THEY'RE POISONING US WITH FOOD ?? || Pegasus React
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ม.ค. 2024
- i love corporate research funding yahoo yipee
original video: • You Are Being Poisoned..
/ smugalana
/ smug_alana
/ discord
#vtuber #vtuberen #anime #animegirl #weeb #vtuberuprising #vtuberreaction #vtuberreacts #vtuberreact
Egg = bad
sugar coated corn dust with cardboard = good
This is just like the tobacco industry paying doctors to lie about the dangers of smoking
But eggs cause you to suffer longer...
Get diabetes and you can speedrun life.
People 100% still believe red meat is bad by studies done by big grain. Big grain got us hooked and is actually killing us and the government is too payed off to care.
Pretty much. Lobbying is one hell of a superpower.
This "food compass" is basically Jack Sparrow's compass from Pirates of the Carribean. It doesn't point in the direction a compass, it just points at what you want the most.
hell no, i don't want none of that sugary garbage. i love me my protein.
I'm barely seven minutes in, but this is immediately making me think of a video that was made to talk about why marketing snack foods as "junk food" was systemically oppressive to those in low income communities.
You look up the person that produced the video, and she worked for the company that makes those snack foods.
@@8_8787Ah yes apples and water, satisfies the whole food pyramid
I've noticed all the vegetarian foods and sugary foods are at the top in green and all the traditional meats and dairy are at the bottom in red. However when I look at the labels for vege and sugary foods, the labels are all in red for salt etc... :)
"I drink Brawndo, its got what plants crave... its got electrolytes" - idiocracy was a good movie, *not an instruction manual*
Ironic then that modern people don't get enough electrolytes, even while everyone says we are living through Idiocracy coming true.
Bro! I'm an avid cereal eater, I love fruit pebbles, but I'm not gonna pretend that that shit is nutritious, I'm literally eating artificial flavors and a shit ton of sugars.
This is why I'm skeptical of any "study" that's released from big scientific powers.
Sometimes, when you compare the results of a scientific study to a 'common sense' understanding of reality, and they don't make sense, it's because the thing being studied is complicated and unituitive to the way the typical human mind processes the world.
Other times it's because the study is flawed nonsense, be it due to corruption, systemic issues, or the people who did the study just screwing up for one reason or another.
Of course, in most matters the difference is difficult for the average person to get their head around (or at least, dificult to find the time to do the necessary research to understand the things they would need to understand in order to get their head around it)... but sometimes the bias is just Really Bloody Obvious when you look at what the result was compared to who paid for it. (also, often the actual experiments and research done produced entirely true and honest results, and the issues start croping up with the report written based on the results (making things look less bad for the boss), or once marketing/the executives get hold of that report and then straight up lie about it).
Hilarious that the fake mushroom meat is classified as "real food" when it's probably the most processed kind of food out there. I can't even touch it, just having it cross contamination in my food makes me sick.
Those researchers must have gotten paid well.
If you want to figure out what your food is majoritively made out of, the most common ingredients will appear on the list first, so if "sugar/glucose" appears at the top of the list, its probably going to eventually give you diabetes if you have too much of it
Diabetes is genetic. If you become diabetic because of your diet, you already had a predisposition for it at birth.
Not to say minimizing sugar isn't a good thing.
@ClokworkGremlin There are two types of diabetes. Type 1, the one you're thinking of, and type 2, the one mentioned in the original comment.
@@ClokworkGremlin I live with a woman that's not very small. She does not have the best diet and of course does not have diabeties because it's not a massive issue in her family. So yea I agree with you
@ClokworkGremlin There is a genetic factor, but like what was said there is type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Some people are more likely to develop type 2 with not a large amount of sugar intake but if your diet is bad enough for a long enough time your insulin receptors and the beta cells in your pancreas will slow down from excessive use. I've worked with so many diabetics they come in all shapes and sizes. I've seen someone with who runs marathons be type 2 diabetic from 50 years of 2-3 bottles (not the 2L) of soda a day
You know you've reached adulthood when you can't eat "dr sugar's chocolate covered frosted sugar O's" for breakfast without feeling sick
I literally heard a bald eagles cry while reading this.
If you get sick from consuming a sugary cereal, maybe stop eating the sugary cereal. Just a thought.
Although, telling a sugar addict to stop consuming sugar is like telling an alcoholic to stop drinking alcohol.
