ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ย. 2024
- Click the link and use our code "GBMoist" to get a free hopper + free extra 10,000 Gellets with your order! www.inflcr.co/S... #GelBlasterPartner
This is the greatest ai art generation of All Time
Merch moistglobal.com/
I stream every day / moistcr1tikal
To artists like me that was scared of AI, don't buy into the fear mongering, what you should be concerned about is your own work. A person typing prompts into this machine and getting good results will never be able to feel the same joy you feel when working on a piece for days on end. Nothing will compare to the catharsis of painting, drawing and inking something YOU made.
hand work art never going to be replaced
Yeah I mean I don't think anybody is really arguing that. It's more selling your art that becomes tricky.
i started a fiverr account and have been making $100 a week selling ai art to clueless people lol
@@carto4028 not really as commissions and specialised priced will never be as good
@@armorofgod777 good for you I guess..
Charlie: "It can't"
AI: *Proceeds to can*
"Proceeds to can" insert the classy winnie the pooh meme
Can someone tell me which software is he using in this video?
@@SherinFunmes stable duffusion
Proceeds to can might be able to be a good punchline
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
Seeing Walter White wearing shades in a neon colour aspect is the perfect desktop wallpaper for me. Thank you for this gift Charlie
DONT READ MY USERNAME!
hi waltuh
Isn't that obvious? 🙄
MR HEISENBERG?!??!!!!!??11!!?!11!
how did you save it in high resolution tho
Charlie is single handedly gonna provide all the testing for stable diffusion
I'm better than peuingz0 🚌🚌🚌
@@josephrblake I'm better than donnylakehunt
@@Neetrin i believe that. Because anyone's better than Donny.
@@josephrblake wow what an original bot message
@@Qreamey i’m better then elijah curtis
The funny part is the AI probably knows how to draw Heisenberg so well because BB is getting so popular in 2022 and everyone is doing...things to the characters in all kinds of prompts
DONT READ MY USERNAME!
STFU bots
Breaking bad has always been popular it’s just now more people are making memes out of it
nah these bots are getting out of hand
I'm better than peuingz0 🚌🚌🚌
I swear these programs have gotten a thousand times better in like, 6 months
That’s AI for you
That's how learning works. It builds on itself. Only humans are dumb creatures that forget what they've learned, refuse to use what they've learned, and then die and lose all their progress.
🤖 Hail the bot generation.
Except comment bots. Those can die in a lake of battery acid.
Law of accelerating returns. This is why we gonna have a technological singularity
Just wait until the AI is used to recursively make better AI.
@@THeMin1000 elaborate pls. Ik sorta what it means, that we'll be developing tech so fast that it eventually will be infinity. But what would it look like irl
As someone who has been actively looking for a concept art job, this is highly concerning
to behonest considering all branches of industry, the last job that came to my mind that might be threatened by AI/Robots was original art. This is still so hard to wrap my head around, an AI that is able to create actuall 100% new Art instead of just copying something
Use Ai as a tool
Yeah, you might need a career shift. I am working on a game and we totally replaced not even concept art but background art with AI images using stable-diffusion. Being an artist is always a tough path in professional life, if you want to stay an artist go physical like sculpting or dance choreo because robotics are far behind AI currently.
You could become an AI programmer and help accelerate AI taking over the economy, that way the world society will be forced to adapt by making joblessness the norm and a comfortable lifestyle. Even just being a programmer is a good bet because everyone is too scared to give AI the ability to code, so far.
If you're any good then you shouldn't have anything to worry about. if ai art becomes anything good then it'll just be another tool artists will add to their toolbelt. there was a similar fear of 3d modeling programs replacing artists and it didn't happen, it just became another tool for artists to use. If anything if ai does become good it can really help artists with their workflow.
@@iminumst7827 If you're using Ai art for final production, have fun getting sued. Ai art still violates a ton of copyrights because it doesn't generate 100% original assets, it photobashes.
As an artist, I've come to find through my experiences in experimenting with various AI image generators that we're not going to be replaced. Of course, an AI can generate a lot of beautiful images, some that a fair number of people might not have thought to draw or create. It's good for bringing some ideas to life, things that an AI can visualize quite easily; at the end of the day, however, the AI doesn't think the way most artists do. The things AI create are absolutely impressive, as is the technology, but there's some things it can't create. I think to all the character designs and the concept art for items in games, I think of the oddly specific details that a person would want a sea-fairing cargo ship that can also travel in space to have. Rather than seeing AI generated art, I believe it can be used as a tool in the future. Have an AI create an image that can be refined or reworked to be what a person needs, or give someone ideas to create something else entirely on their own. If one day AI truly replaces all artists, down to the weird and unusual things many of us can come up with in our minds, I'll eat my sketchbook.
