australia doesn't have accurate intellengence, there is never a model called J31, it was FC31 which is just company commercial model, J is PLAN official equirment serial model
@@Master_trac Yes, I think that I'd have to agree. Found and Explained does do videos about aircraft from many different nations, however, the narration does tend to be more kind and generous when talking about western aircraft. In addition, whenever the script has to explain a historical context, the scriptwriter does tend to use the West's "mainstream version" of history. Real engineering's videos are almost exclusively about western craft and western technology. To his defense, English may be the only language in which he can do his research. In any case, the narration tends to be slightly biased towards the west. Sandboxx believes that he is unbiased, however his videos are significantly biased towards "western views": Three channels which do a really good job at trying to be as unbiased as possible are "Millennium 7 *", "Greg's Airplanes and Automobiles" and "Alexander the ok".
Yeah I think the main selling points of J35 are the high efficiency, maintainability, and producibility. The production line of J20 in AVIC-Chengdu is full and PLAAF want more 5th fighters so they let AVIC-Shengyang join the game
One more perspective: with J-35, China can offer its allies (or willing-to-be allies) a more capable fighter planes. Such countries would have had to sell their soul in exchange for F-35. Now they realize they don't have to. They can keep their own identity and destiny, without adopting LGBT/democracy and the likes of concepts.
The real selling point of J35 is multi-role. J-20 is a dedicated air superiority fighter. Its entire design and function revolves around killing other aircraft, but as the Chinese sea-side holding expands and its influence grows, air to ship, air to ground mission need to be handled as well. These missions are currently handled by J-16, but eventually, a fifth generation version is required.
F35 is a bulky fat bird like a turkey while J35 is a sleeker, leaner, agile bird. For people saying ths is a copy of F35, they don't know what the heck they are talking about. Both have different configurations and specs. F35 is one engine while J35 is 2 engines.
The designation for the naval variant is not J-31B or J-31C. It is J-35. The land based variant is J-35A. Both of them do not have side weapon bay, which is more of the artwork of military fans. The engine that J-35A used in Zhuhai airshow is unlikely to be WS-19. But maybe we will see WS-19 soon.
1)At Zhuhai pretty sure it wasnt using the WS19 2)KF21 is not comparable to a J35, J35 is a finished (well nearly finished until the engines are mass produced) but the KF21 won't have internal weapons bay in its first variant, isn't actually that stealthy because of lack of materials, and will have an F18 engine not a natively produced 5th gen engine. It's like night and day.
Not really. South Korea has better active and passive sensors. Moreover, the Chinese are behind the west and not producing 5th gen engines. The reality is it’s the only area they are still behind the Russians
@@FancyPantsOnFireYou need to update your knowledge. Both J20 and j35 use China’s own engines. China’s GaN AESA radars are widely used and No.1 in the world.
@ Correction: no update necessary. Chinese engines are still behind Russias own fighter powerplants. It’s the only area they are still behind Russia, which is then behind the west. As for active n passive sensors, yes, the west have a distinctive advantage over China here. The AESAs found on our aircraft not only have better range, fidelity and processing power, but are more reliable. No fighter pilot is trading their apg81 or certainly the new apg85 over the Chinese counterpart.
Correction to beavis's (@农夫山贼有点田) "Rick Scott" says chinese garlic is a national security issue. The government of America never said chinese garlic is a security threat. Dumbie! Also I grow Italian garlic because it is MUCH better than the chinese garlic grown in god knows what 🤣
Truly one of the best military channels out there I have a big interest in eastern equipment and it's hard to find videos that aren't just West good East bad. I love the Chinese military they have so many cool aircraft and tanks can't forget the ships too so thanks for your coverage.
This channel is crap apart from a good deep mysterious style of voice acting. There's no naval variant named J-31B. FC-31, J-31 were names used during it's prototype phase. Once supported by the PLAAF, PLA navy, and export order from PAF, the official designation is J-35 for naval variant and J-35A for the air force variant. And no there were no side weapons bays in any of the variants. WS-19 engine is still under development and the engine used in zuhai airshow were stopgap WS-21 engines. It's expected that early production versions would be with WS-21 engines as well. KLJ-7A designated radar has at least 3 entirely different radar versions and no they aren't inherently inferior to any other Chinese AESA radar. So stop spreading fake/misleading info about the platform. The reason of J-35 being cheaper than J-20 isn't what the capitalist west can think of. Thanks to the Chinese communist party Govt, every tech and experience gained from the long ever evolving J-20 project can be easily transferred to the J-35 project so reducing the overall R&D costs. The shanyang and Chengdu would share the same tech pool when it comes to the PLA needs and they aren't free to rival and potentially try to sabotage each other like what Westerners can observe in their capitalist markets. J-35 is much smaller aircraft with much less hard points and less payload capacity than the J-20. So with a combination of relatively less R&D costs and overall smaller size fighter makes the J-35 much cheaper to buy and operate than the J-20 fighters. Chinese PLAAF and PLA Navy wouldn't be going cheap and deliberately cutting corners for their J-35 program just for the sake of being a cheap fighter.
For example when a new tech is introduced into the J-20 like new Hud, HMDS, missiles etc, then that piece of tech/equipment is trickled down to the entire PLAAF production line as needed. From J-20 to J-16 to J-10C to J-15 to JF-17 as and when required by the PLAAF. But the brunt of the R&D and testing cost would be billed by the J-20 program.
@M16_Akula-III KLJ-7A radar had at least 3 entirely different radar array setups and none of them were integrated in the JF-17. The radar used in JF-17 is the air cooled variant of the single array KLJ-7A radar, due to the nose size limitations of the JF-17 thunder. J-35 would likely use liquid cooled 3 array setup radar version of KLJ-7A radar with higher number of TR modules according to the nose radome of the J-35. But anything can only be confirmed when the serial production variants actually start to be inducted into the air force.
@@asimjabbar8445 The 3 array setup is 1 front array and 2 flank array, the front array is still as small as KLJ-7s, and the only source talking about J-35s using KLJ-7 was from 6-8 years ago.
The Luneberg lens is not a permanent fixture. It is removable for combat use. The purpose is to intentionally degrade the stealth characteristics of the aircraft during peace time and thereby deny accurate recording and assessment of the true radar signature.
@@DevTech.s that junk has been used by five countries Pakistan Myanmar Iraq Azerbaijan and Nigeria while your samosas are not even used by your own Air Force
The Lunerberg Lens is a feature made to increase the RCS, and not to diminish it. The main objective of that is to hide the real RCS of the airframe providing false datas to a potential adversary observing the flight of the aircraft
Great documentary with a relatively unbiased view. Conclusions are observational based with no embellishments. Still see the CCP's two hurdles being ranged support ( tankers ) which highlights the possible explanation for their "atoll" carriers and their reliability of systems and subsystems. Given technologies exponential advances, catching up is over the horizon. Their "Airpower Doctrine" suggests more stuff beats less stuff with little regards to sustainable interaction. I liken this to ' hoards of archers vs modern snipers with tactical support'.
