I had the honor of being the first person to see Apollo 17 re-enter the atmosphere. 90 Miles off North Vietnam it looked like someone fired a missile at us. I was bridge watch on USS Saratoga. The xo came out and watched this red hot thing zoom across the sky. It took 4 hours and a call to Fleet to figure out what that was.The CO called me inside at the end of my watch. He is the one that told me that .
Space travel doesn't exist. They said they travelled 800,000 km in the 60's. Through extreme temperatures, radiation, space debris, etc Look at how techology like virtual reality evolved from pong around 60's. We went 800,000 km to moon supposedly 5 times 55 years ago We cant do it anymore? We cant even get commercial flights 100km into orbit? We have 10,000 satellites and no videos of them in orbit? 0 for 10,000? We can build an ISS that has no construction videos exactly proving the theoretical into the actual? 0 minutes of actual construction out of over millions of minutes of construction Showing us how modules were tracked in those conditions and how astronauts linked to modules and built sealant valves in vaccum like conditions etc There are third party pictures of iss but no videos showing the iss, planet, stars? 0 hours out of thousands of hours?
9:56 "I was strolling on the Moon one day, in the very very month of May/December". It was like Cernan and Schmidt were a couple of good friends having fun on the town. They did extraordinary things in space, but deep down they were folks like us.
@@gumpyflyale2542 No conspiracy of that magnitude could possibly hold up for over 50 years. Bill Clinton couldn't get blowjobs from an intern without the whole world knowing about it one year later, but the US would've been able to fake SIX multi-billion dollars moon missions involving hundreds of thousands people, tricking not only their own polation but also every single other nation in the world ? Come on...
@Adi Adiani which version are you talking about? There is a alot of Charlie Chaplin version, remastered where the quality were alot better, you can also find a better footage about the moon landing on TH-cam
I've lived on the space coast all my life and I'm almost 50. Those night launches are truly spectacular. I've seen so many launches, but the night ones are the most memorable.
The rocket flies above the clouds, then levels out when you can no longer see it, then lands... How do you people believe this "footage." 2:55 has to be my favourite. At 8 minutes leave the video at double speed. There was no moon landing. I can't believe the intellect of this generation.
Julian S I dont get it. Why do you think its impossible to go to the Moon? Second, rockets *never* fly on cloudy day. Third, in order to get into orbit, you must turn and burn towards the horizon if you want to pull the orbit out. If you are such and expert in debunking nasa, you need to be introduced with basics of orbital mechanics in order to judge what is legit and what not. Since you dont research anything, i consider you as a troll.
james dean You would have to deliberately avoid seeking an answer to your question to have never heard it explained. The reason is a matter of exposure. To capture star light, the film/sensor must be exposed to the scene for 15-20 seconds. This is known as a shutter speed and is a MINIMUM for capturing star light. However, for the lunar photographs (and photos of the Earth from the ISS), the subjects are large and brightly lit by the sun, so to properly expose those subjects, a much shorter shutter speed is necessary. 15 full seconds is FAR too long an exposure. For the Apollo Lunar photographs, exposures between 1/60th and 1/250th of a second were used. Since at least 15 full seconds of exposure is required to capture star light on film, you should be able to imagine that an exposure of 1/60th of a second is far too short an exposure to capture star light. So, the very fact that the lunar surface is properly exposed tells anyone familiar with photography - and specifically exposure - that the settings prohibit star light from.showing up. They COULD take photos of stars from the ISS on the dark side of Earth (and they do - just not many). The problem is again - they need 15-20 seconds of exposure and the ISS is in orbit - so the stars move a lot relative to the orientation of the camera in that time. It's difficult, so a lot of the photos of stars you get from the ISS are star trails - for this very reason. There is no reason to attempt to take quality pictures of the stars from the ISS when things like Hubble exist. Hubble can take far better pictures because it is designed to take pictures. Ts designed to take its own orbit around Earth into account to track and maintain focus on a partuclar area of the sky. That's literally Hubble's job. When you have that, taking photographs from the ISS is more for artistic purposes than scientific.
Go outside at night with your iPhone. Take a picture of a streetlight with the stars in the background. Now count the visible stars in your picture. There won't be any. The camera exposes for the streetlight (the rocket) and in doing so, the faint stars are too dim to appear. This is basic photography.
The footage about landing and leaving from the moon view has been filmed by an important alien director, the same who directed the alien movie "Human vs Predator"
The icing on the cake- Like been there, done that? Imagine if the world acted that way after the Wright Brothers got their plane off the ground. Gee guys - been there done that no need to ever get a plane off the ground again- “icing on the cake”!
It was nice to relive a moment that I shared with my family years ago. My dad saw to it that we were interested in the things that went on around us. At that age...I would have missed it had it not been for him and my mom!❤
Schmitt sounds so happy and confident on the descent, calling Cernan "Gene-o" etc. The guy was obviously having a blast the whole time, trusting in their training and really enjoying himself during the epic event of his life. Awesome.
Very impressive movie. It is a pity that no other expeditions for the Moon have took place since then :( But we must remain optimistic for the Mars landing.
The only real comment on this bs Hollywood movie. My question is 1, where did the rover come from. 2, the moon landing capsule is totally different from the earth landing capsule?? 3, where is all the fuel stored. 3, why hasn't anyone in earth been back to the moon????
@Terrence Owen government Google been lying to gullible people for decades. At some point QandA's need to be answered to support stories being told. Many countries were racing to get to the moon, and US wanted/needed to be first by all means necessary.
@@BCO216oh wow! I had always believed this up to now, but your brilliant and well-informed analysis has completely changed my mind. You have demolished all the so-called experts and I can only assume you must be the most intelligent person ever to walk the earth
@@BCO216 I'd like to think there's no such thing as a stupid question, but all of yours seem to tow that line. 1. The rover was slung and folded against the side of the descent stage. It's very small in comparison to the lander. 2. The Lunar Module was designed for exactly that; to land astronauts on the Moon. It lacks sufficient thermal shielding to enter Earth's atmosphere; the Command Module was what the Apollo astronauts used to re-enter the atmosphere, attached to the Service Module which separates just before re-entry. 3. Fuel is stored in several tanks inside the descent and ascent stages. They're hidden from view. 4. NASA's funding peaked in 1966 but fell year after year following, especially after Apollo 11. It was decided that Skylab and the Space Shuttle would be better value for money, which is why the final missions were postponed and then cancelled. Apollo's 18 & 19 were cancelled in 1970 due to the aforementioned budget cuts, and the Saturn V rocket that was to take Apollo 20 to the Moon was reassigned as the launcher for Skylab. Going to the Moon was expensive, and required a lot of political will, as well as considerably risk to men and machine. Why return to the Moon when probes and landers could get there a lot cheaper?
such a positive attitude the whole time, joking around etc. Cant help but think i would be in a constant state of tense paranoia of something going wrong. Balls of steel.
If You look thorougly, the camera is often "left behind" when the astronauts move. Sometimes the camera operator knew in advance in which direction they would move and could start the panning in time. When he followed the LM's lift off, he knew exactly when the count down should reach "zero" and started the tilt up about a second in advance.
@@YDDES I know all this crap is fake. I served in Desert Storm, Iraqi Freedom and years as a DOD contractor in Afghanistan. Trust me, I know what kind of fiction our government comes up with. Time is catching up with the lies but all involved will be dead.
Apollo 17 was the eleventh manned space mission in the NASA Apollo programme. It was the first night launch of a U.S. human spaceflight and the sixth and final lunar landing mission. The mission was launched at 12:33 a.m. EST on 7 December 1972, and concluded on December 19. One of the last two men to set foot on the Moon was also the first scientist-astronaut, geologist Harrison ("Jack") Schmitt. While Evans circled in America, Schmitt and Cernan collected a record 109 lb (49 kg) of rocks during three Moonwalks. The crew roamed for 34 km (21 mi) through the Taurus-Littrow valley in their rover, discovered orange-colored soil, and left the most comprehensive set of instruments in the ALSEP on the lunar surface. Their mission was the last in the Apollo lunar landing missions. The last 4 Apollo craft were used for the three Skylab missions and the ASTP, mission in 1975.
@@gustav_ostervall_92 Yea must have been pretty tough for the USSR to lie about it for their enemies protection too. And China... and India... and every other country too...
