China vs The West: Does Trade War Spell End To Made-In-China Goods? | When Titans Clash 3 - Part 1/2

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 6K

  • @Callingnone
    @Callingnone 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +377

    I think this is a win win for everyone. I am glad to see Latin America develop its workforce and be an economic leader. Distribution of GDR and higher standard of living will solve so many problems relating to poverty, immigration and some more world wide.

    • @Alphasig336
      @Alphasig336 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Yep Guatemala can be developed to manufacture low tech construction. The cost is 1/3 the cost of Chinese labor and the Transportation cost is also 1/10 the cost. It would be vastly cheaper to produce in Latin America.

    • @sunnybeach4837
      @sunnybeach4837 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      We should have invested in the America's first and foremost after ww2. Then the entire hemisphere would have been solid. From there diversify throughout the world. A strong hemisphere would have been a stronger and safer world moving forward

    • @Rox888-vx3hv
      @Rox888-vx3hv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yet, it does not happen and China is already negotiating land purchases throughout Central America for its own projects@@Alphasig336

    • @Rox888-vx3hv
      @Rox888-vx3hv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The US has never allowed any country in the continent to develop and potentially become a threat. Desperates times for US to partner with Mexico now. It must be confident it can topple Mexico's government anytime like Venezuela and the rest of the latin countries@@sunnybeach4837

    • @curtis-dj5bp
      @curtis-dj5bp 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@sunnybeach4837 The US was busy destroying those countries. And for good reason.

  • @aircorgihui43
    @aircorgihui43 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +609

    It’s also good to diversifying productions not just china. At least other countries will be benefited in terms of manufacturing jobs.

    • @Liboch
      @Liboch 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      The most crucial is derisking our reserved currency. Nothing else more important than this single item.

    • @leowchaifah5264
      @leowchaifah5264 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Libochtebam8sMcezvbzti

    • @nusaibahibraheem8183
      @nusaibahibraheem8183 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Any country that succeeds like China will be targeted by the US. What they want is a monopoly. They thought China will forever be their cheap manufacturer. But China decided to build and develop their country and raise their people out of poverty. Good for them. Time is on China's side. There is a big world out there besides US and it's western proxies. China will work with the rest of the world.

    • @Mao-Digs-Escariote
      @Mao-Digs-Escariote 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

      avoiding monopoly of one country which they can use these to dictate the terms

    • @sihksahmir5635
      @sihksahmir5635 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      good like service diversified: google (androïd), windows, facebook, twitter, instagram, .....

  • @yyyz1032
    @yyyz1032 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +428

    Many branded clothing and shoes are manufactured in Vietnam, India, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico , Thailand and Argentina

    • @brawhite6157
      @brawhite6157 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      good

    • @_Wai_Wai_
      @_Wai_Wai_ 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Cotton and fabrics from Xinjiang

    • @SayNoToIdiots
      @SayNoToIdiots 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      So?

    • @herumesukuan
      @herumesukuan 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Those are heavy polluted industry

    • @magicer911
      @magicer911 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

      Do you still think of China as a country that only produces clothes and shoes?

  • @kkhalifah1019
    @kkhalifah1019 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    19:46 - US congresswoman Salazar's statement absolutely reeks of xenophobia, siege mentality at its worst. If China is deemed to be 'invading the US hemisphere' by merely strengthening trade with LatinAm, then how should the world perceive all the US military bases in Asia that surround China? The US can't be bothered to strengthen trade with its southern neighbours, but gets angry when China does it?
    Basically the West wanted to exploit China's cheap labour to manufacture their creature comforts for them at low cost. The problem started when China refused to play dumb and started turning that exploitation into an opportunity and a powerful competitive advantage within just a few decades while the West was happily bombing other nations back to the stone age. That's all it is, really.

    • @BonifacioArcega
      @BonifacioArcega 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      military and economy play different thing. If you flood sub-standard goods to the world, you are waging a trade war. If you are wreaking havoc and terror to peace-loving countries, you are waging a war. Without USA countering these phenomenon, the world will be trampled by evil minds. This is my personal opinion

    • @lance8080
      @lance8080 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      China makes crap 🇨🇳

    • @BaronEvola123
      @BaronEvola123 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're acting as if it wasn't part of the plan all along. Do you think it was an accident that every port, all around the world had a "Chinatown?" Every port, from Jamaica to Cuba to Singapore to Los Angeles to San Fransisco to Buenos Ares. The plan was always to have China take over world trade. It has been for 200 years.

  • @louieadam251
    @louieadam251 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +536

    Manufacturing should spreaded all over the world particularly in latin American nations so providing jobs for latin americans will help to ease illegal migration to US. Once the country is stable , peace and security follows.

    • @robbrand922
      @robbrand922 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      China is building a couple of EV manufacturing plants in Brazil. China will build a few car plants in Mexico if US allows.

    • @brian.z6592
      @brian.z6592 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +84

      America as the most powerful neighbor of Latin America, they should've do what you said to develop Latin America decades ago. But now, it's China doing this job for America.

    • @TacticalMayo
      @TacticalMayo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@brian.z6592not for much longer.

    • @dilithsanthush267
      @dilithsanthush267 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      economy should no be based on which countries gets a good life and which don't it should be based of profit

    • @EAL007
      @EAL007 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Environmental regulations won't allow the manufacture of many products in developed countries.. They'll pretty much prefer a third world country destroy its flora and fauna for that iphone or that EV car.

  • @FMCandidate
    @FMCandidate 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +78

    Di-vorce is what we are calling for. Breaking up is hard to do.

    • @BenhurBaguio
      @BenhurBaguio 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @林琪拉雅
      @林琪拉雅 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Breaking up is easy when there are no conflicts of interest

  • @margaretcaine4219
    @margaretcaine4219 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    If China is collapsing with 5% growth, where does that leave the USA, Germany, the UK?

    • @KoperPine
      @KoperPine 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Well Said!

    • @marksmanships
      @marksmanships 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I wouldn't trust any report from the CCP but take it would a huge grain of salt. They have always fudge their numbers to whatever narrative they want to portray. Here's another YT video about that 5% GDP. China's propaganda has swayed many sheep around the world. th-cam.com/video/w1u3V7siiGc/w-d-xo.html

    • @99.5RT
      @99.5RT 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Economic effects will not manifest immediately. Will see it over the medium/long term.

    • @Lafly84
      @Lafly84 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      With a billion less mouths to fill every day.

    • @Lu_90s
      @Lu_90s 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Lafly84more like a billion more hands and brains

  • @cassandraknight8804
    @cassandraknight8804 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    So interesting… well reported and good work to all ❤

  • @bmanpura
    @bmanpura 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    The most surprising part of this video was that the mention of 2007. 2007 was the year Chinese companies realized they need to move out of China. That was.. almost 20 years ago.
    Insanely far timeframe, I wonder what goes through their minds when they decided to go through with the decision.
    Also goes to show that we can't really predict the future, but we can look into the past and learn a bit more about ourselves.

    • @NeidlichesSchwert
      @NeidlichesSchwert 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was in China then. This debate was very much happening then.

  • @caver38
    @caver38 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +123

    This is nothing new , manufacturers have always been choosing the cheapest country for their factories , now China like the developed world is too expensive and the manufacturers are always looking for maximum profit .

    • @calvinwong365
      @calvinwong365 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      USA and Canada tried slave the Chinese when Chinese all immigrated to Americans and western world as well. A lot of Chinese people adapted and adjusted. This is what happens when countries are too lazy and all they do is party..etc. remember china during 1950s to 1970s were poor as hell. A lot of places didn't even have toilets or air conditioning. Everyone shat in holes. Americans always wanted the Chinese to be slaves cause of their work ethics and their drive for money. The times have changed now. I'm Chinese myself and born in Canada. I'll side with Canada or course but there times Canada just a complete pussy of a country. This country basically slaved to the Americans as well. How the hell do we not manufacturer and bottle our own water is messed up

    • @larrysmith2123
      @larrysmith2123 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But China is not developed it's a poor third world

    • @Al-oe8ib
      @Al-oe8ib 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You can pretend?

