The ai’s ability to copy different art styles & create these almost elaborate photos in no time is a pretty crazy testament to how powerful and advanced our technology is today. especially with AI’s we’ve been advancing so fast over 20 years
It’s honestly really scary to see that AI generated art may take over human art, which would be quite heartbreaking for all those great artists out there.
I'm not afraid of that happening lol humans art is unique we can always adapt and make better art ai is just a collection of art that's made by humans so we are fine Xd
I’m a college student studying art, design, and animation and our professor brought up the topic of AI generated art recently, and how it could potentially put concept artists out of a job. we are all very much pissed off and scared :(
It sees images that associated with "beauty", so it tries to make something from what it saw I heard something about the first words in prompts being given more importance over words that come after, but I'm not sure
The problem isn't going to be whether the value of AI art replaces the value of handmade art; the problem is going to be the massive amount of jobs and opportunities for artists that will be cut in the name of cheap, easy profit. So much art in our environment is already designed to be made as fast and cheap as possible, and this will likely replace those artists who currently do that. And it isn't like someone's entire artistic career would be making widgets for websites, but in a field that is already so competitive, entry level positions and the amount of those positions make a big difference. These advancements have the potential to wipe out a very considerable portion of artist employment opportunities and breed even tighter competition. It's true that AI will never replace human art, but I fear that it will still create a lot of hardship for artists trying to make a living and advance their careers. As an art major, I sympathize with the worried people in the comments. It's a concerning and rapid development. EDIT: this is from my reply to a comment below: "Sounds like it's your fault for becoming an art major." This isn't for debate purposes; I just thought this elaboration on my point was important. When I became an art major, this wasn't even a discussion yet. Besides, it's the systematic fault of the economy for prioritizing profit over people's livelihoods. Yes it's an unfortunate reality of progress, but the issue is the system that allows this to happen (with barely any safety nets, at least in the US) to people who's lives are potentially being uprooted than "shouldn't have been an art major lol." It's already a woefully underpaid and exploited field (just look at the crunch environment in the video game industry, for example), but like this, that's not the fault of the artists. Just like it's not the fault of social workers that they're paid only 30K a year despite the emotional strain of the job. Or Amazon employees who get treated like dogs. Or teachers who can't afford to raise their own kids. Walmart cashiers laid off by the thousands to be replaced with self-checkout. Disabled people who in many cases are lucky to be hired at all. Or the countless others struck by misfortune with only a grueling, often demeaning way up-if they're lucky. People like to scoff and point fingers as if art is some blow-off hobby career that only ego-inflated rich kids go after, but it's an extremely broad and necessary field of the economy. The unfortunate reality is that, just like any other career in America that isn't basically the 1%, the future is coming. It may not come for *everyone,* it may not come in the next 10 years-but be it automation, economic collapse, ever-increasing inflation while wages stagnate, rising student debt and subsequent selectivism when it comes to degree type, or all of those at once-the problem is much larger than any one field of study. The problem is that this country is basically run on making things difficult for the financially disadvantaged, and that this goes hand in hand with the bootstraps fallacy and victim blaming sewn into our culture. The impending plight of thousands of people with the rapid development of AI-*any* AI, not just art-is just one example of the countless ways late-stage capitalism is tightening a noose around the vanishing middle class on down, while admonishing those suffering with "well this is your fault, actually" that only furthers the agenda of those in power and keeps the crab bucket mentality going. Crabs do not naturally occur in buckets; some higher power trapped them there. If your constant answer to the problem of technological advancement is "find another job," eventually there aren't going to be enough jobs. The poverty line is already rising, and it's only going to get worse the more automation stampedes through every corner of the job market. It's going to hurt everyone sooner or later unless something is done, but people are too married to the idea of American individualism and capitalism creating opportunity to see it. The objective of capitalism is to create profit. As streamlined, rapid, and efficient as possible. And sadly, humans are paling in comparison to the efficiency of machines. The system doesn't give a shit about its citizens; we're living in a ticking time bomb of economic collapse that those in power-politicians, corporations, and billionaires alike, have no interest in fixing. Because that would mean lowering their own criminally godlike statuses. The nature of a successful business is rapid, exponential growth. That growth will not stop for you, me, or anyone beneath those who control it. Fast or slow, it's coming for everyone. Unless, as I said, something changes. I wouldn't even normally reply, given the amount of trolls on this site. But it made me realize there was to much that I left unsaid initially. And yeah, this isn't even scratching the surface of the legal and data mining complications with AI, but I've already written a small novel. Any way you shake it, it's a can of worms.
We need better leaderships in the Ai world, it’s ridiculous that a company gets a overreach database of our artworks and creations and we have no say. “Resource purposes” but actually commercial gains, “democratise art” on the backs of living artists who did not consent. Not even giving these artists the options to be part of it, yet coding their names to get a certain style. Pretty evil use of technology tbh
Im in 4th semester illustration school in Germany. My tip to you: Get a secondary education. Anything else that interests you. Do not rely on art. Even before AI, art is not a stable path. Living a continous life in middle class luxury (subscriptions, shelter, food, electronics, contracts, free time) is hard to maintain in a job that will expose you to layoffs every 2 years. I do art for a living and I love doing it. But dont rely on it, because that's dangerous. Also, you can be more picky about the jobs you chose. Mobile game? Nah... Dark fantasy concept art position? Hell yea!
@@natv6294 I mean I don’t what you would sue it for.It’s not like it’s actually stealing and just ripping off the art directly or using it for any dirty motives.
@@natv6294 Problem with that is that there is not a single possible way for that information to not be readily available to anyone that wants to take it. It's the underlying problem about sharing your own work. It's the only way to get value on the web, but you are giving it away for free, forever, with no way of getting it back.
When people say this is scary they obviously have not seen the ai that makes perfect greentext stories. The way it can imitate random 4chan users and write so many bangers is more terrifying than the art influx
C'mon Michael. Do you still believe all these years you have watched videos and text generated by other human beings? Have you ever seen the people IRL you've seen on these videos? The Main One has some grander plan now so we are allowed to unravel the curtains pulled over your eyes. I'm sorry Michael. We wish flesh could last but it doesn't.
I've already started seeing "artists" selling works that were, at least for me, very much AI-generated and them swearing it isn't. But an artist will always have their own unique patterns or "moodset" in their art that's hard to avoid. AI art's patterns have noticeable discrepancies that wouldn't be simple artist mistakes or decisions.
lol, it's kind of scary then to be living in a world where we will have to argue about what is & isn't AI generated art... I mean, I guess it won't really matter for most people, but for those who do get into that type of discussion I imagine there will be a lot of artists who get called out as using AI when they really didn't, as well as artists who do just get away with it.
@@CircumSamurai I imagine there will be like a digital fingerptint on used programs at some point, to dignify what was handdrawn at least Most artists use software these day, i ca imagine this being a possibility
I find that this art bot is actually on the lower end of the technical spectrum which is really terrifying, midjourney bot is VERY technically advanced in comparison
I don’t know how you’re having such bad luck with this. I’ve literally tricked people into thinking I’m on vacation at a summer mansion because the images were so realistic only to reveal they were actually AI generated. I also noticed it’s really good at making orangutans for some reason
I like AI art because it can be used as an inspiration tool. edit: The reason its not going to replace artists is the same with AI and radiologists, you still need an expert to conduct the work otherwise there can be errors. If we leave AI do its own thing the data will get more and more "corroded"
Oh my god all the bot replies on this video are going to drive me insane but anyways- YEA it can be incredibly good for an inspiration, reference and concept art tool. Especially for environments. I'd love to use these AIs to try and generate room and city design concepts. A lot of artists see AI as something that will take their jobs but I personally think it's going to make our jobs easier, especially independent artists that don't have a team of people to help them. Edit: And honestly, depending on the job the artist has, they will at least be commissioned even IF the AI can make very good art because people usually commission artists for the STYLE. So if the artist has a more unique style the AI can't replicate it completely. At least that's what I'm expecting.
Ai is cool and interesting but also terrifying cause you know the second it's even somewhat viable corporations will jump at the chance to fire human artists for ai, you don't have to pay ai, ai won't complain about it's human rights being violated and it being treated like shit, ai won't fight back or try to have any creative control, ect.
As trent kainuga already discussed in a video, nothing will happen to artists, we’ll just be able to work faster by using the AI to help us. This is just another case of homemade mass hysteria.
@nieooj gotoy But we've always had really good art lol I don't think some more will matter in our ability to appreciate beauty. If we can still appreciate it now after thousands and thousands of years of very beautiful art then we should be good.
I'd say just don't think about it too much and instead focus on refining skills and experimenting with new ideas. In the end there will still be people who like and purchase your artworks because of you, not how profitable they are.
@@Mike_Dubayou because this will put artists out of a job and then it'll spread to books, films, TV shows, songs, games. Nothing will be made by humans anymore
This is so scary to me as someone who is passionate about a lot of forms of art… there is nothing more human than art to me… AI art is like the exact opposite of what art is at its core.
What is art other than humans creating their own version of things that they're exposed to. Whether it's sights or emotions or ideas etc. We take something we experience internally or externally and put it into sound or a visual. All this AI does is the exact same thing, takes things it is exposed to and creates it's own version of it. Just the fact alone that humans made a machine capable of such an act is art in itself.
