On the test fires the thing absolutely decimated T-72 insides without even penetrating in(first shot, the crew wasn't familiar with the gun). All of it's insides were thrown out of their spots like radios, loading mechanism, commander sights, etc. So overpenning like this is a lucky thing for the crew
152mm Russian rail gun at 10.0, no coaxial MG and ammo in the back of the turret. This Thing feel similar to a certain russian TD at 7.7 with very very long gun but with some survival abilities. Obj 120 but Mbt, I guess
Love how a Soviet prototype with a massive railgun plus relative ammo has 13 secs of autoloader fill, meanwhile Type 90/10 still are on a suicide watch for how slow are to reload...
@@alexmaximus9134 maybe i said it wrong, try again. This tank will refill the autoloader in 13 sec per round (with massive two-piece rounds). Meanwhile Type 90/10 take ages to do the same thing with single piece ammo (the autoloader refill was once buffed, then quickly removed). It's not the "fire rate".
@@Sh-epard Oh, now i get it. Idk the autoloader replenishment speed for those tanks. Not even for the russian MBTs, as i don't take that many shells anyway.
@@alexmaximus9134 it's relative faster on T-serie tanks than any other autoloaded or two-piece ammo western tank. Even the Challenger 1 and 2 are slower on refill their first stage ammo...but what i'm saying, of course they are. Those two tanks are British, Gaijin hates British tanks.
Its not that hard unless your that bad at the game, averaging 1000 points a game with the average 10 min game you only need max 4 hours per day and this is worst case scenario. Unless you want to make it tradeable then maybe but I dont see why youd want to
@@burneracc2567 How does it take you 9 hours, I'm guessing for a single mark of distinction. It was a little less during the TOG event but it took me 3-4 hours to achieve 35k mission score playing at 6.3.
@@The_War_Pug yeah, it's not that hard but I like to throw in a few air and naval battles if I get frustrated with ground, and those can last full 24 minutes.
So basically trades ERA for a juicy 152mm and good pen, has slightly worse armour then a t-80, and a pretty bad long reload, I would say it’s best used as a sniper or support honestly, the onion survival chart of do not be hit should basically be drilled into your head when you play this I guess
That’s why you use its top speed to get to a good flank. Open maps is where this thing will stomp. You shouldn’t take this thing out in city maps at all unless you don’t have any other vehicle. I would say, I am primarily a sniper player, I don’t like brawls unless I know I have the advantage, so seeing this tank play into all of my strengths is making me salivate lmao.
Obj262 Best use i think as medium range sniping Long range won't be good since it has no thermal, you can't see shit if it's heavy foliage map In BR 10.0 sprut is better sniper with 3BM60 and thermal
Ah yes, replenishing the autoloader with 152mm shells with only 2 crew, none of which are a dedicated loader, faster than a Challenger 1/2 with a dedicated loader. Definitely no Russian bias here.
Every single time a russian tank gets added you always cry, hows that victim complex going for you? If russia is so overpowered then just play that nation.
@@supersarge24 T-80BV in game is T-80B 1978 + V standing for Kontakt-1 ERA, so it has the name T-80BV. Late T-80B 1984 and early T-80U 1986 have same UFP layout. T-80BV is upgraded from 2 versions of T-80B, mod 1978 and mod 1984 with Kontakt-1 ERA.
@@supersarge24 T-80B / Object 219R (1978): This model had a new turret with improved composite armor, laser rangefinder, new fire-control system, new autoloader and missile launcher system capable of firing 9M112-1 Kobra antitank guided missile through the gun barrel.[63] An improved, 1,100 hp, engine was added in 1980, a new gun in 1982. A night sight TPNZ-49 in active mode reached 1,300 m and a passive - 850 m.[65] T-80BV (1985): T-80BV (model 1985) is a T-80B upgraded with Kontakt-1 ERA on turret and hull. Smoke discharges are re-positioned to make a room on the turret for ERA. There is a new gun 2A46M-1 with 9K112 Kobra system capable of firing improved 9M112M Kobra ATGM through gun barrel. T-80BV also introduced a new 5 part armor array on the hull unlike the old 3 part T-80B. T-80B's were upgraded with applique armor 30mm high hardness steel plate to increase its protection to the same level.
@@duykhanh2k1321 It's a T-80BV. Both the uparmored T-80B and the one with K1 ERA were referred to as T-80BV, generally the ERA protected one is referred to as T-80B(V) to avoid confusion.
yup this is definitely 10.0 and will stay that way for around 6 months to a year before they change it, but of course the hstvl keeps getting nerfed into the ground
Mister whine. You as a typical schoolboy can be mislead by a number. Like there's no hidden(small font) text IRL. And like in 10 years of Release Beta Test of Bug Tuhunder there's no hidden stats. like damage.
Gaijin seems to think that all Soviet era prototype tanks that never saw service are somehow all giga wunderwaffe tanks with uber guns that can overpen a MBT decades newer than it while being as fast as an F1 car and can survive a FAB-5000 dropped directly down its drivers hatch
@@sxbcdbfxs7069 1. Other nation have fewer prototypes in-game 2. Those prototypes have less power than USSR prototype + service tank have more power than own prototype
gaijin just adds every single russian prototype they hear about, even if they never made it past concept blueprints it still gets added into the game at an insanely low br, all "object ____" NEVER SAW COMBAT ONCE, MOST WHERE NEVER EVEN BUILT BUT GAIJIN IS LIKE "HM YES WE ADD", AND.... ironically... they removed 3 german tanks from the game "cuz they never saw combat" like dude i wanted to play a tiger 2 with a 105mm gun and then they 1984'ed it out of the game just to re-add it later as a russian premium in a new skin, good armor, good gun SAME THING.
A well-balanced Soviet MBT I can only see it useful at long-distance sniping. At CQC, a single mistake can get you killed. Single miss and you are screwed,especially having the Abrams/Merkava buffed Reload. Same situation with T-90M. You miss,no going back. It is safe to say people should not overestimate the tank.
