Chess but I have to spin the wheel each move...

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 783

  • @ИванВасильев-б9ъ
    @ИванВасильев-б9ъ ปีที่แล้ว +1160

    In fact, Martin spins a similar wheel for his moves. It has 9 "blunder" and 1 "move"

    • @pi_man3
      @pi_man3 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      Unless it's mate in one.

    • @MrMinecraft5578
      @MrMinecraft5578 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      It's ". . . Martin spins* a . . ." Mr. Ivan Vasl'yev.

    • @ИванВасильев-б9ъ
      @ИванВасильев-б9ъ ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@MrMinecraft5578 ok, I redacteds

    • @MrMinecraft5578
      @MrMinecraft5578 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@ИванВасильев-б9ъOk but, *reacted. Also did I get the name right?

    • @uunholyy_
      @uunholyy_ ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ​@@MrMinecraft5578 ngl u sounding like a nerd but alr

  • @calculuslover2078
    @calculuslover2078 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    It's such joy when he gets a pawn, even if it's a mere pawn, and Martin has the ability to get a whole queen.

  • @anamealastname607
    @anamealastname607 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nelson asking whats the best blunder, was the funniest thing I’ve seen in chess

  • @fadingintent
    @fadingintent ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I think you need to move every turn. Change "Give Martin a Queen" to "Move, then give Martin a Queen". If you can't execute an action, "Move, then give Martin a Queen". "Move, then get a Pawn". That will make the game moving and that should give you more control and feel more like chess (but with a wheel).
    I guess you will have a problem that after you Move, Martin will immediately make a move. So maybe if you want to give a Queen: Move, Martin Moves, give him a Queen, then spin again...

    • @meissmart6678
      @meissmart6678 ปีที่แล้ว

      how about “Give Martin a Queen, then Move”

    • @fadingintent
      @fadingintent ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@meissmart6678 Then there is the problem that you always place the queen in a spot where you take it immediately so the queen isn't really there - you would just place it on a spot where you want to reposition your knight, for example. Unless you would make a rule that you can't take the new queen immediately after you place it. Then it would work.

  • @dentonyoung4314
    @dentonyoung4314 ปีที่แล้ว

    Change it to "Give Martin a Knight" and make it "Nelson gets a Bishop".

  • @teresawang8727
    @teresawang8727 ปีที่แล้ว

    Make the”give Martin a Queen”into give him a rook.

  • @Austro-Hungarian_Mapping
    @Austro-Hungarian_Mapping ปีที่แล้ว

    In the second game when you had to blunder the queen, ,you couldve blundered a knight instead

  • @athiefinthenight6894
    @athiefinthenight6894 ปีที่แล้ว

    You shouldn'tve had to respin every time you gave martin a queen but rather just did a move you wanted to.

  • @yangli6428
    @yangli6428 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mistake:Nxf7 in the first game is actually not a blunder, which makes a trap: Taking on f7 allows a perpetual.

  • @kogmawmain8872
    @kogmawmain8872 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should have put Martin's Queen somewhere where you can capture it.

  • @nidhikapoor3794
    @nidhikapoor3794 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    give yourself a rook.

  • @michaelzautner4848
    @michaelzautner4848 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd suggest having any time you get a result that gives a piece it is then followed by a move instead of another spin to prevent giving a bunch of pieces back to back. This would include being unable to capture/check. Should make things go a bit faster for you, and give you a chance to react to the new queen.

    • @rockinblues7491
      @rockinblues7491 ปีที่แล้ว

      That would completely nullify the consequences of Martin getting a new queen tho. If you automatically get to move right after you place the queen, you can just place it where you could just capture it right away.

    • @michaelzautner4848
      @michaelzautner4848 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rockinblues7491 I guess you could since there isn't any rule about how to place the queen, but assuming you don't place them quite that freely (which he wasn't), and remember that it is still a move you might not want to make since you may have wanted to capture something already on the board.

  • @bcsa8079
    @bcsa8079 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well at like 14:19 you can just put your pawn on g6 (you win if you roll move next turn but I don’t know if it’s too easy if you can do this.btw if you can’t you can try to put martin’s queen in front of you room or something to capture it right after

  • @somethingwithnoname9127
    @somethingwithnoname9127 ปีที่แล้ว

    What I don't understand is, if giving Martin a queen counts as a move then why didn't you place a queen next to your rook every promotion? He never would have had a chance to have an extra queen...

