STOP These APERTURE MISTAKES! (In Architecture Photos)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2022
  • STOP These APERTURE MISTAKES! (Architecture Photos) - We look this week at the mistakes I have seen over and over again in architecture and fine art interior photography in recent years - the wrong aperture selection for the space. We look at the reasons why f11 or f16 is not ideal in these types of buildings - and what you should look to do.
    I UPLOAD EVERY SUNDAY - 5PM GMT.
    If you enjoyed this video, please consider giving it a thumbs up and let me know what you think in the comments below - I guarantee I will get back to you. Thanks for watching everyone - See you soon! James.
    jameskerwinphotographic.com/p...
    ☝️ Check out my 2023 & 2024 upcoming photography tours here! ☝️
    YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL BY PURCHASING ONE OF MY BOOKS THROUGH MY STORE HERE: jameskerwinphotographic.com/s...
    WATCH THESE PLAYLISTS NEXT:
    🔘All About Tilt-Shift Lenses - geni.us/AllaboutTiltshift
    🔘Architecture on Location - geni.us/Onlocation
    🔘Tutorials on Location - geni.us/Tutorialsonlocation
    🔻LET US CONNECT
    Website/Workshops & blog: jameskerwinphotographic.com/
    Instagram: / james.kerwin
    Join my Facebook Group: geni.us/theurbanbackground
    Twitter: / itsjameskerwin
    #architecture #abandonedplaces

ความคิดเห็น • 40

  • @kennethjonesphotography
    @kennethjonesphotography ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm shooting a Canon EOS R 30mp body using a combination of Canon L and Tamron glass (but, most recently with the original version of the Canon 24mm f/3.5 L tilt shift). And, as you stated in this video, I've also found (the hard way) that focus stacking for interior shots provides the highest quality results. Thanks, much for the instruction and examples; both have been very helpful.

    • @JamesKerwin
      @JamesKerwin  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad the theory has been backed up in such a way. :)

  • @GinoFoto
    @GinoFoto หลายเดือนก่อน

    Back in the DSLR era, the rule held true: the longer the exposure time, the more noise you'd get due to heat buildup in the sensor. However, modern sensors can actually benefit from longer exposures. So, nowadays, for maximum image quality, using longer exposure times is often preferable (within reasonable ambient temperatures, of course).
    That being said, it's certainly true that every serious photographer seeking the best image quality should be aware of the diffraction limit of their camera and lens combination.

  • @Chetan-K
    @Chetan-K ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much. This was very useful

  • @jamesmlodynia8757
    @jamesmlodynia8757 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In many places using a tripod is not always allowed or practical, when I photographed events, I took many establishing photos, I worked by myself and I had to carry all the camera equipment I needed to get through the day so a tripod was something that I would not carry, so I carried a micro 4/3 camera with a high quality wide angle lens, with the smaller sensor I could get a photo with greater depth of field. If I was only shooting interiors and not during events then I could use a different approach much like in your video. many people use full frame camera because of their better low light abilities but in my camera collection I have full frame, APSC and micro 4/3 Bodies because there are times that having a camera that gives you a greater depth of field at any given aperture can come in handy.

  • @midisax
    @midisax ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So true!

  • @paulowen5539
    @paulowen5539 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another good 'un!! I think the tendency to stop down to small apertures stems from the good old days of film photography (before digital/photoshop) allowed us the benefits of post processing? Needing maximum depth of field in one shot required these small apertures and associated issues. Focus stacking is the future!!

  • @noble_diamond
    @noble_diamond ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting 😊

  • @GaryGold
    @GaryGold ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello.Thanks.
    PS Christmas is a holiday of bringing happiness to every home, every family. Let your dreams come true, good luck and success will accompany your business!

  • @lukaszbrozek
    @lukaszbrozek 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I just discovered your channel. Your videos are one of my favourites I saw recently. Great work and can't wait to see more from you.

    • @JamesKerwin
      @JamesKerwin  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Lots of videos upcoming. There from Romania last month, a couple from Georgia and heading out tomorrow on a Turkish roadtrip.

    • @lukaszbrozek
      @lukaszbrozek 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JamesKerwin A lot to be seen. Can't wait and have fun. :D

  • @olafzijnbuis
    @olafzijnbuis 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You could use Canon's EOS Utility App on a notebook. Much easier to see the results (with remote shooting).
    And you can change the focus and trigger the shutter without touching the camera.
    You connect the camera with a USB cable. Works great.

