Freedom really ain't free, it takes courage and effort. Props to Mattityahu for having the courage and putting in the effort it takes to try and be free(er). I have friends who are really into the right to travel stuff and common law. It's pretty confusing stuff and seems to be hit or miss depending on how good you are at articulating the correct language to counter the state's language.
I keep saying this. It's confusing as hell itself. One thing is for sure and that is that they can't deny the fact that you're a living breathing man therefore the natural law can only apply . But, they use us all as maritime admiralty numerical product and all you need to learn is what separates The living man from the CAP letter name subject matter birth certificate, DL# SS# fiction character ID under the jurisdiction of the district of columbia .. CORPORATION 110
so using this logic, anyone, no matter what age, can drive a car, plane, helicopter, or whatever they want, because they have the right to travel. Other human beings have no right to form a government that establishes reasonable rules around these things to protect others. correct?
Great Video. It is definitely important to fight for freedom. Our constitutional rights are violated regularly by the system. It persists because we agree to allow it for the sake of convenience. I am vaguely familiar with the parse syntax language espoused by the late David Wynn Miller because I watched some TH-cam videos of his lecture. Another guy I watched was Mark Kishon Christopher. This was a peaceful and effective way to relay this information.
How did it go? Life-Live-Claim with the Correct-Syntax-Grammar for the Avoidance of perjury. I see how we corrupt our speech with improper word parse structure.
For the knowledge of the claimant I make no assumptions and no presumptions l need that in correct parse syntax grammar to avoid the perjury. Focus on the language for me it all started with the language when I heard "it depends on the definition of the word is is".
Come get even stick it too these same bankers Buy this instead of paying $PLx 🎯 10 You can be the one gaming them and they're s***** situation for once Interest rates hit margin first Punish lying underwriters that are pretended to be innocent too If it moves quick enough then you blow up them as well and their warrants
Everybody has the right to travel by what ever means we want to use. To drive a vehicle on the roads and highways you you must follow the laws of the states on having a drivers license, insurance and registration. Driving is not a right. hahahahhahahahahh thinking a birth certificate has anything to do with money. Yes you can turn in your drivers license and deregister you vehicle but if you get caught driving it you can end up having it towed and you could go to jail. This is all a bunch of nonsense
@@Audikontroller1 Driving has nothing to do with any kind of contract. Driving or traveling in your car, truck or what ever you want to call it is still driving. Look up the definition of driving. driving the act of controlling and steering the movement of a vehicle or animal DRIVER. A person actually doing driving , whether employed by owner to drive or driving his own vehicle. Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Ed. p. 445 DRIVER. A person actually doing driving , whether employed by owner to drive or driving his own vehicle. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed. p. 495 DRIVER. 1. A person who steers and propels a vehicle. 2. A person who herds animals; a drover. Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th Ed. p.510 DRIVER. 1. A person who steers and propels a vehicle. 2. A person who herds animals; a drover. Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th Ed. p. 533 Driver. A person who steers and propels a vehicle. 2. A person who herds animals; a drover. Black's Law Dictionary 9th Ed. page 569 Driver. (15c) 1. Someone who steers and propels a vehicle. 2. Someone who herds animals; a drover. 3. A piece of software that allows a computer to work with with another piece of hardware such as a mouse or a printer. Black's Law Dictionary 10th Ed. page 603
@@ronaldmead7643 above your head good sir. The words used intrap us into making a contract. If one doesn't play the game you can operate outside the game.
One thing missing in his lingo, is the status of "Non-citizen National" as opposed to the citizen of ANY "ship of state" aka "part of the crew, part of the ship" which is the basis of why one must reject their social security number and state issued documentation in order to be truly sovereign.
literally been talking about this all night! so on point! so filled with joy to know other humans are seeing past the veil! im in australia... its not a country it's an incorperation as the commonwealthof australia LLC based in washington !!!
Hey, I used to live in Australia between 2015 to 2020 and I came across David Wynn Miller In 2021 and my life has never been the same. Did you know, you can now gain access to your trust account?
