I can't tell you how much I like that your videos are well organized and concise. I see a lot of other Star Citizen youtubers who upload like 40m-1 hour long videos talking about updates/new stuff when a 15min video would do.
I appreciate the kind words, I spend a lot of time trying to distill down things a bit while still giving room for some related footage! I hope I can bring that level of quality to Citizencon.
wait till you find out how morpho reported and cried to cig to ban a clever player for using his brain and using game mechanics, at least cig unbanned the player after they saw how this particular no brain content creator cries
@@XxXnonameAsDXxX no but it’s a domino effect. Faster servers equals better AI, organic mission/non-mission gameplay etc. I’d be happier to spawn in my hangar and that would be a piece of piss to implement. All that stuff is easy in the grand scheme of things, building a mini-universe with server meshing was the hard part and it’s almost done.
@@Morphologis My faith in CIG didn't fail at the endless broken promises, it was when they were incapable of even porting over "complete" features from S404 to the PU in a reasonable time frame. IMO, its an incredibly low bar and they failed miserably.
Citizencon is a great study in human psychology; After multiple years of presenting fancy cinematics and jpegs at these events (remember the Sandworm?) and then selling lots of ships, people eventually feel let down after a few months, and then another Citcon comes around and the process repeats like clockwork.
It doesn't really matter what they say will be in the release version. They've become exceptionally good at saying things and then forgetting them or changing their mind. Anything they say today will be completely meaningless by release.
@@GunShocka Hahaha, I love how dudes on the internet just have to find a way to be right! "You didn't specifically disagree with part of my statement! Therefore you are wrong and I am victorious!" I definitely used to follow it closely. These days I follow it more closely than some, but it's limited to the occasional update video from morphologis or noobifier. I'm keen to see what squadron 42 ends up being like. I've totally lost faith in the multiplayer component these days.
They dropped info about 4.0 in like 2016 or '17 as coming soon too, Morph. They'll drop 1.0 info and then when it comes out 4+ years from now it'll look nothing like they presented this year. You've been around long enough to know better, homie.
@@mattvmalone My step dad used to say we were going to this place soon or getting a thing soon and it took way longer than he said. I stopped trusting his words too because his actions didn't match up. 5 years ago in December Chris said we were getting Pyro. Chris is full of it.
Still waiting on AI crew mates and full multicrew experience (substations, swapping out damaged components etc) before jumping back in regardless of what version the game is.
all of that is starting with 4.0 if you paid attention to literally anything.. at all.. literally anything that has been the focus the last 4-6 months and you can already swap components etc.. multi crew already exists just not at the higher level for captial ships which is why the first one minus the 890 is the polaris which is going to be testing the upgraded multi crew features etc. Following that AI crew isn't coming anytime soon and may not even be a thing anymore or will be fairly minimal at best, it's not been even brought up much because it's not an important aspect to work on. The AI team has been working on sq42 and SC AI and its just AI for the current gameplay. I find it unlikely they would have scratched working on AI to be hired by players and function. The game requires a lot more backend work and the first major step in that is 4.0 which again is the first iteration and testing on server meshing as a possibility since there's a select few games that even have or are trying server meshing most not even able to achieve any form of success and the few who have aren't able to achieve the scaling SC is attempting. As such you're entire hope to play again when AI is a thing for players is unlikely to even be in 1.0 because that's not a main focus. The main focus will be core loops and a basic economy with minimal issues.
@@yulfine1688 and if you paid attention to all the last years of development with CIG, is that they always over promise and underdeliver. The multicrew changes were getting now should have come out with atleast yet another T0 implementation that doesnt get worked on for the next years. Too many people will be unable to use their big ships they bought because of component failures and not having anyone to fix them while flying. If we had atleast NPC crew, we could have them fix them and most of us would be good, but we wont see them for multiple years probably. And before you say this is an mmo and you should be forced to make friends to play with, people have to realise that multicrew is only fun when its done right (barotrauma is a great example). Also, not to say that most of the people have lives and things to do, so even if you have friends to play this game, its very possible that they dont have the time to play at the same time you do. Even then, doing anything in this game takes multiple minutes or hours to do anything meaningful.
@@CocainasBrokeBrain That is why Orgs exist - you want to play combat in a big ship... get help. Otherwise play in what you can sustain like everyone else. People solo'ing in cap ships has always been rejected by CIG... to be clear... THEY DO NOT WANT PEOPLE TO SOLO BIG SHIPS Hope that was clear
@@agonyaunt6325 Let me know if you have any tips for places to go. So far I'm thinking of hitting Hawksmoor for a nice steak, and the Science and Industry Museum looks promising.
I really hope people temper their hype this year. CIG trades on it, and their perisistent failures to deliver are enabled in large part by this event. We have to remember that it's all just a show until it's available to play on the live server.
With 4.0 on evocati now, there isn’t much to temper, that was the big promise last year and it looks like we’re getting it just in time. I’m sure it’s gonna be a buggy hellscape but I don’t really care.
@@jchoo3387 I think the fact that you don't really care that it's going to be a mess, on top of the fact that 4.0 was "upcoming" roughly six years ago, tells me that you're already prepared to blindly ride the hype train. Up to you, I guess.
@@disky01 no the reason I don’t care is because we are quite literally helping to test for these bugs. It is not the final game. and expecting such is going to lead the disappointment. The advancements they’ve had in the past year. I genuinely enough to keep me in my group of 12 friends highly satisfied now the fact that we’re gonna get jump points by the end of the year is a bonus. But keep being mad and riding the hate train you do you.
@@jchoo3387 I've had these conversations too many times. I'm not going to provide the litany of delays and failures to prove my reasons for disliking what CIG has done to the game. If you're having fun, I'm happy for you, but the fact is that CIG has consistently failed to deliver a game and in year 12, we have a catastrophically buggy mess of an alpha with extremely limited content and not nearly enough progress. We have lots of very pretty, expensive ships, many of which do not actually exist, and a "microtransaction" business model, the growth of which outshines the game itself. I don't know how long you've been following the game, but from someone who's been around since the beginning, I hope you haven't put too much money down.
I wouldnt be surprised he literally tried, I kid you not, to gaslight his youtube audience with post modern gender affirming rhetoric. Just because he got his little star cult shill platform he felt like it was also his duty to brainwash kids into being disassociated/alienated to their own genitals or whatever... This dude is cursed
There's wayyyyy too many things they need to get done (not even counting star systems) before we can consider a 1.0 Anything else is a half-released product.
