I appreciate re-uploads of high signal material but I agree they should include a timestamp. Very annoying. It also isn't fair to Lustig. He should get the credit that comes with being early as well as the allowance for potential changes in his point of view since then. People don't get to make these judgements if they don't know the time of publishing and many newcomers to this area of human thought and study will probably assume it is a recent presentation.
There is some indication of the year of publishing in the video description: "... His new book Fat Chance: beating the odds against sugar, processed food, obesity, and disease is due to be released in January 2013." However why not include the year, month and day or even just the year in the video title and in the video description? I don't see a good reason not to, and good reasons to do it.
@@SonnyDarvish I'm only going by what he said here, and this video was just put up recently. Do you have anything more recent from him that disputes it?
This is from something like 10 years ago. All of us would appreciate knowing the date and the location of such a presentation.
I agree, he looks relatively young in this. I really dislike when YT channels upload old videos fir the sake of the algorithm.
@@TyRaff you're being silly, these people are uploading their archive, show some respect and intelligence!
I appreciate re-uploads of high signal material but I agree they should include a timestamp. Very annoying. It also isn't fair to Lustig. He should get the credit that comes with being early as well as the allowance for potential changes in his point of view since then. People don't get to make these judgements if they don't know the time of publishing and many newcomers to this area of human thought and study will probably assume it is a recent presentation.
There is some indication of the year of publishing in the video description:
"... His new book Fat Chance: beating the odds against sugar, processed food, obesity, and disease is due to be released in January 2013."
However why not include the year, month and day or even just the year in the video title and in the video description? I don't see a good reason not to, and good reasons to do it.
In the very first slide at 0:09, it stated August 11, 2012. That's almost 12 years ago.
Instead of gun control as an example of a major social problem initiative he should have said treatment of mental illness
He's still stuck on the falsehood that fiber is necessary.
This presentation is from August 2012. Is he then (2012) or now (2024) still stuck in that mindset?
@@SonnyDarvish I'm only going by what he
said here, and this video was just put up recently.
Do you have anything more recent from him that
disputes it?
And you’re still stuck on incorrect information.
@@barrysmith8193 And you have some evidence that
he has changed his view on fiber? Let us know.