Im a sugar addict for 21 years and that couldnt be more true.
Muesli with yogurt bangs so hard it's unreal.
@@Weird_Alchemist42 I'm saying when I was a kid I could eat that crap every morning without a problem, but now in my 30s i can't have any sugar in the morning
It could be that this Food Compass is biased to favor vitamin-rich foods, regardless of nature. A lot of processed foods, like cereal, are artificially fortified with things like Vitamin A or Iron, so that they can plaster that as a health benefit on the box. That would cause them to rise higher on the chart than the lean meats, if you go purely on that aspect, and not on things like: calorie count, protein density, sugar, just…. Sugar
This. This is "mwah". A perfect example of someone going beyond the "numbers don't lie" trap.
Fruit Sugar is better than Processed Sugar.
Although eating too many fruits can be an issue. Portion control is key, not only for Fruits.
Only marginally. People don't realize how much sugar and carbs they eat on a daily basis. And it is all bad for you.
Most EU countries literally prohibit putting as much sugar in food as Americans do. For example, Coca Cola is different around the world because they will put exactly as much sugar as legally allowed in the can.
that is such an exaggeration, way do europeans think they are eating healthy? lool give me a break
@@RavenL1337 I don't know what you mean by "exaggerated" here. Sure, it varies between countries (some tax per sugar amounts, some restrict marketing, and some straight up limit the sugar volume), but they're not "freemarketing" it like the US.
@@RavenL1337 also you can just look at the back of the box of "the same" product in EU and US and see the difference in contents, try it.
So are people in the EU also not allowed to have more than 1 serving?
@@StainlessPot uk and usa sodas have a 2 gram difference in sugar but yeah massive difference
"Raisin Bran has so much sugar!"
Pffft, no it doesn't
**Checks. Turns out the Great Value brand version of Honey Bunches of Oats has less than a third of the sugar in Raisin Bran.**
👁️_👁️
Carbs turn into sugar in the body. So you are basically putting sugar on top of sugar for breakfast.
The fact that a grilled chicken breast is lower than 95% of that list is insane
thats the healthiest food i can even think of
The score chart is so messed up, because this chart could potentially give the next generation alot of misinformation. Imagine being so greedy you want to freak over people health wise.
>"What's wrong with ground beef?"
Nothing, it's beef (the most healthy thing we can eat if it wasn't pumped full of hormones and antibiotics) and therefore not "environmentally friendly" according to the WEF. Therefore your consumption of it must be limited to t burger patties a week while the rest of your protein has to be taken from bugs (and ignore that all the WEF people will get steaks every day).
And cereal is for children who's parents don't love them enough to make them a breakfast.
8:26 Serving size 29g sugar per serving 9g
Sugar makes up 1/3 of your bowl of Reese's puffs!
Of course it's a food compass. The moral compass broke decades ago
After seeing Frosted Mini Wheats at the top I was like, “Did Link make this list?”
remember the food pyramid they used to teach in school too, invert that shit too.
Definitely. If i remember correctly, the lead researcher for that study was kicked off because she was actually providing good healthy options and not what the companies funding the study wanted.
Sugar content in the "same" cereal is different in every single country that it is sold in.
There has been studies. Products of the same brand usually have the highest sugar content in the US and south america.
I cook all my own food. There’s an entire TH-cam community of prepared food recalls on TH-cam especially for budget friendly products. Plastics lead etc you name it it’s been recalled for poisoning. I cook I eat safe. Whole milk is great for you. If you’re not eating excess sugar and oil in the rest of your diet, and you live an semi active lifestyle.
Mind guiding someone in that direction? I'm looking for stuff that's healthy, and quick/ easy to make in the morning
@@unbiasedbios00 Oatmeal with Fruit takes 5 minutes in the morning. Making a dozen boiled eggs at a time for easy on the go breakfasts to go with a slice of toast are a couple options for the morning.
popcorn is actually pretty healthy as long as you don't cover it in salt and butter, it's very filling for the amount of calories in it
I'm not exactly educated on the subject but when it comes to something like soda there is a difference between the US and the EU. US soda is pumped full pf high fructose corn syrup, while I believe the EU heavily restricts the use of HFCS.
Yeah, but this is a vtuber who visited Europe several times. She's gonna know more about how things work in Europe than a European.
