The TRUTH About Designer Sunglasses

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 780

  • @latristessdurera8763
    @latristessdurera8763 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1338

    Fun fact. Commercial Pilots are no longer allowed to wear polarised sunglasses. At certain angles the polarisation blanks out the digital screens in the cockpit.

    • @bonniea8189
      @bonniea8189 2 ปีที่แล้ว +86

      Yep, anyone wearing polarized lenses can experience this by looking at their phone and then tilting their head to the side

    • @DustyTheDog
      @DustyTheDog 2 ปีที่แล้ว +67

      @@bonniea8189 this really only works with LCD panels. LED and OLED panels do not pass the light through a polarizing filter, like LCD. I can see my Galaxy S20 FE at any angle outside with my sunglasses. It has an OLED screen.

    • @bonniea8189
      @bonniea8189 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@DustyTheDog Interesting. Yeah I've noticed it with some car console displays and even some gas pump screens

    • @sylvisterling8782
      @sylvisterling8782 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@DustyTheDog I test for polarization when I am sorting glasses, by holding the glasses up to my computer screen and then rotating them. They black out at certain angles.

    • @elysiumsnakefarm1185
      @elysiumsnakefarm1185 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      This is a common fact to those in da biz 😋 This is because Aviation screens on dashboards already have VERTICAL polarization, which blocks VERTICAL glare. Sunglass polarization blocks HORIZONTAL glare, so if you combine the two you get total blockage, which equals a blank dial to us. Thankfully, there are plenty of unpolarized Aviator and other Style options 😉 Polarization is not ideal for people with moderate-severe astigmatism OR sports folks, as polarization will mess with your depth perception slightly.

  • @spaghettisama
    @spaghettisama ปีที่แล้ว +145

    I work as an optician and the one thing I can confirm is that pretty much every frame we get is sent to us by Luxottica. Ray-Bans, Polo Ralph Laurent, Armani, Vogue... All these brands come from Luxottica. And all our materials, lenses, and machines are all Essilor. Only corp name I see besides those two are Optiplus, which I do think is a Belgian company specifically.

    • @cjewe1z
      @cjewe1z ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So, are these the only companies that we can get the best sunglasses from?

    • @MarcelNL
      @MarcelNL ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Am going to check the video later, but are the factories situated in Vietnam?
      There you can get all sorts of expensive sunglasses for $6 or so.
      Brand clothing and bags also are insanely cheap there. My wife and I went home with our suitcases full of Gucci, Northface, Armani and other brands of clothes.

    • @MR04B
      @MR04B 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@cjewe1zDefinitely not. Brands like Cartier, Dior, MJ, LV, etc are not owned by them. Of course there are companies/brands that are actually independent like Charmant, Morel, Serengeti, etc.

    • @highsoflyify
      @highsoflyify 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@MR04B
      They are not owned by them, but they are produced by them because they have the license. So in the end almost everything is 'Made by Luxoticca'

  • @louisrafaelcom
    @louisrafaelcom 2 ปีที่แล้ว +365

    I've had several aliexpress glasses tested by opticians and the lowest result was UV380. It doesn't make sense for a company to specifically run a factory line that doesn't comply. That would increase their costs more than simply producing UV-protective lenses across the board.
    If you want to save money on sunglasses, order the cheap ones and have them tested - most opticians will test for free and it just takes a minute.

    • @impossiblewhopper1691
      @impossiblewhopper1691 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      thanks if this is real

    • @louisrafaelcom
      @louisrafaelcom 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@impossiblewhopper1691 100% is. Try it. I thought surely living in Switzerland this would mean some dumb fee (which of course would be negligible compared with the difference to buying fancy shades at full price), but no, even here they tested them for free.

    • @WinstonOBoogie_
      @WinstonOBoogie_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      UV absorption is only one aspect though. The overall quality and durability is a major factor in pricing a pair of sunglasses. Like most consumer goods, we get what we pay for. Better quality frames will hold their adjustments better, have better lens materials and the finish on the frames will be more durable. If you get a better pair, frequently you can get a replacement part from the manufacturer to replace a broken one instead of throwing them away. Those are only some of the benefits of buying better quality like just about everything else.

    • @christhompson6010
      @christhompson6010 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@WinstonOBoogie_ Yes build quality is important. But i've noticed that quality is starting to take a backseat to profit. and this is with high end stuff Costa, Revo, Ray Ban. All this as the price increases.

    • @Karras353
      @Karras353 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@WinstonOBoogie_ If a single company has too much dominance of the high end and also happens to be a prestige brand, it’s pretty much impossible to say they “you get what you pay for”. The prestige and quality aspects are too intermingled but it is likely that a good portion of the price tag is for brand recognition alone.

  • @idraote
    @idraote 2 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    I have an easy compromise.
    I buy quality expensive glasses (I am in Italy, therefore Luxottica-Essilor are EVERYWHERE) but I choose an evergreen style for the frame.
    If my retailer has them, I'll take something from an old collection and it will be cheaper.
    I always go to the same retailer. They appreciate regular customers and they will go out of their way to treat me well.
    Then there's maintenance.
    Sunglasses are worn when it's hot.
    Sweat is horribly acidic and it will ruin your glasses in no time. When I come home, I wash them in warm (not hot, just tepid) water with baby mild soap. It takes 90 seconds, it takes away all stains and it makes your glasses last.
    I have had glasses for more than ten years and they look new.

    • @porichkaa
      @porichkaa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      hey, this was informative. thanks!

    • @DezaRay24
      @DezaRay24 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I had my Rx put in a pair of Ray-bans for summer wear. I’ll definitely remember this to help keep them looking great between use as my plan is to just replace my Rx in them each year, so it will be more affordable for me.

    • @Sheogoratful
      @Sheogoratful 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Unless your sunglasses have regular glasses lens or have an anti reflex treatment it's ok to do that

    • @idraote
      @idraote 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Sheogoratful you can wash them even with treated lenses. That is why you need to use tepid water and very mild soap.

    • @samueljason8437
      @samueljason8437 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sorry to break the bad news however the reason most brands and "falling apart" is due to luxottica lowering quality to make LVMH one of the most profitable companies on the planet. I have 50 year old RayBans that look new. I live and sweat in Miami Fl. I bought a New pair of Aviators in 2020 and they are pitting, poorly crafted, and literally...Falling apart.Luxottica ruined many fine brands in order to make a buck! Your advice about rinsing is good. Cheers.

  • @WouldntULikeToKnow.
    @WouldntULikeToKnow. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    Thank you, macular degeneration runs in my family. My grandmother went blind for the last decade of her life and really struggled, so experiencing that is one of my greatest fears. But I still want to avoid giving my money to monopolies! I will definitely be checking out Sunski!

    • @badreddinegacem
      @badreddinegacem 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What sunglasses did you settle on? And r they uv400 and polarized?

