My second gen qd oled is to bright already, i use him at max 85% at day. Dont know what u guys want, playing in the garden with direct sunlight on it, okey seems not bad.
ill never understand how people want "brighter" still... i finally joined the OLED world recenetly and got an ASUS pg32udcm and i have to lower the brightness so much or my eyes feel like they are burning lmao
not everyone uses their monitor in a dark room 24/7. 250 nits is not even bright enough for SDR, even the cheapest $100 LCD can get brighter than that. And you need higher brightness for HDR (1000 nits). OLEDs suck for HDR content. People like you are saying "its bright enough" to justify spending $1000 on a monitor that is dimmer than a $100 LCD lol. Its not anywhere near bright enough.
@@theendurance why would i need to "justify" spending 1k like thats alot of money? lol you sound mad im sorry you cant afford a 1k monitor, im enjoying it a ton though thanks for your concern
@@theendurance OLED’s suck for HDR? Everything i’ve searched for on the internet says OLEDs are the best panel for HDR due to the infinite contrast. Personally i think the brightness is just fine on my pg27aqdm, i run it at 17 brightness and never have trouble seeing anything even in Extreme daylight. Peaks at about 900 nits in HDR.
@@ployth9000why do you want 8K you won't notice the difference with 4K at all. The pixels per inch are already pretty high to make a visual difference
Respectfully as someone with a 7900 XTX and 9800x3d my LG 240/480hz 4k/1080p dual mode monitor is overkill and 480hz at 4k is literally unusable outside of Minecraft.
Those lg oled improvements don't sound that big. Was really hoping for 240hz. The brightness gain could be great tho the G4 is very bright, while their could be exponential brightness gains the benefit of higher brightness is a diminishing return at this point. Would rather an LG qdoled with 240hz
Higher brightness doesnt just mean peak white at 1% window Especially if they are incorporating pholed. It means punchy saturated colors as well. This is a huge upgrade. I already saw the massive reduction in energy posted officially, they will be increasing brightness while decreasing power consumption at the same time and that means they also have much longer longevity/ much less burn in potential
@eliashabash7591 i wouldn't expect large gains in color luminance. Just look at c4 vs g4. G4 has much higher brightness, slightly worse dcip3 coverage and only slightly better color luminance
@@SKLLZTHATKILLZ it depends how they are getting the brightness though. With mla, the ratio of white to color is actually exasperated since white is already so much brighter in the first place while providing minimal increase to rgb. With the additional layer, i assume based off my readings that they will be able to push colors much more
Multi Layer OLED also presents the possibility of incredibly upgraded HARDWARE (No added latency) BFI. By only activating 2 layers active at once, going at 50% brightness each equalling 1 Panel's Brightness. The other 2 Disabled. Then the next frame they swap. Group 1 on, Group 2 off -> Group 2 on, group 1 off repeated for each frame. FINALLY ULTIMATE MOTION CLARITY WITHOUT SAMPLE AND HOLD BLUR!!!
Why do we keep talking about brightness with lg oled when the only thing that gets brighter is the white light so the brighter it gets the more washed out the colors get. Qd oled is the better tech since all colors get brighter.
That's funny, I actually already have the 2028 model. It's clear when its off and you can set it to only be visible to you so it doesn't bother anyone else. The next etherware update will make it omnipresent.
I read somewhere the 144hz doesn’t perform all that great when really tasked. It was their opinion that the 165hz will give 144 hz content more headroom and perform much better! 🎉
I can see individual frames still at 240hz when I pan the camera fast. The blur reduction from 144hz to 240hz is the biggest difference though but you can absolutely get a benefit from even more than 240hz. Sample and hold displays benefit greatly from higher frames
The Monitor/Tv in the beginning of the Video is the LG Oled Flex "42" right? Man I wish that thing would be cheaper AND actually for sale in Germany... What I want is a glossy or semi glossy (the thing between glossy and matte) 42 inch WOLED MONITOR....like the Asus PG42UQ but in glossy.
I think OLED needs to get cheaper honestly. I've seen some insane snags from ppl on reddit and what not but, It would be nice if OLED cost could drop down some, opening the market up to more individuals.