    • @larrysmith2123
      @larrysmith2123 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China is not developed what a joke LOL. I know Singapore's wet dream is to have China century ain't gonna happen dear.

    • @tonystank2680
      @tonystank2680 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What happens when several decades into the future , all countries become rich? Do these manufacturers just reduce their profit?

  • @austen98
    @austen98 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +162

    The main takeaway is that companies are just doing what's best for their business given what's been going on in recent times. This "diversification", whether China likes it or not, is important to those companies. Part of the problem, to a large extent, is China itself and while the economics of such a move is secondary. China does understand this even if it doesn't like it.

    • @nevilenobody606
      @nevilenobody606 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      Absolutely. The Chinese government has only itself to blame for increasing the political risk for companies doing business there.

    • @mizanrahman5194
      @mizanrahman5194 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Businesses are moving elsewhere because China is becoming expensive and competitive. No more cheap labour and hungry markets for foreign companies to make tons of profits. China has moved up the value chain. Labour intensive productions due to high labour costs are moving to low cost countries like India, Vietnam, Bangladesh etc. Add to it local companies entering market with products of equal if not better quality. Businesses are just rationalising their strategies in order to make profit and stay afloat. That's how businesses work, thrive and help develop poorer countries directly/indirectly.

    • @bl5608
      @bl5608 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Companies moving out of china benefits neighboring developing countries. Today china is like 1980 /1990 US. Outsourcing jobs to china while US keeps Silicon valley and Wall Street. China keeping high technology innovative industries and china banking while outsourcing low end manufacturers and assembly lines jobs.
      China main priority is no longer making money rather its developing itself socially. Chinese middle class wants blue sky and better social infrastructures.
      China been investing heavily with Asean and most likely jobs will be outsource to neighboring countries.
      China wins , developing countries wins , consumers wins. It's a triple win

    • @kieungan2706
      @kieungan2706 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agreed with all above. Also remember when a manufacturing shift to a different country (like Japan/Germany in the 50, Singapore/HK in the 70 and China in the 80) it also emerged into that country’s culture. There’s a reason why people like products made in Japan v those made in China. Understand there’s quality control within those big manufacturers but the culture that shaped work ethic imbedded so deep in each country. To achieve high quality, maximize revenue and minimize cost, peole will go through extent. It explained why there were sweat shops, child labor, drainage of natural resources, large gap of lower class and higher class that you see in one manufacturing country but not the others

    • @deezeed2817
      @deezeed2817 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nevilenobody606 You are buying into American propaganda again and again and again. It is NOT China that increased political risk, It is the U.S led west that initiated attacks. The 2 countries can never co-exist in the same manner because Chinese investments compete with U.S investments. Just crack open Lenin's theory on imperialism. The same conditions that led to the other world wars are happening again. You cannot NEVER have a universal equilibrium where everyone just gets along. That's NOT how capitalism works. It is an unequal system that relies on exploitation, imperialism and hegemony. The fact that you cannot recognise this tells me that years of neoliberal propaganda and brainwashing has been successful

  • @Sk-po9dx
    @Sk-po9dx 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    I like the mentality of China. Chinese are hard working, educated people, advance High technologies, building advance infrastructure, roads, railways and investing abroad also helps the other countries in employment and economy globally.
    There may be some negative impact but on the bright side Chinese produced cheaper affordable products and also alternative to some European & American products which is highly expensive

    • @johngeers4023
      @johngeers4023 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The West is no innocent.. but China? Their products, like a Walmart (which incidentally is filled with Chinese products) are usually inferior, underpriced but usually derived by cuts in safety and quality processes, or are from relaxed or non-existent worker protections everywhere. It also feeds the communist party in the end which is bent on "defeating the west" and dominating the world even though they may pretend otherwise. The world would include anything not China.. so you as well. Like a Walmart, they ruin/disrupt regular economies and use investment colonialism. Glossing over the "there may be some negative impact" negates workers rights, pushing of substandard products, corporate espionage, copyright theft, and their own protectionism as their government is so deeply ingrained into their corporations. I could go on but simply put. China is no greater alternative unless you are just about being dependent on "cheap" stuff like a Walmart shopper. As a small developing nation, I would take any "unencumbered" grants and assistance I could. I would then invest in my own as best I could IE: Africa supporting Africa.. unless I wanted to be beholden to the West or China in the long term.

    • @cratecruncher4974
      @cratecruncher4974 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "I for one welcome our new overlords."😄

    • @laifamily7804
      @laifamily7804 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cratecruncher4974 the old overlords are old white boomers white supermacist colonizers...better to go with ppl who just want the money and doesn't have the colonizer dna

    • @hotpink432008
      @hotpink432008 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If they are educated, how come they act like animals without manners in other countries, like they own it. They have no manners and right conduct. Sooo uneducated

    • @BonifacioArcega
      @BonifacioArcega 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ... because these people grown up under different situations unlike Democratic countries where freedom abounds

  • @BangaloreAviation
    @BangaloreAviation 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    When was this episode broadcast? It was uploaded 5 days ago but the narrative refers to 2022 in a sort of future tense.

    • @andrewwatson1690
      @andrewwatson1690 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      There's a date 29/9/2023 @20 mins, so it can't be that old.
      And yes, I put the date in the correct order 😂

  • @josephsirambara
    @josephsirambara 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +94

    Manufacturering is changing in China because of rise in cost of production, cheap manufacturing has to be transferred to other countries where the income is low and has a large youthful unemployment population

    • @kaalidas410
      @kaalidas410 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      India right???

    • @sajadhussain6153
      @sajadhussain6153 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You are correct cost of living has gone up last 10 years and continues going up

    • @SPECIALTRADER1
      @SPECIALTRADER1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol

    • @paultan5065
      @paultan5065 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      It is not that simple, China is highly skilled, Many apple components left China for India on America's behest, many of them suffer and went back because of very poor quality output.

    • @ヘスリングマイク-j2i
      @ヘスリングマイク-j2i 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@paultan5065 China used to be highly skilled, back when they had the silk, poecelain and gun powder market to themselves and such.
      Now they are just "crafty". 孔子 has been turning in his grave for the past 75 years.

  • @williammore558
    @williammore558 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    China growth was phenomenal because FDI went there due to the low cost and expected returns on investment. In the last 2 decades, manpower costs had gone up ten fold and China is no longer cheap plus interference from government is of concern. Plenty are leaving for Vietnam, Bangladesh, India, etc. It will be interesting to see how China will fare in the next few years.

    • @KJ_2020
      @KJ_2020 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Not just FDI but also the work ethic of the Chinese people, like the Japanese before them. It makes for a seamless transition in production when all the cogs in the process are willing and able. I'm not convinced that India can replace China even if they have the numbers to do so, it is so fragmented structurally and as a society and culture I don't think they are willing or able. If they were, and if there was trust in that process, it would have happened long ago - before China even.

    • @sahilrajput5746
      @sahilrajput5746 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​​@@KJ_2020India from 2014 to 2023 got 596 billion dollars FDI
      That says a lot
      , Just wait
      50 Metro,
      40000 km expressway
      Bullet train corridors with 512 km routes
      And made in india hyperloop
      100 airport
      Redevelopment of ports
      and redevelopment of 1300 + railway station
      All these projects i mentioned are under construction

    • @sahilrajput5746
      @sahilrajput5746 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​​@@KJ_2020India is fastest growing economy soon by 2026 will be third largest economy,
      We doing space program
      We are making indigenous weapons
      Actually our real journey started from 2014 when Modi government came in power
      , That's why we are second largest phone manufacturer and Third largest auto manufacturers
      and soon semiconductor, solar module , IT hardware, ev and its components and its battery
      Will be manufactured by india

    • @jbqu3142
      @jbqu3142 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sahilrajput5746 well then, if India is so marvelous, how come you don’t cure your lepers. How come your dictator Modi pushes Muslims aside of society? How come you let your democracy becoming a Modi dictature?

    • @jizifeng
      @jizifeng 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      China economics is slow down,but 5%+ grow is still much better than US or Europe.China is monopoly in new eneerge revolution:EV cars,solar board,battery,,in 10 years no doubt China pass USA to be No1/
      low level industry out of China and new high level industry grow up.

