SC interim order halts Gyanvapi, Sambhal, Ajmer, all mandir-masjid claims, invokes secular question
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.พ. 2025
- In landmark order, 3-judge bench led by CJI Sanjiv Khanna restricted all courts from passing interim/final orders, ordering surveys in pending suits challenging Places of Worship Act. Top court also directed the Centre to file an affidavit in two weeks, expediting resolution of constitutional challenge to 1991 law. In Episode 1571 of #CutTheClutter, ThePrint Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta discusses what it says, and its implications for Gyanvapi, Sambhal and Ajmer Sharif cases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Watch here: • India clinches both go...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@arvindmenswear66
This Season, Embrace Royalty & Legacy with our New Season Launch of Luxury Primante Collection Fabrics.
Discover our latest showcase featuring the esteemed People's Prince, Dr. Lakshyaraj Singh Mewar.
Own your day, visit your nearest Arvind Store and craft your perfect look.
#TheArvindStore #OwnYourLegacy #OwnTheMoment
tinyurl.com/3w...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ad-lite experience, exclusive content, special privileges & more - Subscribe to ThePrint for Special benefits: theprint.in/su...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Connect with ThePrint
» Subscribe to ThePrint: theprint.in/su...
» Subscribe to our TH-cam Channel: bit.ly/3nCMpht
» Like us on Facebook: / theprintindia
» Tweet us on Twitter: / theprintindia
» Follow us on Instagram: / theprintindia
» Find us on LinkedIn : / theprint
» Subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram: t.me/ThePrintI...
» Find us on Spotify: spoti.fi/2NMVlnB
» Find us on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/3pEOta8
Exclusive content, privileges & more - Subscribe to ThePrint for special benefits: theprint.in/subscribe/
So "chodo kal ki baate" doesn't apply to WAQF huh? For them you're ok with claiming any of our lands, while we can't even file a case about illegally occupied ASI monuments? Got it, won't be renewing my membership.
Thank you.
Hindus also have religious endowment. I'm all for nationalizing Wakf, but Hindu religious endowment should also be nationalized.
@@DataCrusade1999You people are literally paid and surviving on revenue from Indian temples
@@PS-ug7nm I would like to survive more in this economy where 5% growth is celebrated 🍾 🤣🤣. Alas bhakts can't digest these things.
@@DataCrusade1999 just 5%, na it should be 50% according to the current geo politics. Grow up school baby 🍼
For Mandir Masjid :" How can you claim a Mosque as a Temple?"
For Waqf: "You can claim whatever place you want , we won't say anything. That Parliament, that 7 LKM, Antilia, Red Fort everything"
Shekhar is being a hypocrite here. You can't cherrypick chandrachud words if you disagree with his oral judgement then you must disagree with the PoW act constitutionality and The act is not protecting the Secualism. This act is discriminatory against other religions. If historical wrongs should be forgotten then What about Caste based reservation what's the need for scratching the history on this issue. What's the need for writing Dalits history which American institutes are funding. Shekhar for your info I support reservation but not in its current form. But you'll never support the Hindu cause. I know it for a fact. Maybe you agree with this govt on some issues. But Hindus will never agree on this issue with the government.
start making dalits as preists of major Hindu temples across India, discussion about casteism will vaish into thin air, how does that sounds?
@@tvpuram are you stupid or pretending to be one?
First of all ask any Dalit activist if they want to become a priest?
Their answer will be a big no. They are getting huge benefit from the reservation why would they agree to become a priest who lives ascestic life. 95% of priests beg money for their daily expenses.
And 2nd I am pointing out the hypocrisy of Left leaning personality like Shekhar. I want reservations to continue but only for SC and STs with a creamy layer system. OBCs don't face any social discrimination so they shouldn't not get reservation. Yes they may be economically backward but not socially.
And last point on the temple entry or inclusion of Dalits priests in big temples. I have read the reports of the new Ayodhya temple and they have recruited Dalits priests in the new temple as well. VHP and RSS are doing pan India work for the inclusion of Dalit priests. Discrimination will be history in a few years but people who celebrate Invaders will never understand the real pain of Hindus.