@user-yq6nd7zk4r At least they won't have difficulties aiming and penetrating at longer distances. If you mean camping as in sitting in one position all game long,at top tier, it's not much going to work. But as in sitting around the corner waiting is more of a stand off who's patience will run out or have someone flank you. Personally, I'll use the 292 like a moving sniper,like in Stalingrad, where sitting too long in one position can get you killed.
@cactuslietuva Luck is barely needed for sniping,skill on the other hand is. Thermals just aid in identifying the enemy vehicle easier,whitout it would be difficult but not impossible. I still see it as a well-balanced MBT
Probably way more than $500 just because of how ludicrous the amount of points to convert the coupon to sellable is. There won't be enough of them floating around on the marketplace. If the tank turns out to be even remotely desirable I bet we see a new record high for vehicle cost.
Did you forget it has great armor for 10.0? Only two tanks can pen its ufp at its br. It will do absolutely fine in a duel at any range with a half decent player. It may struggle a bit against multiple tanks but those tanks still have to hit relatively smal weakspots
@@casematecardinal and its breach area is much stronger compared to other ussr tanks, and it cant be ammoracked from the front lowerplate as its carusel sits higher.
Better armor, gun, and lineup. The abrams for being a higher br gets better gun handleing and mobility double the reload(given you have an aced crew and havent lost your loader) and gen 1 thermals which really dont make thay much difference. Oh and a machinegun. The abrams definitely has advantages but in a duel its fucked most of the time
hahah cope your tanks are worse Jokes aside, while the Object 292 does deserve to be around 10.0 (maybe 10.3), in its current state, the Abrams is really underpowered due to how Gaijin implemented its composites (chobham should be a lot more effective than it is now). Honestly, Gaijin should’ve put the Object 292 in the game at 11.3 or 11.7 with an ahistorical “it got ERA” setup (as if it was ever deployed the tank would’ve basically just been a T-80BV with a 152mm gun)
@@AUsernameWeShallMarchToKievit’s got 10.7 armor when looking at only the Russians and 11.7 armor if you look at minor nations, a 12.3-12.7 round, gun handling on par with anything up to 10.7 in the Russian tree, better mobility than anything in the Russian T-72 line other than the 11.3 T-72B3. The thing should be minimum 11.0-11.3.
@@casematecardinal i honestly feel like the abrams should be moved down to 10.0, it has a overall better lineup there. The germans too get a budget leo 2 with a 105 at 10.0, i dont see why the abrams is much higher. Lastly, it wont be seeing 11.3 matchmaker. Dont get me wrong, i do well in the abrams but it really suffers in uptiers with only m774
Great, just when work gets busy. I just see a big big big gun thats like to be blacked out and not usable because it soaks up shrapnel like my ex soaks up *ocks.
another "my brain is sleeping during winters, hybernates" guy. What about damage? And bugs this thing is going to be more afraid of simply because it shoots rarer? Oh you didn't think about it, who'd think. And what about damage? Another thing you assume instead of being sceptical after all "presents" by snail.
Finally I Can kills leos and strv from front armor lol, I can shoot lower plate but it's only damaged the engine and not kill the crew (leo A7 and strv)
Well its russia so give it 9 months. If it were Chinese, give it 7. If it were sweedish 6. Same if it were german. 3 months for Israeli or Japanese. 2 months if it were American or British and a month if it were french or Italian
@@casematecardinaldear witnesses of AMÊRIQUA ZUFFERZ. Could you tell me how it happened that Russia that never sees nerfs" had being annihilated by NATO spam of G-91 and FB-4(naval sabre) with NORDs and BULLPUPs for 3.5 years before Bias Russia have seen something alike? Like any of AGMs? Or you're going to say "zis iz zi different!"?
@@masonicrat The difference is the tog is slow as fuck, a large target for air and ground vehicles and once you get the smoke cannon with the additional, non-functional MG blocks on either side, you would have a massive weak spot. The 292 has; A small silhouette, armour that isn't realistic, a cannon with fuck off penetration, better than any tank in the game, and decent mobility (unlike the TOG). ERA with Biased values. And will be put at a BR where everything will die to it and it will be killable only in the common weak spots at the front. (driver hatch, lower glacis) It's fundamentally a better sniping tank than the tanks intended for sniping (The Challenger 2s) because its penetration is far better than the L27 round, the same round that should have 700mm of pen (especially to make up for the piss poor armour)
I honestly can’t tell if this thing gonna be op or situational but still leaning towards the latter. Imo this thing should be a bit higher in br, maybe 10.7 or 11.0 ?
@@zer0asanumber have you looked at its armor? its pretty stong. i mean its more survivable than the turms-t, mainly because of its high hardness armour, much stronger breach and the fact that it cant be ammoracked from the front lowerplate(ammo sits higher) its gotta be 11.0 minimum. its much more survivable than lelercs, arietes, type 10s, leo 2a5/6 and merkavas and it has the best round in the game.
@@konna6130 lol have you ever heard of the t72b 1989??? That thing has tge best armour at 10.0 with contact 5 era and still it's easy to kill. Just aim at the lfp driver hatch or breech and easy kill. Doesn't matter what you say its still a typical soviet rank with crap post pen survivability. Gun is complete overkill and unnecessary. Nothing this 152mm apfsds can do at 10.0 that 3mb42 can't do If you struggle to kill soviet tanks it's a big skill issue sorry. Get gud at aiming... Btw I can tell you never played top tier soviet mbs how the is the obj 292 more survivable than lea 2a6????
@@konna6130 not true lol and even if it was, it would not be any harder to kill than a t64B You must be joking lol.. t80u has a much better turret with contact 5 era all over it and the Hull and sides... The ufp is barely stronger than the t72b tanks it's probably weaker since it has no era
@@baka-shinji7124it has a long ass reload, no thermals, no full hunter killer capabilities and no ERA. It is balanced. You are probably only saying this because it’s Russian.