Moonlanding is one of those things i can't decide in my head do i believe it or not, there's so many things that are off about it like the black space without stars and that interview where they are almost scared for their life. In this video by the end i can see one time it looks like the guy is hanging out there with his helmet open couse his face is showing. I don't think it would be impossible to go there so did they fake the footage only? Those "simulation" s on the TV station are pretty close to the thing seen in the supposed real footage. This thing remains mystery to me at this point.
@@gustav_ostervall_92so this is a video of Apollo 17, and you’re referring to a single picture from after Apollo 11 which really isn’t the smoking gun you think it is. oh the guys who just went through a very exhausting mission aren’t sitting like cheerleaders with fake smiles plastered on their faces 24/7? must be fake
@@freddybob807 I believe what science and education tell me to believe. You believe what an uneducated failed cab driver (Bart Sibrel) tells you to believe.
@@freddybob807 You can hear them at NASA talking what they'll do next as they turn that camera lens down, to a side, etc. In the Apollo 14 video you can hear the camera handler (by RC) say he will turn the camera off. Most of you unbelievers seem to think that Remote Control was unknown at the time.
Try watching some of the videos taken from the lunar rover - it drives for a long towards the distant mountains whih you claim to be backdrops, and they come no nearer or change in perspective, proving they're many miles away. In addition, many stereo-pair images were taken, which show that the landscape is exactly what is seems: vast. If there was a backdrop 100 feet away, stereo pairs would show it up immediately.
Ghost White. Not a good enough argument that it was fake. It happened a long time ago and at the time this was going to be a continuous project. Lack of enthusiasm by the public, Funding and more important and pressing issues on planet earth put an end to space exploration for the time being.. Blimey in those 50 years the importance of keeping the video safe and in its entirety perhaps as the years went by didn't seem as important. The BBC insanley taped over their coverge of the 69 moon landing because video was expensive and had to be reused. People do stupid things, but you don't need to make a conspiracy out of it.
There's a mirror on the surface of the Moon (Lunar Laser Ranging experiment) that we can point a laser at and measure it's distance from us. If we didn't go there, how the hell did that get there?
Robotic landing craft. However, there's a better piece of evidence that doesn't require any technical knowledge: The Russians didn't call bullshit. I mean, if the moon landing was faked, they probably would have known. The USSR had an unmanned spacecraft in lunar orbit at the time and probably had KGB spies infiltrating the US government and its allies (at least in British intelligence. See Oxford Five).
There's a lot of people on these pages that wanna attach a wire to my neck and then attach it to a scaffold! But you're right - there's plenty of nasa footage showing them using wire suspended activity. Strange how not too many can make the correlation between nasa showing them what they did and the later footage that pretends to be on the moon.
You have obviously never been to a launch. Thats a lot of power. Why waste a perfectly good rocket just to make you pendejos think it was real? As for the moon shots, well there were no wires. At 1/6th the gravity of the earth even carrying 300 pounds on a 200 pound man amounts to about 83 pounds total. On earth it would be 500 pounds. But then again I am a little prejudiced because I have had the pleasure of meeting Harrison Hagan "Jack" Schmitt, the American geologist, retired NASA astronaut, university professor and former U.S. senator from New Mexico when he was Senator here. My brother was the the lucky one though as he actually worked for the man for a few years after his astronaut days. You might want to pick up one of his books to read when you are not trolling Utube looking for trouble.
Oh Boy! You must be a s'thick as a brick? I mean, what's wrong with your brain? Why would going to the moon suddenly make you 'slow down'? Any idiot knows that agility in movement is all about 'power-to-weight' - and yet your own figures show that even suited up, and astronaut is only going to weight around 1/3 as much as he would on earth. So wouldn't that make him more agile? But then, I guess, if you're an idiot, why would you ever reach that conclusion? You're (obviously) also so stupid, yo haven't seen the reduced-gravity simulations that nasa did, way before they ever launched anyone. That footage shows quite clearly that what you're saying is utter bullshit! All that makes me wonder - are you from the moon? A brain made for the moon would slow down somewhat when re-located to earth. Sounds like you?
15:46 what a dream... one much more tangible back then, being that we hadn’t even sent *anything* to space a decade before going to the moon. Almost half a century later and we haven’t even gone back.
We’ve had great advances, don’t get me wrong, but imagine what would be if America still had that fervor for space, one fueled by curiosity and a spirit of exploration, rather than a Cold War
@@Momo-bb2fn Yeah. But, very few people want to fork over their money for so few people to be able to do those explorations. For example, it took a dictatorship to fund Magellan's voyage around the world, because if left up to the general populous, they wouldn't have wanted to pay for it. Even Magellan's own country's king (Portugal) didn't want to pay for it, and that's why Magellan ended up being paid by Spain's king instead. And, Magellan's voyage costed nowhere near Apollo, not by a long shot, not even close. And, that was for hundreds of people to go, and lasted three years. Apollo costed orders of magnitude more, and only resulted in 12 men walking on the moon for a few hours each. Yeah, you're right, the cold war produced that, while we are left only imagining what would happen if the public funded things like that purely for the sake of curiosity. We, as a species, don't tend to do that very much. Most of the time, we fund voyages that we ourselves can go on. We very rarely dump that level of money, funding from hundreds of millions of people, into voyages that only a dozen people get to make. You're right, it is a bit of a shame. But, that's the reality about humanity.
@@rockethead7 exactly, only I’d change ur second sentence to “very few want to fork over their money for _exploration_ “ In my mind, people going on explorations is hardly even part of the question. I’m more referring to the technology, which in itself is an exploration, one people don’t appreciate. As u said, such is humanity
With all our advanced technology and NASA they would have gone back had they went at all. This is so fake. I do not believe they walked on the moon. This is Hollywood.
Watch the video footage of this take-off from the camera inside the LM. Watch it side-by-side with this take-off. It does not match at all. When the LM performs ‘pitch over’, absolutely no pitch over can be seen in the video from within the LM. “Surely a mistake like this would be front page news!” Nope, the Moon landings are perhaps the biggest real life example of the ‘Emperor has no no clothes’.
Apollo 17 was the last mission to the Moon ; at the time, no one would have thought that most of the staff at NASA, would have passed on from old age ; waiting for another Moon mission. The question is whether we see it return in our life time ?
IMO Moon travel will certainly happen in 5 years at most...can you say China..Russia ..and India...or possibly a company located in private industry but ...I seriously doubt if the USA nation as a whole..will return to the Moon during the lifetime of anyone now living who is past the age of 20
pipercub123456 Within five years to the next Moon landing ? I wish you were right, although it maybe attempted, the chance of success is extremely unlikely. Rocket science on the scale of the Saturn 5 is so often taken for granted today ! F1 is still the most powerful built, the most reliable rocket and it made the Apollo program a success. Records show: everything else has been either too small or fails during test ; all the rest is just theory ! Once we witness some large rocket launch into the heavens ; "only then" a landing will be within 5 years at most....
On apollo 17 they were 16 silver oxide-zinc cells. The power head operated around 430 watts. The handle contained the battery pack which could be removed from the power head but also the handle pack and power head could be removed together to allow for additional drill stems to be attached to allow for the desired depth to be achieved. The power head would then be re-attached and drilling would continue.
Le plus grand mensonge de l'humanité surtout. Le drapeau qui flotte au vent . Plus c'est gros mieux ça passe. La reconnaissance faciale vient de mettre à jour le montage bois ,aluminium de cette mascarade. C'est le serpent qui se mort la queue .
but why isn't there footage of them assembling it? they land, then......its there. and did they have time to pack it up? I have seen rover (actual one, not replicated) exhibited on display before.......
Mynamenotimportant the lrv, the lunar roving vehicle, was actually folded into a small space, they opened a hatch on the lander and took it out by hand, its actual weight on the moon was about 35 kilograms, so it was no Problem at all
Mynamenotimportant Hi, here's some footage of the rover being deployed on the moon; /watch?v=-ShauSWcTC4 And here's the procedure being tested on earth; /watch?v=ObEjEEfnBj8 I hope that helps.
Actually, Apollo 11 was close to an abort of the landing. They were nearly out of descent fuel when they landed. The autopilot was steering them into a boulder field and Armstrong had to take manual control, and steer the LM to a viable landing site. When they were preparing to ascend, they discovered that a switch, vital to arming the ascent engine had been broken, and Armstrong had to poke a pen into the hole where the switch had been. Otherwise they would have been stuck on the moon.
