I'm not sure of any that shows o1-mini has changed. Are you seeing issues with it? It is a smaller model than o1, so we would assume poorer results across many domains.
@@brightideasagencyI've noticed that previously the 01-mino was efficient at tracking my conversations and managing my code requests comprehensively. However, recently it struggle with recalling details. For instance, when I ask for my C++ code in sections, it used to provide all the necessary parts, but now it often delivers only incomplete segments. its like i am using an old model now
I don't think the intended audience of niche users finds the pricing so ridiculous. Some people find a $50+ per month Microsoft 365 E5 tier ridiculous if you can buy Business Basic for ~$40 less, but those businesses that rely on it see the value.
@@DavidSmith-uq4mj yes, and nor is this tier aimed at normal users. It's aimed either at users with specific higher level needs in terms of reasoning, or to users who use ChatGPT so much they are limited by the already fairly high ChatGPT Plus usage limits. If neither of those conditions apply to you then no one is suggesting you buy a $200/mo subscription.
As a completely blind person, I’ve been waiting for them to come out with live video calling with chat gpt. Now that it’s out I’ve upgraded to not have a cap on that feature.
i tried it mainly for sora. for just one month it might be worth checking out but if you just get it for the ai video stuff. at half the price runway gen 3 alpha's unlimited plan is a better deal unless you also work a lot with the ai text models too. but to me sora is not really ready for primetime. there is too much issues with physics and it takes a LOT to work to get outputs that to me are usable vs runway gen 3 alpha. but hey for one month wasnt bad to try . lol
I don't see Sora as a compelling reason for the expense, it seems more like a toy to experiment with right now rather than something that can be deeply integrated into value-adding workflows. I'm sure there are lots who will try it, but I question whether most would get $200 of value on the video side versus just a subscription to an existing stock footage service. As the length of video clips increases I'm sure this will change.
Hey, I would like to pay you half of the subscription to share the account, that way is less expensive for both of us. Lmk if you would be interested. Thanks
No, for sure I will never subscribe to this new 200$ greedy version. I think OpenAI will work on making their plus subscriptions weaker, and I really noticed this point! My subscription with the Turbo model five months ago was much better than the o4! So I think they will continue this strategy to force us to subscribe to their new pro version. They are really "greedy" I hope the new Chinese Deepseek AI model will compete with them soon.
If you are gaining $20 or $200 or more of value from using ChatGPT, why is it greed for OpenAI to charge that amount? The question on your side must be whether any investment is paying you a return. The only way this should feel greedy is if you're in the category of user who just wants ChatGPT Pro because it sounds better than ChatGPT Plus, but if you have no use case for the extra features or extra compute, you'll get no benefit from it.
I've been using chatgpt daily since 2023! And from my observations, after they made a subscription for 200 dollars, the version for 20 dollars began to work worse, in my opinion, they cut the size of the context window.
Why not just have one plan of 10$ limited and 20$ unlimited instead of 200$? NO ONE in their right mind would pay 200$ per MONTH just to have an unlimited amount of typing and the same thing just better lol.
I'm sure lots of people with the right use cases are subscribing to ChatGPT Pro. I'm not one of them, but my use is not what this is intended for. The question is, how much value does it deliver, and for some niche users, the answer will be far more than their $200/mo investment.
@@brightideasagency probably just doing a video as you did, but besides that, 200$ for unlimited, when it could have been for the 20$ plan, is crazy, in my opinion. Why would I pay even 20$ for limited access, though? If the 20$ was unlimited, I'd probably pay for it once. But yeah... 200$ is not even going to help them or a good way to get us to pay for that. Sorry if I sound rude or anything
@@soul8648 I think you're missing the point a little. If you have no use case for ChatGPT Pro that makes sense for you or gives you value, then I don't think OpenAI cares if you buy it or not. However, if you currently have ChatGPT Plus and you need more because you hit limits, Pro is there as an option (as if Teams, and direct API access if that makes sense). Just because it's most expensive doesn't mean it's best, it's only best if the features that are making it more expensive are valuable to you. Now, if they would be of value to you, but you don't want to pay it, that's ok too. I'd enjoy driving a $100,000 sports car, but that doesn't align with my other financial priorities.
@@brightideasagency sorry about that lol, I'm not a native English speaker, so it's a little hard for me. But I get your point, though; it's worth it if you either make money out of it or use it for something big, right? So I use it every day for anime roleplay aka rp. will it be worth paying 20$ a month? Or just the free plan?
01 mini has been nerfed intentionally. Now it can seem to track all information's on previous chat...
I'm not sure of any that shows o1-mini has changed. Are you seeing issues with it? It is a smaller model than o1, so we would assume poorer results across many domains.
