The Weird Experiment That Defies Logic
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024
- Quantum entanglement still stumps scientists today. Try brilliant.org/... for FREE for 30 days, and the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual premium subscription.
Video on the double-slit experiment: • The Weird Experiment t...
CORRECTION: @3:44 should say 1,200 km, not 12,000 km on-screen
Follow Newsthink on X x.com/Newsthink
Newsthink is produced and presented by Cindy Pom
x.com/cindypom
Grab your Newsthink merch here: newsthink.crea...
Thank you to our Patrons, including:
John & Becki Johnston
Igli Laci
Support us on Patreon: / newsthink
Select images/video supplied by Alamy.
![[🔴LIVE] งานประกาศรางวัล MAYA TV AWARDS 2024 : มายามหาชน](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nwmWYXXVwBY/mqdefault.jpg)
*What other videos would you like to see?*
CORRECTION: @3:44 should say 1,200 km, not 12,000 km on-screen
Try brilliant.org/Newsthink/ for FREE for 30 days, and the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual premium subscription
Would love to see a video of Larry and Sergey building an empire from a garade
Any thoughts about videos of Blackholes!!!
Like most things in physics I suspect that there’s a simple explanation for this which we are yet to discover.
Or is just pure conjecture based upon layers of conjecture.
As far as I know
1) Entanglement comes from the common past of both particles. Quantum mechanics itself is time invariant (unitary). The arrow of time comes from the increase of entropy. Whether time is ergodic and stuff repeats itself over and over is the other question then.
2) The limits of entanglement determine the fundamental complexity of nature.
3) Entanglement is basis-dependent. Let's say Alice and Bob share an entangled pair of qubits and agree on a basis to measure. They also agree before that Alice measures first. Alice measures her qubit and gets some result (e. g. blue). Then Bob will get the same result or the opposite result depending on the shared state. But they have to measure subsequential. In that case the information (who goes first, what to measure) is transmitted before.
4) Entanglement allows for certain no go proofs in quantum communication which has no real equivalent in classical cryptography. The assumption underlying our crypto is that some computation is hard classically (e. g. factoring) because no one has found an efficient algorithm yet. The assumption underlying quantum communication is that certain theorems about entanglement hold. Personally I'd rather bet on the latter as physics is the best tested science and quantum mechanics is the best tested physical science so far with a track record of performing the same experiments over and over again for over 100 years. But both are just assumptions.
5) You can use quantum entanglement to win certain games with a higher probability than is classically possible. Playing these games in reverse delivers security protocols and proofs used in quantum communication. Why is this possible? I have no idea. The mathematics behind it are quite simple - the physical consequences are still difficult to grasp.
Entanglement messes with time.
While I’m sure you’re probably right, the only thing absolutely certain about is it messes with my mind 🥺
@@BluBlu777 😂
@user-ky5dy5hl4d - Time prevents events happening simultaneously and is the measure of change
@user-ky5dy5hl4d 01:54 AM GMT
All videos in your channel is very good. I think your way or explaining things make it so easy to understand
How i understand it, when two particles are entangled and you measure one and say, its spin is up then the other particle's spin is down.
That's the spin singlet state. This video uses the spin triplet state in its symmetry plane where the outcomes are always the same for the same measurements. See "Answering Mermin’s challenge with conservation per no preferred reference frame," Scientific Reports volume 10, Article number: 15771 (2020) or its more user-friendly version, "Einstein's missed opportunity to rid us of 'spooky actions at a distance'" on Science X (2020). Sorry, I can't supply the links or TH-cam will delete this post.
5:51 The Shanghai Maglev train doesn't use superconductors. It uses electromagnets through a Electromagnetic Suspension (EMS) system. The JR Chuo Shinkansen does use superconductors through the Electrodynamic system (EDS).
correct
At one time, in the beginning, the universe was at a single point. Today, no matter how far away or spread out the universe may appear, it still maintains the single point property. Think of a huge city, with buildings and homes throughout. Yet it's all still connected by a single basement that we cannot see.
Entanglement is a relationship mediated by conservation law, so no communication between entangled entities is required. It's essentially like the relationship between the momenta of two billiard balls which have interacted. The precise mechanics of quantum entanglement is unknown, but there's no reason to think that there's any sort of "spooky action at a distance" involved.
This is like in development of computer programs.. you have variable... lets call it static variable..and if some part of code changes that variable-it changes in every part of code where it's used.
I'll bet he regretted using the word spooky. He was a man of science, not hocus pocus.
Can these entanglement has anything to do with the planets supporting life in earth?
Love the description
Just went through a wonderful wormhole love the content ❤
I wonder if that "special communication" between twins could actually depend on entanglement between particles in their brains?
Good for Wi-Fi
Please make a biography about Ludwig Boltzmann.. I really want to know about him..
The most obvious problem with entanglement is that, by now, after billions of years, every particle in The universe would be entangled with every other particle in existence ( ? ) there would be no way to sort them out for any useful purpose ( ? ) !
