leave you to your puerile confusion.
Additionally, if you had any idea of what you were trying to address, then you'd understand that embezzlement was not an actual part of this. However, so much for that. Meant no harm.
@ChironetaMaxima Hello, Yesterday I responded to your comment on this video post, when I clearly didn't have to. I recognize that I was being reactive, not thoughtful. Please accept my apology for my harsh response.
Thank you.
@@kevcwms Kevin you’re fucking wild. Also wouldn’t be a crime to steal your own money. It was stolen and stealing is criminal
This country’s main principle is HYPOCRISY
True facts.
File a formal complaint on that judge with that states bar association
Both of these Criminals should go to prison.
100 % This guy's spot on, but unfortunately for all of us, critical thinking is a thing of the past.
The judge's job is to EXECUTE JUSTICE, not "make an example to others". It is called a "justice system", not a "deterrence system" or an "example to others" system.
Well yes, but the application of such is a constantly moving standard of law, and why laws are passed and exist.
Regardless if the endless opinions you or I may hold about the application, the founding principle of equal, equitable, and fair treatment us present in all descriptions and definitions.
So, my personal belief about this is deterrence is an important or necessary part in the equation. If there is no deterrent component in punishment for breaking the law, it is a quick step to believe there will be more crime; otherwise you are simply punishing. And if you are only punishing then it is purely vindictive action.
At the minimum, everybody should have the exact same same treatment by justice regardless of office, wealth, influence, etc. That is not just in sentencing and what not, but in the entire treatment of someone from investigation, arrest, and trial of hearings.
NO!!!! Read the Mosby case. It was a statement about a $5,000 payment for a mortgage application. BIG DIFFERENCE.
@@paulsweeney2959I would like to enhance your example. Rich people getting a $450 ticket for misusing a carpool lane to get home vs a low wage earner misusing the carpool lane getting that same ticket trying to get to work.
It's a legal system not a justice system.
@@paulsweeney2959 California is proof enough what you say is true. They are not stopping crimes less than a $1000, so petty theft has skyrocketed.
Imagine being convicted of 34 felonies while having 4 other court cases pending for additional criminal activity and still being able to run for president. 😂
Imagine he wins the election anyway. 🤷🏻♂️
John Lennon wrote a social commentary song on this......Imagine......
@@jeffreyjeziorski1480 actually the song that's about this by Lennon is called "How Do You Sleep?".
Imagine having tons of trumped up charges pushed against you for 9 years because our political opposition fears you so is trying to throw evverything they can think of to stop you.
Makes me feel like we're in the USSR.
Make an example... Make her pay a penalty. I don't want my taxes going to house prisoners who could be functioning normally in society.
They should both go to prison for at least a year. They should be made an example of. The amount of crime that is just looked over and even accepted as normal practice is harmful and destructive to society now and in the future it will just become worse until we stop accepting it.
We already know that it's a corrupt system. But what can we do to stop and also fix the problem ? The only hope we have is with people like you who are bringing this to everyone's attention.
Tell us what we really need to do in order to stop this madness.
Why did state prosecutor get home confinement? That is not punishment at all!
Maybe the story this guy told about the prosecutor leaves out key facts. Just maybe 😊
trump will probably get the same for 34 felonies which is ridiculous!!😭‼️ 2Tiers for sure
She did not embezzle so let’s get it straight. The money in question was from her 401k contributions she lied to withdraw.
@@JCPenny-il8rd... You're absolutely right!! The prosecutor took money from her OWN retirement plan. It was HER money, she didn't steal from anyone. The shame is in the fact that retirement plans are allowed to hold people's money hostage when they need it and they feel forced to try to get around the stupid rules just to get THEIR OWN money.
Putting a prosecutor in prison with criminals they prosecuted doesn't sound very safe. Same thing goes for putting cops in prison. Solitary confinement for an entire year could be contested as "cruel and unusual punishment" - thus home confinement.
White collar crime must be punished equally. You wNt to put everybody else in prison, fair is fair. No more two tiered system of justce!
White collar crime should be punished but they do not represent a danger to society the same as someone who holds a gun to your head taking your money. I would prefer a lower level prison with work release until complete restitution (punitive damages included) are made.
NAW EPH THAT!!! Needs to be equal!!! Historically we people of color have complained about the system and rightly so… the man in this video spoke of a woman who STOLE $120K and only served 4months?!? WTF!!!! Meanwhile in the hood we have people going away for a decade for robbing a few hundred or a couple thousand $$ from 7Eleven or Stealing Cars AND THEY SHOULD GO TO JAIL but please keep the same energy with these “white collar crimes!!” Because stealing a $30K Toyota is way less than stealing $120K!! Two Tiers For Sure!!
@@davidmc8475 Eh, they are a danger to society, just in a less direct way.
If you are convicted under felony standards, go to JAIL>
Trump. For. Prison.
@@dalmac5978 Exactly. After appeals filed & resolved, then proper sentencing should be applied. Too many "white collar" criminals get little or no prison time.
@@dalmac5978 By the way, I support Trump even if he goes to prison. haha