@@andreiuta9400 his russian is enough for small talk but he completely ignores grammar and does not know advanced language, you can't really compare them
Very impressive that mr. Rosenberg got such a long, detailed and pertinent question in. Thank you for sticking to the task in what must be a difficult situation.
3:44 minutes. Expand NATO? Putin has been the one who expanded NATO. Did he really not see that coming?? The more countries he attacks, the more countries want to join NATO. It is logic. But not for Putin.
Which other journalists? All people with basic knowledge of what took place, and with a bit of common sense, already know what Putin had to explain to Rosenberg.
BBC is not a propaganda arm of the British government; RT is a propaganda arm of the Russian government. After three years of war with Ukraine, Russia allowed one western journalist to question Putin one time. Is this qualification of your comments too subtle for you?
@@geoffreykeenan5914 Come on ! BBC is full blown propaganda channel for British government and you know it. Only an moron will not see it. For being biased , it is not necessary to be government financed.
@@geoffreykeenan5914 one time? wich journalist or channel is baned there? While in the west, they are very good at one sided reporting and blaming and never letting us hear the other side... how about our leaders sit with russian reporters and answering Q... nah? no? oh ok...
So, in an undemocratic state, a foreign journalist can ask pointed questions to the leader of the country and receive a direct answer (no word salad). However, in our great democratic utopia, the domestic corporate media will not ask our officials any tough questions, and we will definitely not take questions from the Russian media. Amazing, I agree we really stand for democracy and freedom of speech.
@@pat-2024 Yes, explaining. That's what you do when you prove your right. Maybe you should consider that. Atleast when you want people to take you seriously.
@@60detikpintar There was never a signed agreement, the "promise" was only said in a conference by the german foreign mjnister in 1990. Even Gorbachev confirmed that there was never an agreement made
@@MattWiles do you mean crimea? the people wanted to be annexed, even US professors conducted survey again on 2019, and they 82% was in favor of russia. Also this is none of the US business since ukraine was never in NATO and could never be. Zelenskyy the comedian did a lot of damage to the ukraine economy. No one wants him to be president anymore, the war has to stop. US also keeps vetoing Gaza independence when 180 other countries already voted for it. stupid
Why did you cut out about 5 minutes of Putin's answer, Steve? Specifically, the answers that you wanted to hear from him about your own country. 3:24 "Now on the issue of fairness in the area of development and security. I have some thoughts on this, and I will try to answer you. Here are my thoughts. What is fairness in development? Look at very recent events - during the c*********s p******c. What was happening at that time? I want to draw both your attention to this and the attention of all other members of the mass media. At that time, the United States issued somewhere around six trillion dollars, and the eurozone issued somewhere around three trillion dollars, three and a bit. And all these funds were thrown on the world market, buying everything, first of all food, and not only: medical drugs and v******s, which are now being destroyed on a massive scale, because they have already expired. They threw it all away, and there was food inflation, there was inflation throughout the world. What did the world's leading economies do? They abused their exclusive position in world finance - both the dollar and the euro. They printed and swept the most essential goods off the market like a vacuum cleaner. They consume more, you consume more than you produce and earn. Is that fair? We believe it is not, and we want to change this situation. That is what we are doing in BRICS." 5:33 "You see, what is happening on the streets of some European cities is the result of the internal policies of these countries. But you and I know that the European economy is teetering on the brink of recession, and the leading economies of the eurozone are effectively in recession. If there is a slight growth of 0.5 percent, it will be at the expense of the south, where there is no serious production, it will be at the expense of real estate, the tourist industry, and so on. But is it our fault? What do we have to do with it? Western countries, European countries, have refused our energy resources. But we do not refuse. By the way, there is still one pipeline under the Baltic Sea - Nord Stream-2. What does it cost the German authorities? Just press a button and everything goes. But they don't do it for political reasons. And their most important partner - I don't know for what reasons - has created the conditions for a whole sector of the German economy to move to the United States, because the authorities there create more complementary conditions for business. And primary energy carriers there are three times, I think, cheaper than in Europe, or even four times cheaper - they have different conditions of taxation, targeted actions. But what do we have to do with this? This causes a corresponding reaction, because people's living standards are falling. It is obvious, it is the statistics of the European countries themselves. But what do we have to do with it? Come on, right? You know, as we say, this is an attempt to blame the situation on the healthy head by the sick head and to avoid responsibility for the wrong decisions in the economic sphere and in the sphere of domestic policy. In the economic sphere now, I think it is an obvious thing for objective experts, but many people in Europe and in other countries, in the United States, abused and are still trying to abuse the environmental agenda and the rising temperature on the planet. They are getting ahead of themselves, without sufficient justification in terms of technology development, they are closing everything related to nuclear power, they are closing everything related to coal-fired generation - they used to, didn't they? - they are closing everything related to hydrocarbons in general. Has anyone done the math? Can Africa do without these types of hydrocarbons or not? No. African countries and some other countries in emerging markets are being imposed with modern, yes, maybe even ecologically effective tools and technologies. But they cannot buy them - there is no money. Well, give them money then! And no one gives them money. But they introduce tools, which I believe are tools of neo-colonialism, when they lower these countries and make them depend on Western technologies and credits again. The loans are given on terrible terms, the loans cannot be paid back. This is another tool of neocolonialism. Therefore, we should first of all look at the results of the Western countries' economic, financial and domestic policies. And people, of course, are afraid of aggravation of the international situation due to escalation in various conflict zones: in the Middle East and Ukraine. But we are not in charge of this escalation. The escalation is always played by those who stand on the other side. Well, we are ready for this escalation. Think about whether those countries that are engaged in this are ready."