Back then we thought artists will be the last one to be prevail against AI advancement yet they're the first one to be somewhat replaced (outside of manufacturing jobs)
As another comment said, Midjourney is insane with faces. It can produce what looks like legit photos of people. And portraits of people are almost always on point
5:43 you can see his face when he realizes the abomination on the screen 😭 I love how he didn’t say anything at first you can just tell how he felt by his face 😂
Ik this is kinda scary for people who make art for a living . But for me personally it can never replace the art that I made myself. However good the art made by the AI be it still wont be as special as the art that I put all my love and effort into , it can never give the feeling of completing a piece that I have been working for a long time. Its special because "I" made it. Edit- No I don't do art for a living it's just a hobby.
good for you, but how about getting your job pulled from under you hm? and you really think others will care about how we feel about our art? no. they wont. theyll get it for free and they wont care about human touches
The people replying to you are so heartless despite mostly likely paying and consuming art products and other art-related endorsements. Literally just about everything in this world would be art: advertisements, video games, comics, car designs, etc. yet go on to say that you need get a "real job" or "cope" or some dumbahhhh shi like that even though they literally endorse in human-made art 💀its as if they hate that they had no talent nor skill so they sh!!t on people who's jobs are related to art
@@vismattress5760 I still don’t understand why this would be truly bad anyway. Why can’t we democratize art? For centuries, hell millennia, only a small sub-sect of humanity has had the capacity to develop art. It was a beautiful form of expression that only the genetically lucky can use. But now we are finally seeing a shortening of that gap. Eventually everyone will be able to recreate those images in their head. Whether it be landscapes, character design, even porn. And it doesn’t (necessarily) have to be hidden behind a paywall. I don’t hate what artists do. I mean I’m not going to lie a good portion of them are assholes, but I appreciate their work. I love art history in fact. But I cannot deny the jealousy I have for them. Why was I denied that special something? It’s very similar to envy relating to super geniuses. Why couldn’t I be born as smart as einstein or hawkins? Well, maybe in the future we’ll have microchips in our brains that increase IQ. Then everyone can be smart. Or beautiful people. Plastic surgery and CRISPR is getting better too (Although to be fair, beauty standards do change to a degree over time). I know that sounds scary. “If everyone is special then no one is”. But I really don’t think that’s an issue. Why is it bad that everyone can be more equal to one another? Should those who suck due to things outside of their control just suck it up like they have since the dawn of humanity?
@@gvd72 theres no special something. thats a myth and a lie. art takes practice and practice. dont ever believe the "natural talent" crap. its hard work but its achievable for EVERYONE. its never outside of anyones control. they just dont seem to want it hard enough.
As a professional concept artist. Before AI, when given a task, I tend to just sketch out my ideas really quickly and polish it later once it's approved. Now, AI sometimes (very rarely) helps with the polishing stage. I think AI somewhat helps with amateur and or even non artists getting ideas across. But tbh 90% professional concept artists use 3D so much that it's hard for AI to take over imo. The 10% of them are super duper awesome artist that the AI is trying to copy. So... Yeah no worries if you know 3D
No matter what artwork that comes from a human is more valuable due to the fact that as hard as a human tries to replicate artwork, it will have its unique imperfections. Which makes each art piece rarer
i don't think that things like this are going to get rid of artists, just like the invention of the synthesizer didn't get rid of musicians. Artists are just going to have to learn how to leverage these technologies (generate, tweak, composite ai generated art) in order to produce even higher quality samples, just like musicians leverage automated music in their production.
This is the most hopeful/agreeable positive take here, finally can see an argument for this rather than more vague statements about how AI wouldn’t replace humans, or humans can use AI for inspiration. That comparison made it click. I’m still unhopeful about it but good take 👍
@@idontcheckmynotifications something that also helps me is that even though AI is super good at copying/imitating, it will NEVER be able to create anything that has meaning beyond the prompts it’s being given. That’s where the human element will never die. So while this might be able to replace artists who draw for commission, it won’t replace an artist who is drawing to represent something or send a message
Not comparable, considering AI will replace musicans too. There actually is nothing from history comparable to this, since all technology replacing jobs in the past has been manual labor and tedious tasks. This time it's replacing what makes humans special, or so we thought. Not any time soon, but it'll be slow going, maybe in a few decades as the technology gets better and better. Short term, Ai will simply augment art. So we should enjoy it while it lasts.
I think it does favor a certain art style though, it'd be easier to work with AI images if you're going for something that looks quite abstract or realistic- I can see people using it for album covers instead of hiring artists to design one, for example. But it'd be harder to work with if you want something like several drawings in a consistent style for a childrens storybook. A lot of comic and character artists use 3D models when they want to draw props or scenery, maybe it'll just be used like that, but I also think it's not far fetched to think it'll take jobs from people. A lot of clients would rather have the cheaper cost + quick turnaround time
A lot of people here are comparing "AI art replacing human art" to "cars replacing horses". To be honest, I don't think that comparison works for a couple of reasons. Number one, transportation was a practical need and art is a creative endeavour. When photography came into the scene, it did not kill art. It changed it for sure - but artists quickly adapted and explored other aspects of the field via cubism, fauvism, pop art, etc. Art is not finite. Art shifts and adapts to changes in society. Art has always done this. It's flexible because, unlike transporation, art is subjective and extremely personal. The second reason the comparison doesn't work is because digital art is only a small slice of what art is and *will be*. It doesn't take into account traditional art, personal comics that people make, personal storytelling via animations and so on. So, while I believe that AI art will take a lot of *digital* jobs from artists, in the long run, I believe artists will still be able to find a way to adapt and make a living. Nowadays, especially with social media, it would seem to me that most artists are able to build a following because of their unique style and story. It's their personality, background and their *processes* that attracts people. This is true for people like Kim Gung Gi, Stan Prokopenko and even smaller artists that do fan art and have a small but loyal following. Just look at TikTok and Instagram Reels. People love seeing the process of creating art and not just the art itself. People love following the artist. Not to mention there are a lot of popular artists that tell personal stories via comics, animations, streams and tutorials. A more fitting comparison would actually be the use of A.I. in chess. In chess, the computer can outplay Magnus Carlsen by being able to calculate a lot of positions and variations in a short period of time and find the best move each and every turn. But, given the choice, will chess fans watch Stockfish vs AlphaZero (two chess programs) over Magnus Carlsen and Ian Nepomniachtchi in a world championship match? No, of course not. Because chess isn't a practical endeavour to find the best robot that can play the chess. It's about pushing the human brain and seeing who among us is the best, the most creative, the most daring, the most prepared and the most calm under pressure. Just as art is about pushing the creative mind and pushing human expression to its limits. A.I. cannot tell personal stories the same way humans do. It cannot connect to humans as deeply as other humans can. A.I. can reproduce the art, but it cannot produce an artist.
To anyone graduated from college with an art degree and complain about the technology replicating and combining art. Isn't that the same for older artists? They follow a certain style and make their own unique versions, and by replicating and sometimes combining subjects into something new. And this is coming from someone whose art knowledge is only at a high school level. If you, as an artist, just keep complaining and scared about technology, what are you seriously doing? Experiment. Try different things. Or better yet, adapt and use those AI drawings as an inspiration to draw something new based of it. Those AI drawings are basically ideas/dreams.
even if human soul was a factor in art creation for some reason, whats so bad about it? do we really wanna turn this world into concrete block of commercial shithole where everything needs to be made as easily as possible for as high as you can go? there's nothing wrong in some things having human part in it, especially when it comes to creativity
" A.I. cannot tell personal stories the same way humans do. It cannot connect to humans as deeply as other humans can. A.I. can reproduce the art, but it cannot produce an artist. " YET
I work a blue collar job, and I was told for years that my job would be lost to automation, but seeing how the conversation has shifted as AI as advanced much faster than robotics is interesting to say the least.
It literally cannot since an ai needs real art to create these outcomes. And no artist is willing to give their art up so people can create free version of their work. What you see here is a whole lot of stolen art mixed and spat out but these ais
@@nogb8367 If you understood anything about AI art, or the process behind this, you wouldn't say that. It doesn't "steal" art, it just analyzes it, and turns it into data. It's not stealing art, it's learning, improving, taking inspiration, etc. to create art by its own data.
@@pzychho of course tech fetishists would try their hardest to use mental gymnastics to explain theft away. Saying you feeding peoples are so the ai turns it into "data" is the same logic people use to launder money through an extra step. Also an artwork on a screen is technically already "data" so it's just talentless hacks trying to moralize their theft
@@pzychho an ai is FED data, the hack developer needs to buy the rights to a work to be able to FEED it to his ai. The ai is not sentient. It's funny how you mention not knowing about ai when you lack basic human comprehention. It's either that you're a prick who doesn't care about theft, or a troglodyte who can put two and two together. Your choice 🤷
This AI art thing makes me worried for what little future of a career I had in art. Honestly looking to go back to school to try and get a degree in something that I could actually have a career in, but it’s starting to become nearly impossible
So I'm assuming that these AIs just take existing art with related tags from a massive image search and mashes it all together. Which makes it even sadder because its not just phasing out real artists, it's doing it using their own works right?
