The Growing Megafire Crisis - and How to Contain It | George T. Whitesides | TED

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ค. 2023
  • Megafires, or fires that burn more than 100,000 acres, are becoming more frequent worldwide, wreaking havoc on landscapes and communities -- and fire experts say the problem is only going to get worse. George T. Whitesides is focused on fighting these devastating natural disasters through innovative technologies and intentional changes to how we build communities. He presents three emerging solutions to this blazing dilemma, calling for us to redefine our relationship with fire in order to build a more resilient and sustainable future.
    Countdown is TED’s global initiative to accelerate solutions to the climate crisis. The goal: to build a better future by cutting greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2030, in the race to a zero-carbon world. Get involved at countdown.ted.com/sign-up
    Learn more about #TEDCountdown:
    Twitter: / tedcountdown
    Instagram: / tedcountdown
    Facebook: / ted
    Website: countdown.ted.com
    If you love watching TED Talks like this one, become a TED Member to support our mission of spreading ideas: ted.com/membership
    Follow TED!
    Twitter: / tedtalks
    Instagram: / ted
    Facebook: / ted
    LinkedIn: / ted-conferences
    TikTok: / tedtoks
    The TED Talks channel features talks, performances and original series from the world's leading thinkers and doers. Subscribe to our channel for videos on Technology, Entertainment and Design - plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. Visit TED.com to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more.
    Watch more: go.ted.com/georgetwhitesides
    • The Growing Megafire C...
    TED's videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (or the CC BY - NC - ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy: www.ted.com/about/our-organiz.... For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at media-requests.ted.com
    #TED #TEDTalks #wildfire
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 72

  • @DennisCambly
    @DennisCambly 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Do the corporations have any responsibility when the strip mine a forest and leave everything except the stripped tree behind?

    • @DennisCambly
      @DennisCambly 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@austindenotter19 I can show you photos of so-called reclamation. You won't see the strip mining of forests along the main highways. What you don't see you don't know.

  • @justicegreen4055
    @justicegreen4055 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    OMG we don't need bots and robots, we need goats clearing brush and arborist doing controlled burns. It already works, why is everything a bot or robot, JFC!

    • @cacaoscotti4827
      @cacaoscotti4827 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      money

    • @skozlozlaurie712
      @skozlozlaurie712 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      A-"greed".

    • @Boro2p
      @Boro2p 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's about scale, speed and efficiency. There is much much work thats needs to be done to maintain and evolve the world you live in, than it was few hundreds years ago. We take care of the electrical grid, internet, cars, tourism, big houses, technologies people use every day. It needs care as well and there is not enough people, not enough specialized people and it takes a lot of time and effort to train all the people.
      There were times when there was no plants on this world, no mushrooms, no mammals, no humans, no villages, no cities, no computers, no robots. What makes you think you know better than nature what kinds of structures are needed for the stage of life this planet is in?

    • @BennettWineholt
      @BennettWineholt 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Speaking of controlled burns and technological innovation, it does seem like a shame to release so much carbon to avoid larger scale fires. Are there or could there become any scalable firebreak creation technologies that pyrolyze into biochar or organize and bury felled trees to both stop megafire and capture a majority of stored tree biomass carbon?

    • @justicegreen4055
      @justicegreen4055 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Boro2p LOL you asked how I know better than nature, but think somehow bots and robots are more efficient than natural methods, LOLL
      Good looking out.
      This happens effortlessly in healthy ecosystems. Return the animals that naturally exit in nature and connect the ecosystems with wildlife corridors. It's already shown to restore environments and reduce the incidence of wildfires and floods. My masters is in climate change and sustainability. Arborists and goats (which don't need to be trained to eat underbrush, they just need to pen off the area where goats work) are only needed in densely populated areas. It's not expensive at all, it saves a crap-ton of money - actually. And the reason we don't have more arborists is because the have gutted the EPA. Best job you can hope for is one in a national park where you get to live there but still have to pay rent. I almost became an arborist. But those jobs are funded through taxes, and I can already tell a conversation about taxes with you is useless. One person making billions on bots rather than 5 people making a living wage is not sustainable, and that's the future you are proposing.
      I literally dedicated my life to this, but cool bro I'm sure you're an internet expert on everything.

  • @toni4729
    @toni4729 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You can't contain fires at the massive speeds at which they travel. If it's windy, fire flies, every leaf and spark will fly with the wind and the higher the fire, the faster it flies.

  • @vmwindustries
    @vmwindustries 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    We need all the help we can get! Canada, Russia, (supposed to be snow, and wet) and the Amazon Rain forests have been burn like crazy for a long time! Why does nobody talk about this?

