How a hand tool split the woodworking world

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
  • Thanks to SunPower for sponsoring this video and partnering with me to go solar. If you want to learn what going solar could look like for you, visit:
    sunpower.go2cl...
    And if you've got questions for Ol' Sonny, drop 'em in the comment section below!
    Router planes. A criminally underrated tool. But which router plane is the best? And is the Katz-Moses router plane any good? We're taking a deep dive into the Big 3, disassembling each and exploring the differences, and seeing how the JKM router plane compares to the best in the game. Hope it's helpful for you!
    Thanks for watching! If you enjoyed this video please consider supporting my channel by subscribing and hitting that notification bell. It really helps small channels like mine.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Items I keep on hand in the shop (some are affiliate links which help sponsor this content):
    Glue:
    Titebond I Wood Glue: amzn.to/3zRXHGv
    Titebond III Wood Glue: amzn.to/3MVnG6j
    Titebond Quick and Thick: amzn.to/42HGuMC
    Liquid Hide Glue: amzn.to/3PhZEEW
    TotalBoat Epoxy:
    For 5% off any TotalBoat product, visit www.totalboat....
    My Finish Mix:
    Minwax Polyurethane: amzn.to/3kPgpuO
    Liberon Finishing Oil: amzn.to/3kXkIEf
    Danish Oil (alternative): amzn.to/3Njlabs
    Liberon Beeswax: amzn.to/3Jm2yFN
    Turpentine: amzn.to/3SWFznB
    Mineral Spirits (alternative): amzn.to/3oKU83h
    Power Tools and Accessories:
    Festool Domino: amzn.to/47YEty0
    Table Saw Blade - Woodworkers II: amzn.to/42bIOLa
    My favorite trim router: amzn.to/3LbCbTF
    DeWalt Trim Router fence: amzn.to/43cYwr2
    My Festool Router Setup: amzn.to/3ZPIQal
    Extra Fence: amzn.to/3KHi9jI
    1/2" dia Router bit: amzn.to/3UkRFYI
    A Better Alternative (Spiral Up Cut): amzn.to/3mcPsSp
    Sharpening:
    Ohishi Waterstones: amzn.to/3TkoZhP
    1,000/8,000 Combo (great budget option): amzn.to/3Lqj7Sh
    Angle Setting Jig Plans: www.lie-nielse...
    Inexpensive Honing Guide: amzn.to/3Jo2Uub
    Lie-Nieslen Honing Guide: www.lie-nielse... guide
    Sandpaper for Flattening: amzn.to/3Jor73F
    You can stay up to date with my work here:
    / encurtis​
    / encurtis
    encurtis.com/

ความคิดเห็น • 479

  • @mikegrawvunder6346
    @mikegrawvunder6346 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Years ago, a 70-year-old cabinet maker was selling all his tools. I got two router planes in boxes for about $30 for both. One was a Stanley and I think the other was Miller Falls. Both with full sets of irons. Plus a few extra irons he made himself. Really love how they work. I do reach for the Stanley more than the other one. I also got a No. 7 Bench plane in a case he made for it. The case is a thing of beauty in itself.

  • @katalytically
    @katalytically 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    For someone who doesn't own a router plane this is an informative video, both in the history of the router plane but about the various models you reviewed. Good info on what you find to be positive features and negative features which is useful in choosing one of those planes, or a plane from a different brand as I now know for which features to check. Because you stayed with the differences between the planes, and what features you like, I didn't get a sense you were recommending one over the other, with the exception of the Stanley. So thanks for the review and history lesson.

  • @JamesWilliams-en3os
    @JamesWilliams-en3os 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    I have used the Veritas router plane for some time, and I love it. I saw JKM’s video on his new router plane last year and he sold me… so now I have both, and used both on a major project (a pair of Mission style bookcases). I had both router planes out on my bench, and just picked up whichever one was handy for whichever dado or tenon cheek I was working on at that moment. After a while I realized I was reaching for the Veritas tool preferentially. Why? Because the adjustment screw on the Veritas turns the correct way, apparently. With the JKM I invariably move the blade up first when I want it to go down, and vice versa. Also, the finer control of the thread pitch on the Veritas plane is better… as anyone who hand-cuts tenons knows, a tissue-paper-thin shaving can be the difference between a perfect fit into the mortise and starting all over again with a new piece of stock. So I am probably going to sell my JKM router plane. Oh, and I don’t care about the controversies, China vs US/Canada, or whether JKM is a nice guy or not. I just like the Veritas tool better.

    • @GeeDeeBird
      @GeeDeeBird 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Thanks for an actual, unambiguous opinion supported by objective fact.

    • @twcmaker
      @twcmaker 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I like this reply. At the end of the day it's how the tool performs and feels in use.

    • @josh8494
      @josh8494 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Thanks for the input. I don’t care about the controversy, it’s just people looking for things to be angry about. I appreciate your summary on the function of the tools and their differences. It is a good write up and I think your points are well thought out.

    • @ohasis8331
      @ohasis8331 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I have much the same experience, having a lot of Veritas stuff. I had need of a larger router plane and my local supplier had none in stock (covid supply chain backlog) The JKM came out and was about forty bucks cheaper in my currency so thought I'd give it ago. End result is much the same as yours. My JKM is up for sale, my Veritas feels better to me.

  • @anthonydtobias
    @anthonydtobias 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Because I am from Maine I bought the Lie-Neilson at their headquarters. No regrets. I figured though that if I bought the Veritas that I wouldn't really notice that much of a difference... At the end of the day I was glad to support a local business. Keep on doing your thing, I enjoy your videos! ✌️

  • @ChrisBombria
    @ChrisBombria 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    For me the router plane has always been a cleanup tool. Take the bulk away however you want. Come in with a router plane to ensure a consistent depth of the groove. As long as the cutting iron is sharp, square and secure I'm happy.

