DeepVNA 101 - Overview

[@IZ0MFI]

I'm referring to the first version of the 2.8 inch nanoVna which really only has 201 points but scans the screen in a short enough time to allow calibrations of the device under test with negligible delay almost in real time and most importantly costs only a few dollars, in contrast to the much higher performance version "F-v3"

[@N7SIX]

@@IZ0MFI I understand, there's a difference with the hardware and firmware between the 2 vnas. Old and new arw incomparable.

[@herbmasonjr.8173]

Very Nice! - Thank You!

[@SparrowHawkPilot]

excellent intro and description.

[@neilfoster814]

I have one of these, they are much better than the Nano VNA, the bigger screen and rotary encoder make things much easier. A great bit of kit for the amateur radio enthusiast.

[@RStephenLegge]

Too dark to see

[@zerobow9413]

Dude turn the lights on....

[@3TQVK]

looking on a 140"screen Cant see it Mate Too Dark !!!!!

[@IZ0MFI]

It's slower than old nanoVna

[@N7SIX]

@@IZ0MFI which old vna, and what is the max point you are talking about? Old vna has only 201P.

[@IZ0MFI]

@@N7SIX I'm referring to the first version of the 2.8 inch nanoVna which really only has 201 points but scans the screen in a short enough time to allow calibrations of the device under test with negligible delay almost in real time and most importantly costs only a few dollars, in contrast to the much higher performance version "nanoVnaF v3" ;-) 73' Marco

[@IZ0MFI]

@@N7SIX I'm referring to the first version of the 2.8 inch nanoVna which really only has 201 points but scans the screen in a short enough time to allow calibrations of the device under test with negligible delay almost in real time and most importantly costs only a few dollars, in contrast to the much higher performance version "FV3"

[@bsuyono]

Too dark bro

[@N7SIX]

yes, my bad.

[@alexandertrofimov8900]

Темно

[@_Farsh]

Deads dimamic in partya