@@tvpuram Wow, who would have ever guessed that making dalits priests in hindu temples is the magical fix for all caste debates? Our country really needs to pay more attention to deracinated mallus when it comes to solving tough social problems!
Hindu cause cannot be supported here!!
Tu pahle subscription le ya fr free me dekhna band kar. Hypocrite ne tujhko daawat nahi di dekhne ki.
Where does the idea of chhodo kal ki baatein go when reservation is in question ?
because caste discrimination is not just historical. It is a form of discrimination that takes place even today. Reservations will have to be collectively removed when the communities come forward enough. Tell me if Indian muslims are currently breaking temples and building mosques over them and it is is not being discussed parliament or courts.
Because caste operession, discrimination is still a reality
People get killed because they want to ride horse in the wedding, women get raped because others wants to show them their place, its still rampant. Big city its much less, small towns, villages, semi rural areas and tier two cities has this reality
Because the reality of inequalities & discriminations based on caste are AAJ KI REALITY, NOT KAL KI BAATEN
@@fawaaza.7743 Similarly, the mosques built back then after breaking temples is still exists till date.
SG u r right why open Mughal n British historical facts. But why don't u ask why a section of public is closely attaches itself with those who committed religious attrocities.
they attach themselves? how? this logic is weird. it is like asking why INdinsd are attached to supporting bal gangadar tilak when he supported child marriage. or other much older historical figures who may have supported sati.
@@fawaaza.7743A particular religious community openly celebrates and find their heros in characters like Babur and Aurangzeb instead of Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan or APJ Abdul Kalam. They try to whitewash and justify the actions of the said rulers while denying greatness to people like Kalam who belonged to the same community.
Absolutely they are continuation of the past. British occupation is past, but Islamic occupation is not the past since they strong support continues even today
@@fawaaza.7743"they dug up Ayodhya and found nothing"? How ignorant can you guys get? Ever seen the ASI survey? The evidence is so irrefutable there! And as far as "developed" countries that you always speak of are concerned. Believe me if you look there you'd see. In the words of Trump "the streets of London and Birmingham have become unrecognisable".
Every country does this. Reclaiming past glory and legacy. You aren't even able to accept that Ayodhya was where babur demolished a temple and built something else.
That shows your "secularism and tolerance". What's the difference between India and Pakistan? People like you consider that to be secular compared to India.
Answer this. Is it tolerance when you scream from the rooftops using loudspeakers in a secular country saying that your god is the only true one? This in a secular country? Using a loudspeaker?
And finally. I don't see you guys when waqf claims a land saying its 500 or whatever years old? I mean in my own state of TN, you and waqf taking over a 1500 year old temple. Oh sorry you guys go silent on this.
Why are Kashi and Mathura still under occupation??
@@fawaaza.7743 because then n now also Quoran n Hadis are common. U can't write new books like Hindus. So u will follow those Kafir non kafir division of humans n Dar AL Islam n Dar Al Harb for division of land. The moment u think these r out dated to present day circumstances, u become a kafir as Quoran is a book of future also n does not give scope of selection.
the most cluttered subject is Waqf act. However, media for obvious reasons chooses NOT to make a cut the clutter episode on it. now this episode on a court verdict. the question that needs to be answered is, do one community have a right to worship at a religious place where their ancestors worshipped and later lost due to act of state which is illegal and how they can be denied any justice just because it happened years ago.
If thats the case than will this apply to jain and buddhist temple broken by hindu kings and will the hindus be willing to give those back to jain and buddhist people
Exactly!
This where India is now. Our priority is to find a worship place which might or might not exist in past. And we want to be vishaw guru. RSS and brain washed a large number of people in last 10 year.
@@parnamsingh1716numbers of fools are increasing in this country at a very alarming rate, this fake "vishwaguru" narrative will soon be exposed
They dug under the Ayodhya mosque and found nothing. This is not to say that no temples were converted to mosques in the past.In fact, many Jain and Buddhist temples were converted to Hindu temples in the past too. Ultimately, what is the point of digging up the past (apart from helping a particular political party gain power)? Organized religions has been organically rejected by the population in advanced countries, and they are better off for that. Build factories, educational institutions provide good health care, and spread peace between communities. This is what our county needs now. Otherwise, what is the difference between India and Pakistan?