@@evocorporation6537 Yeah, there is definitely a lot... But the parts that are required for 1.0, I don't think it's TOO hard to imagine happening over the next few years. Probably TL;DR but I'll try to explain. 4.0 finally made it into evocati with jump gates active... I think when that makes it into Live and we are standing in Pyro, it will be much easier to squint far off into the distance and see 1.0. I mean I'm not blind, I understand why people think it _is_ hard to imagine. Especially based on the pace we've seen things being released so far. But so much of the time so far has been spent on back end/structural stuff. StarEngine, Rastar, planet tech, object container streaming, persistent entity streaming, etc etc etc. _Things that are much harder to predict than gameplay mechanics and content._ Server meshing is the last big one, happening as we speak. After that, the next biggest challenge is probably the thing they are calling StarSim. From the sounds of it, the Turbulent people are almost 100% focused on cranking out star systems. When all they have to focus on is the content, I could see star systems coming relatively quick. Stanton and Pyro will be some of the biggest, most content-heavy systems. There will be a lot of smaller ones like Nyx, and they could probably make a couple of those per year. 5 systems is basically the minimum requirement for 1.0. Aside from that, all signs point to a SQ42 release announcement at CitCon, and that will mean even more manpower coming over to the PU. A lot of people seem to think they all switched over already.... but I'm pretty sure most of them haven't yet. Anyway those are just my thoughts, not trying to convince anybody. Don't even particularly care how right or wrong it ends up being tbh
We will be looking back at the 1.0 citcon reveal and laughing , just like we do older citcons today. All i care about is they prove they can make an actual game . Get sq42 out the door and prove cig is a studio that can actually make a successful game . That would do wonders for people having faith in the SC mmo
for a 1.0 id say 5-6 years but it is likely they don't have that kind of time it might be something that by 2027 or 2028 they have to have a 1.0 type product out we don't know all the ins and outs.
on one hand you are right, but on the other hand if everything that is in the game right now and what is planned for the relatively near future would work 100% and the game would be highly polished and optimized, i honestly think it would go a damn long way. And they can then still add to the game, but just as in adding to an already existing polished product and not as a test center.
The game will continue to get content added even after a live release, just like Minecraft. What matters is that there ACTUALLY IS a minimal viable product so they can start focusing on only bug fixing and polishing.
Buddy what you're asking for isn't even a viable option even if magically all tools were working perfectly with little issue the scope and size isn't a viable option it would take assuming everything was perfect probably another decade to hit that scale That is highly unrealistic. ITS an mmo anyways its live service they'll have to start with a minimum and add onto it like every mmo has to, often holding off on numerous things as major updates
What are you even talking about??? The point of a 1.0 is to deliver the "promised content." What do you think was "promised" that would not be delivered in a 1.0 release? Keep in mind, if we only go by what is "promised," that would not include planetary landing or fully explorable planets. The stretch goals "promised" 100 star systems at release, but those star systems would have been NOTHING compared to the ones we are getting now. So the reality is we are getting far MORE than what was "promised," and that's why it is taking so long.
My biggest visual issue is that we have sooo many pretty ships but we don't have any locations to back them up (by that I mean, apart from major cities and natural structures, everything from stations to outposts feel like the same few assists used over and over and over again, creating an experience where regardless of activities or game loops given, ground locations will always just feel the same.) Hopefully for Pyro we can see more variation in stations and ground locations as to not repeat the Star field ground location experience🤞
The biggest issue with this game is not even CIG.. its the BAckers.. Cant take any criticism.. their reply to everything is " its Alpha!!" g3t over it!!
Its probably because they dropped too much money on this video game so they have to blindly cope instead of admitting making a bad decision in life. I want this game to succeed as much as the next person because there is truly nothing like it. But if they cease production for whatever reason. That would be so hilarious.
tbh, im tired of asking about "what are the upcoming feature" or "HOW insert gameplay feature". the only question is WHEN, every year we have this CON thingy and its all the same thing over and over.
I'm confident to say 1.0 will NOT be "the vision of SC until now". That vision has got to include all the ships and associated gameplay they have already sold, and we all know that ain't happening, especially when they couldn't even port over "complete" features from S42 in any kind of reasonable time. Can also see them stopping at Pyro because its good enough as a proof of concept that the systems work and then adding in more star systems is simply a matter of 'expanding content' *eye roll*, which I bet is good enough for them to not bother for 1.0, so will we even see a return of Levski for 1.0 let alone Earth... I'm mashing X to doubt.
porting over complete features from a single player game to a multiplayer mmo isn't as simple as just moving it over.. not even close and most of what they showed off last year that they said was coming is already in... they said they would start porting over sq42 things that includes a lot of the combat updates which was most of this year combat updates, the new flight model a ton of balancing, a lot of the other work was backend updates and QOL stuff with the UI which 3.24 has most of that and .2 has the UI updates etc, the new map is in as well and doing much better than even the first launch of it within a few months. All the ships and associated gameplay that is entirely false. 1.0 doesn't require everything to be in that's not even close to what 1.0 is even about. 1.0 is having core gameplay loops and an economy actually in, it doesn't mean every ship is in, it doesn't mean every faction is in like the banu, like the vanduul.
I would say they probably wont stop at Pyro because I think most of the star systems if I remember right are pretty barren and can probably easily be spit out with the procedural generation/handcrafted tools they have talked about before. We are talking CIG here hard to believe anything they say so who knows.
I never thought it would happen, but I have reached the point where I am more excited about Sq42 than the player universe. They just don't really seem to have a clear vision, making everything up as they go along, which is extremely high risk for the quality and cohesion of what we'll end up with.
@@B.D.E. I think he means J3PT, or as he's sometimes known ChatJ3PT. He's all over Spectrum defending every decision made by CIG. He has never once been critical of them. He gets away with insulting anyone critical of the game but someone fires back at him and they get hit by the mods. Amazingly enough he actually did get hit by a short ban a few weeks ago. I guess he reached the point where the mods couldn't cover for him any longer. Still, the previous poster isn't entirely wrong about what J3PT said. SQ42 is meant to be a 3 parter (although never a console game). So when people say "When SQ42 is finished they can move everyone over to SC" they are not right, because CIG at least owes early backers part 2 "Behind Enemy Lines" (early working title) as some of them got part 2 as part of their pledge. Expect another 10+ years before that is delivered, then part 3... so 2042 isn't actually unrealistic based on CIG's speed.
@@B.D.E. you might not be so excited about SQ42 if you've seen the script. Its hard to find these days. It was posted to scribd and then removed. Might be able to find it via internet archive or something. Its hilariously bad. Imagine Wing Commander the Movie all over again.
Ha maybe SQ 42 in a few years. 1.0 is still very far away. I remember in 2018 they made it seem like pyro was coming out soon and that's just releasing now.
you do realize they were in polishing last year... its been 1.5 years that is within standard for triple A games ot polish to adding another year makes a lot of sense to get a release date by q4 2025 Saying its 4 more years away when everything is in the game there's no major changes to the game makes zero sense.
@@yulfine1688 SQ 42 has been "possibly coming out next year" since 2013. We won't see the release in 2025, maybe broader testing at best. Marketing will want a minimum of a full year and cig will delay it on top of that as usual. The pu 1.0 release is not even remotely close.
