Elizabeth didn’t use torture, her quad - made up of Christopher Hatton, Sir Francis Walsingham, William Cecil and Robert Dudley (but mostly Cecil and Walsingham) were in charge of that side of things. Also, Elizabeth only signed the death warrant for Mary under duress and she signed it and put it in a draw. Cecil stole it and she was executed the next day before Elizabeth could stop it EDIT: Mary I didn’t execute Lady Jane Grey to begin with, she only had her executed after the Wyatt Rebellion of 1554
1:54 Did you just say '1978-1013' instead of 978? Did Aethelred II start his reign in 1978 & somehow time travelled back in time & continued reigning until his death in 1013? XD
A lot of these are pretty harsh, like king john, his brother had left the country poor. Theres also Elizabeth who faced many major rebellions to put mary of scots on throne, and the Spanish/french
Correct about Elisabeth. she actually first was quite religiously tolerant. the executions all concerned people who were involved in plots to kill and overthrow her. no comparison to her sister Mary, who actually enjoyed seeing protestants burning just for the sake of it.
About John, basically agree. that's why no other English king ever choose the name John. but among him, i would also mention Edward II, Henry VI and Richard III.
Concerning Elizabeth I. You seemed to have omitted the fact that beheadings were the preferable method of execution was the same for 500 plus years as well as the use of torture to gain information on plots against her life, members of her household were executed due to their plotting against her (Mary Queen of Scots). If you’re going insult one of my country’s best and most celebrated monarchs, perhaps do your research and explain why things happened.
@@birkuru Furthermore, the only reason she was unable to sustain this tolerant view was due to the plotting of Catholics such as Roberto Ridolfi, Sir Francis Throckmorton & Anthony Babington to assassinate her, her placement on this list presents her executing of these Catholics & family members as unjustified, a complete sham.
BRUCE WILDE Evidence obtained by Walsingham and his spy network would contradict your argument that Elizabeth only did it on an assumption. Also she was also entitled to rule by an Act of Parliament passed in 1546 plus the Church of England would disagree with your thought that her parents marriage was not valid.
Very interesting. I bet some will complain that Richard III belongs here. I suspect, given your list includes 3 of the 5 Tudor monarchs, that you found his actual record blackened by the projection of a much more ruthless ruling family.
@@blackhokage1744 If she's related to the wife of Henry VII, Elizabeth of York, yes. That's presuming Elizabeth was a legitimate daughter. I don't know of any reason to question that, though.
John could be untrustworthy and vengeful, but he wasn't exceptionally cruel. He probably shouldn't even be on this list. He had powerful enemies in the French king, the Pope, and a bunch of seditious barons. Defeated by the French and blackmailed by the Pope, he was forced by the barons to sign the Magna Carta, which in its first iteration was intended to protect the rights of the barons and the Church. He was cultured and active, the first Norman king who familiarized himself with England and the first who could speak English. He took a personal interest in developing and improving the administration, and gave England its first fleet. He was not a bad king, but he was erratic and tended to lose his wars. He has had bad PR ever since.
As The Good Queen Gloriana or Elizabeth I is my most favorite Queen of all time she is the greatest Queen of England who ever lived. According to me she wasn't short tempered she was a very ambitious and a sweet tempered Queen. She only used torture to give punishments and to interrogate the criminals for their heinous crimes. God Save The Queen
because as a Queen you are not like an averge human, thye don't care about beibg cruel or not that's what average peasants think, they have the right, and obligation to do it, if wanting to keep your rule safe, her cousin mary was provably a threat, and most people wanted her dead
@@tiffanye9403 that's not really true. She knew exactly what she was signing, but she didn't intend to send it. She hadn't made up her mind so she signed it and locked it in a drawer but one of her advisors stole it, sent it and Mary was executed the next morning.
James II of Scotland, Henry II, Aethelred the Unready, Richard II, Edward I, Good Queen Bess, William the Conqueror, Bloody Mary, Henry VIII, King John
Interestingly, if I’m correct, Magna Carta needed King John’s approval, and John, not bothering to even read it, signed Magna Carta without realising that he had just agreed to have his his power over England be restrained, which was how King John became a constitutional monarchy. This is why England, and later, Britain, is a constitutional monarchy, not an absolute one. It’s also why Britain has never had an absolute monarchy, only monarchies that slowly became more constitutional.
He’s doing an awful 1980s radio host voice. Just speak naturally. Imagine if he spoke like this all the time in real life? Would be the most annoying person.