Actually, they doctored the recording of the "astronaut" walking in terms of changing the video to slow-motion. In normal speed, the astronauts are seen walking or running, and the prevalence of gravity becomes all to clear.
ThePariss333 more than you. It is hard to read your poorly constructed sentences. One can only imagine the thought processes behind them. They are a glimpse of a chaotic mind at work. Run back home to big brother.
ThePariss333 I agree with you, you are sorry. You want to call people humanoids and then whine and cry foul when that term is applied to you. I know where you are located by what is coming from you. I agree that you are not a humanoid, but a hemorrhoid.
@Please Complete All Fields do you just chime in yet know nothing about the subjects you chime in on? There is literally Millions of tons of vast resources, such as but not limited to, H3, water ice, the need for solar expansion, ECT. Come on guys, research!
Momohead They’re already planning a fucking mission Dumbass. The main reason they went was to beat the Soviet Union there in the space race. Truly another dumbass who’s just fucking jealous they wasted their lives unlike the people who actually landed.
This is Awesome I don't know why people would say it's fake. It's just a sham people don't believe. If they just would open their eyes they could see the bigger picture.
That has absolutely zero to do with ability. It's amazing that there are still people who think that somehow the ability to fly the moon has been 'lost' somehow. Sad²
It has to do with it being a hoax. Its a money grab for a group of hijackers. Take a few business classes and learn about 2008 crash and how these guys pull of these scams. Its a ponzi scheme Thats why no commercial flight exists , you or anyone you know has ever been in orbit, why ISS story makes little sense and has no video of the actual construction from beginning module in orbit at 27,000km an hour, and why no videos of anything in orbit exist other than fake iss shotz. We have pictures of ISS in orbit , where are the hours of third party video footage of ISS in orbit
@@scottnukend I would compare space to underwater. In the 60s went hundreds of thousands of KM to visit the moon. At this point 60 years later with trillions spent I imagine if adjust inflation and add all space programs it's odd there is hardly any videos in space showing the splendors of space like the millions of minutes of underwater footage available. Satellites also supposedly have camera capabilities for spy reasons and tens of thousands in existence and there is less than 5 minutes of satellites in orbit and all the splendors of space.
How was the craft filmed , from what ? I can understand the pictures coming from the camera inside the craft, but not the ones of the craft, unless they were filmed from the space telescope?
The Apollo space craft consisted of three parts. The LM (which is actually two stages), the command module and the service module. The LM separated from the command/service module and went down to land on the moon. Every Apollo mission had 3 astronauts. 2 went down to the surface while the third stayed in the command module and remained in lunar orbit for the duration the other two were on the surface. The footage of the LM in space was taken by that third astronaut in the command module.
No minuto 8:50 , um cabo puxa o astronauta para tras e ele cai. Esse cabo colocado nas costas do astronauta servia para simular os movimentos do mesmo na Lua.
@@serhatlindemann4327 and yet we cant even get clear signal for a cell phone here on earth.... mhmmm you gotta be guillible and naiive to believe this.
Because the cameras are set to expose the lunar surface, which is so bright that in order to show any detail, the cameras need to be set very very dark. If you were standing there and you looked up, your eyes would adjust and you would see everything
@southport97 those rocks actually offered a lot of information about the geologic composition of the moon, and the Apollo Landings program yielded a vast amount that later contributed to human space exploration like the International Space Station.
WE sent them wheat and grains, check it out. They also, being our enemy, collected the imager and gave it back to us. COLD War mortal enemies, and they gave it back. Imagine that, lol. Did the Pakastani's give us our parts from the downed helos when we "killed" osama? What about our drones that are captured when they go down? Your enemy doesnt just hand over things unless they have something to gain from it.
If this is all faked, why did they have so many problems? Hell, the first landing, Armstrong had to almost abort, and careen over the surface looking for a place free of boulders. Why fake that? For excitement? If so, why not fake more excitement in later missions? The point is, deniers have responses to all those questions, but their answers are simply arbitrary. They just try to stir up dust, and hope that in the cloud of speculation they generate, people will get confused, shrug, and say “I guess so.” No wonder they think NASA lies. They’re so used to telling people bullshit, they expect that all other people ALSO want to tell bullshit rather than the truth. A liar thinks everybody lies all the time. I don’t know what emotional need this solves for these people. I think they justifiably feel taken advantage of by modern commercialism, so they assume things have always been that way. Well, they weren’t. It’s hard to believe how different the world was before the internet and social media and smartphones.
It doesn’t help that this video was taken from a VHS tape. If you have the chance, watch the new Apollo 11 documentary in the movie theater, it will blow your mind with the amazingly detailed 70 mm footage.
@@rockethead7 18:57 Hey, I have a question for you. What type of display was the large screen used in mission control during Apollo 11 when they first viewed the EVA on the lunar surface?
Ok I just found the answer. Writing the question in the comment gave me the right words to put into a google search. Eidophor rear projection screen. ArsTechnica has a very good article titled Apollo Flight Controller 101: Every console explained.
@@Leofiora, it was a great shout to film on location, Kubrick. Would’ve been an order of magnitude harder to do all that on Earth on a sound stage... 😉
Impresionante ver el despegue nocturno del Saturno V. Que poder...Ese moustruo podia poner en OBT casi 120 Tn. POr otra parte, el ML que vemos despegar, tenia una llama casi sin brillo. Eso es por el tipo de combustible (es como los cohetes que queman alcohol o hidrogeno, que la llama es azul)
That camera wasn't outside of the window, that was filmed through the window. It's a compilation of various footage taken. Also, cameras can be mounted outside of spacecraft, as we've seen with the Space X footage.
"Apollo Program" Producer: Walt Disney deceased at that time. Co-producer: Wernher Von Braun. Director: Stanley Kubrick Art Director: John Hoesli. Writer: Arthur C Clarke. Photographer: Geoffrey Unsworth. Total cost = 169.51 billion current dollars..... Something very logical is that the Apollo missions were carried out in the 🌎because if it had been true that NASA in 1962 sent its first astronaut into space, taking just "6" years to take them to the 🌙 because in 1968 they orbited it, in 1969 they walked on it , in 1972 they were for the last time, bone today "50" years later at least we were vacationing in the 🌒 and traveling to Mars.
heyneken2156 What was Kubrick ”directing”? What the different instruments in the modules were supposed to do, or How they should move on ”Moon”? He was an expert of nothing of it.
who hold the camera and recording all of these. Once i thought camera must fit in the space craft but when i saw image of itself i was like who is all doing this..?
Yes humans have landed on the moon. Yes humans have a international space station in orbit around earth. Yes we have orbiting satellites around earth. I am sickened by the fact that i have to adress these obvious facts to trolls and idiots who are probably now gonna try there hardest to prove me wrong in the comments and start whining like babies.
You just gotta love the small pop of an explosion that apparently lifted them off the moon high enough to escape the moons gravity and meet up with a mother ship in the moons orbit ROFL
The 'small pop' that you think was the actual engine was the explosive charge that released the ascent module from the whole assembly. You can't see the plume from the engine, as the fuel burned with a clear discharge.
@@450farf if you don't understand how reality works, then that makes it clear why you think you have a beachfront property nowhere near the ocean, or why you have no clue how things work in space 🤦
@@ChrisPBacon777 lol exactly. What we’re seeing in the Apollo 17 lm footage is simply a model being pulled up over a fake backdrop. It’s very cartoonish, early sci fi movie utilized same techniques. Laughable today but hey they couldn’t predict the future
@@450farf 'lol exactly' Well, at least you agree you're clueless. I also think you need to use more 'lols'. You're not very convincing, except for how clueless you are 🤪 Maybe more lols will help.
Can somebody explain to me why the footage looks so bad in terms of quality? 2001 was filmed a few years prior to this and is still looking great. Were these cinematic cameras too big to be brought on this mission or is there another reason?
Most of the video you see was transmitted live (a couple of seconds of transmission delay). With the exception of the videos they took with the hand-held 16mm film camera, most of the video from Apollo 15/16/17 was taken with an RCA field sequential scanning TV camera, mounted to the front of the rover, and transmitted back to Earth, live, as it was happening. Not film. This meant that they didn't have a heck of a lot of "bandwidth" (using that term loosely, because it was analog, not digital) for HD signals. So, it was only a few hundred lines of resolution at best. And, making matters worse (for picture quality), they used a very lightweight camera that only had one video pickup. Most color TV cameras used three pickups (red, green, blue), back in those days, which not only meant they had 3 lenses and pickups, but also big bulky electronics to combine the 3 signals into one. But, to save on weight and size (they didn't want a big heavy camera bouncing around on the front of the rover), they went with a single pickup camera. So, how did they make colors with only one pickup? They put a small spinning color wheel (Google "RCA color wheel") behind the lens in order to make a single pickup be able to deal with multiple colors. This doesn't produce as good of a picture as a true 3-pickup camera. But, it did the job, was light, portable, didn't break from bouncing around, was remote controlled from Houston, and was able to send live video 238,000 miles.
