The Problem with the lost girl is, that it doesn't make Sense from a Story standpoint. Because in the World of Peter Pan girls are simply too Smart to Fall out of their cribs.
I feel like Wendy being more “active” in the live-action takes away from her character. She’s supposed to be the mature child in the group and teaches the boys to grow up instead of staying as wild kids. The “it’s updated for modern audiences” excuse is stupid.
Indeed. It does take away from her character in the story. She was supposed to teach the boys how to be mature. She’s at a time of her life where she’s expected to act grown up but is still pressed by her brothers to remain childish.
@@riotkitty that’s why I only like the live-action Cinderella since they stayed true to the story and characters without drastically changing anything for the worse.
I thought Wendy was the best character in the film and she’s my favorite character in the film and my favorite Disney live action character and heroine. Ever Anderson is the standout in the film and the best Wendy we’ve ever gotten in any Peter Pan adaptation. Sure she’s bratty at the beginning and slaps Peter Pan at one point but she cares deeply about her brothers and the lost boys and Tinkerbell and Tiger Lily and even Peter Pan she even goes so far as to sacrifice herself to save her brothers and the lost boys so they’d grow up to be good pirates and be spared so she takes their place to walk the plank
If you guys want a good live action peter pan I recommend the one from around 2003. Great effects for the time,amazing acting from the kids and adults, emotional, and with some really profound stuff for a kids movie, and the natives and princess tiger lily are cast by actual native amaerican actors and speak their own actual language. Tigerlily curses out hook and its epic. It takes so cool changes, like the idea that Wendy is attracted to the idea of being a pirate and almost betrays peter, the mermaids are evil, hook and smee and the othe4 pirates are actually competent and threatening. It's amazibg
That one will forever be my favourite live action adaptation. I watched that so much as a kid. I only wish I could find it today on a streaming service. 👍🏻😊
The problem with a lot of these remakes is that they take themselves way too seriously, especially with these dark, cold settings, like Smarty mentioned. With the cast of Hook for example, you could tell they were having fun on the set.
What's really sad is them basically ripping off their own work. They should have done something new with the IP, because without a doubt the 2015 "Pan" movie was the best interpretation of the character. A retelling of his origin story, how he was born, who his parents were, how he has magic, how he met and befriended a young hook. Also it had way better special effects. It was just amazing but I don't think many liked it that much but hopefully because if this movie, people will appreciate it more. Hey you should check out that movie if you want something else.
Hey, I've watched that movie. It wasn't bad; I liked that it tried to do something different with the concept, and Peter's actor was great imo. But I was disappointed with the visuals because it didn't have the fantastical vibe I would expect from Neverland. I liked the 2003 movie more, but the darker tone was interesting.
Disney should be taking notes from Puss in boots the last wish. First off Animation isn’t just for kids,a lot of adults will watch the Disney classics with their kids over the remakes the remakes don’t hold a candle to the classic stories. Second you can get away with so much more in animation I know it’s over said but it’s true. Third, you don’t need a retelling of an old story there are so many ways to make a new one without repeating everything. As for the last wish,I think Disney should experiment more with animation again like they did in the past not just with hand drawn sketches, it’s obvious the CGI for the live action movies built up on nostalgia aren’t working out great or most the people who are working on them are bored and just want a pay check, but so far I think animation was more their style
Instead of awful live-action remakes, i want to see an animated version of Jack and the Beanstalk or Little red ridong hood by Disney. In 2D or 3D with new elements to the stories. I missed 2D animation. The classics are still beautiful with cute characters; Stitch, Simba, Mushu, Bambi etc. The music was epic, the action was fun, the drama was well done. It's sad that there's not this style of animation in Pixar and Disney movies 😢At least Cartoon Saloon is here with creative stories! The compagnie knows how to make good movies and animation! I hope it will return in the futur!
It's funny you mention that because originally we were supposed to get adaption of Jack and the beanstalk it's called gigantic anyone supposed to feature a giant little girl but it got canceled
I think no matter how bad the movie is, a lot of people in my country will still watch it. Because a lot of the backgrounds and stuff was filmed in our small country. It’s the same as when the last James Bond movie was made, there were also shots filmed in our country. With a small population of 53000 people, you can imagine how excited people are when big movie studios come here to take movie shots. In fact the shot at 2:14 is taken close to where I live. Those two rock formations are known as the Giant and the Witch, we have a lot of folklore here. The short version of their story is they were trying to pull one of our islands to a different location, and they would always hide under the sea during daylight. But one day they were not under the sea and the sun turned them to stone, making them stay in the same location for all eternity. English is my 3rd language, so sorry for my bad English. But that story was basically the gist of the tale.
