All the surviving people who condemned him to death were executed by Charles II. Some of the dead ones were exhumed and their heads put on spikes. Cromwell's head was on a spike for 20 years
cromwells head famously went on quite journey round the uk, from collector to collector. Believe it or not, it wasn't actually finally buried until 1960!
Him telling his son to never accept the throne is quite beautiful. His love for his family came above all else and he wouldn't have his son suffer the same fate.
no it's because he wanted his eldest son to be king. he didn't want the parliament to take advantage of his young son which would allow them to do whatever they wanted with England. also it would break the rules, his eldest son was supposed to be king that's why the young prince said he'd rather be torn to pieces first than to break the divine line of kingship.
For 2 years i worked in an office at one of the colleges at Oxford University, i was told during my time working at the college that the office i used was used by King Charles I as his office during the civil war when he used Oxford as his stronghold and the college itself as a base to rule the country from. I always felt very honoured to work in the same room as one of most famous Kings the country has ever seen all be it many centuries apart.
you use the office of a misguided individual. I find the idea of selection on the basis of DNA for inheriting a state role to be quite troublesome. Just because your DNA makes you black or a woman or otherwise different does not mean you can not hold a state role or that you are entitled to hold state roles by birth right. A democratic process of selection is INCOMPATIBLE with the idea of selection based on DNA.
As much as I detest the atrocities of history, I admire the talent of this narrator. What a precise forming of sounds, that is connected with the meaning, without tricks. Not to mention the beauty of his voice itself. Very well done.
"Detest the atrocities of history". Get over yourself. Looking at history through the lens of today is what fools do. "Detest" them all you want, but it is history that determines iur present and future.
I am fascinated with this presentation. My ancestor was Sir Francis Hacker who was Cromwell's general and signed the death sentence for King Charles I. Once the Monarchy was restored, he was tried and hanged for his part in the execution of Charles and all his wealth and holdings taken and his family tossed out into the streets. On of his sons arrived in Virginia on a prisoner ship and worked out his indenturement before his family moved on to the rough frontier of Appalachia. They settled in a remote area of what is now Hacker's Creek, West Virginia, in Upshur County.
There can be no nation under the divine right of some monarch. As a German citisen I carefully observe this nation-buildig process that in 1848 failed in my country to the detriment of whole Europe. It was then also a legal question. Your ancestor did the tagic job to switch off the tyrant. Respectfully !
one of my ancestors was the Sherif of Cornwall at the time, I don't know if he had any involvement but I would imagine he would have been on the side of the Royals as he was a protestant.
@@pecheurcrapuleux84Yes but this is now and not then. We have had the Enlightenment in between. We now doubt, quite legitimately, if there is a God let alone a Devine Right of Kings.
I've watch this many times, and it just doesn't get old. Toby Lord is a truly captivating narrator, and Jonathan Clarkson is perfectly cast as HRH King Charles 1. This is how you teach history.
nah this is how you white wash history, it doesn't go into any depth about his rule, how much of a pussy he was and how he ran the country in the ground multiple times.
The English Civil War is how one of my ancestors ended up in Virginia. He was a royalist who supported King Charles I. After the war he was imprisoned by Cromwell's forces and sold into indentured servitude on a plantation in the New World. My indentured ancestor married the boss's daughter, and acquired his own plantation on the Eastern Shore of Virginia.
There was quite a few kings who loved their wives and children. Loving your wife and children doesn’t make you a good king. But the populace, who loved THEIR wives and children, were probably afraid of being burned at the stake. 🤷♀️. And people who love their own can not give one rats about anybody else.
Holy cow. I found you somewhere between Stephen and John and I can't believe we are already at Charles I. Thank you so much for these mini-documentaries (which are pretty darn good quality, btw). I know it's not easy and your work is greatly appreciated.
Is that who this cutie is? I’ve never seen him before. Well, it’s not just his looks. He’s very good. I’m too long in the tooth to be turned by a pretty face lol. I like my docs to have substance😉.
From what I read Charles 1 only wanted to play with his kids all day. and from what he seems he wasnt really a tryant for he could have easily arrested everyone in parliament and had them all executed but he didnt. His son Charles 2 would exact revenge on all those who killed his dad and he was ruthless and made sure no one went unpunished.
Only wanted to play with his kids all day? 😂 So he was executed? 😂 Perhaps he might’ve stood before Parliament and delivered a speech entitled “On the Divine Right to Only Play with My Kids All Day” 😂
No, Charles I just entered the House of Commons and tried to arrest five members of Parliament on his own issued royal warrants for treason. The five of which had gotten advance notice of the King's coming and fled the cope. His actions are the reason why monarchs now no longer enter the House of Commons for any reason what so ever. Monarchs now send Black Rod over to summon them anytime they give the speech from the throne in the House of Peers. Black Rod has the door slammed in their face to symbolize the Commons' independence from the crown and has to knock three times using their staff to request admittance. Or Parliament holds a joint session in Westminster Hall instead. I'd suggest you watch the many prior State Opening of Parliament videos posted on here.
You know my paternal grandmother always told us we were descended from the executioner of King Charles, saying that he was forced to leave England and go live out his life in Jamaica. I really do not know how true this story was, I thought at the time this why we had so much land deep in the countryside of jamaica.
There is probably quite a bit of truth to your oral family history. Although, there might be twists and turns in the story; the basics usually stay true to the story. Maybe you could do a deeper research into it.? ?! I think you could probably find out more than you could ever dream, if you started researching different angles. You have a very interesting family history; and would make a fantastic story with whatever extra you discover!
@eitoobmiz It shows his arrogance and emphasises his inhumanity in causing the war caused his downfall - good riddance and hail the Commonwealth. The irony is most European states would've just banished their monarchs🤔
Charles the first was perhaps the most unlucky British king in the last five hundred years, a vain man who came up against a nasty cold, cruel fanatic called Cromwell, who is still hated in Ireland and should be more dispised than he is. Cromwell was a far more tyrannical man than Charles. In the end Charles's trail was a fit up and in the end Cromwell, dissolved Parliament too. When Charles the second took the throne, Cromwell's body was dug up and the corpse's head was cut off.
A small bit of information I believe now can be revealed is where the crown was safely hidden from Cromwell during this dark period. While looting the crown jewels and all the other treasures, Cromwell was so spooked when confronted with the ancient and most important holy object on earth, St Edwards Crown, he ordered the Archbishop to take and destroy it. In one of the most secret and perhaps most moving acts performed, the Archbishop with the aid of "other being", opened the tomb of King Charles and placed the crown on the now reattached head of the murdered King. Nearly all history books will dispute this claiming the crown was destroyed and melted down. Even members of the Royal Family believe the crown to be a 17th century reproduction. I can prove this is not the case. All one needs to do is read the very detailed bill presented to the Palace of Westminster from the goldsmith guild commissioned to reproduce the crown jewels. Every tiny detail and cost for every piece reproduced is listed in a manner one would expect of such a historic and important document. The most important object, the crown itself, its weight in gold, and its adorned jewels are not even mentioned. The only reference to St Edwards Crown are the four new golden support arches with the cross of Christ in dominion on the golden orb of earth created 'FOR' the St Edwards Crown. (exactly as it is today). This document is still available today for public viewing.
