I remember seeing this at the Cinema upon release. And in fairness the pre title sequence and let's say Bonds incarceration, hand over & subsequent escape did up the ante for a more edgier Bond & something for Brosnan to sink his teeth into. Then after the hotel sequence it totally jumped the Shark & morphed into an entirely different movie. And the shift in gears was jarring. Suffice to say I still have a soft spot for the crashing plane sequence at the end. Spot on review as always. Keep em coming.
Absolutely agree! The pre title and Bond being swapped in the demilitarized zone etc was not only brilliant but this could have been the best 007 movie ever. But then it went to complete crap, which is what I find frustrating about this film.
Thank you Stam Fine for this characteristically considered and humorous critique. Also kudos to you for highlighting how Mr Brosnan remains an excellent Bond in spite of the dubious quality of other elements of this installment of the franchise.
What's frustrating about this film is those scenes with M showed what this film could have been, a dark exploration of the life of a secret agent. Such a shame.
--- CORRECT . . . which uneven-ness indicates that the "know-it-all" producers interfered with the screenplay writers, because "anybody" can write a script; you need only type letters onto paper.
@@marianotorrespico2975 The tonal inconsistency is baffling. In one corner you have Bond being tortured in North Korea for 14 months, an ice cold head of Mi6, a rogue agent pursuing a terrorist, and even a subtle reference to 9/11. Then in the opposite corner, "DNA replacement", ice palace, giant diamond laser in space, an invisible Aston Martin, and a rip off of the Holodeck from Star Trek. At the very least, the writers and producers should have aimed for something in the middle.
"Feels like florescent clowns fired out of a cannon at an Ibiza rave..." - once again, Mr Fine, you have made my Friday with your deliciously exquisite verbosity. The weekly grind is always softened by the thought of another of these hitting the 'Tube. They're a genuine treat & please keep 'em coming! 😊
Absolutely bang on, in respect to this film not ageing well. Casino Royale, a few years later, felt like a breath of fresh air by comparison. Sadly, the Craig era ended with a little "shark jumping" of its own. No idea where the producers go from here, but once again, they would do well to get back to getting the basics right.
Was No Time To Die really an example of Shark Jumping though? Certainly biowarfare (considering that we have just moved on from COVID) seems more realistic than using the Sun as a Giant Weapon. In fact, the bigger problem with NTTD is how undeveloped the antagonist actually is.
@@marianotorrespico2975 madonna has no business showing up in a bond movie. for me sitting in the theatre, that was the exact moment i turned from oh fun another bond film to well...damn.
@@wrockage --- WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT!? . . . that despite her prettiness, Madonna is a yawn-inducing bore incapable of any self-awareness, professional or personal
Madonna "I don't like cockfights". The writing was so bad in this bond movie, that line was literally the best the writers could come up with, and it was the best line in the whole movie. Seriously, I could have done better by have Madonna walk away silently.
My personal favourite was the godawful exchange between Bond & Jinx "So what do predators do when the sun goes down?" "They feast like theres no tomorrow!" Lmao! Such Shite!!
That is certainly a stretch to call that the best line of the film in my opinion. DAD is filled with both cheese and great moments, some hidden amongst some rough edges unfortunately. I do enjoy the film though, especially Arnold’s score!
The one thing I did like was that there was a through line from the pre-credits scene, the credits covering his months of torture, and then flowing into his escape and the rest of the movie. Yes, a shame Madonna had to have a cameo, but it was a short one. Regarding Jinx, I remember an interview with either Halley Berry or Samuel L Jackson, where Samuel L Jackson said her character name should have been Cinnamon Buns, LOLs. Personally I think Pierce Brosnan had another 007 movie in him (maybe if the Remington Steele producers hadn't been such shits when he was first up for the role, we might have got one).
I really enjoyed this when I originally saw it at the cinema. Looking back now, especially after the gritty realism of the Craig era, it's certainly quite ridiculous . Still think the first half holds up quite well though.
I soon as the invisible car was revealed I knew someone was going to give Bond away by running into it while it was invisible. So predictable, as if the writers were not even trying to be creative.
I must confess i do like this film. Rumour had it Paul Darrow ( Avon from Blakes 7) had a tiny roll in the infirmary on the ship which Bond escapes from in Hong Kong, but this bit ended up on the cutting room floor.
11:54 oh my! For a long time I couldn't understand why people criticised the surfing effect, as I thought it looked pretty good. Then I realised they were not talking about the pre-credits surfing: there was more after the title sequence i.e. the point I always changed channels.