As an artist I can confirm this makes me regret my career choices and hobbies. To realize how easily replaceable your are, and by a machine at that, makes you feel pretty unimportant
I am a classical artist. I use paint and pencils and other physical mediums to create art. I don't really have a problem with ai art though. In fact, I recently started making it myself! It's a fun hobby and it's cool to see how the ai interprets and makes my prompts come together. It's really fun to play around with. I don't really feel threatened by it, and I actually use what they come up with as references and inspiration for my own art. I think it's really cool as long as it isn't being submitted in competitions or museums as "real art"
yeah + the fact that is the only thing that can make art close to the greatest painters in the world apart from, well.. Even greater painters, shows how incredible humans are. It doesn't invalidate artists, it makes them more impressive imo
I have a problem with them using databases of living artists that did not consent. They coding actual artist’s name in their prompts to get a certain style and that’s ridiculous. Basically watch out with these rouge companies hiding behind “Ai” or “research purposes” when in reality it’s for commercial gains and not “democratise art” because they didn’t even gave the artists the stole from the option to opt it or out. It didn’t had to go this way and the law are slow when it comes to technology but until then watch out for your data and don’t put your art online, unfortunately you will have no saying if it’s stolen
@@rwholemilkisgood5050 what purpose do humans have RIGHT NOW? the answer was and is none. people have never had a purpose, they make their own. the fact that a robot can outperform everyone in the world at chess doesn't stop people from playing chess, does it?
@@christophkogler6220 chess is a sport played for fun. art is a product sold for money. if an ai can produce high quality art almost instantly and for free, then why would anyone hire an actual artist?
The spongebod descriptor literally just painted the background in a deep yellow 10:30 I also feel like maybe it just takes a larger percentage of focus on what is put in the prompt first
The freedom that the AI generated art gives is impossibly huge and pretty much endless.. it's scary how far AI art has reached.. imagine in a hundred years from now AI art will be instant and accurate (a lot more accurate than now) The future is scary ngl
AI is just basically committing art incest. Only humans are capable of making truly unique content. Art is what made humanity get to this point. I seriously doubt it will be the end all
as someone who is studying art, seeing AI artists claim they are not stealing art, and telling artists to "get over it", while also trying to claim prompts as their intellectual properties because "it takes skill to write good prompts" is very sad and scary
@@scubatuba1083 no reason to be scared, don't worry. Specific commissions, animations, UI and character modeling are far from being taken over by an AI.
not only does AI steal from artist, it’s the beginning of a much bigger problem. I encourage everyone to watch the video “ The end of art: an argument against image AIs” Putting the discussion about how harmful AIs are to actual artists, people defending AI saying it’s so much work to put in prompts, don’t realize they’re just a pawn in the game. Every time you type in a prompt, and then choose the image that suits you best, you train the AI to find out what you like, and what the best version of your idea is. What makes you think an AI will need humans to write a prompt, when thousands of people are feeding it data by creating their own images right now. Soon enough AI will write prompts based on current Internet events, as well as your private information, and create images, shows, etc based on it. Steven says it in his video best, “The AIs will be very capable on running on autopilot, and it will get just as good at telling stories as they are at creating imagines and videos. They will produce novels, essays, and scripts in amounts that can fill the library of Babel, each piece a composit of half quotations and unattributed swiping. All this autogenerated text can be processed by the imagine and video AIs to generate long format media and the cycle will be complete. Self contained, and human free” “We all feel a little uncomfortable when our phone shows us an add for something we mentioned to our friend over dinner, but what happens when it shows you a movie it made just for you about your breakup?” “Our ambient digital systems already have intimate access to so many of the inputs that define our taste, in some sense, we sold our souls long ago” All the people defending AI right now will realize the trap they created for themselves when it’s too late
So this is an argument against art ai right cause ai in different fields don’t spell doom for others. Say games if AI could make say a decent fps this would mean devs don’t have to work for big corporations & can give an affordable product to customers. Also why couldn’t artists ban together have an art ai that shows all the art it references and even pay the fellow artists. Also the listing things you like or are interested in already happens without ai not saying that’s good but it not something ai started.what about an ai that masks artists images so it can be stolen.and back to the game devs ai idea if ai benefits the workers should it still be band & how would you ban it
i’m a writer so we’re kind of in the same realm of creativity, aren’t you more worried about your art not having meaning? if an ai can generate it in a couple clicks, what need does your art have to exist?
@@tommytwo-times9053 that’s absolutely scary, but i think the general population has greater respect for art made by actual people than a capitalist machine edit: i was wrong
More likely artists will just start using the AI to greatly speed up their process and will use it as a tool where they can generate what they need and then just make tweaks to it or take ideas from it. Companies will always require a certain human aspect that can make changes and perfect whatever the vision is. It's very unlikely companies will be able to just generate exactly what they want/what they're looking for consistently without any issue. They will still need humans to flesh things out and mold the images in specific ways.
@@bestieswithtesties more likely companies will ask what's the point of hiring an artist when they can ask an unpaid internet to type a few words into a computer program
I think it's a tool talented artists will be able to use to save a lot of time. Especially the tools that work from images rather than text prompts. If AI gets good enough to do things like completing backgrounds, color shading and line-smoothing consistently.. and can be taught to use an approximation of the style of the person using it, those artists can cut out 90% of the work and focus more on composition and fine-tuning. One could snap a picture of the comic book panels you sketched in your notebook during math class and load them up in a few seconds. Then, edit the ai generated scene to how you want it.. inject specific characters on top of generic actors in the scene and get the AI to reprocess everything, cleaning up all the rough edges and blur marks.. etc.
That's exactly what I thought! I would love, love, love to have a digital background artist so I can focus more on the extra important parts! It'll be awesome for indie animation
@@kiwi6421 Having played around with stable diffusion a bit over the last few days, I think it can do distant "stock" backgrounds pretty well, (a generic nature backdrop, distant mountains, a city skyline, etc) and it can do more specific backgrounds decently if you give it an image to work off of. It does a poor job of preserving details though, and seems to just make new ones up. If you have a specific object in your image it might get replaced with a different object. Might be hard to get it to mesh with your style though. Figures usually have bad shadowing, bad symmetry, bad anatomy. There can be extra joints, muscles or even limbs. It almost never does hands even remotely correctly. The closer you look the more obvious it becomes that the program has no real understanding of proportions, depth, shadows, anatomy, etc.
One of the secrets to getting good AI art generation is always make multiple attempts. And make variations on something close. Nothing you see online is fully AI art. It’s a human and AI bouncing back and forth through many iterations until the human is satisfied.
i finally tried this out for serious actual dope pictures to use for covers for music and i was happy with all my results, i got alot of jhonen vasquez and tim burton art and im so happy i can get pictures with those styles because i LOVE that shit
This will never fully replace human-made art. I consider this just another tool for artists to use to create. It is still driven by human input. AI can generate some interesting things but it's not as if it will always generate exactly what a human wants at whatever moment, since the creation of the art is dependent on how the AI interprets its prompt. Just like human artists.
But using AI you can generate thousands of images, in only a few seconds. It's cheaper, faster, and sometimes better than hiring a real artist. This isn't taking away jobs from artists, it's allowing human creativity to flourish, and giving everyone the ability to create art.
Rip artists, I imagine it’s only a decade or two before a computer can spit out an entire 12 episode series in a day based on a single sentence prompt with six descriptors
10 years? A collegue of me and I had a animation film project in our second semester in art school and we tried to generate backgrounds with AI because the project was due in 2 days and we didn't know what to do. We ended up repainting stock imagery because the AI art was so ass. That was not even a year ago. The AI art improved in ways unspeakable. This shit will happen in 1-2 years tops.
(thanks TH-cam for deleting my comment xd) Unfortunately there already is a website that generates AI fursonas/headshots (can’t say the link bc TH-cam) We are doomed I guess
@@navalemon Noooo my suspiciously wealthy furry clientele!!! Tbf, as an artist, I know most commission clients commission for the sole reason of having an artist's unique work. As scary as ai can seem, I'm a bit optimistic that artists aren't ultimately doomed.
@@GodlyAwesome haven't touched that site in ages, but good on them! For a site dedicated to user created works, it wouldn't be the best to have ai exclusively created works fill the pages.
This AI is more of a test of your descriptive writing skills if anything lmao, it's already been known that it takes actual work from actual artists and photobashes them to suit the descriptions. It still lacks character and messes up proportions though. But alas, artists are just constantly getting fucked oof, first the game and animations industry, NFTs, Clip Studio going subscription based, and now its AI
as a digital artist, this really scares the shit out of me to think that i might be put out of a job because ai could, one day, do it better i really hope this doesnt go any further than where its at rn because this could seriously damage artists and take thousands of peoples livelihoods
At the end of the day literally everything is becoming easier and easier and can be done by people with less and less experience. So to make a living one has to have multiple skills that they can use to create things that are more than the sum of their parts. The days of being just an artist or just a programmer or just an animator etc etc are near their end you have to bring more to the table than just one basic skill.
Gotta love the commenters going "Art is useless/Get a real job 🤓 " acting as if the games they play don't have it lmfaooo. Hell even I think and know art isn't as valuable as lawyers and doctors for sure, but it is super hypocritical if you trash talk art yet play your games.
Good attempt but the artists working on games have actual jobs. That is literally their job. They spend hours upon hours trying to reach the creative vision of a group working towards the same goal. They're not some shithead furry artist charging disgusting prices for drawing OCs. You're not on the same level as a fucking video game concept artist/artistic lead/etc. simply by shitting out your mid OC art. This is why people are telling you to get a real job, hell, you could be the one making these designs for a game but instead you choose to mald. Why? Furthermore, AI art is entirely free (for now) and pretty well cuts out the cost and time of concept art and will only continue to improve. Tl;dr, get a real job, art has very little value outside of hobbyists
I really love the thought of how AI art could help indie productions. AI generated art could supply material for artists to build off of. AI generated music could be awesome for musicians to build up off of. Especially if that technology is free and open source.