It has a 10s reload so strongest apfsds in the game at 10.0 is only fair Oh and you can pen the drivers port and LFP with 105mm apfsds so it should really be 9.3
Russian players: Glass Cannon! Literally has better armor than any tank at the 10.0-10.3 BR People were calling me crazy when I said it is as survivable as a T80U but they still think it’s going to be 10.0-10.3. The most comparable tank, the Swedish T80U, is 11.0.
@@guindle9291and you, a smarty ass, still don't talk about how this game works: bugs of damage model(which work for and against everyone), damage The only thing you(as a modern bug thunder player) see is penetration. Indeed, why care about hidden stats.
its gonna be at least moved to 10.7 never than less its an Glasscannon IDK why people call it op one single hit and its gonna be disabled as Stephen Hawking and one good hit could as good 'ol russian tank joke says "make it a space program"
Should be higher, like 11.3 at least. Doesn't matter if it's a glass cannon, it can pen anything in the game and do enough damage to one shot anything it sees. It's not OP it's just stupid
@@petarbozinovski6606 it’s got armor on par with the 10.7 T-90A. The Obj 292 is meant to be a glass cannon, that’s why it was added, so it should be minimum 11.0 but more fairly 11.3
Glasscanon without ability to aim quick and without right on error due to reload. I think Obama must get 3 seconds reload to successfully fight this tonk. Since it's hard to fight with a beer bottle in one hand and something else yet not mouse in the other hand. Save Amêriqua! 3 seconds reload!
We all know sure as shit this thing is going to eat rounds to it’s ammo as if it actually has blowout panels and properly protected ammo and it’ll be balanced because it’s there and gijan wouldn’t make anything unbalanced
Great armour great gun and good mobility.. this tank is gunna be a beast… it can literally pen top tier tanks in the front at 1k meters… only draw backs is ammo I’m back of turret and reload…
Since they changed how the events are going to work now, can you get the points from air rb if the the price is ground vehicle? Or am I stuck to playing ground rb for the rest of the event...
If I´m in a 9.0-10.0 vehicle, I rather fight this than a T72B. I looked at all tanks between 9.0 an 10.0, the only ones that can´t be reliably penned by the 125mm 3BM42 (@500m) in the hull and the turret are the T72s and ZTZ96s (and even there only the turrets are partially safe). If you drive anything else, you would get pemetrated anyways, only that the Obj 292 has a much longer reload, no smoke launchers and equal to partially less protection
@@newbluewolf3 you can get penned by any 9.0-9.7 vehicle too, and that doesn't change the fact that thing with almost 700m of pen, that can literally pen the turret cheeks of Abrams and leo2a4(something that any tanks except for this one cant)will be facing 9.0-9.7 tanks and should be at least 11.0 or 10.7, it just doesn't change the fact that would be OP at 10.0 like the 2S38 in 10.0 or VIDAR at 8.0
@@ragnarokinfall8565 3BM42 can pen the 2A4 and Abrams turret, only barely the IPM1/M1A1 turret, but still. Will the 292 do it more consistently, especially at range? Definitely. But even at 10.3 the T80B would be massively better, with faster fire rate, thermals, smoke screen and ERA against ATGMs, the only downside being that you don’t penetrate maybe 5% of the shots you would have penetrated with the 292.
@@newbluewolf3 bruh that only happens at really really close range and exactly at some weird angle, the ability to kill everything even if they are hull down, is quiet OP, the lack of thermals doesn't make it worse, thermals sure help but doesn't make a tank worse or better, you only have to see vehicles like VIDAR or Object 120 to see what would happen with the object 292 in 10.0, for people like you is why those OP still there fucking the BR below them
@@ragnarokinfall8565 directly from the front at 500m is neither a strange angle nor extremely close range. And being able to kill everything even hull down is kinda the theme at 8.0 to 11.0 (with a few exceptions), not a unique ability of the 292. You are the first on in probably 5 years that I see complaining about the Obj 120. Since launch it even moved down in BR and I still rarely see it on the battlefield. The VIDAR was/is op because it takes a strong concept and pumps it up to eleven with an autoloader, thermals and Laser Rangefinder on a BR where noone else has these features.
This feels like German prototypes. Just get the general outline of the vehicle, and if they don't like it then they don't finish the entire thing Russians seem to usually finish their entire prototype, but this one doesn't seem to be the case
The lovely toxic community will cry it to 12.7 die to it’s pen. 2 days ago a player asked in the match why leopard 2 a7 doesn’t have the best pen round? I said it has a 650mm pen and you don’t need more than 550 if you know where to shoot. Response was: But the 292 pens more. My response: 120mm vs 152mm apfsds barely pens more than a leo 2a7 There were no response after this but I assume wanted to say “germany suffers”
It takes .6 seconds for that shell to hit a target at 1000m
Yea the round speed is almost 2000m/s so it makes sense
Why after reading this I imagine heavy weapons guy from TF2 saying it?
@@ALGIEMOSS She weighs 2000kg and fires custom tooled 152mm APFSDS rounds at 6 rounds a minute
u serious cause I shot the mountain that was 3500m away and it took 4 seconds
@@weegeepootis430 Just divide 1000m by the APFSDS's muzzle velocity, and you get 600, which means 0.6 seconds
at 2:05 it overpens the Leopard 2A4 turret going the long way and hits the ground behind it
On the test fires the thing absolutely decimated T-72 insides without even penetrating in(first shot, the crew wasn't familiar with the gun). All of it's insides were thrown out of their spots like radios, loading mechanism, commander sights, etc. So overpenning like this is a lucky thing for the crew
152mm Russian rail gun at 10.0, no coaxial MG and ammo in the back of the turret.
This Thing feel similar to a certain russian TD at 7.7 with very very long gun but with some survival abilities.
Obj 120 but Mbt, I guess
Object 120
truth glass cannon
500mm of pen at 10.0 Aw hell naw
It is actually 700mm flat pen and 400mm on 60 dergees@@manager7186
Nawwwwww
@@manager7186 700mm not 500
Love how a Soviet prototype with a massive railgun plus relative ammo has 13 secs of autoloader fill, meanwhile Type 90/10 still are on a suicide watch for how slow are to reload...