Dang, I'm running an LG C2 65 inch as my main and then two 24 inch dells on each side. I'm about to move my LG to the other side of the room for use with my couch and reunion with my Series X and replace it with a 32 inch 4K dual mode. But now I'm torn on whether I should wait a month or two.
yeah we need improved brightness across the board. I looked at the Asus PDU32 and the lack of brightness relative to LCD is noticeable. Probably a couple years before these are affordable enough
They are taking about HDR 'highlights and color depth lol 💀 not full frame brightness, just the difference between shadows, objects that are directly lit and specular highlights (like the sun highlights bouncing off a car body or on the peaks of waves on the ocean) think of the colour depth like 3D depth--kinda 😂
Im gonna feel pretty bad about buying a c4 if in a few months the c5 is twice as bright, anti reflective, and 165hz. Wonder if I should just return it.
They most likely will not use UHBR20, despite needing the extra bandwidth to reach 4k 480hz with at the very least 8 bit coloring (119.44 Gbps), and if these use 10 bit (143.33 Gbps), or 12 bit (167.22 Gbps), they'd need 2 DP 2.1 80Gbps cables just get enough bandwidth. But no, they'll go the cheap route and use DP 2.1 UHBR 13.5, while the rest will be achieved with DSC
@Yoogaki My reasoning is if they can produce 32" 240hz panel it shouldn't cost much more to make bigger ones and should be doable.. but many factors come into play so maybe I'm just too optimistic
The fact that they put MLA on 27 inch 1440p monitor proves its definitely doable, so its probavly 5o make them cheaper and not compete with the G series. Now, the better question would be why not make 42 and 48 G series.
Thanks for sharing such valuable information! I have a quick question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?
@SKLLZTHATKILLZ Bigger is always better when it comes to OLED and this allows one to set an ultrawide resolution on a MASSIVE scale. Ultrawide is better than 16:9 in my opinion. Do you use NVIDIA control panel and use custom ultrawide resolutions too?
@@productprospectives only tested it once but something was off with the res when I did it. Gonna try again and see now that you mention it. Was starting to look at monitors like the g9. Curious what will be announced at CEO’s
And then you play a game of max 60fps on your new Console Absolute pointless hz for a TV max 165 no need for further more when the console can’t even reach that much
I love my c1 and for the people find out about lg oleds being awesome late, im sorry you didn't get a QD-OLED. Btw my c1 55 was 750$ and guess what. It's worth that. Because it's blue af without calibration. Moving forward. I don't recommend WOLED. If you have to. Get a sony. WOLED push white and blue natural. Just how the display technology works. Just get a woled sony and not lg. That's if you have to get a WOLED
Probably because he clickbaits a 4k480hz panel in the thumbnail (I clicked on this knowing it wouldn't exist though). And he talks about 85% brightness boosts in one generation like a dummy when the panels should be 25% brighter. He is trying to compare legit reviewed brightness on calibrated panels (Current panels get 2000 nits) to marketing brightness on the new panels (3700 nits) the current panels out today were marketed at 3000 nits with an absurd whitepoint by LG but can only actually do a real 2000 nits and the new panels will be marketed at 3700 nits but only able to hit around 2500 nits with a correctly calibrated d65 whitepoint.
Who cares about these shitty efficiency and (superfluous at this point) brightness gains. Make an affordable 98inch+ OLED or there is no mass market hope for this legendary technology FFS…
Sorry but not sorry. Just funny how lg all the way up to c4 and telling people year after year it's brighter. If you actually fallow lg oleds. You would know evo panels are only 10% brighter than none evo panels. The reason why the c4 or c3 has more depth is because they Calibrated the grayscale better. Making you think the tv panel is brighter. The new foc helps in the tvs. A c1 could look like a c4 if lg was to let us download the software. Btw c1 is way different grayscale than the c2. The c2 doesn't black crush everything. I have seen the c3 in bestbuy so many times. It has more of the 3d effect. Only because of better *(pre-calibration)*
@@Lagann0more frames than that, lol. 60fps is, typically, light work for a 4090. Honestly Max out most games and achieve anywhere from 90-600 obviously depending on the game. Wukong is a lil diff tho lol. And these are native rendering(no scaling) and no frame gen btw
i just want a flippin 1080p oled at 240hz and hopefully its not going to be 500$ or just a good 360hz that doesnt have cheap colors and that is at a price of 500$ like zowie
@@ae86409888 i only play games like valorant csgo and fortnite so i dont really need 1440p, i just want a good competitive 1080p monitor but those are at the same price of oleds and im broke so yeah
You can already get 400 dollar 1440p 240hz oleds on sale. Oleds are not going to be much cheaper than 300 no matter what resolution or refresh rate for the forseeable future (next 5 years). They essentially cost double what a ips/VA panel costs to make so look at cheaper high refresh rate lcds and double their price and that is essentially the floor price.Also trust me you don't want a 1080p oled. 1440p text rendering due to the subpixels is rough enough on these oleds. There is not a big enough market for them to make 1080p oleds almost anyone would pay 50$-100$ more for 1440p if they are discerning enough to care about oled image quality.