![ตีสิบเดย์ [FULL] | เปิดใจ "อาจารย์ เบียร์ ฅนตื่นธรรม" นักสนทนาธรรมสายดุดัน!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vqaBI_mnoDk/mqdefault.jpg)
I had the honor of being the first person to see Apollo 17 re-enter the atmosphere. 90 Miles off North Vietnam it looked like someone fired a missile at us. I was bridge watch on USS Saratoga. The xo came out and watched this red hot thing zoom across the sky. It took 4 hours and a call to Fleet to figure out what that was.The CO called me inside at the end of my watch. He is the one that told me that .
Larry Monske wow that’s amazing!
Yeah, I’ve gotta say that’s pretty damn cool
Larry Monske
Great story....and THANKS for your service.
Great story, amazing!
That is so cool larry
Watching these guys improvising and doing all kinds of stuff just shows how important human presence is for exploration...
Pongant yes,billions for stupid stones!!
@@rudirosti5501 : Really moron? It's for scientific knowledge about the moon. We need to go back to the moon and learn more it.
Jack dull “we’ve” never been there. NASa is a farce and simply a way to extract money from the people to distribute it among the elites
@@rudirosti5501 I would rather pump billions of dollars into space exploration than into an uncontrolled, tumorous capitalism as we have today...
Space travel doesn't exist.
They said they travelled 800,000 km in the 60's. Through extreme temperatures, radiation, space debris, etc
Look at how techology like virtual reality evolved from pong around 60's.
We went 800,000 km to moon supposedly 5 times 55 years ago
We cant do it anymore?
We cant even get commercial flights 100km into orbit?
We have 10,000 satellites and no videos of them in orbit?
0 for 10,000?
We can build an ISS that has no construction videos exactly proving the theoretical into the actual?
0 minutes of actual construction out of over millions of minutes of construction
Showing us how modules were tracked in those conditions and how astronauts linked to modules and built sealant valves in vaccum like conditions etc
There are third party
pictures of iss but no videos showing the iss, planet, stars?
0 hours out of thousands of hours?
9:56 "I was strolling on the Moon one day, in the very very month of May/December". It was like Cernan and Schmidt were a couple of good friends having fun on the town. They did extraordinary things in space, but deep down they were folks like us.
Most Amazing and epic human adventure. Will be like a kid until my death when i look at this.. thanks for that.
Bedtime for us was 8 pm. Mom let me stay up and watch Apollo 11 live. I'll never forget that.
Its been over 47 years and counting no one has left LEO since December 1972 and no one ever will because we have been lied to for over 50 years
@@gumpyflyale2542 No conspiracy of that magnitude could possibly hold up for over 50 years. Bill Clinton couldn't get blowjobs from an intern without the whole world knowing about it one year later, but the US would've been able to fake SIX multi-billion dollars moon missions involving hundreds of thousands people, tricking not only their own polation but also every single other nation in the world ? Come on...
If possible moon should be revisited. It will keep the world busy. Also some new technologies may emerge. the world will find a purpose.
moon has been demystefied. science has won.
7:38 this has gotta be one of the most bruh moments in my life
"Bruh"
Gene Cernan , on the surface of the moon
LMAO! I was dead. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
.
@Adi Adiani its 1972, what do you expect? 4k with hq sounds recorder?
@Adi Adiani which version are you talking about? There is a alot of Charlie Chaplin version, remastered where the quality were alot better, you can also find a better footage about the moon landing on TH-cam
I've lived on the space coast all my life and I'm almost 50. Those night launches are truly spectacular. I've seen so many launches, but the night ones are the most memorable.
Gli arrivi invece sono più difficili da vedere, perché non ci siete mai andati!! Svegliate i neuroni sopiti!
It feels like they’re making the night to the day for some seconds
Oh god, i get so frustrated when i see "Where are the stars?" comments...
I'd bet that AT LEAST 95% of the people making that comment are trolls.
The rocket flies above the clouds, then levels out when you can no longer see it, then lands... How do you people believe this "footage." 2:55 has to be my favourite. At 8 minutes leave the video at double speed. There was no moon landing. I can't believe the intellect of this generation.
Julian S
I dont get it. Why do you think its impossible to go to the Moon?
Second, rockets *never* fly on cloudy day.
Third, in order to get into orbit, you must turn and burn towards the horizon if you want to pull the orbit out. If you are such and expert in debunking nasa, you need to be introduced with basics of orbital mechanics in order to judge what is legit and what not. Since you dont research anything, i consider you as a troll.
james dean You would have to deliberately avoid seeking an answer to your question to have never heard it explained.
The reason is a matter of exposure. To capture star light, the film/sensor must be exposed to the scene for 15-20 seconds. This is known as a shutter speed and is a MINIMUM for capturing star light. However, for the lunar photographs (and photos of the Earth from the ISS), the subjects are large and brightly lit by the sun, so to properly expose those subjects, a much shorter shutter speed is necessary. 15 full seconds is FAR too long an exposure. For the Apollo Lunar photographs, exposures between 1/60th and 1/250th of a second were used. Since at least 15 full seconds of exposure is required to capture star light on film, you should be able to imagine that an exposure of 1/60th of a second is far too short an exposure to capture star light. So, the very fact that the lunar surface is properly exposed tells anyone familiar with photography - and specifically exposure - that the settings prohibit star light from.showing up.
They COULD take photos of stars from the ISS on the dark side of Earth (and they do - just not many). The problem is again - they need 15-20 seconds of exposure and the ISS is in orbit - so the stars move a lot relative to the orientation of the camera in that time. It's difficult, so a lot of the photos of stars you get from the ISS are star trails - for this very reason.
There is no reason to attempt to take quality pictures of the stars from the ISS when things like Hubble exist. Hubble can take far better pictures because it is designed to take pictures. Ts designed to take its own orbit around Earth into account to track and maintain focus on a partuclar area of the sky. That's literally Hubble's job. When you have that, taking photographs from the ISS is more for artistic purposes than scientific.
Go outside at night with your iPhone. Take a picture of a streetlight with the stars in the background. Now count the visible stars in your picture. There won't be any. The camera exposes for the streetlight (the rocket) and in doing so, the faint stars are too dim to appear. This is basic photography.
The footage about landing and leaving from the moon view has been filmed by an important alien director, the same who directed the alien movie "Human vs Predator"
So it’s fake
No they don’t have footage of them leaving so they used another one...... brain dead
@@antoniorangel9784 No it's not fake, he's just full of shit
They left the moon with the rainbow accelerator booster. Glad they had bluetooth from the moon back to earth for the videos.
@@Buckxxxxxx1What makes You think they would have needed bluetooth to transmitt radio signals???
They cleaned the studio very well spotless
Fantastic. Incredible achievement and the icing on the cake of manned lunar exploration.
The icing on the cake- Like been there, done that? Imagine if the world acted that way after the Wright Brothers got their plane off the ground. Gee guys - been there done that no need to ever get a plane off the ground again- “icing on the cake”!
@@appletongalleryManned space travel is pointless at best and an act of rebellion against God at worst.
Just awesome...
Can't wait to watch the new Orion launch, that's going to be some show.
"I hope I'm living when we leave this solar system on a venture to find another planet earth"... Nearly 50 years ago :(
As a Scientist I believe we will not leave the solar system in 50 years. Maybe we reach Mars but more will not be possible
@@alexanderleto7287 Agree.
Wow!!! A night launch of the Saturn!! What an amazing sight.
It was nice to relive a moment that I shared with my family years ago. My dad saw to it that we were interested in the things that went on around us. At that age...I would have missed it had it not been for him and my mom!❤
I can't even imagine how awesome it would have been like to be one of the guys who walked on the moon.
I would imagine O2 must deplete incredibly quickly with the toddler like excitement
Become a Freemason and maybe you can.