It's not that spiritual to have to buy info so that you can be free. Free is without cost or payment Not controlled - if someone says you gotta pay me for info to free you that sounds.... Hmmmmm
Yes, we will most likely do an update as things progress. It really is a courageous act. I have searched for this info, and its often censored and removed from easily accessible places. Mattityahu has searched high and low to educate himself on this process, and it’s taking a lot of his time and effort to do so.
Do not hire a lawyer or re-present yourself. This gives them jurisdiction. You are there by special appearance under duress sui juris in propria persona.
Tarah: You may want to tell your friend not to go down this rabbit hole...it's 100% BS. The sovereign citizen arguments NEVER work in court. Everything he said about the law (as it relates to the right to travel) is completely misguided. He WILL NOT WIN in court with this 'right to travel' argument. Seriously, think about it: If everyone in the US had the right to drive (or travel as the sov cits like to call it) on public roads w/out a license....there's nothing to prevent 10 year old kids from drving 4,000 lb cars. He's going nowhere with this argument.
B B I hear that you already have it made up in your mind that it can’t work...It certainly wouldn’t work for you, thats 100%. It doesn’t seem logical that a 10 year olds would have easy access to obtain a 4,000 pound vehicle and run free with it, but then again, that’s your logic. Personally I find this very fascinating, and no, i will not be passing on your negativity and doubt to tell anyone what to do or not to do on their fight for freedom.
@@omensofalchemy It doesn't work...it has NEVER worked. There has NEVER been a court, judge, prosecutor, LEO, etc. that has said 'you know what, you're right...the constitution does say you can drive on the roads without having registration, insurance and a driver's license...have a nice day!' Anyways, when you and your hippie BF get pulled over and try this bullshit on LEO, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE make sure you video it....watching brainwashed SovCits get their windows smashed and subsequently riding the lightening is some of the best entertainment on TH-cam. BTW, you're not 'fighting for freedom.' Nowhere in the constitution does it say you have the right to drive on public roads...but spin it however you'd like if it makes you feel better.
hey yall Yeah.....I’m going to call you a liar. That’s not true. You don’t have friends. Ha, I kid. All that means, if your friend said that, is your little friend is a brainwashed sovcit that works for the govt. Probably not the first time a closet sovcit works for the government and it still doesn’t mean its true. And I’ll ask you the same that I’ve asked the aforementioned sovcits: post a link to one single case where a judge ruled in favor of a sovcit based on the merits. Again, I can show you PLENTY of cases where sovcits have lost. So, please, post a link to one case.
hey yall I have no idea what you’re talking about, please post a link to the case. Automobiles have been on the the road since the early 1900s and there have literally been millions of court cases regarding highway safety and traffic laws. If what you say is true, I’m sure you can find at least one case that the judge ruled in the defendants favor based on the merits. Again, please post one single case where the judge ruled that a driver does not need a license to drive and/or it’s unconstitutional for a state to require people to have a drivers license. Out of the literally millions of court cases, I’m sure you can find one, right?
Listen man. You can do everything this guy says with great success. But you have A WHOLE LOT OF GRAMMAR (a whole other language, and you MUST have all of your avenues taken care of or they wont care. They will just do what they want to you anyway.
It is retarded nonsense .If you really think a judge will listen to this puerile stupidity , you're deluded .All words in court are what the man in the street would take them as .
:YES, FOR THE USE OF THE QUANTUM-GRAMMAR IS WITH THE SOLUTION OF THIS YOUNG-MAN WITH THE LEGAL-SYSTEM-CONFLICT BY THE COURTS-TRICKERY. [BUT IT IS NOT WISE TO DRIVE WITHOUT INSURANCE, UNLESS YOU HAVE 10 MILLION EQUITY TO BOND YOUR VEHICLE , ROADS ARE ALL ABOUT PUBLIC SAFETY.]
@@monkman369 its not about trying... it's not legally sound in any way. It's based on crackpot theories passed on like a game of telephone. If not why hasn't a case made it to the Supreme court?
Come get even stick it too these same bankers Buy this instead of paying $PLx 🎯 10 You can be the one gaming them and they're s***** situation for once Interest rates hit margin first Punish lying underwriters that are pretended to be innocent too If it moves quick enough then you blow up them as well and their warrants
Freedom really ain't free, it takes courage and effort. Props to Mattityahu for having the courage and putting in the effort it takes to try and be free(er).