  • @benjaminwhite9423
    @benjaminwhite9423 2 ปีที่แล้ว +200

    Had my wayfarers over 10 years now and despite really not taking care of them-they live in my rucksack that's used daily, and they don't often get put in the case, they've been dropped many times but apart from a few scratches to the frame they are in great condition. The lenses are a mineral glass so don't scratch, and the frame is a cut and shaped acetate (not injection plastic as mentioned) the plastic is sort of translucent red when held up to a very bright light on my black ones, it feels like a quality material in a way most plastics don't. The original wayfarer is the strongest, hardest wearing set of eyewear I've ever had my hands on. That said, not all raybans are as hard wearing, the carbon ones are prone to falling apart and a lot of the newer designs have plastic lenses and feature more injection moulding.

    • @MrViolence999
      @MrViolence999 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      OP which wayfarers do you have? Can you drop a link? Or brand and model name

    • @hollywoodsalad2670
      @hollywoodsalad2670 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@MrViolence999 Pls don’t wear the same sunglasses for 10 years because the sun lenses all have expire dates, about 3-5 years. I learned from this handmade brand called NYBK and their products served me well over many years.

    • @007cheburashka
      @007cheburashka 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@hollywoodsalad2670 sounds like a bunch of bs. If the lens is glass you especially have nothing to worry about.

    • @hollywoodsalad2670
      @hollywoodsalad2670 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@007cheburashka lol googling ‘sunglasses lens expiration’ would help ignorance

    • @queso1281
      @queso1281 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fun fact, the carbon fiber ones are one of the few styles of ray bans made in China, while similar styles made in Italy rarely have those quality issues

  • @triadwarfare
    @triadwarfare 2 ปีที่แล้ว +163

    For those who are bragging that they still have functioning frames: I still use the same frame I had in 2016 and it was a generic no-brand name that cost $10 including compatible lens and prescription and I am still using it to this day.
    I did have to replace the lens in 2019 though, because I needed to have my lenses corrected.

    • @livefastdiequick
      @livefastdiequick 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They probably lasted you because you’re a nerd that doesn’t go outside or take your glasses off unless you are going to be in the same room as a mirror

    • @sylvisterling8782
      @sylvisterling8782 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I'll see your 2016 frames and raise you my great great grandmother's Victorian gold=plated spectacle frames. I had them re-lensed and now wear them when doing cosplay. I have six or seven pairs of Victorian frames. Those puppies were built to LAST!

    • @ava5199
      @ava5199 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol. They are brainwashed.

    • @polishtheday
      @polishtheday 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I had prescription lenses put in Prada frames I paid $20 for at an auction. They’re at least twenty years old and a style that’s no longer being made so whenever I’m ask where I got them I just say they’re vintage.

    • @jacknick429
      @jacknick429 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have a pair of Rayban New Wayfarer’s I bought in 2010 - Aaaaaand I still look just like Jack Nicholson when I wear ‘em !!!!

  • @lacrosse8011
    @lacrosse8011 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Costco is the go to place for these type of glasses. Bought a par of Maui Jim's for $99 when the normally retail for $250

  • @hhhenge
    @hhhenge 2 ปีที่แล้ว +164

    I recently bought Akila sun glasses, LA based small company doing luxury quality sunglasses for around $120. Really pleased with them

    • @Vega.pdf35mm
      @Vega.pdf35mm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I have huf x Akila sun glasses a while back and still have them

    • @lchenny8288
      @lchenny8288 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What kind did you get

    • @hhhenge
      @hhhenge 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lchenny8288 I got the Legacy pair, in black. just the most boring ones they had lol

    • @hommeboyy
      @hommeboyy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have a few pairs from them too. They’re really nice quality for the price

    • @lbjoshbal
      @lbjoshbal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      For 120 bucks theyre still expensive like raybans right?

  • @Blazerghost
    @Blazerghost 2 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    Finding sunglasses that fit is more of a struggle than avoiding luxottica. There are a lot of excellent smaller brands out there now.

    • @LaurentiusTriarius
      @LaurentiusTriarius ปีที่แล้ว +1

      New in the box, I only buy vuarnet sunglasses, they feature mineral glass and it's a family owned business since the beginning. Super high quality

    • @zsoltmajtenyi7838
      @zsoltmajtenyi7838 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For example? How would a simple buyer like me could identify that I buy something not from these monopolistic guys but I support with my purchase a small alternative company?

    • @Blazerghost
      @Blazerghost 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@theOGabcduong Yes but you can’t adjust the size of a frame/lense…

    • @gmonkman
      @gmonkman 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@codex6594 So errr ... are you saying that all those companies do their own manufacturing? I smell rebrands - which isn't a problem - but I get the feeling that you think all those companies DO manufacture the lenses. Hell, they may do - but ... have you checked?

  • @bofud
    @bofud 2 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    I'm not really a brand kinda guy. I do like some local brands but generally it's not something I pay a lot of attention to
    I think I owned 20 different pair of sunglasses over the course of my 30 years on this planet. They kept breaking. I thought that's just me being silly, not treating them very well. So why would I go for expensive sunglasses if they'll only last me a year? Well one year my sunglasses broke again but this time it was very apparent that it was due to their low quality. They just disintegrated over time. Okay, I told myself, I'm gonna give this ONE shot and go for expensive sunglasses and see how long they'll last me. I didn't think it was gonna be a good economic decision for me because I'd have to basically wear them for 10+ years to justify the 150 euro price tag for a pair of original wayfarers. (calculating one 15 euro pair of sunglasses every year, which honestly was quite realistic) Anyway I bought them, knowing I'd probably take better care of a more luxury item. That was like 6 years ago and I've owned the same pair of wayfareres since then.
    So by that calculation it's only 4 more years until it wasn't only a better ecologic but also a better economic decision to get expensive sunglasses.
    Just thought this was an interesting observation. The reason they last longer I think, is split between on the one hand taking better care of them and on the other hand them being better quality.

    • @JackHsu83
      @JackHsu83 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I had my previous wayfarer for about six years. And the only reason I had to replace them was because I left them in a rental car accidentally.
      Designer sunglasses aren't that expensive if you think about their cost per year (like $10) over their lifespan.
      This is how everything should be viewed.

    • @sylvisterling8782
      @sylvisterling8782 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I completely agree! For regular wear, I wear Versace or Armani. For sunglasses, Ray Bans. They LAST!

    • @BIackPhillip
      @BIackPhillip 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wayfarers are still handmade in Italy

    • @samueljason8437
      @samueljason8437 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Plus You spend $ and tend to take better care of them! Don't Buy New. Buy, well taking care of vintage. Avoid luxottica! They have lowered the quality to SHITE!

  • @floppybopnopfloppybopnop440
    @floppybopnopfloppybopnop440 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    In that picture Dylan wasn't wearing Raybans. He did wear them at some point in 1965 a year before he found the slightly more chic and iconic glasses which I still haven't found.

    • @amytownsend8455
      @amytownsend8455 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I didn't think anyone else would notice lol

    • @floppybopnopfloppybopnop440
      @floppybopnopfloppybopnop440 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@amytownsend8455 haha yeah just wanted to let others know. :)

    • @pdcichosz
      @pdcichosz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Likely 1st Ray-Ban Caribbean or some copycat.