For those who are interested: it can be seen in its entirety without cutting/manipulating (the journalist has cut more than 5 minutes of the first and third answers) in ‘Press conference by President Putin’ on the Kremlin's youtube channel. This question is from minute 29:30 to minute 41.
This is actually the most interesting part lol, thank you. On Steve's cut he looks like an idiot (same for Steve, tho). Both the question and the answer are very weak, boring narratives. But "strangling" the world with emission - that is kinda interesting pure fact.
the same reason media has been cutting for years now. To distort the truth. The future is in independent journalism, corporate journalism like BBC has been dead for a long time.
Bro imagine being such a brainwashed retard u write like 4 paragraphs in defense of a guy who would have ur family killed if u crossed him is insane LMFAO..
It's easy to believe Putin's lies because of the way he speaks. When someone talks so well-mannered, it's easy to take for granted that they are speaking the truth. However, NATO's expansion is not due to imperialism like he wants you to think. NATO is a defensive alliance that guarantees countries' sovereignties. NATO didn't expand East, it was Eastern European countries that Democratically asked to join NATO to seek protection. The fact that Putin wanted the expansion of NATO to stop and felt as though they were victim is messed up when you consider the fact that he was basically trying to influence other countries's democratic choices and self-governance because they didn'tfit his demands. Russia can join a defensive alliance as well but, unsurprisingly, not many countries want a defensive alliance with Russia. If Eastern European countries seek NATO's protection over Russia, maybe Russia is, in fact, the problem. NATO's existence does not threaten Russia's existence. Russia is part of the BRICS, the UN, has strong ties to China and it's the largest country in the world. The way he victimises his country is crazy. If he wants his country to thrive, he should encourage male Russians to stop drinking themselves to death instead of sending them to war. What also doesn't make sense is how that somehow justifies the invasion of Ukraine. Not only have many countries turned against Russia but, let's not forget thousands of people are now dying because he chose to military force over diplomacy, which ultimately led to even more countries joining NATO. Now, because of him, thousands of Russian and Ukrainian kids won't be able to see their fathers anymore. Through this whole clip, he doesn't even mention the people who have perished. It's like he doesn't even care. These are all just numbers to him
As far as I know, west was the one who rejected diplomacy but decided to make money on military industrial complex. Even the days before war US seemed to pour oil into the fire instead of negotiating with russia.
Tell that to Serbia, Libya and Iraq that nato is a defensive organization, it it's whole history all the wars they have fought where outside their borders
Dude did you miss the part where he pointed out the USA overthrew the Ukraine and installed a Neo-Nazi as the “long-term” president Aka we installed a dictator We are not democratic bro 💀
It was absolutely true. You simply don't want to see it. Putin answered the questions without stonewalling and was pretty straightforward. This was not bs@@Thisisahandle701
Not only has he cut the last question, he has also cut / manipulated part of the other two questions. You can see it in: Press conference by President Putin on the Kremlin's TH-cam channel from minute 29:30 or so is the question until minute 41 (so this journalist / propagandist has cut 5 full minutes xdxd).
You are a brave man to ask such a question straight to the face of a mass murderer and war criminal. As usual, in his arguments and accusations he completely ignores the will and sovereignty of the Ukrainian people. That NATO, the EU or the "mythical West" did not organize any coup, but it is the free will of each nation to join any of these organizations. We, in the countries of Central Europe, which have all experienced russian imperialism and colonialism in the past, know this only too well. Kind regards from Warsaw.
For some strange reason Russians think that they might tell other countries what they can (or can't) do. Like for example which defensive military pact they might join. We had indeed the same here in Poland but luckily those times are over. Poor Captain Botox tries to pretend that he does not understand it. But he surely does, Russia will be lucky if ends up as "supplier of raw materials" and not something much worse.
@@mariust6769 have you been there? Or just you are talking nonsense? Let's look at numbers - Russia is a peanut compared to NATO, even when we compare to US alone. Even more - it's not able for 2,5 years of open full scale war to win with Ukraine which is many, many times smaller, has 4x less people, around 10x less GDP and so on. Russia is a declining state and we will still see it falling (slowly). What makes me really happy as they are the last imperialistic state in Europe which is a threat to all its neighbours.
@@marklouieadamehe can talk about the potential threat from NATO members in Central/Eastern Europe, however facts speak for themselves - 1994 Russia starts first Chechnia war, 2000 - 2nd war starts, 2008 South Abkhazia gets invaded by Russian troops, 2014 Crimea gets annexed, 2022 attempt to capture whole Ukraine. Get the pattern? If not, you are dumb. Lastly, funny how he speaks about 2014 Maidan as a coup when at the initial phases of Russian invasion in Ukraine, it is clear that Kiiv was attempted to be captured expecting that Zelensky will leave and puppet president (someone like Yanukovich) will take his place. If you have little knowledge of Russia and the region, please restrain from commenting as it doesn't look good on you👍
@@ecco2k771good words! Only someone that borders Ruzzia or has been previously occupied by them knows what it truly is behind all of the propaganda. pure devil, not better than nazi germany.
@@marklouieadame I did. An interesting collection of half-truths and plain lies. Served cold. Just show me one single sentence being true! Instead of answering he explains the situation was much worse during the peace time. Because Russia could have become a "second class" country if only this unbearable state has continued any longer. And no: there never was NATO Eastern Expansion. Someone who uses this term apparently doesn't understand the meaning of the word "expansion".
@@GamerFish99 bro, president's answer was more than coherent and understandable with RU's point of view well explained. You wish your leader can do the same, but it's just a wild dream with current puppets in government.