I sometimes wonder if Bond being "otherwise engaged" during the year 2001 is meant to explain in some subliminal meta way why he wasn't around to stop 9/11? Same goes for Superman in Superman Returns.
I'm friends with the FX artist who did the Bond parasailing on the glacier scene. It was thrown together, last minute, rushed, and poor Brosnan had no idea WTF was happening.
This film reminded me of a Carry On film with the level of nauseating double entendres. I remember my Dad took my Mum and I to see it in a cinema. When we left he simply turned to us sadly and said “sorry”. We consoled him saying “that’s okay, you weren’t to know, it’s not your fault.”
I remember me and my mates going to see this and pissing ourselves laughing at the invisible car and out surfing the tidal wave. We nearly did ourselves internal damage for the laughing when Graves turns around in the ludicrous exo suit and goggles.
I thought Kotto was rather dull but it wasn't his fault, he didn't get much of a role. I think the one who stole show was Baron Samedi. A single laugh from him was more memorable than the entire film.
I knew Bond movies had jumped the shark when I saw an invisible car in the previews! :( I'm a little surprised he didn't actually jump a CG shark on his parachute propelled surfboard during the climax.... Bond movies often swing between overly gritty and overly campy... This one tried to swing both ways at once and split open its pants....
Thank you for the chuckle-fest. Cheers Mr Fine, Stam Fine. Good grief this film was bad. The moment the blood-transfusion-DNA-transformation plot was revealed we walked out and and went to the pub. Probably the best decision in the world.
I loved this movie in theaters. I saw it in first day it was released in canada. I bought the VHS and later the DVD. Yes I bought it twice. Of course it's silly. CGI is awful..but I still love this movie. It was never a contender for the best 007 flick. Was never going to be a classic. But I judge a movie by how many times i re-watch it. I re-watch this more than most 007s. The only true negative in this movie is that it precludes Toby stephens from ever playing Bond on the silver screen.
This is a good film... until it gets to Cuba. Bond getting captured and then burned by MI6, continuing his mission by co-opting the help of the Chinese and tracking down Zhou to Cuba is all good, but after that it all goes downhill.
I like it. I enjoy laughing at the glacier calving surf scene and get REALLY annoyed about the 'Antonov's' wings in flight in the final sequence: the production was so rushed that they didn't realise that wings curve UPWARDS while in flight as they take the weight of the plane, only curving down on the ground due to their own weight. It's silly, and I think it's Brosnan's best Bond. But yes, it's a very silly movie.
that is a completely reasonable comment, sir! i guess it's my bias to enjoy space and sci-fi that explains why despite the hokeyness, i really love moonraker. also, the score is quite beautiful.
great review, i always find your opinions and comments spot-on. i despise this movie and it makes me crazy that it is so bad. love bond otherwise. thanks for sharing!
First REAL comment - another fine effort from STAM FINE ... been waiting for your review of DieBondDie ("the Bond the") ... and not a disappointment! (Unlike this Bond film)
Brosnan was saddled with scripts written by committees, weak villains, and producers who either stage managed good directors or hired crap ones. He desperately lobbied to get the producers to buy hte film rights to Casino Royale, to get some meat into the role, but was denied, in favor of ridiculous product placement, pointless stunts that don't advance the plot, bad CGI, and a lot of actors who took the cash and wanted to be in a better film. However, the point I knew this one was bad was just after the opening credits. the point where I knew it was the worst POS in the entire series (including View to a Kill) was when Graves parachutes in, to the sounds of the Clash, selling out. What was even sadder was that they did the same for Jaguar ads. Yes, there is nothing more punk than allowing your songs to be used to sell Upper Class spies and luxury cars. Phony Beatlemania may have bitten the dust, but phony White Riot was choking on irony.
The Brosnan years of Bond is a reflection of what happens to all major franchises, it becomes too iconic for it's own good. Producers fear new ideas so they only make regurgitations of the past material. Yet on the other hand, I am starting to sort of pine for these years because these days, the producers seem to actually fear what this series once was.
I live this film no matter what. Might😢even gotten better with age especially if you listen to the song, might be bonds mind trying to get him m through the torture.
SPECTRE really gives Die Another Day a run for its money at the bottom of the favorites list. Although DAD is worse from a film perspective, Spectre is rather boring. Of the two, I’d rather watch DAD.