@@danielmcarthur9004 Why would marketing want a year... that is a terrible way to drive up interest. You want a sharp injection of hype shortly before launch.
Hey morph been watching for a while now and been really enjoying looking back and seeing how much more there has been to talk about as CIG has gotten better when it comes to designing ships. Looking forward to architect reviews for the Polaris and looking forward to many more ships to watch you break down
@@TitusFlavius11How's that? You can play the game right now, it has always made constant progress, S42 is feature complete and in the polishing phase, and server meshing (advanced tech that no other game has and will push the entire gaming industry forward) is currently being SUCCESSFULLY tested. No scam is this transparent, where backers have been able to see every step of development in real-time, with constant updates, community engagement, and playable versions throughout the process.
Until we have Full Pyro, 4.0, SQ42 & Server meshing in hand, I won’t be spending anything on this project, No Citcon tickets, Ships, Subs ect. I’m already €4.5k into this project across multiple accounts.
@@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n was this for someone else ? I’m not worried about a console release, chances are I’ll be playing on console more casually when it does drop. I’ve spent too much time and money waiting for CIG to actually meet their own deadlines for release. My expectations are on the floor in the basement this year.
So basically you just need SQ42 at this point, which most believe will be revealed this weekend... possibly with a launch date. Sounds like you are getting what you want.
1.0 is when they finish all the CoreTech and have them working, and have about 2 - 4 star system on launch. That is what I gathered from them over the last couple years, so will see if I am right when they discuss it.
Pleased to hear you'll be doing some interviews. Felt a bit weird last year that none of the english speaking creators really put any of that type of content out. Hope everyone going has a blast.
Personally i believe the data mining they pay for says that a lot of backers were angry going into this years citizen con. Thuley are trying to calm the storms now. Mfd leaks, 4.0 etc. We as investors need to stay true and value our money and time. Chris should answer for some things and people need to remember pyro was talked ans shown in 2017
Yup people in this comment section acting like 4.0 came on time this year. haha Its pretty funny to see both blind tribalism factions at war on the internet... There is more PVP in this comment section than the game itself. XD
Granted, we're still waiting on a release of 4.0 and Server Meshing tech... but if it takes 3-4 years post 4.0 to get to 1.0, I think that's a major failure on CIG's part. Once the foundational tech is fully stabilized, like Data Structures and Net Code; and even the secondary elements like tooling for content generation (missions, locations, characters, etc.), things should go much faster. The only way they should be taking more than 2 years to get to 1.0 is if they still have 90% of their workforce focused on SQ42. So pray that we get a release date for that game at CitizenCon, and that it's within the next 6 months.
SQ42 needs to come out sooner or later, and it needs to be good. DAMN good. CIG needs to prove they can release a polished game which can live up to the hype they've built. They need to prove that the tech that they've developed can actually work (which, in a single player environment, it ought to). NONE of my friends have any faith in the project and wrote it off years ago. Personally I'm skeptical I'll even want to play it with all the tedious sim-like mechanics. SQ42 will, I hope, present a slice of what SC will play like. And I sincerely hope I like it. Genuinely, I want to have my faith restored and believe that they're produce the amazing experience I backed for years ago. But, well, you know. Nothing another "disgruntled player" or "salty vet" hasn't said already.
3-4 years out is insane. $700 mill you can afford to employ as many devs as needed. 1 year tops and then people are making their own star citizen with ai.
That is $700m over the last 12 years. As an average that is 60m per year. They have 1,200 people at the company If they all have an average salary of 50k that equals..... 60m You also have the costs of the office buildings they have acquired the mocap studio, the patents, the licences for all the computers, branded clothes etc. Concord cost 400m for a very average, linear game.
Is there anyone who still really believe in the CIG promise-marketing? Its all about "Saying big things, make the dreams huge and people will pay us for this even if we proved it we just lie."
Sadly cant afford to make it to citizencon all the way from deepest rural Devon in southwest UK. The piracy capital of the UK! Would love to meet you, would be my main reason to attend ...i play the game so rarely now, but still have my ship and follow the "game's" (lack of) meaningful "progress" mainly via your uploads. I'm at the point where i feel more like I'm following an ambitious tech project, than am an active player/citizen making my way in a huge open universe. Strangely Elite gave me just this feeling probably 40 years ago, but achieving this feeling seems to be less important than the material chosen to finish the edging on the upholstery on a bar stool at a mining outpost in Star Citizen. Im still impressed by the game (it's not really a game though), i still love your style. If you fancy a hike on Dartmoor ( it's peak shroom season right now) or a trip to some secret beaches, hmu 🎉. Its a beautiful part of the UK.
Enjoy CitizenCon (never has that suffix felt more accurate) and hopefully your questions will be given some genuine consideration, I think they know that you're someone it would be a very bad idea to just fob off with the same old nonsense.......and have a safe journey.
CIG is making two of the first ever AAAA games. One is feature complete and the other just successfully tested server meshing which is no other game has at such an advanced level. It makes sense that the backend required to make the two most ambitious games ever will take a long time to complete before the "gaming" aspect can be properly worked on.
@@ErikLiberty (*AAAAA) I used to say similar shit to people back in 2017 when I bought my first , admittedly beautiful, ship. I now realise, in my case at least, it was me being defensive. "game" still LOOKS beautiful 😍
@@ErikLiberty yeah got to admit I feel proper stupid now..... expecting the developers of a GAME to have started working on the "GAMING" aspect of the game after just 15 years and well over half a billion spent on it.
We still havent even gotten everything from last years citizencon. Dont have 4.0 or even full server meshing yet. How are we gna believe them for a release date for anything? CIG in the last 9 years ive been a backer has yet to release anything on time
I'm more interested in what 1.0 means in terms of stability and playability. CIG is used to shipping garbage code because "its alpha". will that change or is 1.0 nothing more than alpha 4.1
Well, a 10% drop in Tesla stock price immediately after the Robotaxi announcement (and the general public reaction) isn’t a good sign many people share your excitement on at least that one but I guess we will see.
That said, not a bad pairing since Musk and SC do have a similar approach to selling expensive features with hype many years before they develop them like the original “vision” Full Self Driving, 2018 Mars launches and the many large ships and gameplay loops not yet in concept while continuing to pre sell new concepts. Don’t get me wrong, Tesla/SpaceX do some cool things, have made real tech advancements and same for SC but they all wildly over promise and under deliver years late. Starship and SC’s just now going into 4.0 testing actually seem like an especially great comparison. Both are showing some solid fundamentals that are needed for what they have said they would do and sold stock based on (or expensive ships everyone knows will be years from now and are realistically largely investing in the game’s dev). But those fundamentals, yes done in impressive/harder new ways needed for the eventual goals they talk about that I really do hope they reach, don’t prove any new actual deliverable capabilities beyond what others in their industry have been proving for actual decades (like access LEO or have many players able to play together). Yes they are both done with a lot more complicated additions to support the end goal like catching the rocket/supporting all the granular ways SC wants to model spacecraft function but are a very long way from showing they can deliver a functional/consistent product with the new abilities they were sold on like access beyond Earth orbit or the large, immersive space game with the expensive large ships and stable/interconnected gameplay types/loops.