  • @MiguelKoscianskiVidal
    @MiguelKoscianskiVidal ปีที่แล้ว

    Change the options to something like:
    "Move and then Give a Queen"
    and
    "Move and then get a pawn"
    This way, you will always be able to move and limit it to 1 extra queen per move.
    Also, if possible don't make all the options with the same weight.
    Looking at the other comments, I agree with many there...
    Would be great if the new queen position is random, but this could be tragic.
    Give it one more try as is, but without that "if I can't do it, then I will give an extra queen part". Instead, if you can't do whatever you have to do, just spin it again.
    Considering, for example, a position where there's only one legal move allowed, there's a chance you would fill the board with queens before being allowed to do the only legal move.
    And what would you do if the first spin is "check" or "capture"?

  • @tomass_00
    @tomass_00 ปีที่แล้ว

    12:02 there was ng6 forking the rook and the queen!

  • @yeshagoyal2966
    @yeshagoyal2966 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    10:29 g4 because discovery attack

  • @TheShadowGamingSquad
    @TheShadowGamingSquad 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bruv free queen 💀💀

  • @_Blacklagoon_
    @_Blacklagoon_ ปีที่แล้ว

    3 move 1 blunder 1 give a queen 1 capture... what take when spin?
    of course 3 blunder and 3 queen

  • @Supergoon1989
    @Supergoon1989 ปีที่แล้ว +2113

    OMG, you should have put a MUCH larger percentage of the pie as 'move' - This went exactly as I expected with these segments.

    • @Anewedition2024
      @Anewedition2024 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      you have 2 comments on this video

    • @Supergoon1989
      @Supergoon1989 ปีที่แล้ว +140

      @@Anewedition2024 Actually it's closer to 5. Maybe 6. I sometimes watch a bit, then make a comment, then watch a bit more. Then 1 more final comment at the end when i'm done watching.

    • @harrycop7944
      @harrycop7944 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@Supergoon1989 smart

    • @RubyPiec
      @RubyPiec ปีที่แล้ว +41

      @@Supergoon1989 i'm always scared of doing that because it makes me look like a spammer and annoying

    • @chaosbuilder1531
      @chaosbuilder1531 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@RubyPiec same

  • @Cyrus79979
    @Cyrus79979 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    “What’s the best blunder” never thought I would hear that from him 😂

    • @DevanBhat
      @DevanBhat ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bb8

    • @cristif92
      @cristif92 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I wounder why he didn't watch the game review for seeing if those moves were really blunders or not 😂

    • @Sameenashah
      @Sameenashah 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      G2-G4

    • @Sameenashah
      @Sameenashah 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And eval bar

  • @quentind1924
    @quentind1924 ปีที่แล้ว +652

    Here are my suggestions for next time :
    Replace "give martin a queen" to "give martin a random piece" (and spin another wheel with all 5 pieces with equal pfobability)
    Add some rules to where you can place pieces. I know you do it fairly, but you should add some contidions. Like you can’t place one of your pawns in the 7th rank (even 4th rank is too high) nor place it where it can capture a piece (so 11:00 should have not be legal). And for the opponent’s pieces you add, same thing you can’t place it where you can capture it
    The "move" should have 50% to get rolled i think, and maybe rename it to "no conditions" (so that there is no ambiguity for if a capture/check is legal when you roll this)

    •  ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Maybe rather make the piece probability inverse of their value.

    • @user-sl6gn1ss8p
      @user-sl6gn1ss8p ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @ that's probably too weak then

    • @Ishaan419
      @Ishaan419 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Maybe queen to rook next time

    •  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@user-sl6gn1ss8p there's literally infinite number of functions and their parameters, I think it's possible to find sweet spot.

    • @user-sl6gn1ss8p
      @user-sl6gn1ss8p ปีที่แล้ว

      @ yeah, definitely, I just think being 9 times more likely to give a pawn than a queen is kind of too weak. But yeah, that does depend on the other parameters as well

  • @Supergoon1989
    @Supergoon1989 ปีที่แล้ว +454

    10:25 How about Knight to G5? It blunders the knight because his knight or Queen can just take it, and you have it undefended.

