Warrens the man, no dispute he's Hollyoaks best ever hardman and even if the show survives after he leaves i don't think they will ever have a hardman that will achieve even half of what he has achieved. He destroys Cain with ease, its an insult in my opinion that anyone thinks Cain even compares to Foxy. Furthermore hes the only hardman in soap that i wouldn't have much argument if people think he'd beat prime Phil and Grant (I don't think he would but i 100 percent understand why people would).
@@Topboy53 in a fight more than possibly. He's gone toe to toe with other elites (neither Phil or Grant have managed this in over 40 yrs) and managed some of the best fights in soap history (Grant clearly hasn't, Phil would be lucky to have any of his 3 fights in the top 10/15), has beat people to death (Phil hasn't even put anyone in A&E despite throwing more punches than anyone else in soap history), has shown the best durability bar none (he still went toe to toe with Brendan and won after having a plant pot smashed over his head, look how easily Grant was knocked out by a mere vase or how Phil goes down easy when hit with an object), beat multiple guys in prison and has never feared ANYONE (both Phil & Grant have). He's also been active on every single one of his years, Grant and Phil both went 4 yrs in the 90s without throwing any leather (can't blame age hear like we can 2023 Phil)
@@tomhiggins6542 Accurate and to the point as usual. Warren could give even prime Grant a good fight as all Grant did was throw people around or grapple with them. Grant's only major feat was beating up a 50 year old has been ex copper in 1991. When he fought off the cops in 1993 all he did was throw them off rather than fight them off. Grant was an ex para but his main feats was targeting a 50 year old man, or abusing women like Sharon and Tiffany, or picking on easy targets like David Wicks. I think Warren Fox and Dan Sullivan are 2 of my most rated soap hardmen. Dan threw Phil to a wall with relative ease. Warren, Dan then after them, Phil and Grant.
@@Uksoapfan No way Dan is above Phil and Grant, they both have better feats than him, Phil has the best strength features in soap, Warren isn't above them but unlike with Dan I understand why you have him above due to him having the best hardman legacy.
@@Topboy53 Dan only did 1 year, in that time he managed to overpower Phil on 1 occasion and KO him on another (tad lucky), he didn't have decades to put feats together like The Mitchell's. Compare his one and only year to Grants first year and Dan's EASILY in front.
Great video warren is definitely one of the best Hardmen But alot of hollyoaks fight scenes don’t look great like the punches don’t even look like they hit most of the time but with shows like eastenders and emmerdale there fight scenes look real
Calvin is underrated. He had two fights with Warren, won the first one in 07 and the big one in 09 when Warren went over the balcony was arguably a draw and even then it’s only because Calvin showed mercy before Foxy hit him from behind
Warren also beat Brendan after been hit with the plant pot, Grant in contrast was knocked out easy by Dougie after been hit with the vase (same applies to Phil for whenever hes hit with an object). The prison footage was genius, people who didn't watch EE at the time are under the illusion Grants time inside was totally badass (it wasn't remotely).
Thing is, hollyoaks is a very silly soap now and probably the least realistic soap. The way Warren is like some sort of superhero now who can beat up multiple guys in prison is just silly. No matter how tough you are, no one is beating 4 big guys against you by yourself. I do agree Warren is the hardest character in hollyoaks but he was written originally to have a bit more vulnerability when it came to fighting
@@lukethomasdillon3762 and EE is highly realistic??? We've got characters returning from the dead more often than the tubes run on time, shows retconned it's own history on multiple occasions, Lucas killing 3 people and getting early release for good behavier, King Philths insane plot armour , Kat giving birth and not remembering, b-movie level dialogue nobody in the world would ever say and Max and Phil as sex god's. And as for been treat like some kind of superhero, how about Lauren shouting "we'll get Phil Mitchell" after Whitney went missing. We can't play the EE prides itself on realism card here when the show constantly reminds us it's fictional with OTT storytelling, non stop surnaming (NOBODY surnames like this in real life, pure wooden dialogue) and constant call backs, we're almost at a point where I expect Sharon to say "I remember back in Xmas 86 when 30 million people turned in to see my dad handing my mum her divorce papers".
@@tomhiggins6542 that Phil and max thing cracked me up. Dude all soaps have there ridiculousness. I would say EE is a lot more grounded in reality or at least tries to be. They also have a lot better long term storytelling. Hollyoaks these days kill of characters Willy nilly. Everything they do is for shock factor. Big stunts and bad actors. Hollyoaks used to be gritty and amazing
@@lukethomasdillon3762 it's one of the worst. It's hard to say EE tried to be grounded in reality when show constantly reminds us it's fictional, insane plots, ridiculous plot armour, non stop surnaming & cheesy dialogue, constant call backs and frequently bringing back past characters (even when their supposed to be dead). The show often resembles The Allister Macgowern spoof sketches.
@@lukethomasdillon3762 Warren hit two of those guys in the nuts, it is possible to beat a bunch of guys by yourself if you keep targeting that area if you already know how to fight like Warren does.
I don’t know how anyone can say Warren isn’t the hardest Hollyoaks character ever.
Neither can I
Foxy has definitely earned his place as Hollyoaks hardest and his definitely earned his place as top 3 hardman of all time ❤
Warren is the best
He sure is
@@bbcsoaphistorian123 ace vid pal
Keep weren't in holloaks until his retirement ❤
The king of Hollyoaks. 👑❤️💪👏🏆👊✊👍🥇.