What? They literally have a 4 second autoloader. How tf are they reloading slowly??
@@alexmaximus9134 maybe i said it wrong, try again.
This tank will refill the autoloader in 13 sec per round (with massive two-piece rounds). Meanwhile Type 90/10 take ages to do the same thing with single piece ammo (the autoloader refill was once buffed, then quickly removed).
It's not the "fire rate".
@@Sh-epard Oh, now i get it. Idk the autoloader replenishment speed for those tanks. Not even for the russian MBTs, as i don't take that many shells anyway.
Yes they hate Japan and will do everything in their power to keep Russia in the top winrate
@@alexmaximus9134 it's relative faster on T-serie tanks than any other autoloaded or two-piece ammo western tank. Even the Challenger 1 and 2 are slower on refill their first stage ammo...but what i'm saying, of course they are. Those two tanks are British, Gaijin hates British tanks.
Well, there go my soul, hydration and sleep right out the window on february 1st.
Warthunder makes your thirsty?
Well, when you sit for 9 hours straight, grinding away, then yeah.
Its not that hard unless your that bad at the game, averaging 1000 points a game with the average 10 min game you only need max 4 hours per day and this is worst case scenario. Unless you want to make it tradeable then maybe but I dont see why youd want to
@@burneracc2567 How does it take you 9 hours, I'm guessing for a single mark of distinction. It was a little less during the TOG event but it took me 3-4 hours to achieve 35k mission score playing at 6.3.
@@The_War_Pug yeah, it's not that hard but I like to throw in a few air and naval battles if I get frustrated with ground, and those can last full 24 minutes.
So basically trades ERA for a juicy 152mm and good pen, has slightly worse armour then a t-80, and a pretty bad long reload, I would say it’s best used as a sniper or support honestly, the onion survival chart of do not be hit should basically be drilled into your head when you play this I guess
Well, preferably you don't even want to be spotted in the first place
That’s why you use its top speed to get to a good flank.
Open maps is where this thing will stomp. You shouldn’t take this thing out in city maps at all unless you don’t have any other vehicle.
I would say, I am primarily a sniper player, I don’t like brawls unless I know I have the advantage, so seeing this tank play into all of my strengths is making me salivate lmao.
@@GuardianOne24IMAGINE THIS THING ON PRADESH AOOGHHHJTM..
..
Obj262 Best use i think as medium range sniping
Long range won't be good since it has no thermal, you can't see shit if it's heavy foliage map
In BR 10.0 sprut is better sniper with 3BM60 and thermal
it has better armor than a t80
Having bushes on the front is a war crime
Live IS-2 reverse trick Reaction :
Ironic saying that if you got the Palestine flag
@@balthasargelt4075 why? because war crimes is being committed at us 24/7?more than 20k civilians dead by the z1onists bombs
israfil right?@@balthasargelt4075
@@balthasargelt4075 quit bringing politics and complain about the obvious rus bias
I still feel weird for an event being called call of dragon and its a USSR vehicle unless I'm missing something here
leave it to gaijin to make everything a russian premium XD
Always a good time when you get a russian vehicle motage involving hell march (3)
It’s HM2 not 3.
@@Angstbringer18B, correct!
Always a good time when NATO fanboii thinks it's fun, amusing, and representative
I will say that with nearly 660mm of pen at 1000m you can really shoot anywhere on the hull and kill at and above it's BR.
With the strv122 and t80bvm you cant
@@jvanlaarhoven2402 you can, it can pen Strv 122/leo 2a7
@@Optimusprime56241 didn't tested but probably cheek's are immune
@@cactuslietuvait can pen the M1A1 HC’s turret cheeks, so it likely can pen the Strv 122+’s
@@Iden_in_the_Rain it does not pen if you shoot it from the front, only if you go from the side to reduce the angle
Ah yes, replenishing the autoloader with 152mm shells with only 2 crew, none of which are a dedicated loader, faster than a Challenger 1/2 with a dedicated loader. Definitely no Russian bias here.
Shhhh 😊😊
cry more
if you anger the snail it might get a reload buff too
Every single time a russian tank gets added you always cry, hows that victim complex going for you? If russia is so overpowered then just play that nation.
Challenger 2 sucks
HE also have nice velocity
I’m glad WT really moved away from ww2 stuff. So when giga clown grind events come, I’m not missing out.
@@SP-sy5nqhell nah.
who cares about HE if you have the strongest shell in the game?
@@christian9125abdcause HE is still stronger
@@irirjhrhr4645in very rare cases
Object 292 has the same UFP layout with T-80U, but it has modified turret of T-80BV.
It's a T-80BV upper front plate, which has the same layout as T-80U. The T-80B"V" upgrade in game is just a T-80B with ERA, not an actual T-80BV
@@supersarge24 T-80BV in game is T-80B 1978 + V standing for Kontakt-1 ERA, so it has the name T-80BV. Late T-80B 1984 and early T-80U 1986 have same UFP layout. T-80BV is upgraded from 2 versions of T-80B, mod 1978 and mod 1984 with Kontakt-1 ERA.
@@supersarge24
T-80B / Object 219R (1978): This model had a new turret with improved composite armor, laser rangefinder, new fire-control system, new autoloader and missile launcher system capable of firing 9M112-1 Kobra antitank guided missile through the gun barrel.[63] An improved, 1,100 hp, engine was added in 1980, a new gun in 1982. A night sight TPNZ-49 in active mode reached 1,300 m and a passive - 850 m.[65]
T-80BV (1985): T-80BV (model 1985) is a T-80B upgraded with Kontakt-1 ERA on turret and hull. Smoke discharges are re-positioned to make a room on the turret for ERA. There is a new gun 2A46M-1 with 9K112 Kobra system capable of firing improved 9M112M Kobra ATGM through gun barrel.