4:30 I don’t think Elizabeth was Cruel, she wasn’t evil or why will people called her the greatest Queen of England. She did not really wanted to kill Mary, Queen of Scott.
Elizabeth I was (comparatively) moderate by 16th Century standards. As an example, there were far fewer Catholic martyrs in her 46 year reign than Protestant martyrs during her sister Mary's 5-year reign. One could argue the Transatlantic Slave Trade began on her watch but much of the 'cruelty' in her reign was at the hands of powerful men in her counsel as opposed the Queen herself. Elizabeth had a temper but she was more tolerant than her contemporaries.
Why's John number 1 and Henry VIII two? John may have stolen land from the church, but Henry dissolved the monasteries and took that land as his own--not to mention doing everything John did in excess. Yes John had to sign the Magna Carta, but I'm not sure why that alone qualifies him as more tyrannical than Henry VIII.
That's harsh on henry II his words were will someone not ride me of this tiresome bishop...out of frustration not necessarily a desire for becket to die
I have great respect for King John as he is the great grandfather of Lady Jooan of Cornwall who married Sir John Howard whose great great great grandson became The Howard Duke of Norfolk
Henry 8th first marriage was annulled by the Pope. When he asked for a divorce from his 2nd marriage and the Pope refused, this was when he formed his own church.
I thought that Henry's first marriage was annulled because he argued that he shouldn't have been allowed to marry his dead brother's wife and the rhyme says: Divorced Beheaded Died Divorced Beheaded Survived
@@diddlyfiddle4405 can you tell me what exactly she did that was heinously comparable to the cruelties of her father and sister? (I'm genuinely asking for my knowledge, not being sarcastic)
Fajr Basit personally I don’t think she’s as bad as her father or sister but she did use torture quite a lot. She killed her innocent doctor because someone claimed he poisoned her
I can't help thinking King John gets something of a bad deal. He certainly was a predominately bad king - but his much celebrated brother Richard the Lionheart forbade women from his coronation, incited anti-Semitic riots and spent most of his reign on expensive Crusades, barely spending any time at home. At least John stayed in England.
You missed out Richard III. He was the youngest brother and his older brother was the King, however when his brother died, Richard's nephews were next in line to the throne. These two young princes were rumored to be killed in their sleep by correct me if im wrong but stabbed. It is said that the murder of the two princes were in the hands of richard as he ordered his men to kill the young boys to make himself the next person in line to the throne
It was was made up by shakespeare.He wrote this so he could impress Elizabeth I by giving her grandfather(Henry VII) was a good man for overthrowing Richard III
You can’t just generalise like this. King John was an excellent administrator, Elizabeth I was NOT a bloody thirsty murderer, and Æthelred the Unready was acting on the will of the people (as were most of the listed monarchs when they did ‘bad’ things).
THERE IS SOMETHING SEPARATE I HAVE TO SAY INVOLVES SUBJECT OF (BRITISH MONARCHS) Now first off, what if a small number of alternate realities the ten (British Monarchs) we know about are not horrible people; But instead the ones that exist in the alternate realities each one is a complete opposite of the ones that once existed in the true reality that we all exist in, and that includes the possibility that there might of been secretly skilled experts who knew how to handle dealing with horrible people without them selves coming close to becoming horrible people too.
You forgot Richard III, who murdered his nephews in order to keep the throne! Also, I don't think Elizabeth I deserves to be on the list. She didn't do anything a king of the time wouldn't have done too.
Some people say that Richard III wasn’t as bad as they say because William Shakespeare wrote those things in his play Richard III to impress Elizabeth I so she thought that her grandad Henry VII was right to take the throne after the war of the roses.
No he fucking didn't why would he murder the sons of the brother he worshipped when they had already been made illegitimate, it was more than likely Henry Tudors mother Margaret Beaufort who ordered the murders of the Princes in the Tower to clear the way for her son who had no legitimate claim to the throne & most of the bad stuff attributed to King Richard III has been proved to be Tudor propaganda
No don’t believe everything. Wouldn’t it make sense that his reputation is a result of him being defeated by an opposing family. History is written by the victors
Richard III was much more cruel than Elizabeth I and so should replace her on this list. As a minimum he had his little nephews killed so he could inherit the crown.