His argument is out of 1984. Ukraine was making friendly relations with the west, and that was a grave threat to Russian sovereignty? How? Unless Putin believes Russian sovereignty extends to Ukraine. This frames the conflict as West/Russia (which Putin knows is a more favorable looking stance) when it is Russia vs Ukraine. What about their sovereignty? This is the kind of insane doublespeak one would expect if a dictator
What kind of degenerate are you? I bet an American. Have you ever heard about Monroe doctrine? It says that if anyone puts their military in western hemosphere the US are gonna beat them with a stick or worse. Did they just extent their sovereignty over 50 nations? I cant believe that! 30 y/o people with a brain of a toddler - the curse of the western world.
@@karimvideo1 I’m sorry, what the fuck are you on about? Why should Russia get to own the entire Black Sea just because their shithole country only has one warm water port? Maybe Putin should be more concerned w/ the fact that Russia has one of the lowest standards of living and lifespan of any developed country
Lol There are some good politicians but in nato countries lastly they dissapeard Mostly in full world But as a spanish Nato countries got really ba din politics theme
Very brave reporter. Putin rarely has to answer these kinds of questions. And he did an excellent job by pointing out that Russia was safer before the invasion than now
Good job Mr. Rosenberg for asking the question that should be asked to this "man" daily. Nevermind his as always demented (purposefully) answer. Thank you, keep it up, and stay safe👍. You are doing God's work out there.
@@petermilne1203 CLEARLY, you did not see the side of President Putin, which I saw ! The general consensus, The BRICS Summit held in Kazan, is/was extremely successful. WHEN was the last time, another European Leader held such a large summit, with respective Heads of State, from around the world ? The European Heads of State always hold summits between themselves, EU Summits, The G7, NATO, ALL talking within an echo chamber ! The G7 was initially established for the most Industrialized Countries. Later The G7 was for countries with the richest economies, YET when India overtook The UK, was PM Modi invited ?
Putin underperformed with his answer! First part didn't make any sense and was contradictory, second part was wishful thinking on the part of Putin (Russia is just becomming a resource larder for China), third part was a feeble denial of what the world knows is the Russian style (courtesy of FSB).
Mr.scionkai Question: Putin claims that Ukraine will become a NATO member in 2022 and that NATO will have started building NATO military bases in Ukraine by 2022!!!? Can you prove this???! You know the facts!!!
Same old story that doesn't make sense. As if NATO forcefully made eastern europeans join the alliance when the real reason is that these countries only applied to join NATO in the first place because they wanted security guarantees against aggressive neighbors such as Russia. If Russia wasn't a threat these countries would never have needed to apply to join NATO. Another thing that doesn't make sense is that even if he had his wish granted and Ukraine is absorbed into/becomes a puppet state of Russia then he himself moved his own territory closer to NATO than it was without Ukraine.
@@dinodudedanny6324 yes but the world dosent work like that, the Russians goed out of Germany becouse of their free will not causing another war, Russia lost 24+milion! People in ww2...
@@dinodudedanny6324 in the Cuban Crisis Castro wanted nuclear weapons because he was afraid US would invade Cuba and yet this startled the US so much they were prepared for to go to war to get them removed. I am pretty sure if Mexico for some reason would want a Russian military base now the US will have a problem with that.
@@anaremelam5998 The difference here is that Mexico would never want a Russian military base on their territory in the first place, because Mexico is not scared that US is going to invade their country. So not really a good comparison. That said US is by no means a saint and has done bad things in the past, but that does just justify Russia doing bad things today. By that logic every country is a threat. Is Denmark bad guys cause they invaded so many countries in the Viking era? Is Germany bad guys because they started 2 world wars?
Good question and 1st to blame about making Russia a second class country, raw materials supplier is... Russian government that doesn't like to take any responsibility.
Would like to see you rule the biggest country that is filled by oligarchs from 90s. In Czech republic, where I live - they rule till this day and steal from the budget. Putin did a good thing not allowing oligarchs to the politics and it cant be a simple task to do with a country that has so many regions
@@FunnyBunny-pd5xx Probably a few weeks ago, I would guess. I have seen both of them give detailed replies to detailed questions. Maybe you should pay more attention to press conferences or interviews?
Don't be so sure, Putin is correct, The West wanted to demote Russia into a "gas station" as they call it, and neutralize it strategically by surrounding Russia with military assets, Ukraine was key to this and they wanted them in NATO. The rest is history.
No Russian journalist is cheering for that idiot. Russians are not stupid and as a matter of fact many are wondering why Putin even allows that BBC thug to even ask him questions when Russian journalists aren't even allowed in the press conferences in western countries. Propaganda only works to a certain extent.
@@SO-Negative also he did not had any information that could lead to hillary clinton arrest, or anything about epstein, boeing, openai, etc... We got your back, Steve.
There are 650 million Europeans and 143 million Russians. Does that also make you feel threatened Mr. Putin? I enjoy Steve's reports, his visits to Russian towns and his interactions with Russian people.
@@vincentmahon6423 BRICS Member Countries include India and China, the two most populous countries. In China, there are small villages with a population larger than some cities in Europe !
@@FunnyBunny-pd5xx and both of them are completely useless in the case of a global war. Endless meat can take you only so far, in the age of nukes. Why do you think China only true remark to Russia was to not dare to use nukes? As soon as those start flying, China and India can be literally obliterated as economies with just a couple of those well placed. The fact that European industries are quite spread up makes it far more difficult, and nobody, except mister Putin that is doing everything he can to not let it happen, wants to deal with a new European army on its doorsteps.
@@user-rf55l2y43m For months, each day, I have been spending between 8-12 hours, reading, researching, studying, watching, listening to, learning from people who are far more educated, than I am. As a former Student, I thoroughly enjoy learning, especially on this subject matter. I have a good memory for facts. I become ANGRY at the comments, which are subjective and NOT based on knowledge. My chosen subjects are, Twentieth Century European Totalitarian Dictatorships. Government and British Politics.
