Sean was physically in better shape in 2019 than he was in 2006-08. He was pretty skinny back then whereas he was a lot more built in 2019 so if anything, 2019 was prime Sean. Plus he was only 34 which is still prime age.
Jack and Phil overpowered Sean much easier than Dean and Max did. Plus, even after Phil knocked Sean to the floor, Sean didn't get up and fight back like he did with Jack. It could be because he knew Phil would have landed him in hospital in his prime and was still wary even though Phil was 5 years past his prime at that stage. But Grant would destroy them all. Grant>Phil>Jack>Sean>Max>Dean.
Because this is EastEnders it's pretty unrealistic but in reality if Sean threw those 2 punches even if they were out of nowhere it would of knocked jack out and the uppercut was probably the only one realist thing because uppercut has knocked people down before i think if they had a rematch i think sean would win he's lot more better when he's cocky and defensive in this he was more offence let people attack first
Sean was physically in better shape in 2019 than he was in 2006-08. He was pretty skinny back then whereas he was a lot more built in 2019 so if anything, 2019 was prime Sean. Plus he was only 34 which is still prime age.
Yes I agree. As I said in the video Sean was at his best when he fought Jack but Jack wasn’t
@@bbcsoaphistorian123 I think they were both at their best. The version of Jack who fought Sean would even give Ravi a run for his money.
Spot on 💯
Jack can take punches way better than Sean, that's why Jack took 4 punches from Sean like a beast and then won with a cracking punch at the end
Exactly his durability and endurance aren’t even close to Jacks
Jack is a better fighter than sean I agree I think jack would win the trilogy
@@bbcsoaphistorian123jack would win but there on same level Jack's durability and power is better but they have same spped agility stuff like that
Absolutely.
Jack beat Sean fair and square. Like you said I dont get how this is still a debate
Can we do BBC Historian v Ricky Butcher Sr. My money's on you pal.
I second that.
I actually made a TH-cam short comparing me to Denzel so I will upload that soon. I could probably do your request
@@bbcsoaphistorian123 yes that'd be ace.
@@H.K.5 Thirded
@@RandomUploads-ch3bh I’m thinking of doing myself vs the Branning brothers…
Can you do Jack vs Dan Sullivan?
Sure
Jack and Phil overpowered Sean much easier than Dean and Max did.
Plus, even after Phil knocked Sean to the floor, Sean didn't get up and fight back like he did with Jack.
It could be because he knew Phil would have landed him in hospital in his prime and was still wary even though Phil was 5 years past his prime at that stage.
But Grant would destroy them all.
Grant>Phil>Jack>Sean>Max>Dean.
Because this is EastEnders it's pretty unrealistic but in reality if Sean threw those 2 punches even if they were out of nowhere it would of knocked jack out and the uppercut was probably the only one realist thing because uppercut has knocked people down before i think if they had a rematch i think sean would win he's lot more better when he's cocky and defensive in this he was more offence let people attack first
hewooo
Hey man! I haven’t seen you since Ashton’s birthday how you been?
@@bbcsoaphistorian123 good
@@chillidawg4 Awsome