Nobody walked on the moon🤓
@@queenbabymama5635 actually, quite few people walked on the moon. You seem to think there was only one moon mission, but there were several.
@@certainpointofview3860 what percentage of total freemason membership got to walk on the moon? What exactly are my chances?
45 years ago today Challenger landed. RIP Gene and Apollo. I know you really did it. Tell the story Senator Schmitt.
Schmitt sounds so happy and confident on the descent, calling Cernan "Gene-o" etc. The guy was obviously having a blast the whole time, trusting in their training and really enjoying himself during the epic event of his life. Awesome.
he's confident because it's bullshit
@@Serhya It is absolutley fake
@@aussiefan354 Well, you've got to admire them for keep doing that funny walk for several hours a day.
Yeah he was having a blast lying to millions of people, do you consider that "awesome"?
"May is the month of the year!" Those chums are delighted to be on the moon.
Very impressive movie. It is a pity that no other expeditions for the Moon have took place since then :( But we must remain optimistic for the Mars landing.
The only real comment on this bs Hollywood movie. My question is 1, where did the rover come from. 2, the moon landing capsule is totally different from the earth landing capsule?? 3, where is all the fuel stored. 3, why hasn't anyone in earth been back to the moon????
@@BCO216 Google has more friends than you
@Terrence Owen government Google been lying to gullible people for decades. At some point QandA's need to be answered to support stories being told. Many countries were racing to get to the moon, and US wanted/needed to be first by all means necessary.
@@BCO216oh wow! I had always believed this up to now, but your brilliant and well-informed analysis has completely changed my mind. You have demolished all the so-called experts and I can only assume you must be the most intelligent person ever to walk the earth
@@BCO216 I'd like to think there's no such thing as a stupid question, but all of yours seem to tow that line.
1. The rover was slung and folded against the side of the descent stage. It's very small in comparison to the lander.
2. The Lunar Module was designed for exactly that; to land astronauts on the Moon. It lacks sufficient thermal shielding to enter Earth's atmosphere; the Command Module was what the Apollo astronauts used to re-enter the atmosphere, attached to the Service Module which separates just before re-entry.
3. Fuel is stored in several tanks inside the descent and ascent stages. They're hidden from view.
4. NASA's funding peaked in 1966 but fell year after year following, especially after Apollo 11. It was decided that Skylab and the Space Shuttle would be better value for money, which is why the final missions were postponed and then cancelled. Apollo's 18 & 19 were cancelled in 1970 due to the aforementioned budget cuts, and the Saturn V rocket that was to take Apollo 20 to the Moon was reassigned as the launcher for Skylab. Going to the Moon was expensive, and required a lot of political will, as well as considerably risk to men and machine. Why return to the Moon when probes and landers could get there a lot cheaper?
such a positive attitude the whole time, joking around etc.
Cant help but think i would be in a constant state of tense paranoia of something going wrong.
Balls of steel.
Balls of deception more like it. They were sitting around in Arizona.
They did have balls of steel, but they also trained their asses off. They were prepared.
@@marshallcello1128 They we’re actors. This was a ho*ax.
If You look thorougly, the camera is often "left behind" when the astronauts move. Sometimes the camera operator knew in advance in which direction they would move and could start the panning in time.
When he followed the LM's lift off, he knew exactly when the count down should reach "zero" and started the tilt up about a second in advance.
All that 50 years ago 😂😂😂
@@personalg3754 Were You even around 50 years ago, so You know anything about What they could do in that time? I was.
@@YDDES yes, I was
@@personalg3754 Well, Then You should know they were quite advanced in that time too and just as intelligent that we are today.
@@YDDES I know all this crap is fake. I served in Desert Storm, Iraqi Freedom and years as a DOD contractor in Afghanistan. Trust me, I know what kind of fiction our government comes up with. Time is catching up with the lies but all involved will be dead.
People commenting stupid fake things:
*You know I'm something of a scientist myself.*
This is probably my favorite Apollo mission because it was so funny
Apollo 17 was the eleventh manned space mission in the NASA Apollo
programme. It was the first night launch of a U.S. human spaceflight and
the sixth and final lunar landing mission. The mission was launched at
12:33 a.m. EST on 7 December 1972, and concluded on December 19.
One of the last two men to set foot on the Moon was also the first
scientist-astronaut, geologist Harrison ("Jack") Schmitt. While Evans
circled in America, Schmitt and Cernan collected a record 109 lb (49 kg)
of rocks during three Moonwalks. The crew roamed for 34 km (21 mi)
through the Taurus-Littrow valley in their rover, discovered
orange-colored soil, and left the most comprehensive set of instruments
in the ALSEP on the lunar surface. Their mission was the last in the
Apollo lunar landing missions. The last 4 Apollo craft were used for the
three Skylab missions and the ASTP, mission in 1975.
I love how happy they were to be on the moon
I love how unhappy they were in conjunction with the interviews afterwards. After all, lying to the overall population sure takes its toll.
Happy to be in a studio, dummie
@@gustav_ostervall_92 Yea must have been pretty tough for the USSR to lie about it for their enemies protection too. And China... and India... and every other country too...
Moonlanding is one of those things i can't decide in my head do i believe it or not, there's so many things that are off about it like the black space without stars and that interview where they are almost scared for their life. In this video by the end i can see one time it looks like the guy is hanging out there with his helmet open couse his face is showing. I don't think it would be impossible to go there so did they fake the footage only? Those "simulation" s on the TV station are pretty close to the thing seen in the supposed real footage. This thing remains mystery to me at this point.
@@gustav_ostervall_92so this is a video of Apollo 17, and you’re referring to a single picture from after Apollo 11 which really isn’t the smoking gun you think it is.
oh the guys who just went through a very exhausting mission aren’t sitting like cheerleaders with fake smiles plastered on their faces 24/7? must be fake
Wow, about hit 50 years anniversary. An amazing feat showing that humans can achieve the impossible
Yup. Unfortunately that poor camera guy who filmed them leaving is still there on the moon. We should celebrate him.
@@freddybob807 lol, you must think that every drone has a tiny person inside operating the camera.
@@carlkinder8201 And you must think whatever your masters tell you to think.
@@freddybob807 I believe what science and education tell me to believe. You believe what an uneducated failed cab driver (Bart Sibrel) tells you to believe.
@@freddybob807 You can hear them at NASA talking what they'll do next as they turn that camera lens down, to a side, etc. In the Apollo 14 video you can hear the camera handler (by RC) say he will turn the camera off. Most of you unbelievers seem to think that Remote Control was unknown at the time.
Try watching some of the videos taken from the lunar rover - it drives for a long towards the distant mountains whih you claim to be backdrops, and they come no nearer or change in perspective, proving they're many miles away.
In addition, many stereo-pair images were taken, which show that the landscape is exactly what is seems: vast. If there was a backdrop 100 feet away, stereo pairs would show it up immediately.
The true color of lunar surface is pink, not grey.
Wake up!
Just curious, who was zooming/panning the camera at the time ?.. Was it being controlled from the earth?..
Could I suggest flat earthers plan a scientific mission to the underside of the earth.
How about allocating some of NASAs 18+b$ budget towards it... oh yeah all you get it cut and edited videos still bro.
@@ghostwhite1648 Flat Earthers don't even know their own underside from their mouths. That's why they dribble so much shit.
Ghost White. Not a good enough argument that it was fake. It happened a long time ago and at the time this was going to be a continuous project. Lack of enthusiasm by the public, Funding and more important and pressing issues on planet earth put an end to space exploration for the time being.. Blimey in those 50 years the importance of keeping the video safe and in its entirety perhaps as the years went by didn't seem as important. The BBC insanley taped over their coverge of the 69 moon landing because video was expensive and had to be reused. People do stupid things, but you don't need to make a conspiracy out of it.
No just tell them to travel around the Earth genius
@@juliaread2003 read what you wrote haha
There's a mirror on the surface of the Moon (Lunar Laser Ranging experiment) that we can point a laser at and measure it's distance from us. If we didn't go there, how the hell did that get there?
The sand on the moon are like glass shards, so maybe it formed naturally
Do not feed the trolls
There's also some man made shit on Mars yet no human has stepped on it's surface but I still believe man has walked on the moon.
Robotic landing craft.
However, there's a better piece of evidence that doesn't require any technical knowledge:
The Russians didn't call bullshit.