I think the question is important So many people are asking it I think the response of Putin is very important History will remember it It deserves to be recorded
Great question! Fantastic Russian (I am Polish and speak it too :). Fantastic courage! Putin is a well-schooled boy makes diligent written notes. Journalists are ahead and use laptops and phones :)
Putin is saying the truth. What is NATO? To whom it is against? If America says it defend it's interests then other countries have interests too. Lets not look on one side but all sides.
It is exactly against the kind of actions being perpetrated on Ukrainian soil right now, and many of its country members having had similar in the not-too-distant past.
Nations have always formed alliances, in the spirit of the enemy of my enemy is my friend, but everyone has their own interests in the foreground. If a nation or alliance becomes too powerful, it will eventually meet with resistance from other nations and conflict will inevitably arise. There are enough examples in history. NATO and the USA, the nation that governs and defines it, have crossed the line in our case. And this is not a battle between good and evil, these are geopolitical facts, nothing personal.
I'm really conflicted with information coming from all across the net. But one thing is certain: innocent people are used as disposable meat for a powerplay of higher powers, not to speak of all the things the "soldiers" do to people who canno rebel/resist against them.
Mr Steve, thanks for your work. Since you worked in Russia and have in depth knowledge about many processes in Russia it would be very interesting to hear an interview or podcast from you, on your experiences and opinions. Hopefully maybe later, when you retire or leave you job with BBC, so there are no questions about potential bias. I have an impression that despite all, deep inside you have very positive attitude of Russia and their leadership.
he doesn't have to because he didn't randomly invade a sovereign country for no reason. Putin is blacklisted in the west so this is his only way of spreading nonsense.
@@pegatrisedmice then I'm really curious what american troops are doing in literally all continents of our planet😅 You guys are taking place in literally every civil war on this planet, huh. It's weird for you to say that you're innocent lol Pardon me for my poor vocabulary, English isn't my native tongue
@@фийкё Your English is fine, and I'm not American so i don't really have a dog in this fight, but to your point, Biden did not invade Iraq and Afganistan, and many other countries that America invaded during Bush administration. I also don't think America is innocent and I think Bush should've beed proscuted for war crimes in middle east, because there were no weapons of mass destruction, which many Americans protested against. Bush was also replaced with another president because democracy exists in America, unlike in Russia where a dictator can do whatever they want and stay in power indefinetly. Also partaking in war is not the same as starting a war,
Tucker Carlson did that already in February. Rosenberg is a hack. He did an gotcha style interview with Lavrov so naturally Kremlin denied him an interview with Putin
The answer is truth. You should ask your western governments, why such things happens. Ukraine - is Russia's zone of influence, and western countries should get out, Russia will make them get out of Ukraine.
Mr Rosenberg , if Russia hadn't intervened in Ukraine , there would be US/NATO boots and nukes on its 2000 km border with Ukraine , US /NATO overrunning Crimea,US /NATO contolling the Black Sea . Would the US ever allow Russia nukes and boots as a threat on its borders ? Common sense should prevail here .
Your argument misrepresents the situation and uses hypothetical scenarios to justify an invasion: Hypothetical nukes: Placing US nukes in Ukraine was never on the table, even if membership was a possibility. Invasion as a solution?: Even if Russia had security concerns, a full-scale invasion of a sovereign nation is illegal and unjustified. Why waiting to install nukes in Ukraine having baltic countries border for 25 years and which is just 150km from st. Petesburg? It was an act of aggression based on false pretenses.
This is common "what if". Stalin attacked Poland with Hitler to "help fellow Russians under Poland regime. Hitler also argued that he must attack Poland to prevent invasion from Allies, to help fellow Germans abused in Poland, same lies in 1939 and 2022...
In what twisted reality would there be nato boots on the ground in Ukraine if he wouldn’t have invaded? Are you delirious? And by annexing Ukrainian territory putin is effectively moving his borders closer to nato. Also if the objective was to decimate russia ”the west” could have increased their support significantly as their combined budget is 1500x the one of russia. But no one is interested in doing what the war criminal putin is saying that others are out to do. The paradox is that the US is likely to help putin ”win” the war as trump will freeze the conflict. Isn’t that embarrassing for the war criminal, he needs the help of his arch enemy (5000 miles away) to win his war against his much much smaller neighbour. Pathetic
@@udarnik-yasha Can I have your personal guarantee that US nukes and NATO would not have wound up in Ukraine. The 2008 Bucharest NATO conference intended to expand into Georgia and Ukraine . The push for it failed in Georgia in 2012 .Please read about it . Russia nor the US would ever permit enemy nukes and troops on their borders Please read about the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis and the Monroe doctrine to understand more . The issue of Ukraine's independence is irrelevant here . Canada and Mexico can not do absolutely everything they want and neither can we as human beings . There are limits to national asperations as well as personal ones,especially for smaller nations neighboring big powerful ones. . To manitain its freedom ,all Ukraine had to do was to be neutral regarding NATO..Clear and simple . Sooner or later , countries are going to learn how to deal with US interference as they are beginning to do now .