A lot of us in the US get our soda fix by buying Mexican Coke, which doesn't have the HFCS. American processed food is little more than an example why regulatory capture is bad.
Don't confuse Mexican Coke with Colombian coke. That's a good way to lose a weekend.
Tried to find source for this but its paywalled on some health site. But after reading their scoring system this compass looks to be "legit". Which means they used some dum science to get those scores. They detected 9 domains (nutrients, vitamins, minerals, etc.) scored them, and addet together to get "most holistic assesment of overall health impact". A may not understand it fully, but its not written to be easliy understood.
Anytime I see a list like this say meat and dairy is bad for you and then promote processed slop instead, I think of the Funni Economics Man telling me to eat bugs, no thanks.
Rule of thumb: you should be careful about the specifics of meat and dairy intake, but if they're being billed as just flat out unhealthy as a whole (rather than situationally depending on your health problems, how they're prepared, the environment the animal was raised in, etc. etc.) then it's something of a nonsense. Note this is seperate from how sustainable the associated industries are.
On the subject of bugs: Depending on the bugs in question and how they're prepared, some of them are perfectly healthy and taste just fine, just for reference. Again, not commenting on anything else about the idea.
@@laurencefraser Good. I'm all for you eating the perfectly healthy & tasty bugs. I'll eat the chicken which eats the bugs and everyone wins.
Its a good thing cereals arent famous here in asia, we usually eat something like rice with eggs with fish
This is SOOOOOOOOOOO unhealthy, you're going to die at -5 years old!
solution: flip the chart upside down
"trust the science" guys😅
13:57 Where is fish on that list?
Guess they just, swam away~
🚪🏃
its true though that lots of american food has more sugar in it than in the EU, for example froot loops in america got 38% sugar but where i am from its "only" 25%. america also uses corn syrup instead of sugar in some cases, but i dont really know the difference between that and regular sugar.
Results of these, "Health charts" are solely dependent on companies contributions to this list.
This is why we cook at home. Screw these Corporations and their greedy butt.
uncooked ground beef healthier than cooked ground beef, confirmed
I am now eat meatballs that I made from meat that I bought with white rice. It 100% healthy than those sugary snacks.
I had no idea you could use white rice as a currency.
(Its a joke)
You can trust these graphs just flip them first and you will be fine
You have to be careful with any oats or cereals as they also spray pesticides like roundup directly on them as a desiccant.
Sugar by itself is not bad. Excessive sugar could cause problems.
i hate these goddamn scores. we have something called a "Nutri-Score" on some shit here in germany now (idk if its anywhere else tbh) and it goes from A to E, A being the "best". Some of the absolute BS that gets an A there is absolutely outrageous. like i think i saw some kinda chips or chocolate or something with C or above and some SALAD, FRIGGIN SALAD with something below C.
Alana the thing is Asia and Europe don’t eat cereal for breakfast
I'm so glad I went keto/carnivore over 10 years ago. Beef is king!
If it tastes good, it's bad for you. Life is supposed to suck or you're unhealthy.
I FUCKING LOVE popcorn. Seeing this inverted ass graph scares me now.
Just eat cornflakes with milk if you want like the most technically healthy cereal ,idk what some parents think when they permanently feed their kids every single sugary cereal and drinks.
Literally whenever I go shopping I only shop in 2-3 ailes because everything else is just so unhealthy and terrible for your health. That's the shithole we live in.
I was eating a cup of cereal in water while watching this; thanks for the info, and have a great day! 🥰😍🤩😍🥰
by the looks of it, seems like the compass is not wrong, but rigged. It basically looks at the food in a vacuum, and based on some arbitrary, somewhat reasonably human nutritional needs, gives that food score. The reason, why some cereal are ranked so high, is because they have lots of added nutrients and vitamins in them, so on paper they have high nutrient per kcal. On the other hand, foods that have lots of one nutrient, like egg white omelet, will score really poorly, coz they have little to none other nutrient or vitamins, that having some sides like meat or vegetables would fix, but are not included in paper. Additionally, ranking is based on needs, not comparable healthiness of foods. spinach, and lots of other veges, have a score of 100, only 3 more then Cereal (Uncle Sam), not because it has 97% of spinach nutrients, but from spinach having so much of them, that its score would be like 600, but the limit is 100. In conclusion, Bad scoring, possible malicious intent, rest of the paper looks fine, most of categories looks ok, just grains are sus. Don't eat to much grains. Its bad for you. In big amounts. Just like 99% of foods
That's why I eat 2 hash browns for breakfast a day because at least its better than cereal
8 mins ago? Earliest I've ever gotten to one of your videos
So glad that I'm actively being poisoned😌
Anything coming out of Sociology for the past 20 years can go straight into the trash.