Just so you know, Star citizen 1.0 came out a couple years ago because of a lawsuit with a refund that they stated in their lawsuit against the guy asking for a refund that it was a full finished game that is now in a live testing. So it's already 1.0 we're already in 3.0 that's why the next thing is called 4.0
um no.. not even close.. where did you even pull that from.. Whatever random mess of things you decided to look at is far from the truth, you don't even understand the lawsuit either apparently. Its why incomptent morons who aren;t lawyers shouldn't talk about something they don't even understand
Its gonna happen but its not what everyone is going to expecting that why Morph and other content creators say its literally going to be a minimal viable product... People are clouded in their minds thinking what pie in the sky 1.0 is going to look like and will set over the top expectations without looking or thinking about their current and previous track record of them developing this game...
@@ratedxvn everyone should already know 1.0bwill be at best 5 systems with base professions etc. think what people really want to hear is their plans post 1.0 and how they’ll develop it, e.g will they push 1-2 systems out each 3-6 months with x amount of ships etc and develop upon professions
At this point I'm genuinely so apathetic towards SQ42, I just want that game to be done and out the door so it finally stops impeding SC's progress and we can get an acceptable pace of development going.
My favorite thing they do is constantly fail at almost everything then tell everyone they are dropping the next stage. It’s a dumpster fire how can you be releasing the game soon lol.
I posted on the forum that Jupiter has 95 UNDISCOVERED moons and that this is great for 'discovery'. Nightrider deleted it ofc. PR is a bitch, and kind Ben left.... The project died years ago...
I disagree about 1.0 being so far out. I think it will be an MVP (Minimal Viable Product) containing all the core features/game loops. However on the content side, that would take years as CIG builds out more and more star systems.
When SC finally releases the people who spent 5-figures on the game and already have an entire fleet will have nothing to work towards. Why do that to yourself?
I really only care about squadron at this point. I am supporting and following star citizen but i wont play it until they have a better user experience(controller support, gameplay loop for people who dont want to deal with trolls, etc). I hope squadron comes out soon, because starfield did not scratch that itch for anyone
mostly waiting for SQ42. Lost interest in SC since it's still nowhere ready to be playable with all the main components half working or fully absent...
Unpopular opinion, but I'm going to be hyped and stay hyped no matter what they present. I'm one of the apparently-few people who are pretty happy with the recent progress :) (And I've been waiting since 2014)
I find it funny that SC 1.0 has been "3-4 years away" for like 12 years.
I can't tell you how much I like that your videos are well organized and concise. I see a lot of other Star Citizen youtubers who upload like 40m-1 hour long videos talking about updates/new stuff when a 15min video would do.
I appreciate the kind words, I spend a lot of time trying to distill down things a bit while still giving room for some related footage! I hope I can bring that level of quality to Citizencon.
wait till you find out how morpho reported and cried to cig to ban a clever player for using his brain and using game mechanics, at least cig unbanned the player after they saw how this particular no brain content creator cries
Damn morphologis … can you do an architect reviews on your drip?
+1 that sh*t is crisp
Fr
Hoooof
some shitty glasses and a white shirt?
@@sigmamale6128 damn, I wasn’t trying to make anyone jealous
Bold move predicting release in 3 or 4 years.
1.0 will have a much more limited scope than the full vision of Star Citizen.
The artists said their systems are queuing up ready to go. Server meshing is the golden ticket
@@illgottengains1314server meshing ain't gonna solve the major design failures that systems designed for a small player count cause currently.
@@XxXnonameAsDXxX no but it’s a domino effect. Faster servers equals better AI, organic mission/non-mission gameplay etc. I’d be happier to spawn in my hangar and that would be a piece of piss to implement. All that stuff is easy in the grand scheme of things, building a mini-universe with server meshing was the hard part and it’s almost done.
@@Morphologis My faith in CIG didn't fail at the endless broken promises, it was when they were incapable of even porting over "complete" features from S404 to the PU in a reasonable time frame.
IMO, its an incredibly low bar and they failed miserably.
Citizencon is a great study in human psychology;
After multiple years of presenting fancy cinematics and jpegs at these events (remember the Sandworm?) and then selling lots of ships, people eventually feel let down after a few months, and then another Citcon comes around and the process repeats like clockwork.
Afaik they never said the sandworm was coming soon
CIG is proving hype is something you can sell repeatedly
"Remember the Sandworm" - your point is so valid you had to dig out an example from 8 years ago.
@@QuotidianStupidity hey how is pyro 2018 release going on?
@@pigozzlooking pretty good gotta say
It doesn't really matter what they say will be in the release version. They've become exceptionally good at saying things and then forgetting them or changing their mind.
Anything they say today will be completely meaningless by release.
And yet youll watch citizencon and follow the project closely all the same
@@TheWasd1234 I personally won't watch citizencon. I'll probably watch some of noobifier's summary videos after the fact.
@@funkyschnitzel
Thats still technically following the project closely
@@GunShocka Hahaha, I love how dudes on the internet just have to find a way to be right!
"You didn't specifically disagree with part of my statement! Therefore you are wrong and I am victorious!"
I definitely used to follow it closely. These days I follow it more closely than some, but it's limited to the occasional update video from morphologis or noobifier.
I'm keen to see what squadron 42 ends up being like. I've totally lost faith in the multiplayer component these days.
They've gotten most of the stuff done that they talked about getting done within a year at the last CitCon. CIG has gotten better.
They dropped info about 4.0 in like 2016 or '17 as coming soon too, Morph.
They'll drop 1.0 info and then when it comes out 4+ years from now it'll look nothing like they presented this year. You've been around long enough to know better, homie.
Shit happens. :)
@@mattvmalone My step dad used to say we were going to this place soon or getting a thing soon and it took way longer than he said. I stopped trusting his words too because his actions didn't match up.
5 years ago in December Chris said we were getting Pyro. Chris is full of it.
@@DaringDan 5 years and you numpties still have no clue what you're talking about.
@@mattvmaloneno fuck that, not when you're selling me a product
Spacex landed their largest rocket on a pair of floating sticks today.
Yeah honestly it's way cooler than this video
Elon integrated a dual VKB stick set to land the booster.
@@Sparkk0 huh
@@Woobieeee Oceangate used a Logitech controller. So Elon thought it was better to use VKBs. A little more expensive.
And for less money than what Chris raised for this “game”
Still waiting on AI crew mates and full multicrew experience (substations, swapping out damaged components etc) before jumping back in regardless of what version the game is.
all of that is starting with 4.0 if you paid attention to literally anything.. at all.. literally anything that has been the focus the last 4-6 months and you can already swap components etc..
multi crew already exists just not at the higher level for captial ships which is why the first one minus the 890 is the polaris which is going to be testing the upgraded multi crew features etc.