    • @rickhayhoe
      @rickhayhoe 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yes!

  • @faraz2498
    @faraz2498 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I had an issue with the blade on my JKM tool, I contacted them just wanting a replacement blade. They sent me a whole new plane and 2 new blades. The support was excellent, great company to deal with.

  • @jas20per
    @jas20per 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    From an old school Brit very well done. I would just like to say I purchased the Stanley in the late 1950s in Britain there was no real choice of manufacturer. I have noticed from your video the plane or should I give it its very old name "Old Woman's Tooth" is now used for complete removal of the joint wood, in my day that was the job of a cranked chisel if producing a straight slot. The Stanley was used for levelling the bottom of the slot to the required depth. As for sharpening the blade, a standard oil stone for the flat bottom and a small slip stone tor the the top angle. Modifications done on mine over time, the adjustment thread and nut were changed to Metric fine thread and the adjustment nut made larger out of Brass also I have forgotten the number of times it has hit the floor being knocked of the bench . So just another slant on a well talked over subject, food for thought I did say at work in my younger day that I was going to purchase one of those new DIY electric hand drills one older and wiser worker said to me "They did not have that type of thing in Chippendale's workshop and we still cant come near his quality today".

  • @billengland1183
    @billengland1183 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    One of my morning pleasures is sitting down at the computer with a cup of coffee and learning from one of your videos. You have an marvelous style and presentation and I appreciate you sharing your experience and approaches. You also have a cooler coffee mug than me!

    • @ENCurtis
      @ENCurtis  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you!

  • @tobiasfrancisco5879
    @tobiasfrancisco5879 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    The thing that doesn't make sense to me is the price point. Manufacturing in china is cheaper, yes? Than why doesn't the price reflect that. Just like bridge city, they manufacture in china now, but their prices are ridiculous. When you pay for a Lie Nielsen, or a Veritas you know that they are providing safe working conditions and adequate compensation for their employees thus the higher cost to consumers.

    • @dwainlambrigger3769
      @dwainlambrigger3769 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are many variables in pricing. How many units does JKM order at a time? Double that number and I'll bet that pricing will come down. Just because something is made in China means it's cheap. It often is, but my belief is that China will build what you require, regardless of pricing. I would guess the same is true for Bridge City. I can't see a big demand for their products.

    • @digitalmunky
      @digitalmunky 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Manufacturing in China IS cheaper, but guess what MOST people don't think about? The manufacturers/producers of the product are factoring overall cost to produce, advertise, distribute, and sell those items. From 100's of thousands to millions of units... So fractions of a dollar still often may equal millions. Cost to manufacturer will be considerably cheaper in China, BUT then cost of shipping and distribution from overseas eats up a considerable amount of those savings... Add to that popularity of the product along with greed and it's a recipe for holes in one's pockets.

  • @davewest6788
    @davewest6788 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Well done video and well produced. Best integration for a sponsor I have ever seen so far.

    • @loubonaparte5063
      @loubonaparte5063 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you mean best sucking up you've ever seen??? lol

    • @loubonaparte5063
      @loubonaparte5063 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Having said that... your skill and knowledge is vast, and I simply can't look away.... I just wish you'd change your style a smidge because I feel your skills far outweigh your gimicky presentation... great hair and beard though!!!! and Bi's and Tri's....lol.... Call you man of mystery.

  • @jimwilliams2682
    @jimwilliams2682 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Now, you need to try Paul Seller's and Rex Krueger's router planes. Old timey wooden bodies.

    • @bluecollaruniversity
      @bluecollaruniversity 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Paul Sellers router plane is not only simple, I like that the blade is straight stock... Easier to sharpen.

    • @davidmcrae4791
      @davidmcrae4791 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It seems hard to make :( I'm not really sure how to buy the parts

  • @jimgott119
    @jimgott119 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I purchased the Katz-Moses plane after seeing his TH-cam video touting its improvements. I already owned the Lie Nielsen, but it looked like an improvement so I ordered it. When it came it was not to my liking. His claim of absolutely no backlash was not what I experienced at all. But the most disturbing thing was that the blade carriage was not at right angles to the sole so it
    made an angled stepped cut across the bottom of the groove. This was the case with both blades. I sent him an email with photos and my phone number, asking him to call me to discuss it. He would not. He kept asking questions via email. I told him that I wanted to have a live conversation which would be more productive and again asked him to call me. He would not. I gave up and returned it for a refund.

  • @SeanRefsnider
    @SeanRefsnider 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Is there an award for best ad?? If so, you should win.

    • @ENCurtis
      @ENCurtis  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      much obliged my good man!

  • @brianhmonks
    @brianhmonks 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Made by Chinese manufacturer Hongdui. Hongdui is actually making good products with some innovative features. The Hongdui sells go $230 and the LN is $250. If your decision making is based on dollars, the KM could be your choice. For me, buying the best, US made and the difference is only $20, it’s a no brainer to get the LN.

    • @ENCurtis
      @ENCurtis  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolutely fair point on which to make a decision.

  • @robertberger8642
    @robertberger8642 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent review with compare & contrast. Thanks.

  • @JeffFontecchio
    @JeffFontecchio 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for taking the time to make this video!

    • @ENCurtis
      @ENCurtis  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks jeff!

  • @danielaltieri8089
    @danielaltieri8089 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    I love you address your biases and you did it in such a friendly way. I also LOVE how you start with the point that Stanley just took a proven set of design options from a tool that existed in some form to mass produce…just like the more modern versions. I have an older refurbed “no-name” router plane that’s perfectly functional but would make a purchase to support someone like JKM because I like his content and drive to innovate and support this community.

    • @jimcarter4929
      @jimcarter4929 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It looks like an Australian company is making a metal version of Paul Sellers plane. Same blade design, same locking design, pretty much a copy. I think Vic may be selling them in Canada and the U.S.