Same here. I have G9 OLED wich have 400nits max HDR brightness when using amd gpu and some people say its very dim. I have never used it even at max brightness because it would be too damn bright lol.
You are confusing average picture brightness with peak HDR brightness capabilities of a panel. Long story short, higher brightness capabilities will allow the panel to show more detail with HDR videos. Lower brightness capability = clipping = loss of detail A 10000nit will not pop your eyes out unless that is what is intended by the creator! :D For example, a high brightness panel will be able to show the sun with all the details around it. but a low brightness panel will just show a circle of light. (Or it will dim the sun to be able to show the details.)
first of all OLEDs dont even get bright enough for SDR. Good SDR brightness is around 400 nits. But for HDR you need 1000 nits. OLEDs max out at 250/300 nits. So they arent even close to being good for HDR. Perfect blacks mean nothing if the highlights are dim af. My mini LED (which can do 1000 nits fullscreen) looks mesmerizing in HDR while my OLED looks dim and dull.
Thank you to Ruipro for sponsoring this video!
Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (6FT): amzn.to/3wvHB7j
Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (25FT): amzn.to/432NDGS
Buy Ruipro Cables: ruipro.store/displayguy
Best Monitor Settings Here (Guides & Discord): patreon.com/TheDisplayGuy
Source
2025 LG OLEDs: www.flatpanelshd.com/news.php?subaction=showfull&id=1735284218
next year you will have another oled of your dreams. and the year after.
The dude makes a 7 min video out of 2 reddit posts he saw. Well done.
fr, listning to him talk and realizing he just repeats the same thing with different wording every sentence 💀💀
Hahahahhha so true I got baited too
Do you have source so I can read the comments of that post instead? Better than watching a video if it's all just the same lol
yeah his videos are garbage, i just go straight to the comment section. im not even subbed to him lol
I bet you’ll still say it’s not bright enough, just as you’ve done all year
lol the vids of this dude are kinda weird and the titles too, I dont follow him but from what little I have seen its just pure baiting for views.
My second gen qd oled is to bright already, i use him at max 85% at day. Dont know what u guys want, playing in the garden with direct sunlight on it, okey seems not bad.
Yes it won’t be bright enough. Probably we need 20,000nits or more.
@@thedisplayguy 20k or gtfo
@@thedisplayguyYour eyes would like to say otherwise.
Wish most of us could afford them! $500 budget Oled would be VERY helpful.
I make $300 a week. I have 2 OLED TV's and 3 OLED monitors. You are doing something wrong
@@50CalSwag_ We all have our own set of priorities. Like... eating and staying warm is important for me. Thanks for your input though.
@@acdyman msi recently had a deal for a 27 inch monitor with 240hz 1440p oled for exactly $500 without tax. At least here in cali on online shops
They pretty much are already $500USD...
@@coreytaylor7367 yeah but not 27" 4k what most people are waiting for
ill never understand how people want "brighter" still... i finally joined the OLED world recenetly and got an ASUS pg32udcm and i have to lower the brightness so much or my eyes feel like they are burning lmao
Yeah. Even contrast needs to be turned down in some cases. What we need now are new 32" 4K240 OLED monitors that are under $350. lol
not everyone uses their monitor in a dark room 24/7. 250 nits is not even bright enough for SDR, even the cheapest $100 LCD can get brighter than that. And you need higher brightness for HDR (1000 nits). OLEDs suck for HDR content. People like you are saying "its bright enough" to justify spending $1000 on a monitor that is dimmer than a $100 LCD lol. Its not anywhere near bright enough.
Because brightness increases HDR impact. If you don't understand that, then you've much to learn.