I mean, if the moon landing was faked, they probably would have known. The USSR had an unmanned spacecraft in lunar orbit at the time and probably had KGB spies infiltrating the US government and its allies (at least in British intelligence. See Oxford Five).
robotguy4
Exactly.
Lol it's so funny when the astronaut fell down at 8:52
+Chetan Bhadrashette yeah, shame it was on earth !
+Ackyman that's it... ignore all the evidence and proof, just show your ignorance instead.
+Monkeybox Gaming proof? Ha ha ha. When they going back again did you say?
Ackyman Naw silly, it was actually in space. Lol
Weell despite the entire, if he fell on a rock his suit would tear up causing him to slowley be deprived of oxygen
8:48 the cutest thing i ever seen :3
thats a astronaut struggling for hid life, if he fell hard he'd die on the moon
its not cute lol, falling on the moon is extremely dangerous
His wire kept him up slightly.
@@TheLondonCyclist you know that moon gravity is 9 times less than earths gravity. this means btw you fall 9 times slower
@@moritz7613 Did you know I'm superman?
10:08 "May is the year of the month." Oxygen running low...get back inside!
...i-
@@smoke4852 penis penis 123
@@notincaps wtf
@@smoke4852 raskoln dimitri love you
The first astronauts had unbelievably solid nuts! 😀
Poklando he rediscovered it lol, never seen someone glorify Columbus so much lol
9:56 Damn I feel a little jealousy cause they were having an awesome time on the moon. I would love to feel that experience.
+Javier Torres Just go outside and jump around - that's what the astronauts did!
Get someone to attach a wire to you above you on a scaffold, go out at night to the desert paint the sand.
That's how Nasa did it basically.
There's a lot of people on these pages that wanna attach a wire to my neck and then attach it to a scaffold! But you're right - there's plenty of nasa footage showing them using wire suspended activity. Strange how not too many can make the correlation between nasa showing them what they did and the later footage that pretends to be on the moon.
You have obviously never been to a launch. Thats a lot of power. Why waste a perfectly good rocket just to make you pendejos think it was real? As for the moon shots, well there were no wires. At 1/6th the gravity of the earth even carrying 300 pounds on a 200 pound man amounts to about 83 pounds total. On earth it would be 500 pounds. But then again I am a little prejudiced because I have had the pleasure of meeting Harrison Hagan "Jack" Schmitt, the American geologist, retired NASA astronaut, university professor and former U.S. senator from New Mexico when he was Senator here. My brother was the the lucky one though as he actually worked for the man for a few years after his astronaut days. You might want to pick up one of his books to read when you are not trolling Utube looking for trouble.
Oh Boy! You must be a s'thick as a brick? I mean, what's wrong with your brain? Why would going to the moon suddenly make you 'slow down'? Any idiot knows that agility in movement is all about 'power-to-weight' - and yet your own figures show that even suited up, and astronaut is only going to weight around 1/3 as much as he would on earth. So wouldn't that make him more agile?
But then, I guess, if you're an idiot, why would you ever reach that conclusion? You're (obviously) also so stupid, yo haven't seen the reduced-gravity simulations that nasa did, way before they ever launched anyone. That footage shows quite clearly that what you're saying is utter bullshit!
All that makes me wonder - are you from the moon? A brain made for the moon would slow down somewhat when re-located to earth. Sounds like you?
15:46 what a dream... one much more tangible back then, being that we hadn’t even sent *anything* to space a decade before going to the moon. Almost half a century later and we haven’t even gone back.
We’ve had great advances, don’t get me wrong, but imagine what would be if America still had that fervor for space, one fueled by curiosity and a spirit of exploration, rather than a Cold War
@@Momo-bb2fn
Yeah. But, very few people want to fork over their money for so few people to be able to do those explorations. For example, it took a dictatorship to fund Magellan's voyage around the world, because if left up to the general populous, they wouldn't have wanted to pay for it. Even Magellan's own country's king (Portugal) didn't want to pay for it, and that's why Magellan ended up being paid by Spain's king instead. And, Magellan's voyage costed nowhere near Apollo, not by a long shot, not even close. And, that was for hundreds of people to go, and lasted three years. Apollo costed orders of magnitude more, and only resulted in 12 men walking on the moon for a few hours each. Yeah, you're right, the cold war produced that, while we are left only imagining what would happen if the public funded things like that purely for the sake of curiosity. We, as a species, don't tend to do that very much. Most of the time, we fund voyages that we ourselves can go on. We very rarely dump that level of money, funding from hundreds of millions of people, into voyages that only a dozen people get to make. You're right, it is a bit of a shame. But, that's the reality about humanity.
@@rockethead7 exactly, only I’d change ur second sentence to “very few want to fork over their money for _exploration_ “ In my mind, people going on explorations is hardly even part of the question. I’m more referring to the technology, which in itself is an exploration, one people don’t appreciate. As u said, such is humanity
With all our advanced technology and NASA they would have gone back had they went at all. This is so fake. I do not believe they walked on the moon. This is Hollywood.
Watch the video footage of this take-off from the camera inside the LM. Watch it side-by-side with this take-off. It does not match at all. When the LM performs ‘pitch over’, absolutely no pitch over can be seen in the video from within the LM.
“Surely a mistake like this would be front page news!”
Nope, the Moon landings are perhaps the biggest real life example of the ‘Emperor has no no clothes’.
Apollo 17 was the last mission to the Moon ; at the time, no one would have thought that most of the staff at NASA, would have passed on from old age ; waiting for another Moon mission. The question is whether we see it return in our life time ?
IMO Moon travel will certainly happen in 5 years at most...can you say China..Russia ..and India...or possibly a company located in private industry but ...I seriously doubt if the USA nation as a whole..will return to the Moon during the lifetime of anyone now living who is past the age of 20
pipercub123456 Within five years to the next Moon landing ? I wish you were right, although it maybe attempted, the chance of success is extremely unlikely.
Rocket science on the scale of the Saturn 5 is so often taken for granted today !
F1 is still the most powerful built, the most reliable rocket and it made the Apollo program a success. Records show: everything else has been either too small or fails during test ; all the rest is just theory ! Once we witness some large rocket launch into the heavens ; "only then" a landing will be within 5 years at most....
We destroyed the technology and erased the tapes. It was a bad memory I guess.
@@pipercub123456this aged well ;)
Sure!
Wake up, sheep.
Imagine how exciting landing on Earth would be if you had only lived on the moon.
Yeah! You would be crawling like an amoeba in the gravity, that is 6 times what you were used to...
@@YDDES actually its about 1.6x Moons gravity not 6x
@@arcosprey4811 Moons gravity is 6 times weaker than Earths . Nothing else.
On apollo 17 they were 16 silver oxide-zinc cells. The power head operated around 430 watts. The handle contained the battery pack which could be removed from the power head but also the handle pack and power head could be removed together to allow for additional drill stems to be attached to allow for the desired depth to be achieved. The power head would then be re-attached and drilling would continue.
😊😊
😊😊
why is the NASA logo muddy. is it a sticker on the lens, (mirrored) or is it pasted after the shooting. ?????
Un beau montage de cinéma ,tous mes compliments.
Le plus grand mensonge de l'humanité surtout. Le drapeau qui flotte au vent . Plus c'est gros mieux ça passe. La reconnaissance faciale vient de mettre à jour le montage bois ,aluminium de cette mascarade. C'est le serpent qui se mort la queue .
I remember watching these blastoffs. God, how exciting they were.
That’s about the achievement of it- get the rocket off the ground and out of detection with the naked eye. The rest of Apollo was filmed on earth.
@@appletongalleryThe naked eye isn't that good for detecting things. Lots of people have to wear glasses!
@@appletongallery lol
8:46 😂😂😂haha
This is unreal,so bravo
Apollo 11 moon landing was fake, not apollo 17
It’s not fake.
Camera man is world class with the shots.
10:22 The earth and stars
lyon406 nice to see the earth from a other planet
Faaaaaakeeeee lol
@@user-ms3jo1zh2k Not you idiotic kids again...
@@user-ms3jo1zh2k moron
La cámara no está ajustada
how did they fit the rover on such a small module ?
How big do you think the rover is? It fit because it fit.
but why isn't there footage of them assembling it? they land, then......its there. and did they have time to pack it up? I have seen rover (actual one, not replicated) exhibited on display before.......