Still, if your country is small, that wouldn't give Disney so much profits so not problem Also the movie will be in Disney + so maybe the people from your country will see the movie practically FREE.
Your country looks beautiful! The problem lays in the definition of Neverland being a magical island where everything happens at the same time. This coast is EPIC, in a solemn, mature way. Fit for Lord of the Rings or some medieval Shakespearean drama. But not really fit for a childrens dream land...
@@internetkurator9256 I heard one of the Lord of the Rings was planned to be filmed in my country, but then they decided to do it somewhere else. I don’t remember which one of the movies it was, since this is information I heard years ago
I honestly can’t be surprised that they’re continuing to make these wretched, soulless adaptations of Disney classics despite the backlash against them. I mean, we’re talking about the same company that made awful straight-to-DVD sequels that nobody asked for for a decade and a half. Greedy mega-corporations will just continue to do what’s comfortable and cheap until it stops lining their pockets with money. smh
At least the sequels tried to do something new with the characters even if most of them were pretty bad. A few of them were actually pretty good films.
Peter pan 2003 was more respectful to the characters then this remake. She is kind AND brave in the 2003 version. She is curious and likes adventure which is cute. Here, Wendy is super serious and strong; like Mulan in her horrible remake. Thank's for making this charming character boring Disney, it's so nice of you 😐 Hook looks too pretty and boring in this remake. He is supposed to be scary and a bit ugly, not the opposite. The pirate was more intimidating and cool in the 2003 movie AND in Hook too! He was even funny in this movie like he was in the original. An entertaining villain! Can't say the same for this new version. I'm saying that and i only saw the trailer two times.
Disney should be used to criticism for bad choices by now. The comments under the trailer have been turned off, erasing tons of negative feedback. The dislike ratio and criticisms like this can't be handled so easily.
I honestly don't see a problem with them remaking Peter Pan. The original movie is from the 1950s. If some stories are allowed to be remade, I dont see why this can't be either. As long as it's executed well, then maybe a lot of kids will like it. Maybe an animated remake would've been better, though, 2d or CGI. It would probably have a better chance of sticking around, since everyone knows Disney as an ~animation~ studio. It would look really pretty, if anything
@@thecarebearsandcecfan2002 And it is not "original". Nothing Disney ever did was original. They ripped the classic European fairy tales and stories in the public domain and then copyrighted them for maximising profits.
They can but they need to try to stick to the original movie. How is it that the 2003 Peter Pan’s Hook looks more like Hook than the one made by Disney? They didn’t even try 😒. Hook is one of the biggest characters in the movie, you can’t boring down his wardrobe.
@@adamlambboy8332 I think it's fine to divert from the original movie if it's to improve it (story wise and aesthetically for live action or CGI) I hope they do remakes of their less popular movies though, and that the remakes were CGI rather than live action.
I Wish These Remakes would finally Stop! I hated almost all of them an I'm still Mad about that awful Pinocchio Remake! I don't even wanna know what they'll do to the Story of Peter Pan!
Hm, fair and valid points and opinions, but still a Trailer can only tell you so much, so there could still be a surprise in-store, Still, it’s too bad that this Trailer doesn’t hold up much confidence, I guess we’ll see how it goes when comes out, when is it coming out? Did we get that?
Honestly? I think I'll enjoy this one more than The Little Mermaid remake. Not that either one is going to be stellar, but I'll at least be able to sit through this one without cringing at the terrible CGI every five minutes.
Yes I was only kidding 😂, although if they say Tomas Astruc truly is the director of this movie. It would be the perfect excuse as to why this movie is doomed to fail before it even releases.
Ok let me say:there are good child actors out there HOWEVER they should had choosen the good ones and not visually "good" because it is nerving that instead of quality again they went for "quantity",so my theory is they didnt had the budget to cast better child actors...which i would believe by the visuals of this movie
All major female characters are better in Peter and Wendy. From Wendy herself, Tiger Lily (character development and bigger role) to Tinker Bell who is much less vengeful.
You know, this is a film I'm okay with being remade, given the original film's release was a long time ago and it's offensive depiction of Native Americans. But story-wise, it doesn't seem to be improved.
4:07 Younger me might agree with that. But no there are real problems there is nothing wrong with a movie being on the nose depending on the property. Also its two lines.
