Intel i7-8700K vs i7-8086K - CPU Comparison Benchmarks

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 103

  • @muzhaq5
    @muzhaq5 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Comprehensive and thorough review as always. Glad to find your channel. Keep it up.

  • @kasimirdenhertog3516
    @kasimirdenhertog3516 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I’ve had both. The 8086K is indeed not much faster under load, but it is noticeably snappier in light use (ie. browsing, emailing, word processing). Thought this was worth noting!

    • @smiped1569
      @smiped1569 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is this with overclock or without?

    • @kasimirdenhertog3516
      @kasimirdenhertog3516 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@smiped1569 bone stock

    • @smiped1569
      @smiped1569 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh wow. Thanks for answering a one year old comment.

    • @kasimirdenhertog3516
      @kasimirdenhertog3516 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@smiped1569 no problem 🙂 The boost for one core is 300MHz higher than the 8700K, which I think is what makes the difference. When you start a simple app, like mail or Word, it starts out with one core, then adds one or more cores. In this first instance, the 8086K hits 5GHz and then lowers the clocks when adding cores, at which point it behaves identical to the 8700K, but then it's almost done already. It's this initial response that gives the 8086K a smidge more snapiness.

  • @joshmo24
    @joshmo24 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great video man. Keep up the good work.

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cheers Josh!

    • @joshmo24
      @joshmo24 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JarrodsTech for your 8700k, did you sync all cores at 5ghz? Also what is your avx offset at? Thanks!

  • @FirestormTM2008
    @FirestormTM2008 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Should've tested Grand Theft Auto V since that game is CPU-intensive. Either way, great video!

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks! I don't like testing that one anymore due to a lack of built in setting presets.😰

  • @josephhojilla2154
    @josephhojilla2154 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very informative thanks man

  • @ryantoomey611
    @ryantoomey611 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    8086k has a special nostalgia to it. You would think it was a 40-year old CPU.

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Maybe people will care more 40 years from now.

    • @masastankovic6849
      @masastankovic6849 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JarrodsTech i have 8086-2 :)

  • @Justin_collier
    @Justin_collier 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Even in 2024, i own this and it still runs great in most applications in win 11, i have no reason to upgrade! It will still run most games and do anything i throw its direction.

  • @bloomfield295
    @bloomfield295 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey man there is a direct die cooling tool for the 9700k/9900k which is made by der8uar, as the pcbs on the 9th Gen chips are taller, it is possible to cooler them directly with out the ihs, I would request u to cover it if possible.

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not something I can do with the 8086K in this instance as it was a borrowed review unit and sent back, could be interesting for other chips but at the same time not sure if I want to modify my own stuff, most people run them at stock so might be good to have them at stock for future comparisons.

    • @bloomfield295
      @bloomfield295 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JarrodsTech ok that's a fair enough argument, but the 9900k and the 9700k could be used direct die and that is the best case for cooling the Intel CPUs, was actually curious to know how low can one get in terms of temperatures when using a 9th Gen chips direct die. Anyway it seems it's not your cup of tea, good luck with the upcoming videos.

  • @Mobiltelekomnet
    @Mobiltelekomnet 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another great video👍

  • @diabl834
    @diabl834 5 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    *so this cpu is no that special... just buy 8700k XD*

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah, more for those that want an Intel collectors item than best performance for the dollar.

    • @diabl834
      @diabl834 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JarrodsTech i have a question out of subject-is it still worth it to buy a system with 4790k cpu? i know its not the latest and greatest but its very cheap 180 dollars for 4790k 16gb ram z97 and 240ssd just need some decent gpu. Your opinion?

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I've never tested one myself, but that CPU still has some good value second hand so I can only assume that it's still doing a pretty decent job these days.

    • @TechWithSean
      @TechWithSean 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      DIABLØ - a 4790k will still average over 60fps on ultra in AC Odyssey and that’s one of the most CPU heavy games out right now ✌️ that’s not a bad deal especially if it comes with a cooler, case and PSU or if you already have them.