I would consider Charles as the more benign figure, even though he was pig-headed and extremely keen to extend his power into absolutism. Cromwell was a driven man with deep religious beliefs and he never did things half-heartedly to a degree that his name still raises passions in Ireland today. The worst failure in all this was Parliament that never lived up the ambition of some of its members even when Charles was removed from power.
Cromwell started Irish slavery. He separated Irish families and sold them into slavery. Irish were shipped to slave islands like Jamaica, Montserrat, West Indies, etc.
I find it interesting that Cromwell said he “wasn’t a king” but he did the same thing, and then tried to make his son his heir. Then it’s a heritable situation, and that’s royalty. And the Irish! Oh heavens.🥺. My mom visited Ireland in the ‘70’s, and there was LITERALLY still skulls in fields. That’s how many there was. Horrible.
First and as far as I know only time in (european) history a monarch was trialed and executed as a monarch. At the time, it was seen as a terrible crime by the rest of Europe
shame he didn't care so much about the innocent civilians he killed. the man was a horrible tyrant, it just so happens that he was replaced by a horrible tyrant so people have forgotten how bad he was.
@@bombski5657 Statements like this just show you how much people are moved by the most basic & rudimentary human behaviors, it just shows you that we're very low today, it also shows you how much many tyrannies & corruption are bypassed simply because it appeals to the sensibilities of a woman, it should show you also how many of the tyrannies we have in modern times are enabled by women & how governments today use them as frontrunners for policies.
Charles I was known to be a timid man. He was, so obviously, being taken advantage of. If he was an actual tyrant, civil war would never have happened because he would have killed all potential threats. The same way it is impossible for a civil war to break out in North Korea today. He was the total opposite of a tyrant. He was kind. And kind, got him killed.
@@kevmikhail2990 he was so timid that he tried to force a prayer book on Scotland knowing it would lead to war. A war that killed thousands of innocent people and resulted in subsequent wars. He also stubbornly refused to agree to parliaments terms which would have spared his life and stabalised the 2 kingdoms.
Such a sad ending for a King who married for love,stayed with her,had children and also loved and cared for them.This did not happen often in those days.He died with dignity,it must be so horrible to know this is your last night and you have to walk all that way to your death.At least the executioner had his weapon sharpened and it was only one quick chop.😱
That doesn’t excuse his actions, he was a lying tyrant, a papist and a terrible leader, who’s actions brought upon England 3 civil wars, a disastrous war with Spain, economic ruin, a republic and almost caused England to return to Catholicism.
Cromwell didn’t fare any better. He was vain enough to think he could be a king and the revolution he unleashed eventually consumed him. As history often shows us. Charles wasn’t on his own in his belief in the divine right if kings, this was common currency right across Europe. Look no further than Louis XIV of France, who probably took this belief to it’s most extreme conclusion.
Cromwell was successful. He ruled, he lived, and he died a natural death in office. It was his son that balls it up by being ineffectual and with no presence; that let slip his father's gains. If he had been as strong and with intelligence as his father then Britain may still have been a republic. Cromwell also ensured that if a monarchy returned it was only ever going to be a constitutional one.
Julian Coulden What do you mean he didn’t fare any better? You do know Cromwell wasn’t executed, right? Crowell did nothing wrong, bitches. He was quite a merciful man. He could have been a bloodthirsty French revolutionary, but he was a merciful man. Cromwell never wanted to be a king! And he is no fanatic like he is often portrayed. And it was parliament that banned Christmas and theatre, not fucking Cromwell!
Henry VIII: *Worst Husband/ Father towards his family* Best King of England! Charles I and VI: *beloved husband/father to his family* Worst King of Great Britain!
Henry VIII Best King? there are many other who really deserve that title, his second daughter for one, Edward III, Henry II who brought the Angevin empire into existence, William the Conqueror for sure he created the English Monarchy and i'm probably forgetting 2 or so more deserving of the title, Henry VIII was borderline psychotic for periods of his reign.
@@Devaraja67 Henry VIII was psychotic during his latter years but his former years he was quite popular. If Henry VIII only had just a son with Catherine of Aragon, he probably wouldn't have been as psychotic.
@@blugaledoh2669 I think had Mary been born a boy and survived to adulthood his political goals wouldn’t have detonated so many psychosis as his separation from Rome and the killing of Anne Boleyn produced but then who knows what other crisis might have done so? His Madness was an insidious not an overt affair, recent documents show the length he went to prepare and organize personally the execution of Boleyn.
A pivotal point in British history, perhaps even more more so in the history of America. The men whole rebelled against George the third were grandchildren of the men who left England during the fifty years following Charles' reign and they set up a government with an elected, secular sovereign or head of state. An American was executed for regicide when Charles the second came to the throne and that fact and the subsequent history remains a largely ignored area of scholarship on both sides of the Atlantic.
ttintagel Typically speaking if your grandparents were royalist then you would end up settling in the South if you were Roundheads then you would probably settle in New England .
The Governor of Connecticut was authorised to purchase and outfit two warships for use in the Revolution. The largest was named Oliver Cromwell. The Royal Navy captured her and she became HMS Restoration.
I don't know if Charles I made the right calls or not. But I do know one thing, and that is this video is freaking awesome!!! You have done a splendid job with this. Very very well done!!! Amazing 😍
I should have said paintings😬. Kriss, you’re correct, but I thought they may have gotten from their mother’s side from somewhere., I myself was incorrect. I looked on my genealogy chart, and there isn’t hardly any to speak of, the last being Catherine of Aragon, who obviously had nothing to do with the Stuart’s as far as bloodline is concerned. I guess maybe the painters wanted them to have “strong chins”, or it was the clothes! But thanks for pointing it out😉.
WOW :o That was something else! I watch a LOT of history docos but this lil 15min one was honestly like a beautiful film as well as an excellent doco, & so powerful to watch. I've never seen anything like it, but I love it!
@Stalwart Grantist if a Parliamentarian crossed HenryV111 his head got stuck on a spike outside traitors gate. I suppose he was a fine husband as well?. Total Monarchy produced men like him, he reformed the church to protestantism but received holy Communion on his death bed.
Based Eagle That’s not true. Henry VIII was a brutal tyrant, and by the end of his reign, he had completely stolen any form of power from the people, and given himself the right to do whatever he wanted, to anyone he wanted. He didn’t care a jot about the Magna Carta or citizen’s rights.
When we in our "infinite wisdom" started killing our kings and replacing them with the tyranny of the rabble, the whole world went to Hell in a handbasket. The idea that "all men are created equal" is humanistic clap trap.
Humans traditionally lived in small tribes of a few hundred under the leadership of an alpha male. I believe the problem is simply that nations should not exist united as large as they are. A royal bloodline is ridiculous, as is the weak voting for the weak to lead. Only the strongest most competent man is fit to rule.