In 1994 Ukraine gave up their nukes to russia in exchange for respect of the 1991 Ukraine's border and security garantees of the USA, UK and Russia (Budapest Memorandum) Russia have their nukes around the border of Ukraine since at 2014...and their nukes are also now in Belarus since spring 2024. Poland are in NATO since 1999 and they never had nukes from NATO at the border of Belarus...so Ukraine wouldn't have nukes neither. It's russia who is doing what you think Ukraine and NATO would have done. It's russia the terrorist state not Ukraine...putin is repeating history...like staline and others even before @@edvsilas8281
you must be Georgian. The biggest nonsense was your country attacking Russian peacekeepers and losing 20 % of the territory (source: The conclusions published by EU investigation commission, all disagreements to be directed to the EU headquarter in Brussels)
The boldest person in that crowded room of cowards. You could feel that that's the question nobody dared to ask, and yet if it were a western democracy, many flavours of this would have been asked by everyone and the guy/party would have lost in the next election (Bush and Blair after Iraq war). But here, everyone fears for their life because you're ruled by a tyrant. I hope Russia finds its true freedom and becomes a liberal democracy. So much untapped potential for Russia to become a true force for good and a superpower.
The sad reality is that Russians do not want the liberal democracy, they need a strong-looking Tsar… there’s so much work with their mentality ahead for smth to change in that country…
did you not hear him answer that nato started it and all the reasons of it? or are you still on the, Russia bad, putin bad, evil russia attacking countries for no reason? have you ever asked yourself why russia would take such a drastic action in the first place. the reason nobody dared ask it was because it was a stupid question that we already know the answer, Im surprised putin even had the patience to answer it again and again. why hasn't America tried to make peace, 0 attempts so far. russia could have been an ally, but we made them our enemy, do some research on this issue.
...and also cut out and threw out half of Putin's answer. We ourselves would never have guessed what can be listened to from his answer, and what part is harmful to our mental health. Thank you for censoring Putin's answers.
Why do i support Russia? Let's look at it in the most simple way possible. It's because of my ideology. Ukraine have violated 2 most essential rules: 1. Not discriminate people by nationality 2. Not try to recreate a cultural identity If you somehow don't agree that such rules must be followed, you violate my ideology. It is also my belief that it's in the interests of humanity to follow those rules. Those 2 violations also uphold the essence of nazism.
3. Don't Re-write history 4. Don't glorify Nazism 5. Don't sell your entire country's assets to BlackRock. (dooming the people's future) Your ideology is having basic moral standards!
@@StrawberryCosmonautwhat is there to explain? Russian-speaking Ukr citizens are denied the right to speak their native language and proclaimed 2nd rate citizens by constitution. Such citizens are basically forced to erase their identity by the ruling regime
@Steve Rosenberg Dear Mr. Rosenberg It was very brave of you to have made this statement and asked questions to... [Pu]! I have been hoping for a long time that an honest and brave journalist would ask the [Kremlin liars and criminals] these questions! Please ask yourself or a BBC colleague, next opportunity, how Russia will enforce its "(security) political" and economic interests in the BRICS in the future???! The reaction(???) from [Pu] and the "public" would be "very interesting"!!! 💛🕊Grüsse aus Deutschland Thomas Wunsch
It's a normal way for people like him to get his narrative through. Trump does the exact same. They repeat over and over again the narrative, and eventually people start believing it.
@@Esbbbb AND VP Kamela Harris doesn't ? No matter the question, generally her answer begins with "I come from a middle class family...." "The significance of the passing of time..." "If you think about it, we can be unburden by what has been......" "The price of bread as gone up x% , ground beef by x%, rent, school clothes...."
Perhaps because they're not as intolerant or as scared of opposing views as we like to portray. Also shows Putin is not as afraid of tough questions as we like to portray.
This guy willingly ignores everybody else’s right to security and sovereignty. He constantly ignores the fact that most ex-Soviet republics are now independent states that make their own decisions like joining NATO, if that makes them feel safer. He also sounds absolutely paranoid when he says that Europe wanted to turn Russia into a second class state… When in the name of truth did Europe express any such animosity against Russia ? Very good questions , Mr Rossenberg. ❤
Украина чувствует себя в безопасности в НАТО, а Россия чувствует себя в безопасности, когда НАТО находится подальше от наших границ. Вы говорите, что они могут принимать собственные решения, но и Россия может делать то же самое основываясь на их решениях. Это очевидно, разве нет? Вы сами игнорируете нашу независимость, запрещая нам защищать свои границы.
@@V3G4N01 Which explains (not) why russia has withdrawn forces from the border with Finland. In truth NATO has protected russia's border & Ukraine, as a sovereign nation, is free to choose its alliances. Ukraine has chosen the West & prosperity. russia had better watch its back, it is selling its soul to China.
Exactly. As we want to turn Ruzzia into a second class country?! Never heard so much BS. He has some unresolved issues and should go to therapy instead of killing people.
@@V3G4N01 Независимость России никто не игнорирует. Дело в том, что вторжение в суверенное государство - не правильный способ. Если бы Россия не взяла Крым, не нападала на Грузию итд, а решила таких дел дипломатическими средствами, я уверен что многие и в западных старах были бы готов слушать русских желаний и безпоскойств. Но так не случилось, Россия решила нарушать сувеременности Украини и вызывала смерть более 100.000 русских и украинских молодых. Это просто неприемлемое решение.
for those who dont understand.. just so u understand... protect..and create basis for development...whatever it takes... thats what any1, in its right mind, should do for urself ...and ur family
@@Led_WT that's because RT is not journalism, it is propaganda arm of the kremlin. The BBC is independent of the British government and often highly critical of the British government, whose leadership changes with different election results, unlike Putin who has been in power since 2000
If you ask Mr. Putin "What's the time?" He gives you a 10-minute lecture about why is this hour and this minute in Russia considering 500 years previous history.
@@Sotebolikurac is it tho? I mean isn't he the one who treats his people as second class citizens, oppresses them and kills people who do not agree with him? For me he sounds like a little boy who is afraid not considered as 'strong' anymore.