  • @loganthecarguy9109
    @loganthecarguy9109 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    I really liked this video but I feel it’s maybe a touch exaggerated although not far off. I personally work for Sunglass Hut and very much understand half of what we sell isn’t amazing quality for what you pay but there are brands that are an exception.
    Persol, for example, is one brand that we sell that often integrates glass lenses and better yet most of the product is hand-made, with additional benefits like a modular arm that can expand to fit larger faces better. On sale, if you are patient you can get Persols for about $150-200 USD for a pair of fully handmade Italian glasses with huge historical significance, that better yet uses Acetate a much higher quality way of making plastic glasses is a very good deal. On top of that if you do end up breaking them we have a generous 1-year breakage warranty that allows you to have an allowance of half of what you originally paid for a pair of glasses towards any of your choice. Furthermore, you don't need to spend $200 on a pair of glasses through Luxottica, we have a lot of brands such as Polo, Arnette, and Vogue which often fall into the $100 if you aren't picky about models.
    On top of that, I would like to mention Luxottica whilst owning a large market share doesn’t ultimately limit competition, there is still a very saturated amount of competitors which offer great sunglasses for great deals a favorite of mine right now is Kiaura eyewear, where prices can readily be available for around $150. Funny enough similarly priced to most of our Rayban's, similarly most brands that incorporate similar quality materials aren't that much cheaper if you are comparing apples to apples. This was very well touched upon till the end of the video but I feel this needs to be emphasized more because Luxottica ultimately doesn’t have influence to the extent that they are the only ones providing halfway decent sunglasses.
    Lastly, I think something that is important is understanding how sunglasses are made, there is a technic called plastic injection which is what most Sunglasses incorporate, whilst you can buy a $50 pair of sunglasses the chances being are plastic injected is a more cost-effective way of producing pairs. Most nicer glasses are acetate which is a method that requires a lot more effort to produce but also makes your more expensive pairs more durable and prone to future wear, Acetate is a process that is furthermore complicated in the instance that you want frames in tortoise colors or unconventional colors, often requiring a high degree of physical input to produce. Whilst you are correct that UV 400 protection is readily available ultimately these lenses can’t be compared, factors such as the materials, lens category, and the polarisation technology aren’t great on cheaper pairs, so much to the extent I wouldn’t recommend cycling with cheaper pairs as your supermarket lenses often affect your depth perception, especially inexpensive polarised supermarket sunglasses.

    • @CorinnaOnTheRun
      @CorinnaOnTheRun 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Super interesting insider info. Thanks.

    • @loganthecarguy9109
      @loganthecarguy9109 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@CorinnaOnTheRun For sure, just feel its tricky to make a full judgment without knowing all these factors

    • @realacrossestrings
      @realacrossestrings 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      This is cool info! I just got some handmade Persols and I’m a huge fan of them

    • @llamallama9637
      @llamallama9637 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Love my Persol El Professor sunglasses. They really are quality.

  • @Budfrog23
    @Budfrog23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I have several pairs of Ray Bans and they are decent but I recently bought a pair of Bolle Safety - Contour Safety Glasses - Polarised mainly for golf and cycling. I've been blown away by the quality and they don't look like safeties, and for a tad over £35 they are excellent value.

  • @journeymanedc
    @journeymanedc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    Randolph Engineering makes phenomenal aviator sunglasses and offer a lifetime warranty on their frames which makes up for the high cost in my opinion. They're also one of the few higher end brands not under the Luxotica umbrella.

    • @joshuacoppo2900
      @joshuacoppo2900 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I bought serengetis because high quality, good technology and not Luxottica

    • @journeymanedc
      @journeymanedc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@joshuacoppo2900 I hadn't heard of them before but they look like a great option as well!

    • @pmwaffle9348
      @pmwaffle9348 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Loads of high end independent brands exist, but they're more expensive than mainstream high end

    • @jicalzad
      @jicalzad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      although i agree that their one of the few high quality sunglass manufacturers out there, their hike in prices in the past 3 to 5 years have definitely been noticeable. I don't think their manufacturing processes or technology has changed much, if at all. Of course, i'm sure they have to eventually give their employees raises every once in a while. Having said that, i've purchased 2 different sunglasses from them in the past 5 years and can vouch for their quality and classic styling. I probably would purchase from them more often if they were a bit cheaper.

    • @naterardin8053
      @naterardin8053 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I just got a pair and the build quality is insane compared to the ray bans I used to have.

  • @SilverSamurai12
    @SilverSamurai12 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Good video.
    As someone that used to work in optical, I'm glad you touched on luxxotica not simply raising prices and not caring about quality at all. Lots of people seem to think this is the case.
    Not trying to excuse their practices (which suck btw), but if their stuff was junk, the major fashion brands (Dior, Armani, etc.) would leave. As you mentioned, they have a reputation to keep.
    Unfortunately, the quality of Oakley's has sucked since the takeover. I'm hoping mine last for a loooong time.

    • @sylvisterling8782
      @sylvisterling8782 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You and I have the same experience! Read my large post elsewhere in this comment section.

    • @jonevansauthor
      @jonevansauthor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ok that's the bit that bothers me - Oakleys have/might have gone downhill. The ones I had failed because the arms touched the inside of the lens for no apparent reason and rubbed the coating. Was the coating also bad? It did wear away fairly easily which makes me wonder if they dropped quality.
      What sort of quality issues do you think Oakley have now?
      People who buy glasses from Armani don't get my sympathy. It'd be like buying a bicycle from Lamborghini and wondering why it wasn't any good.

  • @simonhodgetts6530
    @simonhodgetts6530 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I bought some Persol folding sunglasses - not the Steve McQueen model, but the original style. They’re extremely well made, timeless, and will last decades. Bought 2nd hand for a fraction of the full price. Very happy with them!

    • @brown22sugar25
      @brown22sugar25 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Same but I did get the Steve McQueen ones

    • @maxvalentine8010
      @maxvalentine8010 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Persol is owned by luxxotica lol

    • @LorianandLothric
      @LorianandLothric ปีที่แล้ว

      @@maxvalentine8010It’s the best Luxoticca brand

  • @J3unG
    @J3unG 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yeh...60 Minutes did a report on this about 10 years ago. It's good this info is updated with your report. Keep up the good work, bro!!!!