This is just the biggining give it another year and this AI will look old. This tech is moving at the speed of light. Be prepared for a lot of changes in the future.
@@e1622zelda It’s true that over time the AI will get better, but human art and the study of it will live on. Art in itself is a reflection of human life, you can see the all the different decisions that were made into making the piece, and even the context it was made in affects this. That’s what gives it meaning.
AI art is interesting because it LACKS the human element, asking it to spit out an image is a novelty in itself, and gets old. Beyond the basic prompt, AI art has nothing to dissect, there’s no emotional connection we can make to it other than just ‘liking’ it, due to its novelty.
In the future, We’ll still be analyzing the great artists of the past because of the deeper human connection we feel towards it. AI art is consumed and forgotten.
It’s also not human art- much of the joy of art is going wow, I can’t believe another human did that, I can’t do that, and it looks so real! As well as the art styles people create. Tbh ai art, while it looks cool, is not going to replace human drawn art because having something do it for you takes away the point of art. Yeah if you just want a pretty picture, it’s there, but for series, comics, picture books, graphic design, it’s all gonna stay human because otherwise the point is gone
Time to look for another job
Pray to the Lord that we get 20 more years.
Never has NFT been more pointless. With this tech people could make their own art and frankly some of this art is better
The human touch will always be better no matter what
NFTs have always been pointless. This didn’t make them pointless. Right click + save as made them pointless.
@Adolfizzz0 This says a lot about society
@@ferretyluv I mean I get the joke but in reality it's not as Black and white as that
@@ferretyluv NFTs aren't about having an image, it's about having ownership of a token that represents the official image. A rare pokemon card is just cardboard, anyone could recreate it, but it would have no value since it isn't official. Just like you right click and saving.
15:23 Bottom left guy literally has an umbrella holder on his waist, ai is genius I need one
Top right guy put 10000 rubber bands around his waist
The AI definitely still has it's limitiations when compared to human generated art, but it'd be interesting to see how advance this will get overtime.
The amount it's advanced in just the past 2 years is insane
If it continues at this rate, you won't have to wait long
How long till we can get complete cinematic movies or video games? I bet it’s not that long. Maybe a few decades. And i bet some would say way sooner than that.
Midjourney (the one that's gotten a lot of traction recently) is much better than the one Charlie is using for his videos, it's already more advanced than what you're seeing
Romans 10:9 because, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.dddd
1:40 This is already a thing. On the right there's a seed for the image, if its ticked it will use this same image then you can remove/add to it. Also it can generate speech bubbles if you try just typing comic in.
I'm better than peuingz0 🚌🚌🚌
Shut your mouth
This is not correct lol.
The seed will not "use the same image", the seed is the algorithm for the initial "noise" that is used as a base to generate an image, and using a "seed" is really only helpful for generating similar pieces of art while using the same prompt. If you were to type a completely different prompt in, even with the same seed, the image will be completely different, because all the seed does is effect the noise initialization by setting the noise algorithm to a specific value instead of a random value each time you generate an image.
You're thinking of using the "initial image" feature, which is right below the seed function in DeamStudio. This would allow you to use another image as a starting point. You can combine the "seed" and "initial image" features but they are two different functions.
Source: I use MidJourney, Dall-E 2, and DreamStudio. My preference is MidJourney, because their "--seed", "--beta", "--testp", "--ar:" and "--creative" arguments result in some of the highest quality images (obviously depending on the prompt) out of any AI image generator. And I've used a lot.
There's a different version of stable diffusion you can get for your desktop that lets you outline the part of the image you want to keep and have it generate the rest. Well it's technically not a different version of stable diffusion, but it's a different UI for it.
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
14:07 Top-right looks like cyberpunk Mona Lisa
5 years from now: AI TH-camrs are taking over
DONT READ MY USERNAME!!
I hope that happens soon
you could probably use deepfake to change your face and another AI to change your voice...s who knows
@@dontreadmyprofilepicture6945 epic 😂
that would be awesome! If they get good and evolve as fast as these art AIs, just imagine the amount of good content would show up on the website
The fact that these AI imaging softwares are now becoming capable of replicating specific artists’ styles in a convincing way seriously scares me about the future of art as a career path.
@laskin riubn Except that AI can already replicate dead musicians and make new songs that sound exactly like them lol.