Not even our domestic journalists can ask Biden tough questions without him yelling at them like a demented old fool to shut up. He has done that many times.
I don't like Putin, invading Ukraine. But Putin is totally correct answering the third and final question. Mr Rosenberg, the reason there's chaos on some British streets is your country's irresponsible immigration politics. Nothing else. Your narrative that anything else is the cause of the chaos is shameful.
Idk I thought his points were very weak. He mentions the importance of "Russian security" while actively destroying Ukrainian security. He mentions Russian sovereignty while using mitary force to prevent Ukraine from deciding her own allies. Russia has a nuclear deterent, are we supposed to believe there was a threat of Ukraine invading Russia unprovoked?
Then you apparently have no knowledge. Which country was it who fell apart and out of it came many democratic free and modern countries?Who attacked Georgia, destabilised Afghanistan or put russian troops into Moldavia? This all happened before eastern european countries joined NATO and they all joined it due to Russia's and Soviet Union actions, because these small east European countries cannot defend themselves solely against such a big country. Also Sweden and Finland joined because of Putin's actions. You guys are brainwashed from a mentally sick mass murderer whose country has never been anything else. For hundreds of years the Russo doctrine does not even care about its own people! Pushing Humans into war like they are pigs! Disgusting!
He was KGB agent, he is excelent in propaganda and how to act on people. But this was pretty weak, i dont understand What you find valid. Hes bullshiting about independence of Russia but doesnt respect independence of Ukraine. There was never any threat from NATO towards Russia, he knows it, he just wants as much states under his control as possible. Tens of thoudands of people died and it didnt solve ANYTHING, appart joining Finland into NATO.
You forget about Libya and Afganistan. And two bombings of Yemen. And few more military operations here and there all over the world: Liberia, Pakistan, and Cameroon.
All these people talking about how unfair it is that their leaders are not asked these types of questions. You simply need to understand that this is exactly what Russia wants. To see them as “transparent” and “fair” and able to ask “dangerous” questions. It's all a wonderland Russia wants you to think it is. In reality, people are jailed, drafted, lose their jobs and so on. This is a singular foreign, or Western for that matter, journalist allowed in there. And it is so for the exact reason I mentioned at the beginning of my comment… to make Russia shine. So think twice and be thankful for the democracy you have. People out there are begging for it.
Well putin has a point. England needs to learn to keep their noses out of other countries affairs. We are not a powerful country to make the shots, why are we as uk embarrassing ourselves in today’s day in age. Our say or action means nothing in 2024!
@@lorenzo6868 fact is England needs to back down and learn it’s lesson. We have caused this through what we have done in the past and now meed to pay the consequence but we don’t want to accept or take responsibility for being wrong, this is typically our British Culture, an arrogant nation !
Bravo Sir! I'm amazed they let you ask a real question. It makes his position look so ridiculous. Russia is now subsidiary to the East, as opposed to the West.
Government coup? What about government coup in Russia in 1993? Donetsk bombing? What about Chechnya bombing in 90th? NATO expansion in Ukraine? What about Sweden and Finland in NATO now? He is talking about justice? What about justice in taking from Ukraine nuclear weapons and promising status quo for the borders and territories of Ukraine as the state? Nazism in Ukraine? What about nazism in Russian propaganda and nazism of Russian war in Ukraine?
One thing the reason why ukraine gave up it's nuclear weapons is because it wasn't there's all soviet weapons where mosly returned to the newly formed Russian federation. the 2 reason and the most important is thay didn't not have the capacity and capability to maintain and store dose wepons and all lunch codes are stored in moscow so even if thay had the capability to store tham thay wornt Abel to use them. it would cost billions to store them just for them to not be able to use them it was comen sense to give them back. 3 reason was because russia would not allow it for russian nuclear bombs or any to be in Ukraine even then it was a paramount declares of war russian was hevaly hart after the collapse but still had a strong military all this the usa also presherd Ukraine as well. even if by some miracle Ukraine was able to keep them with out being insteadly invaded or a chernobel disaster frome mismanagement russian Will come sniffing but even harder it would be a existential crise as soon as the russian military gets reformd you better baleve there invadeding an we all know the state of the ukraine military back in the 2000 and 2010 disfunction and the most curopet in Europe and berly getting funds like.i side comen sens to get rid of unusable bombs that you have a high risk of mismanagement and possibly haveing a nuclear disaster whill gathering a russian invasion whene your army is more of who can steal more money and literally not having ammo for 2 days of combat safe to say russian is not only taking Crimea this time
Rosenberg's Russian is fantastic. Never seen a British person speak so well in Russian
Bald and Bankrupt maybe
@@andreiuta9400 his russian is enough for small talk but he completely ignores grammar and does not know advanced language, you can't really compare them
“British”
Perhaps he’s a Russian Jew who migrated to the UK. He wouldn’t be the only one to do it.
@@forestcuriousity (((british))), that's how we say it russian to specify the subject being of jewish descent
(((any word)))
Very impressive that mr. Rosenberg got such a long, detailed and pertinent question in. Thank you for sticking to the task in what must be a difficult situation.
He is well respected even by the cult of Putin he speaks Russian unlike other journalists
Finally, Putin schooled him.
@@Macusakk By asking another 8 questions? I don't think so
3:44 minutes. Expand NATO? Putin has been the one who expanded NATO.
Did he really not see that coming??
The more countries he attacks, the more countries want to join NATO.
It is logic. But not for Putin.
@@Macusakkyou idiotic Ruski bot, he did NOT get schooled!
You could see all the other journalists hold their breath when Steve asked those questions which they dared not ask.
Which other journalists? All people with basic knowledge of what took place, and with a bit of common sense, already know what Putin had to explain to Rosenberg.