When i saw this film back in the cinema in Portsmouth, i left knowing id seen the worst Bond film ever. And not jus because we were sat right at the very front and my neck hurt afterwards (as did my eyes from watching some trash). Some Daniel Craig films have come very close to taking the title, but DAD still reigns supreme in the shit list.
Look, a gritty James Bond that's in keeping with the novels is all well and good, but I can't help feeling that the James Bond film series lost something after this one. Audiences had a very clear picture in their heads about what to expect when going in to a James Bond movie, and really, Die Another Day really was the last time we got a 'James Bond movie' in that sense. Some people might claim that they couldn't keep making Bond movies with cheese, nonsense stunts, and over the top villains with massive planet destroying lasers after Austin Powers had thoroughly skewered those elements. But all of that was what audiences expected from James Bond. I enjoyed Casino Royale, but quickly tapered off the Craig movies, and I don't think I've even seen them all. Because the essence of a James Bond movie is entirely missing from them. In the cold light of 2023, I think what audiences would respond favorably to would be a wholehearted return to this kind of James Bond. Quippy, able to hold his own, an unashamed womanizer who women actually want, battling against over the top cartoon villainy using improbable gadgets and not breaking a sweat while doing it. That's what 'movie James Bond' is. Embrace it.
It seemed like the later Craig movies, particularly "Spectre", were trying to re-introduce all of the traditional Bond formula elements to the series, and that didn't really work with Craig's Bond, whose thing was that he was just this terrifying bulldozer of a man who had managed to get his heart broken in "Casino Royale" and still wasn't OK. So maybe they have to reboot it again to get that stuff back in and make it work.
@@ricardocantoral7672 --- TRUE . . . but the director's contempt for the material shows in that he laughs at James Bond and not with James Bond; wrong employee, because XXX was a lively film.
I liked the story, the opening title theme, the evil Bond Girl...there's a lot to love in this film...if only Halle had bought it in the end during the sword fight. "Jinx" in every sense of the word. She had as much business being in this movie as she did playing Catwoman.
A film with so much promises that in the end delivered very little and Brosnan deserved a better send off than this after his brilliant performances in his previous movies . .
Omg that song was ATROCIOUS. Dunno how it got so much radio play (other than payola). That try-hard pseudofuturism, that trash vocal effect...tbh it fits the movie pretty well!
Before the invisible car, the film was poor.... The invisible car was insultingly bad. After the invisible car, the film was terrible.... The ICARUS was insultingly bad. By the time he's kite surfing, I was done. What a waste of a big Bond budget...
Comment section challenge: The writers cast Madonna as the hapless henchman that Bond off's with one of his cheesy tools, and gets the even more cheesy Bond departing comment. What is the method, and what is Bond's line?
This video is as close as I'll ever get (unless someone invests in titanium chains and rabid wolverines) to rewatching Die Another Duh. That CG isn't just bad it's fling-your-feces-at-the-screen bad.
Thanks for remininding me how annoying the ramp editing was. Totally took you out of the moment in the cinema - and I was already short of patience after the invisible car, etc etc etc.
I'll be honest, I've probably seen the Halle Berry sex scene roughly 20 times more than the single time I saw the entire film. I was one and done. I was never a Pierce Brosnan fan and this was the worst of the James Bond junior high school boy theatre. Bond has dabbled in science fiction before - I mean, look at Moonraker. But even that had some suspenseful scenes. Suspense is all but dead in movies in general, and in Bond films in particular. I have my criticisms of the Craig era, but this was the worst 007 film for me. Diamonds Are Forever and A View To A Kill had editing issues and Die Another Day is a better made film than those ones, but the script is the worst of the series, particularly the dialogue. Did they just pick a random 13 year old boy and have him write this? Invisible cars, VR sex fantasies and general cringe abound. People complain about Bond dying, but they must just be the Zoomer and Millennial Marvel bunch. This is the movie that almost killed my fandom. At least we got Casino Royale 4 years later.
I think Bond being killed is really offensive. I think it's more aggravating than anything in Die Another Day. At least this film has some respect for James Bond. These last two Bond movies tell me that the producers really don't care about 007 anymore.
Imo Brosnan was more Bond than Craig....& Dalton was more Bond than Brosnan. That said had Die Another Dad had the tone of For Your Eyes Only and less sc fi Brosnan would have nailed it.
Egh… you had to ruin a good video at 12:10 by saying that bullshit. It’s actually a decent song. Yeah it’s Madonna in the worst bond film so it’s an easy target… the lyrics and the melody of the verses are top notch.