@@iamAwesomo1994 and we have had a monarchy ever since lol. In over 1000 years we spent 15 years without a monarch. The good thing about monarchy in the UK is it works with Democracy, a very useful asset in diplomacy and on the world stage. Plus, changing the UK to a republic doesn't sound right... the United Republic (of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) Doesnt have the same ring as United Kingdom. Lol status quo is good
@@jamiemiddleditch1999 ok so I agree, in the 15 years that the uk was a republic the public hated it, the monarchy never had much power when parliament called it back though. Although the monarchy did coerce parliament into rounding up the regicides and executing them by hanging, drawing and quartering.
It was my privilege to see the movie"Cromwell"aboard a Pan Am 747 enroute to Paris. It described the trial and execution of Charles I. A sobering depiction of that episode in history.
Him dying or not didn't affect lineage. Charles II was crowned eventually, and House Stuart would continue until passing the crown to their cousins....the Hanovers....who are the great great great great great great parents of the current reigning monarch Charles III.
4:30 Whoever had the bright idea to film the narrator Toby Lord from three angles to suggest Van Dyck's 'Triple Portrait' of Charles I is to be congratulated! Brilliant.
i have recently fallen in love with the story of the causes of the english civil war. charles wasnt meant to be king and his inheritance of issues of religion , parliment and even finances from the dynasty before that along with most problems parliment had with him directly attacked those he cared about the most all mixed together into a mixing pot of issues with both him and parliment. The stuart dynasty was incredibly unlucky , and the story of him and his childrens fates , especually Elizibeths , are truly painful. he didnt deserve to die ,nor did anyone caught in the crossfire of parliment and charles .
Great video, but still unclear about the evidence presented to convict Charles, and what were the arguments between Charles and Parliament about? What were his acts of treason according to his accusers? What was Cromwell's position in Parliament?
Charles clearly had his flaws, but he went fucking hard at his execution. It's pretty admirable. Also, this is really by far the best documentary about his execution I've seen, but I do wish they'd included that moment in court where he hit a guy with his cane, the top popped off, and as nobody else would retrieve it for him, he had to bend down and get it himself. It was really, incredibly symbolic, given the circumstances.
Good steady ie not rushed presentation, also good vocal style. Hope we can look forward to similarly well-balanced analyses of Charles II, James II, the Duke of Monmouth, both Lords Protector Oliver and Richard ( especially the latter...).
Most of people who walk before their execution after the court sentences would have been terrified, scared, confused in fear, full shameful & guilt but this King walk with full confidence & proud even he's about to be executed. Means he's definitely not afraid to die.
I think it must have given him strength to know he was condemned unjustly. Charles made mistakes, certainly. But his trial was a sham, a kangaroo court. He called himself the martyr of the people, and considering Cromwell's later despotism, was Charles entirely wrong?
@@louthegiantcookieI mean, he did make sudden and often vague tax/fineable laws to feed his own coffer for ten years straight (mind you, was this much different to most Kings at the time?). Ted ed should do a History vs Video on him.
I grew up in the Kenelm Winslow house In Marshfield, Massachusetts. As near as can be determined, the house was built in 1630 and bought by Kenelm around 1632. I've often wondered what the people living there thought and said about these events - The execution of Charles -The Restoration - The Glorious Revolution - The old Pretender - Bonny Prince Charlie. I do know that many of the towns residents were Tory in outlook during the misunderstandings in the 1760-1774 time period... Even as children, my sister and I would go up to the attic and playact out all the old history. We seemed to be able to transport ourselves back to those times simply by treading on the old floorboards and touching the old beams and windows. It was a magical time and place for us Thank you for reminding me!
What an interesting comment, it made me search for a picture of the historic house. I wonder how long it would have taken for people living in Massachusetts to hear the news from England that the king had been executed.
@@R_Jackson I hope you found some pictures. The old place certainly has seen some history. We would occasionally be invited to thanksgiving dinner at Kenelm's brothers place - the Governor Edward Winslow house across town. Again, A great sense of timelessness and the ability to reach back across the mists and touch history. If my sister and I looked closely and used a bit of wishful thinking we could see an oval left by the Indian long houses in the fields. Now its all built up. I've never been back on the theory that you can't play a record backwards. I've read that a subsequent owner closed off the stairway to the slave quarters (I mean Attic) and put in a pull-down stairway. If true, I'd simply burst into tears...T he winds are generally Nor'westerly so it would take a while to round the Lizard , clear the Scilly Islands and beat across the Atlantic from London. I'd guess a two month average anyway. Those ships weren't built along America's Cup Racer lines. Now its 6 hours at Angels 35.
@@Farmer-bh3cg Yes, thank you, I did find some pictures. I'm pleased I did, but think you're quite right to avoid looking yourself, as one of the things I found said "restored" so it may be too changed for your liking. I agree with you completely that a particular sense of place almost sends us back to the past. For me it's the worn stone steps of chapels, or places like Gwydir Castle (it's an old Tudor manor really) here in Wales, that have that quality. Thanks for sharing some of the wonder of your childhood spent in those historic rooms. All the best.
The intro from 0:00 to 1:46 is just breathtaking, I love the music and beat. Was enthralled and watched through to the end. Love the production, a masterful retelling of King Charles' execution. Growing up I always allied myself with the Roundheads, I am Protestant, so believed this was right. However, Having heard all of the evils comitted by Cromwell, if I were there now, I would have taken up arms as a cavalier.
I'm reminded of Malcom's line in Macbeth about the execution of the original Thane of Cawdor for treason "But I have spoke with one that saw him die, who did report. That very frankly he confessed his treasons. Implored your Highness’ pardon, and set forth a deep repentance. Nothing in his life became him like the leaving it."
Somehow I started reading about him -was something I couldn’t understand. As a Greek I was impressed by the way this man walked towards his death. I don’t Know if King Charles The First of his Name was a good or a bad King . He faced Death as a King and as a King he died true to his believes. i respect that .
GIGI polema Yes, he was. And he was a genuinely good person. I think he was a genuinely good person, but a mediocre leader in a rapidly changing, unstable, and polarised era - and that’s what led to his demise. His last advice to his eldest son (Charles II - who eventually became king) was that if he ever became king, he must be good, kind, and just, and to not spend his life seeking revenge against those who murdered his father. For a king to be this ethical and family-oriented was extremely rare at the time. In this sense, he was ahead of his time, and I think the good, loving advice that he gave to his sons and daughters shows that he was a good person. He also told his other sons never to accept the crown before their elder brothers (and they loved and respected their father enough to listen to him). He suspected that the Parliamentarians, who had his youngest son in their custody, would attempt to make that son their puppet king. He told his sons to be brave, and that he would always love them. It’s actually really touching and heartbreaking, and I think he was quite stoic in the face of it all. He didn’t let his children see him cry, but when they left, he began weeping inconsolably. He loved his wife and never had mistresses (again, something that was extremely rare for the time - and something that was actually looked down upon by many. Having mistresses was deemed a good thing - a testament to a king’s virility). He did all this in spite of the fact that his own parents weren’t exactly happily married or as family-oriented. Unfortunately for Charles I, he was raised with an unwavering belief in his divine right to rule, and he refused to compromise on this, which led to his execution.