I have friends who are really into the right to travel stuff and common law. It's pretty confusing stuff and seems to be hit or miss depending on how good you are at articulating the correct language to counter the state's language.
I keep saying this. It's confusing as hell itself. One thing is for sure and that is that they can't deny the fact that you're a living breathing man therefore the natural law can only apply . But, they use us all as maritime admiralty numerical product and all you need to learn is what separates The living man from the CAP letter name subject matter birth certificate, DL# SS# fiction character ID under the jurisdiction of the district of columbia .. CORPORATION 110
This guy is good. And the lady is a great listener ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤. I know it already but the revision is priceless.
so using this logic, anyone, no matter what age, can drive a car, plane, helicopter, or whatever they want, because they have the right to travel. Other human beings have no right to form a government that establishes reasonable rules around these things to protect others. correct?
Honorable Man! Thank you! Thank you for sharing! 🙏
Great Video. It is definitely important to fight for freedom. Our constitutional rights are violated regularly by the system. It persists because we agree to allow it for the sake of convenience. I am vaguely familiar with the parse syntax language espoused by the late David Wynn Miller because I watched some TH-cam videos of his lecture. Another guy I watched was Mark Kishon Christopher. This was a peaceful and effective way to relay this information.
How did it go? Life-Live-Claim with the Correct-Syntax-Grammar for the Avoidance of perjury. I see how we corrupt our speech with improper word parse structure.
Bro , it's "For the VOIDANCE of THE Perjury. " not the Avoidance. K. See. 18 USC ,1001 . fictitious conveyance of language.
🤣😂 nobody actually cares about this complete nonsense. Get help seriously.
Reference?
@@clinton867 where do u learn this for free?
@@WarlockHolmes420 ur name has "weed" in it. Keep defending the criminals.
For the knowledge of the claimant I make no assumptions and no presumptions l need that in correct parse syntax grammar to avoid the perjury. Focus on the language for me it all started with the language when I heard "it depends on the definition of the word is is".
Come get even stick it too these same bankers
Buy this instead of paying $PLx 🎯 10
You can be the one gaming them and they're s***** situation for once
Interest rates hit margin first
Punish lying underwriters that are pretended to be innocent too
If it moves quick enough then you blow up them as well and their warrants
Stop talking nonsense .
All seven elements of a lawful contract must exist
Isn't there 8?
Everybody has the right to travel by what ever means we want to use. To drive a vehicle on the roads and highways you you must follow the laws of the states on having a drivers license, insurance and registration. Driving is not a right. hahahahhahahahahh thinking a birth certificate has anything to do with money. Yes you can turn in your drivers license and deregister you vehicle but if you get caught driving it you can end up having it towed and you could go to jail. This is all a bunch of nonsense
Driving means to contract, contract is commercial intercourse. Do this and you contract. traveling in your personal conveyance is not contractible!
@@Audikontroller1 Driving has nothing to do with any kind of contract. Driving or traveling in your car, truck or what ever you want to call it is still driving. Look up the definition of driving. driving
the act of controlling and steering the movement of a vehicle or animal DRIVER. A person actually doing driving , whether employed by owner to drive or driving his own vehicle. Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Ed. p. 445
DRIVER. A person actually doing driving , whether employed by owner to drive or driving his own vehicle. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed. p. 495
DRIVER. 1. A person who steers and propels a vehicle. 2. A person who herds animals; a drover. Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th Ed. p.510
DRIVER. 1. A person who steers and propels a vehicle. 2. A person who herds animals; a drover. Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th Ed. p. 533
Driver. A person who steers and propels a vehicle. 2. A person who herds animals; a drover. Black's Law Dictionary 9th Ed. page 569
Driver. (15c) 1. Someone who steers and propels a vehicle. 2. Someone who herds animals; a drover. 3. A piece of software that allows a computer to work with with another piece of hardware such as a mouse or a printer. Black's Law Dictionary 10th Ed. page 603
@@ronaldmead7643 above your head good sir. The words used intrap us into making a contract. If one doesn't play the game you can operate outside the game.