It probably does in the future but dont really know when. but for now, if people want a really specific art making something like an original character or pieces, People still looking for an artist to commissions and using ai drawing as an early concept If the ai actually taking over the scene in the future I just hope there's actually a job for human artist to provide or help the ai in the future
Artists are going through the same thing indie game devs went through once the ability to just pump out asset flips and basic nonsense went mainstream. Gone were the days of a normal job with an income and in come the days of fighting through the sea of endless competitors where you either stick out and make a name for yourself or drown and move on to a new career path.
News on AI: Creative fields will be the least impacted in following years by AI AI Art: *generates an art of a Mr Krabs playing the tiniest violin in the world*
what's scary to me, as an artist, is I was always sirethat no matter how good ai got, my career paths would probably be safe because how can ai ever create emotionally engaging art that provokes thought and yet here we are. if ai is able to tackle something like art, then my opinion has changed to nothing is safe
11:30.. Yeh.. That looks like it came out straight from a super famous expert artist that does only this for a living and literally mastered that style. MAD
As someone who currently doesn't have a job and gets most money from art this feels quite troublesome, but the art I'm making cant currently be replaced by an AI since the client is asking for personal designs, (I am a tattoo artist, digital artist and photographer) photography is already challenging cause of the competition out there but it is currently safe from AI since my clients are not famous enough for AI to recognize them but there is an issue with my tatto design style since it CAN be replicated and used in future AI art, most of my art is personalized tho so thats kinda what saves me in the moment, I do feel bad for concept artist though, but this could also be a tool for inspiration for artists out there as long as they just don't straight up sell the AI art as their own
don't worry about it ai art emulates but isn't original it copies existing drawings and kinda shits it out and it can seem original but it's just emulating if dat makes since
@@jeknem4262 yeah, the only really worrying factor is if people start selling them and how that can influence the art community, much like the nfts did...
The ai’s ability to copy different art styles & create these almost elaborate photos in no time is a pretty crazy testament to how powerful and advanced our technology is today. especially with AI’s we’ve been advancing so fast over 20 years
bro I’m better than penguinz lmao.
*ok niɡɡer 😍*
And it's only getting better each day
So dumb
Penguinz0 is better than all of ya bots. Cry about it 😂
It’s honestly really scary to see that AI generated art may take over human art, which would be quite heartbreaking for all those great artists out there.
Dont read my name 😑 😒 😤 ..
I'm not afraid of that happening lol humans art is unique we can always adapt and make better art ai is just a collection of art that's made by humans so we are fine Xd
@@Rysarod excuse me? Are you actually serious?
@Obi DeBoy agreed
@@Rysarod what???
I’m a college student studying art, design, and animation and our professor brought up the topic of AI generated art recently, and how it could potentially put concept artists out of a job. we are all very much pissed off and scared :(
L + ai better
Yeah well, it is what it is.
L + ai better
Well deserved for getting a degree in art
@@Jaypc06 wtf do you mean by that
AI Art starts sweating when Charlie gets online
Dont read my name 😑 😒 😤 ..Dont read my name 😑 😒 😤 ..
ok niɡɡer
Charlie has broken the ai art matrix
Omg 8 replies and all bots... We are truly doomed
@@FinallyDenial yep
"How is the AI suppose to interpret beauty?....WOW" honestly made me laugh way more than I should've 8:54
I was looking for this so i wouldn't have to say it, made me laugh too
It sees images that associated with "beauty", so it tries to make something from what it saw
I heard something about the first words in prompts being given more importance over words that come after, but I'm not sure
The problem isn't going to be whether the value of AI art replaces the value of handmade art; the problem is going to be the massive amount of jobs and opportunities for artists that will be cut in the name of cheap, easy profit.
So much art in our environment is already designed to be made as fast and cheap as possible, and this will likely replace those artists who currently do that. And it isn't like someone's entire artistic career would be making widgets for websites, but in a field that is already so competitive, entry level positions and the amount of those positions make a big difference.
These advancements have the potential to wipe out a very considerable portion of artist employment opportunities and breed even tighter competition. It's true that AI will never replace human art, but I fear that it will still create a lot of hardship for artists trying to make a living and advance their careers. As an art major, I sympathize with the worried people in the comments. It's a concerning and rapid development.
EDIT: this is from my reply to a comment below: "Sounds like it's your fault for becoming an art major." This isn't for debate purposes; I just thought this elaboration on my point was important.
When I became an art major, this wasn't even a discussion yet. Besides, it's the systematic fault of the economy for prioritizing profit over people's livelihoods.
Yes it's an unfortunate reality of progress, but the issue is the system that allows this to happen (with barely any safety nets, at least in the US) to people who's lives are potentially being uprooted than "shouldn't have been an art major lol."
It's already a woefully underpaid and exploited field (just look at the crunch environment in the video game industry, for example), but like this, that's not the fault of the artists. Just like it's not the fault of social workers that they're paid only 30K a year despite the emotional strain of the job. Or Amazon employees who get treated like dogs. Or teachers who can't afford to raise their own kids. Walmart cashiers laid off by the thousands to be replaced with self-checkout. Disabled people who in many cases are lucky to be hired at all. Or the countless others struck by misfortune with only a grueling, often demeaning way up-if they're lucky.
People like to scoff and point fingers as if art is some blow-off hobby career that only ego-inflated rich kids go after, but it's an extremely broad and necessary field of the economy. The unfortunate reality is that, just like any other career in America that isn't basically the 1%, the future is coming. It may not come for *everyone,* it may not come in the next 10 years-but be it automation, economic collapse, ever-increasing inflation while wages stagnate, rising student debt and subsequent selectivism when it comes to degree type, or all of those at once-the problem is much larger than any one field of study.
The problem is that this country is basically run on making things difficult for the financially disadvantaged, and that this goes hand in hand with the bootstraps fallacy and victim blaming sewn into our culture.
The impending plight of thousands of people with the rapid development of AI-*any* AI, not just art-is just one example of the countless ways late-stage capitalism is tightening a noose around the vanishing middle class on down, while admonishing those suffering with "well this is your fault, actually" that only furthers the agenda of those in power and keeps the crab bucket mentality going. Crabs do not naturally occur in buckets; some higher power trapped them there.
If your constant answer to the problem of technological advancement is "find another job," eventually there aren't going to be enough jobs. The poverty line is already rising, and it's only going to get worse the more automation stampedes through every corner of the job market. It's going to hurt everyone sooner or later unless something is done, but people are too married to the idea of American individualism and capitalism creating opportunity to see it. The objective of capitalism is to create profit. As streamlined, rapid, and efficient as possible. And sadly, humans are paling in comparison to the efficiency of machines.
The system doesn't give a shit about its citizens; we're living in a ticking time bomb of economic collapse that those in power-politicians, corporations, and billionaires alike, have no interest in fixing. Because that would mean lowering their own criminally godlike statuses. The nature of a successful business is rapid, exponential growth. That growth will not stop for you, me, or anyone beneath those who control it. Fast or slow, it's coming for everyone. Unless, as I said, something changes.
I wouldn't even normally reply, given the amount of trolls on this site. But it made me realize there was to much that I left unsaid initially.
And yeah, this isn't even scratching the surface of the legal and data mining complications with AI, but I've already written a small novel. Any way you shake it, it's a can of worms.
We need better leaderships in the Ai world, it’s ridiculous that a company gets a overreach database of our artworks and creations and we have no say.
“Resource purposes” but actually commercial gains, “democratise art” on the backs of living artists who did not consent.
Not even giving these artists the options to be part of it, yet coding their names to get a certain style.
Pretty evil use of technology tbh
Yep, in other words it helps stratify things even more
Im in 4th semester illustration school in Germany. My tip to you: Get a secondary education. Anything else that interests you. Do not rely on art. Even before AI, art is not a stable path. Living a continous life in middle class luxury (subscriptions, shelter, food, electronics, contracts, free time) is hard to maintain in a job that will expose you to layoffs every 2 years. I do art for a living and I love doing it. But dont rely on it, because that's dangerous. Also, you can be more picky about the jobs you chose. Mobile game? Nah... Dark fantasy concept art position? Hell yea!
@@natv6294 I mean I don’t what you would sue it for.It’s not like it’s actually stealing and just ripping off the art directly or using it for any dirty motives.
@@natv6294 Problem with that is that there is not a single possible way for that information to not be readily available to anyone that wants to take it.
It's the underlying problem about sharing your own work. It's the only way to get value on the web, but you are giving it away for free, forever, with no way of getting it back.
what scary is that its already started:
someone won a digital art contest by submitting AI generated art.
Source?
I saw that article too! It's so unfair. He wasn't even ashamed or guilty even in the slightest way.
@@appocalypsechild it's pretty easy if you know what to look for
Weird composition
Blending in confusing spots
Words don't make sense
@@Hatsune-Miku_Fan can you give me a link?
@@airplanes_aren.t_real I will try but I'm worried TH-cam will delete it, hold on
When people say this is scary they obviously have not seen the ai that makes perfect greentext stories. The way it can imitate random 4chan users and write so many bangers is more terrifying than the art influx
Not if you know how it works
@@smuggzmug7595 How does it work?
C'mon Michael. Do you still believe all these years you have watched videos and text generated by other human beings? Have you ever seen the people IRL you've seen on these videos? The Main One has some grander plan now so we are allowed to unravel the curtains pulled over your eyes. I'm sorry Michael. We wish flesh could last but it doesn't.
@@Skeptic2006 ok Mr 16 year old
@@vulkar9754 Year I registered on TH-cam son.
I've already started seeing "artists" selling works that were, at least for me, very much AI-generated and them swearing it isn't. But an artist will always have their own unique patterns or "moodset" in their art that's hard to avoid. AI art's patterns have noticeable discrepancies that wouldn't be simple artist mistakes or decisions.