Great video so well put together and informative. Really captured the emotion of such a pivotal point in British history. More of these on other key turning points relating to monarchs would be fab!
Well, as an American, my ancestors on my Mothers side at least, had reached the Colony of Virginia in 1635. Thus they were spared the killings in Britain.
Well it was a necessary civil war to establish the rule of parliament and not the King. America had to have it's own civil war a couple of hundred years later at a much higher casualty toll.
A small note, 25% of the entire population of the colonies there returned to fight in the wars 1642/49. The was a skirmish the battle of the seven in Maryland. Numbers 4,14,38 to sign the death warrant of the King ended up in Hadley Massachusetts. If you like Anthony Matthews In the Name of the Crown a historical back story, In the Name of the Crown, on TH-cam tells much of these issues. I have a Facebook page and book of the same name on Amazon and Kindle.
Thank you for your Beautiful presentation. This was indeed an important part of the history of England. What a great example of how important it is to be willing to compromise.
The cameras were quite good back in 1649.
4k
Can you believe they were crank-powered too
They were partial to slo-mo.
Telescope
The old images were probably digitally enhanced.
All the surviving people who condemned him to death were executed by Charles II. Some of the dead ones were exhumed and their heads put on spikes. Cromwell's head was on a spike for 20 years
I hope this happens to the blood thirsty rinos and mad dems preforming the public execution of #45.
cromwells head famously went on quite journey round the uk, from collector to collector. Believe it or not, it wasn't actually finally buried until 1960!
Cromwell was a filthy.dog redrum redrum.most foul
cromwell was right, all kings and the Monarchy must be executed, as in the later french revolution
good
Sam Hyde did such a great job in this, how does he keep getting away with it?
I only clicked this because the thumbnail looked so much like him
@@MrKiingpin Same
Thought the same thing
I was laughing so much when I saw the thumbnail
Lmao I also thought this was Sam Hyde
Him telling his son to never accept the throne is quite beautiful. His love for his family came above all else and he wouldn't have his son suffer the same fate.
no it's because he wanted his eldest son to be king. he didn't want the parliament to take advantage of his young son which would allow them to do whatever they wanted with England. also it would break the rules, his eldest son was supposed to be king that's why the young prince said he'd rather be torn to pieces first than to break the divine line of kingship.
@@iamAwesomo1994 Corn Pop, you’re a bad dude.
@@iamAwesomo1994 exactly
@@januarysson5633 Bahaha that's a good one
@@iamAwesomo1994 And Charles ll did become King. The merry monarch! Mistresses by the score and illegitimate children too.
I'm always in a kind of awe of people who walk so proudly and calmly to their own executions.
According to Albert Pierrepoint, almost all of those he executed accepted their fate with stoicism and dignity.
That is the power of faith.
@Cole DeBeer
Most likely, yes. Good point.
Cole DeBeer well, perhaps. But historically, this is exactly what he did.🤷♀️. By people who witnessed it. Sooo...
@Cole DeBeer Few weirdos overthinking things, too.
Jonathan Clarkson, the man playing Charles in this, does such a fantastic job. His is a better portrayal of the monarch than any I've ever seen. Bravo
I liked Alec Guiness' portrayal
While Jordan clarkson playing basketball
@@kirachouinard3490 , Alec Guiness was a flaming gay.
@@georgcantor7172 And that's a problem?
@@georgcantor7172 Alec Guinness was flaming’ brilliant as King Charles. Also pretty sure, he was bisexual - not that it matters.
The guy in the thumbnail looks like Sam Hyde.
@PATRICKWIDCHIPPYS damnit you beat me to it
only reason i clicked
Cannot be unseen.
I’m glad I’m not the only one who noticed this
I came looking for this.
For 2 years i worked in an office at one of the colleges at Oxford University, i was told during my time working at the college that the office i used was used by King Charles I as his office during the civil war when he used Oxford as his stronghold and the college itself as a base to rule the country from. I always felt very honoured to work in the same room as one of most famous Kings the country has ever seen all be it many centuries apart.
Thank you for sharing that Max. It must have been quite fascinating to work in that space.
As a janitor?
Wow cool story.
@@milwaukeebrewers6337 janitors get offices now?
you use the office of a misguided individual. I find the idea of selection on the basis of DNA for inheriting a state role to be quite troublesome. Just because your DNA makes you black or a woman or otherwise different does not mean you can not hold a state role or that you are entitled to hold state roles by birth right.
A democratic process of selection is INCOMPATIBLE with the idea of selection based on DNA.
Years ago I went to drama school with the gentleman doing the narration. Toby was a great lad and its nice to see he’s still working.
As much as I detest the atrocities of history, I admire the talent of this narrator. What a precise forming of sounds, that is connected with the meaning, without tricks. Not to mention the beauty of his voice itself. Very well done.
aTrOcItIeS
@@NathanDudani The killing of a king is such a thing. The unlawful killing of a king? Even worse.
@@jamestangue7032 An sham trial throught and throught.
"Detest the atrocities of history". Get over yourself. Looking at history through the lens of today is what fools do.
"Detest" them all you want, but it is history that determines iur present and future.
Bro who talks like this?
Sam Hyde is talented af.
HE
HE CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT
Did you know he even teaches African children javascript!?
I WAS ABOUT TO POST THIS.
@@f2detaboada WAS
I am fascinated with this presentation. My ancestor was Sir Francis Hacker who was Cromwell's general and signed the death sentence for King Charles I. Once the Monarchy was restored, he was tried and hanged for his part in the execution of Charles and all his wealth and holdings taken and his family tossed out into the streets. On of his sons arrived in Virginia on a prisoner ship and worked out his indenturement before his family moved on to the rough frontier of Appalachia. They settled in a remote area of what is now Hacker's Creek, West Virginia, in Upshur County.
There can be no nation under the divine right of some monarch. As a German citisen I carefully observe this nation-buildig process that in 1848 failed in my country to the detriment of whole Europe. It was then also a legal question. Your ancestor did the tagic job to switch off the tyrant. Respectfully !
5 million germans voted hitler into power thats your nations democracy. Long live the king.
one of my ancestors was the Sherif of Cornwall at the time, I don't know if he had any involvement but I would imagine he would have been on the side of the Royals as he was a protestant.
@@pecheurcrapuleux84Yes but this is now and not then. We have had the Enlightenment in between. We now doubt, quite legitimately, if there is a God let alone a Devine Right of Kings.
@@gogogeedus But Cromwell himself was a Protestant. Some Protestants didn't like that Charles I was married to a Catholic
the way he parted with kids really struck me deep in the heart
I almost shed tears....I just imagined me hugging my daughter Andrea for the last time😢😢😢
I've watch this many times, and it just doesn't get old. Toby Lord is a truly captivating narrator, and Jonathan Clarkson is perfectly cast as HRH King Charles 1. This is how you teach history.
His Majesty
nah this is how you white wash history, it doesn't go into any depth about his rule, how much of a pussy he was and how he ran the country in the ground multiple times.