T-80BV also introduced a new 5 part armor array on the hull unlike the old 3 part T-80B. T-80B's were upgraded with applique armor 30mm high hardness steel plate to increase its protection to the same level.
@@supersarge24 it actually T-80U, they used it as base in actual tank
@@duykhanh2k1321 It's a T-80BV. Both the uparmored T-80B and the one with K1 ERA were referred to as T-80BV, generally the ERA protected one is referred to as T-80B(V) to avoid confusion.
i vow to only use HE on this funny lil guy
Gaijin has finally added the Rhino tank from Red Alert 2 i see
yup this is definitely 10.0 and will stay that way for around 6 months to a year before they change it, but of course the hstvl keeps getting nerfed into the ground
Clearly Balanced 👍
Britain Mains are fucked because our best round (L27A1) can't do shit.
Mister whine. You as a typical schoolboy can be mislead by a number. Like there's no hidden(small font) text IRL. And like in 10 years of Release Beta Test of Bug Tuhunder there's no hidden stats.
like damage.
Gaijin seems to think that all Soviet era prototype tanks that never saw service are somehow all giga wunderwaffe tanks with uber guns that can overpen a MBT decades newer than it while being as fast as an F1 car and can survive a FAB-5000 dropped directly down its drivers hatch
there are many prototype tanks in other nations too
It's all true. They weren't made so the west would think that they stand a chance komrad)))))))))))))))))))))
@@sxbcdbfxs7069how come they never add those?
@@sxbcdbfxs7069 1. Other nation have fewer prototypes in-game
2. Those prototypes have less power than USSR prototype + service tank have more power than own prototype
gaijin just adds every single russian prototype they hear about, even if they never made it past concept blueprints it still gets added into the game at an insanely low br, all "object ____" NEVER SAW COMBAT ONCE, MOST WHERE NEVER EVEN BUILT BUT GAIJIN IS LIKE "HM YES WE ADD", AND.... ironically... they removed 3 german tanks from the game "cuz they never saw combat" like dude i wanted to play a tiger 2 with a 105mm gun and then they 1984'ed it out of the game just to re-add it later as a russian premium in a new skin, good armor, good gun SAME THING.
Meanwhile:
"Shell shatterd"
"Ricochet"
"Hit"
"Overpen"
"The target hasn't been take any damage!"
the Ultimate Big Brother of Object-120.
Gaijin sees russias lower winrate:Gaijin "yeah we have to fix it"
by lower win rates you mean 70%?
they quite literally downtiered a kv-1 variant (premium) cuz it had like a 60% win rate and was "too underpowered"
Soviet Armata. Makes you think what kind of tanks Soviet Union would have today if it didn't collapse.
No more aiming for the weakspots with this one 😎
it can shoot you anywhere, you can't
and gaijin is insane enough to put it at 10.0, not even 11.3
That ready rack refill is way too fast, also I see it has magical t-80 spalling protection
why I would surprise
people keep say "glass cannon" while I caught a fact being "T-80"
The true glass cannon is called Leopard 1A5@@SRDPS2
I would like to point out it is a t80 with a great gun at the same tier as the first M1 abrams cause gaijin
cope
A well-balanced Soviet MBT
I can only see it useful at long-distance sniping.
At CQC, a single mistake can get you killed.
Single miss and you are screwed,especially having the Abrams/Merkava buffed Reload.
Same situation with T-90M.
You miss,no going back.
It is safe to say people should not overestimate the tank.
bruh 90% is camping in ground battle..
@user-yq6nd7zk4r At least they won't have difficulties aiming and penetrating at longer distances.
If you mean camping as in sitting in one position all game long,at top tier, it's not much going to work.
But as in sitting around the corner waiting is more of a stand off who's patience will run out or have someone flank you.
Personally, I'll use the 292 like a moving sniper,like in Stalingrad, where sitting too long in one position can get you killed.
without thermals good luck sniping
@cactuslietuva Luck is barely needed for sniping,skill on the other hand is.
Thermals just aid in identifying the enemy vehicle easier,whitout it would be difficult but not impossible.
I still see it as a well-balanced MBT
Well balanced at 11.0-11.7 maybe, not at 10.0.
I think the cannon of objects 292 can penetrate all tank I mean in front
if it can't nobody can.
Yet another broken ass Soviet tank for wallet warriors that will dominate every single battle it's on
It's shit
It has no fucking armor lmfao, quit coping.
@@codenamecrusade1083 it literally has a T80 Hull how dare you even say "no armor" for this vehicle at its br
this is gonna be yet another overpowered Russian event vehicle that's gonna cost $500 in the future, I'm calling it.
Probably way more than $500 just because of how ludicrous the amount of points to convert the coupon to sellable is. There won't be enough of them floating around on the marketplace. If the tank turns out to be even remotely desirable I bet we see a new record high for vehicle cost.
Free premium time baby
doubt it will cost that much anytime in the near future. also the chance of it getting moved up. likely to 10.7 if I were to make a guess.
@@CobraDBlade tbh, i will grind it to sell, although it would fit my 10.0 nicely, but, i could do so much more with the GC from it
10 second reload in 10.0 br with 10 kph reverse. Tank to cyber"bushes", aggressive gameplay will be hard.
Did you forget it has great armor for 10.0? Only two tanks can pen its ufp at its br. It will do absolutely fine in a duel at any range with a half decent player. It may struggle a bit against multiple tanks but those tanks still have to hit relatively smal weakspots
@@casematecardinal and its breach area is much stronger compared to other ussr tanks, and it cant be ammoracked from the front lowerplate as its carusel sits higher.
@@casematecardinal о, а вы хотите всех в силует пробивать?)
Плачь дальше
Lower BR than the M1 abrams,
GODDAMN F*CKING JOKE.
Better armor, gun, and lineup.