Warrens the man, no dispute he's Hollyoaks best ever hardman and even if the show survives after he leaves i don't think they will ever have a hardman that will achieve even half of what he has achieved. He destroys Cain with ease, its an insult in my opinion that anyone thinks Cain even compares to Foxy. Furthermore hes the only hardman in soap that i wouldn't have much argument if people think he'd beat prime Phil and Grant (I don't think he would but i 100 percent understand why people would).
Warren would wipe any version of those 2 Walford brothers off the map. Warren is so much more ruthless and reckless.
In a feud, he would, in a fight no.
@@Topboy53 in a fight more than possibly. He's gone toe to toe with other elites (neither Phil or Grant have managed this in over 40 yrs) and managed some of the best fights in soap history (Grant clearly hasn't, Phil would be lucky to have any of his 3 fights in the top 10/15), has beat people to death (Phil hasn't even put anyone in A&E despite throwing more punches than anyone else in soap history), has shown the best durability bar none (he still went toe to toe with Brendan and won after having a plant pot smashed over his head, look how easily Grant was knocked out by a mere vase or how Phil goes down easy when hit with an object), beat multiple guys in prison and has never feared ANYONE (both Phil & Grant have). He's also been active on every single one of his years, Grant and Phil both went 4 yrs in the 90s without throwing any leather (can't blame age hear like we can 2023 Phil)
@@tomhiggins6542 Accurate and to the point as usual. Warren could give even prime Grant a good fight as all Grant did was throw people around or grapple with them. Grant's only major feat was beating up a 50 year old has been ex copper in 1991. When he fought off the cops in 1993 all he did was throw them off rather than fight them off. Grant was an ex para but his main feats was targeting a 50 year old man, or abusing women like Sharon and Tiffany, or picking on easy targets like David Wicks. I think Warren Fox and Dan Sullivan are 2 of my most rated soap hardmen. Dan threw Phil to a wall with relative ease. Warren, Dan then after them, Phil and Grant.
@@Uksoapfan No way Dan is above Phil and Grant, they both have better feats than him, Phil has the best strength features in soap, Warren isn't above them but unlike with Dan I understand why you have him above due to him having the best hardman legacy.
@@Topboy53 Dan only did 1 year, in that time he managed to overpower Phil on 1 occasion and KO him on another (tad lucky), he didn't have decades to put feats together like The Mitchell's. Compare his one and only year to Grants first year and Dan's EASILY in front.
Great video warren is definitely one of the best Hardmen
But alot of hollyoaks fight scenes don’t look great like the punches don’t even look like they hit most of the time but with shows like eastenders and emmerdale there fight scenes look real
Calvin is underrated. He had two fights with Warren, won the first one in 07 and the big one in 09 when Warren went over the balcony was arguably a draw and even then it’s only because Calvin showed mercy before Foxy hit him from behind
Warren also beat Brendan after been hit with the plant pot, Grant in contrast was knocked out easy by Dougie after been hit with the vase (same applies to Phil for whenever hes hit with an object). The prison footage was genius, people who didn't watch EE at the time are under the illusion Grants time inside was totally badass (it wasn't remotely).
Thing is, hollyoaks is a very silly soap now and probably the least realistic soap. The way Warren is like some sort of superhero now who can beat up multiple guys in prison is just silly. No matter how tough you are, no one is beating 4 big guys against you by yourself. I do agree Warren is the hardest character in hollyoaks but he was written originally to have a bit more vulnerability when it came to fighting
@@lukethomasdillon3762 and EE is highly realistic??? We've got characters returning from the dead more often than the tubes run on time, shows retconned it's own history on multiple occasions, Lucas killing 3 people and getting early release for good behavier, King Philths insane plot armour , Kat giving birth and not remembering, b-movie level dialogue nobody in the world would ever say and Max and Phil as sex god's. And as for been treat like some kind of superhero, how about Lauren shouting "we'll get Phil Mitchell" after Whitney went missing. We can't play the EE prides itself on realism card here when the show constantly reminds us it's fictional with OTT storytelling, non stop surnaming (NOBODY surnames like this in real life, pure wooden dialogue) and constant call backs, we're almost at a point where I expect Sharon to say "I remember back in Xmas 86 when 30 million people turned in to see my dad handing my mum her divorce papers".
@@tomhiggins6542 that Phil and max thing cracked me up. Dude all soaps have there ridiculousness. I would say EE is a lot more grounded in reality or at least tries to be. They also have a lot better long term storytelling. Hollyoaks these days kill of characters Willy nilly. Everything they do is for shock factor. Big stunts and bad actors. Hollyoaks used to be gritty and amazing
@@lukethomasdillon3762 it's one of the worst. It's hard to say EE tried to be grounded in reality when show constantly reminds us it's fictional, insane plots, ridiculous plot armour, non stop surnaming & cheesy dialogue, constant call backs and frequently bringing back past characters (even when their supposed to be dead). The show often resembles The Allister Macgowern spoof sketches.
@@lukethomasdillon3762 Warren hit two of those guys in the nuts, it is possible to beat a bunch of guys by yourself if you keep targeting that area if you already know how to fight like Warren does.
I agree Warren is easily hollyoaks hardest character of all time, he could maybe even beat grant Mitchell in a fight
Every chance pal.
Maybe, I’d put my money on Grant though.