  • @danielwong2333
    @danielwong2333 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

    Same goes to derisking dollars but not decoupling the dollars, thats how the world is moving ahead.

    • @awjames1121
      @awjames1121 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If usa not dare assure and guarantee its overprinted dollars trustworthy anymore ,?. Sure all nations will ditch usa dollars and don't trade in unguarantee usa overprinted dollars anymore now,?..
      Who wants unguarantee and overprinted usa dollars,,?..

    • @akeshshi9137
      @akeshshi9137 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No it's not, USD in the best shape ever since. Only silly countries would let go of their USD reserves.

  • @myrnagutierrez6486
    @myrnagutierrez6486 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    Though trade war seemed ended, China is self sufficient they will survive. What i fear most is my country unprepared of everything.

    • @JAM661
      @JAM661 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Self sufficient that's funny. China need to import 70% of there food. The only fossil fuel they have a lot of is coal which is causing huge air pollution problems. Then 90% of there natural water sources are to contaminated from pesticides and other chemicals and basically too toxic to use for any human use. 50% of China was living in proverty even before Covid happemed. The USA unemployment at it highest was 30% during the depression. Well China unemployment is now recorded to be like 50%. Meanwhile the whole system is so corrupt. You have banks stealing people money. You have people who bought home that they have to make payment on for 30 years but were never finished or so badly built they fell down, but the people still have to pay for the loan. These people have no legal recourse either. In fact the police do nothing but arrest people the governmemt has a issue with. So your child being kidnapped is not the police comcern and the billion cameras they have were not working that day.

    • @johnmc2514
      @johnmc2514 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China has massive poverty rates. How will these people survive?

    • @aprilmeowmeow
      @aprilmeowmeow 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I wish you peace, wherever you are.

    • @jalifritz8033
      @jalifritz8033 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They aren’t? They can’t produce key technologies like semiconductors, are dependent on coal for electricity and China doesn’t produce enough food for its people.

    • @ClaudioCarrera-j6o
      @ClaudioCarrera-j6o 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its just getting started, adn china will not survive, how is the housing and stock market? 75% of the world does not like china, to put it mildly.

  • @cindylou7017
    @cindylou7017 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    This is hands down one of the most interesting documentaries I’ve seen in a while! Very honest and looking at things from various perspectives, great journalism!

    • @etoiledenoundi
      @etoiledenoundi หลายเดือนก่อน

      'Great' journalism, because it is talking about how America is could go on another spree to enslave the world? So you really think your US dollar will stand forever to 'control' all countries on the planet to bend to your whims? You had better think again, and hard this time! Everybody knows that's your most potent weapon. The rest of the world will de-risk from your dollar, that should be obvious to you! Maybe you are not noticing that they are already making a wide berth to your IOYs that you call Treasury Bonds!

  • @Bodie-Boy
    @Bodie-Boy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +89

    When you have to tariff and ban your competitors products cause they're better and cheaper, you've already lost.

    • @bobmorane4926
      @bobmorane4926 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      It's a self defeating strategy. That's why China shouldn't fight it too hard when your opponent is shooting himself in the foot. Case in point, US banned all Chinese farming equipment years ago. Today, many of the farmers from the global South countries who bought Chinese farming equipment are much more competitive than their Western counterparts. They produce more, can keep their purchase costs and maintenance costs low as opposed to a Deere or Caterpillar purchase. I think the same thing might happen with EVS. Western consumers will be fleeced while Global South consumers will finally get a chance to up their standard of living by getting access to better and cheaper Chinese products.

    • @paulskywarrior6943
      @paulskywarrior6943 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      no its a winning strategy

    • @bobmorane4926
      @bobmorane4926 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@paulskywarrior6943 How ? By allowing your farmers to go bankrupt ? By forcing them to buy expensive and inferior equipment, they get fleeced in the long term Bcos there's no competition, John Deere and Caterpillar can jack their prices with almost no improvement. Have you heard of Boeing ? No competition and they control everything bcos they know the customers are stuck with them. They hv no incentive to produce competitive and safe products. Same scenario happening to Evs . The Murican consumers getting fleeced bcos no competition is allowed.

    • @lenocon6555
      @lenocon6555 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      How could u say u made better product which is not China produce low quality product

    • @Amidat
      @Amidat 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@lenocon6555 yeah sure like those expensive apple phones and tesla cars right?

  • @antonywooster6783
    @antonywooster6783 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Where's the evidence for "Forced labour in Xinjiang"? The UN sent a "Rapporteur" to Xinjiang to report on this subject. When she came back she made a report and the US blocked its publication!

    • @awjames1121
      @awjames1121 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe usa afraid , if published will disgrace usa as a telling lies nation??. Usa ban it,,???...

    • @awjames1121
      @awjames1121 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And because of usa ban her,?. She then resigned?????...

    • @granttaylor4762
      @granttaylor4762 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your English is veyyy verrrry good comrad

  • @5t0ryte11er
    @5t0ryte11er 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    China will develop its 1.4B population markets. People are gradually replacing foreign brands with local brands. Although decoupling hurts the employments in China but it also helps China to fix its weaknesses. It has started to develop what they do not have in the past, redirect labours to those areas, and gradually replacing foreign brands. It is not a win-lose game but this is just a norm. The first sentence in romance of three kingdoms said the world will be deivided after together for a long period, and vice versa. Almost all Chinese know about this sentence, therefore it is not a surprise for Chinese.

    • @nevilenobody606
      @nevilenobody606 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Sorry ,the weaknesses will not be fixed as long as the central government does not take the hard decisions to reform the economy.

    • @craig3949
      @craig3949 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What? Are you a China lover? They threatened the world! Taiwan, Hong Kong, Tibet, your a 🤡

    • @Trgn
      @Trgn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That was exactly the case of the American economy for decades. It's a huge self consumption economy, not so much export oriented

    • @tonysu8860
      @tonysu8860 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Can't agree.
      You ignore the fundamental basis of trade which is the idea that every human and community has different skills, capabilities and abilities. One person can do something better than another and so humans have found that a community is far more productive and profitable for everyone than if every person in that community selfishly tried to do everything by himself. Doing things all by oneself may be possible but is hardly ever the most beneficial path forward, and this principle has been proven over and over again through history.

    • @wamnicho
      @wamnicho 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Trgn they export dollars

  • @russianprincess3673
    @russianprincess3673 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    China is simply changing not imploding ❤️

    • @manchurian-pw8lj
      @manchurian-pw8lj 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Those ashes and embers are just confetti and silly spray 🥰🥰🥰

    • @patrickt49
      @patrickt49 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Numbers say otherwise. At least ones that aren't doctored or manipulated by the CCP.

  • @deusx.machinaanime.3072
    @deusx.machinaanime.3072 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    7:32 De-risking is good strategy so that a solid dependency on one country will no longer exist. This is good governance.

    • @twowheelsandcroissant
      @twowheelsandcroissant 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      like how countries shouldn't depend on USD as reserve currency when it is being weaponised against countries that go against its will

    • @deusx.machinaanime.3072
      @deusx.machinaanime.3072 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@twowheelsandcroissant Do you even know what you are saying?
      If the most stable currency in the world is the USD, then whose fault is that? Blame your own country for not doing well economically.
      USA certainly do not need to apologize for that.
      Besides, other countries do not need to have the US currency as their reserve currency. They can stockpile Euros if they want to. Stockpile Chinese Huan if you want but the Chinese currency has decreased in value in the last 24 years.
      Your logic does not make sense - blaming the US for other nation’s economic mis-management and idiosyncrasies.
      Make your currency reserved as Bitcoin for all we care.

    • @samuelememanka8975
      @samuelememanka8975 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      De-Risking sounds good to you because CHINA was smart enough as not fell into U.S trap as Japan with Plaza Accord.

  • @kennethsnyder9236
    @kennethsnyder9236 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Fair trade is fair play for all parties involved but sadly it doesn’t work out that way for all sides.

    • @chongkt6469
      @chongkt6469 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Chinese efficiency is definitely higher than the US, you can flame me for that if you want. They can build a road in two months which would take two years in the West. Their currency is one sixth that of the US. Even if they sell to the US at very good margins it would still win hand down against goods produced in the US in terms of price and you call that dumping. So whose fault is it?