  • @butchgreene
    @butchgreene 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Would have been nice to accompany the article with a list of companies NOT owned by Luxottica like Smith Optics, 100%, Rudy Project, Maui Jim, Spy Optics, etc

    • @shecockband
      @shecockband 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Look into Kering. They own Gucci, YSL and now Maui Jim

    • @notanartist4273
      @notanartist4273 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Marcolin have Tom Ford, Anyhow I don’t think the man who made the video is a professional in the eyewear industry tho

  • @sheralbee
    @sheralbee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I love love love my Sunski sunglasses, they are my first pair of good quality sunnies and are a game changer while driving. Plus they are a great shape and thus flattering worn. I’m coming around to not just believing but also practicing doing some reading/learning and investing in quality. As long as I am thoughtful with my quality items, I know they’ll last me a long while :)

  • @MS-df7wp
    @MS-df7wp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    This problem also stretches to regular glasses where prescription glasses are so expensive

    • @martaluterek9008
      @martaluterek9008 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep, and prescription sunglasses are even more expensive than both combined (from my experience at least)

    • @FutureProofTV
      @FutureProofTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Heya! Funnily enough, we started the process of writing a script for a prescription glasses video and realized we'd be covering a lot of the same stuff 🤣 thanks for joining us here, Mikayla ✌️

    • @MS-df7wp
      @MS-df7wp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FutureProofTV lol yeah it’s basically the same problem at that point and I have to go to the box stores because I’ve tried online and couldn’t wear it because the lenses were wrong so that’s been a disaster. At least I try to keep my glasses until they literally break before getting a new pair

    • @dentjoener
      @dentjoener 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Man, I wear mine for like 10 years. The only reason I can (barely) justify spending half a grand on them. I do have a -5 so if you don't want fishbowls, and do care about some anti reflective properties, you'll pay. One lens is more than the frame they're in...

    • @martaluterek9008
      @martaluterek9008 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dentjoener I have a -5 too so I feel you, actually with my newest glasses the lenses cost 10x the frame, lol. My issue also is that my prescription used to change almost every year, it only stabilized about 2 years ago. At least in my country in Europe prescription glasses are actually a little bit cheaper than in the US (but probably comparably expensive if you take into account what people earn).

  • @Yance_000
    @Yance_000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Roka is a high quality manufacturer of glasses as well as triathlon gear in Austin Texas. Good to support local companies that make high quality products

    • @FutureProofTV
      @FutureProofTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's awesome to hear! We're learning of a bunch of small lense manufacturers all around the globe through this video which rocks 💪 thanks for sharing!

  • @Bettinasisrg
    @Bettinasisrg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    I get migraines bad, and a friend gave me their old Smith sunglasses and it was a game changer. Well years and many scratches later I needed a new pair and fainted when I found they're $400!!!! So did a bunch of research and found a $15 pair which worked just as good! I just couldn't justify that much even though it was for medical purposes.

    • @R1val909
      @R1val909 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      What brand?

  • @barbietripping
    @barbietripping 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    🎉 congrats on your play button!
    Even happier knowing I’ve been wearing Sunski for 4 years now

    • @FutureProofTV
      @FutureProofTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey thanks so much! We really appreciate the support 😊

  • @Cjaz84
    @Cjaz84 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Optician here at a private practice. Luxottica is evil and most raybans are shit. I would never spend my own money on one unless I get a hella deal. Maui Jim is my jam and worth the price. But anyways. At our place raybans are always half off because we understand how marked up the products are. Essilor lenses are great when the lab puts out decent work. We do have a high redo rate.

  • @arvi6847
    @arvi6847 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I have sunski,and loving the quality and what the brand stands for. Thanks to you i found them,and i feel good every time i use them. Never buying the expensive brands, for me anyways. Buying another sunski coz they give back to the planet,why not !😊

  • @brandondegraaf
    @brandondegraaf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I bought Polaroid sunglasses six years ago. If they can't polarize then nobody can. They patented the process. The glasses have been with me to some rough places, all kinds of weather, crammed into my backpack, smacked in the face by vegetation and bumblebees, dropped on rocks, and they remain in good condition. The price was very fair.

    • @J3unG
      @J3unG 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I got polarized glasses for $1 at the $1 store. They work great and I don't give a fuck if I lose, break or destroy them. They're sunglasses and they serve a purpose that is not flexing or fashion.

  • @MrBadgers
    @MrBadgers 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I still like my Goodr shades, and price is pretty hard to beat.
    Same deal 1% 4 the planet, carbon neutral, etc. etc. fun colors

    • @FutureProofTV
      @FutureProofTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Nice!!! Fun colors is hard to beat... 😅 Thanks for joining us here!

    • @HEMAYATC
      @HEMAYATC 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I was looking for someone to mention Goodr! I’ve been using them for years now because they are perfect for running and being active. No slip or bounce and they have a huge selection of colors. My one complaint is that the lenses get scratched up too easily, so I try to be careful with them.

    • @jonevansauthor
      @jonevansauthor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ok, I want wraparound but Goodr do have a pair called VOIGHT-KAMPFF VISION which tickles my fancy :D

  • @toniceyewearamerica9369
    @toniceyewearamerica9369 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I am want to thank you for telling the truth about EL. EL has made it next to impossible for our sunglass line, "Tonic Eyewear" to be offered to consumers in select stores because of their monopolistic attitude. There are brands out there that are higher quality than anything EL offers. Ours being one of them. Hopefully, someone gets the word to end this Standard Oil of Eyewear.

  • @bradhend
    @bradhend 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I was hoping to hear about the mid range shades. Like Shadyrays or Knockarounds. Covered the high end and the cheap junk, but there's a middle ground that got overlooked.

    • @fluffy13bondjames92
      @fluffy13bondjames92 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have some of the Ventura? I believe shadyrays they are a lot like the wayfarers really good I’ve had them for about a year

    • @umamaheshwarreddy
      @umamaheshwarreddy ปีที่แล้ว

      Came here looking for a comment mentioning Knockaround. When I first heard of them through an Instagram ad in 2021, I wanted to give it a shot and bought a pair of wayfarers and aviators, still in great shape. Definitely recommend them.

  • @puali00
    @puali00 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I work for Ray-Ban, I love the brand but the company practices are lame. Not a fan of how they handled Oakley at all, but I guess that’s just capitalism & strategy for ya.

  • @masons3994
    @masons3994 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I have a pair of Rayban polarized folding wayfarer, spent $220 I think in store. Bought them 7 years ago and have used them almost every day, taken them everywhere I've gone and they’re still holding up great and I still absolutely love them. Fit me well, love the look, and work good. While i'm sure it cost them nothing to make and there is better options out there, i'm happy with my purchase

    • @nickyjames1985
      @nickyjames1985 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That's the reason why they Mark up the price, because their customers only buy once every 5 or so years.
      Creed Aventus for example costs 400bucks but 100ml lasts you years whereas CK eternity is 10bucks but you're spraying it every 20mins and you'll spend 400bucks on the CK over a year or 2

    • @elysiumsnakefarm1185
      @elysiumsnakefarm1185 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If Ray Ban made the folding wayfarer polarized in tortoise shell...I'd already have them

    • @hawkinsmitch
      @hawkinsmitch 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@nickyjames1985 agree, that's exactly how I justify buying Creed and Ray-Ban. Quality, that lasts and provides me utility/value over a longer period.

    • @nickyjames1985
      @nickyjames1985 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hawkinsmitch I'm a vintage Carrera guy myself I enjoy the fact I'm wearing 40+ year old eyewear that's still going in great shape, however I've got no issue with modern Ray Ban or Carrera quality there really hasn't been that much change over the years apart from the addition of nylon frames in some models which are trash

    • @alexandrademartini7496
      @alexandrademartini7496 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was given some as a gift. I am a teacher and have worn them every day for 5 years and they are in perfect shape. I’m also legally blind and can see very well through them.