Elizabeth didn’t use torture, her quad - made up of Christopher Hatton, Sir Francis Walsingham, William Cecil and Robert Dudley (but mostly Cecil and Walsingham) were in charge of that side of things. Also, Elizabeth only signed the death warrant for Mary under duress and she signed it and put it in a draw. Cecil stole it and she was executed the next day before Elizabeth could stop it
EDIT: Mary I didn’t execute Lady Jane Grey to begin with, she only had her executed after the Wyatt Rebellion of 1554
Um. That's her.
I thought queen Elizabeth the first was the mother of the current Queen of England
@@blackhokage1744 no, that's Elizabeth the Queen Mother
Yes, and she signes it only after she knew that Mary actually WAS involved in the babington conspiracy, which clearly aimed at killing Elisabeth.
@@saintlysylas mary was the queens mother. Go do your homework
1:54 Did you just say '1978-1013' instead of 978? Did Aethelred II start his reign in 1978 & somehow time travelled back in time & continued reigning until his death in 1013? XD
Timelords. They aren't always nice.
I think he was talking about the EVIL queen Thatcher
Yes he did I was jus about to comment the same lol
Laurence Ellis isnt james ii reign in the 14 century
He started in 1978 and finished in 2013 not 1013
I had EVERYTHING crossed that you would show some Horrible Histories here. Thank you so much!
I thought the tilte read "cutest" I was like no
Georgia Loughran same
@@JimVonSchmittou 🤣
Georgia Loughran 🤣🤣🤣
Me to and it showed a picture of Elizabeth.
🙃🙃🙃🙃🙃🙃blah blah blah blah yayayaya
Aethelred II's sobriquet "the Unready" didn't mean he wasn't prepared. It was actually "the Unread" which meant poorly advised.
A lot of these are pretty harsh, like king john, his brother had left the country poor. Theres also Elizabeth who faced many major rebellions to put mary of scots on throne, and the Spanish/french
John lackland was the worst monarch in British history
Correct about Elisabeth. she actually first was quite religiously tolerant. the executions all concerned people who were involved in plots to kill and overthrow her. no comparison to her sister Mary, who actually enjoyed seeing protestants burning just for the sake of it.
About John, basically agree. that's why no other English king ever choose the name John. but among him, i would also mention Edward II, Henry VI and Richard III.
@@nwoudochiobinna3673 Not at all, Richard I, Edward II, Richard II, and Henry VI were worse.
Definitely would have included Henry I. He had his own granddaughters blinded and their noses cut off.
😱
OMG 😨, That's torture
I saw my face on the thumbnail, excuse me?
Concerning Elizabeth I. You seemed to have omitted the fact that beheadings were the preferable method of execution was the same for 500 plus years as well as the use of torture to gain information on plots against her life, members of her household were executed due to their plotting against her (Mary Queen of Scots). If you’re going insult one of my country’s best and most celebrated monarchs, perhaps do your research and explain why things happened.
True. She had a much tolerant view on her Catholic and Protestant subjects compared to the monarchs in France and Spain
@@birkuru Furthermore, the only reason she was unable to sustain this tolerant view was due to the plotting of Catholics such as Roberto Ridolfi, Sir Francis Throckmorton & Anthony Babington to assassinate her, her placement on this list presents her executing of these Catholics & family members as unjustified, a complete sham.
BRUCE WILDE She committed high treason, funnily enough that’s what happened whenever you plotted against the reigning monarch of the time.
BRUCE WILDE Evidence obtained by Walsingham and his spy network would contradict your argument that Elizabeth only did it on an assumption. Also she was also entitled to rule by an Act of Parliament passed in 1546 plus the Church of England would disagree with your thought that her parents marriage was not valid.
@@shaystone4275 why church of England left rome? why??
thank u this is interesting picks!
1:55 slip up in pronunciation of 978 when introducing Æthelred II.
Mph
Even though u got some stuff wrong, as a die hard Ricardian I'm super glad not to see King Richard III on this list
The White Rose ahh a fellow yorkist
Richard the third was a monster
@@nwoudochiobinna3673 monster like Rihanna ft eminem ?? 😆😅🤣
@@blackhokage1744 lol....
But seriously he was a scumbag
@@nwoudochiobinna3673 How was I a monster...
SPOILERS:
So, should Henry II really be on the list? He didn't intend to have the Archbishop killed, his men just didn't get that he was just venting.
😆😅😅🤣🤣
the list as to make up 10 people so henry ii is a filler
Venting? Vote him out.
Very interesting. I bet some will complain that Richard III belongs here. I suspect, given your list includes 3 of the 5 Tudor monarchs, that you found his actual record blackened by the projection of a much more ruthless ruling family.