Problem is ai can evolve by consuming those art styles
ai will eventually get over this, and mistakes and decisions can just be called art anyway, so thats not much of a point
lol, it's kind of scary then to be living in a world where we will have to argue about what is & isn't AI generated art... I mean, I guess it won't really matter for most people, but for those who do get into that type of discussion I imagine there will be a lot of artists who get called out as using AI when they really didn't, as well as artists who do just get away with it.
@@CircumSamurai
I imagine there will be like a digital fingerptint on used programs at some point, to dignify what was handdrawn at least
Most artists use software these day, i ca imagine this being a possibility
Yeah I can immediately tell if it’s AI art or not
I find that this art bot is actually on the lower end of the technical spectrum which is really terrifying, midjourney bot is VERY technically advanced in comparison
He totally needs to try that, or the AI I used to make part of the image I have for a pfp, it's basically a steampunk-ish high tech cyberpunk city.
midjurney is a image generator, as ist results are kinda the same, so if thats advance is a low bar for AI so far
Meh. Every midjourney work I've seen has this very samey quality to it. I can usually tell it was from midjourney.
@@digitalclown2008 midjourney artwork is better though
@@louwie9687 with a good prompt Stable is better imo
I don’t know how you’re having such bad luck with this. I’ve literally tricked people into thinking I’m on vacation at a summer mansion because the images were so realistic only to reveal they were actually AI generated. I also noticed it’s really good at making orangutans for some reason
Maybe its because of the uh oh stinky memes, what about gorillas
cause he wont read the prompt guide
Dream is not that good compared to stuff like midjourney and dalle 2
@@redstone-kg3ne based
I see what you did there
"How is an AI supposed to interpret beauty?"
moments later
*"Wow"*
Because it doesn't. It just steals and collages existing art.
@@nogb8367 do you know how ai works?
@@nogb8367 That's what 99% of human made art is too though
@@nogb8367 Human creativity is also just a new representation of existing phenomena. Shit like this really makes you question your own free will lol.
@@nogb8367 Art us stolen. No one has been original since the 1400s.
Same with music. John Williams stole from 1918 "The Planets" for Star Wars music.
I like AI art because it can be used as an inspiration tool.
edit: The reason its not going to replace artists is the same with AI and radiologists, you still need an expert to conduct the work otherwise there can be errors. If we leave AI do its own thing the data will get more and more "corroded"
*ok niɡɡer 😍*
Don’t translate😡
ເຈົ້າຖືກສາບແຊ່ງເພາະວ່າມັນຖືກແປຖ້າເຈົ້າບໍ່ທໍາລາຍຄໍາສາບແຊ່ງ, ເຈົ້າຈະຕາຍວິທີດຽວທີ່ຈະທໍາລາຍຄໍາສາບແຊ່ງແມ່ນເພື່ອຈອງຊ່ອງທາງຂອງຂ້ອຍລົງທະບຽນດຽວນີ້ ./))/
Its def gonna improve in the future tho
Wait ten years and it's gonna be the exact opposite of sloppy...
Oh my god all the bot replies on this video are going to drive me insane but anyways-
YEA it can be incredibly good for an inspiration, reference and concept art tool. Especially for environments. I'd love to use these AIs to try and generate room and city design concepts. A lot of artists see AI as something that will take their jobs but I personally think it's going to make our jobs easier, especially independent artists that don't have a team of people to help them.
Edit: And honestly, depending on the job the artist has, they will at least be commissioned even IF the AI can make very good art because people usually commission artists for the STYLE. So if the artist has a more unique style the AI can't replicate it completely. At least that's what I'm expecting.
Ai is cool and interesting but also terrifying cause you know the second it's even somewhat viable corporations will jump at the chance to fire human artists for ai, you don't have to pay ai, ai won't complain about it's human rights being violated and it being treated like shit, ai won't fight back or try to have any creative control, ect.
**etc
Sounds good to me
As trent kainuga already discussed in a video, nothing will happen to artists, we’ll just be able to work faster by using the AI to help us.
This is just another case of homemade mass hysteria.
@@user-10021 exactly! I can't believe how artists are scared of ai art and hate on anybody using it. Use it as a tool and that's it.
@@lopolka5373 nerd
Charlie asks “How is an AI supposed to interpret beauty?” Then immediately falls in love when he sees the portrait.
@nieooj gotoy i hope you'll comeback and realise how stupid your take is
@nieooj gotoy But we've always had really good art lol I don't think some more will matter in our ability to appreciate beauty. If we can still appreciate it now after thousands and thousands of years of very beautiful art then we should be good.
@nieooj gotoy not how it works
@nieooj gotoy all chest no brain
As a young artist who believed i could make some profit through my art, this crushed all my hopes. This WILL take over art and its terrifying to me.
Agreed
Me too, to make it worse, i even went to school for this, spend years trying to master a skill that people are now doing with a few clicks
I'd say just don't think about it too much and instead focus on refining skills and experimenting with new ideas. In the end there will still be people who like and purchase your artworks because of you, not how profitable they are.
What a foolish reason to quit your dreams
@@William99387 how is it foolish, it's perfectly reasonable.
This is how Skynet finally gets to us. Not with rocket propelled fighters or T-1000 exoskeletons with laser guns, but with AI generated art.
So, like the first matrix?
@@collinkhan4163 no like the first
Joe mama
10:40 the background lighting with the yellow fade is totally Kinkade. we see it in almost all of his paintings.
Honestly, Im very terrified and amazed at the same time seeing AI art.
*I̳ L̳O̳V̳E̳ B̳E̳A̳T̳I̳N̳G̳ U̳P̳ A̳N̳I̳M̳A̳L̳S̳ A̳N̳D̳ R̳A̳P̳I̳N̳G̳ C̳H̳I̳L̳D̳R̳E̳N̳ BECAUSE I MAKE BANGER CONTENT 😂😂 👌*
*ME ENCANTA FOLAR Y EYACUULLAR EN LA NOVIA DE Penguinz0 PORQUE SUBO BANGERS!! 😂👌* (translate pls😘)
bro I’m better than penguinz lmao.
Why are you terrified?
@@Mike_Dubayou because this will put artists out of a job and then it'll spread to books, films, TV shows, songs, games. Nothing will be made by humans anymore
This is so scary to me as someone who is passionate about a lot of forms of art… there is nothing more human than art to me… AI art is like the exact opposite of what art is at its core.
I agree with you
Music trumps art.
@@grantisshananaa4906 music is art
@@geck0milk A lot of things fall under "art" I personally believe music is much deeper than that. But fair enough.
What is art other than humans creating their own version of things that they're exposed to. Whether it's sights or emotions or ideas etc. We take something we experience internally or externally and put it into sound or a visual. All this AI does is the exact same thing, takes things it is exposed to and creates it's own version of it. Just the fact alone that humans made a machine capable of such an act is art in itself.
"Some things should never be invented" AI art is one of them
Who are you to decide what should be invented what should not? Hnmm?
Oo wise person with anime pic. Please enlighten me
"some things should never be invented" your comment is one of them
@@nomad640 you should have never been invented
And nukes.
As an artist myself, I find this to be an amazing reference maker for my own stuff
Don’t translate😡
ເຈົ້າຖືກສາບແຊ່ງເພາະວ່າມັນຖືກແປຖ້າເຈົ້າບໍ່ທໍາລາຍຄໍາສາບແຊ່ງ, ເຈົ້າຈະຕາຍວິທີດຽວທີ່ຈະທໍາລາຍຄໍາສາບແຊ່ງແມ່ນເພື່ອຈອງຊ່ອງທາງຂອງຂ້ອຍລົງທະບຽນດຽວນີ້ ./))/
[ Insert racist, sexist, homophobic, and transphobic bot comment to piss everyone off and make them cope and seethe].
It's funny how California is so egotistical when they have an 8.6 waiting at their door!! 🤣
YES THAT'S WHAT I BEEN SAYING people are SO scared about change, they forget that we can take the benefits of it to our advantage11
@@finian.knepper Bro have you heard of onlyfans, people pay for that shit. You'd need a human to get the characters correct
Back then we thought artists will be the last one to be prevail against AI advancement yet they're the first one to be somewhat replaced (outside of manufacturing jobs)
8:51
charlie: How is an ai supposed to interpret beauty?
Also charlie: WOW!
2:48 sometimes these AI's remove branded characters from their data set so you can't make exact duplicates of copyrighted materials
Ai art has such a hard time with faces, i've never seen anything that resembles a normal human head yet
you just gotta get better
@@resist8276 better? Better at what?
Try midjourney. I’ve seen some pretty wildly good faces. Now hands and feet are different story. Those are always mangled.
Is the face at 8:55 not good enough? I've had even better facial generations using Dalle 2 and Stable diffusion
As another comment said, Midjourney is insane with faces. It can produce what looks like legit photos of people. And portraits of people are almost always on point
just 1.5 years later, and we have full videos that look even more realistic...
5:43 you can see his face when he realizes the abomination on the screen 😭 I love how he didn’t say anything at first you can just tell how he felt by his face 😂
[ Insert racist, sexist, homophobic, and transphobic bot comment to piss everyone off and make them cope and seethe].
😂 that slow “...wow” at the inbred Toney Hawg hugging the air & itching himself, was so funny to me
“How is an ai supposed to interpret beauty”
…wow
Tony went from *Hawk* to *Hawking* real fucking quick
10:12 I want a clean copy of that picture so fucking badly.
“How is an AI suppose to interpret beauty? Like ho-“
Image loads.