Personally, I find quantum entanglement incredibly fascinating. The potential it could unlock. My biggest fantasy is that we could use it for Faster Than Light communication, each molecule acting as a bit. That's a lot of data.
And btw, that last thing about the photon-wave. From how I understand it, it's not really both. It's a proverbiality of where the individual photon will land, giving the illusion that it's a wave.
That's what I at least remember, and I could be wrong
We won't be able to do this. It would break causality.
@@JJs_playground Yes it would,so? It's just a theory,like the one that claimed the Earth was the center of the universe. And as a changed particle have the change spread along its past and future existence,that will be the funny part, we would be able to receive information sent by us from the future. That means you talking with yourelf without being crazy,hahaha
🤯 another great video
parallel universe 😍
Have you actually tested entanglement billions of light years apart? Have you tested it a light year apart? How are you so sure it works instantaneously?
Wow 😮
Amazing
HOW did Einstein come up with this?
Conciousness isn't created by brains. Conciousness is everywhere and everything.
Quantum entanglement is maybe the first physical evidence of this.
Good to see a Bengali person in Caltech..
This is interesting frr ❤
Rama Adhikari sounds like Elon musk
love this❤
doesnt this just show that the “superposition” concept is flawed. Its easy for “quantum entanglement “ to be explained if “superposition” isnt true
and this proves i was right gravity is from mass leakes down from higher frequencies higher dementions is why it is the weakest of the four forces all around and part of everything and is instantainous not the curviture of space nonsence like einstein said and tesla said he was wrong on everything i ll go with tesla .
PrOcess
STop Stop. This is an infection. Tread carefully... Bye
Sorry.. the balls will never be the same color after being veiwed. Never matching. Always oposite.. always.
That's not true. Using another metaphor, they can be correlated in opposite directions or in the same direction.
Ah yes the random TH-cam commenter knows more than physics professors lol
Um... what? Can you please give me any link to any published peer
reviewed experiment that shows that " spin " in entangled anything is ever the same...
I'm no Richard or anything but.....
Thank You for backing me up here.
"Entangled photons, nonlocality, and Bell inequalities in the undergraduate laboratory" D. Dehlinger and M.W. Mitchell, American Journal of Physics 70(9), 903. @@SecondChanceThrift-YucapiaCA
If you were paid to spout this crap, I would ask for my money back.
Please temper your language. Inanimate objects cannot defy anything. They just exhibit natural behavior. And quantum entanglement does not defy logic. It is merely inconsistent with our experience.
Quantum entanglement is neither the first nor only example of spooky action at a distance. The principle of least action, which governs classical dynamics, and the principle of least time, which governs geometrical optics, predate it. Nobody knows why they hold, either.
For that matter, the constant speed of light independent of the motion of the source is also inconsistent with our daily experience, yet the most sensitive possible measurements continue to confirm it. Case closed. You cannot fool nature.
Perceived? Abstract? Have you heard yourself....an Exiton?. Mother of God. Turn yourself off.
...and God doesn't exist...
Nobody says God's don't exist. Just that their ain't any evidence of such things. Hard to prove a negative.
@buildaboiworkshop explain ur model?
Explain you evidence that this God is male as you reference him and that there is any experimental evidence of any of what your claiming other than belife in ur faith?... (I'm not arguing ur belife I'm just asking for supporting evidence)
No body?@@SecondChanceThrift-YucapiaCA
You mean to say the evidence that is presented doesn't convince you. Of cause you don't mean there is no evidence.@@SecondChanceThrift-YucapiaCA
I would sugest to the people who work in the quantum research to try to study the retro-time effect,maybe the particles exists outside of our space-time dimensions and that causes manipulating a particle,the effect changes the particle along it's all past and future existence,including the moment when it was entangled,affecting the other entangled particles. It's just my dumb opinion,i don't have much knowledge in this domain, I'm not an educated person,i'm just an humble costruction worker.
Not to be offensive, but do you really understand the retro-time effect? If not, it makes no sense to suggest anything to experts in their field, as they certainly wouldn’t oversee anything of importance, that you „noticed“. I‘m no better in my understanding of this effect, but that comment makes no sense
@@herrroin6867 It makes no sense asking me if i understand something that i just described in my preious comment and it was not yet discovered by the human civilization, it's only an idea that could be true or wrong..... Also, my comment was not ment to be understood by everybody,but only by the people with a deep knowledge in the quantum field.
@@draculakickyourass you don’t have deep knowledge in this field, so it makes no sense to state rather random words linked together and hope it could help people who dedicate their lives to this. If you heard it somewhere, then the idea already was investigated. If it was yours, then it is unlikely that you understand everything about it and therefore is not useful.
@@herrroin6867 😄Your opinion about my knowlege have no logic,because you don't know me.If i work in construction doesn't make me an idiot,only a rebel who hates to sit in an office,but don't worry, i have a couple of friends who understood the idea,they are some of the most brilliant scientists wich designed the equipment at CERN. So, at your statement about not making sense only because YOU don't understand....i only can repeat: it wasn't ment to be understood by the large public,but by a small group of people wich you can count them on your fingers.