"it doesn't bother me" why not, its inaccurate to the lore just for the sake of political messaging that ironically for this story makes it worse and actually detracts from it (cause characters have to be dumb to wind up in neverland so whoops there disney) media hopes people don't mind so they can make them comfortable to anything they sell to them all woke messaging and agenda pushing to make themselves look better for "diversity" which it isn't cause they're gonna be one note caricatures that barely have lines and vanish, but also makes wendy meaningless cause she's not the unique character anymore media will label disliking cheap changes as being a bigot or phobic but its just cheap labels, never worry about that
The thing is that this film just smells average from a mile away. I havent watched a Disney live-action remake since Beauty and the Beast. And I dont care. I'll probably watch the Cinderella and Aladdin ones (eventually) since they seemed a bit more interesting. For this film, I found it funny hearing that girls are canonically too clever to be lost boys, hence the lost boys, but I suppose this is another step forward in gender equality; girls are just as dumb as boys. I dont remember if it was in the book, since I haven't read it in over a decade, but I find it hilarious that they changed it here. Captain Hook looks disappointing. The only interesting thing about him is that he knew Wendy's full name. That was neat, and a little creepy. Honestly, the only thing I feel remotely interested in watching is the aspect of the Native American tribe, since I've become quite a bit more interested in learning about other cultures. This is going to be the biggest improvement from the animated version. Side thought: Tinker Bell attempted murder and later betrayed her friends when she was sent into time-out for said attempted murder. This is in the book and animated version. Will modern Disney just erase it? Is it too dark? Food for thought. But yeah, I almost certainly won't watch the whole movie. I might skim through it. Maybe it'll be good, like a slightly worse version of one of the Narnia films. I love those.
They destroy big beb a zero out of ten for defacing a london landmark, meh on Tinkerbell not being a blondie she has a film franchise she is iconic, oh well enjoy the bargain basement yoy latest demake
![Why Return to Never Land is a Superior Sequel [Peter Pan 2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FlLqiCnzwQ4/mqdefault.jpg)
The Problem with the lost girl is, that it doesn't make Sense from a Story standpoint. Because in the World of Peter Pan girls are simply too Smart to Fall out of their cribs.
Really shot themselves with that one. They had a chance to tell a message but they shot themselves in the foot.
Kinda based lmao
Should have just called them lost kids if they had a problem with them all being boys. This just doesn't work.
@@everythinggirly916 honestly ikr😭
so...
edit- is a joke
I feel like Wendy being more “active” in the live-action takes away from her character. She’s supposed to be the mature child in the group and teaches the boys to grow up instead of staying as wild kids. The “it’s updated for modern audiences” excuse is stupid.
Indeed. It does take away from her character in the story. She was supposed to teach the boys how to be mature. She’s at a time of her life where she’s expected to act grown up but is still pressed by her brothers to remain childish.
@@everythinggirly916 but there was a reason why there were only lost boys since the girls were “too clever” to fall out of their cribs.
@@riotkitty that’s why I only like the live-action Cinderella since they stayed true to the story and characters without drastically changing anything for the worse.
I thought Wendy was the best character in the film and she’s my favorite character in the film and my favorite Disney live action character and heroine. Ever Anderson is the standout in the film and the best Wendy we’ve ever gotten in any Peter Pan adaptation. Sure she’s bratty at the beginning and slaps Peter Pan at one point but she cares deeply about her brothers and the lost boys and Tinkerbell and Tiger Lily and even Peter Pan she even goes so far as to sacrifice herself to save her brothers and the lost boys so they’d grow up to be good pirates and be spared so she takes their place to walk the plank
4:01 "The most progressive stories are just progressive. They don't show it off,they just are."
Exactly 💯
Doctor Who pre-Chibnull is a great example
Truly a sentence that modern film directors need to hear
The Pinocchio remake makes Pinocchio a true story feel like a masterpiece by comparison.
Well at least Guillermo del Toro actually gave us a good Pinocchio film after those two disappointed everyone.
But where is the crocodile? I just want the crocodile! Tick Tock Disney!
That's just one of the biggest mistakes they're making with this movie
is going to look like purrolyth (anorexic indoraptor)
@@Maretoast Or it could be a Deinosuchus. Who knows?
Live action direct to Disney plus is the equivalent to straight to VHS sequels from the 90s to early 2000s
Which is exactly why I say "don't bother". If they do a bad remake, the original still exists; people can choose to watch that instead.