@Necrotron Commenting Unit Cringe 🗿
Lol fk art as a career path tbh
the art business isn't gonna crumble from AI generated art, because simply put, humans will never stop making art, regardless of medium. it's not that AI art is "better" because there are still humans who can make art just as impressive. it might take more time but I highly doubt art commissions are gonna stop just because there's an AI that can generate an image in seconds. It's still not the same as a real painting, but I suppose AI could start making physical paintings, we're not there yet though lol
@laskin riubn I mean emotions and ideas just come from our brain, a very delicate and complicated machine. If AI can get to that point in terms of intelligence, there’s literally nothing AI can’t do. Art, music, philosophy, compassion, ethics everything we thought were exclusive to humans
10:52 perfect video editing charlie, simply immaculate
To me, the scariest part about AI is how fast it’s evolving and how fast it’s taking over so many different fields.
DONT READ MY USERNAME!!
Damn, you fell off.
@Christopher Pezet (I hate niɡɡers) damn bro stop being racist
Hopefully one day an AI can replace your boring ass comments
What the fuck Is going with youtube nowadays
My designer professor and everyone around me hates, well it is an art and design college after all.
He said “it looks good on the first glance, that itself is terrifying, although when going in to the details, it starting to break apart, and it is soul-less.”
Still I think it has potential, it just needs more time.
I'm better than peuingz0 🚌🚌🚌
"Soulless". Sounds like coping lol, I've gotten ones out that are absolutely indistinguishable from something made by a human.
@@feefree3901 soulless is completely cope. clinging to something that might make human made art keep its value. I'm not saying AI will replace human art but a lot of artists who follow a generic artstyle will definitely not have a good time.
Your professor is huffing copium. I made an orangutan wearing jorts on this website, and he looks absolutely stunning, realistic and filled with personality. I’ve tricked people into thinking I’m on vacation in the Bahamas by making AI generated images of summer palaces on the water even though I’ve never been there in my life.
Yeah i kinda want to use it to make land scapes then draw stick figures over it.
One time, a person said that he wants to make a machine that can draw better than humans
HAYAO MIYAZAKI was so so disheartened , he was speachless. He said - it is like the end of the world, i am losing faith in people.
I think art must be achieved by hardwork and passion
I love this comment
He said "its an insult to life itself"
Miya-san is so based.
"Modern life is so thin and shallow and fake. I look forward to when developers go bankrupt, Japan gets poorer and wild grasses take over." Hayao Miyazaki
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range Of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
I mostly just use ai art to recreate my dreams. It's pretty accurate sometimes
that's such a good idea thanks dude
glitch in the matrix
true, and thanks for reminding me of what i ought to really do rn
That's actually creepy
13:17 is probably one of the best laughs ive gotten in a long time
7:05 That’s genuinely badass
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range Of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
9:17 why is no one talking about how cool this robot looks
This shit is so mind blowing. If you told me as a kid that we’d be able to give an ai any prompt and they’d spit out any photorealistic image you want of anything. I’d be shocked
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
5:00 You asked for moon ninja and you got a picture of the moon and a ninja invisible to the untrained eye. The AI knows what it's doing.
Gave up on learning to draw and my dream of becoming an artist a while ago. But now I'm giving up on that dream even harder, cause holy shit, some AI art is absolutely insane how good it is.
Bruh don't let something like this discourage you. Drawing is fun and cool, even if it may be hard to learn the basics sometimes
Floaty dream if thats all it takes for you to completely give up
Not like it matters to me tho
@@indigo7898 your the floaty
@@Danariya1 no bro, nobody cares about our ugly ass drawing while they can generate stunning artistic images like this(use midjourny to blow your own mind), I'm not drawing anymore, it's pointless in every aspect. And AIs will get even better and more advanced over time.
@@axolniz6597 then your not enjoying drawing in the first place.
What you like is the recognition, not the act of drawing
if anyone wanted to play with the stuff @16:00 ish
by ismail inceoglu dragon bibin hans thoma greg rutowski alexandros pyromallis nekro rene maritte illustrated, perfect face, fine details, realistic shaded, fine-face, pretty face
As an artist myself I knew from a young age that the market was over-saturated. A lot of people don’t understand that the art market has already been falling apart. Most of the rising artists weren’t going to have a chance anyways. In this day and age you can’t have a full job just doing art unless you’re lucky. It’s best as a second job unless you are going into specific fields but even then
competition is fierce. I honestly think this will slim the numbers for a while and help the market stabilize. Ai can do a lot but I doubt it’s direct communication with a client. For it is not just an instruction it is an artistic vision that an ai must grab. So while I feel like ai art will replace certain jobs there will always be a need for human artists for specific qualities. And actually traditional art might be on the rise again now. Digital art has dominated for a while. I’m honestly interested in the future.
I thought so too when I was younger. But I've become a freelance artist in the last few years and realized there is a lot of money to make if you know where to look and how to present yourself. Of course it's not easy at first, but you can make it.