Following that AI crew isn't coming anytime soon and may not even be a thing anymore or will be fairly minimal at best, it's not been even brought up much because it's not an important aspect to work on. The AI team has been working on sq42 and SC AI and its just AI for the current gameplay.
I find it unlikely they would have scratched working on AI to be hired by players and function.
The game requires a lot more backend work and the first major step in that is 4.0 which again is the first iteration and testing on server meshing as a possibility since there's a select few games that even have or are trying server meshing most not even able to achieve any form of success and the few who have aren't able to achieve the scaling SC is attempting.
As such you're entire hope to play again when AI is a thing for players is unlikely to even be in 1.0 because that's not a main focus.
The main focus will be core loops and a basic economy with minimal issues.
@@yulfine1688 and if you paid attention to all the last years of development with CIG, is that they always over promise and underdeliver. The multicrew changes were getting now should have come out with atleast yet another T0 implementation that doesnt get worked on for the next years.
Too many people will be unable to use their big ships they bought because of component failures and not having anyone to fix them while flying.
If we had atleast NPC crew, we could have them fix them and most of us would be good, but we wont see them for multiple years probably. And before you say this is an mmo and you should be forced to make friends to play with, people have to realise that multicrew is only fun when its done right (barotrauma is a great example). Also, not to say that most of the people have lives and things to do, so even if you have friends to play this game, its very possible that they dont have the time to play at the same time you do. Even then, doing anything in this game takes multiple minutes or hours to do anything meaningful.
im waiting to be able to play without wipes and trash performance
@@CocainasBrokeBrain That is why Orgs exist - you want to play combat in a big ship... get help. Otherwise play in what you can sustain like everyone else.
People solo'ing in cap ships has always been rejected by CIG... to be clear... THEY DO NOT WANT PEOPLE TO SOLO BIG SHIPS
Hope that was clear
See you at CitizenCon! I'm heading to Manchester a day early to take in the city before the convention.
Oh dear... Manchester isn't exactly a great city to visit. Still, there is a chance it won't be pouring with rain. A slim one, but its possible.
@@agonyaunt6325 Let me know if you have any tips for places to go. So far I'm thinking of hitting Hawksmoor for a nice steak, and the Science and Industry Museum looks promising.
I really hope people temper their hype this year. CIG trades on it, and their perisistent failures to deliver are enabled in large part by this event. We have to remember that it's all just a show until it's available to play on the live server.
With 4.0 on evocati now, there isn’t much to temper, that was the big promise last year and it looks like we’re getting it just in time. I’m sure it’s gonna be a buggy hellscape but I don’t really care.
@@jchoo3387 I think the fact that you don't really care that it's going to be a mess, on top of the fact that 4.0 was "upcoming" roughly six years ago, tells me that you're already prepared to blindly ride the hype train. Up to you, I guess.
@@disky01 no the reason I don’t care is because we are quite literally helping to test for these bugs. It is not the final game. and expecting such is going to lead the disappointment. The advancements they’ve had in the past year. I genuinely enough to keep me in my group of 12 friends highly satisfied now the fact that we’re gonna get jump points by the end of the year is a bonus. But keep being mad and riding the hate train you do you.
@@jchoo3387 I've had these conversations too many times. I'm not going to provide the litany of delays and failures to prove my reasons for disliking what CIG has done to the game. If you're having fun, I'm happy for you, but the fact is that CIG has consistently failed to deliver a game and in year 12, we have a catastrophically buggy mess of an alpha with extremely limited content and not nearly enough progress. We have lots of very pretty, expensive ships, many of which do not actually exist, and a "microtransaction" business model, the growth of which outshines the game itself.
I don't know how long you've been following the game, but from someone who's been around since the beginning, I hope you haven't put too much money down.
@@jchoo3387 I hope you have a confortable chair for the waiting. SC is a game to sell ships and make Chris and Sandy more yatchs.
You're going to need to dress up much warmer for Manchester! Safe travels
Haha the lighting makes it look as if Morph did put on some lipstick lol
Haha I was wondering same. Maybe it's the cold?
I wouldnt be surprised he literally tried, I kid you not, to gaslight his youtube audience with post modern gender affirming rhetoric. Just because he got his little star cult shill platform he felt like it was also his duty to brainwash kids into being disassociated/alienated to their own genitals or whatever... This dude is cursed
My expectations are low
Thanks for sharing?
@@ExplodingCow49cope
There's wayyyyy too many things they need to get done (not even counting star systems) before we can consider a 1.0
Anything else is a half-released product.
Clearly youre a fudster roadmap hating bigot
How many star systems do you think are required for "1.0?"
@@neofromthewarnerbrothersic145 its not the star systems but the gameplay mechanics and ship (reworks) that matter. There's just so bloody many.
@@evocorporation6537 Yeah, there is definitely a lot... But the parts that are required for 1.0, I don't think it's TOO hard to imagine happening over the next few years. Probably TL;DR but I'll try to explain.
4.0 finally made it into evocati with jump gates active... I think when that makes it into Live and we are standing in Pyro, it will be much easier to squint far off into the distance and see 1.0.
I mean I'm not blind, I understand why people think it _is_ hard to imagine. Especially based on the pace we've seen things being released so far. But so much of the time so far has been spent on back end/structural stuff. StarEngine, Rastar, planet tech, object container streaming, persistent entity streaming, etc etc etc. _Things that are much harder to predict than gameplay mechanics and content._ Server meshing is the last big one, happening as we speak. After that, the next biggest challenge is probably the thing they are calling StarSim.
From the sounds of it, the Turbulent people are almost 100% focused on cranking out star systems. When all they have to focus on is the content, I could see star systems coming relatively quick. Stanton and Pyro will be some of the biggest, most content-heavy systems. There will be a lot of smaller ones like Nyx, and they could probably make a couple of those per year. 5 systems is basically the minimum requirement for 1.0.
Aside from that, all signs point to a SQ42 release announcement at CitCon, and that will mean even more manpower coming over to the PU. A lot of people seem to think they all switched over already.... but I'm pretty sure most of them haven't yet.
Anyway those are just my thoughts, not trying to convince anybody. Don't even particularly care how right or wrong it ends up being tbh
We will be looking back at the 1.0 citcon reveal and laughing , just like we do older citcons today.
All i care about is they prove they can make an actual game . Get sq42 out the door and prove cig is a studio that can actually make a successful game .
That would do wonders for people having faith in the SC mmo
Excited for the upcoming videos! Safe travels and enjoy the con.
Maybe in 3 or 4 years? That soon? You are very optimistic in your timeline.
for a 1.0 id say 5-6 years but it is likely they don't have that kind of time it might be something that by 2027 or 2028 they have to have a 1.0 type product out we don't know all the ins and outs.