Looks like a train wreck, ironically, the only stunt that wasn't included. They turned a North Korean man into a posh English fop with floppy hair? Pretty sure that's racist somehow... and did everybody in the theatre call 'Jinx!' whenever Halle Berry's character came on screen? Maybe you had to be there.
The Last two Brosnan Bond movies were both terrible despite Brosnan being a good Bond. Anything after it may have been god but I cannot stand that proletarian, Craig.
--- THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF MEDIOCRITY . . . bespeak that "the children" -- Broccoli and Wilson -- dislike the James Bond product more than did their daddies, because "Die Another Day" (2002) coulda, woulda, shoulda been, at the least, an entertaining 007 movie, like "Octopussy" (1983).
I don’t hate any bond movie. But this is probably the one that tests my patience the most
I remember seeing this at the Cinema upon release. And in fairness the pre title sequence and let's say Bonds incarceration, hand over & subsequent escape did up the ante for a more edgier Bond & something for Brosnan to sink his teeth into. Then after the hotel sequence it totally jumped the Shark & morphed into an entirely different movie. And the shift in gears was jarring. Suffice to say I still have a soft spot for the crashing plane sequence at the end. Spot on review as always. Keep em coming.
Absolutely agree! The pre title and Bond being swapped in the demilitarized zone etc was not only brilliant but this could have been the best 007 movie ever. But then it went to complete crap, which is what I find frustrating about this film.
@mrmeerkat1096 yes you're right. What could have been.
If Brosnan had been given better scripts to work with he could have been one of the greatest bonds ever.
Concur (nearly) 100% ~
{Brosnan seems a better actor than Craig but his films have had weaker scripts than those of the "Blond Bond"}
Agree. I think Brosnan was robbed by the writers. He was a better actor than that.
Robert Wade and Neal Purvis are the main reason for Pierce Brosnan downfall.
That's the problem, better scripts wont work for Brosnan, he was an actor with limited acting skills
Thank you Stam Fine for this characteristically considered and humorous critique. Also kudos to you for highlighting how Mr Brosnan remains an excellent Bond in spite of the dubious quality of other elements of this installment of the franchise.
You're right. There's very little in this film that is rewatchable.
What's frustrating about this film is those scenes with M showed what this film could have been, a dark exploration of the life of a secret agent. Such a shame.
--- CORRECT . . . which uneven-ness indicates that the "know-it-all" producers interfered with the screenplay writers, because "anybody" can write a script; you need only type letters onto paper.
@@marianotorrespico2975
The tonal inconsistency is baffling. In one corner you have Bond being tortured in North Korea for 14 months, an ice cold head of Mi6, a rogue agent pursuing a terrorist, and even a subtle reference to 9/11. Then in the opposite corner, "DNA replacement", ice palace, giant diamond laser in space, an invisible Aston Martin, and a rip off of the Holodeck from Star Trek. At the very least, the writers and producers should have aimed for something in the middle.
"Feels like florescent clowns fired out of a cannon at an Ibiza rave..." - once again, Mr Fine, you have made my Friday with your deliciously exquisite verbosity. The weekly grind is always softened by the thought of another of these hitting the 'Tube. They're a genuine treat & please keep 'em coming! 😊
Absolutely bang on, in respect to this film not ageing well. Casino Royale, a few years later, felt like a breath of fresh air by comparison. Sadly, the Craig era ended with a little "shark jumping" of its own.
No idea where the producers go from here, but once again, they would do well to get back to getting the basics right.
Was No Time To Die really an example of Shark Jumping though? Certainly biowarfare (considering that we have just moved on from COVID) seems more realistic than using the Sun as a Giant Weapon.
In fact, the bigger problem with NTTD is how undeveloped the antagonist actually is.
Best description of Michael Madson's acting ever.
--- TALK ABOUT TURDS IN THE SOUP . . . Madsen and Madonna in a 007 movie? Talk about the salesman not liking the product he is selling.
@@marianotorrespico2975 madonna has no business showing up in a bond movie. for me sitting in the theatre, that was the exact moment i turned from oh fun another bond film to well...damn.
@@wrockage --- WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT!? . . . that despite her prettiness, Madonna is a yawn-inducing bore incapable of any self-awareness, professional or personal
" Looking like a bystander if The Incredible Hulk sneezed in the Engagement Ring section of Tiffany's. " - Genius!
John Cleese was a fun Q, I wish he had been in more Bond movies
As do l.