@@Levo42691 it is the law on every state and the supreme court has up held it
@@ronaldmead7643 doesn't mean the Supreme Court has the authority to do what it pleases.
Nonsense from word one . (She has very long fingers!)
Why don't you and your free soul freely roam into a very deep pit?
One thing missing in his lingo, is the status of "Non-citizen National" as opposed to the citizen of ANY "ship of state" aka "part of the crew, part of the ship" which is the basis of why one must reject their social security number and state issued documentation in order to be truly sovereign.
None of that is true... it is picking and choosing laws and regulations.
thank you! was looking for this comment
literally been talking about this all night! so on point! so filled with joy to know other humans are seeing past the veil! im in australia... its not a country it's an incorperation as the commonwealthof australia LLC based in washington !!!
correct as well as The NZ Company ,Colonial House.
It's embarrasssing nonsense . How can people believe this puerile drivel from these half-wits ?
Yeah nah. Everybody thinks this is insane. And it is. It's also painfully incorrect.
Hey, I used to live in Australia between 2015 to 2020 and I came across David Wynn Miller In 2021 and my life has never been the same.
Did you know, you can now gain access to your trust account?
I’m interested in what “studying” is to this dude
It's not that spiritual to have to buy info so that you can be free. Free is without cost or payment
Not controlled - if someone says you gotta pay me for info to free you that sounds.... Hmmmmm
How is that syntax grammar going for you?
It's not a movement it's a lifestyle
In legal dictionaries there are like 70 definitions for sis vice in the English language dictionary maybe 2.
Great job man! Check out Kirk's Law Corner! He is my mentor
I was taught without prejudice.
I would love to hear a update on his case. I bet he gets it dismissed.
Yes, we will most likely do an update as things progress. It really is a courageous act. I have searched for this info, and its often censored and removed from easily accessible places. Mattityahu has searched high and low to educate himself on this process, and it’s taking a lot of his time and effort to do so.
We’re all your friends ☀️
Do not hire a lawyer or re-present yourself. This gives them jurisdiction. You are there by special appearance under duress sui juris in propria persona.
Yeah , of course that'll swing it .....
Yep , that should get you a not guilty.
@@normanpearson8753 ur still not listening to the video or have read any case law yet.
Tarah: You may want to tell your friend not to go down this rabbit hole...it's 100% BS. The sovereign citizen arguments NEVER work in court. Everything he said about the law (as it relates to the right to travel) is completely misguided. He WILL NOT WIN in court with this 'right to travel' argument. Seriously, think about it: If everyone in the US had the right to drive (or travel as the sov cits like to call it) on public roads w/out a license....there's nothing to prevent 10 year old kids from drving 4,000 lb cars. He's going nowhere with this argument.
B B I hear that you already have it made up in your mind that it can’t work...It certainly wouldn’t work for you, thats 100%. It doesn’t seem logical that a 10 year olds would have easy access to obtain a 4,000 pound vehicle and run free with it, but then again, that’s your logic. Personally I find this very fascinating, and no, i will not be passing on your negativity and doubt to tell anyone what to do or not to do on their fight for freedom.
@@omensofalchemy It doesn't work...it has NEVER worked. There has NEVER been a court, judge, prosecutor, LEO, etc. that has said 'you know what, you're right...the constitution does say you can drive on the roads without having registration, insurance and a driver's license...have a nice day!' Anyways, when you and your hippie BF get pulled over and try this bullshit on LEO, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE make sure you video it....watching brainwashed SovCits get their windows smashed and subsequently riding the lightening is some of the best entertainment on TH-cam. BTW, you're not 'fighting for freedom.' Nowhere in the constitution does it say you have the right to drive on public roads...but spin it however you'd like if it makes you feel better.
bb, I know multiple people who have gotten their cases dismissed using this method. and they are still driving around without lic reg and insurance.
hey yall
Yeah.....I’m going to call you a liar. That’s not true. You don’t have friends.
Ha, I kid. All that means, if your friend said that, is your little friend is a brainwashed sovcit that works for the govt. Probably not the first time a closet sovcit works for the government and it still doesn’t mean its true.