AI is quite worrysome thought. Companies are greedy and of course they will use AI instead of paying artists if possible. But the brighter side of AI just being an aid to speed up the workflow also seems icky.... Art is something that is supposed to take time. I think that one essence of art is not rushing it, thinking it over. But nowaday artists are forced into being creative factories, producing artwork after artwork fast and even more so now :(
As an artist, I can't rely on AI even if I wanted to because I run an animation channel, and I'm starting to get good, at first I was concerned but, after thinking about it, and seeing my improvment, I've felt a sudden ease, I just told myself, that even if art dies, I will still enjoy making my own, and I will keeping making animations so that's good enough for me.
@@wilnonis Artists already have to rush with actual jobs. If you are not fast or productive enough than someone will replace you so I feel like the time argument makes no sense. Freelance art is very different from the majority of the art business world because it is where most make success these days but it’s unstable and nonsensical with value. You’re telling me you make 30-50k a year through art though? If not then you are struggling with pay as an artist like the majority. I’d be impressed with 25k. If you do then you are lucky. Yes there are niche areas of market and buyer subcultures but you have to be lucky to find them. They always will get found in the end as well and you have to hope to stay relevant and keep your monopoly and clients. You can not with confidence say someone will make it. Everyone has a different situation and different bills to pay.
Aye, you are forgetting about porn artists.
One of the biggest issues in the entertainment industry is visual artist saturation. Game studios have too many artists and not enough game designers. Movies have too many CGI artists and not enough good writers. It's created this hilariously dire situation in where artists are disposable, rushed, and wasted. These are the artists that will be replaced first, no doubt.
You are underestimating just how good AI will get at artistic vision, it won't even be that long until AI has better artistic vision than people. There will never be a need for a human artist in the future, in-fact, there's never been a need for a human artist ever. All of art is convincing people something that does nothing has value, and as long as rich people exist, professional freelance art will exist. So you are right in that sense that art cannot be replaced entirely.
12:13 Charlie going completely silent for a second when witnessing that ronin image was really cool
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
We need a full vid of Charlie and the boys just goofing around with the gel blasters
you could use novel ai to write the story and then dream studio to make the panels kinda like how AI roguelike works
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
I would like to point out, first of all. These ai art things haven’t existed for very long and have gotten pretty good, especially considering it makes these in less than 10 seconds sometimes. Also, the site shown here, isn’t finished. The link on it says “beta” at the beginning, so ai art is only going to get better and better over the years, and very quickly too.
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
Over the next few months. That’s what an open ai researcher has said. It will take months to get to photorealism. Then they move on to videos and 3d
@@rem7502 literally gonna be able to completely deepfake videos of people doing incriminating shit and no one’s ever going to know what’s true and fake anymore
8:26 Literally Jesus
yo moist, the comic book idea at the beginning can go like this: you askanother AI to give you a storyboard, perhaps the idea for the storyboard can be autogen too, make sure it's specific in terms of how the characters react so you can translate that into the art, take camera angles into account, and for what they say you put more autogenerated speech (the speech bubbles themselves are probably going to be from you, but the words inside will be AI) and that should be about it, idk if this would work but it's an idea
1:30 the feature you're thinking of is called textual inversion, and you can do it with SD. you have to train it with multiple images to get good results tho
10:21 So we ain't gonna talk about how the guy on the left only has one arm
17:30 "It fucked up his hand a little, he got a floating finger..."
Don't do it.
Please don't do it.
I HAVE TO DO IT
*_K I D N A M E D F I N G E R:_*
Waltuh
I just find A.I. generated art so fascinating! I've been using it as inspiration for my own art, as like a way to try to map things out since I struggle with visualizing the composition and generally just putting my ideas down on paper / canvas. I personally think it's a good tool for artists to use, not something to fear 100%. Plus it's fun to mess around with :)
Where can I try. I've got a few ideas
@@deegillespie5305 DreamStudio, NightCafe, Artbreeder, and Midjourney are the ones I know about!
@@sw4mpy Wombo dream is also pretty good
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
what a solid take. im impressed
you know as an artist I think this really eliminates our own need to problem solve and find the best way to reach the final artwork on our own, there's nothing like seeing a blank canvas and the satisfaction you get from putting the artwork on it from your own skill. The fact that it takes away our need to solve problems just seems like our brains will stagnate and be overly reliant on AI for everything and as a member of gen z we've de-evolved enough already
7:53 STONKS
17:05 He looks like Dynamo from The Running Man lol
Hell, maybe James IS Dynamo, and we're just finally catching up to that future...
"the gellets don't hurt"
the gel blasters: 3:14
AI Art should be used for forensic sketches and there should be a website people can go to when they report a crime they can be able to describe the person they saw do it and get a sketch or multiple sketches generated by the AI or unidentified persons. Stuff they already do but probably not with AI. Even if they do though, something like this for the general public.