  • @viniciusacmauro
    @viniciusacmauro 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    I feel you should have talked more about the tech behind high quality lenses and frames. I did a lot of research before buying my last pair and the difference in quality between the cheap DTC glasses I got and a RayBan seemed quite small. Even though the video mentions that there are good DTC brands it takes too long to nail the main point, in my opinion - that not only RayBans and friends are bad for the industry, they are also mostly overpriced.

    • @viniciusacmauro
      @viniciusacmauro 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Beaverish Buck Teeth What would be the lie my friend?

  • @mickyday2008
    @mickyday2008 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I’ve had great service from Oakley in the UK when my sunglasses broke. Either fixed free of charge or for a nominal charge. Very impressed.

  • @Lioralon1
    @Lioralon1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    I think the sensible solution is to buy mid-tear sunglasses. Those are connected to a name with a reputation and are safe to use (and will probably last a while) without paying for designer brands. It's true that if it's not regulated it could be a problem, but sunglasses are some the worst price mark-up goods- they're dirt cheap to make and there's absolutely no reason in the world to pay 200$ for them.

  • @rickyprice3156
    @rickyprice3156 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I actually recently got some Sunski's--highly recommended for quality, style, and price 👌

    • @thinkinggrin165
      @thinkinggrin165 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes the price.
      It just shows how much profit is made by this Monopoly when the rest is made to look like garbage.

  • @rogergrant455
    @rogergrant455 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    First off let me say that i'm a sunglasses man! I can't wear Rayband or Oakley (made by same company) because they give me headaches........wear them for a week, I get a headache. Stop wearing them for two weeks everything good! Start back wearing them and headaches again. I did this for three occasions and the headaches kept returning so I was done with them. I stepped up a notch and wear Maui Jim or Vuarnets and no problem! AHHH, peace! I spoke to a sales rep in a local sunglasses store about it and she said that the level of the filter and the quality of the lens on the MJ's in particular (Not saying that V isn't great) is way superior than Rb or Oakley. My eyes and my head tend to agree!
    If you can wear Rb or Oakley then kuddos to you but not for me.
    Blessings!

  • @davestagner
    @davestagner 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I recently got a set of Maui Jims with prescription lenses - an independent company not owned by E.L. They cost, erm, a LOT. But they are hands down the best glasses I’ve ever owned, even with commercial prescription brands. After doing a multi-day road trip in them, I think it was worth every penny.

    • @dimitar297
      @dimitar297 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've never worn sunglasses in my life. What's the appeal?

    • @davestagner
      @davestagner ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dimitar297 Reducing brightness and glare. My glasses have polarized lenses, which reduce stray light. Here’s an easy experiment - put on a pair of polarized sunglasses, and go look at some clouds. They’ll immediately appear much sharper and well-defined. This is true of all sorts of things. I feel safer driving on a sunny day with polarized glasses on, because I can see far better.

    • @NoNo-uy2bq
      @NoNo-uy2bq ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dimitar297not having to deal with the sun? Looks?

  • @Jeffrey.e
    @Jeffrey.e 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Huh, I didn’t know that the cheap, freebie sunglasses could potentially be harmful. That’s like all I use since I have like 4 pairs! May need to look into that more (although truly I don’t wear sunglasses that much and they mostly sit in my car and get put on during *particulalry* bright days while I’m driving)

  • @wiskeeamazingdancer4964
    @wiskeeamazingdancer4964 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    And here I thought EL were quick to take down the video.

  • @timofeigarbuzov
    @timofeigarbuzov 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    guys i'm sure you'll get to a million and beyond! just bcause it's so interesting to listen to you and look at these graphs

  • @keysersoze503
    @keysersoze503 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Luxxotica is basically the Mafia of eyewear. As for paying 100s of dollars for sunglasses, how lousy do you feel after you lose them? No thanks. My range is not too cheap. Not too expensive.

  • @ShadeReview
    @ShadeReview 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thanks so much for talking about why you want to avoid buying cheep or fake sunglasses!
    Our vision is way to important to risk with sketchy sunglasses!
    EDIT: @11:10 in the video he shows the RB3025 for $139 but then compares them to a special Copper Gradient Flash color way that was $234
    But the exact Large Metal Gold G15 Lens pair from 2011 that was $139 is now $163 on their official website.
    Ether way great video!

  • @TKO-1503
    @TKO-1503 ปีที่แล้ว

    Idk why the algorithm recommended your channel to me, however I'm glad it did. You have content on your channel i never knew I was interested in or would be in. I have been binging your content, very methodical and well put together the quality of your videos is simple yet so good. Keep it up man! You got a new subscriber!

  • @YungStinkyWinky
    @YungStinkyWinky 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Commenting now before watching a minute of it: I so so so so hope Levi shows us the Oakley founder/CEO's mansion. It's horrific and amazing.

    • @FutureProofTV
      @FutureProofTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Fuuuuuuu we totally should have!!

    • @thru_and_thru
      @thru_and_thru 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah this guy is pretty shady. He knew about Lance Armstrong's doping and kept it quiet and silenced some Oakley employees as Lance was propelling the sale of their glasses like no other. I'm pretty sure Lance was single handedly responsible for a lot of Oakley's success before the sale to Luxotica.

    • @callumgill7019
      @callumgill7019 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thru_and_thru everyone in cycling was doping. Almost every single sports top competition is riddled with PEDs. None of this is secret

  • @andrewwilks2700
    @andrewwilks2700 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I love the old Wayfarers without the RayBan logo on the arm. I have a stash to last me the rest of my life.

    • @sylvisterling8782
      @sylvisterling8782 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have a pair of 1930's style frames... seriously ancient (they have CELLULOID nosepieces!!) that are the earliest RayBan frames out there! They are an unusual shape, but are gold-plated with the OLD style temples, thin metal with curling ear hooks! Took them to an antiques dealer and he said they were genuine! I'm hanging onto these babies!

  • @dr.kawasaki7380
    @dr.kawasaki7380 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    *Oh boy, someone's on the A-list black list now* 😆

    • @FutureProofTV
      @FutureProofTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      👀👀 if we don't post next week you know what happened

  • @malcolmfraser2066
    @malcolmfraser2066 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The problem with sunglasses is that they're easy to forget left and right, once you remove them when day turns to night. If you don't carry a purse or a backpack, you're very likely to just leave them lying around. I usually buy sunglasses that he drugstore, for around 10 euros a pair, and this lasts me for as long as I don't lose them. Sure, maybe their quality is not the very best, but according to their labelling they offer the protection I need, and they don't necessarily look terrible like the "dime a dozen" glasses you describe in your video. I'm surprised you didn't talk about the markup brands like Ray-ban make on a pair of say, aviator frames. Good video though!

    • @DeepakKumar-lv4te
      @DeepakKumar-lv4te 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you mess your eyes up, you'll have to get prescription sg's or transitions. I guarantee you won't lose those, cos you'll end up walking around half blind!

  • @owenhowever1958
    @owenhowever1958 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    early here yet again, said the video was privated for a second lmao what was that about or was it on my end. anyway great to see another upload

    • @Bat_Boy
      @Bat_Boy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For about 30-60 mins.