    • @Rqwwqw
      @Rqwwqw ปีที่แล้ว +11

      True

    • @sevillaa6532
      @sevillaa6532 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      I thought the same thing 😅😅

    • @stevejackson2471
      @stevejackson2471 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Me too.

    • @thelengendofzelda1
      @thelengendofzelda1 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      He seems to miss a lot of knight blunders

    • @vbyte.
      @vbyte. ปีที่แล้ว +6

      same

  • @lindabeckley6382
    @lindabeckley6382 ปีที่แล้ว +354

    I think if you land on an option you can’t do, you should re spin the wheel. Each time you land on something you can’t do (blunder, check or capture), it’s like having 3 extra slices that mean giving Martin a Queen. The odds of you giving Martin a Queen are a lot higher than they appear, making it a lot more difficult to win!

    • @nwoDekaTsyawlA
      @nwoDekaTsyawlA ปีที่แล้ว +10

      While I agree with the assessment, I think that the second was very interesting because Nelson had to adjust his strategy to be able to perform the actions in order to avoid giving Martin the queen.

    • @KororaPenguin
      @KororaPenguin ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Or omit the add-a-piece complex altogether. Roll a d12. An even number means move like normal. A 5, 7, or 11 means capture if possible. A 3 or 9 means check if possible. And a 1 means play a move that is, to the best of your knowledge, a blunder. A result you cannot obey means re-roll.

    • @mistytrussell642
      @mistytrussell642 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KororaPenguin L

    • @mistytrussell642
      @mistytrussell642 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oops I didn’t want to type😂

    • @arishnicoff2621
      @arishnicoff2621 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rats I just commented the exact same thing

  • @bsmoov7
    @bsmoov7 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    Only 3/8 choices actually let you move. Also you could be more aggressive with pawn placement when you get a free one. Use the pawn to fork his pieces. Or put one on the 7th rank

  • @shanoc5902
    @shanoc5902 ปีที่แล้ว +123

    One of the tweaks I think you could make, is that after 'Give Martin a Queen', you shouldn't have to roll the spinner again, you just automatically get a 'move' afterwards. This could also apply to giving yourself a pawn but doesn't need to, it's mainly so that the game doesn't get locked down by giving Martin pieces over and over again as I feel that sometimes it got bogged down by that without advancing the game state. Adding some rules to how the free pieces/pawns are allowed to be given out might also be a good idea, as while in this I feel you did it pretty fairly, having a bit more structure might be nice so that you can't say place a pawn on the 7th rank for a free queen on the next move.
    Another thought is that maybe instead of just 'Give Martin a Queen', you have it so that there's a 'Give Martin a Rook', 'Give Martin a Bishop', and 'Give Martin a knight' and you have all 4 of these options have 1/4th the chance of being chosen relative to everything else (non-valid rolls like 'check' when you can't give one just result in a re-roll). You could also potentially replace one of the 'Move' options with something like 'Push', where you have to move a piece/pawn but are not allowed to capture.

    • @toww2246
      @toww2246 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree then if he spins the wheel and it lands on like give Martin a queen he should just move and give Martin a queen, and same if he can’t give a check or capture he should still be able to move after those options

  • @ashtub2866
    @ashtub2866 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    10:30 he could've played Ng5

  • @blomman1719
    @blomman1719 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I think it'd be interessting with one option being "tag out". That swiches opponant from martin to stockfish and back.

    • @DaTimmeh
      @DaTimmeh ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @arandomgamer3088I love the image of Stockfish seeing a mate 5, executing the initial move(s), then gets tagged out and Martin blunders mate in 1 immediately somehow.

    • @ArCgon
      @ArCgon ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@DaTimmeh Usually even Martin is able to see mates in 1 (as he did in both games here).

    • @DaTimmeh
      @DaTimmeh ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@ArCgon he sees when he has mate in 1, but he ofc still blunders mate in 1 opportunities for the opponent, that’s what I was referring to. Like stockfish seems m5, plays the first 3 moves till m2, then Martin does something stupid and blunders m1 against him.