    • @tonysu8860
      @tonysu8860 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Fair trade doesn't always mean balanced trade.
      In fact,, rarely do 2 trading partners trade equally. Usually a 3rd party or more has to be involved to maybe balance the trade. But, trade imbalances aren't necessarily bad,. Depends on the circumstances. If one trading partner benefits more than others, is it the fault of the lesser side not to produce enough of what the other wants?

    • @Deco_2k
      @Deco_2k 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@chongkt6469 Efficiency is jsut one thing though, but what about durability and reliability cause to me it seem like efficiency is the only everybody pay for ..

  • @eliahuweinstein
    @eliahuweinstein 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    The TEMU "cookie" on my computer was almost 1MB.

    • @JANTHONYPerez
      @JANTHONYPerez 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Delete it. Never support, trust, buy from China

    • @nigellei8591
      @nigellei8591 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      So, you shop at temu a lot?

    • @unknownname231
      @unknownname231 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nigellei8591 That is not how "cookie" works

  • @kentriat2426
    @kentriat2426 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Given almost half the factories in China are owned or part owned by companies in western countries there is little chance of manufacturing in China to stop.
    Western companies cannot afford to cover the write off costs of leaving China. The existing EPA guidelines within western nations are too strict to allow rebuilding of new operation on-sure. Other eastern nations do not have the infrastructure or trained employees.

    • @Dept246
      @Dept246 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The factories in China are owned by the Chinese. They only manufacture for western companies. For example the iPhone is assembled in China but Apple does not own the factory.

  • @martintapia9374
    @martintapia9374 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Superb Documentary on China vs Western World 👏👏👏

    • @funpau7549
      @funpau7549 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There should have never been China vs the West. Everyone would be happy for them like we are for Germany, Japan, Korea, Hong Kong, etc. Only if they weren’t showing evil intentions globally. Most countries that became developed become more civilized and environmentally friendly, yet China is going backwards.

  • @pjacobsen1000
    @pjacobsen1000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    It's still early days in this whole de-risking/de-coupling process. It is a process that will continue to develop over the next 10 years until it reaches a new equilibrium. China will continue to have a piece of the pie, but it's dream of owning the whole pie will probably not come true.

    • @KBellate
      @KBellate 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      It’s pretty much impossible to decouple from China even in 10 years time. It will definitely make China less competitive, but it will also hurt US consumers at the same time. If the US banned import from China, Chinese companies will just ship it to Vietnam, Latin America and export those products there to the US. That’s what they did, when Trump imposed the tariffs. People are buying the same products from China, but at a higher cost because of routing goods. Another example would be Europe banning imports of Russian oil because of the Ukraine war. Russia sold them to India, and India were selling them to Europe.

    • @pjacobsen1000
      @pjacobsen1000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@KBellate That's why there will be no complete decoupling, only a movement of some production to other countries. This is already happening, of course. China will continue to produce some products for some countries.

    • @happymelon7129
      @happymelon7129 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China never want the the whole pie .
      China Continuously express follow UN , but U$A want other follow its rules.

    • @ZLL668
      @ZLL668 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Daydreaming...to become a manufacture powerhouse, you need infrastructures, easy access to land and energy, well educated high quality work force and lastly the sheer scale....other countries can take away some manufacture jobs, but no one can replace China.

    • @pjacobsen1000
      @pjacobsen1000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@ZLL668 As if the entire west wasn't once the world's industrial powerhouse. We've been there, we invented the whole thing. Other countries can do it, too, not just China. You're not that unique (even though you are very, very big).

  • @helxsz
    @helxsz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    it doesn't matter it is de-risking or de-coupling in the face of geo-politics, the trade war that US imposed on China and tech sanction over chinese companies had long started in Trump administration, and continue to escalate over time, because the western countries view the rise of southern countries represented by China as the next challenger

    • @happymelon7129
      @happymelon7129 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The real agenda ......
      ---------------------------------
      The US Foreign Policy to keep Asia poor and divided as stated in a top-secret U.S. Foreign Policy document written 76 years ago is still in force.
      February 24, 1948, Declassified U.S. Foreign Policy:
      Furthermore, we have about 50% of the world’s wealth but only 6.3% of its population. This disparity is particularly great as between ourselves and the peoples of Asia. In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security. ... that Japan and the Philippines will be found to be the corner-stones of such a Pacific security system and that if we can contrive to retain effective control over these areas there can be no serious threat to our security from the East within our time.
      Taiwan was added to the Pacific security system after Chiang's army retreated to the island of Taiwan in 1949. South Korea was added after the Korean War in 1953. The attempt with Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia was abandoned in 1975.

  • @briancorrigan5350
    @briancorrigan5350 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    In the pursuit of lightness and strength, you also have the use of exotic alloys of steel classified as High Strength and Ultra High Strength (HSS & UHSS). Great for adding strength with less weight, they cannot be repaired like mild steel. Pulling and welding chassis legs is no longer feasible. Removal and replacement of the entire UHSS assembly is the only option.

  • @HTeo-og1lg
    @HTeo-og1lg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    In the Anglo-Saxon media jargon, some benign-sounding synonyms for geo-strategic plans :
    (1) De-risking/de-coupling = breaking the existing supply chains
    (2) like-minded = those compliant to our Alliance's economic and military interests
    (3) free indo-Pacific = "containment of China" architecture
    (4) their business "invaded" our hemisphere = they are doing what our businesses were/are doing in Asia
    (5) they stole our IP = they have learnt how to do what we did, and not content to remain as cheap laborers to us.

    • @Wayne-tb8tk
      @Wayne-tb8tk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Seems a lot like a narcissistic slant on reality!!

  • @sonnyng9701
    @sonnyng9701 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Ursula: "we have not forgotten what China did to our solar industry (when Germany was a global leader but now with just 3% global share of solar cell manufacturing?)," German rail manufacturing, steel and other vital industries, now threatening the continent's crown jewel: auto and in particular EVs. And what we the EU or Germany done to shore up its sagging EV industry during the past ten years when solar was stolen from German firms: NOTHING! With solar cells as a case in point, Chinese manufacturers soon flood global markets with cheap, state subsidized cells as a practice (even if this leads to overcapacity which is often the case) after acquiring the know-hows from Western companies especially German eager to cash in on the country's massive pool of consumers. This drives out their foreign competitors (German and American especially). Chinese companies are starting to deploy the same approach with EVs (with VW as one of the principal auto consultants to Chinese auto firms) and in the near future legacy chips (easy to produce en mass and not the most advanced as those restricted by the US but present in every items like electronics, cars, etc. It's rather ironic and pathetic that, after willingly and legally transferring their advanced German auto manufacturing know-hows to Chinese firms like Geely, BYD and Nio, these same German firms and their government via the EU start to scrutinize the same Chinese autos--when it's too late, now that European auto companies have been displaced in market share and green technologies such as EVs!

    • @feihongwong2524
      @feihongwong2524 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are completely out of your mind, not China to blame, should blame on your own governments, because any government follow the US lead, will go to ground.

    • @simonj5128
      @simonj5128 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      EU is still living in last century. What technologies nowdays the EU are advanced than China? China leads 37 in 43 technologies than all western countries.

    • @robman2095
      @robman2095 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They did the same with Huawei and network communications technology

    • @John-hl2ir
      @John-hl2ir 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      BYD's battery technology is developed by itself, stop your delusions.
      The classic Western saying is: stealing technology

    • @reptilexcq2
      @reptilexcq2 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Western world can not win against China when it comes to manufacturing cheap products. Now, the cheap products are also high quality? It's game over! So, my suggestion to Europe and America: Give it up on the manufacture sectors and look toward service sectors lol. I think America have done just that for the past decade lol.

  • @robroisneakers
    @robroisneakers 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    This setback is just temporary for China. China has almost had the blueprint of the what world needs that most of the other countries haven't. The Raw materials might be the challenging part. But buyers still looking for the most affordable in the market.