    • @LocoMe4u
      @LocoMe4u 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Just got a used 8086k for 225$ lol have to tell everyone!

  • @HyrrokkinX
    @HyrrokkinX 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great comparison Jar.. thank you.. however i know that is your testing rig but please swap those cables ! LoL.. black is better, white will get dirty ;)

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! Which cables? I thought all my cables were black (not currently at home so can't check!)

    • @HyrrokkinX
      @HyrrokkinX 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JarrodsTech Jarrod LoL.. i mean good loking cables + combs ! you know them :)

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh I see, yeah it's something I'd like to do.

  • @femz4952
    @femz4952 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am thinking of building mini itx but I am concerned about not being able to upgrade past 32gb of ram, what typically requires more than 32 gigs and is it dumb to go more than 32.

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      32gb is fine for most applications, I'd only be looking at more if you do 4K video editing often or other workstation types of workloads like 3D design etc. For gaming 32gb should be plenty for years to come.

  • @pk9102
    @pk9102 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please try to review Alienware area 51 m as soon as possible (thermals, gameplay
    ..etc) If possible.planning to get one really soon.

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They should be getting it soon, just waiting for it to be available for me to borrow.

  • @bendh92
    @bendh92 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    FYI Cache is pronounced "cash" not "caysh". Great video though.

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It differs by region, here in Australia it's "caysh", because, well, there's no money in the CPU so why would it be cash 😅 forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1670154 literally at the top university in Australia in my computer science courses they told us to pronounce it how I do, so not sure what you want me to do here. They could have just been adding to the troll though 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @Tritania
    @Tritania 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have an 8086k and I ruined it months ago Overclocking it to 5.3GHz, wasn't stable, got it down to 5.1GHz stable on watercooling. but my whole system freezes up and has issues now. GG guys.

    • @GarbageTVoriginal
      @GarbageTVoriginal 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yea bc you didnt keep it stable lol common sense isnt so common

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      rip

    • @Tritania
      @Tritania 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JarrodsTech F to pay respects, thinking about buying another one sometime soon, I just hope I can resist OCing it again D:

    • @chadbrick67
      @chadbrick67 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well you are a fucking idiot then

  • @ronlifts
    @ronlifts 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Idk, 12 TRHEADS running at 5ghz is still a super solid cpu

  • @andrewdupuis1151
    @andrewdupuis1151 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    my acer comes with I7 8700 I don't get why is I7 8086k better

  • @pandurangpnaik2696
    @pandurangpnaik2696 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Next 8700k and 9700k plz and also include 8600k

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's on the to do list, I bought the 9700K and 8600K to do those comparisons, I just need more time as it takes many days of testing to get all of the data.

    • @pandurangpnaik2696
      @pandurangpnaik2696 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes that good .
      I know you have to do lot of hardwork to get the info by benchmarking , etc.
      Thanx for your great videos.
      Keep doing this great work .

  • @JayzBeerz
    @JayzBeerz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You can't even find an 8086k today unless you want to pay a ridiculous amount for it.

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I admit I haven't always been following the price, just figured it always cost a fair bit more.

    • @LocoMe4u
      @LocoMe4u 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol I just bought one used for 225$! X) hustle is real

  • @CuteLittleMiku
    @CuteLittleMiku 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How's that compared to 9700k though.

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not sure, I haven't had time to open the 9700K I bought months ago yet, I plan on comparing with the 8700K in future though.

  • @RobloxianX
    @RobloxianX 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Basically special edition before it was called special edition

  • @kartikpatil8462
    @kartikpatil8462 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should've gone with the lowest settings instead. CPU bottleneck would've given better differentiating results. But I guess who plays with lowest settings if you have one of the best CPUs for gaming at the moment

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes, that was my thought 😛 I wanted it to still be somewhat practical.

  • @nea3451
    @nea3451 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 5ghz, what is the voltage of the 8086k?

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not sure didn't run it at 5GHz so cannot say.