  • @willemkossen
    @willemkossen 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    That is a great comparison. I like routerplanes. Ever since i made my own, i started collecting video's about making routerplanes in a playlist. I will add this one to the list, as it give great perspective on the tools. If people want to make their own routerplane, the list is a helpful resource. Cheers!

    • @ENCurtis
      @ENCurtis  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! Glad you found it useful.

  • @privatetoddmason-darnell7187
    @privatetoddmason-darnell7187 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Really appreciate the video. I had decided that a router plane was my next purchase. I was stuck in analysis paralysis and as with most other tool purchases, once you get to higher levels, it really is personal preference.

    • @ENCurtis
      @ENCurtis  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      once you get past budget, personal preference is 100% of the game. They are all essentially the same from a function perspective.

  • @Aaron-nj4ou
    @Aaron-nj4ou 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    My personal opinion is this. Everyone buys stuff from overseas, it is unavoidable. However when it comes to tools that I will buy once and hopefully pass down to my children I will absol-friggin-lutely buy a tool that is made in Canada (where I live) or US (if I lived there) compared to something overseas. That is a no brainer for me. As a Canadian the Veritas router plane is actually cheaper than KM’s (exchange, shipping, warranty, return etc) but even if it wasn’t I would still gladly pay more for domestic manufacturing (and I have for other tools) and in my experience the quality is second to none. I have regretted cheaper tools on many occasions, I have never regretted buying an expensive tool. Erik absolutely awesome discussion and another excellent video.

    • @RyanWattersRyanWatters
      @RyanWattersRyanWatters 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      100%. It’s the reason I buy JessEm as an American. The KM router plane isn’t about innovation and production quality; it’s about disproportionate profit margin, which comes at the cost of further moving all means of production overseas.

    • @chuckgrumble5440
      @chuckgrumble5440 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      very important to me as well and I feel the need to snatch up USA made stuff before its too late!

    • @chipsterb4946
      @chipsterb4946 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@RyanWattersRyanWattersyour comment hits the nail on the head. If I buy CCP made crap at Walmart, the price is significantly lower.

    • @TenaciousGeebs
      @TenaciousGeebs 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      100% agree my friend. I am in the UK and will only seek out those hand tools which are either US, Canada or UK made, with no overseas manufacturing/assembly input. More than happy to spend the money to pay for good craftsmanship!

    • @ENCurtis
      @ENCurtis  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Totally fair point of view from which to operate. And as a small American business, I appreciate you supporting small businesses. LV and LN both make excellent tools. You won't go wrong with either.

  • @Kernowwoods
    @Kernowwoods 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A pleasure as always dude. Love the honesty. Love the video 🤙

    • @ENCurtis
      @ENCurtis  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you.

  • @SleepyHuskyStudio
    @SleepyHuskyStudio 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As a very new woodworker, I started this video with no idea what a router plane was. Now I desperately want one.
    Eric, my wife is very angry with you for fueling my addictions.

  • @christopherharrison6724
    @christopherharrison6724 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I made my own which is extremely useful with depth adjustment .

  • @keithc1335
    @keithc1335 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Love your maturity. Great video!

  • @petevonschondorf4609
    @petevonschondorf4609 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Qualification - I'm cheap. I hardly buy new tools but when I do, and sometimes unsuccessfully, I look at the metal quality and the ability to sharpen the tool. Address in future tool videos this it would help me. I really like the video.

  • @Ridire
    @Ridire 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I was a bit confused watching this, as it appears the KM-17 has actually changed it's castings and handles from earlier in the year. Watch anyone elses review from earlier in the year and the body is identical to the veritas, including the handle no screws on top.
    So it appears that they have changed the plane in response to the critisism. Which would imply that the criticism had merit. I think this video is doing you a diservice, as you never touched on the original version of the plane being identically shaped.

  • @joshuarobertson5514
    @joshuarobertson5514 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for the video. Love the mug!😊

  • @ga5743
    @ga5743 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Excellent video today thank you. I own the Lie Nielsen and I also own the Veritas miniature router plane now that one is my favorite 😊

  • @ChrisHornberger
    @ChrisHornberger 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I truly had no idea people are irked about JKM making tools. That's... weird. I love the things I've gotten from him, and I think he's a good dude doing good works.

  • @blayne2029
    @blayne2029 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice. More of these videos. I, personally, have not enjoyed good customer service from a JKM purchase. That would be the deciding factor for me. Veritas and Lie Nielsen customer service is outstanding. You can buy them with confidence.

  • @seanpatterson1609
    @seanpatterson1609 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for this video and your input. I alleviate hearing about experience with different tools, especially in what makes them unique. I also appreciate your style.

  • @1deerndingo
    @1deerndingo 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    FWI: 1. The edge guide on the Stanley locks into the grooves in the base. It doesn't just swivel around. 2. The open mouth clears (is not impeded by) any shavings at the end of a stopped dado so as to allow the blade to cut to the end of the dado without having to stop and remove shavings. If I didn't have two hand routers already I'd buy J. K-M's in a flash. Great tool. Great price.

  • @garethmcneill5132
    @garethmcneill5132 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm in Northern & bought the Katz Moses version recently. My first router plane. It has changed his I work and made my housings & other journey so much more accurate. I love it.
    My only complaint is that even after paying postage & shipping with KMT, I was charged an import fee by the delivery service. This added £50 (circa 75 usd) just to receive the package. Has made me reluctant to order additional sizes of blades

    • @ENCurtis
      @ENCurtis  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Totally fair. Glad it has been a good tool for you though!

  • @ChetKloss
    @ChetKloss 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Curtis, I very much enjoyed this video and your take on the subject matter. Personally I use the Veritas as my work horse but I have the mini version from Lie-Nielsen that I use a ton as well.
    Again, good job and keep up the great videos.

  • @jonavedian1027
    @jonavedian1027 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Would love to hear thoughts on wood body routers, a la Paul Sellers or Rex Kruger, both of which have plans and kits available. I have parts for a Sellers, just sitting behind a bunch of other projects.