    • @FutureProofTV
      @FutureProofTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Hey there! The video was originally published in a lower quality than we usually upload in so we re-uploaded ✌️ hope this clears things up!

    • @owenhowever1958
      @owenhowever1958 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@FutureProofTV oh i see congrats to the team on the play button by the way!

    • @FutureProofTV
      @FutureProofTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@owenhowever1958 Thanks so much, Owen!

  • @oime1233
    @oime1233 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    From a french guy, I buy only Moscot brand (eye and sun glasses with Nikon glasses), created in 1915, in New York, the original creator of the Wayfarers (please check this out), but to bad, the design got stolen....Lemtosh are Iconics, last for ever, and real after sales services from their retailers, you may change parts if necessary....pricy but worth it, by the way, the Pirate wears only that brand.

    • @droppenheimer1
      @droppenheimer1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Johnny doesn't wear only that brand, but yeah, Moscot is high quality.

  • @Abelicious_
    @Abelicious_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I recently bought a pair of Maui Jims. Really happy with them

    • @FutureProofTV
      @FutureProofTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you're enjoying them! Thanks for taking the time to join us here, Abel 🤗

  • @spencerwooters965
    @spencerwooters965 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have the original Wayfayer Ran Bans. I wore them my whole time in the Marine Corp because they didn't scratch and didn't fog up as bad as the ESS glasses. I got a lot of crap, but they never broke. Even being the front man in the stack watching doors blow up 6' in front of me w/out the blast blanket.

  • @rachel3760
    @rachel3760 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I bought a pair of Suncloud glasses after seeing them recommended on Reddit. I have super sensitive blue eyes, my optometrist told me I have "absolutely no natural sun protection" in my eyes. And I absolutely love them! They're not the cheapest but I treat them like crap and they still fit with no scratches.

    • @Yixdy
      @Yixdy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Grey eyes (and to a lesser extent, blue) are that 'color' because they have no melanin, or no color actually. Same reason the sky is blue. Anyways, no melanin, no sunlight getting reflected back away from your eyes. But yeah, the snow flashbangs me several times a year

  • @glennsak
    @glennsak 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Luxottica is like the Mob. But they do make some nice glasses.

  • @sylvisterling8782
    @sylvisterling8782 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What was not mentioned specifically is that Luxxotica now OWNS the Sunglass Hut AND LensCrafters! They MAY also own Pearle Vision (not sure).
    I am a member of the Lions Clubs, and I accept, sort, repair, grade and package used eyeglasses (over a thousand pairs a month) to be sent to specialists in the Lions Club, who then further sort them by prescription, and send the glasses overseas to third world countries to provide vision for people too poor to afford eye care. Thus, I come across a LOT of glasses!
    I agree with this guy that Luxxotica is a gigantic "octopus" controlling the glasses market but also they DO provide excellent quality. I can tell just by touch alone that Ray Ban, Versace, Oakley, Coach, Dolce & Gabbana, Brooks Brothers, Armani, Armani Exchange, Deneuve, Gucci and many other top label brands are owned by Luxxotica AND that they are high quality. Knock-offs exist, and I generally can find them immediately.
    I deplore Luxxotica's business practices (as an INDIVIDUAL! I do NOT speak for Lions Clubs!) but yes, their quality IS maintained. If you want to avoid Luxxotica, then EyeBobs, Eye Buy Direct, and the brand he mentioned and a number of other Internet based companies DO sell non Luxxotica eyeglasses.

  • @virajpatel_
    @virajpatel_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I ordered a pair from some local manufacturer online, they had good reviews and the sunglasses cost me around ₹ 800/- (or 10$) and they are all features loaded, UV 400 polarization etc., and somehow I feel better wearing those than my brother's ray ben aviators, my brother also told me the same, so unless you want that big name "Ray - Ban" or " D & G ", you can find yourself some really good pair for around 10-30$ with same and even better lenses than these brands.

  • @iioaneb
    @iioaneb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Loved your video! In actively trying to avoid E.L. I found Tens and INVU. I prefer Tens while on vacation because of their amazingly cool filter which instantly puts me in a good mood, but wear INVU regularly for the polarized lens.

  • @RoseWillowstone
    @RoseWillowstone 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Welp, I just watched this video on the day that I decided to overcome my fear of sunglasses and buy the ones I really liked from my local drugstore. I guess it was a bit of a mistake but at least I'm happy that I'm not delusion in beign afraid to wear sunglasses because they trick the iris into opening more due to the dimmer light and thus damaging the eyes. But I kinda got them because it's hard for me to find ones that fit me and I found them and secondly, I thought they'd help with my potential sun allergy.

  • @giorgiaolivotto8442
    @giorgiaolivotto8442 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi there, loved the video and also have a small part of this story that might interest you! So, I live in the province where Luxottica was founded and still has a lot of its original factories: it's called Belluno and it's mostly known for Cortina and the Dolomites. One of the reasons why Luxottica was that successful is that the area already had a tradition of making good quality eyewear since pre-industrial times. While at the beginning, during the Italian economic boom, the presence of such a successful business was good for our mountainous and marginal territory, the population in the last decades has grown more and more dependent on it, with a good portion of the working class being employed in Luxottica and a lot of other smaller business working in the supply chain. The big issue is that this giant is shaping from the core how our province is developing, without giving back enough and preparing a future where younger generations will be still more dependent on it. And while a lot of us youngsters are leaving because here is either Luxottica or a very precarious job position, we fear what kind of damage to the economy some sort of delocalisation could cause. Despite this, we are resilient, resourceful and have the luck to live in one of the richer areas of Europe (northern Italy): I can't imagine the impact that corporations like this can cause to poorer areas of the world 😢

  • @andreagriffiths3512
    @andreagriffiths3512 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’ve just bought some prescription sunnies from Zenni because I do not have $400-1000 to spend. It’s damned scary. The costs are insane!

  • @aaronmiller103
    @aaronmiller103 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I work at sunglass hut and two reasons why the prices keep going up are because of inflation and thefts.

  • @NJRey
    @NJRey ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Back in college in 2005 I tried Julbo, a French company that makes Mountaineering sunglasses, and they have more affordable street shades, best quality and they cost less than half of Rayban or oakley, Julbo still sells expensive models, understandable if you will need them to protect your eyes while climbing the Everest, but their everyday styles are very affordable and have the same tech... I don't mind paying a price for quality, but paying just because of the name on the temple is ridiculous

  • @ShootingUtah
    @ShootingUtah 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Occasionally you can find brands like skeleton sunglasses that are made in luxottica factories in Italy but in the beginning only cost like $35. If you go to their website now they charge over $200 for the same models I bought for $35.
    Now I'm left searching for cheap sunglasses made in Italy rather than China.

    • @nothomelessonyoutube
      @nothomelessonyoutube 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why don't you just pay more for better sunglasses

    • @xylo5750
      @xylo5750 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nothomelessonyoutube because they aren't better sunglasses... Did you not watch the video?