@@theendurance why would i need to "justify" spending 1k like thats alot of money? lol you sound mad im sorry you cant afford a 1k monitor, im enjoying it a ton though thanks for your concern
@@theendurance OLED’s suck for HDR? Everything i’ve searched for on the internet says OLEDs are the best panel for HDR due to the infinite contrast. Personally i think the brightness is just fine on my pg27aqdm, i run it at 17 brightness and never have trouble seeing anything even in Extreme daylight. Peaks at about 900 nits in HDR.
LG C5 with 165hz+ and 25%+ brightness might be worth upgrading from my C2. Higher hz and higher brightness are the 2 things I want the most.
Love my C2. Might upgrade and put the "old" C2 and put it in the bedroom.
waiting on 8k oled at $3000 or less
@@ployth9000 + 240hz
The 42” c2 is already extremely bright though lol, unless you’re talking about 55” and up then just g series.
@@ployth9000why do you want 8K you won't notice the difference with 4K at all. The pixels per inch are already pretty high to make a visual difference
Hope the 45" OLED 4K Curved has the bend feature of the other LG screen, thus we can flat it if needed.
Would be a nice combination of both.
But I need and want 55 inches at least for my sofa PC gaming!
Text clarity, resolution is what we need. 34":ish but not 1440p
would an LG c4 be cheaper in a month or two once the c5 is out or should I just buy it now
didn't talk about 4k 480hz at all
Because its unrealistic.
@@aw15czhHe15cZ you would be laughed out of the room for saying such things in 2004, but this is the roaring 20's, tech is dead
@@aw15czhHe15cZhe has it in the thumbnail
Respectfully as someone with a 7900 XTX and 9800x3d my LG 240/480hz 4k/1080p dual mode monitor is overkill and 480hz at 4k is literally unusable outside of Minecraft.
average clickbait
Those lg oled improvements don't sound that big. Was really hoping for 240hz. The brightness gain could be great tho the G4 is very bright, while their could be exponential brightness gains the benefit of higher brightness is a diminishing return at this point. Would rather an LG qdoled with 240hz
I doubt LG will ever venture into QD for their OLEDS. I also wish they would tho.
No thanks on qdoled, I want traditional RGB layout over all right now
Higher brightness doesnt just mean peak white at 1% window
Especially if they are incorporating pholed. It means punchy saturated colors as well. This is a huge upgrade. I already saw the massive reduction in energy posted officially, they will be increasing brightness while decreasing power consumption at the same time and that means they also have much longer longevity/ much less burn in potential
@eliashabash7591 i wouldn't expect large gains in color luminance. Just look at c4 vs g4. G4 has much higher brightness, slightly worse dcip3 coverage and only slightly better color luminance
@@SKLLZTHATKILLZ it depends how they are getting the brightness though. With mla, the ratio of white to color is actually exasperated since white is already so much brighter in the first place while providing minimal increase to rgb. With the additional layer, i assume based off my readings that they will be able to push colors much more
Multi Layer OLED also presents the possibility of incredibly upgraded HARDWARE (No added latency) BFI. By only activating 2 layers active at once, going at 50% brightness each equalling 1 Panel's Brightness. The other 2 Disabled. Then the next frame they swap. Group 1 on, Group 2 off -> Group 2 on, group 1 off repeated for each frame. FINALLY ULTIMATE MOTION CLARITY WITHOUT SAMPLE AND HOLD BLUR!!!
Still waiting for a Gen 3 QD-OLED monitor in 21:9 instead of 16:9...
Hope the 42 inches get a QD OLED panel, will be perfect
I get asus oled glossy pc monitor 27 inch, and this is the best pc monitor I ever had. i don't care if it's 1440p or 4k
for me 4k is much better for productivity. In games I don't care that much
im just wanting to hear the lg dual mode monitor is switching to glossy over matte lol
i just gotta say. i have a qd-oled from msi and i never noticed this supposed magenta problem that you speak about.
Hi, A question.
When 4k Ultra wide 360/480hz OLED? ( no dual mode )
We don’t know. CES 2025 is in a few days, maybe we’ll get info on monitors with specs closer to 4K 480Hz
Probably 2-3 years
@rommelrommel1 sad
I’m waiting for 2026 and LG’s promised 39” 5K2K OLED to replace my 40WP95.
Why do we keep talking about brightness with lg oled when the only thing that gets brighter is the white light so the brighter it gets the more washed out the colors get. Qd oled is the better tech since all colors get brighter.