Corporations exist to maximize profit. They don't belong in your kitchen.
There are different types of sugar theres brown sugar, ultra processed white table sugar (not healthy), and there is pure sugarcane sugar which is actually healthy for you where as the other 2 are not
Hey Alana, have you ever watched a movie named Idiocracy? I think you'd enjoy it.
Egg and cheese sandwich is pretty good for breakfast.
bruh that one guy was coping hard, in europe usually american brands adapt to the regulations yes but if the brand don't/cant they are banned. So yes, comparing what they have in the us and in europe it's the same thing but sometimes comparatively less, when taking in account that they put as much as they can it cancels out
Just went and had a look at a box of kelloggs (gluten free) cornflakes (in New Zealand, though I doubt they're much different elsewhere). By mass, it's 8.2% sugar. It straight up Says this on the front of the box (in the form of 'contains X per 100 grams) next to it's health star rating... and to be fair, at 3.5 out of 5, that's not a Terrible rating (though note that that rating includes energy, saturated fats, sodium content, iron content, and probably other stuff as well). It's also specifically FODMAP friendly (that is, there are people such as myself who have problems digesting certain sugars, similar to being lactose intollerant, and have to be careful of our intake, the sugar in these cornflakes is all of the sorts that aren't an issue.)
The suggested serving size is 35g. You're right that no one actually only eats 35g of cerial (though cornflakes are one of those that they're More likely to manage that with, due to how of the volume of a serving ends up being air, that still only gets you so far). one box is 270g. Because of course it's not a round number of servings (Very slightly over 7.7 servings per box).
That said, my usual practice is to dump the box's contents into a container then add rolled oats, various seeds, and some dried fruit to it to make a museli, though of course the fruit adds More sugar (the edible parts of most fruits are mostly sugars and water, after all), and the result is still mostly cornflakes by volume. I then add stewed rubarb... which, of course, brings even More sugar with it, because the stewing process involves a fair bit of sugar (it changes the flavour, but is primarily a preserving process). Then I basically drown the whole thing in oat milk.
So... on balance I'm probably ingesting more sugar in a meal than I would be if I was just eating straight cornflakes, but with a much greater amount of Other nutrients coming along for the ride than I would be getting if cornflakes were all I ate. After all, the base cornflakes are 80.7% carbohydrates (of which the sugar is a subset).
Though the cornflakes do have this going for them: They're easy on the stomach if you're sick.
Kellogs cornflakes offered in GB Tesco are 8% sugar by mass while the Kellogg’s cornflakes offered in US walmart are 9.52% sugar by mass
Some other comments bring it up but there is a noticable difference in the amount of sugar and fat in EU due to strict regaulations (sugary and fat products are still to regulate a lot obvs) but most importantly there are a lot of stuff wich don’t show up in nutritional values but in the ingredients such as food additives like coloring, flavor enhencers, preservatives etc, there are some wich aren’t banned in europe and do we have some in most non-fresh/long lasting products but A LOT of the US ones are banned
Also there are far more (but not quite enough) regulations on pesticides/antifungi/chemical intrants than in US agriculture
Can we start calling Ground Beef "Scrambled Beef"? On a serious note though this reminds me of the Sugar industry hating on Fat for money in like the 80's and 90's. Wonder if the video is basically talking about that as I'm only a few minutes in.
Ah so it's just another case of that. Awesome lmao love to see it.
Oats are bad for you too because they are carbs and those turn into sugar in the body. And you have to add your own sweetener like honey anyways. You are much better off with eggs and bacon, and beef products if they are all pasture raised.
2nd comment on processed foods. I dont think processed foods are necessarily bad by default. What processed foods to, however, is make calories more available in the food, and this will not be reflected in the nutrition facts, so you could be eating far more calories than what is advertised.
Celery for example has 6 calories uncooked, and 30 calories cooked, which is a 5x increase. Its not that the celery gains calories, they were always there, but your body can absorb more calories from the celery that is cooked, because it takes so much less energy to digest.