When are you doing a CTC on waqf act or waqf board.Its pending since beginning of CTC....
He doesn't have the balls to do it.
no courage to do it. that's the hallmark of lutyen media and call themselves un-hyphenated
@nagbalkur1365 yes I personally reminding him since 1 year...
Bcoz SG is scared of SAR TAN SE JUDA
@@user-f9u th-cam.com/video/vuMDirYIaAg/w-d-xo.html
Human injustice remains active forever. No courts or constitution practically limits .. Justice can't be denied specially without listening to aggrieved. Worship act is special upeasment disharmony by political upeasment .
I never understood how this act is linked to the basic structure of the constitution. Irrespective of the judgement on the places of worship act the surveys should be allowed as they only find facts and don't change the religious nature of the structure. This judgement is as ridiculous as the law itself.
considering that the fact that is it was called the basic structure of the constitution was given in the ayodhya verdict..I think people like to pick and choose according to their whims
Why are you interested in knowing the facts, of someone's religious structure?
@@antonyjohnpeter549Because someone else has occupied my place of worship.
@@fawaaza.7743we will change it
One simple way of looking at it is to recognise that the democratic constitutional republic of India gained independence and came into existence in Aug15 1947. Hence the constituation and laws on land ownership etc start from that status quo at Aug15 1947.
Think about it, it's entirely possible the land on which you have your current home was owned by some Royal family 100s of years ago and it got snatched from them by somebody else. Does it make any sense for descendants of previous owners to put a case on you to get your home?
One hand Hindus should not take up surveys,, but on the other hand WAKF can claim land starting from the Mughal era.. ..
Yes.
THAT'S THE BEAUTY OF SECULAR KHANGRESS RAJ
Collegium is the last vestige of the British Raj.
along with the law system and education system and railway system and Bengali poverty and partition and so on.
English language.
A tyrant who tortures rebels opposing his authority non-violently is evil, but an omnipotent deity who tortures rebels for eternity merely for rejecting his authority is not? 🤔
how can a tyrant torture non violently lol? besides, sinners and rebels are not the same but I agree with the point that gods cannot be merciful while also creating hell
@@fawaaza.7743 I meant rebels opposing the tyrant non-violently, not the tyrant torturing non-violently. Tormenting someone for mere opposition-whether called a ‘sinner’ or ‘rebel’-and doing so for eternity is pure tyranny. 😊
Now that You can ask Allah and try to find the answer. That is the purpose of our creation
A Muslim of faith can’t be a tolerant secular-its a paradox an oxymoron like a virgin mother
So it's OK to rebel against the Creator who created you?
Gave you life, gave you everything
Be humble and be thankful
And by the way rebellion against God doesn't harm him but it harms society
Because God's commandments are for the betterment of Society
Look around and see how much blessed we are
This law has nothing to do with constitution
then why are people saying opposing it is unconstitutional if it had nothing to do with it? And the bjp doesn't care what the constitution says. It just renamed the aircraft act in Hindi even though the constitution says all acts must be in ENGLISH. besides the consitituion promotes fraternity and discourages retrogression.
He just read out the text from the Ayodhya judgement that this law is given protection under the Basic Structure of the Constitution.
@@sakshamrai1803 which came into 1992 :D:D Good joke.
@@fawaaza.7743ONLY YOUR KHANGRESS CARED ABOUT CONSTITUTION THAT'S WHY THEY JAILED WHOLE OPPOSITION AND CHANGED IT
1. Contrary to what Shekhar would like us to believe, it is not as if any Tom Dick and Harry ( or any Ramu, Shamu and Bholu if you like it that way!!) is going with a petition to the Courts for survey!! All the petition are based on historical and other evidences and hence, survey is asked for so that archeological evidence is established. So every complainant is following the civil procedure within the due process of law. There can not and should not be any objection to it.