1st : Thank you the invested time & effort for the creator of this video for this video Typing this after watching couple of secs of the Vid. V1.0 Sarcasm : It could call JSYFM-22’29 (a Raptor Protoype with a JSF intake/cabin smokey as a fulcrum LOL) V2.0 Thought : It is only for me make a DejaVu that is a mixed copy from the F22 ~ F35? I mean Yea I know Aerodynamics Design should be very similar in order for a similar required performance but at least that earlier demoed J20 have some unique creativity but this .. plus with an airforce emblem that looks like the WWII US (=*=) looks exactly a turmixed USAF craft .. but now I watch the full video ‘cos maybe my thoughts will answered there. :)
The initial model had some problems with the jet engine. But that problem has been resolved. The new model likely will be going onboard the new aircraft carrier Fujian.
J-35A is more like a multirole lightweight fighter similar to the KF-21 Boramae, F-16V Fighting Falcon and F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, while the US F-35A and F-35C is more like ground strike aircraft such as the old A-7 Corsair II.
Capacity too, for fuel, avionics, and ordnance. You can be a ripped lean hand-to-hand fighter, but it doesn't mean anything when you're popped from a distance by a husky sniper. And modern radars won't let even the stealthiest aircraft get into gunfight range completely undetected.
Be objective or politically neutral in reporting, so that you'll attract more audience; otherwise you'll have no edge in those politics- laced online commentators or reporters.
Ok I hate the mfs that always say "it's stolen" about everything Chinese, but like.... That is blatantly an F22, with perhaps a longer nose? And the engine nozzles seem a lot less stealthy, not sure why they went with cones there tbh
At least they succeed in making it somehow flatter with (two) smaller engines, allowing good rearward vision for the pilot. Something which made me scratch my head, with the F35. I mean, like, what is with that single monstrous power plant? Why they went that way? 😶
Large diameter engines contributing to a higher bypass are for fuel efficiency similar to the ones found on commercial jet liners. USAF is more concerned about fuel economy than supersonic performance. Hence F-35 has a larger combat radius than J-35 of around 750 - 800 nmi (1400 - 1500 km). Their is even a pilot leaking F-35 can even go further up to 900 nmi (~1650km). And this is b4 the engine core upgrades for Block IV. However with ACE for later blocks like GE's XA100 or P&W's XA101 it can have both fuel efficiency and supersonic performance. Still it will likely be limited to the same Mach 1.6 to maintain it's stealth coatings. Lastly, F-35's spherical DAS allows it to see though its cockpit giving it unmatched situational awareness.
For that last point, it shouldn't be a problem as the F35 helmet allows the pilot to see through the jet, and I guess it's more cost effective, or more efficient, to use one big expensive engine, rather than 2 small expensive engines.
@@johnsilver9338I think it may be a problem with the initial positioning of the F35. The F35 was not planned to be as heavy and large as it is now, and there was no need to excessively pursue air superiority. It was wise to use a single engine, but after adding electronic equipment, they realized that a single engine was not enough, but switching to a twin engine would lead to additional modifications, which might be as difficult as making a new aircraft. The J35 has obviously learned from the lessons of the F35 and no longer blindly pursues compactness.
@@johnsilver9338So, for the F35, I prefer to describe it as a bomber capable of air superiority, and for the J35, it is a fighter capable of ground attack.
I don't know where he is getting his information from. While I am glad he doesn't underestimate the eastern aircraft. Some of his information is outdated or incomplete. The engine at the airshow is the WS-21, or an upgraded WS-13. The navy is waiting on the WS-19 to be finished. For now the land variant uses WS-21/WS-13 upgrade. The Navy one is likely to called J-35, plain no letters behind the numbers. The land one is called J-35a. The export is likely J-35AE.
Will they sell these aircraft to Taiwan and Hong Kong so they can be free countries and not be ruled by China? Or will America have to destroy the CCP in a war so America can win World War 3?
The F35 is designed for stealth and network centric operations, and multirole flexibility not air dominance or high speed interception. Not all the details of the J35 are available but what is known is that, compared to the F35, it is less stealthy, has no sensor fusion, less situational awareness without a DAS equivalent, requires two engines due to lower performance compared to the F35s F135 engine performance, has a lack of battlefield networking capabilities and software and mission systems, has fewer advanced munitions, no operational history and is still undergoing testing, and has poorer logistics and maintenance due to a lack of a comparable ALIS.
Americans: coping and calling it crap yet they dont even know the capabilities. Meanwhile it took 10 countries to make the F35 at a cost of over a trillion. NGAD aint ever happening Indians: AMCA will be done in the year 2150 Chinese: we just released a 6th generation plane. We will not elaborate
The J35 twin engine when with the WS19 will be far far more powerful than the single F35 is obvious and can super cruise at 2.2 mach while the F35 can only do at most 1.4 with after burner for a few seconds. You should mention this as it is very important.
@@skyserf That part the F35 is no match for the Chinese far more advanced stealth and networkd operations. China even linked it to the J20 command centre in the air with loyal wingmen and proven to be far far better than the Americans wingmen systems . The J35 is also designed for ground targeting as well besides being a air superiority plane. More stealthy , longer range missiles and better communications systems .. linking the J20, J10c , J16 fighting a group has no equal.
@hkfoo3333 The video clearly discusses how the J35 cannot be as stealthy as the F35. The J35 has no DAS equivalent nor has there been any information released regarding networking. If you have a source to the contrary please provide it.
@@skyserf The DAS can be an advantage for the F35 in dogfights vs non stealth but not stealth planes as stealth planes would be not relly for dogfights like the J20 does not even have a gun Not critical as they would not be in a dogfight situation taking on each other head nearby rather than dog fight with DAS can be useful . More important is if both do battle , which plane will have the advantage . From the start the J35 or even J20 will have the advantage with its features from longer range and better radar system that can detect stealth esp lately reported 3 J20 can detect the F22F35 10000 times larger. More important is the speed and range of the missiles where J35 or J20 can fire first once detection by AWACS or by advanced wingmen etc . Both J20 and J35A having twin engines are able to supercruise besides a superior communications systems from quantum communication to 6G ....which is useful for drones loyal wingmen. I do agree until both do battel we do not actually know . We only know the J35A known features far out class the F35 which has lots of problems with 50% grounded.
@@skyserf btw, the video is obviously biased and assume that the J35A is less stealthy when China has even better stealth coating that can even change frequencies and able to even make non stealthy planes parts stealthy using plasma tech. There are a lot of new Chinese tech that are being developed .