So flour for example increased the availability of calories in wheat. Bread increases the availability of calories in flour. Granulated white sugar has more available calories than real maple syrup or honey. This doesn't mean maple is good for you though. It simply means that the calories a lot of people consume from processed foods realistically ends up being much higher than less processed or unprocessed foods because the availability of those calories is much greater.
The other thing that I think is scary is that global warming is reducing the nutrition in food globally, as this makes people more hungry even if they think they are eating healthy, and so overconsumption is also happening as a result of increased carbon levels causing plants to grow larger, but less nutritious, and this trickles into all food everywhere globally.
I can't talk for every european country, but I can say that in Germany all american products (which are allowed to be sold) are watered down versions with less sugar, like for example Mountain Dew or Monster Energy. The same goes for those US cereal brands. It is still unhealty, but not as bad as the original US versison.
Not even looking that up, there is no way Mountain dew has even more sugar in the US, that stuff is the most sugar-rich Soda you can get in Germany.
Also there is plenty of cereal thats just oats, seeds and flakes that tastes fine with just the milk.
@@2aneI mean this is the US where they have to have massive cups for drinks.
@@2aneit does
I, uh.... has someone kidnapped these researchers and they published this study from gunpoint? only way it would make sense to me
Human diet has literally been 90% some kinda grain, and whatever else you could find, grow, or scrounge up. This reminds me of when tobacco companies paid universities to publish papers about the health benefits of smoking.
this is why i eat corn flakes with no milk there is 4 g of sugar in one and a half cups of cornflakes that isn’t that bad and i don’t eat it every day
literally the only thing on that goddamn junk food snack food chart that was accurate was air popped unbuttered popcorn that stuff is fine because it’s just heated corn kernels
Yep the wall-E movie is going to happen with shit like this happening in the world its pretty much guaranteed to happen in the future.
Frosted Mini-Wheats are like 20% sugar, so no they're not healthy for you.
My braim is so rotten from pcm memes that i immediately think of funny colored squares i soon as I saw the word compass
if eggs were bad for you I would be dead. Period.
I think their brains are turned upside down when making the chart lol.
yeah, I contest this. Eating whole eggs is fine. You can overeat litterally anything, so for most people eating 20 eggs a day is not good, but Eggs are great, and butter is fine in moderation. There is no point to trying to "pennypinch" fats by substituting them with "lighter" fats like trying to replace butter with margerine, which I think is in general just worse for you, both in taste, and long term since butter has more satiety than margerine does, can come in unsalted variety, and is free of trans fats.
When it comes to weight and obesity, its not even that carbs are the issue, it is excessive carbs, since carbs tend to be calorically dense, and frequently combined with sugar and fats, and it is the triple threat that is the worst. Donuts for example are carbs + sugar + fats which is why they make you fat, whereas eating rice, a staple food in asia, doesn't make people fat, unless they simply eat far too much overall.
I am a firm believer that the best diets are diverse, and moderate, meaning quantity is moderate, and full fat foods are fine. This means its fine to eat bacon, drink whole milk, put butter on your steak, but the total quantity of what you eat should not be excessive, and you shouldn't eat the same thing for every meal. This means maybe you aren't eating bacon 3x per day, and broccoli zero times.
Also I don't know who slandered egg yolks, but yolks are fine to eat. They are natures gravy. eating 2-3 eggs for breakfast is 100% fine, and you can cook them in butter, and have coffee, and toast, and you will not be fat from this. People have eaten this for a hundred years, and only got fat once more desk jobs, less house wives, and quick sugar+carb+fat combos got added to everything.
wait.. I thought honey bunches of oats and raisin bran were like.. the "healthier" cereals. like instead of reeses puffs and froot loops and captin crunch or whatever. I mean, normal foods like chicken and vegetables are obviously healthier for people than any cereal.
Milk; the most nutritious drink you can ever imagine, is to be moderated.
I'm starting to think the scientist were lactose intolerant.
Also wtf is a MEATLESS CHICKEN ?
Eeeey, it's Megasus!
no one actually eats one fourth a cup of cereal. unless you require so little to function
Why is there only one quality on this video?!
This food compass crap is such BS, I’m now over at the Chinese place near my work to specifically get stuff they tell me I shouldn’t have.
Plus, because I can get actual veggies, it’s healthier than a free pizza from my employer every shift.
To be fair to the popcorn, it is low calorie snack. ~30 calories per cup +what ever calories from your toppings (butter/oil).
