I do think this deck being so cheap contributes to the high representation which helps it have 35% of tops. Also just so consistent into almost every matchup
@@TheReal_InkwellGaming yeah but it still has a healthy representation in online events. Maybe because it’s what people know? Or maybe it really is just that good. No bad matchups
If you meant 18 cards or 70% the same you’d be right. You’re not even playing 4 of the best card in the deck in rabbit or the best 2 drop in snake. Let me repeat terrible list.
Take out 1 Cuzco, 2 queen, 2 Eric. Add in 2 snake 2 rabbit 1 other (usually 3rd crab or 4th surfur) and you have a normal list...so 5 cards different i.e. 92% cookie cutter. So again take the best deck change 5 cards to achieve a slightly different goal.
You’re just doubling down on having no clue what the meta actually looks like. Like I said the first time your list is 18 cards off the “cookie cutter” build. The reason why people play similar decks is because they’re the best things you can be doing. If you’re giving people advice why would you encourage them to not play the best possible cards in the archetype? Especially when they’re dirt cheap.
@azarsgp what are these 18 cards? You realize I track every available top into a spreadsheet. Included is a deck core of 1st and 2nd place lists but your right. Only using 30+ top 2 R/A lists backs me up but hey. Continue chasing the META. Just be careful chasing means your always behind
It blows my mind that every other color got really good but this still throws hands with em
Very cool deck and its not too expensive
It’s crazy how the best deck is still cheap, just because every other deck uses steel for some reason, and steel is so expensive
I do think this deck being so cheap contributes to the high representation which helps it have 35% of tops. Also just so consistent into almost every matchup
@@TheReal_InkwellGaming yeah but it still has a healthy representation in online events. Maybe because it’s what people know? Or maybe it really is just that good. No bad matchups
This list is terrible
Curious as to why? Swap like 6 cards and it's every other cookie cutter list...90% is the same.
If you meant 18 cards or 70% the same you’d be right. You’re not even playing 4 of the best card in the deck in rabbit or the best 2 drop in snake. Let me repeat terrible list.
Take out 1 Cuzco, 2 queen, 2 Eric. Add in 2 snake 2 rabbit 1 other (usually 3rd crab or 4th surfur) and you have a normal list...so 5 cards different i.e. 92% cookie cutter. So again take the best deck change 5 cards to achieve a slightly different goal.
You’re just doubling down on having no clue what the meta actually looks like. Like I said the first time your list is 18 cards off the “cookie cutter” build. The reason why people play similar decks is because they’re the best things you can be doing. If you’re giving people advice why would you encourage them to not play the best possible cards in the archetype? Especially when they’re dirt cheap.
@azarsgp what are these 18 cards?
You realize I track every available top into a spreadsheet. Included is a deck core of 1st and 2nd place lists but your right. Only using 30+ top 2 R/A lists backs me up but hey. Continue chasing the META. Just be careful chasing means your always behind