@@brightideasagencyI've noticed that previously the 01-mino was efficient at tracking my conversations and managing my code requests comprehensively. However, recently it struggle with recalling details. For instance, when I ask for my C++ code in sections, it used to provide all the necessary parts, but now it often delivers only incomplete segments. its like i am using an old model now
200$ per month = 2400$/year... Ridiculous..
I don't think the intended audience of niche users finds the pricing so ridiculous. Some people find a $50+ per month Microsoft 365 E5 tier ridiculous if you can buy Business Basic for ~$40 less, but those businesses that rely on it see the value.
@@brightideasagency if you a business yes, but for just normal users the price is excessive.
@@DavidSmith-uq4mj yes, and nor is this tier aimed at normal users. It's aimed either at users with specific higher level needs in terms of reasoning, or to users who use ChatGPT so much they are limited by the already fairly high ChatGPT Plus usage limits. If neither of those conditions apply to you then no one is suggesting you buy a $200/mo subscription.
Could not have said it better. Thank you.
Thanks for watching!
You are welcome.
As a completely blind person, I’ve been waiting for them to come out with live video calling with chat gpt. Now that it’s out I’ve upgraded to not have a cap on that feature.
Thank you for sharing this interesting use case. How are you finding the live video so far?
i tried it mainly for sora. for just one month it might be worth checking out but if you just get it for the ai video stuff. at half the price runway gen 3 alpha's unlimited plan is a better deal unless you also work a lot with the ai text models too. but to me sora is not really ready for primetime. there is too much issues with physics and it takes a LOT to work to get outputs that to me are usable vs runway gen 3 alpha. but hey for one month wasnt bad to try . lol
I don't see Sora as a compelling reason for the expense, it seems more like a toy to experiment with right now rather than something that can be deeply integrated into value-adding workflows. I'm sure there are lots who will try it, but I question whether most would get $200 of value on the video side versus just a subscription to an existing stock footage service. As the length of video clips increases I'm sure this will change.
Hey, I would like to pay you half of the subscription to share the account, that way is less expensive for both of us. Lmk if you would be interested. Thanks
No, for sure I will never subscribe to this new 200$ greedy version. I think OpenAI will work on making their plus subscriptions weaker, and I really noticed this point! My subscription with the Turbo model five months ago was much better than the o4!
So I think they will continue this strategy to force us to subscribe to their new pro version. They are really "greedy"
I hope the new Chinese Deepseek AI model will compete with them soon.
If you are gaining $20 or $200 or more of value from using ChatGPT, why is it greed for OpenAI to charge that amount? The question on your side must be whether any investment is paying you a return. The only way this should feel greedy is if you're in the category of user who just wants ChatGPT Pro because it sounds better than ChatGPT Plus, but if you have no use case for the extra features or extra compute, you'll get no benefit from it.
I've been using chatgpt daily since 2023!
And from my observations, after they made a subscription for 200 dollars, the version for 20 dollars began to work worse, in my opinion, they cut the size of the context window.
Banger, bro!
Thanks for watching!
Why not just have one plan of 10$ limited and 20$ unlimited instead of 200$? NO ONE in their right mind would pay 200$ per MONTH just to have an unlimited amount of typing and the same thing just better lol.
I'm sure lots of people with the right use cases are subscribing to ChatGPT Pro. I'm not one of them, but my use is not what this is intended for. The question is, how much value does it deliver, and for some niche users, the answer will be far more than their $200/mo investment.
@@brightideasagency probably just doing a video as you did, but besides that, 200$ for unlimited, when it could have been for the 20$ plan, is crazy, in my opinion. Why would I pay even 20$ for limited access, though? If the 20$ was unlimited, I'd probably pay for it once. But yeah... 200$ is not even going to help them or a good way to get us to pay for that. Sorry if I sound rude or anything
@@brightideasagency I don't mind to sub for 20$ but people won't pay 200$ for a month
@@soul8648 I think you're missing the point a little. If you have no use case for ChatGPT Pro that makes sense for you or gives you value, then I don't think OpenAI cares if you buy it or not. However, if you currently have ChatGPT Plus and you need more because you hit limits, Pro is there as an option (as if Teams, and direct API access if that makes sense). Just because it's most expensive doesn't mean it's best, it's only best if the features that are making it more expensive are valuable to you. Now, if they would be of value to you, but you don't want to pay it, that's ok too. I'd enjoy driving a $100,000 sports car, but that doesn't align with my other financial priorities.
@@brightideasagency sorry about that lol, I'm not a native English speaker, so it's a little hard for me. But I get your point, though; it's worth it if you either make money out of it or use it for something big, right? So I use it every day for anime roleplay aka rp. will it be worth paying 20$ a month? Or just the free plan?
This should have been a 30 seconds video
Thank you for spending the extra 30 seconds to leave a comment.
$200 + $40 VAT in the UK. That's a joke.
Depends if it saves you $250 or not somewhere else. Everything is reasonable in price if it’s more economical and equal quality than the alternative.