Do you know who plays Henrietta Maria?
The English Civil War is how one of my ancestors ended up in Virginia. He was a royalist who supported King Charles I. After the war he was imprisoned by Cromwell's forces and sold into indentured servitude on a plantation in the New World. My indentured ancestor married the boss's daughter, and acquired his own plantation on the Eastern Shore of Virginia.
Your ancestor had the rizz
@@falconeshieldso sigma
with how many slaves?
@@pt9046 lots. Get over it.
Finally England had a king that loved he’s wife and children and what did they do? They killed him!!!!
No a right winged assole killed him, the people put him back
@@DemonCuz :D:D:D man are you dumb dumb dumb
There was quite a few kings who loved their wives and children. Loving your wife and children doesn’t make you a good king. But the populace, who loved THEIR wives and children, were probably afraid of being burned at the stake. 🤷♀️. And people who love their own can not give one rats about anybody else.
vachief dumbass
Regena asdf he was killed for conspiring against parliament. Pretty straightforward.
Beautifully narrated and filmed. Must admit that Charles I is one the kings I didn’t know much about, so thank you for this little film.
Holy cow. I found you somewhere between Stephen and John and I can't believe we are already at Charles I. Thank you so much for these mini-documentaries (which are pretty darn good quality, btw). I know it's not easy and your work is greatly appreciated.
You're welcome
This is outstanding. Outstanding work by HRP AND PP and of course Toby.
Agreed! Toby's great in this. Someone sign him up.
Is that who this cutie is? I’ve never seen him before. Well, it’s not just his looks. He’s very good. I’m too long in the tooth to be turned by a pretty face lol. I like my docs to have substance😉.
ha pp
This is so well made - from the editing, to the acting, to the music - just perfect
From what I read Charles 1 only wanted to play with his kids all day. and from what he seems he wasnt really a tryant for he could have easily arrested everyone in parliament and had them all executed but he didnt.
His son Charles 2 would exact revenge on all those who killed his dad and he was ruthless and made sure no one went unpunished.
Only wanted to play with his kids all day? 😂 So he was executed? 😂 Perhaps he might’ve stood before Parliament and delivered a speech entitled “On the Divine Right to Only Play with My Kids All Day” 😂
oh damn, how many people did charles 2 son have killed?
No, Charles I just entered the House of Commons and tried to arrest five members of Parliament on his own issued royal warrants for treason. The five of which had gotten advance notice of the King's coming and fled the cope. His actions are the reason why monarchs now no longer enter the House of Commons for any reason what so ever. Monarchs now send Black Rod over to summon them anytime they give the speech from the throne in the House of Peers. Black Rod has the door slammed in their face to symbolize the Commons' independence from the crown and has to knock three times using their staff to request admittance. Or Parliament holds a joint session in Westminster Hall instead. I'd suggest you watch the many prior State Opening of Parliament videos posted on here.
@@robbiestewart89 thanks, appreciate it
All monarchs is fundamentally a tyrant.
A tremendous video, expertly narrated, this is the TH-cam content we all need.
You know my paternal grandmother always told us we were descended from the executioner of King Charles, saying that he was forced to leave England and go live out his life in Jamaica. I really do not know how true this story was, I thought at the time this why we had so much land deep in the countryside of jamaica.
There is probably quite a bit of truth to your oral family history. Although, there might be twists and turns in the story; the basics usually stay true to the story. Maybe you could do a deeper research into it.? ?! I think you could probably find out more than you could ever dream, if you started researching different angles. You have a very interesting family history; and would make a fantastic story with whatever extra you discover!
Kill an English King, get Jamaican land and family.
@@andrawusazimi8428 More like exile to Jamaica.
@@ToastieBRRRN -With benefits
Yeahh mon
Kind of badass that he fixed his hair and told the executioner when it was okay to swing the axe
He truly loved his kids.....may not have been a great king but damn he was a awesome family man!.....respect 🔥
Why is tour name Paul but you have a picture of a woman? Who is this woman?
@@lukealadeen7836 my wife
@@bronzemen34 I don't believe you. Whats her name? Is she a singer?
@@lukealadeen7836 than don’t believe me.............I dont just put any random pic of a woman? And yeh she sings!!!
@@bronzemen34 Can you recommend a song of hers?
The last part when he place his head on block was so heartbreaking. His eyes says it all. I dont know who he is but his acting is brilliant.❤
Allan Cumming
@@Frottussle Thanks 😊
It’s actually a friend of mine called Johnathan Clarkson..... he’s amazing!!
@@Frottussle Jonathan Clarkson, not Alan Cumming
@@ashleighpatti1360 lucky
This is so incredibly well done. The videography, the music, the narration. Superb. Earned a new subscriber.
An amazing video. It really captured the humanity of Charles; nothing I've ever read even tried to do that.
S Muir lefty
@S Muir If you can't be objective about history, then don't concern yourself with it.
@eitoobmiz It shows his arrogance and emphasises his inhumanity in causing the war caused his downfall - good riddance and hail the Commonwealth. The irony is most European states would've just banished their monarchs🤔
@eitoobmiz At that time I mean, Louis' period was nearly 100 years later and yes he got the same as Charles I
He wasn't human🦎
Charles the first was perhaps the most unlucky British king in the last five hundred years, a vain man who came up against a nasty cold, cruel fanatic called Cromwell, who is still hated in Ireland and should be more dispised than he is. Cromwell was a far more tyrannical man than Charles. In the end Charles's trail was a fit up and in the end Cromwell, dissolved Parliament too. When Charles the second took the throne, Cromwell's body was dug up and the corpse's head was cut off.
A small bit of information I believe now can be revealed is where the crown was safely hidden from Cromwell during this dark period. While looting the crown jewels and all the other treasures, Cromwell was so spooked when confronted with the ancient and most important holy object on earth, St Edwards Crown, he ordered the Archbishop to take and destroy it. In one of the most secret and perhaps most moving acts performed, the Archbishop with the aid of "other being", opened the tomb of King Charles and placed the crown on the now reattached head of the murdered King. Nearly all history books will dispute this claiming the crown was destroyed and melted down. Even members of the Royal Family believe the crown to be a 17th century reproduction. I can prove this is not the case. All one needs to do is read the very detailed bill presented to the Palace of Westminster from the goldsmith guild commissioned to reproduce the crown jewels. Every tiny detail and cost for every piece reproduced is listed in a manner one would expect of such a historic and important document. The most important object, the crown itself, its weight in gold, and its adorned jewels are not even mentioned. The only reference to St Edwards Crown are the four new golden support arches with the cross of Christ in dominion on the golden orb of earth created 'FOR' the St Edwards Crown. (exactly as it is today). This document is still available today for public viewing.
I would consider Charles as the more benign figure, even though he was pig-headed and extremely keen to extend his power into absolutism. Cromwell was a driven man with deep religious beliefs and he never did things half-heartedly to a degree that his name still raises passions in Ireland today. The worst failure in all this was Parliament that never lived up the ambition of some of its members even when Charles was removed from power.