Madonna "I don't like cockfights". The writing was so bad in this bond movie, that line was literally the best the writers could come up with, and it was the best line in the whole movie. Seriously, I could have done better by have Madonna walk away silently.
Madonna doesn't *do* silent very well. You could argue she does dialog even worse, I suppose.
My personal favourite was the godawful exchange between Bond & Jinx "So what do predators do when the sun goes down?" "They feast like theres no tomorrow!" Lmao! Such Shite!!
"I'm still not quite sure how good you are?" "I'm soooo good" "Especially when you're bad"
End of film 😂
That is certainly a stretch to call that the best line of the film in my opinion. DAD is filled with both cheese and great moments, some hidden amongst some rough edges unfortunately. I do enjoy the film though, especially Arnold’s score!
“There are no small roles, only small actors “ talking about Madonna🤣😂🤣😂Stam you’re ruthless
that was brutal
I love DAD. It’s a guilty pleasure! It’s silly but fun.
I thought the invisible car was dumb as rocks back then! But now I feel it’s a very cool idea ahead of its time! 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤓🤓🤓
Just ignore the tire tracks it leaves.
@@CantankerousDave why would it not leave tyre tracks? It’s just invisible not disappeared! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
I don't know, I haven't seen them in a while, but I love all the Pierce Brosnan Bond movies.
That fucking Incredible Hulk line was priceless man
The one thing I did like was that there was a through line from the pre-credits scene, the credits covering his months of torture, and then flowing into his escape and the rest of the movie. Yes, a shame Madonna had to have a cameo, but it was a short one. Regarding Jinx, I remember an interview with either Halley Berry or Samuel L Jackson, where Samuel L Jackson said her character name should have been Cinnamon Buns, LOLs. Personally I think Pierce Brosnan had another 007 movie in him (maybe if the Remington Steele producers hadn't been such shits when he was first up for the role, we might have got one).
MGM felt that Brosnan did have one more film in him. Michael G. Wilson and Barbara Broccoli thought otherwise.
Yeah, it is what it is! Still fun to watch...
I really enjoyed this when I originally saw it at the cinema. Looking back now, especially after the gritty realism of the Craig era, it's certainly quite ridiculous . Still think the first half holds up quite well though.
This is one of my favorite bond movies
I soon as the invisible car was revealed I knew someone was going to give Bond away by running into it while it was invisible. So predictable, as if the writers were not even trying to be creative.
I must confess i do like this film. Rumour had it Paul Darrow ( Avon from Blakes 7) had a tiny roll in the infirmary on the ship which Bond escapes from in Hong Kong, but this bit ended up on the cutting room floor.
No - I think he plays one of the doctors who exams Bond after he has been retrieved from Korea.
11:54 oh my!
For a long time I couldn't understand why people criticised the surfing effect, as I thought it looked pretty good. Then I realised they were not talking about the pre-credits surfing: there was more after the title sequence i.e. the point I always changed channels.
I sometimes wonder if Bond being "otherwise engaged" during the year 2001 is meant to explain in some subliminal meta way why he wasn't around to stop 9/11? Same goes for Superman in Superman Returns.
I always felt like this was the equivalent to batman and Robin of the 007 movies
I do agree that the first half vs second half is huge. But I actually happen to think that first half is amazing.
I'm friends with the FX artist who did the Bond parasailing on the glacier scene. It was thrown together, last minute, rushed, and poor Brosnan had no idea WTF was happening.
We come for the video, we stay for the LOLs
This film reminded me of a Carry On film with the level of nauseating double entendres. I remember my Dad took my Mum and I to see it in a cinema. When we left he simply turned to us sadly and said “sorry”. We consoled him saying “that’s okay, you weren’t to know, it’s not your fault.”
Lee Tamahori did go on to direct XXX 2. A few years later so I would say the theory is on the money.
I'm glad about the Jinx character. Much improvement compared to Christmas Jones in the previous film. In my opinion, of course.
I remember me and my mates going to see this and pissing ourselves laughing at the invisible car and out surfing the tidal wave. We nearly did ourselves internal damage for the laughing when Graves turns around in the ludicrous exo suit and goggles.
The note about Bond villains always exhibiting charm is very true. Yaphet Kotto's performance in Live And Let Die saved that film.
I thought Kotto was rather dull but it wasn't his fault, he didn't get much of a role. I think the one who stole show was Baron Samedi. A single laugh from him was more memorable than the entire film.