2. There is difference between place of prayer and place of worship. The Act itself gives exemption for sites under ASI. Also, to determine the character of the place, one needs to undertake a survey in any case. Today surveys can be done in an non invasive ways. We also understand that this is not against Muslims but against the foreign invaders who destroyed our cultural and religious sites and symbols. We must reclaim our past and in a civil way. So this is not Hindu versus Muslim issue. Mosques can be constructed elsewhere if it is established that it was built on a temple by the foreign invaders.
3. SC order today is just freezing the issue for the time being. Govt will have to come out clean on this issue and advise SC of its view on this unconstitutional law. Let us see how it goes in the next hearings.
4. There is no doubt that sickulars like Shekhar are really disturbed by the challenge to the Act. Modi Govt may in fact decide to amend or repeal it too, depending on how it assesses the political impact of it.
5. SC should understand that unless just decisions are made, any unbalanced judgement will eventually lead to the Ayodhya like situation in years to come. All of these cases today are in civil court and no political party is involved. But no one can guarantee what it will be like in 10 or 20 years hence. Hindus have now finally awakened to their mistreatments and injustice at the hand of successive secular governments and finally it will be the mob fury that will eventually do the justice. Hope desire and inclination to appease one community at the cost of another does not come in the way of justice, equality and common sense.
Please 🙏 use such enthusiasm towards development activities.
Bhakt pretending to be an intellectual.
@@DataCrusade1999 Good one!!! he! he!!!
@@DataCrusade1999you aren't able to refute anything he says right? Shows who's a real "bhakt" .
@@chatcricket1405 I can refute everything point by point with sources but I chose not to do it because for most bhakts the argument can be anything but at the end they(bhakt) will drive the whole conversation to a point where eventually they(bhakt) will make the argument that Islam as a religion itself is problematic, I don't accept that logic. So I choose not to engage with bhakts.
Under the guise of secularism Hindus have list their civilization and all rights
You mean losr
Peoples anger ... we have seen in Syria ... burning of Assads fathers grave. I am a moderate Hindu. Full respects to secularism. But ... But ... want to put forth my view on Gyanvyapi and Mathura mosque. Hindus feel humiliated on seeing these structures. A correction is needed. Atleast these 2 places are handed over to Hindus.
100% agree. Only mslims are allowed in mecca, medina while all other religions are banned in saudi. Yet, Hindus face such humiliation in their sacred sites in their own land as majority, totally unacceptable
Secularism was not in the original constitution, if read carefully. Why do you hide the fact that it was included later.
Shekhar, what if the current parliament/government decides to repeal the 1991 act?
struck down by the court as it is basic structure of constitution according to ayodhya verdict. also bjp doesn't have a majority so that's not happening
Constitution will come into play.
It won't!!! That is the whole point. And if you think that Supreme Court went against the Government here, please think again. Weren't your peers expecting this ever since a very rich Person refusued US investment? When one seeks investments from Global Madarsa funders and Dawood Ibrahim's empire protectors, won't some consequences follow?
@@fawaaza.7743BJP doesn't have majority? Agreed they dont have majority on their own bit but their two allies arent gonna leave them...
BJP literally revived TDP and Jana sena by putting their force behind thus entirely demoliting Jagan and Nitish cant do shit except take a u-turn but he will not considering upcoming BJP election so....
@@fawaaza.7743ACT HAS GOT NOTHING TO DO WITH CONSTITUTION
IT CAME LONG AFTER CONSTITUTION WAS MADE
KHANGRESSI TRIES TO HIDE EVERY BLACK DEED OF THEIRS BEHIND CONSTITUTION
There is nothing complicated about our history.. it's really quite straightforward. One group of people destroyed places if worship of another faith. There is no complication, no confusion.
Muslims were given a veto on everything by Gandhi-Nehru duo and every thing done was based on this. Even this act was the result of same. Why should the state treat Hindus like second class citizens in India , which they are in every other country worth naming. It must change for old hindu hurt to get healed. M s take everything based on street power which we don't. We depend on court. Are the courts saying only street power matters
The worship Act is an act which is arbitrary and against the law of Natural Justice, If people are not allowed to go to court than is the state not provoking them to take the law in ones own hand ? This law must be done away forthwith
SG is happy today with the SC judges. Anyway he is wrong when he says the existing surveys are stopped. It's only for the new petitions and nit for the ones, especially Gyanvapi . The time for 4 weeks is given to the central government to submit an affidavit.