Cromwell started Irish slavery. He separated Irish families and sold them into slavery. Irish were shipped to slave islands like Jamaica, Montserrat, West Indies, etc.
I find it interesting that Cromwell said he “wasn’t a king” but he did the same thing, and then tried to make his son his heir. Then it’s a heritable situation, and that’s royalty. And the Irish! Oh heavens.🥺. My mom visited Ireland in the ‘70’s, and there was LITERALLY still skulls in fields. That’s how many there was. Horrible.
@@DemonCuz i love that, thank you
It's crazy to think that they really did arrest a king,put him on trial,then executed him.
I wish they would do that now,
The French also did that. It's one of the two only appropriate place for a monarch, besides the abolition of that institution itself.
@@tonymirabal8832 with what king?
First and as far as I know only time in (european) history a monarch was trialed and executed as a monarch. At the time, it was seen as a terrible crime by the rest of Europe
And the narrator himself looks like Charles
so i'm not the only one who thinks that.
Haha. I thought maybe it was him at first.
What if he's actually Charles and assumes that we won't notice it?
It's lovely that he cared so much for his wife and children.
shame he didn't care so much about the innocent civilians he killed. the man was a horrible tyrant, it just so happens that he was replaced by a horrible tyrant so people have forgotten how bad he was.
@@bombski5657 Statements like this just show you how much people are moved by the most basic & rudimentary human behaviors, it just shows you that we're very low today, it also shows you how much many tyrannies & corruption are bypassed simply because it appeals to the sensibilities of a woman, it should show you also how many of the tyrannies we have in modern times are enabled by women & how governments today use them as frontrunners for policies.
Charles I was known to be a timid man. He was, so obviously, being taken advantage of. If he was an actual tyrant, civil war would never have happened because he would have killed all potential threats. The same way it is impossible for a civil war to break out in North Korea today.
He was the total opposite of a tyrant. He was kind. And kind, got him killed.
@@kevmikhail2990 he was so timid that he tried to force a prayer book on Scotland knowing it would lead to war. A war that killed thousands of innocent people and resulted in subsequent wars. He also stubbornly refused to agree to parliaments terms which would have spared his life and stabalised the 2 kingdoms.
@@bombski5657 he refused because the parliament was unlawful. There was no precedent for trying the king. The king was the law.
"He then writes a letter to Charles his eldest advising him on what to do when he becomes king.." 😭😭
Such a sad ending for a King who married for love,stayed with her,had children and also loved and cared for them.This did not happen often in those days.He died with dignity,it must be so horrible to know this is your last night and you have to walk all that way to your death.At least the executioner had his weapon sharpened and it was only one quick chop.😱
Nicolas and Alexandra of Russa also married for love and loved their children immensely
That doesn’t excuse his actions, he was a lying tyrant, a papist and a terrible leader, who’s actions brought upon England 3 civil wars, a disastrous war with Spain, economic ruin, a republic and almost caused England to return to Catholicism.
@@BaneofBots They could have exiled him instead, they did it with the last Kaiser.
@@antman5474 he would’ve just come straight back, this was the 17th century, not the 20th.
@@BaneofBots Either way he was still murdered unlawfully.
Cromwell didn’t fare any better. He was vain enough to think he could be a king and the revolution he unleashed eventually consumed him. As history often shows us. Charles wasn’t on his own in his belief in the divine right if kings, this was common currency right across Europe. Look no further than Louis XIV of France, who probably took this belief to it’s most extreme conclusion.
Yes, but Cromwell was beheaded posthumously.
Cromwell was successful. He ruled, he lived, and he died a natural death in office. It was his son that balls it up by being ineffectual and with no presence; that let slip his father's gains. If he had been as strong and with intelligence as his father then Britain may still have been a republic. Cromwell also ensured that if a monarchy returned it was only ever going to be a constitutional one.
Julian Coulden
What do you mean he didn’t fare any better? You do know Cromwell wasn’t executed, right?
Crowell did nothing wrong, bitches. He was quite a merciful man. He could have been a bloodthirsty French revolutionary, but he was a merciful man. Cromwell never wanted to be a king! And he is no fanatic like he is often portrayed. And it was parliament that banned Christmas and theatre, not fucking Cromwell!
Joella Z gosh why are you so angry? We aren’t discussing the meaning of life here?
Julian Coulden
Cause Cromwell is life. Cromwell is love.
This was such a well put together video! Thank you so much!
Henry VIII: *Worst Husband/ Father towards his family* Best King of England!
Charles I and VI: *beloved husband/father to his family* Worst King of Great Britain!
They were England´s yin and yang.☯
Henry VIII Best King? there are many other who really deserve that title, his second daughter for one, Edward III, Henry II who brought the Angevin empire into existence, William the Conqueror for sure he created the English Monarchy and i'm probably forgetting 2 or so more deserving of the title, Henry VIII was borderline psychotic for periods of his reign.
@@Devaraja67 Henry VIII was psychotic during his latter years but his former years he was quite popular. If Henry VIII only had just a son with Catherine of Aragon, he probably wouldn't have been as psychotic.
Elizabeth I: greatest ever monarch.
@@blugaledoh2669 I think had Mary been born a boy and survived to adulthood his political goals wouldn’t have detonated so many psychosis as his separation from Rome and the killing of Anne Boleyn produced but then who knows what other crisis might have done so?
His Madness was an insidious not an overt affair, recent documents show the length he went to prepare and organize personally the execution of Boleyn.
I could listen to Toby all day. What a lovely voice.
Thank you making it easy to digest with great narration and phots/videos.
Charles's actor is just splendid.
Sam Hyde
A pivotal point in British history, perhaps even more more so in the history of America. The men whole rebelled against George the third were grandchildren of the men who left England during the fifty years following Charles' reign and they set up a government with an elected, secular sovereign or head of state. An American was executed for regicide when Charles the second came to the throne and that fact and the subsequent history remains a largely ignored area of scholarship on both sides of the Atlantic.
My first American ancestor was the son of a Royalist imprisoned by Cromwell.
ttintagel Typically speaking if your grandparents were royalist then you would end up settling in the South if you were Roundheads then you would probably settle in New England .
The Governor of Connecticut was authorised to purchase and outfit two warships for use in the Revolution.
The largest was named Oliver Cromwell. The Royal Navy captured her and she became HMS Restoration.
Washington's ancestors were royalists. His greatgreatgreat grandfather rector Lawrence Washington was a close ally to Charles I.
@@chrisgibson5267 So...perfect.
I don't know if Charles I made the right calls or not. But I do know one thing, and that is this video is freaking awesome!!! You have done a splendid job with this. Very very well done!!! Amazing 😍
I’ve never seen that painting of James and Charles. I didn’t realize how much of the Hapsburg chin they had!
Which painting is that?
I should have said paintings😬. Kriss, you’re correct, but I thought they may have gotten from their mother’s side from somewhere., I myself was incorrect. I looked on my genealogy chart, and there isn’t hardly any to speak of, the last being Catherine of Aragon, who obviously had nothing to do with the Stuart’s as far as bloodline is concerned. I guess maybe the painters wanted them to have “strong chins”, or it was the clothes! But thanks for pointing it out😉.