If you binge ate 10 cups of popcorn, calorie wise, it is equivalent to eating two cups of potato chips. Lets say you buttered them moderately and now it is 3 cups of chips.
If you are eating simply to eat while doing something else, popcorn is likely one of your better options because it is so hard to over consume calories with it. The biggest downside is that those calories aren't necessarily giving you any nutrients that you need.
depends if it has added salt, sugar or if its just bland, you can add protein to it too
@@lightzpy8049 You bring up a good point you can easily add a lot of your own extras to it based in what you need
Lmaao no, the EU DOESN'T have the same amount of sugar in their food.
A lot of American products are completely banned for this reason and for using a lot of chemicals in their processing.
Talk about cope.
Also theres sugar tax...
Here's the real thing no one wants you to know... Everyone is different. There is no real guidance you should listen to other than the pediatrician taking your blood levels and stuff. That's it. Some people... Cereal is good for them because they need calories and will burn them. Other people... Need lean turkey. It's all relative.
Nobody needs high fructose corn syrup or partially hydrogenated seed oils in their diet.
I eat things you would eat for lunch or dinner for breakfast
I mean, mini-wheats got a good bit of sugar but it made easy work of fixing my fiber problem.
Rest of that chat I can't argue is clearly pretty stupid tho LOL
take the stuff at the top and switch it with the stuff at the bottom, there you will have your truth
9:29 Remember, Dora The Explorer in moderation people. 😂
Any thoughts on Magic Spoons cereal?
Trust the $cience.
My niece came to my house and complained i have no food. I only buy ingredients then make whatever i need from scratch, It's sad my sister just gives her a card and lets her order doordash whenever shes hungry
Butt why do they hate egg in butter. I guess they added the butter to make it unhealthy
The study is very skewed since it counts the amount of different nutrients rather than the amount of each nutrient individually. This is how cereals with negligible amounts of several vitamins can rank higher than meats, eggs, and milk.
I'm honestly way less worried about the sugar than I am about the corn syrup. It turns out that corn is actually really not good for human consumption, and in the US we have it in EVERYTHING. (he says through a mouthfull of corn flakes)
For reference, the whole reason for using corn syrup is that it is sugar... but cheaper. Of course, the human body can get very picky about not just the quantity of sugar, but also the Type. Turns out, Fructos (pretend I'm spelling that correctly, I have no idea) and Glucos (again, spelling) in roughly equivalent amounts? Your body has a much easier time dealing with that than it does the same total of sugar that's all fructos. Of course, for most people this is still within tollerances so the difference doesn't matter, but if you have certain health issues to start with it becomes very noticeable.
@@laurencefraserCorn is cheaper because it's heavily subsidized by the government for production of fuel ethanol, which is also why our gasoline goes bad.
Also, sugars mostly get processed by the pancreas. Except corn syrup, which gets processed by the *liver and kidneys.*
This is such a paid for psyop that it's crazy
Like right away you’re wrong about the degree of the issue. Processed foods are changed internationally to account for different standards. It’s why European Heinz ketchup and coke have less calories than the American versions; the eu literally bans putting as much sugar and syrup as the American version. The European versions aren’t good, but the American is worst. There’s also laws about the artificial colorings and preservatives used, so the formulas are different in other ways. A lot of American breakfast cereals are also just banned from normal sale (though you can special order from America like those Japanese snack boxes do from Japan, but this makes one box like 12€).
Like when you travel, you probably just noticed the stuff tastes largely the same, but don’t look hard at nutrition and ingredients labels. Why would most people? Even McDonald’s alters their recipes for different markets.
No way. American soda are disgustingly sweet. Nowadays they put artificial sugar on top of high fructose corn syrups. I don't know how Americans can drink that stuff.
please tell me this is only in america and not in europe
bruh, goes to show how money can buy out even morals and ethics smh.
ayo what's with 11:20 why is "Dora The Explorer" listed
l love pegasus
Doesn’t eu have a sugar tax so something?
Still ginna eat all these. Im already gonna die, so why not speed up the process so i can be lowered into my grave that much faster?
meatless meat is plant based foods aka vegan foods
Niw i so confused about food what good and bad.... because im in hospital doctor talk other patients say cheese bad
Good but too much salt. If you are in Asia most people are lactose intolerant so that's bad too.
Money talks the movie