  • @osliverpool
    @osliverpool 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    A couple of months ago, I got a great fleamarket buy... A Record version of the Stanley, in excellent condition, for £5 (~$6.30). (I'm not a furniture maker, just a DIY guy, and it's plenty good enough for me.)

    • @ENCurtis
      @ENCurtis  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hell yes dude. Love a good flea market find!

  • @TheWeekendWoodshop
    @TheWeekendWoodshop 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have a router plane...just a cheap one that I got off Amazon and it works well for my needs. But I completely agree that it is a necessity in the shop. As to the topic of "design ripoff" I don't see it as stealing per se. Innovation is essential and what JKM has done with his router plane is what he feels makes the tool better. Is it for everyone? No, certainly not. But it works for him and for at the very least thousands of others in the craft. And that's ok. To each his own as they say 😁
    Great video as always. You have become one of my favorite fellow creators. The topics you cover and the way you cover them is truly inspirational. Cheers!

  • @michaelm210
    @michaelm210 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Beginner woodworker here. Literally just yesterday found a new-in-box Stanley in my late FIL’s shop. Then I watch this video the next day 😆

  • @mikeyates1450
    @mikeyates1450 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great review. I happen to own the Veritas and love it. Been woodworking fot 60 years and find most times similar tools come down to best price and comfort in use. Keep doing your videos like you do and I wish you success. The most anyone can expect from you is honest and frank opinions and you do that well.

  • @5ElementsWoodworking
    @5ElementsWoodworking 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for this video! You've made it super clear which one I should buy with your strong opinions presented.

  • @keving8682
    @keving8682 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for the video - much appreciated! I have not read all of the comments, but I think one of biggest controversies was that Hongdui/JKM made what appeared to be an exact copy of the Veritas base. The one in your video is version 2. I purchased version 1 the day JKM announced it because I liked the zero backlash adjustment which I think was an improvement to the router plane. Version 1 also does not have the depth stop. Had they started with version 2, like the one you are showing, I think there would have been a lot less controversy.

  • @fladder1
    @fladder1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for saving me money! I actually didn't know these existed until I saw your video. I was about to buy a power router, because i need to make a few grooves, and well tools always come in handy.
    But instead i bought a Veritas miniature plane. Because it's big enough for my current needs, and no noise!!

  • @brandicolbert6932
    @brandicolbert6932 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a Stanley large router plane No.71-1/2 (PAT D) mfg 10-29-1901 that my grandfather used, along with many other wood working hand tools he used in his early 20s. He was Born in Germany in 1879, migrated to this country, and became a citizen with his family . Apprenticed and worked as the cabinet maker. As a very young boy he schooled me in the use of these same tools. I inherited all of his hand tools and I plan on giving them to my grandson. I no longer use the tools but still work in my shop with up to date machine and hand tools. I am 86 yrs old and still build custom furniture now for family and friends

  • @214rwoz
    @214rwoz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Properly Educated Jointers, I like the sound of that ! Thank you for all your time and effort. Yours, 1 in 7..

  • @royunderwood7514
    @royunderwood7514 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video. Definitely gave me some useful insight into these router planes. Thank you.

  • @cobtheconqueror
    @cobtheconqueror 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great neutral review on all of them. Pros and cons of each. I appreciate when after explaining your preference, you explained why someone may have a different preference. We May have the same muscle memory for this action but opposite muscle memory for a different action.

  • @Raul28153
    @Raul28153 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    from an engineering position I can explain why the tap set is way better than the screw adjust for depth.
    It's all about friction and stored energy. Thee tap set approach overcomes the phenomena called "Stiction" in the instant of the tap. Stictioin is term coined to describe stored energy that is held back by friction. In the medical device industry it is a major pain for precision metered delivery systems that use conventional syringes. The syringe rubber boot doesn't move until the amount of force builds up sufficiently to move it and then it moves suddenly and too much.
    A similar phenomena arises in screw advance systems such as you have there. Because things are not in perfect in-line alignment the tendency for the parts to accumulate lateral accumulated energy and deflect when the screws are adjusted, while the blade tension function is engaged, the energy to move the blade is not expressed all at the same time and that residual energy stored in the bent or cocked components can work itself out and move the blade while it in use.

  • @gcranston83
    @gcranston83 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    There's a Wood by Wright video where he says that looseness in the depth adjuster in the Stanely is deliberate to give you that 'right' amount to increase your depth of cut. Maybe someone else has the link handy?

  • @AnonymousUser1776
    @AnonymousUser1776 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The slop in the Stanley adjustment is actually a feature.
    With the blade tightened in place you can move the adjuster down a tiny amount, then you loosen the iron, and it falls the amount you moved the knob.
    Then tighten up and proceed. That was their system of micro adjusting.

    •  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      someone's been watching Wright :) Tested the slop feauture and damn, wish I knew it sooner

    • @AnonymousUser1776
      @AnonymousUser1776 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Exactly right….. er…. Wright.

    • @ENCurtis
      @ENCurtis  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Fair enough. Still not my preferred method, but I can appreciate that approach.

  • @thomasnichols7788
    @thomasnichols7788 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well just thanks a lot!!!! My wife was listening in on this podcast and started laughing herself silly. She now calls me an SNOB! I have to admit I do hold turners, carvers, scollsawers (is that a real word), and (spit on the floor) CNC users less than real woodworkers. I have been designing and making furniture for decades and now have to admit I have become an elitist. I don't mind being humbled but this is the last time I am listening to your podcast without headphones. My wife and not stopped calling me a snob!!! LOL! keep up the good work. Now where is my Scotch?

