26:08 No flame , the professor's honesty in this context is refreshing . The preemptive emphasis on dubious IP security I guess has cost many innovators valuable funds .
A man who chose Manchester Uni because they agreed to employ his wife so he could work alongside her. He could have chosen any number of Universities around the world. The measure of the man IMNSHO.
"Don't believe in Magic". And don't need to when you can fabricate devices in Circuitry that are formed by Mathemagical Fusion-Fission Function, it's materialisation engineering of Bose-Einsteinian coherence-cohesion sync-duration resonance shell-horizons containment of quantization.
He authored a review paper (on his own) and invented the term "wonder material". Another paper did *not* exaggerate Graphene's extreme weight to strength ratio, although the detail of how point loading was modelled and tested for a material with a thickness of a single carbon atom. Graphene Industries (Established 2006, still trading) sold tiny flakes for a lot of money for "such a cheap atom". He does not mention "Alternate Matter" which is Australian (I think) Goes onto say "Few companies, selling by the hectare." After the Nobel, large companies shied away.
Materials ❤ he did not believe in the tarmac approach, he does not properly refer to the sponsor, National Highways Authority correctly. Recipes for materials...it's not his group doing the winning of contracts... So fast and so slow is interesting - she says 40 years for Si and same could be for Al - now used in tonnes x 10⁶. Then the dolphin story! 😂😂😂
And as if on cue a young ?undergrad asks "What other forms of carbon exist?" We are all so constrained...Professor while you give us the answer another patent is filed in the US or China... I have expected the Chancellor to have announced our nation's contribution to the 20th century, but no we get an incredible insight that the UKs Minister for Science can only speak freely once no longer in office. Astounding...and actually a massive insight onto how it works. Now for that other Graphene video
Some mismatch between the competency of the professor in the context of questions from his funders and political supporters...and the expectations of a youtube audience. The questions and answers are actually deeply insightful but remain frustrating for everyone who is "in Science for Engineering" Interesting that he is frustrated by her: "Oh Nancy..." and follows with his "can we eat dolphins?" story. He is so "laid back" on Superconducting graphene? Good questions from the audience too
Pure hype grapheme. Useless material which has sucked in money that could be more profitably used elsewhere. I hear now they are trying to put the graphene layers back together. This may well be fruitful and I believe could result in a new material called graphite which could result in a novel writing instrument which I call a pencil!
Perhaps change the name of the city to Graphenia! Perhaps even declare independence before London completely collapses from Wall Street machinations! ;-) Only half-joking
He seemed reluctant to be there. Reluctant to speak. She kept asking him about applications of graphene. He said he’s not an expert in its applications. Wrong questions to wrong person. Horrible frustrating experience for me.
I'm sorry and I found it so too, but she is politics-adminstration and he is fundamental research i would say he is in the spectrum and both are neuro-atypical. His reference to Don Quixote when questioned by TES is insightful. She delights in the story about George Osborne said "Any advanced nation should value the importance of knowledge and discovery." While Andre retorts the public demand bread and circuses,😂 and then describes a dystopian future where we forget how semiconductors work. I think he is not the best communicator...but I am well-fascinated by what he is saying and not saying
26:08 No flame , the professor's honesty in this context is refreshing . The preemptive emphasis on dubious IP security I guess has cost many innovators valuable funds .
Can't comprehend the English of the Professor. Great interview anyhow. Many thanks for posting. 👍👍👍
I had to put captions on
It's hard listening for sure
If you can't understand the man, just put it on 1.25x or 1.5x playback speed.
It does wonders.
If you can't understand the man, just put it on 1.25x or 1.5x playback speed.
It does wonders.
200 Years! Congratulations! ©❇©❇©❇©🔆🔆🔆
A man who chose Manchester Uni because they agreed to employ his wife so he could work alongside her. He could have chosen any number of Universities around the world. The measure of the man IMNSHO.
"Don't believe in Magic". And don't need to when you can fabricate devices in Circuitry that are formed by Mathemagical Fusion-Fission Function, it's materialisation engineering of Bose-Einsteinian coherence-cohesion sync-duration resonance shell-horizons containment of quantization.
Thank you
Soon he spoke the devil from WORLD ECONOMICFORM.There fools.
He authored a review paper (on his own) and invented the term "wonder material". Another paper did *not* exaggerate Graphene's extreme weight to strength ratio, although the detail of how point loading was modelled and tested for a material with a thickness of a single carbon atom.
Graphene Industries (Established 2006, still trading) sold tiny flakes for a lot of money for "such a cheap atom". He does not mention "Alternate Matter" which is Australian (I think)
Goes onto say "Few companies, selling by the hectare." After the Nobel, large companies shied away.
Materials ❤ he did not believe in the tarmac approach, he does not properly refer to the sponsor, National Highways Authority correctly. Recipes for materials...it's not his group doing the winning of contracts... So fast and so slow is interesting - she says 40 years for Si and same could be for Al - now used in tonnes x 10⁶. Then the dolphin story! 😂😂😂
And as if on cue a young ?undergrad asks "What other forms of carbon exist?"
We are all so constrained...Professor while you give us the answer another patent is filed in the US or China... I have expected the Chancellor to have announced our nation's contribution to the 20th century, but no we get an incredible insight that the UKs Minister for Science can only speak freely once no longer in office. Astounding...and actually a massive insight onto how it works.
Now for that other Graphene video
I wonder what Geim thinks of Beer and Moudrianakis' isolation of graphene in 1959.
He apparently has strong affinity for beer, but that might be too hasty.
Some mismatch between the competency of the professor in the context of questions from his funders and political supporters...and the expectations of a youtube audience.
The questions and answers are actually deeply insightful but remain frustrating for everyone who is "in Science for Engineering"
Interesting that he is frustrated by her: "Oh Nancy..." and follows with his "can we eat dolphins?" story.
He is so "laid back" on Superconducting graphene?
Good questions from the audience too
graphene so great it has injured most of thr population with slowd34th.
Pure hype grapheme. Useless material which has sucked in money that could be more profitably used elsewhere. I hear now they are trying to put the graphene layers back together. This may well be fruitful and I believe could result in a new material called graphite which could result in a novel writing instrument which I call a pencil!
Perhaps change the name of the city to Graphenia!
Perhaps even declare independence before London completely collapses from Wall Street machinations!
;-) Only half-joking
He seemed reluctant to be there.
Reluctant to speak.
She kept asking him about applications of graphene.
He said he’s not an expert in its applications.
Wrong questions to wrong person.
Horrible frustrating experience for me.
I'm sorry and I found it so too, but she is politics-adminstration and he is fundamental research i would say he is in the spectrum and both are neuro-atypical.
His reference to Don Quixote when questioned by TES is insightful.
She delights in the story about George Osborne said "Any advanced nation should value the importance of knowledge and discovery." While Andre retorts the public demand bread and circuses,😂 and then describes a dystopian future where we forget how semiconductors work. I think he is not the best communicator...but I am well-fascinated by what he is saying and not saying