Well, this video does not mention that a major advantage of J-35A over F-35 is its supersonic speed. Any military fan with sufficient knowledge knows that F-35 cannot go supersonic in a practical manner. Speed is vital even in a BVR air combat.
Ya , J35 can super cruise without after burners at mach 2.2 while the F35 at very very best able to do mach1.6 but more likely normally below supersonic speed So assuming the F35 is stationary, the J35 can still fly rings around the F35 !! with longer range missile the J35 will wipe out the F35 ...any time
@@hkfoo3333 well, the key issue is not the top speed, but how long it can last: F-35 can go supersonic for about 2 mins, above that some internal equipments will be over-heated.
@@biochemwang2421 incorrect not internal equipment . Its the outside radar absorb material. However upon testing they were unable to replicate the matter
Significant stealth can be obtained even with external stores. Not nearly to the same degree as with internal weapons only but still an improvement in detection and tracking range over previous fighters. Some stores also have semi stealthy characteristics and there are semi stealthy rails in development as well.
The reflectivity of canards depends greatly on the materials they are made from. While it is suboptimal to have them for maximum stealth it may be necessary to meet other design goals. The stealth penalty may not be as severe as some assume.
China has not had enough time to work out the bugs and refine the J-35. In the US, it takes years & years. They are still in the development stage in China. It is probably not combat ready yet. Comparisons with current fighters are premature.
hell the F-35 still has problems that needs to be ironed out and that's a craft that's still being worked on to this day even if China can copy some aspects of the craft, they won't be able to get the full picture
Excellent video! Looking at the pace by which China is apparently catching up while American and other western allies seem to have all sorts of troubles to make things work on time, within budget and without a multitude of difficulties, I think we can safely say that it is time to get very worried. The fact that some technological advances are thought to be made possible by stealing technology, is all the more alarming imho. First, it says a lot about western cyber security and worse a lot about Chinese ingenuity in that field. Second, the Chinese no longer seem to just copy, but add ideas of their own, improving on the original. And third, China seems to have no trouble getting comparatively far more bang for their yuans than the West gets for its bucks. I'm beginning to wonder if commercial and privately owned defense contractors still have the competitive edge.
All in all, we don't think Chinese cars in their current form can surpass the US, especially when it comes to EV batteries. Therefore, the US government wants to charge 100% tariff to prevent inferior Chinese cars from affecting the living standards of American consumers (it seems that the sales of Chinese EVs in Australia are not bad LOL)🤣
You realize many EV manufacturers use Chinese batteries, right? Many EVs made by Tesla, Toyota, Ford, BMW, and Mercedes use BYD blade batteries. Edit: Additionally, the tariffs were to prevent competition, Chinese EVs safety and quality tests are only inferior to Tesla.
@@SamSpade903 F35 is made for swimming pools cause it loves to dive, a trillion dollar crap with high maintanence and a look so ugly you wanna puke 🤮 streets are filled with junkies and addicts but america want to produce trillion dollar junk🤣 such a welfare state lol
@@1ycan-eu9jithe Volt engine is a dead weight for the size of F35 after taken off from the carrier. The Chinese engineer is finding a different or better design of Volt engine after taking off
australia doesn't have accurate intellengence, there is never a model called J31, it was FC31 which is just company commercial model, J is PLAN official equirment serial model
New infrastructure that's going sorely underutilized and still shrinking, but carries the same maintenance costs. That money should have really went to assisting Chinese private ventures and consumers, but that would risk politically empowering the Chinese people too.
J35 looks not bad, i think I would buy it instead of the F35 because it's much cheaper to buy and operate and certainly not much weaker. I mean who knows what the export version of the F35 really is capable of ??? Most likely the F35 has technology in there that is not allowed to export, so the export version is not as capable as the US version 🤔🧐. Same goes probably for the J35 but again, it's way cheaper to buy and to operate so the pilots got much more hours....
forget turkey and korea ..... they cannot build their jet fighters without the help from the west ..... even russia is having very hard time to build their new jet fighters ..... china is the only country who can pass US dominance
Something many people tend to forget when comparing jets. It will be exceedingly rare to see 1:1 combat. It's an entire web of capabilities which at the moment Chinese can't compete. For example, our king range capability is greatly enhanced by the number of tankers we have compared to the Chinese's. Sure if you do a 1:1 comparison they may have better stats, but they haven't caught up to combat tonnage yet Edit: made this comment premature. They highlight this in the video
Remember it’s the attacking force that needs to have significant numerical superiority. Also, China’s anti aircraft missiles are superior to the US AMRAA in range and detection
I don't think that any of the USA tanker will be able to fly anywhere near China for a 1200 miles radius. Their rocket force and A2AD ensures that. This was the sole reason why USA developed B-21 Raider bomber, to have a chance to penetrate Chinese defense bubble.
@@ajaykumarsingh702 China's Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) strategy is a multi-faceted military approach to limit the ability of other countries to access and operate in areas of the Asia-Pacific that China claims as its own: Purpose China's A2/AD strategy aims to deter outside intervention, particularly from the United States, in areas of interest like the South China Sea. Capabilities China's A2/AD strategy includes a range of capabilities, such as: Ballistic missiles Submarines Airplanes Coastal defense systems Anti-ship, anti-air, and anti-ballistic weapons Electronic warfare Antisatellite weapons Cyberwarfare Location China has built its A2/AD system around the East China Sea, the South China Sea, and the Strait of Taiwan. Impact China's A2/AD strategy has shifted the military balance in China's favor and limited the intervention capabilities of the US and its allies. Inspiration China's A2/AD strategy is based on the "Sea Denial" or "Bastion Strategy" used by the Russians.
You know what Russia and china did that completely sets their 5th Gen jets apart. The SU57, I assume su75, and mig 41 and Chinas stealth fleet is their jets have ai that can control loyal wingmen like okotnik. Russia also is testing a stealth loyal wingman who are giant stealth missile carriers to triple combat load of each jet, they can also fire a bunch of lancet loitering munitions or masive drone swarms that can locate, target close to 1k different targets that are either designated by on-board ai RIOs or just hit targets of opportunities or land and as enemy formations approach and switch on and lets just say do to them what lindsay Graham and Stephen Hawkins in his iron man molestation suit did to young boys on his epstein islands trips
12:40 i was told that we (in Sri Lanka) most of the time use dirty fuel for non-combat use by a pilot (civil) if so Russia and China could be doing the same, but i don't see why they would be doing that because they have the money !
An example of completely-befuddling-Chinese-copy-catism..? J35's front-hinged cockpit. Sure, it makes sense on the F-35B, as it at least has a LIFTING FAN to accommodate. J35 is also way better looking than F-35. Eg, its wing looks more like an F-22 than an F-35.