  • @lawrencedeleurere4427
    @lawrencedeleurere4427 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    The movement on the Stanley is a feature, not a bug. Take your shaving, keep the collet tight and lower the depth adjuster until it bottoms out on the blade. Then loosen the collet, it will drop slightly and retighten. You'll now be at the perfect depth for the next shave.
    Also, I think that you misread the dislike of the JKM. I think it largely has to do with the partnership with Hongdui. In the manner of pretty much every Chinese factory out there, the first thing they did was unbrand it and put it on Banggood for 160 bucks. This is typical for Hongdui. They have a direct rip-off of the Veritas dovetail guide, they ripped off the Jessem table saw guides, Bridge City's kerfmaker. It's just what they do, let someone else do the IP work and then blatantly rip it off and undercut them on price. JKM feeding into Hongdui feels like not just a betrayal of western companies, but something that will discourage innovation and hurt woodworkers in years to come. It's just not a good thing.

    • @dereklong801
      @dereklong801 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If its not patented its fair game.

    • @riba2233
      @riba2233 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How can it discourage innovation when it improved upon the original design? It is not a copy lol, it is a high quality product that offers added benefits over the "original" one.

    • @lawrencedeleurere4427
      @lawrencedeleurere4427 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dereklong801 If it is patented, it's also fair game from Chinese manufacturers. China requires that all patent claims be resolved in their courts. They fine any entity operating in China up to 100 thousand dollars a day for bringing patent claims against Chinese companies in foreign courts. Chinese courts are not known for being friendly to foreign companies. So let's say Jessem wants to sue Hongdui for patent infringement. They have to sue them in a Chinese court or risk millions in fines from the Chinese. I suppose that it's possible that Chinese courts could honor patent infringement cases from Jessem, but you run into issues that the Chinese system requires the patents be registered with the Chinese patent organizations. Western industries claim that often, local manufacturers will beat them to the punch and register copycat patents in China of Western patents. It's really not fair game in any sense of the term.

    • @lawrencedeleurere4427
      @lawrencedeleurere4427 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@riba2233 It discourages innovation because it lowers the amount of reward Western companies see from their original innovation. If a company spends say 1 million dollars on developing a product, they need to see at least 1 million dollars in profit from that product to make the research worthwhile. Pretend for a moment a world without Chinese copycats, a company might estimate that it can sell 100 thousand units at 15 dollar profit and make 1.5 million, for a profit of 500 thousand. Now we have a world with Chinese copycats that cuts the number of units the original company can sell in half so down to 50 thousand units as people instead want to buy the cheap Chinese knockoff. This leads to a profit of -250 thousand dollars, so the original company will say, it's not worth it to invest in researching a new tool because we'll take a loss on it. That's how it discourages innovation.

    • @riba2233
      @riba2233 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lawrencedeleurere4427 rofl, you live in a fantasy land. So if you see a design, and have the idea to improve it (or you know, actually innovate?) and sell the improved version, you should never be able to do that? How is that good for the innovation on the market please explain. Also if they made a 1:1 copy with no improvements I wouldn't say anything, but cmon.

  • @the_boatswain
    @the_boatswain 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thirty minutes of competition to die on the hill of, "Meh, doesn't matter, they all work." 🤣

  • @johnhorner5711
    @johnhorner5711 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Hmmm, it looks like the "Katz-Moses" is made by Hongdui in China and is readily available on Banggood (home of many Chinese tools). Hongdui is well known for making copies or near copies of many other people's designs. Hence the source of the controversy IMO.

    • @mccarthydesign1429
      @mccarthydesign1429 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      And many of their copies are of Veritas. Hongdui even uses the same product photos as Veritas for their plane stops.

    • @chipsterb4946
      @chipsterb4946 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mccarthydesign1429ouch! That’s is beyond disreputable. 🤬

    • @HopeStreetWoodworks
      @HopeStreetWoodworks 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chipsterb4946 They literally photoshopped their plane stop onto Veritas's product photo. It's bad.

    • @danranger3392
      @danranger3392 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They also copy Jessem products@@mccarthydesign1429

    • @riba2233
      @riba2233 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hongdui actually innovative and improve on old designs so I don't see the issue.

  • @skippylippy547
    @skippylippy547 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great review, wonderfully crafted video! Thank you. 👍
    but . . . you left out The Mighty BenchDog! 🤣
    I mean, after all . . . Rob Cosman reviewed the Benchdog and gave his approval!
    So I bought the BenchDog for 68.00 ON SALE and lovin' life. Makin' things. 💪

  • @mwrcrft
    @mwrcrft 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have had the Veritas model for 10 or so years and it has been a reliable tool with no surprises.

  • @bobmartin6055
    @bobmartin6055 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another great video!
    Love your insights!
    Cheers

  • @Timber2Toothpicks
    @Timber2Toothpicks 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You did a KILLER job on the plane. I have the KM and the Veritas…. I use them both & both are set up differently. Good Job! The Veritas with all the extras is a very expensive investment. However, when you learn how quickly you can use all the irons… worth every penny. Thats why I bought both of them. The KM is SWEET. The Veritas is just sooo COOL and we all know that counts. Well Done! You use the knob or nut properly. My dad had that plane. I have it and never use it…. Dont STUB your open toe!!!

  • @michaelthompson5875
    @michaelthompson5875 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    My two cents...not that anyone wants them. I often find the "design rip-off" argument less elitist and more...hypocritical? Lacking in self-awareness? Often, those who make that argument will recommend that if you can't afford Veritas/LN planes, buy a "pre-war Stanley." But they will also suggest Sargent, Millers Falls, or Record. Um...those 3 companies just ripped off the Stanley designs. Sure, they made minor adjustments and upgrades, but they were pretty minor. I also think some of those furniture makers are so focused on "original design" that they forget tools, by definition, HAVE to be functional. If a tool's design makes it not function well, it's not useful. So, of course, there will be frequent "borrowing" of design. Having said that, i think they are just using that to cover their preference for North American made products. And Im certainly sympathetic to that. What I find odd is that the JKM tool, price wise, is basically right in the middle ofbthe Veritas and LN. If there isn't a significant cost savings by buying Asian, why bother? Buy North American and at least know you're supprting your "neighbor." So to speak. I think the same of the Wood River line.
    Ok now I'm starting to ramble. I hope that makes sense but thank you for the review Erik! I own the Veritas and LOVE it. I have never seriously considered owning any other router plane because I have no reason to.