There was prob a ninja at 4:54 you just can't see him because he is invisible in stealth mode
The gel blaster clip of you guys playing around looked like a live leak video
0:51 please don't do that
AI art is perfect for soooo many things; avatars, posters, promotional, thumbnails, and just aboot everything that isn't a realistic interpret of your company/self (unless you are an otter wizard).
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
it’s really cool for sure, but then if it becomes pubicly accessible i worry for artists who will basically be out of commission work for stuff like that, which a lot of them make their livings on lol
The ad at 3:01 had me pause
For a moment
Rest in Peace Kentaro Miura, I read all the Berserk mangas throughout highschool, it broke my heart that he passed
@liouy cnny what does that havr to do with Miura's passing and Berserk
I wanna be pegged by Casca
It’s like putting tags for a specific show
Why I'm gonna be majoring in computer science with specialization in AI
Probably the most future proof major for now.
Look up the AI’s depiction of the first, second, third, fourth and fifth dimensions. Its a trip. Especially the first dimension
@Adolfizzz0 wtf
I like to compare AI art to the camera. A camera can take perfect pictures of real life and yet realism painting still exists because people still want to do it and people still want to buy it. Maybe we might a something new with AI art because with the camera some artists started to do other things like impressionist artworks that are more based on emotion
its still here but much much less people needed painting compared to hundred years ago when there isnt camera for photograph. i was born in 2000 asia and i grew up saw many poster and text on small business used to be handmade and hand drawn as the modern technology isnt here at the time and very expensive. Now almost all of it is printed .
A picture can’t replicate an art style, that’s one of the main reasons art prevailed, it fundamentally offered a different end experience compared to a picture.
AI art can replicate art styles and could even create its own, in a sense it is offering the same end experience as hand drawn/digital art but with the advantage of taking thousands of times less to do each drawing and not requiring the years of experience people do.
AI art essentially provides the same end experience as human art, but without the time and cost inconvenience.
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range Of other content and I’m still working On quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
You cannot tell me that 7:05 is not a manga panel that is so fucking sick
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range Of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
I'm loving the ai art videos. I hope in the future there will still be a way to generate the goofy art pieces from less advanced Ais like craiyon
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range Of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
I want someone who works with AI and machine learning to explain to us why james cordon vs vegeta does not work, I think it'd be pretty interesting
Oil and vinegar my dude
probably simply not enough training data with the label of "vegeta"
Or James Corden just doesn't suit
This ai isn't able to do it. But one could create an ai to be able to do that. Or this same ai can also evolve.
They wouldn't know. This stuff is just trained with lots and lots of pictures. In the end you get a neural network that is about as hard to understand as our brain (though a lot smaller in scale of course). So you'll see regions that activate and regions that don't when given a certain input, but you'd have to study the network for a long time to deeply understand what's happening.
13:40 You can question what is going on there, but I just want to ask why are his sunglasses melting in his beard?
8:35 Looks like Charlie and Asmondgold had a child.
Hearing the indigestion asmr really sets the mood thanks Charlie.
Animators went through this with Dain interpolation AI... and in between animators are still kicking it with the help of A.I. Artists have nothing to worry about
fair point
The fact that the AI was prompted to draw Critikal and got Jesus instead means that they are indeed becoming too sentient and may take over the world Skynet style someday.
2:34 -> This kind of laugh has become routine in these videos xD
I wonder if big companies like Disney or Nintendo will soon make these AI unable to create copyrighted material
It's The Congress all over again..
I'm better than peuingz0 🚌
But isn't that impossible? Like these images are made from millions upon millions of images from millions of people, some of which have enough money to get copyright on their art. And couldn't you plausibly say that one of their ""copyrighted"" pieces was made in part from an image that actually had copyright? They could and it would just be a mess....though corporations have so much money that they could probably just throw it at the problem to make it go away
@@stitches768 Some AIs already won't do porn or faces, I think it wouldn't be that hard to block more themes in the future
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range Of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
I don't think AI art will ever completely replace art, It'll get better and better but even photography couldn't replace art, there will always be work for specific designs and preferences which prompts can never give but it will effect the industry a lot
I'm better than peuingz0 🚌🚌🚌
No, it won't, because imo the commercial uses for AI art are extremely limited, as it copies/examines images of existing art for its generated art, so it'll most likely be breaking copyright laws iwould think
A.I. are able to make life-like photographs and flawlessly play it off as an actual place and time someone took a picture using a camera.
A.I. being artistic has already succeeded our own abilities as far back as 2017
@@SuddenlyPoni3s AI art has no copyright anyway as only human creations qualify for copyright so that completely kills the incentive to use it. Anyone could use those assets without legal repurcussion which is a no go for a commercial medium.