    • @NewmaticKe
      @NewmaticKe 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I lived and work in China the past 24 years. The economy has fallen off the cliff and there's no recovery from this

    • @JAM661
      @JAM661 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well China is not the most affordable in the market. Part of the problem as the people get better educated they want higher wages. China has priced themselves out of the market, but companies cannot run in a environment where the governmemt can just steal your companies money and arrest your employees and accuse them as spys over nothing. Also most of these people who order directly from China never see there products.

    • @anselbaron6848
      @anselbaron6848 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@NewmaticKe ???🤣

    • @sitarampradhan8488
      @sitarampradhan8488 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How you assume that only China had blueprint and other countries don't have. Get well soon. 🤡🤡🤡🤡

  • @themiddlekingdom9121
    @themiddlekingdom9121 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Not the end of made-in-China goods, but China is moving up the value chains products.

    • @patrickt49
      @patrickt49 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How?

  • @dobz746
    @dobz746 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Its not that China’s economy is going under but the reason why th a number of countries and the US are derisking is that China is militarizing and has been bullying a number of countries in regards to conflict of territories. Aside from that they do human rights labor violations in a number of factories where it is bad PR for brands.

  • @whoamigodknows9020
    @whoamigodknows9020 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Regardless people will still buy from Temu, Shein etc

    • @venomdank965
      @venomdank965 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not true I havent bought there and always hated supporting anything made in china since the 90s.. I always hated their quality... havent even got a iphone that was made in china. Apple sell outs

    • @vomitthunder
      @vomitthunder 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      because people are care wayyy less about human live anymore

  • @leexingha
    @leexingha 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

    i think the main reason why US didnt ASAP go into green tech despite being technology ahead is due to US' abundance access to oil

    • @Herewatching
      @Herewatching 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Not just the petroleum business, the lacking supply chain of green tech (solar panels, battery tech, infrastructure etc.) Once we lost the manufacturer capabilities, it's game over

    • @joshlewis575
      @joshlewis575 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It doesn't matter what anyone does when the ccp keeps burning more coal then the rest of the world combined

    • @DineshTwanabasu
      @DineshTwanabasu 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Petro $$$

    • @TL-fe9si
      @TL-fe9si 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Old money from these big petro-business families is definitely slowing down the US green transition

    • @ke2akun544
      @ke2akun544 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@TL-fe9siif they dont have more oil they will move to green energy 😂

  • @alanc6416
    @alanc6416 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    12:21 a very precise and fair assessment of the situation.

    • @retsamyar
      @retsamyar 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      really fair... im sure they mention the fact that the data from official ccp sources is extremely untrustworthy and known to be made up. Im sure they factor that into their assessment, right?

  • @funpau7549
    @funpau7549 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    US pay the Chinese for goods, who in turn, open factories in Mexico, Africa, etc. Why didn’t US just pay Mexico, etc. and cut out the middleman?

  • @TomNook.
    @TomNook. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +96

    I'd just like to complement the editors on the choice of music throughout this video. Made a very boring political video very dramatic and on edge!

  • @DarkVader-jj4dt
    @DarkVader-jj4dt 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    The people who says the west is decoupling from China are naive and have no good idea how capitalism really works. Near shoring countries import most of their raw materials from China anyway so has little effect on China in the long run. Mexico, India, Vietnam and similar countries all import most of their raw materials from China.

    • @TheDexsword
      @TheDexsword 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep, sadly thats the truth. Western countries love to spout wanting to decouple from china but their own capitalism interest wont do with long term profit in mind but still thinking short term that makes the process imperfect from the start.
      Greed above all sadly.

    • @garychen2048
      @garychen2048 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@TheDexswordGreed can be the solution, too. People in India and Maxico will see the profit from upper steam industries and start new businesses. Nobody is irreplaceable.

    • @comchadelalora
      @comchadelalora 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I think you are wrong. China is the big consumer of raw materials which it needs desperately for its industry and its own survival.

    • @nissanberondo7913
      @nissanberondo7913 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      You are wrong china importing material from diffirent country like brazil,philippines like nickel,iron ore oil and more.

    • @雅君墨客-i9z
      @雅君墨客-i9z 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@nissanberondo7913中国本身也生产何况提炼和提取技术加工技术冶炼都是在中国然后出口,还有菲律宾不是一个资源国进口最初原材料是除了中国自己本土生产,还有从俄罗斯巴西智利澳大利亚等国进口在中国提炼冶炼加工然后在中国制造或者出口给其他国家制造。😂

  • @wrldtrvlr4vr
    @wrldtrvlr4vr 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    About time we see more Made in America products

    • @ianbardon8581
      @ianbardon8581 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Too expensive, too late it's gone.

  • @josemaciel232
    @josemaciel232 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    The early bird gets the worm,lots of hard work and willingness to do it paid off

  • @nataliehozjan9103
    @nataliehozjan9103 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Very good program

  • @liarliar3412
    @liarliar3412 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    US 2023 trade deficits with China could shrink a bit due to reduced imports.
    Meanwhile Mexico's exports to US boomed. China also strikes while the iron is hot -nearshoring

    • @folag
      @folag 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Yup, Mexico's exports to the US boomed, namely Fentanyl.

    • @liarliar3412
      @liarliar3412 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@folag Your head is in the wrong place.

    • @willengel2458
      @willengel2458 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      China offshored some of its factories to Viet-Nam and Mexico, so there are marked increase of exports to US from these two countries.

    • @geektechpow4537
      @geektechpow4537 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Problem is not that Mexico is exporting more to US.. the problem is that the US is exporting far less to China. if we don't considered weapon, US balance export are negative since 2022. which is really bad. While China export surplus 800 billion USD for 2023.

    • @Serolfarim1
      @Serolfarim1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@geektechpow4537 You have link that it is $800B? Even if it is true for every dollar value America imports from China $.55 already went to U.S workers. For example high end Nike shoes imported from China already have u.s made materials. U.S consider every item bought from abroad as import even if it has u.s made part.

  • @CindySorenson-r4m
    @CindySorenson-r4m 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Anyone can make the honest claim that no data is being used to subvert your national security up until the point AI does it for them in a snap of the finger.

    • @tonysu8860
      @tonysu8860 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      AI is only the newest tool in the toolbox of humankind.
      Although the better tool is important, building a better house still requires a better carpenter to wield the same hammer.
      Although ti's hard to suggest China or the US might be more advanced developing different types of AI,, as an American I'm not particularly worried, onl.y watchful. American society still has a multitude of advantages of China so is by far the better carpenter.

  • @jjanggu1515
    @jjanggu1515 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Quality has gone down a lot… I noticed new products feel lighter and less durable

    • @richardseeto1182
      @richardseeto1182 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That's bullshit...

    • @jjanggu1515
      @jjanggu1515 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@richardseeto1182 think about how carefully you have to grab and use stuff nowadays so it doesn’t break

  • @Azrael1BC
    @Azrael1BC 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    It's all about the money,who can make the most from least.

    • @MetaView7
      @MetaView7 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly.

    • @aprilmeowmeow
      @aprilmeowmeow 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      where has the humanity from these leaders (ALL of them!) gone? we have one planet people...and one life. This is all so disheartening, but I know there are people all over the world who feel the same way.
      I wish all the cruel leaders and billionaires would take their money to space and just stay there with it forever.

    • @ianbardon8581
      @ianbardon8581 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh yes , just look at big pharma

  • @oldmusickillsnew
    @oldmusickillsnew 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Quality, or rather the lack of, will doom Chinese manufacturing. Personally I will pay 20x more for something not made in China and I'm always money ahead.

    • @kennyyap9745
      @kennyyap9745 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      PLEASE SHOW PHOTOS TO PROOF YR STAND IDIOT LOSERS

    • @daisysee2935
      @daisysee2935 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      right, you hit it!
      cheaper but innovation? not true! stainless steel made in china here is rusting!

    • @nechoji
      @nechoji 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're really ready to buy a beginner's iPhone for $20,000, do you know what that means?
      Inflation of 20 times that amount is enough to collapse many countries around the world.
      Without China's cheap goods, at the Fed's rate of money printing, many countries around the world will soon erupt into economic crises, civil unrest and marches, and when the country collapses, the U.S. capitalists will be able to take control of the lifeblood of these countries.
      Round after round of interest rate hikes on the U.S. dollar have resulted in

  • @patsmith2571
    @patsmith2571 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Each nation should build it's own products.
    Otherwise it's pitting the working class of one country against another. Unfair to labor.