    • @no_goo
      @no_goo 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      100% agree

    • @ENCurtis
      @ENCurtis  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for a fair and well considered response.

  • @jeffsimpson9232
    @jeffsimpson9232 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I use a Veritas and a very old Stanley that doesn't have a depth adjuster. I set and *mark* my baselines with the Veritas. I hog out the waste with the Stanley, which is quickly adjusted with hammer taps, and do the final clean-up with the Veritas. I love this system.

  • @chroniclesofbowlandjoel
    @chroniclesofbowlandjoel 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great Video Erik! I really enjoy the way you teach throughout

  • @chriskovaly6634
    @chriskovaly6634 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I’ll 100% buy lie-Nielsen and support and American company with tools made in America. When we buy something we are voting with our dollars and I choose to vote for companies that truly support the community and make their products in the states.

    • @grantwilliams630
      @grantwilliams630 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I just buy the tool that I like the best. I have a LN 102 that I really love and get a ton of use out of, but I also have a Veritas router plane that I think is way more comfortable to use than the LN and of equal quality.
      Buying a tool from any of the modern companies that make decent tools is a win IMO. LN has a great factory in the US with great quality control etc. but they also aren't really innovating in a massive way. They make a better version of the Stanley tools, but Lee Valley (through Veritas) is trying much more unique designs. I don't always like the unique designs they come up with, but I think it's really good for the space as a whole (plus PM-V11 is really nice).

    • @the_sharp_carpenter
      @the_sharp_carpenter 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Veritas are cast, machined and assembled in Canada, so it's still a north american tool. Most of the wood you use comes from Canada so it's all good 😜

  • @Varvitski
    @Varvitski 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hardly controversial I would have thought, but simply an excellent summary comparing the pros and cons of these editions of this interesting tool. Glad to have clicked the bait. Thanks for the video.

  • @StripeyType
    @StripeyType 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It is - as a metalworker who came to the hobby from woodworking first - weird to me to hear woodworkers talk about the differences that a few thou will make. Generally solid wood will move way more than that seasonally. That having been said, it's also *refreshing*; yes, wood will move, and yes, glue will absolutely take up even a ten-thou gap without much trouble. But chasing precision can feel GOOD. It's a false economy when you're trying to make a piece to sell. But if you're just... working to a high standard because that kind of practice is how you improve? That's something I can genuinely appreciate.
    All of that having been said, I've often really felt that any kind of plane iron - and this includes hag-tooth and router planes - should be fashioned from a single, simple, flat piece of bar stock. The owner of the plane should be able to replace the iron with a shop-made one that was laid out on flat bar stock tool steel which was prepared with no more than a file. I'll make allowances for the necessary hole in the irons of most bench planes, but generally the adjustment features shouldn't be a part of the iron in my view, they should be integrated into the cap-iron or chipbreaker.
    Wooden planes meet this definition far more readily than transitional-and-later planes; I'm not sure *why* I feel this way, mind you, and it's not something I feel strongly-enough about to claim is some kind of hard-and-fast rule to which I hold even *my own* tools, let alone anybody else's.
    I dunno. Every so often I draw up a set of planes in CAD with this design requirement. The Router is always the trickiest. Maybe someday I'll actually make one of these silly things. It's a lot of design work which is intended to make the "consumable" of the iron itself something trivially replaced by the woodworker, and which is totally unnecessary in this day and age. Maybe it might've been something useful in the nineteenth century, to be able to just go to the village blacksmith and say "hey I need an iron; it's not complicated."

  • @Demon_Mx2277
    @Demon_Mx2277 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Issues with buying tools woodworkers make that I see right away is they probably won't make that plane forever and getting a new blade steel for it will be virtually impossible down the road. Where as buying the bigger named stuff they have been around for ages and will most likely in the future so parts will be readily accessible

  • @mikeking7470
    @mikeking7470 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What was in that coffee cup, you're having a conversation with a cartoon sun! BTW the Stanley had BOTH an open throat and a throat closer and the one you were waving around had slots in the base to keep the fences straight. Those are both things you said it didn't have.

  • @SWA-Projects
    @SWA-Projects 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hahaha! That’s the best sponsor ending ever! 18:38 😂
    Seriously everyone don’t skip this presentation, it’s fun.
    Thanks for making me laugh!
    Now I’m gonna resume the video 👍

  • @dasdenny5495
    @dasdenny5495 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    For me the Veritas is not that great. I bought it 3 year ago. First of all, I never thought, that the size would be my main problem. I like to clean tenons with it and because it is smaller than my stanley and the handles are agled, it is very difficult to maintain a solid stand on the board that's beside the tenon. The second problem and maybe it was specific on my plane was, that the locking mechanism never got to the point, where the blade did not move when I was working. Every time the blade had to took off more then a hair thin shaving it wanderd downwards. THe plane was bought new, but I fast came to the decission to sell it and try a used stanley instead an it fits my need better and holds the blade. I thin the Lie Nielson blade will hold excelent in the cast whole, but never tried one. Maybe it's personal preferense but for me, a good used standley was the better investment for me. But if the Veritas serves you well, it's the right one for you. I think at the end I am not into tool wars anyway. get the tool that fits your need, test some different and if the things you want to create are possible to creat with the tools, it's the right tool for you. Like your content, great work. The Katz-Moses Version is all over the chinese sites and in the same style as customer brand in europa at Dictum too, so it's a very close call, that the all came out the same factory in China with different names.