I liked the part when the movie shouldn't have existed in the first place. My entire theatre ERUPTED when that happened.
You mean when it "didn't".
The movie will be for Disney + so maybe you would change the "theatre" for "tv". But yeah it doesn't matter xd that was a good joke
If you guys want a good live action peter pan I recommend the one from around 2003. Great effects for the time,amazing acting from the kids and adults, emotional, and with some really profound stuff for a kids movie, and the natives and princess tiger lily are cast by actual native amaerican actors and speak their own actual language. Tigerlily curses out hook and its epic. It takes so cool changes, like the idea that Wendy is attracted to the idea of being a pirate and almost betrays peter, the mermaids are evil, hook and smee and the othe4 pirates are actually competent and threatening. It's amazibg
That one will forever be my favourite live action adaptation. I watched that so much as a kid. I only wish I could find it today on a streaming service. 👍🏻😊
It also has a killer soundtrack. Fairy Dance is so good 😭😭
The problem with a lot of these remakes is that they take themselves way too seriously, especially with these dark, cold settings, like Smarty mentioned. With the cast of Hook for example, you could tell they were having fun on the set.
What's really sad is them basically ripping off their own work. They should have done something new with the IP, because without a doubt the 2015 "Pan" movie was the best interpretation of the character. A retelling of his origin story, how he was born, who his parents were, how he has magic, how he met and befriended a young hook. Also it had way better special effects. It was just amazing but I don't think many liked it that much but hopefully because if this movie, people will appreciate it more.
Hey you should check out that movie if you want something else.
It was also very dark and gritty as well.
Hey, I've watched that movie. It wasn't bad; I liked that it tried to do something different with the concept, and Peter's actor was great imo. But I was disappointed with the visuals because it didn't have the fantastical vibe I would expect from Neverland. I liked the 2003 movie more, but the darker tone was interesting.
Disney should be taking notes from Puss in boots the last wish.
First off Animation isn’t just for kids,a lot of adults will watch the Disney classics with their kids over the remakes the remakes don’t hold a candle to the classic stories.
Second you can get away with so much more in animation I know it’s over said but it’s true.
Third, you don’t need a retelling of an old story there are so many ways to make a new one without repeating everything.
As for the last wish,I think Disney should experiment more with animation again like they did in the past not just with hand drawn sketches, it’s obvious the CGI for the live action movies built up on nostalgia aren’t working out great or most the people who are working on them are bored and just want a pay check, but so far I think animation was more their style
They're likely to not. But if they don't, we still can.
Instead of awful live-action remakes, i want to see an animated version of Jack and the Beanstalk or Little red ridong hood by Disney. In 2D or 3D with new elements to the stories. I missed 2D animation. The classics are still beautiful with cute characters; Stitch, Simba, Mushu, Bambi etc. The music was epic, the action was fun, the drama was well done. It's sad that there's not this style of animation in Pixar and Disney movies 😢At least Cartoon Saloon is here with creative stories! The compagnie knows how to make good movies and animation! I hope it will return in the futur!
It's funny you mention that because originally we were supposed to get adaption of Jack and the beanstalk it's called gigantic anyone supposed to feature a giant little girl but it got canceled
4:14 I never thought I would see Finn from Adventure Time in Peter Pan.
I think no matter how bad the movie is, a lot of people in my country will still watch it. Because a lot of the backgrounds and stuff was filmed in our small country. It’s the same as when the last James Bond movie was made, there were also shots filmed in our country. With a small population of 53000 people, you can imagine how excited people are when big movie studios come here to take movie shots.
In fact the shot at 2:14 is taken close to where I live. Those two rock formations are known as the Giant and the Witch, we have a lot of folklore here. The short version of their story is they were trying to pull one of our islands to a different location, and they would always hide under the sea during daylight. But one day they were not under the sea and the sun turned them to stone, making them stay in the same location for all eternity. English is my 3rd language, so sorry for my bad English. But that story was basically the gist of the tale.
This was really interesting, thanks for sharing! Your home is beautiful 😊
Still, if your country is small, that wouldn't give Disney so much profits so not problem
Also the movie will be in Disney + so maybe the people from your country will see the movie practically FREE.
Your country looks beautiful! The problem lays in the definition of Neverland being a magical island where everything happens at the same time. This coast is EPIC, in a solemn, mature way. Fit for Lord of the Rings or some medieval Shakespearean drama. But not really fit for a childrens dream land...