@@mangot589 I think thats just his pointy beard
WOW :o
That was something else! I watch a LOT of history docos but this lil 15min one was honestly like a beautiful film as well as an excellent doco, & so powerful to watch. I've never seen anything like it, but I love it!
I was recommended this by TH-cam, a few days after the appointment of King Charles III.
What are you trying to tell me, Benevolent Algorithm?
He survived post March, so Charles III isn't the shortest monarch in British reign.
I’ve been searching hard trying to find out who composed/performed the beautiful music, and no credit is given. Frustrating! Does anyone know?
Hi Meredith. Music is by - www.willstapleton.com
@@mattoliver3502 Thank you!! Just saw this..,
@@Ichthus61 why did you end your reply with a comma instead of a full stop?
@@manusharma3601 typo
Manu Sharma Are you trying to be annoying? It’s obviously a typo.
Well, Sam kind of deserved to die, what with all the people he's killed over the years.
Nathan he couldn’t keep getting away with it forever...
What is the source of the music? Is it available somewhere?
i clicked in this video because i legitimately thought it was Sam Hyde playing another one of his 'artistic plays'
Well actually by getting decapitated, he's taking his pranks to the next level.
Poor old Charles! Would'nt have happened to Henry Vlll.
Parliament had far fewer powers under Henry’s regime than they did by the time Charles’ reign rolled about.
@Stalwart Grantist if a Parliamentarian crossed HenryV111 his head got stuck on a spike outside traitors gate. I suppose he was a fine husband as well?. Total Monarchy produced men like him, he reformed the church to protestantism but received holy Communion on his death bed.
Oddly I think Henry the 8th was strangely liked by the people .
Yes, boss! Dis depicts weakness on Charles' side. Henry VIII would rather have all d parliamentarians' heads.
Based Eagle That’s not true. Henry VIII was a brutal tyrant, and by the end of his reign, he had completely stolen any form of power from the people, and given himself the right to do whatever he wanted, to anyone he wanted. He didn’t care a jot about the Magna Carta or citizen’s rights.
When we in our "infinite wisdom" started killing our kings and replacing them with the tyranny of the rabble, the whole world went to Hell in a handbasket.
The idea that "all men are created equal" is humanistic clap trap.
Humans traditionally lived in small tribes of a few hundred under the leadership of an alpha male. I believe the problem is simply that nations should not exist united as large as they are. A royal bloodline is ridiculous, as is the weak voting for the weak to lead. Only the strongest most competent man is fit to rule.
This is sad, he's a brave man, he handled it with courage.
they ended up asking his son to come be king years later anyway when they realized they wanted the monarchy.
Yeah King Charles's story is very tragic I even teared up a little bit up
@@iamAwesomo1994 and we have had a monarchy ever since lol. In over 1000 years we spent 15 years without a monarch. The good thing about monarchy in the UK is it works with Democracy, a very useful asset in diplomacy and on the world stage. Plus, changing the UK to a republic doesn't sound right... the United Republic (of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) Doesnt have the same ring as United Kingdom. Lol status quo is good
@@jamiemiddleditch1999 ok so I agree, in the 15 years that the uk was a republic the public hated it, the monarchy never had much power when parliament called it back though. Although the monarchy did coerce parliament into rounding up the regicides and executing them by hanging, drawing and quartering.
sAd
Holy moly, didn't know Sam Hyde used to be a king
He's the King of the Jews, the messiah
I watch this now for the first time. Superbly done. Master story teller...
It was my privilege to see the movie"Cromwell"aboard a Pan Am 747 enroute to Paris. It described the trial and execution of Charles I. A sobering depiction of that episode in history.
Its very odd to believe that if he wasn't king or even killed, it would have altered the family lineage and Queen Elizabeth wouldn't exist or reign.
No his second oldest son took over
Him dying or not didn't affect lineage. Charles II was crowned eventually, and House Stuart would continue until passing the crown to their cousins....the Hanovers....who are the great great great great great great parents of the current reigning monarch Charles III.
Can somebody please tell me the name of the tune that plays in the start? I think it is very cool.
4:30 Whoever had the bright idea to film the narrator Toby Lord from three angles to suggest Van Dyck's 'Triple Portrait' of Charles I is to be congratulated! Brilliant.
i have recently fallen in love with the story of the causes of the english civil war. charles wasnt meant to be king and his inheritance of issues of religion , parliment and even finances from the dynasty before that along with most problems parliment had with him directly attacked those he cared about the most all mixed together into a mixing pot of issues with both him and parliment. The stuart dynasty was incredibly unlucky , and the story of him and his childrens fates , especually Elizibeths , are truly painful. he didnt deserve to die ,nor did anyone caught in the crossfire of parliment and charles .
Great video, but still unclear about the evidence presented to convict Charles, and what were the arguments between Charles and Parliament about? What were his acts of treason according to his accusers? What was Cromwell's position in Parliament?
Background music???
Anyone please
I'd love to know the name of the background music
Beautifully executed video...can anyone pls tell me the name of the background music?! Thanks in advance!!
Superb production and telling of this historic event, much enjoyed!
"Think it, dream it, do it"
- Charles I
Charles clearly had his flaws, but he went fucking hard at his execution. It's pretty admirable.
Also, this is really by far the best documentary about his execution I've seen, but I do wish they'd included that moment in court where he hit a guy with his cane, the top popped off, and as nobody else would retrieve it for him, he had to bend down and get it himself. It was really, incredibly symbolic, given the circumstances.
Good steady ie not rushed presentation, also good vocal style. Hope we can look forward to similarly well-balanced analyses of Charles II, James II, the Duke of Monmouth, both Lords Protector Oliver and Richard ( especially the latter...).
Fantastic video. Enjoyed watching and learning :) Would love to see more of these.
They killed him because he taught African children Javascript. What a tragedy.
Racist people..
Parlement after capturing King Charles: “We’re just gonna kill’ ‘em”
Lmao he cant keep getting away with this
Most of people who walk before their execution after the court sentences would have been terrified, scared, confused in fear, full shameful & guilt but this King walk with full confidence & proud even he's about to be executed. Means he's definitely not afraid to die.
I think it must have given him strength to know he was condemned unjustly. Charles made mistakes, certainly. But his trial was a sham, a kangaroo court. He called himself the martyr of the people, and considering Cromwell's later despotism, was Charles entirely wrong?
@@louthegiantcookieI mean, he did make sudden and often vague tax/fineable laws to feed his own coffer for ten years straight (mind you, was this much different to most Kings at the time?). Ted ed should do a History vs Video on him.
I grew up in the Kenelm Winslow house In Marshfield, Massachusetts. As near as can be determined, the house was built in 1630 and bought by Kenelm around 1632. I've often wondered what the people living there thought and said about these events - The execution of Charles -The Restoration - The Glorious Revolution - The old Pretender - Bonny Prince Charlie. I do know that many of the towns residents were Tory in outlook during the misunderstandings in the 1760-1774 time period...
Even as children, my sister and I would go up to the attic and playact out all the old history. We seemed to be able to transport ourselves back to those times simply by treading on the old floorboards and touching the old beams and windows.