    • @Mr.StealYourGirl81
      @Mr.StealYourGirl81 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh wow I guessed where you were going to place every queen you gave Martin and every pawn you gave yourself 😅 I’m feeling pretty smart

  • @shrankai7285
    @shrankai7285 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    10:33 You had knight g5

  • @StuckinthePastSP
    @StuckinthePastSP ปีที่แล้ว +10

    4:26😂 right when he said the queens don't help he just got another one

  • @CgVibin
    @CgVibin ปีที่แล้ว +17

    At 10:35 you could have blundered knight on G5

    • @okok72277
      @okok72277 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was screaming this at my screen 😭😭

    • @PermY988
      @PermY988 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@okok72277 same

  • @WalacaVencano
    @WalacaVencano ปีที่แล้ว +16

    10:40 You could have blunder your knight on h3 with Ng5.

    • @hugo57k91
      @hugo57k91 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad someone else noticed it too, he's being too harsh on himself with the blunders. Just cause he has to blunder doesn't mean he has to do the worst one

    • @Godkiller3145
      @Godkiller3145 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes

  • @genericusername-qq1du
    @genericusername-qq1du ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I loved the idea of a regenerating pawn storm versus the queen army! As other commenters have said, this would work beautifully with a slightly larger portion of the wheel being 'move'

  • @nintendonerdsvideos4727
    @nintendonerdsvideos4727 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I'd like to see a match with 2 grand masters playing both with the wheels

    • @KororaPenguin
      @KororaPenguin ปีที่แล้ว +2

      THAT would be very interesting indeed!

    • @oZqdiac
      @oZqdiac ปีที่แล้ว

      Magnum Carlos vs hikaru

  • @ProKameron
    @ProKameron ปีที่แล้ว +4

    7:05 If you play this clip near a Google Home, it'll think he said "Ok Google"

    • @slifer0081
      @slifer0081 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Haha

  • @lillithplays6514
    @lillithplays6514 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The truth is Martin's been using this wheel the entire time

  • @LindaLooUK
    @LindaLooUK ปีที่แล้ว +12

    When you have to give or receive a piece you shouldn't be spinning again IMO: it should be Martin's move next. This was fun by the way. 🤩

    • @apolo7178
      @apolo7178 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He can’t do that: that is not how that site works

    • @grubbygeorge2117
      @grubbygeorge2117 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@apolo7178you sure? Can’t you decide who moves next when making a custom position?

    • @therandomone93
      @therandomone93 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@grubbygeorge2117 either way its a bad idea, nobody moves you just give martin extra material theres no reason to make it his turn

  • @grimreaper7854
    @grimreaper7854 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Here is my idea. Feel free to modify it as you see fit or discard it entirely Nelson. I welcome any suggestions from anyone in the replies :). Also, if you have a way to send this to Nelson so that he may be more likely to see it, I have no problem with that, but please try to simplify it(or improve it) first if you can and don’t mind. Now onto the LONG idea, bare with me. When you roll an option you can’t do, you can use the eval bar to determine who gets what. [0.0 or Nelson’s advantage: (martin gets a queen). An advantage of 2-5 for Martin: (Martin gets a rook). An advantage of 6-9 for Martin: (Martin gets a knight). An advantage of 10-12 for Martin: (Martin gets a bishop). An advantage of 13-19 for Martin: (Martin gets 2 pawns). An advantage of 20-25 for Martin: (Martin gets 1 pawn). An advantage of >25 for Martin: (the system reverses in favour of Nelson per 5 advantage added on). Eg. 30 for Martin: (Nelson gets 1 pawn), 35: Nelson gets 2 pawns, 40: Nelson gets a knight or bishop (his choice), 45: Nelson gets the piece he didn’t choose from bishop or knight, etc. For M2 in favour of Martin: Nelson can move one of his pawns to any square (can only be done once every 5 moves, so if in cooldown, Nelson has to move one of his pawns one square backwards except any pawns in adjacent files to the moved pawn.) For any forced mate that nelson has < 7, Nelson must must move one of his pawns(including en Passant) first then for 2 rolls, Nelson can make any legal move.] Finally, if Nelson cannot do his eval-based move, Nelson must roll again. EASTER EGG: if Martin uses en Passant, Nelson gets a queen or to re-roll the roll after the en Passant (his choice).

  • @Dubanx
    @Dubanx ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I could have told you from the start this would go horribly. Having a 50% chance of something going wrong in a game with dozens of moves is going to mean a stupidly large number of bad things happening.