The abrams for being a higher br gets better gun handleing and mobility double the reload(given you have an aced crew and havent lost your loader) and gen 1 thermals which really dont make thay much difference. Oh and a machinegun. The abrams definitely has advantages but in a duel its fucked most of the time
hahah cope your tanks are worse
Jokes aside, while the Object 292 does deserve to be around 10.0 (maybe 10.3), in its current state, the Abrams is really underpowered due to how Gaijin implemented its composites (chobham should be a lot more effective than it is now).
Honestly, Gaijin should’ve put the Object 292 in the game at 11.3 or 11.7 with an ahistorical “it got ERA” setup (as if it was ever deployed the tank would’ve basically just been a T-80BV with a 152mm gun)
@@AUsernameWeShallMarchToKievit’s got 10.7 armor when looking at only the Russians and 11.7 armor if you look at minor nations, a 12.3-12.7 round, gun handling on par with anything up to 10.7 in the Russian tree, better mobility than anything in the Russian T-72 line other than the 11.3 T-72B3. The thing should be minimum 11.0-11.3.
@@casematecardinal i honestly feel like the abrams should be moved down to 10.0, it has a overall better lineup there. The germans too get a budget leo 2 with a 105 at 10.0, i dont see why the abrams is much higher. Lastly, it wont be seeing 11.3 matchmaker. Dont get me wrong, i do well in the abrams but it really suffers in uptiers with only m774
Music from red alert fits perfectly
@ Zenturion7 Will you make a video comparing the M1 Abrams old engine sound and new one? They just updated it and it should be quieter. o7
Object 120 after it took a fist full of bath salts
Gaijin not beating the Russian bias allegations with this one!!! 🗣🗣🗣🔥🔥🔥
Yup I can already tell this is gonna be so balanced it's gonna go up in br😂
T-72AV's New friends (2 death user)
*3 death user, dont forget the bmb2m or 2s38
me who have no payment but grind this :
(definitely, I will be 1 death leaver for short period to test out for being fed up)
Great, just when work gets busy.
I just see a big big big gun thats like to be blacked out and not usable because it soaks up shrapnel like my ex soaks up *ocks.
With that much mm of pen at this BR it's most likely dominating this tier. Nearly 660mm of pen is what u get in Leo A7V's or PSO's at 11.7
another "my brain is sleeping during winters, hybernates" guy. What about damage? And bugs this thing is going to be more afraid of simply because it shoots rarer? Oh you didn't think about it, who'd think. And what about damage? Another thing you assume instead of being sceptical after all "presents" by snail.
@@worldoftancraft What the actual fuck are you talking about, you speak complete nosense. Bet you‘re fun at partys
Pretty sure this think will do best in Red Desert map.
No smoke grenades either
This is basically a 10.0 conqueror, but for Russia
Finally I Can kills leos and strv from front armor lol, I can shoot lower plate but it's only damaged the engine and not kill the crew (leo A7 and strv)
A bit overkill for the 10.0 against vehicles. Even a 125 can pen everything.
True, 125mm already works nicely.
HE
might be fun to play, but with that reload brawling really is out of question
oh fuck yeah we got the Hell March 2!
This thing's gonna be moved up to 11.3/11.7 a patch or two after it comes out.
Well its russia so give it 9 months. If it were Chinese, give it 7. If it were sweedish 6. Same if it were german. 3 months for Israeli or Japanese. 2 months if it were American or British and a month if it were french or Italian
@@casematecardinalweek before launch if it was british 😂 the Tog was going to be 4.7
@masonicrat the tog at 4.7 would have been a menace, but yeah
@@casematecardinaldear witnesses of AMÊRIQUA ZUFFERZ.
Could you tell me how it happened that Russia that never sees nerfs" had being annihilated by NATO spam of G-91 and FB-4(naval sabre) with NORDs and BULLPUPs for 3.5 years before Bias Russia have seen something alike? Like any of AGMs?
Or you're going to say "zis iz zi different!"?
@@masonicrat The difference is the tog is slow as fuck, a large target for air and ground vehicles and once you get the smoke cannon with the additional, non-functional MG blocks on either side, you would have a massive weak spot. The 292 has;
A small silhouette, armour that isn't realistic, a cannon with fuck off penetration, better than any tank in the game, and decent mobility (unlike the TOG). ERA with Biased values. And will be put at a BR where everything will die to it and it will be killable only in the common weak spots at the front. (driver hatch, lower glacis)
It's fundamentally a better sniping tank than the tanks intended for sniping (The Challenger 2s) because its penetration is far better than the L27 round, the same round that should have 700mm of pen (especially to make up for the piss poor armour)
Armoured Obj 120
"A weapon to surpass Metal Gear"
I cant wait to make all the premium users cry lmfao.
I honestly can’t tell if this thing gonna be op or situational but still leaning towards the latter. Imo this thing should be a bit higher in br, maybe 10.7 or 11.0 ?
10.3 max
@@zer0asanumber have you looked at its armor? its pretty stong. i mean its more survivable than the turms-t, mainly because of its high hardness armour, much stronger breach and the fact that it cant be ammoracked from the front lowerplate(ammo sits higher) its gotta be 11.0 minimum. its much more survivable than lelercs, arietes, type 10s, leo 2a5/6 and merkavas and it has the best round in the game.
@@konna6130 lol have you ever heard of the t72b 1989??? That thing has tge best armour at 10.0 with contact 5 era and still it's easy to kill. Just aim at the lfp driver hatch or breech and easy kill.
Doesn't matter what you say its still a typical soviet rank with crap post pen survivability. Gun is complete overkill and unnecessary. Nothing this 152mm apfsds can do at 10.0 that 3mb42 can't do
If you struggle to kill soviet tanks it's a big skill issue sorry. Get gud at aiming...
Btw I can tell you never played top tier soviet mbs how the is the obj 292 more survivable than lea 2a6????
@@zer0asanumber 292 has better armor than t80u, lfp isnt a ammorack on it and the breach is much thicker and fup is stronger than the 72s.
@@konna6130 not true lol and even if it was, it would not be any harder to kill than a t64B
You must be joking lol.. t80u has a much better turret with contact 5 era all over it and the Hull and sides...