  • @HeliRy
    @HeliRy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As a Canuck, I’ll always lean towards Veritas. Canadian owned, operated and built 👌

  • @tacticalskiffs8134
    @tacticalskiffs8134 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great exposition. Pointless topic. Mainly rests on the idea that screw adjustable depth measurements are needed or efficient. Bottom line is that if you wanted to return to a specific depth, as with most things the smart move would be to have more than one router plane. Grab some flea market ones, or some home made ones and set them to the sizes you need and grab them and go.
    I have a Veritas router and it is great, but the fact it has screw adjustable depth is more a bug than a feature. Say one is working off a depth mark from a marking gauge. I would just throw the tooth in that, and squeeze the slop out, and tighten. Done. Nobody works in tens. I have planes that cut in 3 tens increments, but I am not working those increments. It isn't as if a client has a drawer damaged in shipping and I can just send him a new front and it will fit right in. Everything is in relation to another dimension or part. The ability to dial in a measurement is basically irrelevant.
    Another reality is that while great work is done today in modern societies, and was done back when metal tools came in, probably the best work ever done was done, and is done with tools that had wooden bodies and were tapped to a measurement. Back in the times of royals or in places like China and Japan today. Basically a bunch of newbies arguing over things they don't understand. Just as with the bride business, you sell stuff to people who are outfitting for the first time. LV doesn't make money selling to woodworking sages, they need people in their stores who haven't a tool or a clue, and those people need a lot of reassurance.

  • @thecrazychemist
    @thecrazychemist 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The under-mounted fence on the Stanley 71 is actually captive in the two grooves which keeps it perpendicular to the blade

  • @BakerVS
    @BakerVS 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like the cut at 4:35 :). I saw the screw get turned around after the cut.

  • @martinrwolfe
    @martinrwolfe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A very good review. I have the Stanley 71. First a couple of points on the 71 it does gave the guide groves so that the fence is always square. Secondly one of the cutters the witches for mine the witches tooth does have an iron that is removable from the stem. With regards to the KM router plane for me once I was made aware of the depth stop and and its improved functionality over the Veritas one the controvesy vanished. The only gripe I now have with the KM is the Chineese manufacture however as far as I know no UK plane manufacturer makes a metal bodied router plane that is a miner gripe. One add on / after market mod I would like to see for the stanly is replacing that foot with an actual verticaly adjustable mouth which I think would be a far better use of that mount point as it is already there..

  • @victoryak86
    @victoryak86 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’d buy that JKM. Looks beautiful.

  • @watermain48
    @watermain48 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great comparison Erik. I have an old, in the box Miller Falls router plane in good condition, but it's time to upgrade. I like the Katz-Moses, but the threads being a little coarse and left-handed is a stopper for me, plus I like supporting domestic products so I'm going to get the Veritas or Lie-Neilson version. Thanks for the video.

  • @nickyt3269
    @nickyt3269 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    uhhhhhh, anyone else hallucinate an animated sun in this video??? def worth the sub.

  • @markgibala2268
    @markgibala2268 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for reviewing and providing a great overview. I been looking at buying a new router plan and thought in was going to buy the LN as I have 6 of their planes and love the quality. JKM might be the winner due to adjustability.

  • @RobKing25
    @RobKing25 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Anyone else click on the thumbnail because it looked like Robert De Niro doing a woodworking video in the 80's? The man's even got the stare and the eyebrows down pat.

  • @Kosh42EFG
    @Kosh42EFG 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have the JKM mallet. It's awesome. The router plane is on my buy list...

  • @mcguiganmike
    @mcguiganmike 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    great job. Just an FYI, the KM plane is on sale right now. I think $189 range. I am still not ready to buy one, but I am new to woodworking and learning a lot!

  • @vanislescotty
    @vanislescotty 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Timely, was considering buying a router plane soon. Thank you!

  • @theenderface7379
    @theenderface7379 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    As a full time furniture maker, I'll just stick to my fully American made Lie-Nielsen. The Veritas is very nice as well (easier to sharpen), I've used them as well and I own a lot from both companies. However, there is an elitism about having American made tools in my shop which produces American made furniture and my clients are aware of that fact, which is enticing to them.

  • @jsmxwll
    @jsmxwll 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    i have the JKM, a Stanley and the one i built out of the Paul Sellers kit, and then one made based on the Paul Sellers kit with a much finer depth adjustment screw. i use the two Paul Sellers style planes pretty most of the time. they are functional, easy to use, and easy to modify to fit my working style. i also have a hags tooth with a rounded blade that i use for really moving material. i'm just a hobbiest having a ball making whatever has my attention at the moment. i am a lot harder on my tools than most people probably are, which is why i like self made tools. i can remake them when i break them. if i break the JKM router plane, i might cry. HONGDUI makes pretty good tools, and is willing to work with someone like JKM, whereas getting a Veritas or Lie-Nielsen to co-brand a tool and do development work is a lot less likely. both companies really seem to focus on their core competency and probably don't have the latitude to experiment too much given how high their costs are.

    • @davidberrien9711
      @davidberrien9711 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I had been making do with the Paul Sellers "Poor Man's Router Plane" made out of random scraps of construction lumber. Did great work, but repeatable cuts are fiddly... Planning the work makes things go smoother.
      I finally sprung for the Taylor Toolworks mini router plane and it is a gem. But depth adjustment is not screw-thread assisted, and there is no depth stop. But it works well, and is well-made.
      Their full-size router plane is very interesting, appears to have all the essential features, and is 1/2 the price of the big boys in the video.

  • @bryanmartin8336
    @bryanmartin8336 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I grabbed a Lie Nielsen because I needed one and couldn't find any in stores around me. Took me less than a week to buy a Jack from them after that. Not sure what this controversy is that you're talking about, but I couldn't be happier with what I already have.