  • @superorange3698
    @superorange3698 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    10:40 Knight g5?

  • @Supergoon1989
    @Supergoon1989 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Change it so that 'Move' has to actually be a move, not a capture. But it takes up more space of the pie than it already does. Capture should change to 'capture or give Martin a Queen' and is also slightly larger in pie-area. Maybe do a couple of very thin pie segments for 'give martin a bishop', 'give martin a knight', etc. ....And Maybe one very small segment for 'Nelson gets a knight'. Maybe it'l come up at crucial moments and save you ;)

    • @Supergoon1989
      @Supergoon1989 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Added to this, maybe have some segments that are 'Move or Capture' so if you roll that, then you do get to choose and do exactly what you want. - This was how you were playing 'move' in this version.

  • @dancingwithyourghost9087
    @dancingwithyourghost9087 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You should be able to move every turn, and the spin is just a modifier. If you land on "move" on the spinner, then you just don't have a negative modifier

  • @franklinturtle9849
    @franklinturtle9849 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Try this ratio:
    20% Any Move You want
    20% Martin Queen
    20% Pawn or minor piece for you
    20% Blunder
    20% Skip your turn

  • @yungthunder2681
    @yungthunder2681 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think you don't understand the engine definition of blunder.
    You always went for the worst possible blunder when you had like 5 other, much less awful blunder options

  • @szihamidt6611
    @szihamidt6611 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You dont need to blunder piece, you can blunder position. Saving ur pieces against martin is the best solution

  • @prim16
    @prim16 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I love this idea! But it's best to incorporate more normal moves in there. How about something like...
    -Move or Capture (2)
    -Move Only (2)
    -Capture Only (2)
    -Blunder (2)
    -Give Martin A Queen (1)
    -Give Nelson A Pawn (1)
    70% of the moves are beneficial for you, but it's also challenging because 20% of them have a forced capture, which means you have to strategize to make sure one is available. Since Martin only gets a queen 10% of the time, you won't run away into this runaway queen nightmare

    • @newmeta2668
      @newmeta2668 ปีที่แล้ว

      Might make it a bit too easy but definitely better than the current wheel

  • @BenTheCuber
    @BenTheCuber ปีที่แล้ว

    10:35 knight to G5

  • @codypierce5196
    @codypierce5196 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My kids love it when you challenge Martin. They are always asking if there is another Martin video.

  • @TheDougWay
    @TheDougWay ปีที่แล้ว +9

    If you could just put his new queen wherever you wanted, why not just put it where you could take it? lol
    Edit: to make it fun, have something like this on the wheel: 20% give martin a pawn/bishop/knight/rook/queen (4% each) and spin again, 30% move, 20% blunder, 15% capture, 15% check

  • @bayramozanermis4000
    @bayramozanermis4000 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    10:32 I must blunder my Queen meanwhile the knight on h3 that has a blunder move with g5

  • @shiva-ji-777
    @shiva-ji-777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bro got a knight to blunder but blundered ...one and only......
    'The Queen' !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..
    !!...!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!

  • @lysy-zn2gg
    @lysy-zn2gg ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you have to blunder in my opinion you don't have to actually blunder a piece eg. 15:19 the blunder would be just not taking the queen.

  • @ethancampbell245
    @ethancampbell245 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I think that the second set of settings is actually really good and that the best way to go forward is to develop some better strategies to help give you “bad” options without losing your advantages
    Practicing for a few games off camera while allowing extra time to analyze may help to get an idea for which moves to make that are very different from normal strong moves

  • @HuntingKingYT
    @HuntingKingYT 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    13:45 why not place at d5 for the fork?
    14:39 what about Nc4?

  • @RishanthKarthy
    @RishanthKarthy ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Challenge
    If martin attacks any of your pieces they will turns into a statue except the king . You can only move the statue pieces by putting any of your piece near them .if any piece is already near them before they were attacked, then they don't turn into a statue.

    • @RishanthKarthy
      @RishanthKarthy ปีที่แล้ว

      Challenge
      Chess against Martin but you should not capture any of his queen or rook until his knight, bishop and pawns are captured

  • @art-games6230
    @art-games6230 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Stockfish next? But the punishments are for stockfish

  • @razerjet5318
    @razerjet5318 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    9:40 Should have put the pawn on g6

    • @slifer0081
      @slifer0081 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why?