    • @herumesukuan
      @herumesukuan 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Talking about division of labour and division of efficient resource utilization

    • @ianbardon8581
      @ianbardon8581 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not possible

  • @g600f700
    @g600f700 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    I agree each nation is different, the problem is if they agree on a contract and then violate/dis-honor the terms/conditions, are those your friends or good business partners? It's silly to think everyone wants to be your friend. Everything should be judged by the behavior and the best way to test it is put it through a mock situation, see how they react. When nobody wants to do long term investment in some countries, hope you get the idea. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice...LOL.

    • @Number-cm1xg
      @Number-cm1xg 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You are right! They show the sign! if you try to blind it and it’ your fault 👍. Nothing is better than home !

    • @g600f700
      @g600f700 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Number-cm1xg with that said, not everyone is bad neither, just have to be careful and verify by the behavior/reaction. Some of them keep flipping based on profit/margin. You get all kinds of countries.

    • @MSDGroup-ez6zk
      @MSDGroup-ez6zk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nah bro, you lied. China was disappointed with the USA in WTO. The USA got heaps of fines and penalties but it has never obeyed it. If China and the USA were the founders of the UN, what would you feel if your rights were lesser than other founders? If the USA can disobey of international law, China can too.

    • @joeawk
      @joeawk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      To each country, its own to decide who do you want to buy from?
      The worst is when you lied about China using forced labour in Xinjiang when the world knows that Mexicans as young as 10 fill the sweatshops in the US.

    • @g600f700
      @g600f700 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@joeawk kinda true but you cannot reinforce our law/value on another country unless you invade them and take over. The only thing you can do is sanction. As individual, all you can you is read the label, check where it's made and decide.

  • @ericl2152
    @ericl2152 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Chine only has enough money to bail out one or maybe two sectors of it's economy. When the PRC is forced to pull the electric vehicle manufacturing subsidies, every Chinese electric car company will go bankrupt. The 4th IR is devastating globalization.

    • @kennyyap9745
      @kennyyap9745 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Visit the World by Yrself first before Comments....OTHERWISE PEOPLE KNOW U R STUPID.....😊😅😂

  • @mickgatz214
    @mickgatz214 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Personally, I reckon the batteries are the stumbling block.
    I have x2 18650 battery.
    One is protected, the other is not.
    Can you imagine what battery is used in EV's?......
    Doesn't matter what you buy, because inevitably you will have non protected cells driving you about.
    All it takes it ONE FAULTY CELL. and it's game over.
    Trust & Respect.
    Cheers!
    Mick

    • @lagrangewei
      @lagrangewei 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      that is why BYD created the blade battery. because it not roll but pressed, it doesn't easily leak.

    • @trygd100
      @trygd100 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Chinese car are crap

    • @1ewi5
      @1ewi5 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@trygd100 Just like your existence then.

    • @michaelandrews4783
      @michaelandrews4783 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@1ewi5 50 cent warrior

    • @Ruteger100
      @Ruteger100 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      They easily burst into flames while charging. How do you resell a used Chinese EV? Who will work on it when something goes wrong? @@lagrangewei

  • @goolooggg9005
    @goolooggg9005 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    US top trading partners 2023:-
    1. Mexico
    2. Canada
    3. China
    But why this CNA so biased painting a fake picture, China is the top trading partners for many other countries so its manufacturing should be performing well right
    America is just one marketplace, the rest of world marketplaces are bigger OK

    • @happymelon7129
      @happymelon7129 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Gxxg1e "The US-funded ‘think tank’ pushing Australia towards war
      By Bruce Haigh - an Australian political commentator and former diplomat.
      Jan 27, 2022"
      Most CNA "expert" are from AUS think tank ...now you know why..

    • @kapogin9360
      @kapogin9360 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      PAP is anti-China but pretends friendly with China. Chinese people & their government should wake up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @sunset3052
    @sunset3052 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Great program! Thanks for sharing!

  • @Trollope_rator
    @Trollope_rator 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    31:40 but how do you make sound business decisions when you can’t trust the statistics coming out of the country?

  • @SunisaSeeson
    @SunisaSeeson 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Congratulations 🎉🎉🎉😊

    • @ZakiHaider-y9o
      @ZakiHaider-y9o 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂Actually . If i watched the video
      Mexico imports from China 😂😂
      Turns out china is exporting to Mexico so u are still using made in china .😂😂😂
      Hurts didn't it .😂

    • @joeblack888
      @joeblack888 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ZakiHaider-y9o Vietnam also imports parts and material from China and put a label and export to US.

  • @seanlcs
    @seanlcs 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It's a good observe to see that China moving from manufacturing role to service providing role. Logically, when the country grows, the middle class grows too; so, low-cost labour force will diminishes. China probably sees this is coming when they shifted to African countries 10 years ago. It's an opportunity for those African countries to develop too. Because, the education, infrastructes, amenities, etc already improved to support the development

    • @bjung8858
      @bjung8858 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      My wife follows the Chinese news. She told me that East-Indians focus on medicine and being doctors more than Chinese. Where are the Chinese focusing on - besides Engr - I ask her? She said, Finance - like investing money.

    • @seanlcs
      @seanlcs 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bjung8858 Generally, Indians focus on service sector such as CEOs of MNC. I don't think Chinese really into finance, their stock markets mainly patronized by wealthy people.

  • @budisuwandhi6818
    @budisuwandhi6818 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    China companies have moves low end industries to other countries , while in China more focus on high tech industries , such as semi conductors , EV and many others.

    • @stvdmc2011
      @stvdmc2011 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That is why the tension with the US and EU begins. China is no longer just competing with the third world but competing with the EU, USA, Japan and sk on high end goods.

    • @budisuwandhi6818
      @budisuwandhi6818 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@stvdmc2011 It is not competing if China banned on those high end products by US , it more self reliance to produced for own industries. China refuse to be controled and depend on other countries.

    • @balakrishnasaralaya5546
      @balakrishnasaralaya5546 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China High tech goods? they are cheaper quality and hence cheaper at cost but costlier on long run

    • @budisuwandhi6818
      @budisuwandhi6818 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@balakrishnasaralaya5546 such as ?.

  • @leverage2010
    @leverage2010 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So what now?! Are you saying to remember 22:44 and continue doing business that bullied every country around them?! That’s BS!

  • @dannyboy8850
    @dannyboy8850 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    A lot of good advice in this video. 👍

    • @Dan8254
      @Dan8254 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Do you mean to say: a lot of bullshit?

  • @yangjohnny4395
    @yangjohnny4395 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Similarly China can also de-risk by setting up alternative financial systems instead of USD for trading and payment if the US weapons the current system for its own interest and advantages.

    • @urmokasela5649
      @urmokasela5649 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Good luck with that.

    • @sofjanmustopoh7232
      @sofjanmustopoh7232 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@yangjohnny4395 unless China WILLING to engage in DEFICIT trade .
      China cannot expect other countries to pay in RMB / Yuan .

  • @CKxperience
    @CKxperience 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    2 temporary weaknesses.
    Chips & Aviation. And some aspects of biotech.

  • @fhiek
    @fhiek 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Please do as possible. Bring some company to the Philippines to support us.

  • @jonathanbethune9075
    @jonathanbethune9075 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Derisking was something I considered as a hegde against covid. We shut our borders and found out what we lacked to support our populations.
    Resilience was the buzz word by-product of finding out what nations needed to be self reliant.

  • @Truth-of-the-matter
    @Truth-of-the-matter 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    With all of the immigration issues the U.S. faces between Central and South America I wonder why America didn't invest in Mexico and Central/South American friends decades ago to help build their economies and help slow the rate of migration? There is also a big factor that its much closer and wouldn't require massive cargo ships.

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Floating cargo is so much cheaper that it's worth crossing oceans for, compared to trucking/railing it in with all the security measures and multiple border clearances that overland trade involves. Part of the reason China is so successful at manufacturing is because so many of their major population centers are accessible by barges if not container ships.