I don't want a minimal viable product. I want what they promised to finish. I worry 1.0 is an excuse to say there done with no consequences.
on one hand you are right, but on the other hand if everything that is in the game right now and what is planned for the relatively near future would work 100% and the game would be highly polished and optimized, i honestly think it would go a damn long way. And they can then still add to the game, but just as in adding to an already existing polished product and not as a test center.
@@th3orist Which is exactly what they should be doing because the game is and has always been an obvious Live Service.
@@th3orist I agree with both of you and just wanna say thanks for saying this. It pleases me that common sense is still present within the community.
The game will continue to get content added even after a live release, just like Minecraft. What matters is that there ACTUALLY IS a minimal viable product so they can start focusing on only bug fixing and polishing.
Buddy what you're asking for isn't even a viable option even if magically all tools were working perfectly with little issue the scope and size isn't a viable option it would take assuming everything was perfect probably another decade to hit that scale
That is highly unrealistic.
ITS an mmo anyways its live service they'll have to start with a minimum and add onto it like every mmo has to, often holding off on numerous things as major updates
Whats the point of a 1.0 anyways if more than half the promised content still hasn't been delivered as it had been promised?
What are you even talking about??? The point of a 1.0 is to deliver the "promised content."
What do you think was "promised" that would not be delivered in a 1.0 release?
Keep in mind, if we only go by what is "promised," that would not include planetary landing or fully explorable planets. The stretch goals "promised" 100 star systems at release, but those star systems would have been NOTHING compared to the ones we are getting now. So the reality is we are getting far MORE than what was "promised," and that's why it is taking so long.
My biggest visual issue is that we have sooo many pretty ships but we don't have any locations to back them up
(by that I mean, apart from major cities and natural structures, everything from stations to outposts feel like the same few assists used over and over and over again, creating an experience where regardless of activities or game loops given, ground locations will always just feel the same.)
Hopefully for Pyro we can see more variation in stations and ground locations as to not repeat the Star field ground location experience🤞
The biggest issue with this game is not even CIG.. its the BAckers.. Cant take any criticism.. their reply to everything is " its Alpha!!" g3t over it!!
Its probably because they dropped too much money on this video game so they have to blindly cope instead of admitting making a bad decision in life. I want this game to succeed as much as the next person because there is truly nothing like it. But if they cease production for whatever reason. That would be so hilarious.
If the criticism was something easily waved away by the fact that the game is in fact an Alpha then they are correct.
Safe trip Morph
Oh cant wait for some nice new informations. You always have such a nice way of presenting them
tbh, im tired of asking about "what are the upcoming feature" or "HOW insert gameplay feature". the only question is WHEN, every year we have this CON thingy and its all the same thing over and over.
They got done most of what they talked about getting done this year at CitCon
They literally said when last year... you just aren't paying attention
I'm confident to say 1.0 will NOT be "the vision of SC until now".
That vision has got to include all the ships and associated gameplay they have already sold, and we all know that ain't happening, especially when they couldn't even port over "complete" features from S42 in any kind of reasonable time.
Can also see them stopping at Pyro because its good enough as a proof of concept that the systems work and then adding in more star systems is simply a matter of 'expanding content' *eye roll*, which I bet is good enough for them to not bother for 1.0, so will we even see a return of Levski for 1.0 let alone Earth... I'm mashing X to doubt.
porting over complete features from a single player game to a multiplayer mmo isn't as simple as just moving it over.. not even close and most of what they showed off last year that they said was coming is already in... they said they would start porting over sq42 things that includes a lot of the combat updates which was most of this year combat updates, the new flight model a ton of balancing, a lot of the other work was backend updates and QOL stuff with the UI which 3.24 has most of that and .2 has the UI updates etc, the new map is in as well and doing much better than even the first launch of it within a few months.
All the ships and associated gameplay that is entirely false. 1.0 doesn't require everything to be in that's not even close to what 1.0 is even about.
1.0 is having core gameplay loops and an economy actually in, it doesn't mean every ship is in, it doesn't mean every faction is in like the banu, like the vanduul.
I would say they probably wont stop at Pyro because I think most of the star systems if I remember right are pretty barren and can probably easily be spit out with the procedural generation/handcrafted tools they have talked about before. We are talking CIG here hard to believe anything they say so who knows.
Have the BALLS to ask the difficult questions, the hard questions!
Like what?
@@QuotidianStupidityWHAT HAVE YOU BEEN BURNING OUR MONEY ON??
@@BB-848-VAC 1200x people on an average annual salary of 50k = 60m
That is where the money goes
I'm just waiting for Squadron 42 now
JEPT says on Spectrum that sq42 was always meant to be a 3 part console port. My guess is 2042
@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n Who?
I never thought it would happen, but I have reached the point where I am more excited about Sq42 than the player universe. They just don't really seem to have a clear vision, making everything up as they go along, which is extremely high risk for the quality and cohesion of what we'll end up with.
@@B.D.E. I think he means J3PT, or as he's sometimes known ChatJ3PT. He's all over Spectrum defending every decision made by CIG. He has never once been critical of them. He gets away with insulting anyone critical of the game but someone fires back at him and they get hit by the mods. Amazingly enough he actually did get hit by a short ban a few weeks ago. I guess he reached the point where the mods couldn't cover for him any longer. Still, the previous poster isn't entirely wrong about what J3PT said. SQ42 is meant to be a 3 parter (although never a console game). So when people say "When SQ42 is finished they can move everyone over to SC" they are not right, because CIG at least owes early backers part 2 "Behind Enemy Lines" (early working title) as some of them got part 2 as part of their pledge. Expect another 10+ years before that is delivered, then part 3... so 2042 isn't actually unrealistic based on CIG's speed.
@@B.D.E. you might not be so excited about SQ42 if you've seen the script. Its hard to find these days. It was posted to scribd and then removed. Might be able to find it via internet archive or something. Its hilariously bad. Imagine Wing Commander the Movie all over again.
Ha maybe SQ 42 in a few years. 1.0 is still very far away. I remember in 2018 they made it seem like pyro was coming out soon and that's just releasing now.
you do realize they were in polishing last year... its been 1.5 years that is within standard for triple A games ot polish to adding another year makes a lot of sense to get a release date by q4 2025
Saying its 4 more years away when everything is in the game there's no major changes to the game makes zero sense.
@@yulfine1688 SQ 42 has been "possibly coming out next year" since 2013. We won't see the release in 2025, maybe broader testing at best. Marketing will want a minimum of a full year and cig will delay it on top of that as usual. The pu 1.0 release is not even remotely close.
@@danielmcarthur9004 Why would marketing want a year... that is a terrible way to drive up interest. You want a sharp injection of hype shortly before launch.
@@QuotidianStupidity to line it up with citizencon. One year to announce it and the following year it will be the "release" one but they will delay it
Looking forward to the coverage Morph!!