  • @1ofakind632
    @1ofakind632 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks ❤

  • @toni4729
    @toni4729 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How far do you expect a chinook to fly when a fire starts? How many do you think you need? A thousand for California? How long will it take to get to a fire? How much to they cost, fifty million dollars each?

  • @93VIDEO
    @93VIDEO 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    🌳=🌧=💧All trees make it rain except conifers and eucalyptus ... Deciduous trees strengthen the water cycle, while conifers and eucalyptus create megafires.🌲=🔥

  • @lyflaf2533
    @lyflaf2533 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    prescribed burns only make drying out of forests worse.the bacteria in soil that trees use to network is destroyed ultimately creating weaker less quality lumber.while also creating monocultured treed forest

  • @The6thelement9413
    @The6thelement9413 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    In NYS, we have Forest Management. Our Fire Departments do controlled burns. We had a large fire during the pandemic having no rain for months giving NYC a drought as well. I contribute that fire to the pandemic bc we did not have the manpower and climate changes. Our fire department for the most part consists of volunteers.
    Thank you for this presentation. Maybe it will wake up the climate change non-believers.

  • @ahmadqadeibalban3776
    @ahmadqadeibalban3776 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    "ultimately, we need to become the crew of spaceship earth, so let's get to work, let's learn from fire, and let's build a resilient sustainable future"

  • @dougclem7711
    @dougclem7711 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    DRY ICE BOMBS!

  • @HappySlappii
    @HappySlappii 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    This is just called Forest Management in Michigan.

    • @SylvainDuford
      @SylvainDuford 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Forest management helps in built-up areas, but it doesn't do miracles. And you try and do forest management in vast wild and uninhabited areas of Canada and Russia that are larger than the entire USA.

    • @LaurelKashinn
      @LaurelKashinn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Reductionism is derogatory and not an effective solution.

    • @HappySlappii
      @HappySlappii 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@SylvainDuford those vast areas in canada that are on fire "to that level' are result of global warming. Those fires that are in California are part of the ecosystem historically then people build their summer homes on unmanaged forest land and some smart guy probably with a summer home vested in that area makes a TED talk video.

  • @user-cr4iv7bs6n
    @user-cr4iv7bs6n 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    good

  • @toni4729
    @toni4729 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Absolutely NO BURNS.... That's been done in Australia for hundreds of years and it doesn't work. We need animals to feed on that stuff. To eat what you plan on hurning. Burning will only destroy the land, we need to feed it well.

  • @toni4729
    @toni4729 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You're talking about burning it all down and now you're talking about building it up again? Which is it? You can't have both.

  • @sojournern
    @sojournern 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As climate change gets worse these (very concerning) surprises seem to be coming along more and more.

  • @nadezhdatimofeeva1117
    @nadezhdatimofeeva1117 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Maybe just stop spraying chems in the air for a decade for example.. and see if the fires are as severe and reacquiring as often?? Don’t cure the symptoms , look at the cause.

  • @user-ou4qw7md6v
    @user-ou4qw7md6v 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    日本のみんなこれを見て受験勉強頑張ろう!夏を制そう

  • @anonanon2031
    @anonanon2031 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    natives never stopped fires from approaching cities, that is non-sense, and gets repeated constantly

  • @RehanRC
    @RehanRC 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Two individuals from George Mason University developed a subsonic fire extinguisher. Combine it with a team of air moving drones and you can solve your problem.

  • @srcarranza
    @srcarranza 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    AVA aircraft vigilance & attack. Dedicated SEAT's. Public aerial firemen. Chinook's are so expensive to operate that fire managers hesitate to deploy them. SEAT's flight hour is so inexpensive that these should be deployed to hunt for fires. Aircraft vigilance and INSTANT attack. Has been done. Has been proven. It hasn't catched on because of going against business's interest, sadly.

  • @isiqhwaga_sangakini6814
    @isiqhwaga_sangakini6814 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He said (discovery)😂😂😂😂...

  • @daverussell9627
    @daverussell9627 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    New guy at the WUI wildfire table. Home Ignition Zone, WUI fuels reduction and RX Fire. NOTHING USEFUL HERE...

  • @debrahumbles6063
    @debrahumbles6063 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow do something to bethanny garcia

  • @madmanthepope6448
    @madmanthepope6448 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Dystopia

  • @ElectricIguana
    @ElectricIguana 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why not just allow lumber companies to cut a grid into high risk forested areas. This would create natural barriers to slow the spread of mega fires, while helping to lower home building costs. Harvesting that lumber rather than burning it down would create a new industry, create tons of jobs, and offset (if not eliminate) the costs of the fire prevention measures. Like allowing hunters to buy tags for over populated areas.

    • @Bushman9
      @Bushman9 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Correct in theory, but it’s not about allowing the lumber companies to cut grids, it’s about making them.
      They clear cut huge swaths of land because it’s efficient.