@@gonggxiu The People's Republic of China is employing a multi-faceted A2/AD strategy to exclude or deter as many adversary forces from acting within the waters it claims as its territorial waters as outlined by the nine-dash line. The initial impulse for this strategy is said to have been the deployment of two US carrier battle groups in the area, reacting to Chinese tests and exercises for a possible invasion of Taiwan in 1995, which went effectively uncontested by the Chinese navy.[9] The Chinese A2/AD strategy's main focus lies on sea denial by missiles (see also paragraph Sea), but features submarines and airplanes as well.[10] The Chinese denial capabilities are not sufficient to exclude Japanese and US troops from the South China Sea, but enough to inflict heavy casualties in case of a war for the occupation of Taiwan.[10]
Corrections: At 11:34 "the new WS-19s" - not "WS-19S"
the engine is likely to be ws-21(ws-13 upgrade).
australia doesn't have accurate intellengence, there is never a model called J31, it was FC31 which is just company commercial model, J is PLAN official equirment serial model
@@hcjetAt 4:25 the official navy image literally has 'J-31B' printed on the side of the nose
If China can dominate the world car market so fast, I have to imagine that they are already head and shoulders above others in war jets as well.
@@Kneecap22
It is WS19 and it has officially confirmed by a Major rank PLAAF HR in Zhuhai.
the finish of this bird is so polished. especially the underside. so streamlined
@@alsetalokin88 为隐身所需
厉害不😂
Who's here after the 6th gen reveal lmao
@@alexrator7674 me
@@alexrator7674 me
Me 😁. Just wanna remind this Channel: The content you released less than two weeks ago is already out of date. Pls update your content.
meeeeee
Me!! This video didn't age well !!
A fair, balanced, unbiased video. Something which keeps on getting rarer by the day.
do you agree that Found and Explained & Real Engineering's channel are more biased to the west ?
@@Master_trac Yes, I think that I'd have to agree.
Found and Explained does do videos about aircraft from many different nations, however, the narration does tend to be more kind and generous when talking about western aircraft. In addition, whenever the script has to explain a historical context, the scriptwriter does tend to use the West's "mainstream version" of history.
Real engineering's videos are almost exclusively about western craft and western technology. To his defense, English may be the only language in which he can do his research. In any case, the narration tends to be slightly biased towards the west.
Sandboxx believes that he is unbiased, however his videos are significantly biased towards "western views":
Three channels which do a really good job at trying to be as unbiased as possible are "Millennium 7 *", "Greg's Airplanes and Automobiles" and "Alexander the ok".
@@Master_tracnot just biased. What they do is collect every rumors, prop@gad@ and try to portray those as facts
I was looking for this exact comment
real
Yeah I think the main selling points of J35 are the high efficiency, maintainability, and producibility. The production line of J20 in AVIC-Chengdu is full and PLAAF want more 5th fighters so they let AVIC-Shengyang join the game
The design appears simplified therefore more optimized.
Especially since it doesn't need VTOL shenanigans.
One more perspective: with J-35, China can offer its allies (or willing-to-be allies) a more capable fighter planes. Such countries would have had to sell their soul in exchange for F-35. Now they realize they don't have to. They can keep their own identity and destiny, without adopting LGBT/democracy and the likes of concepts.
True @@oceanwave4502
@@oceanwave4502 Can’t agree more
The real selling point of J35 is multi-role. J-20 is a dedicated air superiority fighter. Its entire design and function revolves around killing other aircraft, but as the Chinese sea-side holding expands and its influence grows, air to ship, air to ground mission need to be handled as well.
These missions are currently handled by J-16, but eventually, a fifth generation version is required.
China's progress is mind blowing
When the blueprints and all the R&D is available from other countries no shit.
Yes that's we can agree.
If they continue to develop this way they will surely surpass American MIC in quality. They already produce more in quantity.
@@lyft4238 For example ,japan korean,both have F35 jet,but they Fifth generation aircraft Is it going well?
@@lyft4238Guess their IT systems are trash then lol
Yeah they can’t innovate so they copy.
F35 is a bulky fat bird like a turkey while J35 is a sleeker, leaner, agile bird. For people saying ths is a copy of F35, they don't know what the heck they are talking about. Both have different configurations and specs. F35 is one engine while J35 is 2 engines.
Rigorous, detailed, objective and fair. Underrated channel.👍👍
Great video, excellent research. Nice to see an intelligent unbiased analysis.
The designation for the naval variant is not J-31B or J-31C. It is J-35. The land based variant is J-35A. Both of them do not have side weapon bay, which is more of the artwork of military fans. The engine that J-35A used in Zhuhai airshow is unlikely to be WS-19. But maybe we will see WS-19 soon.
@@lwty If I recall correctly, there was a prototype that was flying with WS-19s during Zhuhai.
@ More like WS-21 with difference nozzles
@@lwty We'll see.
@ Sure. Would see many news in next 2-3 years.
The image at 4:25 was circulated by the PLAN, thats why many people assumed it has side weapons bays
1)At Zhuhai pretty sure it wasnt using the WS19
2)KF21 is not comparable to a J35, J35 is a finished (well nearly finished until the engines are mass produced) but the KF21 won't have internal weapons bay in its first variant, isn't actually that stealthy because of lack of materials, and will have an F18 engine not a natively produced 5th gen engine.
It's like night and day.
Not really. South Korea has better active and passive sensors. Moreover, the Chinese are behind the west and not producing 5th gen engines. The reality is it’s the only area they are still behind the Russians
@@FancyPantsOnFirenever buy into US MIC narrative.
@@chlim9478 I don’t need to. Military aviation is my bread n butter. I’m just
telling it like it is.
@@FancyPantsOnFireYou need to update your knowledge. Both J20 and j35 use China’s own engines. China’s GaN AESA radars are widely used and No.1 in the world.
@ Correction: no update necessary. Chinese engines are still behind Russias own fighter powerplants. It’s the only area they are still behind Russia, which is then behind the west. As for active n passive sensors, yes, the west have a distinctive advantage over China here. The AESAs found on our aircraft not only have better range, fidelity and processing power, but are more reliable. No fighter pilot is trading their apg81 or certainly the new apg85 over the Chinese counterpart.
The next 20 years will be interesting.
美国人说J35不会是国家安全威胁，而中国的大蒜才是真正的威胁😂
😂
@@农夫山贼有点田 只有吸血鬼才会害怕大蒜！
@@农夫山贼有点田 中国J35不是威胁了，因为马上要被中国人六代机代替了🤠
@@农夫山贼有点田 吸血鬼都怕大蒜😀
Correction to beavis's (@农夫山贼有点田) "Rick Scott" says chinese garlic is a national security issue. The government of America never said chinese garlic is a security threat. Dumbie! Also I grow Italian garlic because it is MUCH better than the chinese garlic grown in god knows what 🤣
Nice to see a fair and balanced review of a non NATO/US military aircraft, this channel is one of few that doesn't carry on like US fanboys
The durability and performance of these machines are beyond impressive!