The ufp is barely stronger than the t72b tanks it's probably weaker since it has no era
The Red Alert 2 music truly is fitting.
Bias incarnate
Thumper+cattb, when
Best meta tank spotted
Incoming glass cannon us tank lmfao
BR 13.0 lol
(I mean really, it's full combat armor *PROTOTYPE* )
@@SRDPS2 ytp lolpenn gun vs *paper* armor tanks
Who will win 🤣
@@mamarussellthepie3995 paper armor
Fking no spall cuz too light XD
@02suraditpengsaeng41 lol right? 😆 🫠💀
There are more lightly armored mbts at 11.7 with similar or worse pen.
Why is this thing being put at 10.0
Worse reload, no MG, no hunter-killer and no thermals. That being said, the railgun is more than worth it, I expect it to be moved up to 10.7 or 11.0
@@KekusMagnus fully expecting 10.7 or 11.0 also. Fear this has potential to be a wish version of the 279 which was under BR'd for waay too long.
Every MBT at 11.7 has worse pen with sabot, it's the highest penning dart in the game. Absolutely insane BR placement
@@baka-shinji7124it has a long ass reload, no thermals, no full hunter killer capabilities and no ERA. It is balanced. You are probably only saying this because it’s Russian.
@@baka-shinji7124another mister Penetration. Have you heard about damage, mister raw damage? No?
Its like the event tank is worth grinding
Trust me the first time I heard that it didn't had Era
But now
I am 'Its good without era'
New russian bias?
No
It has a 10s reload so strongest apfsds in the game at 10.0 is only fair
Oh and you can pen the drivers port and LFP with 105mm apfsds so it should really be 9.3
@@hulilupteri.i smell a Russian main
@@Das_Fieselhave you ever taken an IQ test
@@Das_Fiesel He's right tho, it has too many weaknesses to be anywhere above uhh idk, 11.0? I guess 10.0 is a bit unfair. 10.3 seems more fair imo
I think it will the best sniper in the game, I hope it get the normal research version
there wasn't normal version. this is the only prototype version
It has custom 152mm sounds not a a mod actually
There won't be a tech tree version, this was a prototype gun.
@@cactuslietuva its not the only prototype, there is also the Object 195
Most balanced Russian tanks in Russian games
Russian players: Glass Cannon!
Literally has better armor than any tank at the 10.0-10.3 BR
People were calling me crazy when I said it is as survivable as a T80U but they still think it’s going to be 10.0-10.3. The most comparable tank, the Swedish T80U, is 11.0.
@@Phapchamp it still has the best armor at 10.0 or 10.3.
also m829a1 isn't until 11.0 anyway.
@@guindle9291and you, a smarty ass, still don't talk about how this game works: bugs of damage model(which work for and against everyone), damage
The only thing you(as a modern bug thunder player) see is penetration. Indeed, why care about hidden stats.
the object 279 has bette armor and it is 9.0
@@Phapchamp the T-80b is already a fucking glas tank...
@@christian9125abd "the object 279 has bette armor and it is 9.0" lol 279 is easily penned by 400mm pen heat, while 292 is not.
at least it doesnt have coax machine gun to help it defend against spaag or take out tracks when reloading...
не, ну военные инженеры натянули инженеров нато 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
for a test vehicle this is cool
Premium destroyer
its gonna be at least moved to 10.7 never than less its an Glasscannon
IDK why people call it op
one single hit and its gonna be disabled as Stephen Hawking and one good hit could as good 'ol russian tank joke says "make it a space program"
Should be higher, like 11.3 at least. Doesn't matter if it's a glass cannon, it can pen anything in the game and do enough damage to one shot anything it sees. It's not OP it's just stupid
@@NGenuity280 Stupid don't mean OP btw like M109 HE is stupid but skill
but yeah, 10.0 is not right (except for 2 000 Gcoin)
It’s not a glass cannon if it’s got armor better than 10.7 tanks, it should be 11.3
It has worse armor than the t72b 1989 thats 10.0@@Iden_in_the_Rain
@@petarbozinovski6606 it’s got armor on par with the 10.7 T-90A. The Obj 292 is meant to be a glass cannon, that’s why it was added, so it should be minimum 11.0 but more fairly 11.3
Oh hell yeah
I dig it, though it feels like it should be 10.3~7 glasscannon maxxing
Glasscanon without ability to aim quick and without right on error due to reload. I think Obama must get 3 seconds reload to successfully fight this tonk. Since it's hard to fight with a beer bottle in one hand and something else yet not mouse in the other hand. Save Amêriqua! 3 seconds reload!
I had an aneurysm reading this
Just buy Object-120 lol
@@Ry-bo9hi because you play while having a bottle of beer in your left hand???
@@worldoftancraft where does this classcannon thing come from. its better armored than the turms-t.
Ok Gaijin, where M1 Thumper then?
Maybe it should be 10.7, it seems a bit too good for 10.0. But either way, it seems annoyingly impractical
Br would be justified if the chassie was B varient but BV chassie and the strongest apdsfs at 10.0 is criminal
T-80U chassis not T-80BV chassis.
@@duykhanh2k1321 BV and early U had same hull armor.
@@christians.597 T-80B 1984 and early T-80U (maybe 1986) had same UFP layout. T-80BV (1972, 1986) with V standing for having Kontakt-1 ERA.
@@duykhanh2k1321 no, T-80U hull array was identical to new T-80BV: 50-35-50-35-50
The way the driver sits.
Most spacious russian MBT
My back hurts watching this
Commieboo : "no such thing as comfort is matter of tank"
Very cool! Pure definition of a glass cannon.
We all know sure as shit this thing is going to eat rounds to it’s ammo as if it actually has blowout panels and properly protected ammo and it’ll be balanced because it’s there and gijan wouldn’t make anything unbalanced
no
Guess I sold my WT account in good time....