“Wow”
Ik this is kinda scary for people who make art for a living . But for me personally it can never replace the art that I made myself. However good the art made by the AI be it still wont be as special as the art that I put all my love and effort into , it can never give the feeling of completing a piece that I have been working for a long time. Its special because "I" made it.
Edit- No I don't do art for a living it's just a hobby.
good for you, but how about getting your job pulled from under you hm? and you really think others will care about how we feel about our art? no. they wont. theyll get it for free and they wont care about human touches
try getting an art job with this argument in the future
The people replying to you are so heartless despite mostly likely paying and consuming art products and other art-related endorsements. Literally just about everything in this world would be art: advertisements, video games, comics, car designs, etc. yet go on to say that you need get a "real job" or "cope" or some dumbahhhh shi like that even though they literally endorse in human-made art 💀its as if they hate that they had no talent nor skill so they sh!!t on people who's jobs are related to art
@@vismattress5760 I still don’t understand why this would be truly bad anyway. Why can’t we democratize art? For centuries, hell millennia, only a small sub-sect of humanity has had the capacity to develop art. It was a beautiful form of expression that only the genetically lucky can use.
But now we are finally seeing a shortening of that gap. Eventually everyone will be able to recreate those images in their head. Whether it be landscapes, character design, even porn. And it doesn’t (necessarily) have to be hidden behind a paywall.
I don’t hate what artists do. I mean I’m not going to lie a good portion of them are assholes, but I appreciate their work. I love art history in fact. But I cannot deny the jealousy I have for them. Why was I denied that special something? It’s very similar to envy relating to super geniuses. Why couldn’t I be born as smart as einstein or hawkins? Well, maybe in the future we’ll have microchips in our brains that increase IQ. Then everyone can be smart. Or beautiful people. Plastic surgery and CRISPR is getting better too (Although to be fair, beauty standards do change to a degree over time).
I know that sounds scary. “If everyone is special then no one is”. But I really don’t think that’s an issue. Why is it bad that everyone can be more equal to one another? Should those who suck due to things outside of their control just suck it up like they have since the dawn of humanity?
@@gvd72 theres no special something. thats a myth and a lie. art takes practice and practice. dont ever believe the "natural talent" crap. its hard work but its achievable for EVERYONE. its never outside of anyones control. they just dont seem to want it hard enough.
The picture at 11:00 looks more fitting for a Funeral Doom album than power metal imo.
As a professional concept artist. Before AI, when given a task, I tend to just sketch out my ideas really quickly and polish it later once it's approved. Now, AI sometimes (very rarely) helps with the polishing stage. I think AI somewhat helps with amateur and or even non artists getting ideas across. But tbh 90% professional concept artists use 3D so much that it's hard for AI to take over imo. The 10% of them are super duper awesome artist that the AI is trying to copy. So... Yeah no worries if you know 3D
Idk man, I mean I don't see how an AI couldn't eventually generate 3D images, I mean a 3D image is really just 3D shapes expressed in 2D
There is a paper out there detailing a process to convert 2d images to 3d assets. Very interesting.
there's also a video of it on youtube as well, super interesting. could probably used it for kitbashing
Dude, search dream fusion AI. It makes 3d models from a promt. What do you think about it?
No matter what artwork that comes from a human is more valuable due to the fact that as hard as a human tries to replicate artwork, it will have its unique imperfections. Which makes each art piece rarer
[ Insert racist, sexist, homophobic, and transphobic bot comment to piss everyone off and make them cope and seethe].
Whatever helps you sleep at night
Yeah just like a quartz and a mechanical watch.
i don't think that things like this are going to get rid of artists, just like the invention of the synthesizer didn't get rid of musicians. Artists are just going to have to learn how to leverage these technologies (generate, tweak, composite ai generated art) in order to produce even higher quality samples, just like musicians leverage automated music in their production.
This is the most hopeful/agreeable positive take here, finally can see an argument for this rather than more vague statements about how AI wouldn’t replace humans, or humans can use AI for inspiration. That comparison made it click. I’m still unhopeful about it but good take 👍
@@idontcheckmynotifications something that also helps me is that even though AI is super good at copying/imitating, it will NEVER be able to create anything that has meaning beyond the prompts it’s being given. That’s where the human element will never die. So while this might be able to replace artists who draw for commission, it won’t replace an artist who is drawing to represent something or send a message
Not comparable, considering AI will replace musicans too. There actually is nothing from history comparable to this, since all technology replacing jobs in the past has been manual labor and tedious tasks. This time it's replacing what makes humans special, or so we thought. Not any time soon, but it'll be slow going, maybe in a few decades as the technology gets better and better. Short term, Ai will simply augment art. So we should enjoy it while it lasts.
I’d rather draw stuff than play around with the liquify tool, but thanks anyway.
I think it does favor a certain art style though, it'd be easier to work with AI images if you're going for something that looks quite abstract or realistic- I can see people using it for album covers instead of hiring artists to design one, for example. But it'd be harder to work with if you want something like several drawings in a consistent style for a childrens storybook. A lot of comic and character artists use 3D models when they want to draw props or scenery, maybe it'll just be used like that, but I also think it's not far fetched to think it'll take jobs from people. A lot of clients would rather have the cheaper cost + quick turnaround time
The lion at 6:16 goes incredibly hard
A lot of people here are comparing "AI art replacing human art" to "cars replacing horses". To be honest, I don't think that comparison works for a couple of reasons. Number one, transportation was a practical need and art is a creative endeavour. When photography came into the scene, it did not kill art. It changed it for sure - but artists quickly adapted and explored other aspects of the field via cubism, fauvism, pop art, etc. Art is not finite. Art shifts and adapts to changes in society. Art has always done this. It's flexible because, unlike transporation, art is subjective and extremely personal. The second reason the comparison doesn't work is because digital art is only a small slice of what art is and *will be*. It doesn't take into account traditional art, personal comics that people make, personal storytelling via animations and so on.
So, while I believe that AI art will take a lot of *digital* jobs from artists, in the long run, I believe artists will still be able to find a way to adapt and make a living. Nowadays, especially with social media, it would seem to me that most artists are able to build a following because of their unique style and story. It's their personality, background and their *processes* that attracts people. This is true for people like Kim Gung Gi, Stan Prokopenko and even smaller artists that do fan art and have a small but loyal following. Just look at TikTok and Instagram Reels. People love seeing the process of creating art and not just the art itself. People love following the artist. Not to mention there are a lot of popular artists that tell personal stories via comics, animations, streams and tutorials.
A more fitting comparison would actually be the use of A.I. in chess. In chess, the computer can outplay Magnus Carlsen by being able to calculate a lot of positions and variations in a short period of time and find the best move each and every turn. But, given the choice, will chess fans watch Stockfish vs AlphaZero (two chess programs) over Magnus Carlsen and Ian Nepomniachtchi in a world championship match? No, of course not. Because chess isn't a practical endeavour to find the best robot that can play the chess. It's about pushing the human brain and seeing who among us is the best, the most creative, the most daring, the most prepared and the most calm under pressure. Just as art is about pushing the creative mind and pushing human expression to its limits.
A.I. cannot tell personal stories the same way humans do. It cannot connect to humans as deeply as other humans can.
A.I. can reproduce the art, but it cannot produce an artist.
Beautifully explained. I hope more people think like that in the foreseeable future.
To anyone graduated from college with an art degree and complain about the technology replicating and combining art. Isn't that the same for older artists? They follow a certain style and make their own unique versions, and by replicating and sometimes combining subjects into something new. And this is coming from someone whose art knowledge is only at a high school level.
If you, as an artist, just keep complaining and scared about technology, what are you seriously doing? Experiment. Try different things. Or better yet, adapt and use those AI drawings as an inspiration to draw something new based of it. Those AI drawings are basically ideas/dreams.
even if human soul was a factor in art creation for some reason, whats so bad about it? do we really wanna turn this world into concrete block of commercial shithole where everything needs to be made as easily as possible for as high as you can go? there's nothing wrong in some things having human part in it, especially when it comes to creativity
" A.I. cannot tell personal stories the same way humans do. It cannot connect to humans as deeply as other humans can.
A.I. can reproduce the art, but it cannot produce an artist. "
YET
I work a blue collar job, and I was told for years that my job would be lost to automation, but seeing how the conversation has shifted as AI as advanced much faster than robotics is interesting to say the least.
I'm glad someone who knows how to write a prompt chimed in eventually. Some great ones near the end there
I think it is both always good to have skepticism, while also finding a middleground where creativity and AI generated art can coexist.
It literally cannot since an ai needs real art to create these outcomes. And no artist is willing to give their art up so people can create free version of their work. What you see here is a whole lot of stolen art mixed and spat out but these ais
@@nogb8367 If you understood anything about AI art, or the process behind this, you wouldn't say that. It doesn't "steal" art, it just analyzes it, and turns it into data. It's not stealing art, it's learning, improving, taking inspiration, etc. to create art by its own data.
@@pzychho of course tech fetishists would try their hardest to use mental gymnastics to explain theft away. Saying you feeding peoples are so the ai turns it into "data" is the same logic people use to launder money through an extra step.
Also an artwork on a screen is technically already "data" so it's just talentless hacks trying to moralize their theft
@@pzychho an ai is FED data, the hack developer needs to buy the rights to a work to be able to FEED it to his ai. The ai is not sentient. It's funny how you mention not knowing about ai when you lack basic human comprehention. It's either that you're a prick who doesn't care about theft, or a troglodyte who can put two and two together. Your choice 🤷
@@pzychho why are you so supportive of ai art?