Because if toi don’t need the highest possible, then there is more coulours left aka less white.
Only reason I’m looking forward to this is the price drop on the G4 😅
Maybe one day they'll be 1/4 as bright as miniled
probably never. OLED TVs have been popular for a decade now and they still cant get more than a measly 300 nits. don't hold your breath.
That's funny, I actually already have the 2028 model. It's clear when its off and you can set it to only be visible to you so it doesn't bother anyone else. The next etherware update will make it omnipresent.
More nits and no more VRR flicker!
VRR flicker is the outstanding issue for me. Already have a G4, and I don't feel like I actually need a brighter TV.
165hz is just a buzz word and for the FOMO crowd more than anything tangible. Most people already don't play at 120hz, and the 2024 TVs have 144hz.
165Hz is the sweet spot for online games. It’s a big upgrade.
I read somewhere the 144hz doesn’t perform all that great when really tasked. It was their opinion that the 165hz will give 144 hz content more headroom and perform much better! 🎉
I can see individual frames still at 240hz when I pan the camera fast. The blur reduction from 144hz to 240hz is the biggest difference though but you can absolutely get a benefit from even more than 240hz. Sample and hold displays benefit greatly from higher frames
@@veilmontTV You guys talking about all this meanwhile I'm on my switch sometimes getting 60 and thinking "it's smooth to me"
@thedisplayguy I was hoping that hdmi 2.2 will bring 4k 240hz tvs but we might have to wait a few years.
The Monitor/Tv in the beginning of the Video is the LG Oled Flex "42" right?
Man I wish that thing would be cheaper AND actually for sale in Germany...
What I want is a glossy or semi glossy (the thing between glossy and matte) 42 inch WOLED MONITOR....like the Asus PG42UQ but in glossy.
I think OLED needs to get cheaper honestly. I've seen some insane snags from ppl on reddit and what not but, It would be nice if OLED cost could drop down some, opening the market up to more individuals.
Wait for those chinese oleds in monitors!
If anyones gonna buy a monitor i recommend LG. its a great company I’ve had Asus monitors and i have had nothing but complaints.I swear by LG
I just want a 42 inch qd oled with s90/s90c etc brightness
Dang, I'm running an LG C2 65 inch as my main and then two 24 inch dells on each side. I'm about to move my LG to the other side of the room for use with my couch and reunion with my Series X and replace it with a 32 inch 4K dual mode. But now I'm torn on whether I should wait a month or two.
Wish they would focus on 24p motion
Just skimmed their article.. thanks for doing this video!! 🎉
6 mins of yapping fyi
Yes, and the headlines for videos like that too. Tell me you're paid without telling me you're paid.
yeah we need improved brightness across the board. I looked at the Asus PDU32 and the lack of brightness relative to LCD is noticeable. Probably a couple years before these are affordable enough
Can't wait for the trianglular subpixel layout and horrible PWM flicker.
For real why is Samsung still doing that, just do standard lines or square dot setup
It's a television, not a monitor.
Different subpixel layouts for different purposes.
@@tim3172 ??? Subpixel layout has nothing to do with the purpose it will be used for - it's just a design decision.
Holding out for the 16 stack OLEDs 🤔
Can't make a bad/premature purchase if you never buy anything... hmm...
When do you plan to publish Dough Spectrum Blacks review?
Spoiler: they will still be too expensive and suffer from burn in
I just want a 5k ultrawide 39 34 inch end game at that point
Are these people asking for more brightness living on the Sun? My old LG monitor gets my eyes bleeding if I go higher than 50%.
They are taking about HDR 'highlights and color depth lol 💀 not full frame brightness, just the difference between shadows, objects that are directly lit and specular highlights (like the sun highlights bouncing off a car body or on the peaks of waves on the ocean) think of the colour depth like 3D depth--kinda 😂
@ Ah, right right. Thanks for the info, Chief!
What viewing angles problem are you talking about bro.
Fake news
The off-axis WOLED tinting is very much a real issue. This is true even for perfectly on axis viewing when using smaller panels as monitors.
Hell yes an LG 32" or 38" ultrawide 4K glossy screen with a 1000R 240hz please
Im gonna feel pretty bad about buying a c4 if in a few months the c5 is twice as bright, anti reflective, and 165hz. Wonder if I should just return it.
The menu in that initial video said "OLED Motion Pro". Is this returning? That would be huge!