  • @BlankBrain
    @BlankBrain 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I made my router plane from a piece of oak firewood. The blades are made from large hex keys and held in place with a steel dowel pin and thumb screw. The depth adjustment is a ring with thumb screw. The wood is an elbow, so he grain follows the front. Part of the top is live edge. The thing is, it actually works quite well. I can affix a plastic laminate shoe protector with carpet tape later if I want.

  • @roy.mclean
    @roy.mclean 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have an LN. I was curious to see how you compare tools you can make from a block of wood and an Allen wrench ground to a point. I don't see measuring scales as a feature as if I really need precision to match a cut, then I just adjust the tool using the original cut, set the depth stop and work my way down to it. I'm ok with TH-camrs making money selling tools. I like JKMs content, but his tool seems more fancy than anyone needs, but the price is good. I received my LN as a gift, but I have made my own in the manner I mentioned above. but I'd use any of the ones mentioned. Good work.

  • @grantwilliams630
    @grantwilliams630 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I bought my Veritas router plane because i thought the angled handles were more comfortable (the KM one didn't exist at the time). I've been super impressed with it, but I doubt you could go wrong with any of them.

  • @KOutOfMyYard
    @KOutOfMyYard 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “I don’t want to yuck your yum”.. after that I don’t know if I heard much bc I was giggling like a moron … as always you are great!! Thanks so much!!

  • @cristianvel619
    @cristianvel619 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just ordered the Veritas after seeing this video. I’m new to mortise and tenon joinery and need it for my first project. I feel the LN and Veritas have that heirloom quality and the JKM maybe doesn’t have or hasn’t earned. That’s basically my rationale, that and the removable blade for sharpening.

  • @andrewirvine6444
    @andrewirvine6444 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Depth Adjustment
    All you need is a loose leaf binder of shins with a central cutout to go under the casting and both sides of the blade. Pick the right shim e.g. 1/10,000 of an inch, loosen the collet and hold the casting and blade pressing lightly downward. Then retighten the collet, licking the blade 1/10000” lower. Remove the shim and the blade will accurately plane out /10000” for you.
    Works with el cheapo Stanley and the fancy costly variants equally well. Obviously this only needs to be used for finalising the dado as the adjustment will be coarser down to the last 1/1000” or so.

  • @theenderface7379
    @theenderface7379 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    On the "controversy", it doesn't bother me in any way that JKM is producing tools, however, outsourcing the casting automatically excludes it as a tool that I'd purchase. Especially given the pricing is higher than the Veritas and only $20 less than the fully American made Lie-Nielsen. Sorry but no and that's not an elitist view, it's getting what you pay for and when you can spend $20 more and get the Lie-Nielsen or spend less and get the Veritas...

  • @janmartinsen2820
    @janmartinsen2820 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I have the Veritas. But if i didnt, i would make the Paul Sellers Router Plane, specially with the prices in Norway now, close to 400 dollars for that tool at the moment. What i would like to get now, is actually a good plough plane.

  • @marcbarash6045
    @marcbarash6045 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks Erik

    • @ENCurtis
      @ENCurtis  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you sir!

  • @BillMSmith
    @BillMSmith 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Contentedly clueless over this controversy. I do own a Veritas, works fine, a router plane is essential to me. A few months ago a friend gave me a cheap router plane his wife had bought off Amazon, I think for less than 40 bucks. A little while back I had the Veritas set for what would be a whole bunch of cuts to a specific depth. I set the cheapo up, required surprisingly little sharpening, the sole was flat enough for most uses so I put it to work. Terrible ergonomics, but the thing cut just fine. I never knew I needed a second router plane, but for the times I do, this will work.
    BTW, someone once said " Show me an unbiased human being, I'll show you a corpse." That might have been me. Thanks for keeping track of your own. Now go get back to the lumber rack and have some fun.

  • @MatchaMakesThings
    @MatchaMakesThings หลายเดือนก่อน

    I found an blade for cheap wedged some wood together, and it gets me through.

  • @davidjohnston4240
    @davidjohnston4240 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like the hex bolts in the handles. Function over form makes the functional form become the norm.

  • @jimweisgram9185
    @jimweisgram9185 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have the Veritas router plane.
    I like the innovation with the Veritas that the blade is separate from the blade stem. Sharpening is easier, from my point of view.
    The KM tool has a similar construction for the blade as the Veritas.
    I agree that the Veritas depth stop is not as precise as it should be.
    FYI, we now have a simpler router plane from Paul Sellers. And a very similar one produced by the newish Australian toolmaker whose name escapes me.
    Their blade is straight and held at an angle to the piece of wood.

  • @Ukjon72
    @Ukjon72 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video. Another thought is what about the Rockler and Woodcraft versions? Haha

    • @ENCurtis
      @ENCurtis  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Totally fair questions. Will have to take another dive into WoodRiver in 2024...

  • @rjg6139
    @rjg6139 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I remember you having a negative opinion of WoodRiver planes-why is that? Don't they have similar criticisms levelled against them for being lifted from competitors castings (Lie-Nielsen) and being manufactured in China? I'm wondering if you believe they're functionally deficient or the initial brazen copy of LN planes turned you off.

  • @philaandrew100
    @philaandrew100 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I trained on the '71 some 40 years ago so yeah, it is my go to router plane.... or should I say router planes as there are 6 or 7 lurking in my workshop, each of them setup to do different tasks. Lucky I got them waaaay before the Maestro Paul Sellars made them a highly sought after tool.... I have the Veritas version as well.
    However, they are all good and you are spot on with your conclusions.

    • @ENCurtis
      @ENCurtis  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I appreciate your insight given your experience. Nothing wrong with the ol' 71. Just a matter of personal preference.

    • @philaandrew100
      @philaandrew100 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly. Use the tool that you are most comfortable with. I am sure that if I only had the choice of of a Veritas or Lie Nielson I would be just as happy. They are all really good tools.

  • @marchuvfulz
    @marchuvfulz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice. Great little product comparison.