He said 2 weeks....u are saying 4 weeks....which one is correct.
Waiting for an episode on Atul Subhash and the laws being biased against 50% of the population of the country.
SG is back to his basic character. Who is he to call the CJI as indiscreet.
Sir,
@ 16:30 - Illustrative List of Muslim Places of Worship Where case have been filed claiming right of worship
11. Juma Masjid, Magaluru, Malali Mosque
This is not Magaluru. It's Mangaluru (or Mangalore)
शेखर गुप्ता खुश हुआ।
Anything against Hindu makes SG happy.
He will keep quiet on Waqf and George Soros connection with Gandhi family.
This is the reason I haven't taken membership of The Print.
Don't watch as well and go watch your godi Media
The Sharia Court of India. The order is irrational and even vindictive. What purpose is served by staying the proceedings and stopping filing of fresh suits? Neither the law nor common sense supports such a move. In India, so far hundreds of laws have been challenged. But the proceedings under those laws had never been stayed.
U are hypocrate & biased in apportioning inappropriate manifestations on Ex CJI Chandrachud …
Very poor state 👇🏿
Also will chhodo kal ki baatein apply when muslim protest on babari demolition, gujarat riot? lol their hypocrisy is astounding 😂
माननीय संजीव खन्ना जी काश यह निर्णय आप पहले ले लेते संभल मैं कुच्छ निर्दोष माँ बाप के बच्चे बच जाते , नफ़रत का पैमाना कुछ कम हो जाता
For Shekhar Guptaji , some Supreme Court directives are holier than other comprehensive judgments by the same court. His opinion abandons him and he resorts to film songs, abandoning his concerns for Bangladesh Hindus being killed , unmentioned/ denied by his vile team,he humming ‘chodo kal ki batten….’what hypocrisy!
What happened to the Church in Turkey will not happen with our temples again.
Places of worship act itself has excluded Ayodhya issue from its jurisdiction and hence any reference and comments made in its respect in Ayodhya judgement would be infructuous.
he's a stooge..what did y'all expect huh? 😂 see there's no video on soros-adani issue!
What's the basis for the order? Under which Act?
Saying that there can be more than God is like there is more than one driver in a car. One driver wants to go left, other wants to go right, other wants to go front and another wants to go backwards. The car will not go anywhere. If there are multiple gods one will wish for something and another will wish for something opposite and there will be war with each other. So, there is only possibility of God being one. Who is this God? Only Islam and Judaism are the major religions that actually believes in one true God. The scriptures used by Jews have known to be corrupted and has contradictions but the Qur'an is uncorrupted and has no contradictions. Several ancient manuscripts have been found including the Brimhingam Qur'an which is the same as the Qur'an that we have today. Allah has promised to preserve the Qur'an. So, Islam is the only true religion. Islam is not what the liars who have a political agenda say.
Qur'an is available in hindi and many languages online.
Last 10 years China rocketed ahead to be No.1 in technology through R&D priority by Chinese Gov.
India busy in last 10 years doing Hindu Muslim.
Great 👍
China also demolished mosques all over the country, should India also follow them according to your logic?
@@aashutoshbhatt6535 India should become greater than China, economically, first.
@@aashutoshbhatt6535
These politicians who are asking the youth to do Hind Muslim are sending their kids to West to make their life better and settle there.
@@mg.f.9023no word on waqf taking over temples, farmlands right? No word on waqf claiming a 1500 year old temple ?
There is no clutter here to cut!!
Let us define secularism first! I am sure the judges are aware of what it means
A very good order from Honorable Supreme Court
Great 👍
leftist supreme court
"chodo kal ki baatein...". Who wrote the places of worship act law...?....by taking whom into confidence? Because Hindus are losing "chodo kal ki baatein"...why not nullify Sharia law saying "chodo kal ki baatein"?