And I’ll ask you the same that I’ve asked the aforementioned sovcits: post a link to one single case where a judge ruled in favor of a sovcit based on the merits. Again, I can show you PLENTY of cases where sovcits have lost. So, please, post a link to one case.
hey yall
I have no idea what you’re talking about, please post a link to the case.
Automobiles have been on the the road since the early 1900s and there have literally been millions of court cases regarding highway safety and traffic laws. If what you say is true, I’m sure you can find at least one case that the judge ruled in the defendants favor based on the merits. Again, please post one single case where the judge ruled that a driver does not need a license to drive and/or it’s unconstitutional for a state to require people to have a drivers license. Out of the literally millions of court cases, I’m sure you can find one, right?
Is there an update on this? Thanks.
👏👏👏👏👏👏 that boy is on point!! 🔥🔥🔥
you cant travel by foot all you want, just not in a car
wow. y'all finessed yourselves. lol
Good job young lad.
Word salad
They use word salad to mislead us. Never tell them you understand
I would love to have a woman like her by my side, so beautiful and smart
She's a silly half wit .
Failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted
Listen man. You can do everything this guy says with great success. But you have A WHOLE LOT OF GRAMMAR (a whole other language, and you MUST have all of your avenues taken care of or they wont care. They will just do what they want to you anyway.
It is retarded nonsense .If you really think a judge will listen to this puerile stupidity , you're deluded .All words in court are what the man in the street would take them as .
@@normanpearson8753 liar you've never heard of styles manuals
Land air water
Love the video! Thank you. It really touched me. I have been going to court for three years on WNY territory. Check out my Right to Travel playlist.
Syntax everything and the criminal run corporations are done. Thats pretty much every single one in the world haha! xD
No not really
Rule 12 b 6
You were traveling... driving is a commercial activity that requires licensing
Travel is not driving
Funny how every judge in the country disagrees .
@@normanpearson8753 go to law school learn to lie in court file a motion swear on the bible and constitution or just use an affidavit.
My dollar bill doesn’t say “ in service of the new world order.” Are you sure it’s the one dollar bill? ❤
The reality as we know it.metal moving collision ouch hospital and reimbursements for nurses n drs.how in God's will do we all get along?
ouch hospital indeed
Also what you are saying. Must be of like kind to bring a cause of action.
Correct sentence structure communication parse syntax grammar
:YES,
FOR THE USE OF THE QUANTUM-GRAMMAR IS WITH THE SOLUTION OF THIS YOUNG-MAN WITH THE LEGAL-SYSTEM-CONFLICT BY THE COURTS-TRICKERY. [BUT IT IS NOT WISE TO DRIVE WITHOUT INSURANCE, UNLESS YOU HAVE 10 MILLION EQUITY TO BOND YOUR VEHICLE , ROADS ARE ALL ABOUT PUBLIC SAFETY.]
@@brentjames7600 [time and space are functions of ones conceptual scheme ]
No!!!! You are totally legal to travel, they are working fraudulently
Thanks for this. Good info.
It is drivel. Sovcits are laughed out of court.
Don't rely on any of this, none of this is real.
@@adamr149 Yah? How do you know? Have you tried any of it?
@@monkman369 its not about trying... it's not legally sound in any way. It's based on crackpot theories passed on like a game of telephone. If not why hasn't a case made it to the Supreme court?
@@adamr149 well mine never made it. Cops leave me alone now though. There is no crackpot theories here. Trust me.
the state ownes your car that is why they can take it
pleading is begging its guilty or inicent...
This is all gibberish . It has never worked in a real court.
They use 3 points of contact to create a tacit agreement
Peterson v Peterson 2014 statute's, ordinances, and codes are not law.
I date a very pretty woman that n Ashland Oregon
She's cute and the guy's pretty bright too.
not really
@@Fnidner hilarious. Lol.
Parsing Syntaxe is very real.
Come get even stick it too these same bankers
Buy this instead of paying $PLx 🎯 10
You can be the one gaming them and they're s***** situation for once
Interest rates hit margin first
Punish lying underwriters that are pretended to be innocent too
If it moves quick enough then you blow up them as well and their warrants
Take back your square
Of course it is .( dduuuhhh)
Feels like the trees near the Angel Baths above the creek 🤙🏻