    • @slifer0081
      @slifer0081 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why?

    • @ytozylea8869
      @ytozylea8869 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, the benefit is to attack the rook in h7 but you cannot do that because it is too easy if you are gonna put it on your opponent’s side so you can only put pawns on your side of the game and not technically anywhere.

  • @CodSweat-gb2xg
    @CodSweat-gb2xg 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    He could have blunder the knight on right side???

  • @Ra8_builder
    @Ra8_builder 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    3:16 could Nelson win from this position?

  • @JudeMarquezgaming
    @JudeMarquezgaming ปีที่แล้ว +1

    17:18 you could have moved your king to d1 not defending the pawn and not in check

  • @jsohi0082
    @jsohi0082 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is such a clever idea. I actually kind of like random chance in strategy games like this. I am wondering if anyone has suggestions for abstract strategy games with some input randomness/luck involved.

  • @Skuy_Brawl_Stars
    @Skuy_Brawl_Stars ปีที่แล้ว +1

    On 10:35 you could blunder your knight (kg5)

  • @robertmasek9978
    @robertmasek9978 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I think placing the queens differently could help a lot, like placing them where you can capture them

  • @lyylski
    @lyylski ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You need like at least 1/3 of the wheel as "move" (if move allows capture, if move doesn't allow capture then capture also needs to have much bigger segment). I think you could also divide the "give Martin a queen" into multiple different ones around the board like "give Martin a horse/bishp/pawn" etc. so it's not just fighting against queens. Actually I think that balances itself enough that you don't even need to give yourself pawns anymore. Maybe.

  • @educat1on166
    @educat1on166 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1:39 Nf3? not taking the queen is a blunder too isnt it?

  • @khadiplays1410
    @khadiplays1410 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    10:39 u should have blundered ur knight on g5

  • @magicalcube589
    @magicalcube589 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    10:33 you could have blundered the knight

  • @aboodeditz3856
    @aboodeditz3856 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    10:35 could’ve blundered knight on g5

  • @LOGANoAce
    @LOGANoAce ปีที่แล้ว +1

    10:34 kg5 is a Blunder 😢 Not the queeeeeen 😂

  • @lakoeu
    @lakoeu 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Imagine he put his pawn on the 8th rank

  • @hollowknight1737
    @hollowknight1737 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    10:49 could've blundered knight

  • @toolng1798
    @toolng1798 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:44 not moving the bishop would also be a blunder

  • @xcorrelation
    @xcorrelation ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Make it so that when you get a pawn / give Martin a queen, you should just be allowed to move whatever you want automatically

  • @its210pm2
    @its210pm2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    1% chance to give Nelson a gun

  • @sh3lol520
    @sh3lol520 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    this is the best! please do part 2

  • @koala_connor4060
    @koala_connor4060 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    10:34 The H3 Knight to G5 was a blunder

  • @Kirito_wr
    @Kirito_wr ปีที่แล้ว

    I just tried this Challenge against Stockfish
    This is how it went
    P:e6
    M:exf7 Kxf7
    Q:f3
    Nxf3 d5
    Q:e5
    Nxe5+ Ke8
    B:Nd3 Nc6
    M:e3 e5
    Q:e2
    Bxe2 Nf6
    P:e7
    M:Pxd8=Q Kxd8
    C=Qc3
    Nxc3 d4
    M:exd4 exd4
    P:d7
    P:e6
    B:Nb4 Bxd7
    M:exd7 Bxb4
    M:Nb2 Kxd7
    M:0-0 Rae8
    B:Nc3 dxc3
    B:Ba6 bxa6
    +:dxc3+ Bd6
    M:Bf4 Re6
    M:Qd3 Rhe8
    C:Bxd6 cxd6
    B:g4 Nxg4
    +:Qxd6 Kxd6
    M:Rad1+ Kc7
    Q:d3
    Rxd3 Nh6
    P:d7
    Q:d1
    dxe8=N+ Rxe8
    P:d7
    C:dxe8=N+ Kb6
    M:Rxd1 Nf5
    C:Nxg7 Nxg7
    M:Rd6 Nf5
    C:Rxc6 Kxc6
    P:f7
    Q:e8
    fxe8=Q+ Kc7
    B:Rd4 Nxd4
    M:cxd4 h5
    B:Qb8 Kxb8
    Q:e3
    fxe3 Kc7
    B:Kh1 Kb6
    +=Qg2
    Kxg2 Kc6
    B:Kh1 Kd5
    +:e4+ Kxd4
    M:Kg2 Kxe4
    B:Kh1 Kf3
    M: c4 Kg4
    P:g7
    C=Q:f8
    gxf8=Q h4
    M:c5 h3
    +:Qg7+ Kf4
    M:c6 a5
    C: Qxa7 Ke5
    M: c7 a4
    C:Qxa4 Kd6
    M:c7=Q Ke5
    M: Qag4 Kd5
    Q:d7
    Qcxd7+ Ke5
    +:Qgd4# 1:0

