Great conversation! I learned a lot. I’d love to hear more like this. Also, I’m so grateful for the outcome of the Grants Pass case. Southern Oregon (where Grants Pass is located) has such of a homelessness issue now. Actually, all of Oregon does. They sleep in building doorways, in parks, on sidewalks, etc. and many are drug addicted and leave paraphernalia and trash all over. I just read in the news recently that a young girl stepped on a needle in a park and has had to undergo testing for blood-borne diseases (last I heard was that she’s ok). I also know someone who works at a Starbucks and told me they have to call the police every morning because homeless people sleep blocking the doorway into the coffee shop. They also frequently are the cause of fires, because they set fires and they catch surrounding brush and grass on fire. We need to be able to enforce laws for the safety of citizens. I feel bad for people who are homeless, but allowing them to sleep all over and leave behind needles, trash, and the like is harmful for everyone. And we do have shelters and places they could go if they wanted.
Trump is the best President of the last century, no new wars, secure borders, defending religious freedom, good economy, flourished small businesses in all communities. Im voting for Trump.
I think there is a reasonable version of chevron we will eventually return to because the SCOTUS can't resolve the meaning of every single word in every statute that someone decides is ambiguous because reasons. The thing is that even with chevron deference, the fishery thing is objectively unreasonable. I don't think chevron deference ever meant whatever nonsense the executive branch says, but there is some colorable zone of reasonableness that they should be allowed to operate.
This is largely correct. Trying to stay under time limit, it was hard to capture all of that. I agree with you that Chevron didn't give the Executive branch absolute authority to interpret statutes. But it was over broad, and Loper Bright is a great and long sought correction.
Hi Keith: I haven’t listened to you for awhile but wanted to encourage you on this theme. If you want to know the process and legal importance of the Supreme Court you can do a few helpful things: 1. Actually read the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence and the Federalist Papers. 2. Hillsdale College offers an incredible volume of resources through their school on all aspects of SCOTUS and our Constitutional Republic, etc (we are not a democracy). And the good news? They are entirely free of charge. 3. Two men you want to read on these important recent decisions from SCOTUS: -Victor Davis Hanson -Mark Levine Both are scholars on these matters. 3. The Chevron Deference is important and you can read that and any other SCOTUS decisions online. 4. Lastly, this young man is not equipped biblically or theologically for these kinds of discussions though he seems to have a very general knowledge of our government. Otherwise my brother… this discussion should have been better prepared for and approached with greater seriousness considering the times we live in. Most nonbelievers who are familiar with SCOTUS and our government would find this interaction a bit embarrassing. Pray for you weekly. Steve 2 Tim 2:15
A Republic is only one specific type of Democracy. In Representative Democracies (inclusive of both Republics and Constitutional Monarchies), the people vote for representatives to make laws by passing legislation on their behalf, while in Direct Democracies the people make laws by directly voting on individual or near individual pieces of legislation through means such as ballot measures and referenda. They are all collectively known as democracies. The United States is a Democracy, a Republic, or more specifically a Constitutional Democratic Republic. It’s super annoying that a lot of American Political Conservatives and Libertarians don’t know that a republic is just one type of democracy, and calling the United States a democracy is still correct - there are several forms of democracy.
Not sure where you got the idea that Mr Hinson is not equipped to have a biblical or theological debate, he’s literally a church elder and has given sermons…
Great conversation! I learned a lot. I’d love to hear more like this.
Also, I’m so grateful for the outcome of the Grants Pass case. Southern Oregon (where Grants Pass is located) has such of a homelessness issue now. Actually, all of Oregon does.
They sleep in building doorways, in parks, on sidewalks, etc. and many are drug addicted and leave paraphernalia and trash all over. I just read in the news recently that a young girl stepped on a needle in a park and has had to undergo testing for blood-borne diseases (last I heard was that she’s ok).
I also know someone who works at a Starbucks and told me they have to call the police every morning because homeless people sleep blocking the doorway into the coffee shop.
They also frequently are the cause of fires, because they set fires and they catch surrounding brush and grass on fire.
We need to be able to enforce laws for the safety of citizens. I feel bad for people who are homeless, but allowing them to sleep all over and leave behind needles, trash, and the like is harmful for everyone. And we do have shelters and places they could go if they wanted.
Thank you, you helped me understand some things with your illustrations. Godspeed!
Matthew speaks on these topics so well. Great episode. Have you considered breaking these long-form discussions into smaller clips based on topic?
Thank you for your kind words! We could do something like that. Perhaps on another channel?
I would love another discussion with this guest fully explaining the correct uses of the 25th amendment. This has been a great discussion.
Minor clarification: at oral arguments, Trump's lawyer argued that he was immune for official acts only which is what he got essentially.
Love how @11:50, Matthew rephrases his sentence while talking about careful phrasing of sentences.
Gotta practice what we preach! :D
So sorry to hear about your boating accident. I hope you had insurance. 😄
Trump is the best President of the last century, no new wars, secure borders, defending religious freedom, good economy, flourished small businesses in all communities.
Im voting for Trump.
He's better than Biden in this election but there's a long list of better presidents including Eisenhower, JFK, Nixon, ect...
*baby murderer
@@Ezra-k4o ? Biden certainly is more pro-baby murder.
Definitely the best of this century. Actually, there’s no contest this century.
I think there is a reasonable version of chevron we will eventually return to because the SCOTUS can't resolve the meaning of every single word in every statute that someone decides is ambiguous because reasons. The thing is that even with chevron deference, the fishery thing is objectively unreasonable. I don't think chevron deference ever meant whatever nonsense the executive branch says, but there is some colorable zone of reasonableness that they should be allowed to operate.
This is largely correct. Trying to stay under time limit, it was hard to capture all of that. I agree with you that Chevron didn't give the Executive branch absolute authority to interpret statutes. But it was over broad, and Loper Bright is a great and long sought correction.
@20:14 Jaws?
You got it!
Hi Keith:
I haven’t listened to you for awhile but wanted to encourage you on this theme.
If you want to know the process and legal importance of the Supreme Court you can do a few helpful things:
1. Actually read the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence and the Federalist Papers.
2. Hillsdale College offers an incredible volume of resources through their school on all aspects of SCOTUS and our Constitutional Republic, etc (we are not a democracy). And the good news? They are entirely free of charge.
3. Two men you want to read on these important recent decisions from SCOTUS:
-Victor Davis Hanson
-Mark Levine
Both are scholars on these matters.
3. The Chevron Deference is important and you can read that and any other SCOTUS decisions online.
4. Lastly, this young man is not equipped biblically or theologically for these kinds of discussions though he seems to have a very general knowledge of our government.
Otherwise my brother… this discussion should have been better prepared for and approached with greater seriousness considering the times we live in.
Most nonbelievers who are familiar with SCOTUS and our government would find this interaction a bit embarrassing.
Pray for you weekly.
Steve
2 Tim 2:15
A Republic is only one specific type of Democracy. In Representative Democracies (inclusive of both Republics and Constitutional Monarchies), the people vote for representatives to make laws by passing legislation on their behalf, while in Direct Democracies the people make laws by directly voting on individual or near individual pieces of legislation through means such as ballot measures and referenda. They are all collectively known as democracies. The United States is a Democracy, a Republic, or more specifically a Constitutional Democratic Republic. It’s super annoying that a lot of American Political Conservatives and Libertarians don’t know that a republic is just one type of democracy, and calling the United States a democracy is still correct - there are several forms of democracy.
Not sure where you got the idea that Mr Hinson is not equipped to have a biblical or theological debate, he’s literally a church elder and has given sermons…
I'm not reading all that but thanks