Truly one of the best military channels out there I have a big interest in eastern equipment and it's hard to find videos that aren't just West good East bad. I love the Chinese military they have so many cool aircraft and tanks can't forget the ships too so thanks for your coverage.
This channel is crap apart from a good deep mysterious style of voice acting.
There's no naval variant named J-31B. FC-31, J-31 were names used during it's prototype phase. Once supported by the PLAAF, PLA navy, and export order from PAF, the official designation is J-35 for naval variant and J-35A for the air force variant. And no there were no side weapons bays in any of the variants. WS-19 engine is still under development and the engine used in zuhai airshow were stopgap WS-21 engines. It's expected that early production versions would be with WS-21 engines as well. KLJ-7A designated radar has at least 3 entirely different radar versions and no they aren't inherently inferior to any other Chinese AESA radar. So stop spreading fake/misleading info about the platform.
The reason of J-35 being cheaper than J-20 isn't what the capitalist west can think of. Thanks to the Chinese communist party Govt, every tech and experience gained from the long ever evolving J-20 project can be easily transferred to the J-35 project so reducing the overall R&D costs. The shanyang and Chengdu would share the same tech pool when it comes to the PLA needs and they aren't free to rival and potentially try to sabotage each other like what Westerners can observe in their capitalist markets. J-35 is much smaller aircraft with much less hard points and less payload capacity than the J-20. So with a combination of relatively less R&D costs and overall smaller size fighter makes the J-35 much cheaper to buy and operate than the J-20 fighters. Chinese PLAAF and PLA Navy wouldn't be going cheap and deliberately cutting corners for their J-35 program just for the sake of being a cheap fighter.
@@asimjabbar8445 The Chinese do not use the KLJ-7As for their J-35s. Those are for the JF-17s, which are far more smaller.
For example when a new tech is introduced into the J-20 like new Hud, HMDS, missiles etc, then that piece of tech/equipment is trickled down to the entire PLAAF production line as needed. From J-20 to J-16 to J-10C to J-15 to JF-17 as and when required by the PLAAF. But the brunt of the R&D and testing cost would be billed by the J-20 program.
@M16_Akula-III KLJ-7A radar had at least 3 entirely different radar array setups and none of them were integrated in the JF-17. The radar used in JF-17 is the air cooled variant of the single array KLJ-7A radar, due to the nose size limitations of the JF-17 thunder.
J-35 would likely use liquid cooled 3 array setup radar version of KLJ-7A radar with higher number of TR modules according to the nose radome of the J-35. But anything can only be confirmed when the serial production variants actually start to be inducted into the air force.
@@asimjabbar8445 The 3 array setup is 1 front array and 2 flank array, the front array is still as small as KLJ-7s, and the only source talking about J-35s using KLJ-7 was from 6-8 years ago.
Great video.
We need information and not biased contents. EXCELLENT!
Excellent overview. Thank you!
China is advancing by leaps and bounds. Great and innovative country.
I'm sorry to say it's a very lame attempt to make the situation in China apper just the same it is in the West.
@@막심골드-c6t You are right it is far better than the West.
The Luneberg lens is not a permanent fixture. It is removable for combat use. The purpose is to intentionally degrade the stealth characteristics of the aircraft during peace time and thereby deny accurate recording and assessment of the true radar signature.
Last month's Zhuhai Aviation Exhibition in China had the latest J35 videos. Why were these old videos shown?
J-35 is so...... November, China just test flight J-50 and J-36 on boxing day.
Please make a video about the Chinese-Pakistani JF-17.
@@jsvideos2261
Its a junk nothing else
@@DevTech.s so full of inflated ego. another term for this ... HOT FARTING and nothing else. 🤣🤣🤣
@@DevTech.s why describe yourself like this
@@DevTech.s that junk has been used by five countries Pakistan Myanmar Iraq Azerbaijan and Nigeria while your samosas are not even used by your own Air Force
It's the Chinese JF-17, which is bought in kit form by Pakistan and assembled over there.
This is by far the best video I have seen on this topic and provides an excellent summary of the current situation. Well done!!
Based on what? Feelings?😂
No ,it's not. Seems talking objectively, but at last The UP approves that China's progress comes from steading.
Shockers!!! 😮
Xi's Xmas gifts to Trump:
Two 6th Gen Stealth Fighters
076 Drone Carrier &
KJ-3000
The Pentagon should be alarmed!
Very reasonable comments in this video. Solid Analysis.
The Lunerberg Lens is a feature made to increase the RCS, and not to diminish it. The main objective of that is to hide the real RCS of the airframe providing false datas to a potential adversary observing the flight of the aircraft
dude, your reporting old news, the 6th gen already out on Christmas 2024.
圣诞快乐，中国6代机首飞了 还是两款 欢迎更新😂
@@yuny2023 love from Pakistan
Great documentary with a relatively unbiased view. Conclusions are observational based with no embellishments. Still see the CCP's two hurdles being ranged support ( tankers ) which highlights the possible explanation for their "atoll" carriers and their reliability of systems and subsystems. Given technologies exponential advances, catching up is over the horizon.
Their "Airpower Doctrine" suggests more stuff beats less stuff with little regards to sustainable interaction. I liken this to ' hoards of archers vs modern snipers with tactical support'.
I've got to say it is a good-looking fighter jet.
1st : Thank you the invested time & effort for the creator of this video for this video
Typing this after watching couple of secs of the Vid.
V1.0 Sarcasm : It could call JSYFM-22’29 (a Raptor Protoype with a JSF intake/cabin smokey as a fulcrum LOL)
V2.0 Thought : It is only for me make a DejaVu that is a mixed copy from the F22 ~ F35? I mean Yea I know Aerodynamics Design should be very similar in order for a similar required performance but at least that earlier demoed J20 have some unique creativity but this .. plus with an airforce emblem that looks like the WWII US (=*=) looks exactly a turmixed USAF craft .. but now I watch the full video ‘cos maybe my thoughts will answered there. :)
مليون نعم❤ للصين❤
Liked before watching🎉
thanks for the report
FC31 the Export variant are much cheaper than the F35 That is a definite advantage, anyway Pakistan will test them out next year.
巴基斯坦的朋友要等等，我们的出口型很可能会被命名J-35E或者J-35AE，巴基斯坦不可能明年就拿到飞机，研发这款飞机最重要的就是作为我们中国航母的5代舰载机，设计性能对标F-35C，所以不可能便宜大多。另外我们海军福建号航母要先装备，然后还有我们的空军，前期生产需要先满足我们的需求，我们基本会出售巴基斯坦，但至少要等3年后
Elon Musk dissing F-35
he doesn't know what he's talking about
@@admiralrng6506 as always
Thanks for Elon Musk's open source.