Typical secular opinio. From the Print, what else do you expect?
He says "complex history" so "secular" to even admit brutal violent Islamist invasions and subjugation. Bharatiyas are not even supposed to search for the facts....just accept history told and written by invaders.....he did not even have the gumption to say the partition of Bharat was on communal lines. The oppressed Hindus mainly in the north cannot even ask for justice in a peaceful manner in court of law. It is so true....hundreds of years of foreign rule has erased the pride and confidence of natives....an wounded civilization in the words of Naipaul. S G Gupta has not been honest in disseminating information....just trying to touch thorny issues with steel gloves....so sorry
Dear Shekar sir and Team Print,
I took ur membership since am ur great fan,but I am deeply disappointed by u and ur team , as no one is speaking about MR VIJAY political entry against all major ruling parties at all levels.pl tell its against ethos tat rulomg party in TN is controlling almost all industry from cinema to media ,how one big ruling party is nearing it's end because of dynasty.
FAMOUS QUOTE
IF AMBEKAR HAS TOLD ALL ARE EQUAL BY BIRTH ..IT ALSO MEANS NO ONE CAN BECOME CM BY BIRTH
By your argument
1. The waqf act is unconstitutional and against secular fabric
2. The places of worship act equally is unconstitutional because it discriminates and oppressed a religious right against another religious right.
So Indian Hindus have no right to re-claim back their desecrated temples??
Only a foolish INDI Secular constitutionalist can breathe in peace bcoz in present day & age of Constitutionalism,no SC bench can hold Such a partisan piece of legislation POW Act which deprives non Muslims right to seek judicial recourse- wait till GOI strategises to file affidavit toeing BJP line
Isnt it unconstitutional to violate right to justice, right to know for a society? One community by law is not allowed to legally fight for its worship place!
In preamble, which word has higher weightage, justice or secular?
Shekhar Saab with all due respect to your contribution And stature in Journalism I humbly wish to add that observation and statement of former CJI lower have not Latched on to it But found clearance from SC to issue the orders for survey.
I think that would be more precise, with respect to you Sir 🙏
Truth must come out. Satyameb jayate.
Repeal the unconstitutional 1991 worship act.
Modi has no b@lls to amend the POW act but will fire from the shoulders of the judiciary which itself has no b@lls. Good they displayed some at least finally.
Modi wants to stay in power at any cost.
Does right to judicial remedy fall under basic structure of the constitution?
They like to pick and choose for them only secularism that's added during emergency falls under basic structure nothing else
A 500 year old land donated by a Muslim King can be considered as "Waqf".
Is it valid in India today?
Is there potable water for everyone in India?
@@antonyjohnpeter549lol typical Pakistani.
Is there portable water for everyone in any place in the world??
@@antonyjohnpeter549ITALIAN DOG BISCUITS ARE ALSO NOT AVAILABLE FOR ALL😢
Are you sure that you understand what is the meaning of the word SECULAR?
For them except BJP and RSS everything is secular.
@@Uncommon_Road I don't know about others but rss and bjp are definitely not secular lol.
@@fawaaza.7743congress, owasi, left and all your other parties as well aren't secular right ?
After all secularism from a person who demanded for Pakistan is something new.
@@Uncommon_Roadtrue who told you BJP is secular
@@anujsethi7845SECULAR ARE ONLY THOSE WHO ROAM AROUND CLAIMING TO BE JANEUDHARI BRAHMAN 🤣🤣🤣
Shekhar, Hindus are ready to forgive the mistakes of medieval rulers, at the same time they retain the right to correct those mistakes in their own right. As you mentioned those incidents were mistakes committed in the past (medieval). Hindus do not need to carry the burden of secularism and it is good for secularists to give away these places and live peacefully.
Too late.
@@antonyjohnpeter549BUT NOT TOO LATE FOR HAGIA SOFIA - PAPPU LOGIC
If they take out mehrabs out of mosque and ignore qibla, take out the minarets and teach quran, hadiths in local langues, accept local gurus - guru nanak Sahib, mirza Ghulam qadiyani as the prophets of Islam, then the mosques are not a problem. If they want find Allah only inside kaba of mecca, then it's a big problem for the non muslims.