It was a magical time and place for us Thank you for reminding me!
What an interesting comment, it made me search for a picture of the historic house. I wonder how long it would have taken for people living in Massachusetts to hear the news from England that the king had been executed.
@@R_Jackson I hope you found some pictures. The old place certainly has seen some history. We would occasionally be invited to thanksgiving dinner at Kenelm's brothers place - the Governor Edward Winslow house across town. Again, A great sense of timelessness and the ability to reach back across the mists and touch history. If my sister and I looked closely and used a bit of wishful thinking we could see an oval left by the Indian long houses in the fields. Now its all built up. I've never been back on the theory that you can't play a record backwards. I've read that a subsequent owner closed off the stairway to the slave quarters (I mean Attic) and put in a pull-down stairway. If true, I'd simply burst into tears...T
he winds are generally Nor'westerly so it would take a while to round the Lizard , clear the Scilly Islands and beat across the Atlantic from London. I'd guess a two month average anyway. Those ships weren't built along America's Cup Racer lines. Now its 6 hours at Angels 35.
@@Farmer-bh3cg Yes, thank you, I did find some pictures. I'm pleased I did, but think you're quite right to avoid looking yourself, as one of the things I found said "restored" so it may be too changed for your liking. I agree with you completely that a particular sense of place almost sends us back to the past. For me it's the worn stone steps of chapels, or places like Gwydir Castle (it's an old Tudor manor really) here in Wales, that have that quality. Thanks for sharing some of the wonder of your childhood spent in those historic rooms. All the best.
The fall of kings is followed by misery.
The intro from 0:00 to 1:46 is just breathtaking, I love the music and beat. Was enthralled and watched through to the end. Love the production, a masterful retelling of King Charles' execution. Growing up I always allied myself with the Roundheads, I am Protestant, so believed this was right. However, Having heard all of the evils comitted by Cromwell, if I were there now, I would have taken up arms as a cavalier.
Traitor 🇬🇧
Yea it was wonderful
Yes,absolutely
this has to be the best history video ever
What was the music used? It sounds amazing
T'was I. Thank you!
I'm reminded of Malcom's line in Macbeth about the execution of the original Thane of Cawdor for treason "But I have spoke
with one that saw him die, who did report. That very frankly he confessed his treasons. Implored your Highness’ pardon, and set forth a deep repentance. Nothing in his life became him like the leaving it."
His crimes were not made explicit in this video.
Bravo! Dope storytelling my guy!
One thing, the son didn't heed his fathers words and was crowned king 10 years later when he was old enough.
Somehow I started reading about him -was something I couldn’t understand. As a Greek I was impressed by the way this man walked towards his death.
I don’t Know if King Charles The First of his Name was a good or a bad King . He faced Death as a King and as a King he died true to his believes.
i respect that .
I’ve always thought that Charles was a good person but a flawed king.
Just Another Happy Humanist , was the second son a sickly boy ,probably with no expectations to became a King one day .
GIGI polema Yes, he was. And he was a genuinely good person.
I think he was a genuinely good person, but a mediocre leader in a rapidly changing, unstable, and polarised era - and that’s what led to his demise.
His last advice to his eldest son (Charles II - who eventually became king) was that if he ever became king, he must be good, kind, and just, and to not spend his life seeking revenge against those who murdered his father.
For a king to be this ethical and family-oriented was extremely rare at the time. In this sense, he was ahead of his time, and I think the good, loving advice that he gave to his sons and daughters shows that he was a good person. He also told his other sons never to accept the crown before their elder brothers (and they loved and respected their father enough to listen to him). He suspected that the Parliamentarians, who had his youngest son in their custody, would attempt to make that son their puppet king. He told his sons to be brave, and that he would always love them. It’s actually really touching and heartbreaking, and I think he was quite stoic in the face of it all. He didn’t let his children see him cry, but when they left, he began weeping inconsolably.
He loved his wife and never had mistresses (again, something that was extremely rare for the time - and something that was actually looked down upon by many. Having mistresses was deemed a good thing - a testament to a king’s virility).
He did all this in spite of the fact that his own parents weren’t exactly happily married or as family-oriented.
Unfortunately for Charles I, he was raised with an unwavering belief in his divine right to rule, and he refused to compromise on this, which led to his execution.
Just Another Happy Humanist I think that his biggest mistake was that he wasn't a wolf among wolfs.
Such brilliantly captivating storytelling with a simple yet powerful soundtrack and great camerawork and framing.
Whatever was done to him was very much against justice and fairness. It wasn't a fair trial and therefore a murder.
Great video so well put together and informative. Really captured the emotion of such a pivotal point in British history. More of these on other key turning points relating to monarchs would be fab!
Omg this is so well produced and the music was incredible
Forget what show it was, but after the execution, Cromwell looked at the King's body and remarked, "Brutal necessity."
Narration was incredible.
Best of all
Hello, could you point us to the title of that beautiful music please ? thank you
The music is straight up SEXY. NUMEROUS people have asked about it. GIVE US THE MUSIC!!!!
I love this whole presentation! Very stylish.
Where did you guys got that sound track from, for this video? Who's melody is this?
Well, as an American, my ancestors on my Mothers side at least, had reached the Colony of Virginia in 1635. Thus they were spared the killings in Britain.
Well it was a necessary civil war to establish the rule of parliament and not the King. America had to have it's own civil war a couple of hundred years later at a much higher casualty toll.
@@chrisjung7197 the parliament full of religious corruption
Mine fled Scotland in the 1670's winding up on the eastern side of the North Carolina mountains. Where from that point never bowed again to any crown.
A small note, 25% of the entire population of the colonies there returned to fight in the wars 1642/49. The was a skirmish the battle of the seven in Maryland. Numbers 4,14,38 to sign the death warrant of the King ended up in Hadley Massachusetts. If you like Anthony Matthews In the Name of the Crown a historical back story, In the Name of the Crown, on TH-cam tells much of these issues. I have a Facebook page and book of the same name on Amazon and Kindle.
@@anthonymatthews7193 Interesting thank you for the information.
Loving these 15 minute historical videos! This one and the Princes in the tower. Please do more👍
Thank you for your Beautiful presentation. This was indeed an important part of the history of England.
What a great example of how important it is to be willing to compromise.
Wonderfully put together video...bravo!!
A king should never compromise, a king only answers to God and no one else...
Not everyone believes in Sky Daddy.
@@JesseWright68 Not everyone believes in absolutist monarchy. I'm on team constitutional republic, courtesy of the US.
@@tylerchambers6246 that held up for about 20 minutes. Then we got what de Tocqueville predicted.
Is this really free to watch on TH-cam? I haven't seen anything of this professional quality on here for a long while.
Finally brought to justice, Samuel Hyde could not keep getting away with it.
So this is where my 5 dollars a month is going to Sam Hyde...... MDE never dies.
He kept it pretty hush
These are the kinds of YT videos that cheer me up at night! 😃
And here I thought the thumbnail was Charles Hyde. He can't getting away with it!