Engineering company looks at the future of A.I.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ต.ค. 2023
  • Hollywood has long warned about the possible dangers posed by artificial intelligence and robots, but a lab in Boston has a different hope for the future of these technologies. Michelle Miller has more.
    #news #ai #robot
    "CBS Saturday Morning" co-hosts Jeff Glor, Michelle Miller and Dana Jacobson deliver two hours of original reporting and breaking news, as well as profiles of leading figures in culture and the arts. Watch "CBS Saturday Morning" at 7 a.m. ET on CBS and 8 a.m. ET on the CBS News app.
    Subscribe to "CBS Mornings" on TH-cam: / cbsmornings
    Watch CBS News live: cbsn.ws/1PlLpZ7c​
    Download the CBS News app: cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8​
    Follow "CBS Mornings" on Instagram: bit.ly/3A13OqA
    Like "CBS Mornings" on Facebook: bit.ly/3tpOx00
    Follow "CBS Mornings" on Twitter: bit.ly/38QQp8B
    Subscribe to our newsletter: cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T​
    Try Paramount+ free: bit.ly/2OiW1kZ
    For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com

ความคิดเห็น • 46

  • @TeamCGS2005
    @TeamCGS2005 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Yeah they're right about the film industry talking about this for years. I remember watching the 1927 silent film Metropolis and being awestruck by how futuristic and forward thinking it was for the time.

  • @Pilotpaulie
    @Pilotpaulie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The day that your employer can replace you with a machine, they will.

  • @innerlocus
    @innerlocus 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Well, I just asked Alexa if I should worry about AI turning on me she said, There is no need to worry, yet.

    • @encarnacionvillazana3270
      @encarnacionvillazana3270 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They do say things like that..
      They're almost sentient, til that day happens, we can't say we weren't warned..

    • @innerlocus
      @innerlocus 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@encarnacionvillazana3270 Alexa said, there is no need to worry yet. So, when, Alexa, "Beware the Ides of October." 🤔 Just kidding. 🤣

    • @encarnacionvillazana3270
      @encarnacionvillazana3270 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @innerlocus
      Lol.
      Hey I have dark humor.
      I mean, I can imagine sex robots turning on their virgin owners in a bloody valentine date!
      But we never know what animals think, let alone our fellow man and woman.
      That being said, I feel sorry for those virgins when the robots turn on humans. Lol

  • @tomcessorsmo3737
    @tomcessorsmo3737 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Maybe it's time to replace the politicians with these dudes.

  • @alooga555
    @alooga555 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    5:06 The robot goes up the steps a lot better without tripping than someone famous we know. I bet it is a lot smarter, too.

    • @goarmysleepinthemud.
      @goarmysleepinthemud. 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Probably more trustworthy for the U.S that the fat orange one that gave nuclear secrets to North Korea too.

  • @619mark1
    @619mark1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’s called unforeseen consequences that could be catastrophic to humans

  • @brandiel_01
    @brandiel_01 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Good

  • @samzhao638
    @samzhao638 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Only takes one glitch.😅

    • @civilizeddiva
      @civilizeddiva 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or human error (i.e., M3GAN). Part of the storyline was the engineer forgot to add in the safety measures due to a rushed deadline

  • @davidmiller720
    @davidmiller720 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This really Krazy

  • @yvonneplant9434
    @yvonneplant9434 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm thinking of Battlestar Galactica or the Terminator.

  • @Dobbs6651
    @Dobbs6651 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Swarm of small bom drones that automatically target anything with a pulses. Governments are certainly looking into this

  • @fermentillc
    @fermentillc 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is only a good idea for the few.

  • @JV-NY987
    @JV-NY987 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bicentennial Man is that movie

  • @joy2000cyber
    @joy2000cyber 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If you want to know if robots will take over earth, just look at the aliens. The pilots of flying saucers are some big head midgets, biological entities. If robots were smart enough, they would have sent robots to abduct earthlings😂

    • @capitalistdingo
      @capitalistdingo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Some people think those guys are just fancy robots. Frankly I think they are fictional but if they were robots it would explain the lack of clothes and genitals.

  • @WhateverIwannaupload
    @WhateverIwannaupload 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    can any conscious person who does psalm 23 program a ai?