@@Godsplan-j9w
Open source....?
@@balckston a Chinese joke.
It may not be an F-35, but it looks like it'll still be a damn good tool for keeping the wrong sort off your lawn.
Fair analysis
17:56 "they" - an ungrammatical singular person copying or a plural "they" coz the singular agent was working with others to copy?
forget J35, it is OUTDATED
The initial model had some problems with the jet engine.
But that problem has been resolved.
The new model likely will be going onboard the new aircraft carrier Fujian.
The speed and agility of these vehicles are truly mind-blowing!
J-35A is more like a multirole lightweight fighter similar to the KF-21 Boramae, F-16V Fighting Falcon and F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, while the US F-35A and F-35C is more like ground strike aircraft such as the old A-7 Corsair II.
A plane in Flanker size cannot be lightweight fighter. Unless you consider Flanker as light weight
Bruh KLJ-7As are for the JF-17 line not J-34s, where fo you get your sources?
Amazing
F35 after losing weight
Now it weighs less than your mum
Add one more engine
F-35 is chunky lady.
Capacity too, for fuel, avionics, and ordnance. You can be a ripped lean hand-to-hand fighter, but it doesn't mean anything when you're popped from a distance by a husky sniper. And modern radars won't let even the stealthiest aircraft get into gunfight range completely undetected.
Now China is stronger than before bro
Be objective or politically neutral in reporting, so that you'll attract more audience; otherwise you'll have no edge in those politics- laced online commentators or reporters.
Ok I hate the mfs that always say "it's stolen" about everything Chinese, but like....
That is blatantly an F22, with perhaps a longer nose? And the engine nozzles seem a lot less stealthy, not sure why they went with cones there tbh
F35 also uses conic nozzles. There are trade-offs with flat nozzles. They are less efficient and vector only in 1 axis.
Chinese do not plan to operate outside of their own theatre, so refueling in mid air might not be a priority.
They don’t have a capable refueling fleet either.
@@skyserf don't worry it will happen
@paulzhang1310 I'm not worried in the slightest.
@@skyserflol YY20s says hi 👋
@@skyserf good
At least they succeed in making it somehow flatter with (two) smaller engines, allowing good rearward vision for the pilot. Something which made me scratch my head, with the F35. I mean, like, what is with that single monstrous power plant? Why they went that way? 😶
I think it was to keep VTOL capability and still fit on a carrier
Large diameter engines contributing to a higher bypass are for fuel efficiency similar to the ones found on commercial jet liners. USAF is more concerned about fuel economy than supersonic performance. Hence F-35 has a larger combat radius than J-35 of around 750 - 800 nmi (1400 - 1500 km). Their is even a pilot leaking F-35 can even go further up to 900 nmi (~1650km). And this is b4 the engine core upgrades for Block IV. However with ACE for later blocks like GE's XA100 or P&W's XA101 it can have both fuel efficiency and supersonic performance. Still it will likely be limited to the same Mach 1.6 to maintain it's stealth coatings. Lastly, F-35's spherical DAS allows it to see though its cockpit giving it unmatched situational awareness.
For that last point, it shouldn't be a problem as the F35 helmet allows the pilot to see through the jet, and I guess it's more cost effective, or more efficient, to use one big expensive engine, rather than 2 small expensive engines.
@@johnsilver9338I think it may be a problem with the initial positioning of the F35. The F35 was not planned to be as heavy and large as it is now, and there was no need to excessively pursue air superiority. It was wise to use a single engine, but after adding electronic equipment, they realized that a single engine was not enough, but switching to a twin engine would lead to additional modifications, which might be as difficult as making a new aircraft. The J35 has obviously learned from the lessons of the F35 and no longer blindly pursues compactness.
@@johnsilver9338So, for the F35, I prefer to describe it as a bomber capable of air superiority, and for the J35, it is a fighter capable of ground attack.
Naming it the J-35 has to be a pisstake
russian su57 = 22 + 35
@@lizhongshen and for the Su-75 checkmate, I wonder where the 75 number come from?
the chinese government is literally trolling at this point
@@villiamfangy6205 j means kill in CHinese
Check out the distortion of the canopy outside view @ 21:11
Yikes. It is horrible.
Is that even an image of reality? Looks like it might be AI generated.
12 days pass and now bro need a new video🤣🤣
I don't know where he is getting his information from. While I am glad he doesn't underestimate the eastern aircraft. Some of his information is outdated or incomplete. The engine at the airshow is the WS-21, or an upgraded WS-13. The navy is waiting on the WS-19 to be finished. For now the land variant uses WS-21/WS-13 upgrade. The Navy one is likely to called J-35, plain no letters behind the numbers. The land one is called J-35a. The export is likely J-35AE.
Will they sell these aircraft to Taiwan and Hong Kong so they can be free countries and not be ruled by China? Or will America have to destroy the CCP in a war so America can win World War 3?
Maybe the black smoke is a intentional misleading trap. 😂
It's nice to see China using their new F-35's
More like the F-35s younger hotter sister
@@domokun845 F 35 after watching out it's diet
Don't compare advance J35 to Fail 35; F35 is piece of junk.
Hey, we just flew two new type of 6th gen fighter bombers. Please update your video. And for your reference, they are not the White Emperor. Thanks
Looks like a better F-35, with super cruise ability something the F-35 cannot do.
The F35 isn’t an air superiority fighter so supercruise isn’t a design priority. Its C&C capabilities are vastly superior to anything China can field
Ok copy cat
F35 copied the Russian Yak 141.
@@stagecoachmechanicChina is not copy they are building real F35 ,For US wanted to build F35 but due to eat too much it turns to chubby false F35.😁
The F35 is designed for stealth and network centric operations, and multirole flexibility not air dominance or high speed interception. Not all the details of the J35 are available but what is known is that, compared to the F35, it is less stealthy, has no sensor fusion, less situational awareness without a DAS equivalent, requires two engines due to lower performance compared to the F35s F135 engine performance, has a lack of battlefield networking capabilities and software and mission systems, has fewer advanced munitions, no operational history and is still undergoing testing, and has poorer logistics and maintenance due to a lack of a comparable ALIS.
Americans: coping and calling it crap yet they dont even know the capabilities. Meanwhile it took 10 countries to make the F35 at a cost of over a trillion. NGAD aint ever happening
Indians: AMCA will be done in the year 2150
Chinese: we just released a 6th generation plane. We will not elaborate
The J35 twin engine when with the WS19 will be far far more powerful than the single F35 is obvious and can super cruise at 2.2 mach while the F35 can only do at most 1.4 with after burner for a few seconds.