    • @JamesKerwin
      @JamesKerwin  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for sharing - and watching! In commercial work, it is a great tip. Personal work - I have enough gear to carry in etc, but it is the best way!

  • @intransit2822
    @intransit2822 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Superb. So easy to follow and improve my own photography.

    • @JamesKerwin
      @JamesKerwin  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great to hear!

  • @vincealcazar2870
    @vincealcazar2870 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have just today located this work on TH-cam. An urban landscaper by disposition, I've recently arrived in the architectural photography domain with good kit and the will to excel. Thank you for your instructive approach.

    • @JamesKerwin
      @JamesKerwin  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pleasure - hope to see you around some more.

  • @shawndonnelly862
    @shawndonnelly862 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great videos James. If you were shooting the same scene with a DSLR, do you think your long shutter speed and focus stacking would introduce noticeable vibration into your final image from the mirror and shutter movement?

  • @luzr6613
    @luzr6613 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah... that difference is marked. Even on an average notebook screen and without a side-by-side comparison, the second image immediately jumped out at me. Point taken. Thank you, and have a good one.

    • @JamesKerwin
      @JamesKerwin  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, exactly. Thanks for watching.

  • @andreineagu.online
    @andreineagu.online ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello from România!

  • @peter-jac4143
    @peter-jac4143 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice report, please give some more information about bracketing in which software🙏

    • @JamesKerwin
      @JamesKerwin  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sure... watch out in the next few weeks!

  • @ascar77uk
    @ascar77uk หลายเดือนก่อน

    try HYPER-FOCAL focusing instead of stacking then you only need one image

    • @JamesKerwin
      @JamesKerwin  หลายเดือนก่อน

      acceptably sharp isn't perfectly sharp for large format printing though. Word of caution ⚠️ 👌

  • @luzr6613
    @luzr6613 ปีที่แล้ว

    My first time here and... oh wow! What a marvelous theme for your photography. In a different life i'd gnaw my own limbs off to have a go at this. Curses! Anyway - thanks for your efforts. Lkd&Subd. All the best from a cabin in a swamp in a rainforest in New Zealand.

    • @JamesKerwin
      @JamesKerwin  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Welcome aboard!

  • @andyv6127
    @andyv6127 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really interesting subjects. Wondered on your thoughts of using IS/IBIS on a tripod with R5 and an IS lens. I thought Canon said leave IS on regardless as camera knows, but many people say turn off IS/IBIS when using a tripod. Have you any thoughts or experiences?

    • @JamesKerwin
      @JamesKerwin  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      To be honest I have IBIS off at the minute.

  • @aaronfitzgerald9109
    @aaronfitzgerald9109 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why did you manually take three separate shots to focus stack in post, opposed to setting the focus stacking option to three shots in camera with the focus stack menu option?

    • @mejislasher
      @mejislasher 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Probably because he wanted to focus where he thought was the best spot

    • @JamesKerwin
      @JamesKerwin  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly 💯

    • @JamesKerwin
      @JamesKerwin  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I shoot manually and in RAW, I barely use in camera blend tools. Focus, HDR etc - I prefer to have control.

  • @Gtc-de8uq
    @Gtc-de8uq 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could you clarify about focusing "1/3rd of the way through" please? I learned photo theory a decade ago so this one escapes me :), thank you!

    • @JamesKerwin
      @JamesKerwin  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes sure - just means everything after this is tack sharp. But mostly works for focussing at anything past this point to be honest. Especially in architecture.

  • @mejislasher
    @mejislasher 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ok, but if you're advocating for f8 then shouldn't you compare a single f8 photo to a single f16 photo focused at the same point? Obviously the stacked f8 is going to look much sharper.... I'm not trying to argue anything other than the test itself is flawed. One of the points you made is that f16 takes longer to shoot, but if you stack f8 then it takes basically the same amount of time. I was waiting for the single f8 comparison to a single f16 and it never came :(

    • @JamesKerwin
      @JamesKerwin  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      If you look up focus distances you will see there is no point/need of f16 at this distance. Its an interior. I will redo the video test in the future - and show it on focus peaking for you! :)

  • @snapshopped
    @snapshopped หลายเดือนก่อน

    video duration: 11min
    message duration: 3 sec

    • @JamesKerwin
      @JamesKerwin  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes I should make every video 3 seconds long. Clever!