    • @妮姆芙-o3z
      @妮姆芙-o3z 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Nowadays, freight ships can transport around 300000 tons of goods at once, but there is no such cheap transportation method on land. Moreover, China can complete all industries such as industrial manufacturing, textile industry, or metal smelting. China has sufficient power facilities, and Chinese factories almost never shut down. It also has the fastest ability to repair power facilities and road traffic. Most importantly, the goods you produce in China can be sold directly to a huge market of 1.4 billion people in China, which can help you earn more money

    • @msg4alexandre
      @msg4alexandre 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe it's because they need the cheap labours to do their gardens, build their houses, clean the homes, babysitting their kids and harvest their crops, imagine how unaffordable would be if they hire white Americans. That's why they will never stop illegal immigration, they need those immigrants to do the jobs they are not willingto do cheaply.

    • @AmandaHugandKiss411
      @AmandaHugandKiss411 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@妮姆芙-o3z there is a long well tested economic way to transport on land in all climate extremes and a manner of terrain. Fright trains.
      We use these through all our land, mountains, desert, forest etc in the 50+ Degrees Celsius in summer and -55 Degrees Celsius in the winter.

  • @faithrada
    @faithrada 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Those who foolishly put all their "eggs" in one basket typically regret it.

    • @NeostormXLMAX
      @NeostormXLMAX 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      19:15 did you even watch the video? 😂😂😂 triangular trade is just jumping through loopholes, china still sells to the us en mass just through middle men like vietnam and mexico😂😂

    • @moomoomouse7274
      @moomoomouse7274 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yup so alot of countries tried to put their eggs else where but ended up dropping them on the floor....

  • @gwang87
    @gwang87 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    OK, I'm still shocked to see Indian GDP as an unit in calculating Chinese GDP growth...

    • @merrick6484
      @merrick6484 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      An indian GDP every 4 years.😆

  • @pjacobsen1000
    @pjacobsen1000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Excellent piece! Good job, CNA.

    • @walentystankiewicz8486
      @walentystankiewicz8486 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      this is so obvious this is anti-China propaganda. The world is changing and there is no turning back.

    • @2024-te4wn
      @2024-te4wn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The quality of product from china is very very very poor !.

  • @udhayakumarMN
    @udhayakumarMN 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Well done CNA , now your documentaries on pair with CNN and BBC one 👏👏👏

    • @bernardtan427
      @bernardtan427 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I would say superior, simply by providing a balanced report untainted by blatant bias!

    • @blastermaster5039
      @blastermaster5039 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bernardtan427 I rather trust CNA than whatever CNN say.

    • @MaxBerry-j6d
      @MaxBerry-j6d 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bernardtan427 .... "balanced report untainted by blatant bias"??? You joking? CNA and most other "As!an" med!a all repeat their U-S-A mazter med!a's words and do their best to dem0n!ze Ch!na for their wh-->!!yte mazters.

    • @Trgn
      @Trgn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is that a joke. BBC and CNN are just extensions of Western geopolitical media machine. Western is notorious for lying for geopolitical goals. Meanwhile Singapore and rest of the neutral world has little reason to lie or pick side, thus more balance when they do their own research.

    • @neway518
      @neway518 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because CNA has decided to be unbiased! Haven’t you noticed that Singapore has shifted its foreign policy?😂😂😂

  • @beatrizmedeirosnoleto9391
    @beatrizmedeirosnoleto9391 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    China should develop its own domestic market, de-risking itself.

    • @dcc70
      @dcc70 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China's government is too corrupt to allow any meaningful wealth to trickle down to the consumers. The foreign currency earned with slave wage labor from export is mostly embezzled by the party elites, and the gaudy GDP is propped up by debt-fueled and increasingly frivolous infrastructure and real estate.

    • @komlat253
      @komlat253 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      haha they cant ,china is the largest importer of raw materials in the world, china is a nations that sells finished products so they do alot of buying then putting together things for sell. unfortunately this dont allow a huge profit margin as these factories actually pay alot of money to get stuff in the nation for production. on top of that ,altho china is a huge market ,they are not huge spenders in general having some of the lowest GDP per capita in the modern world .its not profitable for Chinese to sell to Chinese haha .this is why the government is so mad about it and always tries to tell people to spend

    • @ianbardon8581
      @ianbardon8581 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is already

    • @ianbardon8581
      @ianbardon8581 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China has many raw materials and minerals Inc over 80% of rare earth minerals.

    • @zhenggong-xi7jf
      @zhenggong-xi7jf 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@komlat253In fact, China is very special, the same goods are much cheaper in China, the purchasing power of Chinese people is not lower than that of the United States, China produces almost all categories of goods, and these goods are very cheap because they are sold locally without tariffs, except for imported goods, which are still expensive in other developing countries. Chinese people prefer to buy houses rather than rent houses. A lot of money goes into real estate, and China doesn't have property or inheritance taxes, which I think is why Chinese people don't like to spend.

  • @kayak0000
    @kayak0000 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It is a mistake for the chinese or anyone to think that chinese goods and services are indispensable. Everyone, everything is. The market is always fluid. If one disappears, others will take its place.

  • @Tracker709
    @Tracker709 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    A bit of advice. Some of us listen to your videos while working or driving. It would be helpful if the narrator
    Relayed what is in the subtitles. We can’t all steer at a screen for an hour. Thanks.

  • @JohnTube2K
    @JohnTube2K 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Very good content. Thanks

  • @manishdhawan551
    @manishdhawan551 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Elon Musk said Chinese electric car makers will find "significant" success outside of China, even as his auto firm, Tesla, faces intense competition from these same companies.
    "Frankly, I think, if there are not trade barriers established, they will pretty much demolish most other companies in the world," Musk said.

    • @brotherbig4651
      @brotherbig4651 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The end is no one succeeds in the field. Everyone has very thing margin or got kicked out of the market.

    • @hopeyes8686
      @hopeyes8686 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s because China EV companies have unlimited government subsidies. Open secret with simple fact.

    • @avt.q
      @avt.q 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Wow. Amazing insight from Musk. Because no one has mentioned this before.

  • @AlishbaRizviModel
    @AlishbaRizviModel 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How is the US using the dollars status as the reserve currency and printing more dollars to offer low interest rates to businesses any different than the CCP subsidizing China's companies? If there is a difference, it's that the US takes out money from the pockets of the other countries by devaluing their hard earned Forex reserves by printing more dollars wile China subsidizes it's business by the money they earn through their exports.

  • @phuachongboon3260
    @phuachongboon3260 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    But it is very good for South East Asia and India and Taiwan and Japan and USA ❤

  • @pepitocoronejo8495
    @pepitocoronejo8495 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    What's happening in China happened in the US and the West a long time ago! It's the normal progression in manufacturing economy.

  • @Dollarrmb-pk6ub
    @Dollarrmb-pk6ub 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Chinese companies invest in Mexico since Trump declared trade war. So it is still Chinese companies that supply to US. Except it manufacturers in Mexico.

  • @chephrenchua2744
    @chephrenchua2744 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    it's a good thing, as many viewer has seen right through, that we need to spread manufacturing among a few countries rather than depending on mainly one country, so wealth is spread among the world and opportunities. It's too bad if china cannot keep up with the situation to adapt.

  • @dlayeth
    @dlayeth 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    If you've been paying attention to China's "Tofu Dreg" Infrastructure... you'd understand some of the reason why some companies would want to move out of China. When the concrete of the supporting columns in the basement parking garage of a 30 floor building can be broken by tapping it with a cheap soft plastic water bottle, gas explosions are common, raised highways can't drain and flood when it rains, electric fires happen all the time, fire systems constantly fail, roads collapse into giant sinkholes regularly, sewer covers explode into the air from improperly done construction, and plumbing explodes everywhere even in 3 million USD high-end apartments... getting things built in countries where this isn't the norm is actually a pretty good option.

    • @XuesongWang-s5x
      @XuesongWang-s5x 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What kind of brain do you have to have to accept so much junk information?