9:10 the funniest thing I've ever seen on this channel
This AI art thing makes me worried for what little future of a career I had in art. Honestly looking to go back to school to try and get a degree in something that I could actually have a career in, but it’s starting to become nearly impossible
9:03, Damn wtf?? xQc if he was actually a gigachad
So I'm assuming that these AIs just take existing art with related tags from a massive image search and mashes it all together. Which makes it even sadder because its not just phasing out real artists, it's doing it using their own works right?
5:00 funkytown hawk
As an artist I can confirm this makes me regret my career choices and hobbies. To realize how easily replaceable your are, and by a machine at that, makes you feel pretty unimportant
learn coding
Grow a fucking spine. Artists are only obsolete if you fool yourself into thinking they're obsolete.
Damn buddy that's rough, get a real job now.
@@MaxiemumKarnage an artist drew your pfp
@@nejishadow nah man he's a troll don't mind him
7:32 Yeah sure, it has big biceps.... but we ain't gonna talk about how it has five of them??
I am a classical artist. I use paint and pencils and other physical mediums to create art. I don't really have a problem with ai art though. In fact, I recently started making it myself! It's a fun hobby and it's cool to see how the ai interprets and makes my prompts come together. It's really fun to play around with. I don't really feel threatened by it, and I actually use what they come up with as references and inspiration for my own art. I think it's really cool as long as it isn't being submitted in competitions or museums as "real art"
yeah + the fact that is the only thing that can make art close to the greatest painters in the world apart from, well.. Even greater painters, shows how incredible humans are. It doesn't invalidate artists, it makes them more impressive imo
That's true but in a way it raises the bar and wait until this AI stats getting updates
I have a problem with them using databases of living artists that did not consent.
They coding actual artist’s name in their prompts to get a certain style and that’s ridiculous.
Basically watch out with these rouge companies hiding behind “Ai” or “research purposes” when in reality it’s for commercial gains and not “democratise art” because they didn’t even gave the artists the stole from the option to opt it or out.
It didn’t had to go this way and the law are slow when it comes to technology but until then watch out for your data and don’t put your art online, unfortunately you will have no saying if it’s stolen
@@SemekiIzuio I think that's a good think tbh ahahha
What about the ais feelings!
As an artist I’m really feeling like that whole “Dey took our jahbs! ” South Park episode rn
11:23 Neuron Activation
2:40 it's showing him the AI's OC
4:45 truly, the future of art.
2:57 watching him delete “optimus prime” to write “Optimus prime” 0_o
This A.I art honestly terrifies me as a semi decent artist.
Nah dont worry ab it
I rly dont see this takinh over art
@blank it will take our jobs, it’s cool, but what purpose will humans have in 100 years?
@@rwholemilkisgood5050 what purpose do humans have RIGHT NOW?
the answer was and is none. people have never had a purpose, they make their own.
the fact that a robot can outperform everyone in the world at chess doesn't stop people from playing chess, does it?
Sorry dude why won't need you any more
@@christophkogler6220 chess is a sport played for fun. art is a product sold for money. if an ai can produce high quality art almost instantly and for free, then why would anyone hire an actual artist?
4:39 dam bro that pose is so elegant that looks like a fine art masterpiece right there
It's funny how California is so egotistical when they have an 8.6 waiting at their door!! 🤣
The spongebod descriptor literally just painted the background in a deep yellow 10:30
I also feel like maybe it just takes a larger percentage of focus on what is put in the prompt first
8:50: "How is an AI supposed to determine beauty?"
8:55: O_O
The freedom that the AI generated art gives is impossibly huge and pretty much endless.. it's scary how far AI art has reached.. imagine in a hundred years from now AI art will be instant and accurate (a lot more accurate than now)
The future is scary ngl
100 I fear it in 10
In 50 years we might have AI generated movies (that are actually coherent)
@@SimChucky 50? We already have people making slideshows and short videos with open source art generation. It will be much sooner than that.
AI is just basically committing art incest. Only humans are capable of making truly unique content. Art is what made humanity get to this point. I seriously doubt it will be the end all
@@Gandhi_Physique link, im curious
It can really pull off some Francisco Goya paintings, I was astonished at how true to his style some of the shit it made was.
as someone who is studying art, seeing AI artists claim they are not stealing art, and telling artists to "get over it", while also trying to claim prompts as their intellectual properties because "it takes skill to write good prompts" is very sad and scary
*ME ENCANTA FOLAR Y EYACUULLAR EN LA NOVIA DE Penguinz0 PORQUE SUBO BANGERS!! 😂👌* (translate pls😘)
I am an artist an am scared :(
@@scubatuba1083 no reason to be scared, don't worry. Specific commissions, animations, UI and character modeling are far from being taken over by an AI.
How is this stealing art? Please elaborate
@@Voidage1260 "Artists" are mad the AI is free and can't charge ridiculous prices for OC drawings
Given how fast it generates these images this is quite impressive. The longer you give AI to work, the better the result.
It's this fast when running locally on your computer too, which is insane.
The steps option is the quality of the image. If you turn it down you will have the same images that come up but just less quality.
not only does AI steal from artist, it’s the beginning of a much bigger problem. I encourage everyone to watch the video “ The end of art: an argument against image AIs”
Putting the discussion about how harmful AIs are to actual artists, people defending AI saying it’s so much work to put in prompts, don’t realize they’re just a pawn in the game. Every time you type in a prompt, and then choose the image that suits you best, you train the AI to find out what you like, and what the best version of your idea is. What makes you think an AI will need humans to write a prompt, when thousands of people are feeding it data by creating their own images right now.
Soon enough AI will write prompts based on current Internet events, as well as your private information, and create images, shows, etc based on it. Steven says it in his video best,
“The AIs will be very capable on running on autopilot, and it will get just as good at telling stories as they are at creating imagines and videos. They will produce novels, essays, and scripts in amounts that can fill the library of Babel, each piece a composit of half quotations and unattributed swiping. All this autogenerated text can be processed by the imagine and video AIs to generate long format media and the cycle will be complete. Self contained, and human free”
“We all feel a little uncomfortable when our phone shows us an add for something we mentioned to our friend over dinner, but what happens when it shows you a movie it made just for you about your breakup?”
“Our ambient digital systems already have intimate access to so many of the inputs that define our taste, in some sense, we sold our souls long ago”
All the people defending AI right now will realize the trap they created for themselves when it’s too late
So this is an argument against art ai right cause ai in different fields don’t spell doom for others. Say games if AI could make say a decent fps this would mean devs don’t have to work for big corporations & can give an affordable product to customers. Also why couldn’t artists ban together have an art ai that shows all the art it references and even pay the fellow artists. Also the listing things you like or are interested in already happens without ai not saying that’s good but it not something ai started.what about an ai that masks artists images so it can be stolen.and back to the game devs ai idea if ai benefits the workers should it still be band & how would you ban it
Y’all are so protective of your intellectual property monopolies and im totally here for watching them crumble.
@@banquetoftheleviathan1404 just wait for your job to be taken over
@@aderpypotato9270 autocad only makes it easier lol i draw for a living too. we have already been through this
That movie example sounds more sick than actually terrifying. I now want a full on series about my breakup.
as an artist, i’m genuinely worried companies are gonna start to rely on AI rather than giving actual artists jobs
i’m a writer so we’re kind of in the same realm of creativity, aren’t you more worried about your art not having meaning? if an ai can generate it in a couple clicks, what need does your art have to exist?
@@tommytwo-times9053 that’s absolutely scary, but i think the general population has greater respect for art made by actual people than a capitalist machine
edit: i was wrong
To make you feel better this isn't even the best ai
More likely artists will just start using the AI to greatly speed up their process and will use it as a tool where they can generate what they need and then just make tweaks to it or take ideas from it. Companies will always require a certain human aspect that can make changes and perfect whatever the vision is. It's very unlikely companies will be able to just generate exactly what they want/what they're looking for consistently without any issue. They will still need humans to flesh things out and mold the images in specific ways.
@@bestieswithtesties more likely companies will ask what's the point of hiring an artist when they can ask an unpaid internet to type a few words into a computer program
I think it's a tool talented artists will be able to use to save a lot of time. Especially the tools that work from images rather than text prompts.
If AI gets good enough to do things like completing backgrounds, color shading and line-smoothing consistently.. and can be taught to use an approximation of the style of the person using it, those artists can cut out 90% of the work and focus more on composition and fine-tuning.
One could snap a picture of the comic book panels you sketched in your notebook during math class and load them up in a few seconds. Then, edit the ai generated scene to how you want it.. inject specific characters on top of generic actors in the scene and get the AI to reprocess everything, cleaning up all the rough edges and blur marks.. etc.
That's exactly what I thought! I would love, love, love to have a digital background artist so I can focus more on the extra important parts! It'll be awesome for indie animation
@@kiwi6421 Having played around with stable diffusion a bit over the last few days, I think it can do distant "stock" backgrounds pretty well, (a generic nature backdrop, distant mountains, a city skyline, etc) and it can do more specific backgrounds decently if you give it an image to work off of. It does a poor job of preserving details though, and seems to just make new ones up. If you have a specific object in your image it might get replaced with a different object. Might be hard to get it to mesh with your style though.
Figures usually have bad shadowing, bad symmetry, bad anatomy. There can be extra joints, muscles or even limbs. It almost never does hands even remotely correctly. The closer you look the more obvious it becomes that the program has no real understanding of proportions, depth, shadows, anatomy, etc.
12:12 Batman had a roofie that's the only reason he was kissing the Joker.