@@internetkurator9256 I heard one of the Lord of the Rings was planned to be filmed in my country, but then they decided to do it somewhere else. I don’t remember which one of the movies it was, since this is information I heard years ago
I honestly can’t be surprised that they’re continuing to make these wretched, soulless adaptations of Disney classics despite the backlash against them.
I mean, we’re talking about the same company that made awful straight-to-DVD sequels that nobody asked for for a decade and a half. Greedy mega-corporations will just continue to do what’s comfortable and cheap until it stops lining their pockets with money. smh
At least the sequels tried to do something new with the characters even if most of them were pretty bad. A few of them were actually pretty good films.
Even when you put sparkles on garbage, it's STILL garbage
And that's what "Peter Pan and Wendy" is guilty of
Bullseye
Disneys remakes seem more like knock offs
It really does feel like it.
You know it's shit when they forcefully add "& Wendy" in the title.
Did anyone else remember Peter Pan live? The play that streamed live in the 2010’s
Peter pan 2003 was more respectful to the characters then this remake. She is kind AND brave in the 2003 version. She is curious and likes adventure which is cute. Here, Wendy is super serious and strong; like Mulan in her horrible remake. Thank's for making this charming character boring Disney, it's so nice of you 😐
Hook looks too pretty and boring in this remake. He is supposed to be scary and a bit ugly, not the opposite. The pirate was more intimidating and cool in the 2003 movie AND in Hook too! He was even funny in this movie like he was in the original. An entertaining villain! Can't say the same for this new version. I'm saying that and i only saw the trailer two times.
Disney should be used to criticism for bad choices by now. The comments under the trailer have been turned off, erasing tons of negative feedback. The dislike ratio and criticisms like this can't be handled so easily.
If you know what kind of fallout happened on Twitter after someone posted a meme about it, you can see what kind of people they are
I am kind of excited for this movie but the peter pan 2003 film is by far my favorite live action adaption.
Peter pan: Sorry Jiminy. I shouldn't have slice your head off. And copy your game to much.
I wish Disney would make something original
Or they should adapt more fairytales instead of remaking the old ones.
@@everythinggirly916 that works too. Anything but these god awful remakes.
All I can think of when I hear of the Peter Pan remake, all I hear is Lois yelling “PETAAAAAH!!!!” At the thought of another unoriginal remake
I honestly don't see a problem with them remaking Peter Pan. The original movie is from the 1950s. If some stories are allowed to be remade, I dont see why this can't be either.
As long as it's executed well, then maybe a lot of kids will like it.
Maybe an animated remake would've been better, though, 2d or CGI. It would probably have a better chance of sticking around, since everyone knows Disney as an ~animation~ studio. It would look really pretty, if anything
Actually, the old Peter Pan was made in the 50s.
@@thecarebearsandcecfan2002 And it is not "original". Nothing Disney ever did was original. They ripped the classic European fairy tales and stories in the public domain and then copyrighted them for maximising profits.
They can but they need to try to stick to the original movie. How is it that the 2003 Peter Pan’s Hook looks more like Hook than the one made by Disney? They didn’t even try 😒. Hook is one of the biggest characters in the movie, you can’t boring down his wardrobe.
@@adamlambboy8332 I think it's fine to divert from the original movie if it's to improve it (story wise and aesthetically for live action or CGI) I hope they do remakes of their less popular movies though, and that the remakes were CGI rather than live action.
@@thecarebearsandcecfan2002 Oh yeah my bad lol ~ I get the dates mixed up sometimes for the 40s and 50s movies😭
This is gonna make Pan from 2015 look like Spielberg's Hook
I Wish These Remakes would finally Stop! I hated almost all of them an I'm still Mad about that awful Pinocchio Remake! I don't even wanna know what they'll do to the Story of Peter Pan!
Hm, fair and valid points and opinions, but still a Trailer can only tell you so much, so there could still be a surprise in-store,
Still, it’s too bad that this Trailer doesn’t hold up much confidence,
I guess we’ll see how it goes when comes out, when is it coming out? Did we get that?
7:19 If they cut out that plot point entirely, someone is bound to get offended. It’s a lose-lose situation 🤷🏻♀️
Never heard of this until you made a video on it.
I just wanted a Disney Fairies animated reboot, not this.
Honestly? I think I'll enjoy this one more than The Little Mermaid remake. Not that either one is going to be stellar, but I'll at least be able to sit through this one without cringing at the terrible CGI every five minutes.