@@ChaoticKrisis yeah but how do you prove it’s ai art if they don’t livestream the creation like Charlie and just claim they made it?
I can see AI art being useful for broad commercial purposes, like logos and stuff, where it's meant to convey an idea but not to express something deep or foster some kind of intimate connection. I don't think that human art will ever be replaced. If we look at music, there have been self-playing pianos since the 1800s, and there has been digital, AI-generated music for quite a while now, but there are more musicians than ever.
I'm better than peuingz0 🚌🚌🚌
yeah and self playing pianos cost thousands of dollars, ai art costs nothing
@@eugenekrabs141 Creating digital music costs nothing. How many robot musicians do you listen to?
thank you, that does quell my worries
Yea it's very similar to music stuff. Vsts have been around forever and you don't even need a drummer/guitarist but a real person will always be preferred/better
It's only a matter of time before someone trains an AI generated image model on rule34 images. Get ready for that coomer meme apocalypse.
this will be mankind's best creation
Hate to tell you but it already happened, there's an AI out there that is making a new furry porn image every forty minutes. There's another that just straight up makes pictures of women's asses
I mean... This same model already does that just disable the nsfw filters
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
This is already starting to happen
I use that exact prompt Charlie keeps at the end with a bunch of artists and it makes beautiful works of art with whatever I put in front of it, I now refer to it as the god prompt and you should definitely give it a whirl. Thank you for this gift Charlie, before I saw this video I occasionally made abominations in dall e mini but now I have witnessed true masterpieces and I'll never turn back.
ay man can you paste in under this comment
"by ismail inceoglu dragan bibin hans thoma greg rutkowski alexandros pyromallis nekro rene maritte illustrated, perfect face, fine details, realistic shaded, fine-face, pretty face"
If you're going for anything horror related try adding "Nightmare (insert character here) in the style of meatcanyon" in front of it along with whatever characteristics you want, I did it as a meme but it churns out some mind boggling stuff.
You’re literally stealing real people’s work to make your fake art. Fucking hell AI “artists” are pathetic.
@@hellodolly7989 I really hope this is a bit, if it's not you should try going outside once in a while, get some fresh air, touch some grass.
Steampunk Cyberpunk Cityscape, Concept Art, 4K HD is def wallpaper worthy i'd try it
The worse part is it registered Charlie as Jesus which means 1, he’s Jesus 2, it’s understanding jokes now.
Everyone talks about how good AI is at art, but no one talks about the fact that it takes all its resources (images) from the internet
This is one of the biggest misunderstandings about this technology, is doesn't. I could right now, download the 8 GB stable diffusion model, turn off the internet, run it and it will give my the same results. It doesn't sample images from the Internet, the AI has an actual abstract understanding of Language and Art but it learned this form images on the internet.
This brings up a large legal dilemma. Is training an AI on someone else art theft of dose it, like with humans count as inspiration?
@@Broken_Mesh he probably means it trained on images found on the internet not that it uses internet.
Also this model is built using an open source dataset (from laion) with images that are unlicensed or free to use for any purpose so there is no art theft involved here, if they have an issue probably stop uploading images without licensing and only sell to private clients or something (and not be annoyed if they too use it for some dataset)
That isn’t quite true, but why is that a problem?
It's sad that even creativity is being automated so companies can save money on artists/ creatives.
Additionally, it feels like some people who are gloating about how artists will be replaced are just doing so because they think artists should get a 'normal' job too, like they did themselves.
You cannot deny that AI art will definitely help indie companies save some much needed money for more important things than to give it to an artist (talented or otherwise) and then wait for a long time for them to finish said art
@@Frawst_ I agree on the concept, and am aware how long creating artistic resources takes for indie games.
I'd argue nevertheless that indie games especially need personality and a lot of that stems from consistent worldbuilding, depicted by an iconic art style. Good concept art for games is based off of deep considerations for what the game stands for and what it is trying to say, which AI should not be responsible for in my opinion.
Ai for both writing and visual art are being developed rapidly and can surely grease the wheels of production by helping artists do their work more efficiently when used properly, but I am afraid of potential overuse or replacement of artists resulting in souless/ meaningless works and lost jobs. There are so many incredibly talented artists that work for minimum wages, so it is ridiculous to me that creative is one of the first things that need to be cheapened out on.
Ofc to everyone their own opinion, but I am just concerned as an artist (despite working in a physical medium for my living so nothing really changes for me), even if the dedication and ingenuity of the teams developing these Ai is awesome.