If interested in problems, you can find it in the USA 🇺🇸 and Canada also.
We have no problem with anyon'es belief. Our only problem is Glorification of invaders.. Hindus are rarely bothered who Muslims worship, We just dont care. We are People who worship Thousands of Gods, One more God Jesus or Allah make no differnce to us.
who are you to decide ?
@@antonyjohnpeter549 ? You had recent elections courtesy democracy. Stop crying and go to Afghanistan if you are not happy in US, canada.
@@musthafamohammad5695HE IS A HINDU FROM HINDUSTAN
WHO ARE YOU?
Amending the PoW and Waqf Act will end this madness
Let there be no random Land claims
High court will not solve dispute of Mandir Masjid created by Advani and likeminded leader Sidelining spiritual mind
We want all our temples back
If a temple is destroyed and it sacred scripts and deity are used to construct floor and staircase , should the community whose religious structure is built by destroying temple not feel remorseful or ashamed . What kind of religious mindset would you need to possess to insult other faith
Not after 500 years.
@ so what is happening to Christian’s in Lebanon Syria Pakistan Bangladesh is okay according to you because it is old dispute almost 1400 years old
Ignore all the historical blunders that were the norm at that age. Fix Indian officials looting Indians first. Indian officials looted more than any historical dynasties!
Finally, some sensible (though interim) decision by SC
This decision must have disappointed many jobless people
Pathetic video
Just quote the price, judge's will flip and 20 min of your explanation is a futile practice
Dargah survey karne aao ge toh zaroor par jaoge nahi😂😂😂
Where all gyana goes in matter of waqf property old man?
8:37 Are you sure it is about coalition partners and not more about the new investments sought by its biggest benefactor after refusing investments from U. S.?
If India is Secular then why temples controlled by Government but Masjids, Churches not controlled by Government????
@10:00 Was that word really processual? Cause the text read 'procedural' 🧐
.
Processual archaeology is a theoretical approach to archaeology that began in the 1960s and 1970s.
Methinks Chandrachud also likes to wear the overalls of an archaeological digger.Is he not the cutest judge in recent times ❤
We the Indian are busy with silly matters. We need good education, good road, employment, power, clean water, better health care and India host highest number of poor people of the world. But some section are busy to divide india based on religion instead of focusing burning issues. We should be ashamed for this retrogression of national life.
That’s not going to happen due to bad and illiterate politicians
Your analysis seems to be biased and without any logic. Whether on the same principle u can support new waqf amendment to stop daily new claims on properties and whether worship acts should be applicable on temples in J & K which were demolished after 1947.
The center is not responding to the Supreme Court because it doesn't want to anger its votebank . 😅
the Supreme Court doe snot require vote banks as it is not elected by the public.
🇮🇳 🇮🇳 🇮🇳 🇮🇳 🇮🇳 🇮🇳 🇮🇳 🇮🇳 🇮🇳
कोई भी जाकर ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद को पीछे से देख लेगा तो अंधा भी कह देगा कि वह मंदिर था यह हमें पागल समझते हैं l
काम से काम कोर्ट को तो सच बोलाने की ताकत होनी चाहिए
गूगल पर फोटो देख लेगा ना तब भी अंडा भी बता देगा वह मंदिर है l
Why? Supreme Court is judicial body not governing body. It has no right to deliver judgements like this. This is judicial overreach.
Any one who does not have any interests involved or political interests can very easily understand the unconstitutionality of this law But shekhar Gupta you cannot it is already evident in the comment section 😂😂
Bhakts would harp on how unjust this order is and bhakts would make remarks about Wakf act.
Namazi would Cry again When SC demolish Act
@@aemssw2387 proved my point 🤣🤣
@DataCrusade1999 Namazi is always Namazi
@@aemssw2387
For the past many years, bhakts have tried many names, but nothing stuck. But everyone today knows that BJP supporters are called BHAKTS.