I knew Bond movies had jumped the shark when I saw an invisible car in the previews! :(
I'm a little surprised he didn't actually jump a CG shark on his parachute propelled surfboard during the climax....
Bond movies often swing between overly gritty and overly campy... This one tried to swing both ways at once and split open its pants....
Thank you for the chuckle-fest. Cheers Mr Fine, Stam Fine. Good grief this film was bad. The moment the blood-transfusion-DNA-transformation plot was revealed we walked out and and went to the pub. Probably the best decision in the world.
Yeah, that was the moment when the film went FUBAR. You left at the right time.
I loved this movie in theaters. I saw it in first day it was released in canada. I bought the VHS and later the DVD. Yes I bought it twice. Of course it's silly. CGI is awful..but I still love this movie. It was never a contender for the best 007 flick. Was never going to be a classic. But I judge a movie by how many times i re-watch it. I re-watch this more than most 007s. The only true negative in this movie is that it precludes Toby stephens from ever playing Bond on the silver screen.
James Camerons "True Lies" probably scared the bond folk more than anything
Class act as always Mr Stam Fine
I love this guy. He's not only does he get to the heart of the problems with this film, he does it with some unexpected jokes.
@@NealKlein agreed this channel is quality. 👍🏻
This is a good film... until it gets to Cuba. Bond getting captured and then burned by MI6, continuing his mission by co-opting the help of the Chinese and tracking down Zhou to Cuba is all good, but after that it all goes downhill.
I agree. The film jumps the shark when it introduces all the "DNA Replacement" crap.
Dude, Where's my sliders
Babe wake up, Stam Fine made it to the best Bond film
1:20 is a clip from The World is not Enough
I like it. I enjoy laughing at the glacier calving surf scene and get REALLY annoyed about the 'Antonov's' wings in flight in the final sequence: the production was so rushed that they didn't realise that wings curve UPWARDS while in flight as they take the weight of the plane, only curving down on the ground due to their own weight.
It's silly, and I think it's Brosnan's best Bond.
But yes, it's a very silly movie.
His best? 😮
His best performance as Bond. Besides, it's all opinion on this one: it's only a movie, after all.
@@jpofgwynedd3878
I agree, I think it was his best Bond performance. When it comes to the movies, I would go with Tomorrow Never Dies.
@@ricardocantoral7672 no argument from me
I remember Madonna and Bond's swordfight but that's it so I don't know if I've seen the movie or just a lowlights reel.
Same thing?
When viewed with my Moonraker hat on i can quite enjoy this film whilst also seeing its huge flaws
A good dose of Moonraker makes almost every Bond film look better, doesn't it?
that is a completely reasonable comment, sir! i guess it's my bias to enjoy space and sci-fi that explains why despite the hokeyness, i really love moonraker. also, the score is quite beautiful.
The film started promising and then from near the middle it went off.
great review, i always find your opinions and comments spot-on. i despise this movie and it makes me crazy that it is so bad. love bond otherwise. thanks for sharing!
First REAL comment - another fine effort from STAM FINE ... been waiting for your review of DieBondDie ("the Bond the") ... and not a disappointment! (Unlike this Bond film)
You know, I don't think I ever actually watched this one! Maybe that was a good idea.
Brosnan was saddled with scripts written by committees, weak villains, and producers who either stage managed good directors or hired crap ones. He desperately lobbied to get the producers to buy hte film rights to Casino Royale, to get some meat into the role, but was denied, in favor of ridiculous product placement, pointless stunts that don't advance the plot, bad CGI, and a lot of actors who took the cash and wanted to be in a better film. However, the point I knew this one was bad was just after the opening credits. the point where I knew it was the worst POS in the entire series (including View to a Kill) was when Graves parachutes in, to the sounds of the Clash, selling out. What was even sadder was that they did the same for Jaguar ads. Yes, there is nothing more punk than allowing your songs to be used to sell Upper Class spies and luxury cars. Phony Beatlemania may have bitten the dust, but phony White Riot was choking on irony.
The Brosnan years of Bond is a reflection of what happens to all major franchises, it becomes too iconic for it's own good. Producers fear new ideas so they only make regurgitations of the past material. Yet on the other hand, I am starting to sort of pine for these years because these days, the producers seem to actually fear what this series once was.
I fell asleep the first time I saw it.
And the second time.
And the third.
I love this film, it’s not great but I like it more than both Dalton films.
This is the only Bond movie I've seen in the theater. Can I pick 'em, or what?