You should mention this as it is very important.
The F35 is designed for stealth and network centric operations, and multirole flexibility not air dominance or high speed interception.
@@skyserf That part the F35 is no match for the Chinese far more advanced stealth and networkd operations. China even linked it to the J20 command centre in the air with loyal wingmen and proven to be far far better than the Americans wingmen systems .
The J35 is also designed for ground targeting as well besides being a air superiority plane. More stealthy , longer range missiles and better communications systems .. linking the J20, J10c , J16 fighting a group has no equal.
@hkfoo3333 The video clearly discusses how the J35 cannot be as stealthy as the F35. The J35 has no DAS equivalent nor has there been any information released regarding networking. If you have a source to the contrary please provide it.
@@skyserf
The DAS can be an advantage for the F35 in dogfights vs non stealth but not stealth planes as stealth planes would be not relly for dogfights like the J20 does not even have a gun
Not critical as they would not be in a dogfight situation taking on each other head nearby rather than dog fight with DAS can be useful .
More important is if both do battle , which plane will have the advantage .
From the start the J35 or even J20 will have the advantage with its features from longer range and better radar system that can detect stealth esp lately reported 3 J20 can detect the F22F35 10000 times larger.
More important is the speed and range of the missiles where J35 or J20 can fire first once detection by AWACS or by advanced wingmen etc .
Both J20 and J35A having twin engines are able to supercruise besides a superior communications systems from quantum communication to 6G ....which is useful for drones loyal wingmen.
I do agree until both do battel we do not actually know . We only know the J35A known features far out class the F35 which has lots of problems with 50% grounded.
@@skyserf btw, the video is obviously biased and assume that the J35A is less stealthy when China has even better stealth coating that can even change frequencies and able to even make non stealthy planes parts stealthy using plasma tech.
There are a lot of new Chinese tech that are being developed .
Well, this video does not mention that a major advantage of J-35A over F-35 is its supersonic speed. Any military fan with sufficient knowledge knows that F-35 cannot go supersonic in a practical manner. Speed is vital even in a BVR air combat.
Ya , J35 can super cruise without after burners at mach 2.2 while the F35 at very very best able to do mach1.6 but more likely normally below supersonic speed
So assuming the F35 is stationary, the J35 can still fly rings around the F35 !! with longer range missile the J35 will wipe out the F35 ...any time
@@hkfoo3333 well, the key issue is not the top speed, but how long it can last: F-35 can go supersonic for about 2 mins, above that some internal equipments will be over-heated.
@@biochemwang2421 incorrect not internal equipment . Its the outside radar absorb material. However upon testing they were unable to replicate the matter
External carriage of weapons AUTOMATICALLY means no stealth and Canards in the J-20 are also major radar reflectors as seen in the French RAFALE.
you are wrong regrading to canards
it's easy to say, but hard to prove.
Significant stealth can be obtained even with external stores. Not nearly to the same degree as with internal weapons only but still an improvement in detection and tracking range over previous fighters. Some stores also have semi stealthy characteristics and there are semi stealthy rails in development as well.
The reflectivity of canards depends greatly on the materials they are made from. While it is suboptimal to have them for maximum stealth it may be necessary to meet other design goals. The stealth penalty may not be as severe as some assume.
Canards are not different than horizontal stabilizer
Great looking jet just like the F-35 is 🤣 Know what I'm saying ? Also the Shenlong is an awesome looking spacecraft just like the X-35B too !
Annoying intrusive music.
J-35 PLANAF version, PLAN paid most of the fee.
J-35A PLAAF version, PLAAF just take some advantage.
J-35AE exprot version
中国加油
J35还没满月呢
China has not had enough time to work out the bugs and refine the J-35. In the US, it takes years & years. They are still in the development stage in China. It is probably not combat ready yet. Comparisons with current fighters are premature.
hell the F-35 still has problems that needs to be ironed out and that's a craft that's still being worked on to this day
even if China can copy some aspects of the craft, they won't be able to get the full picture
Incorrect.
This is clearly the final refined version of the once prototype that was seen a decade ago.
Excellent video!
Looking at the pace by which China is apparently catching up while American and other western allies seem to have all sorts of troubles to make things work on time, within budget and without a multitude of difficulties, I think we can safely say that it is time to get very worried.
The fact that some technological advances are thought to be made possible by stealing technology, is all the more alarming imho.
First, it says a lot about western cyber security and worse a lot about Chinese ingenuity in that field.
Second, the Chinese no longer seem to just copy, but add ideas of their own, improving on the original. And third, China seems to have no trouble getting comparatively far more bang for their yuans than the West gets for its bucks.
I'm beginning to wonder if commercial and privately owned defense contractors still have the competitive edge.
All in all, we don't think Chinese cars in their current form can surpass the US, especially when it comes to EV batteries. Therefore, the US government wants to charge 100% tariff to prevent inferior Chinese cars from affecting the living standards of American consumers (it seems that the sales of Chinese EVs in Australia are not bad LOL)🤣
😂😂
You realize many EV manufacturers use Chinese batteries, right? Many EVs made by Tesla, Toyota, Ford, BMW, and Mercedes use BYD blade batteries.
Edit: Additionally, the tariffs were to prevent competition, Chinese EVs safety and quality tests are only inferior to Tesla.
You see, the Chinese can't possibly make better batteries than US. So US use Chinese batteries to show how crappy they are.
(This is sarcasm)
@@Simulcrom 特斯拉用的是catl的电池，不是byd的，catl的磷酸铁锂电池性能更好一些
@@nmrm7838 Tesla uses both. Tesla model Ys made in the Berlin Gigafactory use BYD blade batteries.
Repetitive click sound is monotonous.
"The F-35 is not a Low in a High Low mix" No, it isn't - but it was supposed to be
The fifth generation fighter that lost the competition with J20 is another three-wing aircraft, not the FC-31
There’s a reason it looks like the Wish version of the F 35
It looks thinner because it doesn't have to include VTOL in its design consideration, since it will work primarily with catapults.
It actually looks way better then fat Amy to be honest
@@SamSpade903 F35 is made for swimming pools cause it loves to dive, a trillion dollar crap with high maintanence and a look so ugly you wanna puke 🤮 streets are filled with junkies and addicts but america want to produce trillion dollar junk🤣 such a welfare state lol
@@1ycan-eu9jithe Volt engine is a dead weight for the size of F35 after taken off from the carrier. The Chinese engineer is finding a different or better design of Volt engine after taking off
It looks better than the f35 tbh
3:03 / 9:59
How U.S. Military Strength in 2025 ?
australia doesn't have accurate intellengence, there is never a model called J31, it was FC31 which is just company commercial model, J is PLAN official equirment serial model
"It's a copycat"
So, what? China is spending money on large scale infrastructure projects, rather than spending money on R&D for fighter planes.