Exactly, entering this comment section is so hurtful as an artist I won’t be coming back…
Also for the stupid first commenter, no thankfully, YOU CANNOT SELL AI GENERATED IMAGES, cause so many copyrights will be infringed it’s crazy. It’s not legal
@@PossibleBat Resorting to name calling is childish on your end, but I apologise if what I said hurt your feelings... wasn't my intention. I have no skin in the game
As for your other point, you can't sell it YET because it's a gray area of copyright and no one has brought forth an issue about it, an argument can be made that the art made by the algorithm is transformative and therefore fair use and the new copyright falls on the one who wrote the algorithm
Edit- actually you CAN sell AI generated art at least in the US (just googled it) you have to license it from the AI holder, because as i stated... Its transformative enough and falls under a gray area of copyright
P.s. If you're just going to be juvenile in your reply, don't bother. I'll be ignoring it
@@merileopardisaksassa7030 those are personal opinions and i agree to them
But the 'soul' of a human artist's art usually comes with a hefty price tag, especially if it's good art made by a well established artist and many indie company rightfully will choose to go the next best thing that's cheaper and quicker and AI can provide that... From what I've seen the art can be good and it's only going to get better with time
I still think money should go to an artist, if a corporation or individual can afford it... It was not my intention to make it seem otherwise. I'm merely stating that the potential benefits of the AI generated art cannot be so easily ignored
1:40 thats literally the intial image feature in the corner
I tried Spiderman vs. MasterChief... one picture was an fusion of body parts, one was them together(though MasterChief looked like a limited memory version), and it gave me 3 Spiderman shooting a web. Actions are difficult.
Sooo many people have been making comicbooks now using AI, they make the images and then use a secondary app to build the whole comic.
Also you mentioned wanting to put in the 'reference photo' to carry on the prompt, I use Midjourney and you can do exactly that, it's pretty cool.
Yeah im calling scam on this one. I ve been following the ai bs for some time and there is not anything like that. And likely wont be
As a graphic designer in University this scares the shit outta me
this is only the beginning, switch while you can
I'm better than peuingz0 🚌🚌
Lol should have went into a technology major like CS or engineering lol
@@jonathanmaticic9082 Im glad I catched this shit at the last second. I was okay with the odds being against me making it as a concept artist before AI (it was always risky), but now? Hell no. I want a house and food. I do CS now.
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range Of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
7:38 That's the sound Miss Piggy makes in Bed.
1:41 "that is asking a Lot"
No, it's not. The answer to the question "Could it do that?" is "It only does that." Naming and referencing things is how it "thinks".
I can't draw to save my life. So for something like this to come onto the market, this is kinda neat to conceptualise story ideas into reality even if it is a little janky.
This makes me worry about artists. What if they go out of business someday because AI can make art much faster?
DONT READ MY USERNAME!
The demand will go down 100% but it will still be a field , AI art will probably become a lot better than human art , but anyone would pick human art over ai art if they are of a quality that is usefull, also conveying your thoughts is also much easier with a human incase of commissions
They would deserve it.
(Human) art will probably shift to a more narrative focus -- an AI still can't tell an engaging story with their artwork (yet).
I'm at art school and I'm glad I want to learn robotics and machine learning because the AI seems to be the ending for our artist careers
as an artist i despise AI art
Very reasonable
I think it's not as bad as you think
As an artist, I say bring it on!!!! Very few people have my skills anymore, and people are willing to pay very well for my art because it's REAL.
@@Deadsmegma yeah, perhaps.
@@Joe-nu4rm i like that mentality.
A CFG higher than 8 will begin to ignore parts of your prompt to focus on what it believes to be the "main elements", simplifying what you asked for quite a bit; you generally want CFG around 6-8. This is part of the reason why you couldn't get it to draw the ninja on the moon, or make characters in action scenes; it's not that SD is not capable.
Also, steps higher than 50 on most samplers will DIVERGE rather than CONVERGE to the prompt, which takes it further away from what you want. And inputting a seed will start the AI off from that "position", based on the prompt, which is why people were telling you to remove it to get different results.
at 1:30 there is something similar to this, its called NovelAI. you can carry on stories rather than art but its very cool
@Adolfizzz0 was this made with novel?
For those of you who think this will snuff put actual artists, I believe it would only make them look better. I can't explain it atm but I feel like it would be similar to how people view reposts vs original posts.
Maybe. But this will egregiously undermine people's trust in what art was even created genuinely and what images were generated through AI. People will lie. And regardless of how people feel the quality and discrepancy between genuine and AI now, it will be used in bad faith in the very near future and none of us will be able to tell the difference.
7:33 Doesn't come even close to Dalle2 but unfortunately it's hard to get access to Dalle-2, I've got it though, on two separate accounts.
8:42 Charlie is Jesus confirmed
This could be a cool way to give People Ideas for Backgrounds and Designs and stuff
Watching this made me learn that if you wanted good images you need to focus more on like artist, and types of illustrations rather then just placing down nouns. As he said it's more focused on landscape rather then verbs. Maybe it'll get there one day.