Lisa Kazmier...long live the ‘YORKS’ true family to rule england😂
@@irfannurhan3524 is ER a york??
I was framed by them.
@@blackhokage1744 If she's related to the wife of Henry VII, Elizabeth of York, yes. That's presuming Elizabeth was a legitimate daughter. I don't know of any reason to question that, though.
Richard 3 did not kill the princes in the tower. That is Tudor propaganda
John could be untrustworthy and vengeful, but he wasn't exceptionally cruel. He probably shouldn't even be on this list. He had powerful enemies in the French king, the Pope, and a bunch of seditious barons. Defeated by the French and blackmailed by the Pope, he was forced by the barons to sign the Magna Carta, which in its first iteration was intended to protect the rights of the barons and the Church. He was cultured and active, the first Norman king who familiarized himself with England and the first who could speak English. He took a personal interest in developing and improving the administration, and gave England its first fleet. He was not a bad king, but he was erratic and tended to lose his wars. He has had bad PR ever since.
As The Good Queen Gloriana or Elizabeth I is my most favorite Queen of all time she is the greatest Queen of England who ever lived. According to me she wasn't short tempered she was a very ambitious and a sweet tempered Queen. She only used torture to give punishments and to interrogate the criminals for their heinous crimes. God Save The Queen
And she used corsairs to loot and kill, after which she received them in England as "heroes."
"According to me"...says it all!
Ethelred the Unready ruled from 1978?!? What does Queen Elizabeth II think about that? 😂
😆😅🤣🤣😆 the sovereign cant make a political statement
I love how you show clips from Braveheart and Elizabeth since they're some of the most historically inaccurate movies ever.
No offense, but why would Elizabeth I be known as “Good Queen Bess” if she was cruel. Also at the time, she would’ve been forced to have Mary beheaded
because as a Queen you are not like an averge human, thye don't care about beibg cruel or not
that's what average peasants think, they have the right, and obligation to do it, if wanting to keep your rule safe,
her cousin mary was provably a threat, and most people wanted her dead
Because she did a lot for the Protestants and brought England out of the grips of the Catholic Church after sister Bloody Mary
And she wasn’t forced more like tricked by her hands. She thought she would be signing something that would help her
I know I’m texting a lot but I love history you should watch weird history they do a lot of truth and it’s interesting
@@tiffanye9403 that's not really true. She knew exactly what she was signing, but she didn't intend to send it. She hadn't made up her mind so she signed it and locked it in a drawer but one of her advisors stole it, sent it and Mary was executed the next morning.
As punishment for John's cruelty all the toilets in the kingdom will be called Johns🚽
Actually the first flushing toilet was built by John Harrington
This is history via the National Enquirer.
James II of Scotland, Henry II, Aethelred the Unready, Richard II, Edward I, Good Queen Bess, William the Conqueror, Bloody Mary, Henry VIII, King John
Mary l who was Henry Vlll daughter. Was cruel yes. What about Mary Queen of Scots. I’ve heard she was just ax bad
Your wrong elizabeth 1 is one of the greatest monarch in english history she is very intelligent
LoL, so intelligent as not to get married or have a child, thus ending the Tudor dynasty.. She destroyed all that her father tried to preserve.
Ummm she supported the space trade and killed lots of people I swear y’all romanticize her too much
Interestingly, if I’m correct, Magna Carta needed King John’s approval, and John, not bothering to even read it, signed Magna Carta without realising that he had just agreed to have his his power over England be restrained, which was how King John became a constitutional monarchy. This is why England, and later, Britain, is a constitutional monarchy, not an absolute one. It’s also why Britain has never had an absolute monarchy, only monarchies that slowly became more constitutional.
Please do next Top 10 Worst things Mary The First has ever done
I give Mary I sympathy due to her father being the reason of what she became
Same
I don’t fully blame her father. After all, treason and traitors is the people’s fault, unless I have a fact wrong
My god that voiceover is annoying
A little bit
I think it's because he sounds like he has a cold and he drags his words
He’s doing an awful 1980s radio host voice. Just speak naturally. Imagine if he spoke like this all the time in real life? Would be the most annoying person.
Are they confusing Elizabeth I with Mary I????
Henry VIII was the cruelest monarch.😠😠😠
He introduced boiling alive people who had committed poisoning.
Elizabeth was not cruel she is known as one of the best queens England has ever had
@International Strategy but she is known as one of the best Queens. That's just fact.
at least you squeezed Horrible History in there
4:30 I don’t think Elizabeth was Cruel, she wasn’t evil or why will people called her the greatest Queen of England. She did not really wanted to kill Mary, Queen of Scott.