@@draculakickyourass Well I wouldn’t make these statements if you didn’t comment that you have next to no knowledge in that field and that your opinion is „dumb“, just as you said
So brilliant is working with the AI slop channels now. Glad I cancelled my subscription
We’re entangled 😮
Using different perspectives as an analogy for different measurements is actually spot on. Suppose Alice measures her particle vertically and the result is "up" (the other possible measurement outcome is "down"). She knows that if Bob measures his entangled-partner particle in the same vertical perspective, he will also find "up" (I'm using the spin triplet state here, as in this video). So, if Bob instead measures his particle in the horizontal perspective, Alice expects his result to be zero, neither "left" nor "right", since there is no side-to-side motion associated with up-and-down motion and Alice knows Bob's particle is vertically "up". Instead, for all the trials when Alice's result is "up", Bob's horizontal measurements produce equal numbers of "left" and "right" outcomes, which only *average* to zero side-to-side. The same obtains for all the trials when Alice's result is "down". So, Alice says Bob's measurements are horrible! His outcomes are as wrong as possible in each and every trial even if they do average to the correct outcome overall.
Bob, feeling insulted, replies, "Wait a minute. I know if Alice had measured her particle horizontally, then she would have gotten "right" when I got "right" and "left" when I got "left", so clearly her particle has no up-and-down motion at all. Therefore, *she* is the one who should be finding a zero result when she measures her particle vertically!" And, sure enough, for all the trials when Bob's result is "right", Alice's vertical measurements produce equal numbers of "up" and "down" outcomes, which only *average* to zero up-and-down. The same obtains for all the trials when Bob's result is "left". So, whose measurements are correct? The relativity principle says everyone's perspectives (reference frames) are equally valid for making measurements, so they're both correct!
This is totally analogous to the situation in special relativity when Alice's perspective (reference frame) differs from Bob's by virtue of their relative motion. In that case, Bob's measurements of Alice's meter sticks clearly show they are smaller than his. But, Alice's measurements of Bob's meter sticks clearly show they are smaller than hers. Again, whose measurements are correct? Again, the relativity principle says their measurements are equally valid, so they're both correct!
See "Einstein's Entanglement: Bell Inequalities, Relativity, and the Qubit" due out in June 2024 with Oxford UP for the details 🙂
❤❤❤🎉from London uk Veronica ngatia ❤❤❤❤❤
Actually the double slit experiment has an explanation. When the particle is getting "observed" (here observed doesn't mean by a human) it uses photons which have high energy this in-turn collapses the wave function of the particle being observed.
And that's why when not observed particles create a wave pattern and when observed act as individual particles.
Ya but the wave pattern develops with each particle on the detector.. after many many times it's sorta like a painting being painted..
The fact remains, it's not explained in any way. It's just a controlled expairement that leads to many amazing conclutions that baffle common sense...
So you said 1200 Km apart while displaying 12,000 km..... (@8:43) should this be blamed on quantum entanglement or just sloppy editing?
Ah my bad, good catch. It should say 1,200 km
And a 20% chance of being reasonable. What are you talking about? Listen to yourself. Lol. Nonsense.
Observing during the process means interacting...............
Lets create two entangled electrons A & B with A spin up (Au) and b down (Bd). Keep A in Earth and send B to ISS. Now reverse electron A to Ad. What B should do?
So the no conductor is the free will , but there's still some conductivity, otherwise our conduct would be ya ?
thank you for the amazing content!
Excellent!
Thanks!
E = mc2 is spooky too, for it doesn't spesify what ENERGY really is.
That would have been the case if he meant there are
c² = 90 000 000 000
smaller particles corresponding to every unit of mass.
Then it would, of course, be a LOCALIZED physical formula.
As it currently stands, it too is only a mathematical formula that experiments confirm ~ hence not different from the situation with ENTANGLEMENT or Newton's explanation of gravity.
That the effect is observable in the immediate surrounding of the event doesn't render it LOCAL.
E = mc² is not LOCALIZED either. Hence SPOOKY.
But then, so are also the concepts of charges and spin, for there is nothing PHYSICAL in any particle to differentiate those properties from MASS, the only property of a particle that can be visualized as corresponding to its PHYSICAL volume. Then again, different MASSES of different particles must be proportional to their volume, for even this concept to be considered fully PHYSICAL.
Hence, our current atom model too is SPOOKY in many ways.
Energy means heat
It proves the existance of the aether
How does one know if 2 particles are entangled? Is it by chance? Or is all particles entangled but we are just testing 2 particles.
They take a photon and split its power by 50% using a crystals "beem splitter"
@@SecondChanceThrift-YucapiaCA oh. So it's from the same particle itself?
@@mysticery yes in two places. It's actually common, we just don't fully understand it. It's said that once someone finds the answer, we will all giggle and say ohhh daaahh!!!
But it's been a like over 100 years and only deeper questions. Look into the quantum eraser after the double slit becomes understandable confussing and enjoy..
( on a personal note.. in ur head, draw a line from the scientific from the silly guess or the mystical) there is a line.. it can be adjusted thru experiment however the line is real.)