They most likely will not use UHBR20, despite needing the extra bandwidth to reach 4k 480hz with at the very least 8 bit coloring (119.44 Gbps), and if these use 10 bit (143.33 Gbps), or 12 bit (167.22 Gbps), they'd need 2 DP 2.1 80Gbps cables just get enough bandwidth. But no, they'll go the cheap route and use DP 2.1 UHBR 13.5, while the rest will be achieved with DSC
this is the news i was waiting for because i want to pair the 5090 with a 4k qd oled higher hrtz than whats already available
Just got my c4 last night happy with it for now…
Only 165 while 4k PC monitors are at 240 since a while ? psh they got some catching up to do
Do you expect monitor performance as tv?
@Yoogaki My reasoning is if they can produce 32" 240hz panel it shouldn't cost much more to make bigger ones and should be doable.. but many factors come into play so maybe I'm just too optimistic
Why would you want A tv hub in a monitor?
Can someone explain why only 55,65,77,83-inch TVs have mla/qd-oled technology, while 42/48-inch TVs only have woled ?
The fact that they put MLA on 27 inch 1440p monitor proves its definitely doable, so its probavly 5o make them cheaper and not compete with the G series. Now, the better question would be why not make 42 and 48 G series.
Yeah! The price!
I want 27 matt woled monitor with perfect text clarity.
Thanks for sharing such valuable information! I have a quick question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?
What about the sub pixel layer?
I want 240Hz LG G5
@@productprospectives in 42 inch size
@SKLLZTHATKILLZ Bigger is always better when it comes to OLED and this allows one to set an ultrawide resolution on a MASSIVE scale. Ultrawide is better than 16:9 in my opinion.
Do you use NVIDIA control panel and use custom ultrawide resolutions too?
@@productprospectives only tested it once but something was off with the res when I did it. Gonna try again and see now that you mention it. Was starting to look at monitors like the g9. Curious what will be announced at CEO’s
@@SKLLZTHATKILLZ When you set it to cinema 4K (4096x2160) are there any scaling issues?
Does the screen actually have 4096 pixels horizontally?
And then you play a game of max 60fps on your new Console
Absolute pointless hz for a TV max 165 no need for further more when the console can’t even reach that much
I am hoping oled tvs will come with hdmi 2.2 at 4k 240hz. at 48 inches and higher brightness.
I love my c1 and for the people find out about lg oleds being awesome late, im sorry you didn't get a QD-OLED. Btw my c1 55 was 750$ and guess what. It's worth that. Because it's blue af without calibration. Moving forward. I don't recommend WOLED. If you have to. Get a sony. WOLED push white and blue natural. Just how the display technology works. Just get a woled sony and not lg. That's if you have to get a WOLED
whys the like ratio bad
Probably because he clickbaits a 4k480hz panel in the thumbnail (I clicked on this knowing it wouldn't exist though). And he talks about 85% brightness boosts in one generation like a dummy when the panels should be 25% brighter. He is trying to compare legit reviewed brightness on calibrated panels (Current panels get 2000 nits) to marketing brightness on the new panels (3700 nits) the current panels out today were marketed at 3000 nits with an absurd whitepoint by LG but can only actually do a real 2000 nits and the new panels will be marketed at 3700 nits but only able to hit around 2500 nits with a correctly calibrated d65 whitepoint.
I want 48 inch models…
Who cares about these shitty efficiency and (superfluous at this point) brightness gains. Make an affordable 98inch+ OLED or there is no mass market hope for this legendary technology FFS…
when 4k ultrawide oled
Sub 300 oled via the last quarter of this year. I don't care about the "unreadable" 1st gen since I grew up on rbg subpixel crt monitors.
Thumbs up!
I want a monitor that has g5 levels brightness.
2050?
Maybe…
Plz LG if you read this make a 39 inch UWQHD 360 hz with BFI plz il give you all my money
im hoping for samsung odyssey g9 57 QD-oled 2026 or 2029
LG C5 165hz
this dude is all about click baits, nothing new.