Lucifer is evil and he was the strongest angel and considered the greatest angel
Lady Jane Grey was not executed until her father plotted against Mary again.
Elizabeth I was (comparatively) moderate by 16th Century standards. As an example, there were far fewer Catholic martyrs in her 46 year reign than Protestant martyrs during her sister Mary's 5-year reign. One could argue the Transatlantic Slave Trade began on her watch but much of the 'cruelty' in her reign was at the hands of powerful men in her counsel as opposed the Queen herself. Elizabeth had a temper but she was more tolerant than her contemporaries.
Where is Richard iii
#9: Blackadder, staring Rowan Atkinson, clearly parodied off this king and archbishop.
Henry VIII's children were just as horrid as he was smh
2:02 - you mean, THAT 12-year-old
Why most the tudors there
This is just the royals (and parts of England), we might love the royal family now but they only have power because they had the strongest armies
King John no1 really? I can think of worst English monarchs than him like.... nah your right king John is the worst
Elizabeth I was NOT cruel. She was merciful, conscientious and LEGENDARY.
Why's John number 1 and Henry VIII two? John may have stolen land from the church, but Henry dissolved the monasteries and took that land as his own--not to mention doing everything John did in excess. Yes John had to sign the Magna Carta, but I'm not sure why that alone qualifies him as more tyrannical than Henry VIII.
John was a very dumb monarch tbh
So, did Aethelred II time-travel orrr....
Yes. I did infact, time travel!
When you look at the reasons why these monarchs were so bad, the only truly evil ones were john and mary
That's harsh on henry II his words were will someone not ride me of this tiresome bishop...out of frustration not necessarily a desire for becket to die
How iz liz i #5
The Middle Ages were sure violent times.
Clara I-M yeah, meaning that nobody is perfect, that the world is just morally grey completely.
Clara I-M um no this isn’t just the middle ages
@@SubaruImprezaWRXSti-fv8ng 🤯🤯🤯
I have great respect for King John as he is the great grandfather of Lady Jooan of Cornwall who married Sir John Howard whose great great great grandson became The Howard Duke of Norfolk
Henry 8th first marriage was annulled by the Pope. When he asked for a divorce from his 2nd marriage and the Pope refused, this was when he formed his own church.
False, he dispatched from the church trying to annul his marriage to Katherine of Aragon (his 1st wife)
@@jackgilbert1405 thank you, I always thought it was due to Anne Boleyn. I stand corrected.
I thought that Henry's first marriage was annulled because he argued that he shouldn't have been allowed to marry his dead brother's wife and the rhyme says:
Divorced
Beheaded
Died
Divorced
Beheaded
Survived
Tim Wodzynski yea just watch *the other Boleyn girl* movie it shows the whole thing and what happened
I have just been doing research via Wikipedia and it says that Pope never annulled the marriage but it was the Archbishop of Canterbury that did.
Does Elizabeth the 1st really belong here?
Nope
@@grandking8338 ikr!!
Fajr Basit she definitely does
@@diddlyfiddle4405 can you tell me what exactly she did that was heinously comparable to the cruelties of her father and sister? (I'm genuinely asking for my knowledge, not being sarcastic)
Fajr Basit personally I don’t think she’s as bad as her father or sister but she did use torture quite a lot. She killed her innocent doctor because someone claimed he poisoned her
I can't help thinking King John gets something of a bad deal. He certainly was a predominately bad king - but his much celebrated brother Richard the Lionheart forbade women from his coronation, incited anti-Semitic riots and spent most of his reign on expensive Crusades, barely spending any time at home. At least John stayed in England.
To coin a phrase: "Yikes!"
Why wasn't Richard III on this list?
Because tudor propaganda is responsible for his reputation. He wasn’t actually that bad
Why? :(
You missed out Richard III. He was the youngest brother and his older brother was the King, however when his brother died, Richard's nephews were next in line to the throne. These two young princes were rumored to be killed in their sleep by correct me if im wrong but stabbed. It is said that the murder of the two princes were in the hands of richard as he ordered his men to kill the young boys to make himself the next person in line to the throne
I don’t remember doing that because Edwards sons were illegitimate so why would I kill them when they were no threat to me.
Richard III never actually murdered the princes in the towers.
It was was made up by shakespeare.He wrote this so he could impress Elizabeth I by giving her grandfather(Henry VII) was a good man for overthrowing Richard III
I think it was probably Margaret Beaufort. She was fanatical about getting her son on the throne.