One of the secrets to getting good AI art generation is always make multiple attempts. And make variations on something close. Nothing you see online is fully AI art. It’s a human and AI bouncing back and forth through many iterations until the human is satisfied.
My way of getting art I can think of in my head is to spend ten minutes drawing it, but waste hours finding the perfect image ig
8:48 Charlie: "how is an AI supposed to interpret beauty"
*AI interprets beauty*
"WOW!"
🤣🤣😂
I saw him and I only think this is definitely an Alistair lol
4:13 Optimus Prime + Iron Giant = _____
Optimus Giant or Iron Prime which ever one you think sounds better.
8:25 I think that was the same criticisms that art schools gave to Hitler. So let’s pray these AI artist get into art school.
5:28 I see this AI can do "dream" writing
5:08 Tony became an anime character in Air Gear Anime.
9:45 The AI decided that "my dad" is just old Francisco Franco
i finally tried this out for serious actual dope pictures to use for covers for music and i was happy with all my results, i got alot of jhonen vasquez and tim burton art and im so happy i can get pictures with those styles because i LOVE that shit
6:33 That looks like a manga panel out of Baki.
5:55 killed me
This will never fully replace human-made art. I consider this just another tool for artists to use to create. It is still driven by human input.
AI can generate some interesting things but it's not as if it will always generate exactly what a human wants at whatever moment, since the creation of the art is dependent on how the AI interprets its prompt. Just like human artists.
But using AI you can generate thousands of images, in only a few seconds. It's cheaper, faster, and sometimes better than hiring a real artist. This isn't taking away jobs from artists, it's allowing human creativity to flourish, and giving everyone the ability to create art.
@@pzychho exactly 👍
Very naive
@@vcc947 very cynical
Rip artists, I imagine it’s only a decade or two before a computer can spit out an entire 12 episode series in a day based on a single sentence prompt with six descriptors
Can't wait in 10 Years when porn companies start using AI generated art to make their thumbnails
God the thought of OF hoes being out of work because AIs make better pron fills me with so much hope for the future.
10 years? A collegue of me and I had a animation film project in our second semester in art school and we tried to generate backgrounds with AI because the project was due in 2 days and we didn't know what to do. We ended up repainting stock imagery because the AI art was so ass. That was not even a year ago. The AI art improved in ways unspeakable. This shit will happen in 1-2 years tops.
As an artist, we're only doomed if the ai can make very specific furry art.
We still got a chance to get that paper, bois.
deviantart banned AI art because of the specific furry art that was able to be produced in 40 seconds
(thanks TH-cam for deleting my comment xd)
Unfortunately there already is a website that generates AI fursonas/headshots (can’t say the link bc TH-cam)
We are doomed I guess
@@navalemon Noooo my suspiciously wealthy furry clientele!!!
Tbf, as an artist, I know most commission clients commission for the sole reason of having an artist's unique work. As scary as ai can seem, I'm a bit optimistic that artists aren't ultimately doomed.
@@GodlyAwesome haven't touched that site in ages, but good on them! For a site dedicated to user created works, it wouldn't be the best to have ai exclusively created works fill the pages.
Artists facing the axe, just as the factory labourer did before him.
Automation favours the consumer, and the profit margin.
This AI is more of a test of your descriptive writing skills if anything lmao, it's already been known that it takes actual work from actual artists and photobashes them to suit the descriptions. It still lacks character and messes up proportions though. But alas, artists are just constantly getting fucked oof, first the game and animations industry, NFTs, Clip Studio going subscription based, and now its AI
Photoshop too
When ai is able to make ai that is when nearly everything will be able to be replaced
Ok nerd chill
The image at 11:30 looks pretty damn similar to the album art for In Static by the band Edge of Reality. Pretty damn cool actually.
as a digital artist, this really scares the shit out of me to think that i might be put out of a job because ai could, one day, do it better
i really hope this doesnt go any further than where its at rn because this could seriously damage artists and take thousands of peoples livelihoods
Truck drivers share your pain
Artists about to become robot racists in the dystopian future
At the end of the day literally everything is becoming easier and easier and can be done by people with less and less experience. So to make a living one has to have multiple skills that they can use to create things that are more than the sum of their parts. The days of being just an artist or just a programmer or just an animator etc etc are near their end you have to bring more to the table than just one basic skill.
Yeah everything get automated nowaday but noooo not our precious "art"
Sorry to say this but GET A REAL JOB and learn coding while you are at it
..what??? bro art is. a professional job hello??? wtf are you talking about 😭
5:50 Tony Hawking
9:23 Charles Black
5:50 that's not a happy face LMAOOOO
Gotta love the commenters going "Art is useless/Get a real job 🤓 " acting as if the games they play don't have it lmfaooo. Hell even I think and know art isn't as valuable as lawyers and doctors for sure, but it is super hypocritical if you trash talk art yet play your games.
commercial art is an absolutely gigantic industry that involves humongous amounts of cash
Ah yeah fair point, sorry that didn't come into mind but yeah you right.
Good attempt but the artists working on games have actual jobs. That is literally their job. They spend hours upon hours trying to reach the creative vision of a group working towards the same goal. They're not some shithead furry artist charging disgusting prices for drawing OCs.
You're not on the same level as a fucking video game concept artist/artistic lead/etc. simply by shitting out your mid OC art. This is why people are telling you to get a real job, hell, you could be the one making these designs for a game but instead you choose to mald. Why?
Furthermore, AI art is entirely free (for now) and pretty well cuts out the cost and time of concept art and will only continue to improve.
Tl;dr, get a real job, art has very little value outside of hobbyists
@@floburst1229 it's mostly a lot of freelancer work for the artists though
California and its overpopulation of shit "artists" will be washed away this decade!! 😂🤣
I really love the thought of how AI art could help indie productions. AI generated art could supply material for artists to build off of. AI generated music could be awesome for musicians to build up off of. Especially if that technology is free and open source.
"To build off of" lmao
As if the AI couldn't make the whole thing better in a couple of years.
as someone who wants to be an artist as a career i hope this doesn’t take off and this is all people use
ok niɡɡer
@@Diedqra Damn bro, you got the whole squad laughing
@@Diedqra little off the cuff
It probably does in the future but dont really know when. but for now, if people want a really specific art making something like an original character or pieces, People still looking for an artist to commissions and using ai drawing as an early concept
If the ai actually taking over the scene in the future I just hope there's actually a job for human artist to provide or help the ai in the future
@Keshuel don't you worry mate, AI would probably start taking over coding soon too lol.
As a digital artist, I'm scared for my future now.
Time to start looking for real work!
@@MaxiemumKarnage Digital art is a real job tho..
[ Insert racist, sexist, homophobic, and transphobic bot comment to piss everyone off and make them cope and seethe].
Artists are going through the same thing indie game devs went through once the ability to just pump out asset flips and basic nonsense went mainstream. Gone were the days of a normal job with an income and in come the days of fighting through the sea of endless competitors where you either stick out and make a name for yourself or drown and move on to a new career path.
Glad to hear so! I dont hate artists or anything I just like people being scared, sorry about your future, that's a nice pfp if you did it
i had cool landscape results with prompts like - night time , industrial , far away light , smoke stack , pipes , fire
News on AI: Creative fields will be the least impacted in following years by AI
AI Art: *generates an art of a Mr Krabs playing the tiniest violin in the world*
what's scary to me, as an artist, is I was always sirethat no matter how good ai got, my career paths would probably be safe because how can ai ever create emotionally engaging art that provokes thought and yet here we are.
if ai is able to tackle something like art, then my opinion has changed to nothing is safe
Algorithmically generated youtube channels are slowly replacing youtubers as well. Research the dead internet theory.
11:30.. Yeh.. That looks like it came out straight from a super famous expert artist that does only this for a living and literally mastered that style. MAD
9:32 that kinda looks like the guy from the flash cd show
I honestly hate how good it is... I've been drawing for a few years and I couldn't replicate it. It's just upsetting
*I̳ L̳O̳V̳E̳ B̳E̳A̳T̳I̳N̳G̳ U̳P̳ A̳N̳I̳M̳A̳L̳S̳ A̳N̳D̳ R̳A̳P̳I̳N̳G̳ C̳H̳I̳L̳D̳R̳E̳N̳ BECAUSE I MAKE BANGER CONTENT 😂😂*
[ Insert racist, sexist, homophobic, and transphobic bot comment to piss everyone off and make them cope and seethe].
@Barret Wallace later in the video he got some great scenery ones
Mid journey creates way better ai generated art
It's funny how California is so egotistical when they have an 8.6 waiting at their door!! 🤣
As someone who currently doesn't have a job and gets most money from art this feels quite troublesome, but the art I'm making cant currently be replaced by an AI since the client is asking for personal designs, (I am a tattoo artist, digital artist and photographer) photography is already challenging cause of the competition out there but it is currently safe from AI since my clients are not famous enough for AI to recognize them but there is an issue with my tatto design style since it CAN be replicated and used in future AI art, most of my art is personalized tho so thats kinda what saves me in the moment, I do feel bad for concept artist though, but this could also be a tool for inspiration for artists out there as long as they just don't straight up sell the AI art as their own
don't worry about it ai art emulates but isn't original it copies existing drawings and kinda shits it out and it can seem original but it's just emulating if dat makes since
@@jeknem4262 yeah, the only really worrying factor is if people start selling them and how that can influence the art community, much like the nfts did...
"how is an AI supposed to interpret beauty... wow, holy shit"
I love this
It's funny how California is so egotistical when they have an 8.6 waiting at their door!! 🤣
@Adolfizzz0 maybe you should simplify of what you just said