    • @K1pp3rs
      @K1pp3rs 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Gawd dang wall o chyna… your insight is incredible

    • @davidlai6385
      @davidlai6385 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think you get confused. It sounds more like China's south western neighbors. Substitute paneer for tofu!😊

    • @danningsun7556
      @danningsun7556 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      对的对的,我觉得你说的对👍🏻

  • @shutatooi8165
    @shutatooi8165 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Lets ask Mr. Prof. Danny Quah. How does he explain those Island build on Spratley Islands?
    Using the money earn from the whole world to suppress ASEAN country?

  • @davidchung4691
    @davidchung4691 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    It depends on what kind of products. My view is only those labour intensive and low end products such as garments, shoes, some range of white goods and electronic goods may go but higher value and technology intensive products will take its place such as we see EV cars, high speed trains. and ship buildings even large passenger planes!

  • @StephenLee-u5m
    @StephenLee-u5m 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That won't happen unless China reduces military build-up in the South China Sea, Africa, South East Asian countries like Bangladesh, Cambodia's naval base construction, and South American County installed Satellite tracking antennas. The list goes on and on.

  • @RITMAN30
    @RITMAN30 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    The policy needs to be re-adapted to the new realities.

  • @williemyapfc8905
    @williemyapfc8905 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Derisk, decouple, friend shoring, whichever path the West choose, China is strolling few steps ahead.
    The Chinese Govt lead by identifying and risks capital into R&D while the Western model is entrepreneur driven with private venture capitalist.
    China leapfroged into EV due to vision and Govt willing to nurture industries identified for the future.
    Without Govt support, EV wouldn't have progressed to this stage.
    However fossil injected automobiles won't disappear overnight with many still drawn to the power of the "roaring vroom" compared to those silent EVs.
    Advanced chips restrictions are now the focus so let's watch how the "latecomer" China overcome and build up their own silicon tech industry.
    The core of China's industrial strength lies in deeply intertwined supply chain eco-system which is near impossible for any other country to replicate.
    While the West suppress, China in it's own way developed into aerospace, shipbuilding, quantum computing transitioning from low value to advanced tech industries.

    • @DK-ev9dg
      @DK-ev9dg 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very well said

  • @linsmandarin
    @linsmandarin 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The background music is so annoying😢

  • @nechoji
    @nechoji 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    China has built bridges and railroads, and through efficient logistics centers, it is shifting the low and mid-range to the underdeveloped central and western regions.
    For example, the largest Apple assembly plant is located in the poor central province of Henan, and the cloud computing center is in the western province of Guizhou.
    Only low-tech, high-polluting industries that China wants to leave behind, such as textiles, are moving to Vietnam and India.

  • @LifeHacksProducts
    @LifeHacksProducts 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    De-risking so that if war, they wont be too dependent😂😂😂

    • @zacksmith5963
      @zacksmith5963 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Awwww boomer
      😂😂Actually . If i watched the video
      Mexico imports from China 😂😂
      Turns out china is exporting to Mexico so u are still using made in china .😂😂😂
      Hurts didn't it .😂

    • @manchurian-pw8lj
      @manchurian-pw8lj 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you want to be chinese so badly laowai@@zacksmith5963

    • @melybautista1404
      @melybautista1404 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂

  • @LearnEnglishwithNetflix
    @LearnEnglishwithNetflix 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    High quality reporting!

    • @daweigo6851
      @daweigo6851 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Half of it is wrong and misleading

    • @aey2579
      @aey2579 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@daweigo6851I agree this is very biased. But I’m curious, which information on here is incorrect?

    • @Dan8254
      @Dan8254 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@daweigo6851
      It's so glaring right.

  • @sofjanmustopoh7232
    @sofjanmustopoh7232 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Suddenly Wolf Warrior diplomacy doesn’t work anymore 😄

    • @Amidat
      @Amidat 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      can you tell us what the actual numbers are?

    • @serenachen9385
      @serenachen9385 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I believe apple were be like banana 😂😂😂

  • @P-qi6qx
    @P-qi6qx 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Unemployment is high in Africa. Yet no factories are in West Africa

  • @poodleinadoodle3270
    @poodleinadoodle3270 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    We should also investigate the conditions of illegal employees from south America in the US.

  • @ongman1
    @ongman1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The first rule of international trade should be to never deal with dictatorships.

    • @avil8686
      @avil8686 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Like Singapore?

    • @川普大帝2024
      @川普大帝2024 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      众所周知,沙特阿拉伯、阿拉伯联合酋长国、巴林、卡塔尔等国家都是民主国家,美国在这些民主国家拥有大量利益

    • @brandonwoo8299
      @brandonwoo8299 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Like trump?

    • @JJ_178
      @JJ_178 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Where the iphone or ipad you were using whe. making this dumb comment are made?😅

  • @patrickrealestate-8193
    @patrickrealestate-8193 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Almost every product I pick up in stores literally says made in China

    • @B_y1n
      @B_y1n 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      The cheap stuff but did you look at your local Sam's club? Big flat screen TV made in Mexico or Vietnam. Hisense is a Chinese electronic company and their TV's are made in Mexico.😂

    • @FirstLastOne
      @FirstLastOne 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      You might want to stop shopping at Walmart then...

    • @BahamuyPY
      @BahamuyPY 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yo compro solo productos made in china para apoyar a la nueva potencia mundial, quien nos defiende de los abusos de EEUU y EU.

    • @zodwraith5745
      @zodwraith5745 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Cheap disposable plastic crap will continue to be made in China, just like it was before their economic explosion of the last 2 decades. But that junk has razor thin profit margins and have little to no effect on competing markets since most don't even waste their time with them. The products that really matter are high dollar items like automobiles and electronics.

    • @peacelover2008
      @peacelover2008 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@B_y1n but most of the owner still Chinese, they just produce in other country, but still the profit going to Chinese.

  • @Hendramail2000
    @Hendramail2000 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Good post

  • @Baobaoyoutube
    @Baobaoyoutube 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    看中国的义乌工厂,红订单多还是蓝订单多,就可以猜到谁是下一届美国总统了 😂

    • @Ruteger100
      @Ruteger100 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Finbolba en fonger! gan wont min solabbet!

    • @Al-oe8ib
      @Al-oe8ib 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah, and it is not the RAPIST

  • @robl4479
    @robl4479 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Everyone i know in America Europe and Latin America look for products not made in China! This time is coming. It was a big Mistake outsourcing everything to china.

  • @ozahmed4523
    @ozahmed4523 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    It should now be made in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran. Win Win like President Xi had said earlier in a speech! 🤝 The silk road was mostly about China and the 'stans'. Marco Polo was travelling the silk road in his chronicles BTW. Even Alexander the great travelled the silk road, for all the ancient Greek fans. The war elephants were an idea introduced to Europe in ancient times via Pakistan and India.
    Now China is getting wealthy and the labour costs are getting higher. So why not outsource low end factories to the rest of the silk road countries, and everyone wins. Its brilliant, and is just plain common sense for Asian countries. But first, you need an infrastructure called OBOR. All the US navy can do is sit near Taiwan in their ships and look from satellites, and watch this happen through their binoculars! (Forget wars, start cooperation for a lunar base)

    • @vishalbajaj4231
      @vishalbajaj4231 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Manufacturing in Iran and Pakistan lol 😂😂

    • @ababeel388
      @ababeel388 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@vishalbajaj4231lol😅 India

    • @sahilrajput5746
      @sahilrajput5746 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ababeel388Yes India total export was 776.3 billion dollars,
      India is second largest phone manufacturer, apple samsung already manufacturing their phones now Google gonna make its pixel phone,
      India already Third largest car manufacturers , soon Tesla is gonna come to set up its plants
      , We already have started manufacturing semiconductor, laptops, pc , servers, solar module, ev manufacturing and its battery, even manufacturing drone
      , Whereas paxtan begging 1 billion dollars 🤣🤣
      ,

  • @andrewmosqueda
    @andrewmosqueda 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    When I visited China 10 years ago, I noticed Chinese vendors trying to take advantage of me. First, they would show the price using their calculator, and then after I walked away, they would call me back and show me half of the previous price. And then, after buying, I found out that the price of that product in my home country was just half of what I paid. Street vendors in my country do not do that to foreigners.