MOAR HORRIBLE HISTORIES CLIPS
Wow 3 tudors in one list
house of Tudor, more like house of slaughter
I thought it said cutest and showed a pic of Elizabeth 1
Lizzi was a rlly good queen tho
After seing an upload about queen Elizabeth... Im obsessed with the king and queen hsvdbsjshsvdbs
I agree with your list.
You can’t just generalise like this. King John was an excellent administrator, Elizabeth I was NOT a bloody thirsty murderer, and Æthelred the Unready was acting on the will of the people (as were most of the listed monarchs when they did ‘bad’ things).
So many IIs in this list. What’s in the number 2 and cruelty?
3 of top 5 are Henry VIII and two of his daughters.
His son, Edward VI, must feel like a failure not making the cut.
You forgot Henry the 7th.
and Richard the 3rd
Elizabeth the First does not deserve to be on here
Yes she does she supported the space trade
You think it being called the red wedding would of been a tip off(I know I’m not gonna get slack but I thought it was funny)
Glad to see Mary's not rob though. 👏👏
It's not "murder" if the Queen does it...
“I Henry II killed Thomas Becket”
I think watch mojo just get random people and say the worst stuff about them
1:56 You said 1978 lol
Shhh I time traveled
I saw on another video on TH-cam king John made someone starve to death in the dungeon
THERE IS SOMETHING SEPARATE I HAVE TO SAY INVOLVES SUBJECT OF (BRITISH MONARCHS)
Now first off, what if a small number of alternate realities the ten (British Monarchs) we know about are not horrible people; But instead the ones that exist in the alternate realities each one is a complete opposite of the ones that once existed in the true reality that we all exist in, and that includes the possibility that there might of been secretly skilled experts who knew how to handle dealing with horrible people without them selves coming close to becoming horrible people too.
do not throw dirt on mary i's name. she was shunned when she was a young child.
Well at long last
Richard the 3 how is he not on here
Why would I? I was a popular and good king?
@@richardiii7858 *ahem* princes in the tower *ahem*
What was the cause of death for James II of scotland? The lion bit him
wat really ???
I believe if queen Elizabeth 1 was cruel she had to be
Henry V seems like the only good monarch
Still don't understand why this channel is necessary, if you need to discuss British topics, do it on the main channel.
1:52 My God that is..... Akward
Ought to mention King James Stuart - his policies were the reason why the Gunpowder Plot was planned.
3:20 the trouble with Scotland is that it is full of Scotts
Ron Thornton im half scottish
wow 3 out 5 Tudors.
Æthelred II or the unready is unready of course
Elizabeth I also helped fund the African slave trade too.
1978-1013 hahahahahahaha
John was such a crappy monarch that there was an edict(not dure if it was a fulk law) passed thst no other king in England would be named John.
Bop bop bop
Bop boppa ram
Bop bop bop
Bop boppa ram
Bop bop bop
Bop boppa ram
Bop bop bop
Bop boppa ram
Boppa raaa am ammmm
Why you speak this way?
You forgot Richard III, who murdered his nephews in order to keep the throne! Also, I don't think Elizabeth I deserves to be on the list. She didn't do anything a king of the time wouldn't have done too.
Some people say that Richard III wasn’t as bad as they say because William Shakespeare wrote those things in his play Richard III to impress Elizabeth I so she thought that her grandad Henry VII was right to take the throne after the war of the roses.
No he fucking didn't why would he murder the sons of the brother he worshipped when they had already been made illegitimate, it was more than likely Henry Tudors mother Margaret Beaufort who ordered the murders of the Princes in the Tower to clear the way for her son who had no legitimate claim to the throne & most of the bad stuff attributed to King Richard III has been proved to be Tudor propaganda
No don’t believe everything. Wouldn’t it make sense that his reputation is a result of him being defeated by an opposing family. History is written by the victors
Tudor propaganda. I was innocent :(
Thanks guys.
Henry 2nd untrue
All of them,the British monarchy disgust me,I want a republic
Richard lion heart?
Some very selective statements there.
0:02 its zuck
Richard III was much more cruel than Elizabeth I and so should replace her on this list. As a minimum he had his little nephews killed so he could inherit the crown.
Tudor propaganda :(
Did Aethelread actually reign from 1987
Yes
I'll tell you most of the queens that I see pictures of or absolutely it is no wonder they were so jealous over the Irish women
why please