Looking forward to this years citcon. My first I'll attend in person overdue since backing in 2017. Hope you have a good trip over :)
Hey morph been watching for a while now and been really enjoying looking back and seeing how much more there has been to talk about as CIG has gotten better when it comes to designing ships. Looking forward to architect reviews for the Polaris and looking forward to many more ships to watch you break down
Ill be there as well - first CitizenCon ever, despite pledging back in 2012. Should be a great experience
Me also!
Excited to get even more scammed?
Have fun! Wish I could be there!
Same for me as well.
@@TitusFlavius11How's that? You can play the game right now, it has always made constant progress, S42 is feature complete and in the polishing phase, and server meshing (advanced tech that no other game has and will push the entire gaming industry forward) is currently being SUCCESSFULLY tested. No scam is this transparent, where backers have been able to see every step of development in real-time, with constant updates, community engagement, and playable versions throughout the process.
Until we have Full Pyro, 4.0, SQ42 & Server meshing in hand, I won’t be spending anything on this project, No Citcon tickets, Ships, Subs ect.
I’m already €4.5k into this project across multiple accounts.
They cant release sq42 to consoles yet because its so advanced for current tech. Give it a decade or two for them to catchup you hater
@@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n was this for someone else ?
I’m not worried about a console release, chances are I’ll be playing on console more casually when it does drop.
I’ve spent too much time and money waiting for CIG to actually meet their own deadlines for release. My expectations are on the floor in the basement this year.
4.0 and Pyro and server meshing have been in players hands right now being successfully tested.
So basically you just need SQ42 at this point, which most believe will be revealed this weekend... possibly with a launch date.
Sounds like you are getting what you want.
@@QuotidianStupidity 🤞
Excited to meet up with you again Morph
what do you thing will happen first starcitizen releasing or a person landing on mars ? :)
www.hornoxe.com/wp-content/picdumps/picdump462/picdump462_059.jpg
Prepare to be hyped and then disappointed but still lets hope
1.0 is when they finish all the CoreTech and have them working, and have about 2 - 4 star system on launch. That is what I gathered from them over the last couple years, so will see if I am right when they discuss it.
Looking forward to seeing your perspective
Squadron 42: I Held the Line.... more like Hold the Line
Pleased to hear you'll be doing some interviews.
Felt a bit weird last year that none of the english speaking creators really put any of that type of content out.
Hope everyone going has a blast.
Personally i believe the data mining they pay for says that a lot of backers were angry going into this years citizen con. Thuley are trying to calm the storms now. Mfd leaks, 4.0 etc. We as investors need to stay true and value our money and time. Chris should answer for some things and people need to remember pyro was talked ans shown in 2017
Yup people in this comment section acting like 4.0 came on time this year. haha Its pretty funny to see both blind tribalism factions at war on the internet... There is more PVP in this comment section than the game itself. XD
Chris with this and elon dropping his robots. What a good time to be
While Children dying in PKistan and Lebanon. Interesting
@@Badd.G People die everywhere... such is life
Looking forward to your coverage bro
Granted, we're still waiting on a release of 4.0 and Server Meshing tech... but if it takes 3-4 years post 4.0 to get to 1.0, I think that's a major failure on CIG's part. Once the foundational tech is fully stabilized, like Data Structures and Net Code; and even the secondary elements like tooling for content generation (missions, locations, characters, etc.), things should go much faster. The only way they should be taking more than 2 years to get to 1.0 is if they still have 90% of their workforce focused on SQ42. So pray that we get a release date for that game at CitizenCon, and that it's within the next 6 months.
Hype! Buy buy buy!!! Don't miss out!
Volunteer in the lobby here hope to meet you due to your old SE adventures !
SQ42 needs to come out sooner or later, and it needs to be good. DAMN good.
CIG needs to prove they can release a polished game which can live up to the hype they've built. They need to prove that the tech that they've developed can actually work (which, in a single player environment, it ought to). NONE of my friends have any faith in the project and wrote it off years ago. Personally I'm skeptical I'll even want to play it with all the tedious sim-like mechanics. SQ42 will, I hope, present a slice of what SC will play like. And I sincerely hope I like it. Genuinely, I want to have my faith restored and believe that they're produce the amazing experience I backed for years ago.
But, well, you know. Nothing another "disgruntled player" or "salty vet" hasn't said already.
Welcome back to the annual copecon video y'all, how've you been this last year
lipstick not applyed correctly
nor spellcheck apparently
great to see your face from time to time
I'm volunteering at CitizenCon this year, absolutely can't wait!! Suppose I'll see you there :)
3-4 years out is insane. $700 mill you can afford to employ as many devs as needed. 1 year tops and then people are making their own star citizen with ai.
That is $700m over the last 12 years.
As an average that is 60m per year.
They have 1,200 people at the company
If they all have an average salary of 50k that equals..... 60m
You also have the costs of the office buildings they have acquired
the mocap studio, the patents, the licences for all the computers, branded clothes etc.
Concord cost 400m for a very average, linear game.
Enjoy the trip!
Is there anyone who still really believe in the CIG promise-marketing? Its all about "Saying big things, make the dreams huge and people will pay us for this even if we proved it we just lie."
See you there!
Enjoy CitCon!
Sadly cant afford to make it to citizencon all the way from deepest rural Devon in southwest UK. The piracy capital of the UK!
Would love to meet you, would be my main reason to attend ...i play the game so rarely now, but still have my ship and follow the "game's" (lack of) meaningful "progress" mainly via your uploads.
I'm at the point where i feel more like I'm following an ambitious tech project, than am an active player/citizen making my way in a huge open universe.
Strangely Elite gave me just this feeling probably 40 years ago, but achieving this feeling seems to be less important than the material chosen to finish the edging on the upholstery on a bar stool at a mining outpost in Star Citizen.
Im still impressed by the game (it's not really a game though), i still love your style. If you fancy a hike on Dartmoor ( it's peak shroom season right now) or a trip to some secret beaches, hmu 🎉. Its a beautiful part of the UK.
Enjoy CitizenCon (never has that suffix felt more accurate) and hopefully your questions will be given some genuine consideration, I think they know that you're someone it would be a very bad idea to just fob off with the same old nonsense.......and have a safe journey.
I want an architect's tour of your Airbus 380 or whatever you fly into London in too please. 😂.
CIG is making two of the first ever AAAA games. One is feature complete and the other just successfully tested server meshing which is no other game has at such an advanced level. It makes sense that the backend required to make the two most ambitious games ever will take a long time to complete before the "gaming" aspect can be properly worked on.
@@ErikLiberty (*AAAAA) I used to say similar shit to people back in 2017 when I bought my first , admittedly beautiful, ship. I now realise, in my case at least, it was me being defensive. "game" still LOOKS beautiful 😍
@@ErikLiberty yeah got to admit I feel proper stupid now..... expecting the developers of a GAME to have started working on the "GAMING" aspect of the game after just 15 years and well over half a billion spent on it.