Bond being captured in the cold open then traded back was a cool idea. But everything after that is pure dreck🤮
I’d watch this again over any Roger Moore Bond parody movie.
"Everybody Hates Zao will be right back after these messages!"
I live this film no matter what. Might😢even gotten better with age especially if you listen to the song, might be bonds mind trying to get him m through the torture.
Why didn’t they just call Graves something more cryptic, like Noom for instance. I’d have never guessed that.
SPECTRE really gives Die Another Day a run for its money at the bottom of the favorites list. Although DAD is worse from a film perspective, Spectre is rather boring. Of the two, I’d rather watch DAD.
When i saw this film back in the cinema in Portsmouth, i left knowing id seen the worst Bond film ever. And not jus because we were sat right at the very front and my neck hurt afterwards (as did my eyes from watching some trash). Some Daniel Craig films have come very close to taking the title, but DAD still reigns supreme in the shit list.
Stamfine i would love you to review every single season of 24 at some point
Pierce deserved a better swan song than this mess
I don't know about XXX but I remember thinking at the time it was trying to emulate Charlie's Angels.
They all fall into the same category, early 21st century action schlock.
Look, a gritty James Bond that's in keeping with the novels is all well and good, but I can't help feeling that the James Bond film series lost something after this one. Audiences had a very clear picture in their heads about what to expect when going in to a James Bond movie, and really, Die Another Day really was the last time we got a 'James Bond movie' in that sense. Some people might claim that they couldn't keep making Bond movies with cheese, nonsense stunts, and over the top villains with massive planet destroying lasers after Austin Powers had thoroughly skewered those elements. But all of that was what audiences expected from James Bond. I enjoyed Casino Royale, but quickly tapered off the Craig movies, and I don't think I've even seen them all. Because the essence of a James Bond movie is entirely missing from them. In the cold light of 2023, I think what audiences would respond favorably to would be a wholehearted return to this kind of James Bond. Quippy, able to hold his own, an unashamed womanizer who women actually want, battling against over the top cartoon villainy using improbable gadgets and not breaking a sweat while doing it. That's what 'movie James Bond' is. Embrace it.
Return to this kind of bond? No thanks...
Bond used to be unique until he became a Jason Statham wannabe.
It seemed like the later Craig movies, particularly "Spectre", were trying to re-introduce all of the traditional Bond formula elements to the series, and that didn't really work with Craig's Bond, whose thing was that he was just this terrifying bulldozer of a man who had managed to get his heart broken in "Casino Royale" and still wasn't OK. So maybe they have to reboot it again to get that stuff back in and make it work.
The sword fight was good.
The director decided to have CGI in the film well that was a good idea no wonder he's done sod all since
He directed the XXX sequel.
@@ricardocantoral7672 --- TRUE . . . but the director's contempt for the material shows in that he laughs at James Bond and not with James Bond; wrong employee, because XXX was a lively film.
@@ricardocantoral7672 yes I know also that nick cage film not directed anything good is what i meant
I liked the story, the opening title theme, the evil Bond Girl...there's a lot to love in this film...if only Halle had bought it in the end during the sword fight. "Jinx" in every sense of the word. She had as much business being in this movie as she did playing Catwoman.
#20 _did_ clearly (financially) bomb in the Western Pacific region - as well as being a dud with reviewers and (perhaps) hardcore fans!
So...is James Bond a Time Lord?
I agree that the film is ridiculous, cartoonish, and generally over the top, but it's still better than Diamonds Are Forever. Or A View to a Kill.
Captain Flynt is a bond villain?
13:58 - 14:18 ❤
Hehe, i thought the sword fight at the club was really outstanding. The CGI did ruin the movie however.
I hated it. That was way too over the top. That should have been in the finale of the movie.
@@ricardocantoral7672 yep it should have been toward the end.
A film with so much promises that in the end delivered very little and Brosnan deserved a better send off than this after his brilliant performances in his previous movies . .
Gustav graves reminds me of Elon Musk somehow. And not in a good way.
Omg that song was ATROCIOUS. Dunno how it got so much radio play (other than payola). That try-hard pseudofuturism, that trash vocal effect...tbh it fits the movie pretty well!
To quote this movie " your mama" .
Before the invisible car, the film was poor....
The invisible car was insultingly bad.
After the invisible car, the film was terrible....
The ICARUS was insultingly bad.
By the time he's kite surfing, I was done.
What a waste of a big Bond budget...