Mr putin called out the “chosen one tiny hat 🧢 Rosenberg @ :15 seconds the one in the hat”😂
Yes ,they couldn't believe that the BBC is that fucking dumb. The rest of the world is moving on and Brittan is not great anymore.
No, you could see other journalists going: "oh my god not this trash". Because they already know what garbage loaded question he is going to ask.
no because everyone knows its this western propaganda mouthpiece again
Well , RT is banned in UK.
Russia allows BBC to ask questions to its president.
BBC is not a propaganda arm of the British government; RT is a propaganda arm of the Russian government. After three years of war with Ukraine, Russia allowed one western journalist to question Putin one time. Is this qualification of your comments too subtle for you?
@@geoffreykeenan5914 Come on ! BBC is full blown propaganda channel for British government and you know it. Only an moron will not see it.
For being biased , it is not necessary to be government financed.
@@An1KumCome on! Stay realistic! If not, you are also a propagandist and a liar…
@@geoffreykeenan5914 one time? wich journalist or channel is baned there? While in the west, they are very good at one sided reporting and blaming and never letting us hear the other side... how about our leaders sit with russian reporters and answering Q... nah? no? oh ok...
Hahahaha you're funny and a clueless fool @@geoffreykeenan5914
So, in an undemocratic state, a foreign journalist can ask pointed questions to the leader of the country and receive a direct answer (no word salad). However, in our great democratic utopia, the domestic corporate media will not ask our officials any tough questions, and we will definitely not take questions from the Russian media. Amazing, I agree we really stand for democracy and freedom of speech.
this quote is sooo boring, because so wrong. like comparing apples with bananas
@@pat-2024
Then why is it wrong? Explain it!
Ohh wait, you can't. Because he is right.
@@Joejoe12-j2k OMG, that’s so boring…
explain explain explain , i am sure you can’t i am sure you can’t because because because BLABLABLABLA…
@@pat-2024
Yes, explaining.
That's what you do when you prove your right. Maybe you should consider that.
Atleast when you want people to take you seriously.
@@Joejoe12-j2k Honest answer! Did you know Rosenberg before this video?
How is it unfair that Nato expands east? Nato doesn’t force nations to join. Nations join Nato out of their own decision
NATO made a promise not to expand eastward in 1990s, they broke this red line
@@60detikpintar And Russia never invaded those countries to its East before 1990? Lol, delusional.
@@60detikpintar Russia also promised Ukraine to not annex them if they give up their nuclear weapons. Guess what they are doing now?
@@60detikpintar There was never a signed agreement, the "promise" was only said in a conference by the german foreign mjnister in 1990. Even Gorbachev confirmed that there was never an agreement made
@@MattWiles do you mean crimea? the people wanted to be annexed, even US professors conducted survey again on 2019, and they 82% was in favor of russia.
Also this is none of the US business since ukraine was never in NATO and could never be. Zelenskyy the comedian did a lot of damage to the ukraine economy. No one wants him to be president anymore, the war has to stop. US also keeps vetoing Gaza independence when 180 other countries already voted for it. stupid
Why did you cut out about 5 minutes of Putin's answer, Steve? Specifically, the answers that you wanted to hear from him about your own country.
3:24 "Now on the issue of fairness in the area of development and security. I have some thoughts on this, and I will try to answer you. Here are my thoughts.
What is fairness in development? Look at very recent events - during the c*********s p******c. What was happening at that time? I want to draw both your attention to this and the attention of all other members of the mass media. At that time, the United States issued somewhere around six trillion dollars, and the eurozone issued somewhere around three trillion dollars, three and a bit. And all these funds were thrown on the world market, buying everything, first of all food, and not only: medical drugs and v******s, which are now being destroyed on a massive scale, because they have already expired. They threw it all away, and there was food inflation, there was inflation throughout the world.
What did the world's leading economies do? They abused their exclusive position in world finance - both the dollar and the euro. They printed and swept the most essential goods off the market like a vacuum cleaner. They consume more, you consume more than you produce and earn. Is that fair? We believe it is not, and we want to change this situation. That is what we are doing in BRICS."
5:33 "You see, what is happening on the streets of some European cities is the result of the internal policies of these countries. But you and I know that the European economy is teetering on the brink of recession, and the leading economies of the eurozone are effectively in recession. If there is a slight growth of 0.5 percent, it will be at the expense of the south, where there is no serious production, it will be at the expense of real estate, the tourist industry, and so on. But is it our fault? What do we have to do with it?
Western countries, European countries, have refused our energy resources. But we do not refuse. By the way, there is still one pipeline under the Baltic Sea - Nord Stream-2. What does it cost the German authorities? Just press a button and everything goes. But they don't do it for political reasons. And their most important partner - I don't know for what reasons - has created the conditions for a whole sector of the German economy to move to the United States, because the authorities there create more complementary conditions for business. And primary energy carriers there are three times, I think, cheaper than in Europe, or even four times cheaper - they have different conditions of taxation, targeted actions. But what do we have to do with this?
This causes a corresponding reaction, because people's living standards are falling. It is obvious, it is the statistics of the European countries themselves. But what do we have to do with it? Come on, right? You know, as we say, this is an attempt to blame the situation on the healthy head by the sick head and to avoid responsibility for the wrong decisions in the economic sphere and in the sphere of domestic policy.
In the economic sphere now, I think it is an obvious thing for objective experts, but many people in Europe and in other countries, in the United States, abused and are still trying to abuse the environmental agenda and the rising temperature on the planet. They are getting ahead of themselves, without sufficient justification in terms of technology development, they are closing everything related to nuclear power, they are closing everything related to coal-fired generation - they used to, didn't they? - they are closing everything related to hydrocarbons in general.
