A couple suggestions: 1) When you have the clip of your initial review, you may want to put some text or other indication on the screen of "This part is not me talking right now" or something. It may help avoid confusion since the background and your voice don't change during that segment. 2) I like the idea of having the "Worst Card" between your picks 2 and 1. It helps build the suspense of seeing what your #1 will be, and it also helps end the video on a more... "serious" note. It's personal preference and just a suggestion. These things being said, I *love* your videos! Please continue making these forever.
Here's a thought: Make a positional ice that replaces the positional effect with something else when it's the innermost piece of ice. Even if it's just a subroutine that says "put this in the outermost position on this server" or something. Just to make it not completely meaningless when drawn early. It wouldn't even be a clunkier text than Mausolus.
I really like the idea of ice that move around. My suggestion in the original review was "all ice has +3 strength for the remainder of the turn." This would still be pretty weak in the early game as your only ice but could do something on a facecheck/as the innermost piece if you have a couple of pieces installed.
Concerning the positional ICE: could a card like Red Tape be useful if the ratio were something more along the lines of 2 credits for 8 strength, or 10? Alternatively, what if it had five subs and each sub adding 1 strength? I like positional ICE as an idea but the reward has to be more commensurate with the risks of including them in a deck. Thanks for the great overview!
Both of these suggestions are good improvements to the cost-to-break vs icebreakers but do not deal with the positional ice issue. I'd prefer something like "all ice has +3 strength for the remainder of the turn." This would still be better in a good position but could do something relevant on a facecheck/as the innermost piece.
![เปิดใจ "อาจารย์เบียร์ คนตื่นธรรม" อดีตเคยสุดทุกทาง ถ้าใช้หนี้หมดไปบวชแน่ l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IxeE0xVhy08/mqdefault.jpg)
![⭐ฮิตในTikTok!! ( มะมะมะหมูเด้ง MooDeng ) Ver. แดนซ์ ReMix BY [ ดีเจกิต รีมิกซ์ ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4noyAoMa7bQ/mqdefault.jpg)
been out of the meta for a while- this video was a great recap. top work as always!
Glad I could help!
A couple suggestions:
1) When you have the clip of your initial review, you may want to put some text or other indication on the screen of "This part is not me talking right now" or something. It may help avoid confusion since the background and your voice don't change during that segment.
2) I like the idea of having the "Worst Card" between your picks 2 and 1. It helps build the suspense of seeing what your #1 will be, and it also helps end the video on a more... "serious" note. It's personal preference and just a suggestion.
These things being said, I *love* your videos! Please continue making these forever.
Thanks for the suggestions and the kind words! I'll try putting a border around the lookback clip and the date of the clip.
Here's a thought: Make a positional ice that replaces the positional effect with something else when it's the innermost piece of ice. Even if it's just a subroutine that says "put this in the outermost position on this server" or something. Just to make it not completely meaningless when drawn early. It wouldn't even be a clunkier text than Mausolus.
Compare curtain wall, which does see play, though only in niche BS decks. That has a positional bonus, but is still useful on the inside.
It would be very Jinteki too.
I really like the idea of ice that move around.
My suggestion in the original review was "all ice has +3 strength for the remainder of the turn." This would still be pretty weak in the early game as your only ice but could do something on a facecheck/as the innermost piece if you have a couple of pieces installed.
Concerning the positional ICE: could a card like Red Tape be useful if the ratio were something more along the lines of 2 credits for 8 strength, or 10?
Alternatively, what if it had five subs and each sub adding 1 strength? I like positional ICE as an idea but the reward has to be more commensurate with the risks of including them in a deck.
Thanks for the great overview!
Both of these suggestions are good improvements to the cost-to-break vs icebreakers but do not deal with the positional ice issue. I'd prefer something like "all ice has +3 strength for the remainder of the turn." This would still be better in a good position but could do something relevant on a facecheck/as the innermost piece.
you should make a video for the top *years* of netrunner, the year with the most faction and id diversity...cool vid
I like the idea, but there haven't been that many years of Netrunner. I was thinking about doing a top 10 list for 2013. Does that sound interesting?
Just a heads up some of the text next to the cards from '23 seconds' say they came out in January
Good catch, thanks.
could u give me a link to a runner deck building video