I was not a fan of this film, but it was a horrible way to celebrate 40 years of James Bond.
Comment section challenge: The writers cast Madonna as the hapless henchman that Bond off's with one of his cheesy tools, and gets the even more cheesy Bond departing comment. What is the method, and what is Bond's line?
No points if you just recycle the ending of Fatima Blush.
This video is as close as I'll ever get (unless someone invests in titanium chains and rabid wolverines) to rewatching Die Another Duh. That CG isn't just bad it's fling-your-feces-at-the-screen bad.
The model work of the hovercraft plummeting down those falls was more impressive than the CGI.
I saw this in the theatres and rolled my eyes so hard it gave me vertigo ...
Bloody awful movie. Almost insulting in it’s obnoxiousness. Poor Brosnan. The whole script is dad joke level puns. A big miss from a limp ass swing
Yeah, Brosnan deserved better than what he got during his run.
Ah, the movie that put me off James Bond & I didn't come back to it until Skyfall. What a turd.
Thanks for remininding me how annoying the ramp editing was. Totally took you out of the moment in the cinema - and I was already short of patience after the invisible car, etc etc etc.
👍
This film continues to own its spot on my list as the worst Bond movie of all time.
I'll be honest, I've probably seen the Halle Berry sex scene roughly 20 times more than the single time I saw the entire film. I was one and done. I was never a Pierce Brosnan fan and this was the worst of the James Bond junior high school boy theatre. Bond has dabbled in science fiction before - I mean, look at Moonraker. But even that had some suspenseful scenes. Suspense is all but dead in movies in general, and in Bond films in particular. I have my criticisms of the Craig era, but this was the worst 007 film for me. Diamonds Are Forever and A View To A Kill had editing issues and Die Another Day is a better made film than those ones, but the script is the worst of the series, particularly the dialogue. Did they just pick a random 13 year old boy and have him write this? Invisible cars, VR sex fantasies and general cringe abound. People complain about Bond dying, but they must just be the Zoomer and Millennial Marvel bunch. This is the movie that almost killed my fandom. At least we got Casino Royale 4 years later.
I think Bond being killed is really offensive. I think it's more aggravating than anything in Die Another Day. At least this film has some respect for James Bond. These last two Bond movies tell me that the producers really don't care about 007 anymore.
Imo Brosnan was more Bond than Craig....& Dalton was more Bond than Brosnan. That said had Die Another Dad had the tone of For Your Eyes Only and less sc fi Brosnan would have nailed it.
Die Another Day is infinitely better than any of the dreary Daniel Craig films. The last real James Bond film.
Die another day is the worst bond film ever
@@tomster95 Not while Spectre exists.
@@StephenBates_IT I think DAD is better than Quantum, SPECTRE, A View To a Kill, and Never Say Never Again.
Madonna has a small roll😅😅 although lately she's been having a lot more of them and having quite a lot of surgery to try and get rid of them 😅😅
Stam fine. The man who hates die another day and robin hood: prince of thieves. Well, he's funny
Egh… you had to ruin a good video at 12:10 by saying that bullshit. It’s actually a decent song. Yeah it’s Madonna in the worst bond film so it’s an easy target… the lyrics and the melody of the verses are top notch.
Looks like a train wreck, ironically, the only stunt that wasn't included.
They turned a North Korean man into a posh English fop with floppy hair? Pretty sure that's racist somehow... and did everybody in the theatre call 'Jinx!' whenever Halle Berry's character came on screen?
Maybe you had to be there.
You know, it might have been good watch if the whole film had callbacks and audience participation, Rocky Horror style. :)
@@richmcgee434 Agreed. I mean, I always do it, in my room, alone, with a bottle of vodka, till my flatmates bang on the door and tell me to STFU...
How is it racist?
@@LeftTownMedia Thanks to sarcasm; 'bout half the aforementioned bottle...
The Last two Brosnan Bond movies were both terrible despite Brosnan being a good Bond. Anything after it may have been god but I cannot stand that proletarian, Craig.
--- THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF MEDIOCRITY . . . bespeak that "the children" -- Broccoli and Wilson -- dislike the James Bond product more than did their daddies, because "Die Another Day" (2002) coulda, woulda, shoulda been, at the least, an entertaining 007 movie, like "Octopussy" (1983).
An absolute forgettable movie dear god
The worst Bond film played by the worst bond actor
Die Another Day isn't grea, but I can't think of a single song from the Craig Chales era, they're all shyte and forgettable.