    • @nothomelessonyoutube
      @nothomelessonyoutube 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@xylo5750 I did but I have also touched real ray bans, Gucci, and Louis Vuitton sunglasses. They just are better than your 20-70 dollar bullshit. Oakley another glasses company owned by luxottica. Are awesome they worked amazing for me. If you want better shit you gotta pay more and do research.

  • @ZesPak
    @ZesPak ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm going to shout out William Painter here. We've got 3 pairs of them and they look great and are amazingly built.
    Gone through many pairs before but can't seem to break these.
    I've got a pair of similar Armani's and the build quality is night and day.

  • @adnamamedia
    @adnamamedia 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm really surprised that the Oakley thing was even remotely legal

  • @SkylerKing
    @SkylerKing ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am not sure I believe the whole thing about the quality still being decent/good in order to maintain reputation. I say that because I always owned second hand sunglasses that were given to me by older relatives (old school wayfarers, aviators, etc) and never had issues with them. Then, a few years back, I decided to actually drop a few hundred dollars on a brand new pair of Raybans, right out of a Rayban shop. I justified it by assuring myself that Rayban made good stuff that would last, and buying right out of the shop would ensure that I was getting the real thing rather than risking a fake if ordered online. The result? They were complete garbage. I babied those things and still somehow managed to completely destroy the lens coating within just a few weeks. I've heard similar stories from others about modern Raybans being high priced garage. Seeing as how they are all owned by the same company, I can only assume that they don't care as much about their reputation since there is no competition to worry about.

  • @irvhaas421
    @irvhaas421 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I prefer Maui Jim sunglasses, but prefer not to pay their high prices. Many do not know that Maui Jim's discontinued models are now sold by Costco. You can buy glasses that retail frequently over $300 for just $96 for Costco members.
    These are factory sealed eyewear with Maui Jim's case and microfiber cloth.

    • @hugomota3696
      @hugomota3696 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maui Jim is now owned by Kering, so soon will be overpriced as the Luxottica and Safilo brands :/

  • @jonevansauthor
    @jonevansauthor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My first Oakleys lasted 13 years before the coating finally gave out. My new ones 12 months. I'm now about to replace the lenses with secondary market ones, which I hope are fine (they're about a quarter of the price, and should still be good quality polarized lenses...)
    The problem is, there's no way of knowing, if there's as good, or if Oakley are still making good lenses. I check out Sunski, and they don't make wraparound glasses so I'll stick with Oakley. Sungod also look good, but I like my sunglasses to cover the sides of my eyes. I'd rather have Oakleys cheaper models than buy a Wayfarer shape that doesn't protect me from all angles.
    Sadly, Sungod don't do the Oakley style of wraparounds although they do do massive cycling and skiing goggles but you've got to be pretty blase to wear cycling glasses day to day. The person I know who does a) does a lot of long distance road cycling and b) has expensive prescription Oakleys.
    What I don't know about the lenses is whether or not the hardening coatings and general clarity is much different. Oakley claim to have developed good lens tech, which may be true but I can't be sure either way (I think it *was* legit but I don't entirely trust Luxxotica). Will my new lenses be any good at all? I'm not sure I'll know to be honest.

    • @jicalzad
      @jicalzad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i do think Oakley prizm sunglasses are some of the better, if not best, lenses on the market. I can't really find anyone else making those types of quality lenses for a cheaper price than Oakley. For me, it's the Oakley lenses that i like most. Their frames aren't anything special.

    • @jonevansauthor
      @jonevansauthor 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jicalzad I was dragged back to the thread by someone else's comment. I bought lenses for my old Conductor 8 that were aftermarket, because I didn't want to pay the outrageous price of Oakleys. They didn't fit properly though, it was a serious let down.
      I found an Oakley forum after this that could have helped me find a more reputable third party supplier - the problem with the lenses I had was they were the right shape, but the edge was too thick to fit in the groove in the frame so they could never have fitted properly, and they fell out. Several times.
      In the end, during a 50% sale I bought Oakley Plazma Prizm Polarized which are usually £190... but I got them far far cheaper as they had a massive sale on. They still have a sale on, or they have a new sale on so my advice is to only ever buy when they're on sale tbh. Much like I would never buy a sofa unless it was on sale, or a takeaway pizza.

  • @blacktiger2154
    @blacktiger2154 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’d love it if there was a place where you could specifically find alternatives to hyped, admittedly good but insanely pricey products that are just as good or even just almost as good but more affordable for the everyday person 👀

  • @maureengamba265
    @maureengamba265 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I recently took my ray bans in to repair and was happy to see that they can due that instead of buying a whole new pair. Levi id love to know a little more about the manufacturing of companies like Ray Ban and not just their business model.

  • @thetruthserum2816
    @thetruthserum2816 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've used the ZZ Top song "Cheap Sunglasses" as my motto for some time. I get the cheap polarized UV rated glasses, and replace them at the first sign of scratches... It eliminates the dread of losing, scratching, or damaging an expensive pair...

  • @fredperry9235
    @fredperry9235 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Stopped buying raybans when they got rid of glass lenses. It's like designer watches made by Fossil. A race to the bottom of quality. No offence but it's what happens when accounts and marketing are valued higher than other departments of large companies.

    • @andrewhudson4926
      @andrewhudson4926 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most of their sunglasses still have glass lenses? All of their most popular frames have them

  • @hagbard72
    @hagbard72 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Been using a pair of very cheap sunglasses for nearly a decade. Stopped because I didn't know if they have UV protection. Had them checked by an optometrist yesterday and they didn't let any UV pass so back to wearing them. I really like them so glad I didn't have to toss them.

  • @lopes.altamiro
    @lopes.altamiro 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    0 second of video and I hitted "Subscribe". You're good dude

  • @Joeink100
    @Joeink100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have some prescription 2-4-2 sunglasses from superdry they were expensive but they have lasted ages and I mostly wear them in night clubs when on drugs

  • @carletonrutherford1799
    @carletonrutherford1799 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The cost to actually make Ray Bans hasn't gone up that much in the last couple decades, but the price of their glasses has skyrocketed through the roof. I'm glad I bought about 5 pairs of Ray Bans about 20 years ago, for $60 Canadian each from a drugstore called London Drugs. They are original, legit, quality, and about 1/3rd the price of buying new ones. F B&L Essilor, or whatever. If I ever end up needing another pair of sunglasses I will be looking elsewhere.

    • @conbro0985
      @conbro0985 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      One word, inflation

    • @thisiswaytoocomplicated
      @thisiswaytoocomplicated 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But quality has gone down a bit, too. Current Wayfarer isn't the same quality as it was in the 90s and earlier.
      Last time I brought my early-90s Wayfarer to an optician to replace prescription glasses 2 years ago he also immediately noticed that it was an old production model from before they lowered the quality and he told me to hold on to it. Might have been the production switch to Italy but I don't know for sure.

  • @frankiesilverman
    @frankiesilverman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I used to deliver food to the Essilor building in Irving, TX…it too was dark and mysterious lol

  • @Xandrapeach
    @Xandrapeach 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love giving insightful comments that let creators know exactly what I like about their stuff, but all I can say for this is.... Good. Very good. Also, how future proof is the cannabis industry?