I wonder what the Academy of Fine Arts in Vienna thinks of these pieces?
If you didn't tell them they'd be all over it like rats on feces. They'd endlessly praise it as almost a work of God. Then when you tell them it's AI they'd say it's full of flaws and horrifying.
Art is shallow because it's represented by shallow humans. They only see what they want to see.
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range Of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
Listen I'm an artist myself and the reality is the AI revolution is inevitable and it's going to affect a lot more than just 2D artists. We are at a point where AI can make perfect 3D models, rigging and animation from a still image. AI can clone a voice just by listening to a 30 second clip. Text to code already exists and text to videos is coming.
What I'm saying is yeah it's rough. But you can't stop it. All you can do is adapt and learn to embrace these new tools.
What it means is that governments will need to implement UBI very soon because millions of artists, modelers, animators, programmers and voice actors are about to lose their job.
What's UBI
@@kikc Universal Basic Income.
It's what Andrew Yang was proposing in 2016 because of machines replacing a lot of jobs. Well now on top of robots there's AI threatening millions of jobs too so we're at a point where UBI isn't a maybe but a necessity. Otherwise millions of people will become homeless soon.
Ai art just looks good and realistic but the only big difference when it draws a character it doesn’t look its human idk but i absolutely still can see the difference between normal art and ai art
Truth, my brother has been making AI concept art and humans through AI and without even knowing I told him, “that looks AI generated.” He said “it is”
7:19 lol the voice crack
6:15 he spat on our jays
I personally don't think its taking over, but its more of a stepping stone for us artist to keep building off of. Its like how painters were struggling when cameras were invented, bit you know what? They kept on painting.
@UCK3IUnT_6tJ5riiGDEtVCoA bro how do these bot comments not get auto deleted by youtube 🤣🤣
fuck bots
It’s a bit difficult because these tools steal work from artists to ‘train’ their AI. You can see their signatures sometimes when generating. It’s not fair towards people who have worked hard.
Unfortunately as tech progresses, people are going to want to use these tools instead of hiring artists, as these tools are obviously cheaper than a commission. Which sucks a lot.
For context, when cameras became a thing realism took a hit and we got the modern art revolution. Wonder where this will go.
Its about innovation, trough all the history humanity pushed the boundaries of what we call art and if this ai was created in 19th century we would never get cubism, suprematism, dadaism and such, ai works by the rules, we create the rules
You could take any of the good images and just clean them up, then they will be really good pictures. Thinking of using this for concept art/ideas
or a thumbnai generator for artwork..because I still get satisfaction out of seeing a blank workspace/canvas and putting in the art myself
W
@@kylelee5966 true, this would be really good for references
You know you can keep the good parts then select an area to re-do.
7:28 now that's badass
From what I played with, it can't really give me exactly what I want so i think i'll stay with human artists for a while. It can make cool pictures yeah but I want specifics and intricate details. The quality of the art doesn't matter much to me, all that matters is that my vision comes to fruition.
artists definitely appreciate your support. It's a really nerve-wracking time for the community rn.
Little does he know, Charlie is actually feeding the AI more scenarios that gives it a chance to get better and better as it is always learning. One day when the tech becomes a mainstay, we have Critikal to thank for the fraction of his contribution
Damn these bots
I'm better than peuingz0 🚌🚌🚌
AI isn't always learning, Machine Learning is, the results that ML spits out are then used by AI to perform a task
That's not how this AI works.
It feeds off of art, like pictures and paintings, not prompts. The prompts are just describing what the user wants.
Think of it like this:
Let's say you want a burger and asked for the chef to make a burger with extra meat in it. The chef is the AI that uses certain ingredients, or artpieces, and make something out of it that caters to your liking. You could then give the chef some feedbacks after you ate the burger.
A.I. is capable of making 'art' because it's been fed with our art and thus "taught" what art looks like. All it's doing is replicate what we already did by feeding from the data, there is no "original" tought or feeling when creating those. A.I. also only generate art when a human makes an input for it to generate art based on a keyword or phrase, the lack of feeling and basic necessities means A.I have no reason to do anything out of sheer will, since it lacks reasons to do anything if not told to, unlike humans who make art to express themselves in ways words wouldn't do the job
Yeah not sure why people aren't realizing this.
I'm better than peuingz0 🚌🚌
yes, it is taught what it looks like, you are right, sadly for you nobody cares about if a human made it or not and they just want a picture, which the ai supplies them with
True! All the AI is really doing is making associations between patterns of 1's and 0's.
Very apt and articulate.
Fun fact spares are a one handed weapon and a pike is a two handed version of a spare and they are usually the long ones. Just depends on how you hold it. If I'm wrong feel free to comment on it