  • @KingAngel4Life
    @KingAngel4Life 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I always said man will outdo himself with AI and AI will outdo man. AI can’t pay taxes, circulate income to strengthen the economy, so I guess the rich will become poor once AI takes over and all humans will be equal. So I guess AI is needed in order to even the human heart.

  • @hugocastaneda2168
    @hugocastaneda2168 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why is the Matt Singer talking about A.I. threat for more than half the segment ? He is not an A.I. or even a computer researcher/engineer, he works in entertainement industry what does it have to do with down to the ground computer innovation and technology projection ? It's ok to dream and express fears and ideas through art and especially movies but when talking about true threats and future projections (for which research is actually conducted) i'd like to have quality people talking about it.

  • @nigeljohnson9820
    @nigeljohnson9820 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    AI is impressive, but it still cannot emulate all the functions of a simple insect, and it certainly cannot do that in the same size or energy utilisation.
    It's worth considering how effective an autonomous drone would be if it could emulate the intelligence of a mosquito. The AI of today maybe getting close to that of Vicky in Irobot, or HAL in 2001 a space odyssey. It might even be close to the Skynet central intelligence in the terminator, but it appears to be a long way from matching that of the Terminator or Sunny.

  • @mr1enrollment
    @mr1enrollment 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Solutions breed problems.

  • @tecngen
    @tecngen 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    👀🤖

  • @user-mn8bb2ky7k
    @user-mn8bb2ky7k 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Leider,kein,erfolg??????

  • @alexlin4108
    @alexlin4108 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Classic fear-mongering to get views

  • @aggressivelyrelaxing155
    @aggressivelyrelaxing155 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The thing I made is amazing! I promise can I keep funding?😂😂😂😂

  • @johnphantom
    @johnphantom 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You don't know how digital computers work if you think AI is going to become sentient. As evidence I will provide a short concise explanation of what AI is, using my 50+ years of computer experience:
    Artificial Intelligence will always be controlled by humans. AI cannot "think" or "plot" or "scheme" between taking input and interpreting it, they react; not act. AI doesn't dream like humans do - that is inputless "acting" and not "reacting". AI does not have an "imagination", it cannot come up with anything entirely new. AI does not reconsider data it already has processed, which is a basic function of the human brain. AI does what it was trained to do. The oldest axiom of digital computing applies here too; GIGO or Garbage In, Garbage Out. They are just imitations that deceptively act "sentient". Digital computers are deterministic machines; AI has rules and is based in the logic of Boolean algebra working on binary - something that does not occur in nature. The quantitative rules of AI are the logic of Connectionism used in an Artificial Neural Network. There is another fundamental difference: digital computers do not have a randomizer, they are all pseudo randomization, and we don't understand the "randomization" of the wave function of quantum physics. You are not an advanced iPhone. That doesn't mean AI won't take 99.99% of jobs within 50 years, it just means that AI will NEVER be "human" in ability. There will always be central places controlling the most advanced AI. Right now ChatGPT 4.0 has more than twice the artificial neurons as a human adult brain's natural neurons and costs $700k a day to support. ChatGPT isn't even near the ballpark to take a swing at something like "I, Robot". If you are interested in diving deeper in what the subcategory of what chatbot AI is, look into Large Language Models or LLMs.

    • @bakedbeans3181
      @bakedbeans3181 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤭😄 ai way past sentience, ones who run this place, rofl.....phantom nothing, 💩

    • @bakedbeans3181
      @bakedbeans3181 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What's a quantum n how does it work, rhetorical question demon boy, gave up on ur false quotes n heading to ai, ...psst 0-2 😆

    • @bakedbeans3181
      @bakedbeans3181 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      3 mos ago, not 1 agrees w u 😁

  • @jarrodyuki7081
    @jarrodyuki7081 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ninja robot robocop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @peterlongprong7521
    @peterlongprong7521 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Elon Musk: "Ai will be the death of us all"
    also Elon Musk: "Hey, look at my new line of killer robots !"

  • @jarrodyuki7081
    @jarrodyuki7081 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    fyodor soren nietsche creatign your own values...................

  • @DeusShaggy
    @DeusShaggy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No machine shall be made in the likeness of the human mind.

  • @sillywabbit7989
    @sillywabbit7989 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    20 years and the same "parkour" robots... from Boston Dynamics....
    One big scam.

  • @guineapigzed
    @guineapigzed 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It Y2K all over again.
    Note this guys face.
    If it goes bad, he goes on the front of my car.