Mynamenotimportant
the lrv, the lunar roving vehicle, was actually folded into a small space, they opened a hatch on the lander and took it out by hand, its actual weight on the moon was about 35 kilograms, so it was no Problem at all
Mynamenotimportant
Hi, here's some footage of the rover being deployed on the moon;
/watch?v=-ShauSWcTC4
And here's the procedure being tested on earth;
/watch?v=ObEjEEfnBj8
I hope that helps.
***** Typical NASA
Awesome! .. thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿
Simply Amazing
Actually, Apollo 11 was close to an abort of the landing. They were nearly out of descent fuel when they landed. The autopilot was steering them into a boulder field and Armstrong had to take manual control, and steer the LM to a viable landing site.
When they were preparing to ascend, they discovered that a switch, vital to arming the ascent engine had been broken, and Armstrong had to poke a pen into the hole where the switch had been. Otherwise they would have been stuck on the moon.
Of all switches that could break lol
Cool story bro
@@MattyEngland Did you understand any of it?
@@bennyskim Well you've got an F in your report and that pretty much sums up your life as well
They behaved exact the way I would do on moon because: YOLO 🙃
This is movie
@@rameshchinnasandra9115 maybe, science fiction ...
how the lunar module reattaches to the rocket/ spaceship?? just trying to learn
You can tell they are nearly floating with the low moon gravity. 100% real.
Dust properties prove it 100%.
Actually, they doctored the recording of the "astronaut" walking in terms of changing the video to slow-motion. In normal speed, the astronauts are seen walking or running, and the prevalence of gravity becomes all to clear.
😂🤣
The moon landings are as valid as the theories of gravity.
ThePariss333 Yep
ThePariss333 are you the humanoid?
ThePariss333 more than you. It is hard to read your poorly constructed sentences. One can only imagine the thought processes behind them. They are a glimpse of a chaotic mind at work. Run back home to big brother.
ThePariss333 I agree with you, you are sorry. You want to call people humanoids and then whine and cry foul when that term is applied to you. I know where you are located by what is coming from you. I agree that you are not a humanoid, but a hemorrhoid.
Today’s the 50th anniversary of the Apollo 17 lunar landing!
😂😂
Who was recording the shuttle from the outside?
Awesome the view of the Earth,half sleeping,half awake. 10:17
if you speed the moon walking by x2 you just see normal people in suits running in earths atmosphere
uh okay?
you are correct ...i still think all was fake
But the arms and legs move all to fast and jerky…
but there is no evidence, instead for the trip to the moon there are 400,000
I would love to see the earth from the moon. Just looking at the blue marble in the sky.
Space*
@@dotdot607 . It takes a while before you can completely see the earth
How did they filmed the return?
At 1:38 When he goes, "Houston we're right in the middle of a snowstorm", notice all the orbs moving in random direction. He was speaking in code.
What do you mean
It’s amazing how they can’t get back but they got there in 1972
Momohead That's funny... They have a projected manned Lunar mission for 2024. Research !!!
@Please Complete All Fields do you just chime in yet know nothing about the subjects you chime in on? There is literally Millions of tons of vast resources, such as but not limited to, H3, water ice, the need for solar expansion, ECT. Come on guys, research!
@Please Complete All Fields again. Do some research. Maybe you won't sound like you don't understand why we need to go back.
@Please Complete All Fields that's a sign of intelligent research, I may have pegged you wrong mate. Good show
Momohead They’re already planning a fucking mission Dumbass. The main reason they went was to beat the Soviet Union there in the space race. Truly another dumbass who’s just fucking jealous they wasted their lives unlike the people who actually landed.
In the 2019 it's ridiculous
Man will soon be back on the moon , space exploration is getting very interesting again .
This is Awesome I don't know why people would say it's fake. It's just a sham people don't believe. If they just would open their eyes they could see the bigger picture.
Not your eyes you need to open, it's your mind.
@@kingpabsgaming8156and their eyes cause this sh1t fake af
Yeah crazy people don't believe the government. They are always so honest.
Great movie. I love practical fx
50 years ago you could fly 400,000 km to the moon. only 400 km today. really sad
That has absolutely zero to do with ability. It's amazing that there are still people who think that somehow the ability to fly the moon has been 'lost' somehow.
Sad²
It has to do with it being a hoax.
Its a money grab for a group of hijackers. Take a few business classes and learn about 2008 crash and how these guys pull of these scams.
Its a ponzi scheme
Thats why no commercial flight exists , you or anyone you know has ever been in orbit, why ISS story makes little sense and has no video of the actual construction from beginning module in orbit at 27,000km an hour, and why no videos of anything in orbit exist other than fake iss shotz.
We have pictures of ISS in orbit , where are the hours of third party video footage of ISS in orbit
@@trinivagrant Apollo 11 does have video from the command ship view of the lunar rover landing.
@@scottnukend I would compare space to underwater. In the 60s went hundreds of thousands of KM to visit the moon.
At this point 60 years later with trillions spent I imagine if adjust inflation and add all space programs it's odd there is hardly any videos in space showing the splendors of space like the millions of minutes of underwater footage available.
Satellites also supposedly have camera capabilities for spy reasons and tens of thousands in existence and there is less than 5 minutes of satellites in orbit and all the splendors of space.
How was the craft filmed , from what ? I can understand the pictures coming from the camera inside the craft, but not the ones of the craft, unless they were filmed from the space telescope?
The Apollo space craft consisted of three parts. The LM (which is actually two stages), the command module and the service module. The LM separated from the command/service module and went down to land on the moon. Every Apollo mission had 3 astronauts. 2 went down to the surface while the third stayed in the command module and remained in lunar orbit for the duration the other two were on the surface. The footage of the LM in space was taken by that third astronaut in the command module.
Lindo trabalho.
No minuto 8:50 , um cabo puxa o astronauta para tras e ele cai. Esse cabo colocado nas costas do astronauta servia para simular os movimentos do mesmo na Lua.
why is the video quality so poor?
bruh this was 1972 and even that they had to get cameras that can withstand the pressure of the trip
19:43 Who filmed this part?
It is a robot camera controlled from the earth
@@serhatlindemann4327 and yet we cant even get clear signal for a cell phone here on earth.... mhmmm you gotta be guillible and naiive to believe this.
@@sergiolandz6056 its anolog which explains everything if your a boomer
No can answer as this is all not real.
We would have thousands of hours of actual space footage if we had capability to do that
Randy James , thanks for being that one idiot . Your village misses you, go back to it.
13:10 what is that thing on the right that seems to appear out of no where??
it's there the whole time, it just comes out of shadow
You eloquent defence of your contention that the Apollo missions had a backdrop 100ft away continues to impress me.
People be like "where are all the stars" and I be like "it's day time,the moon just doesn't have a blue sky"
Because the cameras are set to expose the lunar surface, which is so bright that in order to show any detail, the cameras need to be set very very dark. If you were standing there and you looked up, your eyes would adjust and you would see everything
@@AustinALiboiron i dont know at the press conference one said yes and the other said no... so yeah fck them liars !!
Stars should be visible in daytime on atmosphere-less Earth, as well.
Your counter argument is actually borderline idiotic and self-defeating.
@southport97 those rocks actually offered a lot of information about the geologic composition of the moon, and the Apollo Landings program yielded a vast amount that later contributed to human space exploration like the International Space Station.
man,i wish i was one of them!imagine the filling to be standing on the moon.crazy awesome!!!!!
*Apollo 17* : That's that and were done!
*Artemis 1* : Hold My Beer, were going back!
Also Artemis- “it will take us another 30 years because space flight is hard”.
You are going nowhere buddy. First "real" moon mission not before 2040 and first human on mars not before 2100
@@deltaiii3158 moon landing was real, cope
To all of you conspiracionists: Why did even the Soviet Union accepted this?
WE sent them wheat and grains, check it out. They also, being our enemy, collected the imager and gave it back to us. COLD War mortal enemies, and they gave it back. Imagine that, lol.
Did the Pakastani's give us our parts from the downed helos when we "killed" osama? What about our drones that are captured when they go down? Your enemy doesnt just hand over things unless they have something to gain from it.
@@user-ym9wb2mk5e That was the most retarded, illegible comment I've ever had the displeasure of reading. Thank you.
Tomorrow I make sammich...
@@user-ym9wb2mk5e about 1/4 of that comment was legible
My respect for the cameraman is increasing day by day
He works in studio.
@@vcare4893 😂😂
How did they get that huge vehicle on that little space ship
If this is all faked, why did they have so many problems? Hell, the first landing, Armstrong had to almost abort, and careen over the surface looking for a place free of boulders. Why fake that? For excitement? If so, why not fake more excitement in later missions?