    • @chriss881000
      @chriss881000 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Had my running at 5ghz on 1.2v for some weeks just to try it. No problem

  • @gvi341984
    @gvi341984 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    225 on load? That's very impressive for a flagship

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah not too bad at all

  • @TallyHoTech
    @TallyHoTech 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thats a strange one. Whats the point of that. 8600K FTW

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Collectors item / for pro overclockers I guess 😎

  • @MRbeqa100
    @MRbeqa100 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    It seems like nothing more than making money just by "Limited Edition" on the box

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah basically, depends whether you care about it I guess.

  • @soapa4279
    @soapa4279 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anybody remotely considering an 8086K might as well just pay for a 9900K.

  • @sirbraxton9386
    @sirbraxton9386 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    can you do a 4.6GHz vs 5GHz test

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Unfortunately not, the 8086k was sent back weeks ago so I can't do anything further with it.

    • @sirbraxton9386
      @sirbraxton9386 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I mean you can do it with 8700k only. As we can see from the tests, 5 vs 5.1 is none of a difference. HCC i9 CPU's tend to reach their OC peak around 4.5/4.6 also, so I want to know if there's much of a difference in gaming scenarios.

  • @raghavgulati436
    @raghavgulati436 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can’t decide which laptop to buy i have a budget of 2k$

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      USD? Anything with an RTX 2060/GTX 1070 should be pretty good, as for more specifics I'd need to know what it's going to be used for, if you want thin/don't mind thicker etc.

    • @raghavgulati436
      @raghavgulati436 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jarrod'sTech i want a thin portable laptop. It’s mainly going to be used for gaming,editing and school work

    • @raghavgulati436
      @raghavgulati436 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jarrod'sTech please suggest me i am having a hard time to choose

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hmm for editing myself I use a Gigabyte Aero 15x, it's fairly thin, good specs but also amazing battery, one of the best I've tested. It also has an SD slot which the other thin gaming laptops are missing (MSI GS65/Razer Blade) and an ethernet port (Razer Blade does not have one). The Blade also has good battery, but costs a fair bit more. The GS65 is decent too, a cheaper Blade in my eyes, but for me the Aero has the best all round feature set.

    • @raghavgulati436
      @raghavgulati436 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jarrod'sTech it’s only little editing and mostly gaming.Is it the best choice or i should consider other

  • @HyakuPercent0509
    @HyakuPercent0509 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder which users that CPU is targeted for.

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Collectors / pro overclocks is my guess.

    • @chriss881000
      @chriss881000 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      For ppl that cares for lower temps and Higher oc. It does The job much better than 8700k

  • @mrchill1894
    @mrchill1894 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lol, dont think u can get 300fps in overwatch anymore

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I got 300 FPS in overwatch on a laptop yesterday at low and medium settings.

  • @tradewinds2008
    @tradewinds2008 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would go with the 8700K why spend extra for such minimal gain.. Thanks for the video.

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      No problem!

    • @chriss881000
      @chriss881000 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not minimal gain at all. If u care about temps and Higher oc.

  • @mubarakhsquare9130
    @mubarakhsquare9130 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great 👍

  • @LO20011024
    @LO20011024 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think that people bought 8086K $50 more for 2 "special" sheets only, at least I did it... :(

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ah well, collectors item!

  • @femz4952
    @femz4952 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Have you seen the leaked specs for ryzen third gen? They are absolutely insane. Intel is about to lose their place in first!!!!

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      About to watch a video on it, but to be honest I'm not really interested until I see official news, I feel like people put out fake leaked specs to over hype it, then they get upset in future when the improvements don't actually pan out.

    • @femz4952
      @femz4952 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jarrod'sTech yeah I hope they are actually good

    • @LocoMe4u
      @LocoMe4u 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Welp that didn't happen ryzen 3 is good but still behind Intel

  • @aahh5545
    @aahh5545 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    8700 seems better in terms of value

  • @nea3451
    @nea3451 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You're kinda late tho 😂

    • @JarrodsTech
      @JarrodsTech  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I can only make things when companies offer to send them out, being a small channel in Australia that is often not day 1 of a product release 😉