I can’t wait for Jude Law take his own version of hook
Ladies and gentlemen directed by Tomas Astruc, Peter pan and Wendy
Oh god i hope this is a joke, his miraculous ladybug show lost quality in the second season...
@@andrewshearsby8125 bro it didn't have quality in the FIRST season
Yes I was only kidding 😂, although if they say Tomas Astruc truly is the director of this movie. It would be the perfect excuse as to why this movie is doomed to fail before it even releases.
@@bulliet3608ehh it was okay in season one , but the cracks weren't as bad, then it got worst
@@bulliet3608 an additional reason not to watch it if so :P
Ok let me say:there are good child actors out there HOWEVER they should had choosen the good ones and not visually "good" because it is nerving that instead of quality again they went for "quantity",so my theory is they didnt had the budget to cast better child actors...which i would believe by the visuals of this movie
Let's hope they don't decide to redo Toy Story
All major female characters are better in Peter and Wendy. From Wendy herself, Tiger Lily (character development and bigger role) to Tinker Bell who is much less vengeful.
We don’t know it’s trash yet
The Lion King remake sucks
You know, this is a film I'm okay with being remade, given the original film's release was a long time ago and it's offensive depiction of Native Americans. But story-wise, it doesn't seem to be improved.
Just cut out the Native Americans and keep everything else the same. The animated film was fine the way it was.
@@tototats16 Why erase what little representation NAs get in major motion pictures?
4:07 Younger me might agree with that. But no there are real problems there is nothing wrong with a movie being on the nose depending on the property. Also its two lines.
ill judge it when i see it if im not interested in the first parts im not going to even sit and watch the rest
By the way, have you heard that a Peter Pan Horror Movie is planned?
Where did you get the info from?
"it doesn't bother me" why not, its inaccurate to the lore just for the sake of political messaging that ironically for this story makes it worse and actually detracts from it (cause characters have to be dumb to wind up in neverland so whoops there disney) media hopes people don't mind so they can make them comfortable to anything they sell to them
all woke messaging and agenda pushing to make themselves look better for "diversity" which it isn't cause they're gonna be one note caricatures that barely have lines and vanish, but also makes wendy meaningless cause she's not the unique character anymore
media will label disliking cheap changes as being a bigot or phobic but its just cheap labels, never worry about that
Hook is a way better remake than this
Robin Williams is Peter Pan in it! Oh and the 2003 version with Malfoy.
It is a nice what if sequel that asks what if Peter Pan left Neverland, grew up and forgot his memories of that area?
@@Thomasmemoryscentral yes with Robin Williams
The thing is that this film just smells average from a mile away. I havent watched a Disney live-action remake since Beauty and the Beast. And I dont care. I'll probably watch the Cinderella and Aladdin ones (eventually) since they seemed a bit more interesting.
For this film, I found it funny hearing that girls are canonically too clever to be lost boys, hence the lost boys, but I suppose this is another step forward in gender equality; girls are just as dumb as boys. I dont remember if it was in the book, since I haven't read it in over a decade, but I find it hilarious that they changed it here.
Captain Hook looks disappointing. The only interesting thing about him is that he knew Wendy's full name. That was neat, and a little creepy.
Honestly, the only thing I feel remotely interested in watching is the aspect of the Native American tribe, since I've become quite a bit more interested in learning about other cultures. This is going to be the biggest improvement from the animated version.
Side thought: Tinker Bell attempted murder and later betrayed her friends when she was sent into time-out for said attempted murder. This is in the book and animated version. Will modern Disney just erase it? Is it too dark? Food for thought. But yeah, I almost certainly won't watch the whole movie. I might skim through it. Maybe it'll be good, like a slightly worse version of one of the Narnia films. I love those.
They destroy big beb a zero out of ten for defacing a london landmark, meh on Tinkerbell not being a blondie she has a film franchise she is iconic, oh well enjoy the bargain basement yoy latest demake
Hi I think this could be a good Peter pan movie
So I am going to be positive about
Same go's for the little Mermaid
I’ll be nice and give it a-10
But they won't
You don’t even know if it’s bad yet, don’t judge before it comes out, it could be really good
I’m not watching any of them. There is an over saturation of Peter Pan stuff.
I love the PAN movie it was so cool but this no
Buen care Toto no hable tantasica
Yeah this movie sucked
THE REMAKE MOVIES ARE NOT TRASH. STOP BEING RACIST
First