  • @stealthbeastgaming
    @stealthbeastgaming ปีที่แล้ว

    You can definitely win this, but you need to obliterate one of his sides at all cost, then set yourself to get pawns with free promotions. You got a million wheel-gift pawns, if half of them were queens you'dve had something to work with.

  • @auraliant_t9884
    @auraliant_t9884 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    12:38 Ng6 IS A FORK QUEEN AND ROOK

  • @yonglay1038
    @yonglay1038 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    BRO HE COULD’VE BLUNDER WITH PAWN ON E5!

  • @konoveldorada5990
    @konoveldorada5990 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I recommend these type of videos.

  • @byronwindhorst3220
    @byronwindhorst3220 ปีที่แล้ว

    Chess but you can't move to or capture or move through the four center squares d4 d5 e4 e5.. The bots can use them normally.. Knights can move around the edge of the mountain for example N from d3 is allowed to move to f4 . .
    ..
    Special rules about Checks and Checkmate = Checks which go through the center squares are not allowed.. You are not allowed to do a check that relies on a piece to defend it through the center even if it's checkmate.. . For example: Black K on c8, ..White B on h2. and White Q on f7. The White Q can't move to c7 because the B on h2 is NOT defending the Q. on c7, because the Bishop can't defend the Q through the center squares, so you can't make that Q move (unless some other piece not working through the mountain can defend). (Why? The Computer would think the Bishop is defending the Q for checkmate.)
    ..
    Play against Nelson. You can call it "She'll be coming round the mountain when she comes." These variations are neat. I'm not great on explaining things so please ask for clarification. Would really like to see how you work without being able to access the center squares or go through them.

  • @christopherheckman7957
    @christopherheckman7957 ปีที่แล้ว

    4:26 "How do you like those five queens, Martin? They don't help you!" * "Give Martin A Queen" comes up on the spinner.
    (Eventually, there won't be any blank squares.)
    8:35 Martin plays the Grob!

  • @williamsquires3070
    @williamsquires3070 ปีที่แล้ว

    These silly little exercises in futility always end badly. Maybe time for a “!!” move instead. Like “Give Nelson an extra queen”, and “Give Stockfish a free pawn”, but you have to play Stockfish at its highest level, not poor old Martin.

  • @fatercoelho7476
    @fatercoelho7476 ปีที่แล้ว

    move is move (not capture), add a "skip" where it just goes back to his turn.
    also, it feels like you were not playing strategically, I'm not that good at chess so maybe this is completly false, but i felt like you could have placed some of those pawns in really threatening ways (forks, checks...) but just played defensively, same with the queens, if u are planning to promote your pawn wouldn't you just place his queen in the pawns path and capture afterwards?
    did you had some extra rules in the pawn/queen spawning like placing pawns only on your side of the board?

  • @deaths488
    @deaths488 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    10:34 BLUNDER THE KNIGHT!!!

  • @alyvav.trauma2440
    @alyvav.trauma2440 ปีที่แล้ว

    17:14 RULEBREAK, you blunderd with capturing, so you are disqualified for this session :)

  • @alexandrucirtu6506
    @alexandrucirtu6506 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    nothing I love more than seeing your martin saga!