  • @mrrolandlawrence
    @mrrolandlawrence 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i know a guy who works in the eye industry as a wholesaler and the frames have markups of 1500& > 10000%s. the frames are stamped out, high volume & for pennies. the hinges are low cost, they will always be a weak point of failure. screws are made small on purpose because the thread will sheer off after a set time. UV400 protection is not exactly hard either to apply as a coating. what would be more fancy is to apply the opitcal coatings that people like canon / nikon apply that harden the surface of the glass to make it more scratch resistant & for optical reasons.

  • @Srirachatabasco
    @Srirachatabasco 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I often thought about that price gap you talked about and annoyed me so much that the only options were either $200+ Ray Bans or $5 petrol station.
    But after a bit of research you can fin good quality without those crazy prices.If someone is from Australia looking for good sunnies, I highly recommend Carve, they're very good glasses for around $50 to $100.

  • @carrioncrow8191
    @carrioncrow8191 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Knockaround sunglasses are fairly good for the price, and to my knowledge, they are not owned by the giant EL
    Also, I have a pair of Suncloud sunglasses that have been pretty good

  • @seanfraser9162
    @seanfraser9162 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Congrats on your 100k.
    I really enjoy your work.
    Keep going.

  • @fragrantfrog1648
    @fragrantfrog1648 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I literally liked this video. Like literally irl and I like literally liked the video by liking the like button with like my fingers. I also typed out words to like literally leave a comment. I’m also like literally subscribed because I like you and your videos so much, Levi.

  • @baldisaerodynamic9692
    @baldisaerodynamic9692 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    doochey people need these brands to feel special, because nothing screams i think im better than you because i paid $400 for a $1.32 plastic frame

  • @GregFowlerPlus
    @GregFowlerPlus 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Randolph Engineering make the best optics I've experienced in New England by hand, so if you like metal frames, you've likely noticed their aviators in many movies/TV. They're pricey, but worth it

  • @FuDiep
    @FuDiep 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    5:28 Captain* Jack Sparrow

    • @FutureProofTV
      @FutureProofTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How could we forget his official title 😭😪

  • @Cali_90s
    @Cali_90s 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i subed man. i liked the video about the water bottles, and this one too. keep it up man.

  • @peterwoods35
    @peterwoods35 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brevity is the soul of wit--that's ten minutes of my life that I'll never get back.

  • @ImmortalInflames
    @ImmortalInflames 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I still have my Oakley Juliet's which I've had for over 15 years now... damn time flies.. I only just got done with Importing some new old stock lenses from The States & genuine rubbers from Japan.. Not cheap, but wow the difference.. they really look new again!
    While in my search for the parts I ended up stumbling across a half jacket 2.0 & flak jacket 2.0 for just $30 each! (~$20 USD) the lenses were rough but everything else was great, so bought some Linegear lenses so got a couple great pairs for when mowing the grass or the project car.
    It's amazing how the Oakley "X-metal" glasses have really kept their value. It's still very easy to get replacement parts & there are even places that specialise in servicing the frames (fitting nose bridge bullets) if you are a bit faint of heart doing it yourself.
    It was a genuine sad day when Lux took over as ofcause.. they discontinued the X-metal series & now Oakley is just a shell of what it used to be.. I'll be hanging on to my Juliet's for years to come!

  • @Whodnl
    @Whodnl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I will say it again cause the video was taken down the truth of Future Proof is that they never miss on a video

    • @FutureProofTV
      @FutureProofTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We appreciate you, Daniel!!!

  • @UsernameGenerator123
    @UsernameGenerator123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I always recommend Maui Jims. The lenses really are great with polarisation and UV protection, you don't have to squint at all in bright sunlight. And they avoid EL.

    • @promisesofnever
      @promisesofnever 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Got some Maui Jim's for Christmas. Looks like when I Google it they were independent. When they shipped they came from Luxottica. Is Luxottica just the distributor?

    • @UsernameGenerator123
      @UsernameGenerator123 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@promisesofnever perhaps luxotica distributed them where you are? They were never even listed in places like sunglass hut before. Looks like they were bought though in March this year by Kering which is a shame

  • @csjrogerson2377
    @csjrogerson2377 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    How difficult it is it to design functional and fashionable sunglasses? There are only 2 moving parts and the lenses have to be in front of the eyes - both of them, one lens per eye.
    Anyone that pays $399 for a pair of sunglasses has had their brain removed or got too much money and far too little sense.

    • @J_Braz_
      @J_Braz_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your paying 389.99 for the little Ray Ban logo. And the perceived social status one associates with expensive items

    • @jackedkerouac4414
      @jackedkerouac4414 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      My mom got me a pair of $350 Porsche sunglasses but I prefer my 2 Prada knockoffs. Not because of comfort, style or better quality it's bc I won't care if I lose them

    • @csjrogerson2377
      @csjrogerson2377 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@J_Braz_ Then my second paragraph still applies.

  • @xJupitrr
    @xJupitrr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    congrats on subscribers milestones, IMO you deserve more

  • @YoSpiff
    @YoSpiff 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For riding my bicycle or driving I use a $20 USD pair of Milwaukee safety glasses from Home Depot. As good as any purpose specific sunglasses I've ever had. In fact, the only pair of Oakleys I've had fell apart within a year.

  • @Kaiser187
    @Kaiser187 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Screw those prices, period. I'm going to DHGate if I want em.

  • @SenapatiAN
    @SenapatiAN 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I feel like there's so many Luxottica videos on youtube but I keep clicking. Their greediness is just unfathomable

  • @joermnyc
    @joermnyc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It’s not just sunglasses, it’s frames for prescription glasses too. Rather than pay almost a grand for 2 pairs of glasses with transitions lenses (bright sunlight is not so great for my eyes), I checked out online glasses places and picked Zenni… got pretty much the same thing (couldn’t find polarized transitions, is that not a thing anymore?), but for $250 for 2 pairs. (My daughter wrecked my old glasses, best to have a backup. So far they are holding up about a year later. I never liked the plastic ones, always get metal.)

    • @jonevansauthor
      @jonevansauthor 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think Zenni were set up specifically to counter this trend of outrageous markups on spectacles, weren't they? I could of course be confusing them with another company.

    • @toniceyewearamerica9369
      @toniceyewearamerica9369 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tonic Eyewear, we have a copper and a grey polarized transitions.

  • @raytsh
    @raytsh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yeah, they are all made by the same company. I found our about this a few years ago and, since then, I'm actively trying to avoid anything made by Luxottica when I need new glasses or sunglasses. For the lenses, I try to stick to Zeiss, I hope they are still independent, but I'm not sure, haha.

    • @thetaomega7816
      @thetaomega7816 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      why do want to avoid them? is there some shady practice to didnt like?

    • @raytsh
      @raytsh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thetaomega7816 It is clear as glass that there are some shady things going on as illustrated in the video.

  • @TrAgicsrf
    @TrAgicsrf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Luxottica one of biggest low key monopolies

  • @nBasedAce
    @nBasedAce 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like Ray-Ban frames for the style and they are good quality. The eyeglass frames that I got were made in China. New Wayfarer Classic.