Copy? How? Proof it; plus J35 beats F35 in every single way; no diving function tho🤭
说J35抄袭了F35是西方式愚蠢和无能的表现
New infrastructure that's going sorely underutilized and still shrinking, but carries the same maintenance costs. That money should have really went to assisting Chinese private ventures and consumers, but that would risk politically empowering the Chinese people too.
Chinese 6th gen fighter jet has been officially leaked today, on Chairman Mao's birthday, not one, but two types😃
J35 looks not bad, i think I would buy it instead of the F35 because it's much cheaper to buy and operate and certainly not much weaker. I mean who knows what the export version of the F35 really is capable of ??? Most likely the F35 has technology in there that is not allowed to export, so the export version is not as capable as the US version 🤔🧐. Same goes probably for the J35 but again, it's way cheaper to buy and to operate so the pilots got much more hours....
@@robertb.3651 不可能卖给你们，
Would be tough beating the F35, that one has amphibious capabilities
@espionage84 尽管去买好了，和我有什么关系。
@@espionage84J35 beats F35 in every single way.😎
@@kinwai27271I can tell you it's Chinese.
Great analysis !!!..... but too fast outdated !!! 😪
What J-35 shows the best is the failure of US to secure the critical infrastructure of their F-35 contractors
It is not new, but it is contemporary.
without Rare Earth Elements
F-35 is no more
@@cityhunterhf or it's missiles which is even more disturbing since you need larger quantities
+99999 social credit score
Production Rare earth means lots of radioactive exposure.
Without Chinese basic ingredients for medicine, the whole healthcare system of the US would collapse.
Realy I like this powerful fighters jets
The long US dominance in stealth jets is over with Russia, China, Turkiye & Korea had successful developed their advance stealth jets.
forget turkey and korea ..... they cannot build their jet fighters without the help from the west ..... even russia is having very hard time to build their new jet fighters ..... china is the only country who can pass US dominance
I can’t tell whether your narration is natural or AI.
@@bombfog1 Ai
@ Thank you. Much appreciated.
Something many people tend to forget when comparing jets. It will be exceedingly rare to see 1:1 combat. It's an entire web of capabilities which at the moment Chinese can't compete. For example, our king range capability is greatly enhanced by the number of tankers we have compared to the Chinese's. Sure if you do a 1:1 comparison they may have better stats, but they haven't caught up to combat tonnage yet
Edit: made this comment premature. They highlight this in the video
Remember it’s the attacking force that needs to have significant numerical superiority. Also, China’s anti aircraft missiles are superior to the US AMRAA in range and detection
I don't think that any of the USA tanker will be able to fly anywhere near China for a 1200 miles radius.
Their rocket force and A2AD ensures that.
This was the sole reason why USA developed B-21 Raider bomber, to have a chance to penetrate Chinese defense bubble.
@@ajaykumarsingh702 China's Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) strategy is a multi-faceted military approach to limit the ability of other countries to access and operate in areas of the Asia-Pacific that China claims as its own:
Purpose
China's A2/AD strategy aims to deter outside intervention, particularly from the United States, in areas of interest like the South China Sea.
Capabilities
China's A2/AD strategy includes a range of capabilities, such as:
Ballistic missiles
Submarines
Airplanes
Coastal defense systems
Anti-ship, anti-air, and anti-ballistic weapons
Electronic warfare
Antisatellite weapons
Cyberwarfare
Location
China has built its A2/AD system around the East China Sea, the South China Sea, and the Strait of Taiwan.
Impact
China's A2/AD strategy has shifted the military balance in China's favor and limited the intervention capabilities of the US and its allies.
Inspiration
China's A2/AD strategy is based on the "Sea Denial" or "Bastion Strategy" used by the Russians.
You know what Russia and china did that completely sets their 5th Gen jets apart. The SU57, I assume su75, and mig 41 and Chinas stealth fleet is their jets have ai that can control loyal wingmen like okotnik. Russia also is testing a stealth loyal wingman who are giant stealth missile carriers to triple combat load of each jet, they can also fire a bunch of lancet loitering munitions or masive drone swarms that can locate, target close to 1k different targets that are either designated by on-board ai RIOs or just hit targets of opportunities or land and as enemy formations approach and switch on and lets just say do to them what lindsay Graham and Stephen Hawkins in his iron man molestation suit did to young boys on his epstein islands trips
中国🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍
12:40 i was told that we (in Sri Lanka) most of the time use dirty fuel for non-combat use by a pilot (civil) if so Russia and China could be doing the same, but i don't see why they would be doing that because they have the money !
Temu f35
yeah, F35 is temu product
@adam68756 ccp bot
This video is already outdated.
China just released TWO new working NGAD's
China hasn't released anything yet. All we have on the aircraft is speculation as to what they actually are.
An example of completely-befuddling-Chinese-copy-catism..? J35's front-hinged cockpit.
Sure, it makes sense on the F-35B, as it at least has a LIFTING FAN to accommodate.
J35 is also way better looking than F-35. Eg, its wing looks more like an F-22 than an F-35.
The J35 took cues (and likely blueprints) from both. That's why it appears a mix of the two.
对中国人来说，J35已经过时了，就是这么快。就在这几天，第6代中国歼轰战机出来了，已经看过了被路人拍到的视频录像。
在哪能看到类似消息？我搜了一下，没找到
@@yanfeili6517 某些军迷拍到的，现在被下架了 传说中的JH-26。J20S也被拍到了。
行走的50万，报一下你的地址好吗？
@@gonggxiu Shut up CCP.
@@gonggxiu The People's Republic of China is employing a multi-faceted A2/AD strategy to exclude or deter as many adversary forces from acting within the waters it claims as its territorial waters as outlined by the nine-dash line. The initial impulse for this strategy is said to have been the deployment of two US carrier battle groups in the area, reacting to Chinese tests and exercises for a possible invasion of Taiwan in 1995, which went effectively uncontested by the Chinese navy.[9] The Chinese A2/AD strategy's main focus lies on sea denial by missiles (see also paragraph Sea), but features submarines and airplanes as well.[10] The Chinese denial capabilities are not sufficient to exclude Japanese and US troops from the South China Sea, but enough to inflict heavy casualties in case of a war for the occupation of Taiwan.[10]
√ J35 J35A J35AE
× J35B J35C ...
GaN radar is one generation ahead than f35.
pl15 is gereration ahead than arm 120d.
Can you please make video on Mitsubishi X 2 shinshin, it would be really appreciated.
Instead of saying Made In China should say Copied In China ….
@JDqs-kg5sp what the hell are you on about, I was asking about the Japanese x 2 shinshin. Get your head together.
@@JDqs-kg5sp
WTF...😅😅
is this a reupload