  • @Zalied
    @Zalied ปีที่แล้ว

    At first I thought with both sides being given pieces the game could be infinite. But actually chess has a max amount of moves even with adding pieces since eventually (I mean a loooooong impossible universe ending eventually) you would still 3 fold repeat. All those Pawns becoming knights bishops queens moving all over the board.
    You'd be able to keep pawn moves and captures available so no 50 move end. But eventually all board states would happen. No matter what rules u used to add any piece at any time to both sides their is a finite (though ridiculous) amou t of board states.
    So eventually you'd hit every single one twice and then the next move draws

  • @erikstephens6370
    @erikstephens6370 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another challenge idea: Play against Stockfish with the wheel of luck.
    In 4 out of 5 wheel slots, you play a move.
    If you land on the 5th one, you get to remove one of Stockfish's pieces: use another random number generator to decide which piece type you can remove, based on how many of each piece is left. For example: if there are three stockfish pawns and two knights remaining, the number generator should have a 3/5 probability of choosing pawn, and 2/5 of choosing knight. If you land on pawn, you can pick which pawn you want to remove (you'll need as much agency as you can get).

    • @danielbrown001
      @danielbrown001 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought of this as well! Have the wheel be mostly good things for the player. Could even have slots for giving yourself a piece. Or a slot for “Martin makes Stockfish’s next move” etc. Would be fun!

  • @JasonMitchellofcompsci
    @JasonMitchellofcompsci ปีที่แล้ว

    You should have make the "give martin a queen" "give martin a queen and move." Giving him multiple extra queens per move isn't even close to fair.
    Also I've noticed on multiple videos you run out of memory on you tabs. What OS are you on? If you are on Mac or Linux you should set up some swap space.

  • @samwright6853
    @samwright6853 ปีที่แล้ว

    Besides getting 3 blunders in a row really early on, I think you could've made it easier on yourself if you hadn't developed like it was a normal chess game. when you can't check, capture, or blunder in a position it raises the likelihood of giving martin a queen to more than 50%, which just isn't sustainable

  • @Dausuul
    @Dausuul 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Since the wheel inevitably favors Martin (giving him queens faster than you can take them, forcing you to squander your own pieces), I think it's better to aim for the fastest possible win (e.g., scholar's mate) and minimize the impact. It seemed like you were trying to play normal chess against a skilled opponent, instead of chaos chess against a newbie with random cheat powers.

  • @DonatoMaster10
    @DonatoMaster10 ปีที่แล้ว

    I did the challenge.
    My results:
    Without the "get a pawn" option, I lost.
    With that option, I also lost.
    So I replaced it with "get a knight" and won.
    btw I'm new to chess, so I made it so that in the blunder option you can also make an inacurracy/mistake.

  • @soundrogue4472
    @soundrogue4472 ปีที่แล้ว

    In games of RNG there is a reason why you have a large set of variables; you're playing with too little variables in other words. I'm still trying to become a game designer, and this is a common flaw; you need more RNG elements here to stop something like this from happening, otherwise you'll snowball the difficulty, and not in a fun or fair way.

  • @nuagor
    @nuagor 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You gave yourself pawns on passive squares and gave Martin queens on safe squares. Give him a new queen being attacked by your pawns. Give yourself a pawn that's attacking his pieces. Also, maybe we should change "give a new piece" to be "give a new piece + move" so you don't chain it.

  • @Shadowwand
    @Shadowwand ปีที่แล้ว

    I think changing it to ban yourself from certain moves is a more interesting idea than giving Martin a queen.
    Any Move.
    Must Capture
    Must Check
    No capture or Check
    Blunder

  • @coltonjohnson7693
    @coltonjohnson7693 ปีที่แล้ว

    Personally, I wouod have changed "Give Martin a Queen" to "Give Martin a Piece" and made a seperate wheel with the names of each piece on it (except King, of course) so that the piece Martin got would be random.

  • @kruksog
    @kruksog ปีที่แล้ว

    You made this too hard on yourself. Also, on the "give Martin a queen" spins, you gave him a queen and then spun again. It obviously depends on how you want to do this, but it felt to me like you should just get to move after giving him a queen. Like, it felt like you spun twice for those turns to me.
    Love your content Nelson.

  • @pinthunters9961
    @pinthunters9961 ปีที่แล้ว

    i think you were fooled by the 3 green fields. the slice has 7 fields, only 3 are green. that means in more than half of all moves you don't get green. and of the other 4 fields only 50% are advantageous for you. and the bad 50% are right next to each other.... they're screwing you^^