  • @Vinegaroon
    @Vinegaroon 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We know that the forest in cally burn and we keep building in them. Also many of the fires are man made. I wish I could spare sympathy but I can’t…

  • @MrJoeybabe25
    @MrJoeybabe25 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is not a job for government, rather it is a job, obviously in my opinion, for the insurance companies.
    Bureaucrats come and go and carry little true responsibility.
    Insurance companies have many obligations, to the home owner and especially to stock holders.
    It is in their interest to take on the problem more seriously.

    • @bubbag8895
      @bubbag8895 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Very good point

    • @dondoodat
      @dondoodat 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Insurance companies are in it for the money.
      It's easier for them to just hike the premiums for those in danger or refuse to insure them at all.
      They aren't going to spend money making an area safe for people who might not even have insurance, or are insured with a different company.

    • @hippymoustacherides
      @hippymoustacherides 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They got our money…. I mean they got the money!

    • @MrJoeybabe25
      @MrJoeybabe25 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dondoodat Insurance companies do not usually engage in private regulation like what I propose because, like most of us, we think its all covered well by the government.
      Well, it's not. The public sector has failed here, and it is time to have insurance companies step up and do their job.
      Which they will have to do if they want to make money insuring people and avoid having to put it out.
      And if the people in these areas cannot get insurance, they should not live there...and then sup at the taxpayers table.
      The court system is right there to adjudicate disputes that will invariably arise.
      Perfect? NO! Better? YES!

    • @dondoodat
      @dondoodat 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MrJoeybabe25
      No, it's totally impractical.
      Are you going to force people to take out insurance, or are you going to get the government to repossess their homes if they refuse to ?
      If ten houses in a local area have ten different insurers, which one are you going to force to do the work and under what penalty if they don't ?
      If there is still a fire afterwards, will the insurance company be prosecuted for not doing a good enough job ?
      What you're trying to do is force a company to do something that isn't in their interests, how do you intend to force them to do it ?
      It would never work, sorry.
      You might as well make security companies responsible for preventing people from becoming criminals.

  • @Nic03187
    @Nic03187 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    WHAT is CHUZPA?
    When a pyromaniac not only tries to charge u 10 grant for his DEW expences (gasoline, flamethrower, helpers etc)... BUT additionaly sues u for 10 Million bucks for a self inflicted sore thumb suffered in the act of >burning down ur house.

  • @xtc996
    @xtc996 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The best way to manage fires is to manage the landscape before the fire ever happens. This means logging.

    • @lyflaf2533
      @lyflaf2533 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      o lord help us.ur mentality has poisoned us for too long

  • @Rahulshahrps
    @Rahulshahrps 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Let Earth manage as it has done since 4.5 billion years

  • @Tirani2
    @Tirani2 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You lost me the minute you started describing fire as a moral problem rather than as a environmental one.

  • @eronthomas6829
    @eronthomas6829 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One thing that might help is for you all to stop blaming arson on the climate.

  • @Sal3600
    @Sal3600 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Better not link it to climate change.

  • @davenz000
    @davenz000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Jail the arsonists that are starting many of these fires for one.

    • @The6thelement9413
      @The6thelement9413 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is unknown many times how fires start. How can one find the arsonist in a forest of thousands of acres? Lightning starts many of them when it’s very dry. I live in a mountainous area near six digit acreage of forest. We have a preserve and a state park. Controlled burns are performed regularly. During COVID it had stopped which I believe is part of the problem we’re having now.

    • @dondoodat
      @dondoodat 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Tell people you don't believe in climate change without telling people you don't believe in climate change.

    • @dondoodat
      @dondoodat 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@austindenotter19
      You claiming that environmentalists are destroying the environment to prove a point ?
      Do you have any evidence to substantiate such a claim ?

    • @davenz000
      @davenz000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dondoodat Climate change isn't starting the fires. Unless that's the name of an arsonist.

  • @janchristensen8704
    @janchristensen8704 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What about “stop burning fossile fuels”?

  • @debrahumbles6063
    @debrahumbles6063 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    12233

  • @trader2137
    @trader2137 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    if we CUT DOWN all the trees in hazardous areas the fire problem would have no place...

  • @Lorenzo1972.
    @Lorenzo1972. 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do people still watch TED Talks? I thought they had become Woke Struggle Sessions.

  • @dyingfromthelying
    @dyingfromthelying 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well I got some real bad news for you. It's way way way too late... The window of opportunity to manage our forests and set controlled fires is no longer. There is no time in the season that that is safe to do anymore. Bye-bye. Don't believe me. Ask experts in fire behaviour that have been studying this for a long time.. too late...

  • @marcvolpe8252
    @marcvolpe8252 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    TONIGHT ENJOY A PLATE OF PASTA CON BROCCOLI RABE