I don't even care about Star Citizen at this point. I just want to play Squadron 42.
We still havent even gotten everything from last years citizencon. Dont have 4.0 or even full server meshing yet. How are we gna believe them for a release date for anything? CIG in the last 9 years ive been a backer has yet to release anything on time
I would be on your side but 4.0 Evo is out now. And they never did a major delay on an evocati patch, confirming it’s actually the next one
@@Giugiu7077 All it takes is for one thing to not work to shut it down, and we would never even know until 6 months later.
well sq42 doesnt hinge on the server meshing stuff or gameplay specific to SC.
@@canniballistic555 yea that happened in preview tech not in evocati, so it’s fair to say 4.0 is next
@@Giugiu7077 it is next.. after 3.24.2 minus some minor updates it'll be mostly only 4.0 testing remember second week of december is the key point
I just want vertical slices... Or a MAJOR vertical slice....
Been too long
WE ...NEED....VISUALS!!
Meet you there!
I'm more interested in what 1.0 means in terms of stability and playability. CIG is used to shipping garbage code because "its alpha". will that change or is 1.0 nothing more than alpha 4.1
What's the name of the song in the background?
What a great October! Robotaxi, Starship and Star Citizen! I love the world❤ and look forward to the bright future!
Lmao
Well, a 10% drop in Tesla stock price immediately after the Robotaxi announcement (and the general public reaction) isn’t a good sign many people share your excitement on at least that one but I guess we will see.
That said, not a bad pairing since Musk and SC do have a similar approach to selling expensive features with hype many years before they develop them like the original “vision” Full Self Driving, 2018 Mars launches and the many large ships and gameplay loops not yet in concept while continuing to pre sell new concepts. Don’t get me wrong, Tesla/SpaceX do some cool things, have made real tech advancements and same for SC but they all wildly over promise and under deliver years late.
Starship and SC’s just now going into 4.0 testing actually seem like an especially great comparison. Both are showing some solid fundamentals that are needed for what they have said they would do and sold stock based on (or expensive ships everyone knows will be years from now and are realistically largely investing in the game’s dev). But those fundamentals, yes done in impressive/harder new ways needed for the eventual goals they talk about that I really do hope they reach, don’t prove any new actual deliverable capabilities beyond what others in their industry have been proving for actual decades (like access LEO or have many players able to play together). Yes they are both done with a lot more complicated additions to support the end goal like catching the rocket/supporting all the granular ways SC wants to model spacecraft function but are a very long way from showing they can deliver a functional/consistent product with the new abilities they were sold on like access beyond Earth orbit or the large, immersive space game with the expensive large ships and stable/interconnected gameplay types/loops.
Just so you know, Star citizen 1.0 came out a couple years ago because of a lawsuit with a refund that they stated in their lawsuit against the guy asking for a refund that it was a full finished game that is now in a live testing. So it's already 1.0 we're already in 3.0 that's why the next thing is called 4.0
There’s a difference between an alpha 1.0/ beta 1.0 and a live 1.0
um no.. not even close.. where did you even pull that from..
Whatever random mess of things you decided to look at is far from the truth,
you don't even understand the lawsuit either apparently.
Its why incomptent morons who aren;t lawyers shouldn't talk about something they don't even understand
@@venividivicigaming2746 not in the lawsuit,
Tries to Be a citizen of star, gets stabbed by equatorial economic invaders. Prison island UK.
... we all know it's not gonna happen. Tell me I'm wrong.
Ya wrong
Its gonna happen but its not what everyone is going to expecting that why Morph and other content creators say its literally going to be a minimal viable product... People are clouded in their minds thinking what pie in the sky 1.0 is going to look like and will set over the top expectations without looking or thinking about their current and previous track record of them developing this game...
@@ratedxvn everyone should already know 1.0bwill be at best 5 systems with base professions etc. think what people really want to hear is their plans post 1.0 and how they’ll develop it, e.g will they push 1-2 systems out each 3-6 months with x amount of ships etc and develop upon professions
At this point I'm genuinely so apathetic towards SQ42, I just want that game to be done and out the door so it finally stops impeding SC's progress and we can get an acceptable pace of development going.
holy crap, you actually are real and not just a voice, feels weird
Any plans to visit Wasted again? Either way, enjoy your time in the UK.
what do you call that haircut? The "Art Garfunkel"?
Were you wearing lipstick?
One of these years, if we keep repeating it year after year. In 3 to 4 years we will have 1.0. and it actually be true.
Maybe.
see you there morth
SC 1.0 needs to be less than a year away, in my opinion.
My favorite thing they do is constantly fail at almost everything then tell everyone they are dropping the next stage. It’s a dumpster fire how can you be releasing the game soon lol.
I posted on the forum that Jupiter has 95 UNDISCOVERED moons and that this is great for 'discovery'. Nightrider deleted it ofc. PR is a bitch, and kind Ben left.... The project died years ago...
I disagree about 1.0 being so far out. I think it will be an MVP (Minimal Viable Product) containing all the core features/game loops. However on the content side, that would take years as CIG builds out more and more star systems.
Will you be doing a meet up in London at all?
I'll be attending at least 2 of the BarCitizen events before Citizencon, and then I may make it to the Atmo thing afterword.
None of it matters, until the kraken is in game.
John Lennon likes star citizen
When SC finally releases the people who spent 5-figures on the game and already have an entire fleet will have nothing to work towards. Why do that to yourself?
How do you know they wont?
Answer the Call! 2016, 2019.... My phone must be broken I keep trying to answer the call but there ain't nothing there
what the heck is a "high level overview" man xD
You're guessing 3-4 years for a Star Citizen 1.0 release???
spacex will land on Mars before SQ release...
See you there morph!
I really only care about squadron at this point. I am supporting and following star citizen but i wont play it until they have a better user experience(controller support, gameplay loop for people who dont want to deal with trolls, etc). I hope squadron comes out soon, because starfield did not scratch that itch for anyone
We're gonna have GTA VI before SC 1.0
Lottery numbers for this week's jackpot?
I look forward seeing you 😃
Remember REDACTED?
Do ya need some lip balm/vaseline?
was thinking the same
Look to Seven days to Die 1.0 as a model in my opinion. They were alpha for so long
mostly waiting for SQ42. Lost interest in SC since it's still nowhere ready to be playable with all the main components half working or fully absent...
Unpopular opinion, but I'm going to be hyped and stay hyped no matter what they present. I'm one of the apparently-few people who are pretty happy with the recent progress :)
(And I've been waiting since 2014)
ITS COMING EVERYONE! 😂
lol when were talking 3 or 4 more years in the future, you know its bad when it's been in developement for a good 10, 12 years already.
I only want to know one thing..... WHEN....
Okay, I am very sorry but I can't help it - You look like you're a Harkonen from DUNE 2000!
🤣