Sorry but not sorry. Just funny how lg all the way up to c4 and telling people year after year it's brighter. If you actually fallow lg oleds. You would know evo panels are only 10% brighter than none evo panels. The reason why the c4 or c3 has more depth is because they Calibrated the grayscale better. Making you think the tv panel is brighter. The new foc helps in the tvs. A c1 could look like a c4 if lg was to let us download the software. Btw c1 is way different grayscale than the c2. The c2 doesn't black crush everything. I have seen the c3 in bestbuy so many times. It has more of the 3d effect. Only because of better *(pre-calibration)*
Seeing people displaying Fortnite as a sample on an advanced monitor is the cringiest Gen Z move. Truly Alt+F4 worthy 😖
where is my MAX OLED boyh
TV tech is advancing too slow the TV's could be running 240hz by now they are just dragging there heals
HDMI 2.2
Yeah, sure, „huge“ upgrades.
Dude, you know pretty much everything you said in this video was incorrect.
165hz 4k g5 is useless if you dont have a pc that can handle 165 fps in 4k
I just got 4k 240hz 😂
dp2.1?
theres not gonna be a 360 or 480 hz monitors released at ces 2025 its just gonna be brighter oled and smaller monitors
@aberkae yep, the gigabyte f.... Pro
@RuneBa1 LG is going to have 2160p ultrawide 45 inch monitor.
@@aberkae sounds good, but I am a big fan of qd-oled and glossy finish
Ces 2025!
Man graphics cards cant run 4k 60hz max settings, sure hope the 5090 is affordable and can push 4k max 120
That GPU going to cost something like 3000 dollars for sure. :D
A 4090 can run nearly every game in 4k 60fps minimum. Only highly unoptimized games you would get less than 60avg.
@@Lagann0more frames than that, lol. 60fps is, typically, light work for a 4090. Honestly Max out most games and achieve anywhere from 90-600 obviously depending on the game. Wukong is a lil diff tho lol. And these are native rendering(no scaling) and no frame gen btw
Yea the 5090 will be rough in Canada. Sure it'll be $3000CAD, maybe more? Hopefully not, or I'm setting up an EBAY store 😬
Is there a way to disable Asians ?
i just want a flippin 1080p oled at 240hz and hopefully its not going to be 500$ or just a good 360hz that doesnt have cheap colors and that is at a price of 500$ like zowie
1080p so old, what's bothering you updating to 1440p?
@@ae86409888 i only play games like valorant csgo and fortnite so i dont really need 1440p, i just want a good competitive 1080p monitor but those are at the same price of oleds and im broke so yeah
@@ae86409888sheep syndrome. But fr OP: OLED monitors are already available at $500USD..
You can already get 400 dollar 1440p 240hz oleds on sale. Oleds are not going to be much cheaper than 300 no matter what resolution or refresh rate for the forseeable future (next 5 years). They essentially cost double what a ips/VA panel costs to make so look at cheaper high refresh rate lcds and double their price and that is essentially the floor price.Also trust me you don't want a 1080p oled. 1440p text rendering due to the subpixels is rough enough on these oleds. There is not a big enough market for them to make 1080p oleds almost anyone would pay 50$-100$ more for 1440p if they are discerning enough to care about oled image quality.
@@Deadpool-se6lq makes sens thank you where did you find a 400$ oled?
Oled ia geh mled the future oled just a dead end
Clickbait ahh video
I don’t understand the point of having high brightness. Are you blind speed running? I don’t understand
Explain like I’m 5
Same here. I have G9 OLED wich have 400nits max HDR brightness when using amd gpu and some people say its very dim. I have never used it even at max brightness because it would be too damn bright lol.
@@AinaDuunis It depends on what scene you are looking at.
You are confusing average picture brightness with peak HDR brightness capabilities of a panel.
Long story short, higher brightness capabilities will allow the panel to show more detail with HDR videos.
Lower brightness capability = clipping = loss of detail
A 10000nit will not pop your eyes out unless that is what is intended by the creator! :D
For example, a high brightness panel will be able to show the sun with all the details around it. but a low brightness panel will just show a circle of light. (Or it will dim the sun to be able to show the details.)
@AinaDuunis 400 nits full screen? Not happening from that tv
first of all OLEDs dont even get bright enough for SDR. Good SDR brightness is around 400 nits. But for HDR you need 1000 nits. OLEDs max out at 250/300 nits. So they arent even close to being good for HDR. Perfect blacks mean nothing if the highlights are dim af. My mini LED (which can do 1000 nits fullscreen) looks mesmerizing in HDR while my OLED looks dim and dull.
I need finally 55 inches 4k@240Hz!!!!