Idk why people complain it being 10.0... It's fine in that br
0:31 Imagine literally almost having top tier armor profile
on 10.0 while unsatisfactory LOSAT exist
Great armour great gun and good mobility.. this tank is gunna be a beast… it can literally pen top tier tanks in the front at 1k meters… only draw backs is ammo I’m back of turret and reload…
@@SRDPS2This thing does not have top tier armor, it has very similar armor performance to the T-64B with worse turret armor.
No it isn’t
@@skyguard155yeah the t72b 89 has better armor and reload
"gaijin can we have T-80 at 10.0?"
"No player we have T-80 at 10.0"
T-80 at 10.0:
A there are already 3 t72's at 10.0, B this is not a t72 its a T80 lol
what
if thats not the perfect soundtrack for it what elso could be xD
Since they changed how the events are going to work now, can you get the points from air rb if the the price is ground vehicle?
Or am I stuck to playing ground rb for the rest of the event...
You are stuck
it only counts grb
@@nhatlehong8803another nerf of sim battles
@nhatlehong8803 you can play arcade too XD
@@duitk if you want to get only a third of the rewards then sure, grind away! (arcade has a 1/3 modifier on points and rp)
watch this thing make 10.0 unplayable for a week
yep. For those who will end up with soviets in their team. 1 death = quit
I'm interested will it work the same way as it works on British tanks , since explosive part of shell stored in turret not in carousel
I want it but I don't have the time to grind it :(
Abd don't even think about buying it the 750k ponits is gonna make sure it's price is gonna be 50gjn
@@laifamohammed3571more like 2 or 3 times that...
@@laifamohammed3571I think, it will be about 80-90, too much points to grind for sale
Its 8k ge @@laifamohammed3571
Не слушай их, все что тебе надо это купить сами задачи которые не успеешь выполнить, это в любом случае будет дешевле
Gaijin trying not to add busted russian vehicles to the game challenge. Impossible.
"busted" 😂😂😂🤣🤣💀🤣🤣💀😂😂
realllllllll
Cry about it
RIP 10.0 lmao
I heard it’s supposed to have gen 1 thermals
Cant wait to see this in wtm😅😅
Okay... now this is epix
Type 10 should get hull traverse this level as well
type 10 should get its 3.5 second reload and maybe even the 2 second panic fire setting.
@@konna6130 Nah, that would be overpower, 4 sec is very good
@@dumbot0713 but it has 3.5 irl
Do a video where u test how much light tanks it can pen in one shot
no way its 10.0
It's quite mediocre even for 10.0, and they didn't gave shell that's all tank designed around/
Poor's 9.0-9.7 vehicles when that thing gets a downtier, and we cannot get M829A3, is almost like gaijin is trying to prove their russian bais
If I´m in a 9.0-10.0 vehicle, I rather fight this than a T72B. I looked at all tanks between 9.0 an 10.0, the only ones that can´t be reliably penned by the 125mm 3BM42 (@500m) in the hull and the turret are the T72s and ZTZ96s (and even there only the turrets are partially safe). If you drive anything else, you would get pemetrated anyways, only that the Obj 292 has a much longer reload, no smoke launchers and equal to partially less protection
@@newbluewolf3 you can get penned by any 9.0-9.7 vehicle too, and that doesn't change the fact that thing with almost 700m of pen, that can literally pen the turret cheeks of Abrams and leo2a4(something that any tanks except for this one cant)will be facing 9.0-9.7 tanks and should be at least 11.0 or 10.7, it just doesn't change the fact that would be OP at 10.0 like the 2S38 in 10.0 or VIDAR at 8.0
@@ragnarokinfall8565 3BM42 can pen the 2A4 and Abrams turret, only barely the IPM1/M1A1 turret, but still. Will the 292 do it more consistently, especially at range? Definitely. But even at 10.3 the T80B would be massively better, with faster fire rate, thermals, smoke screen and ERA against ATGMs, the only downside being that you don’t penetrate maybe 5% of the shots you would have penetrated with the 292.
@@newbluewolf3 bruh that only happens at really really close range and exactly at some weird angle, the ability to kill everything even if they are hull down, is quiet OP, the lack of thermals doesn't make it worse, thermals sure help but doesn't make a tank worse or better, you only have to see vehicles like VIDAR or Object 120 to see what would happen with the object 292 in 10.0, for people like you is why those OP still there fucking the BR below them
@@ragnarokinfall8565 directly from the front at 500m is neither a strange angle nor extremely close range. And being able to kill everything even hull down is kinda the theme at 8.0 to 11.0 (with a few exceptions), not a unique ability of the 292. You are the first on in probably 5 years that I see complaining about the Obj 120. Since launch it even moved down in BR and I still rarely see it on the battlefield. The VIDAR was/is op because it takes a strong concept and pumps it up to eleven with an autoloader, thermals and Laser Rangefinder on a BR where noone else has these features.
This feels like German prototypes. Just get the general outline of the vehicle, and if they don't like it then they don't finish the entire thing
Russians seem to usually finish their entire prototype, but this one doesn't seem to be the case
Object 292 was tested in the erlay 1990, but with the collapse of Soviet + no more money, so Object 292 project was stopped.
Should be 10.7 at least imo
modern KV-2
Soooooo... Strv 2000 when?
The tank hasn't even gotten out yet and the NATO cattle are already starting to cry like children. Great job snail.
u forgot to mention the close to mach 6 muzzle velocity. Barely need to lead against a fast moving object.
The lovely toxic community will cry it to 12.7 die to it’s pen.
2 days ago a player asked in the match why leopard 2 a7 doesn’t have the best pen round?
I said it has a 650mm pen and you don’t need more than 550 if you know where to shoot.
Response was:
But the 292 pens more.
My response:
120mm vs 152mm apfsds barely pens more than a leo 2a7
There were no response after this but I assume wanted to say “germany suffers”
Gajin devs were drunk on vodka when they decided to put this in 10.0
Definetly not russian bias.
혹시 화면 상단에 있는 숫자로 이류어진 방향 눈금들을 보이게 하려면 어디서 설정하나요?