@@aemssw2387 For the past many years, bhakts have tried many names, but nothing stuck. But everyone today knows that BJP supporters are called BHAKTS.
Great job by the Supreme Court
Get to know Sai Deepak's take on the fallacious reference to the Places of Worship Act in the Ayodhya Judgement.
हीरामंडी ने कोई काम किया है जो चल रहा हो उसपर स्टे लगाना। निकम्मे
Kudos to the Print for staying strong on their ethics, morals and principles despite a large portion of their youtube viewers and commentators being right wing trolls!
Science & Scientific proof should prevail ?
Thank god lets focus on actual issues now instead, god bless us
Agree 👍
True, we are also tried of this court drama,
Desired result now will be achieved by other means. It's clear communal court don't want the peaceful solution.
Justice is due.
ACTUAL ISSUES LIKE WHAT?
KISSAN NAUTANKI?
Scientific Temper ?
SC should only Consider proffs ?
Muslim cant'be & show secular ?
Thanks
Sekhar Gupta biggest secularist
Secularism has made Hindus to forego their rights
Hindus encourage that
It's funny that some legislations like Places of worship Act are treated as sacrosanct and beyond any revisitations, while the legislations like Waqf (Amendment) Act and Citizenship amendment act being considered or passed by the same Parliament is treated with contempt and disdain. In the end, it's all about street power, which some communities wield, and many don't. The last time this street power was wielded en masse, the country was partitioned. Anyways, nothing can be said or done to persuade the Ostriches of our times that it is time now to dig your heads out of the sand.
All justice is about something that has happened not now, but in the past. Justice is about the past.
Ram mandir was unique case, we can't push envelope too much it is truth all these major Islamic monuments built by destroying temples, best example adhai din ka Jhopra Ajmer, qutub Minar, it is what it is, we can't change what has happened just move forward, I only wish places of worship act strike some kind of balance
What about Taj?
AYODHYA
KASHI
VARANASI
ARE ALL AGE OLD ISSUES
1991 worship act should be repelled.
How can state allow personal religious law if it has to uphold secular polity? Unfortunately from Mahatma Gandhi to present state the secular principle is meant for hindus and miniscule minorities while followers of religion of peace and western religions can have their personal laws.
If state can adjucate its duties based on equality for all then first of all it has to halt institutions based on religions.
Best solution is that in the spirit of secularism, the Muslims should admit that mosques in India were built over demolished temples, wherever. Thereafter it should not matter who prays for the Nation in those places …. Everybody is after all human
will never happen
What were people doing during demolition?
@@antonyjohnpeter549 Same as what people were doing when India was invaded and when India was colonized…. Failed to put up collective resistance
@kallachi729 Now it is too late.
@ too late for what… to say that temples were demolished… ai am not asking for evacuation…only acknowledgement as fellow humans and fellow Indians… just an “Yes”
Dont say the Hindu side said this. I am a Hindu too and i disagree with what these people are ddoing. Focus should be on development, jobs not on places of worship
Much awaited decision, though belated. Hope, people could look upto him for justice.
Congress betrayed India by passing Places of Worship Act. Needs to be repealed
TOTALLY AND PERMANENTLY
over whelming opinion as per comments I read below tell that to print and to our SC to FO ...hindus will reclaim whats right fully there ... uske baad likhenge nayi kahani
Please 🙏 provide potable water to all citizens.
@@antonyjohnpeter549How about MILK POWDER SACHET for you?🤣
Sekhar, take poor Hindu case also where in the veil of waqf act poor Hindus land and mandir are taken over by waqf board and the matter go to tribunal where the Muslim judges at tribunal don’t decide case for 20-30 years and poor Hindus till than barred to sell the land for some marriage in family
Would have sc given same judgement if roles were reversed?
I think there is a correction, either on the screen or on the original Supreme Court order. ‘Processual’ as a term exists, it’s new for myself too, but, on the screen it writes ‘procedural’.
This matter would have been heard by Former CJI Chandchud when the matter came first.
This unnecessary and genius (?)was allowed to keep going for long.
WHOEVER HEARS IT
IT WOULD BE BASED ON GOV REPLY FOR THE SAME