The point is, deniers have responses to all those questions, but their answers are simply arbitrary. They just try to stir up dust, and hope that in the cloud of speculation they generate, people will get confused, shrug, and say “I guess so.” No wonder they think NASA lies. They’re so used to telling people bullshit, they expect that all other people ALSO want to tell bullshit rather than the truth. A liar thinks everybody lies all the time. I don’t know what emotional need this solves for these people.
I think they justifiably feel taken advantage of by modern commercialism, so they assume things have always been that way. Well, they weren’t. It’s hard to believe how different the world was before the internet and social media and smartphones.
Hey, go fake your own Moon landing!
Good words..100% true
What you say comes from your ignorance about the evidence that disproves your ridiculous allegations.
so it's more easy travel to the moon than manufacture an hd camera.
At least for the rocket engineers...
Yan
It depends what you mean by an "hd" camera.
Photographic film is high definition, and they had excellent film cameras.
It doesn’t help that this video was taken from a VHS tape. If you have the chance, watch the new Apollo 11 documentary in the movie theater, it will blow your mind with the amazingly detailed 70 mm footage.
dumbass
No. It's choice and preference over other. They interested in exploration. HD camera ain't give nothing.
Uma importante conquista para a humanidade, em tudo que fazemos é preciso ousadia. Parabéns!
Why did the camera pan down just as he was going into the hatch? Was he too small to fit?
When are you talking about? Timestamp? And, how can he be too small to fit? I wouldn't even understand what that would mean.
@@rockethead7
18:57
Hey, I have a question for you. What type of display was the large screen used in mission control during Apollo 11 when they first viewed the EVA on the lunar surface?
Ok I just found the answer. Writing the question in the comment gave me the right words to put into a google search.
Eidophor rear projection screen.
ArsTechnica has a very good article titled Apollo Flight Controller 101: Every console explained.
@@dansv1
No idea. Sorry.
The Saturn V was a sight to behold,a monster of a rocket,who would of thought something that big could fly.
Manned space travel is an act of rebellion against God.
That's one small step for a man - one giant leap for Hollywood
and your mothers one small moment with stranger in a backstreet porn video made one giant turd of a man....
Can`twait for the Artemis program!
Was this live or is it edited?
When you went on one of the most important missions ever, but there are people who think it was all faked:
[Angry astronaut noises]
Cause its fake
WAYNE ROONEYTM why? Cause you don't understand how they did it?
Great work of Kubrick.
@@Leofiora, it was a great shout to film on location, Kubrick. Would’ve been an order of magnitude harder to do all that on Earth on a sound stage... 😉
@@oscarpinchen4431 it's a Great FX scene, like " A 2001 Space Odyssey "🥱🥱
Impresionante ver el despegue nocturno del Saturno V. Que poder...Ese moustruo podia poner en OBT casi 120 Tn. POr otra parte, el ML que vemos despegar, tenia una llama casi sin brillo. Eso es por el tipo de combustible (es como los cohetes que queman alcohol o hidrogeno, que la llama es azul)
8:51 rip astronaut
19:42 If the camera is outside of the spacecraft on the surface of the moon recording how do we have the video…? 🤔
That camera wasn't outside of the window, that was filmed through the window. It's a compilation of various footage taken. Also, cameras can be mounted outside of spacecraft, as we've seen with the Space X footage.
This is awesome. Wish I could go to the moon.
"Apollo Program"
Producer: Walt Disney deceased at that time.
Co-producer: Wernher Von Braun.
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Art Director: John Hoesli.
Writer: Arthur C Clarke.
Photographer: Geoffrey Unsworth.
Total cost = 169.51 billion current dollars.....
Something very logical is that the Apollo missions were carried out in the 🌎because if it had been true that NASA in 1962 sent its first astronaut into space, taking just "6" years to take them to the 🌙 because in 1968 they orbited it, in 1969 they walked on it , in 1972 they were for the last time, bone today "50" years later at least we were vacationing in the 🌒 and traveling to Mars.
Heyneken2156. Liar.
heyneken2156 What was Kubrick ”directing”? What the different instruments in the modules were supposed to do, or How they should move on ”Moon”? He was an expert of nothing of it.
Shhhh...! The Earth is Flat! Nothing and no one can enter or leave this Kingdom...
@@damianista Except the meteorites… 🤪
Walt Disney was a great story teller
Já pensou uma missão dessas hoje exibida em HD?
The answer is Artemis mission my friend coming soon from 2024
pois, nunca aconteceu..
@@djblazeptنعم لم يخرج احد من الارض
@@sheetalagarwalla1241لم يخرج احد من هذه الارض ولم ذهبوا للقمر
who hold the camera and recording all of these. Once i thought camera must fit in the space craft but when i saw image of itself i was like who is all doing this..?
Just like pictures of the ISS. How were those captured because where are the third party videos of iss in orbit around the planet!
@Off The Cuff you mean the satellites that have no footage and there well over 10,000 of them. Yah right
@Off The Cuff Just stating facts that's all.
@Off The Cuff There is no footage of satellites. 0 for 12,000 plus. Bigfoot has made more appearances
Using fairy tales to describe fairy tales
There was a TV camera on the rover that was controlled from mission control by a man named Ed Fendell.
RIP Gene Cernan
Roger Clemons: Make the world a better place and go hang.
Yes humans have landed on the moon. Yes humans have a international space station in orbit around earth. Yes we have orbiting satellites around earth.
I am sickened by the fact that i have to adress these obvious facts to trolls and idiots who are probably now gonna try there hardest to prove me wrong in the comments and start whining like babies.
They’re uneducated and lazy. Not a good combination
Who was president at the time and what was his nickname?
The iss is true, more than 15 countries thanks to russia put that castle in orbit, but this is really fake, is imposible even with nowadays tech
@@SantiagoVelezRestrepo where do you get your opinion that it is impossible, 'even with nowadays tech's from?
That is complete bollocks.
Ya don't forget the flat earthers
You just gotta love the small pop of an explosion that apparently lifted them off the moon high enough to escape the moons gravity and meet up with a mother ship in the moons orbit ROFL
The 'small pop' that you think was the actual engine was the explosive charge that released the ascent module from the whole assembly. You can't see the plume from the engine, as the fuel burned with a clear discharge.
@@ChrisPBacon777lol if you believe that I got beachfront property in oklahoma to sell ya
@@450farf if you don't understand how reality works, then that makes it clear why you think you have a beachfront property nowhere near the ocean, or why you have no clue how things work in space 🤦
@@ChrisPBacon777 lol exactly. What we’re seeing in the Apollo 17 lm footage is simply a model being pulled up over a fake backdrop. It’s very cartoonish, early sci fi movie utilized same techniques. Laughable today but hey they couldn’t predict the future
@@450farf 'lol exactly'
Well, at least you agree you're clueless.
I also think you need to use more 'lols'. You're not very convincing, except for how clueless you are 🤪
Maybe more lols will help.
Can somebody explain to me why the footage looks so bad in terms of quality? 2001 was filmed a few years prior to this and is still looking great. Were these cinematic cameras too big to be brought on this mission or is there another reason?
Most of the video you see was transmitted live (a couple of seconds of transmission delay). With the exception of the videos they took with the hand-held 16mm film camera, most of the video from Apollo 15/16/17 was taken with an RCA field sequential scanning TV camera, mounted to the front of the rover, and transmitted back to Earth, live, as it was happening. Not film. This meant that they didn't have a heck of a lot of "bandwidth" (using that term loosely, because it was analog, not digital) for HD signals. So, it was only a few hundred lines of resolution at best. And, making matters worse (for picture quality), they used a very lightweight camera that only had one video pickup. Most color TV cameras used three pickups (red, green, blue), back in those days, which not only meant they had 3 lenses and pickups, but also big bulky electronics to combine the 3 signals into one. But, to save on weight and size (they didn't want a big heavy camera bouncing around on the front of the rover), they went with a single pickup camera. So, how did they make colors with only one pickup? They put a small spinning color wheel (Google "RCA color wheel") behind the lens in order to make a single pickup be able to deal with multiple colors. This doesn't produce as good of a picture as a true 3-pickup camera. But, it did the job, was light, portable, didn't break from bouncing around, was remote controlled from Houston, and was able to send live video 238,000 miles.