Has anyone done the math? Can Africa do without these types of hydrocarbons or not? No. African countries and some other countries in emerging markets are being imposed with modern, yes, maybe even ecologically effective tools and technologies. But they cannot buy them - there is no money. Well, give them money then! And no one gives them money. But they introduce tools, which I believe are tools of neo-colonialism, when they lower these countries and make them depend on Western technologies and credits again. The loans are given on terrible terms, the loans cannot be paid back. This is another tool of neocolonialism.
Therefore, we should first of all look at the results of the Western countries' economic, financial and domestic policies. And people, of course, are afraid of aggravation of the international situation due to escalation in various conflict zones: in the Middle East and Ukraine. But we are not in charge of this escalation. The escalation is always played by those who stand on the other side.
Well, we are ready for this escalation. Think about whether those countries that are engaged in this are ready."
For those who are interested: it can be seen in its entirety without cutting/manipulating (the journalist has cut more than 5 minutes of the first and third answers) in ‘Press conference by President Putin’ on the Kremlin's youtube channel. This question is from minute 29:30 to minute 41.
This is actually the most interesting part lol, thank you. On Steve's cut he looks like an idiot (same for Steve, tho). Both the question and the answer are very weak, boring narratives. But "strangling" the world with emission - that is kinda interesting pure fact.
the same reason media has been cutting for years now. To distort the truth. The future is in independent journalism, corporate journalism like BBC has been dead for a long time.
Bro imagine being such a brainwashed retard u write like 4 paragraphs in defense of a guy who would have ur family killed if u crossed him is insane LMFAO..
You must be an utter idiot, bravo!
This is a VoD, not a TV air. There is no excuse to cut the video in exchanges like this.
It's easy to believe Putin's lies because of the way he speaks. When someone talks so well-mannered, it's easy to take for granted that they are speaking the truth.
However, NATO's expansion is not due to imperialism like he wants you to think. NATO is a defensive alliance that guarantees countries' sovereignties. NATO didn't expand East, it was Eastern European countries that Democratically asked to join NATO to seek protection. The fact that Putin wanted the expansion of NATO to stop and felt as though they were victim is messed up when you consider the fact that he was basically trying to influence other countries's democratic choices and self-governance because they didn'tfit his demands. Russia can join a defensive alliance as well but, unsurprisingly, not many countries want a defensive alliance with Russia. If Eastern European countries seek NATO's protection over Russia, maybe Russia is, in fact, the problem. NATO's existence does not threaten Russia's existence. Russia is part of the BRICS, the UN, has strong ties to China and it's the largest country in the world. The way he victimises his country is crazy. If he wants his country to thrive, he should encourage male Russians to stop drinking themselves to death instead of sending them to war.
What also doesn't make sense is how that somehow justifies the invasion of Ukraine. Not only have many countries turned against Russia but, let's not forget thousands of people are now dying because he chose to military force over diplomacy, which ultimately led to even more countries joining NATO. Now, because of him, thousands of Russian and Ukrainian kids won't be able to see their fathers anymore. Through this whole clip, he doesn't even mention the people who have perished. It's like he doesn't even care. These are all just numbers to him
As far as I know, west was the one who rejected diplomacy but decided to make money on military industrial complex. Even the days before war US seemed to pour oil into the fire instead of negotiating with russia.
Bravo
Tell that to Serbia, Libya and Iraq that nato is a defensive organization, it it's whole history all the wars they have fought where outside their borders
Dude did you miss the part where he pointed out the USA overthrew the Ukraine and installed a Neo-Nazi as the “long-term” president
Aka we installed a dictator
We are not democratic bro 💀
@@pjotrnygard1447Serbia was asked numerous times to stop invading foreign territory. Retaliation is to be expected.
Brilliant work Steve. You are very brave and your work is highly respected.
Steve truly is a fool and so is anyone else who believed the pro-ukranian media lies
Lmao
@@sabin2919 watch out guys there's an edgelord in the comments. maybe daddy vova will send you a few extra rubles this month. or maybe not
Desinformation isn't good!
Speak for yourself. He sounded like a fool to me, peddling the Western narrative.
Well done Steve Rosenberg. A giant in the BBC. Stay safe.
Zionist/Globalist BS. Piling it higher and deeper. Absolutely disgusting.
MI6 agent
@@Каш505only a Ruski idiot bot would say such a thing, therefore you are a Ruski idiot bot.
@@Каш505 Says a troII with a new account! 😂😂🤣
He had to publish on TH-cam on his own accont, because BBC censored him because he didn't ask the right questions.
Why did you cut out part of the answer?
Because it was unrelated to the question Rosenburg asked, and was more nonsense
@@Thisisahandle701 Have you seen it? It was coherent and overall strong answer
@@Thisisahandle701 no actually, it was because Rosenburg is a tool who doesn't like being shown up.
It was absolutely true. You simply don't want to see it. Putin answered the questions without stonewalling and was pretty straightforward. This was not bs@@Thisisahandle701
@@Thisisahandle701according to who?
The final part of the answer has been cutted away... It was interesting. Please, upload a complete version.
Not only has he cut the last question, he has also cut / manipulated part of the other two questions. You can see it in: Press conference by President Putin on the Kremlin's TH-cam channel from minute 29:30 or so is the question until minute 41 (so this journalist / propagandist has cut 5 full minutes xdxd).
typical western "freedom of speech"
WOW Steve!
Great, hard hitting and direct questions to Putin. I worry for your safety, you are a very brave man. 😊👏🏻
"4000 BC, when Hagar the Hairy left his mighty cavern..."
great comment
You are a brave man to ask such a question straight to the face of a mass murderer and war criminal. As usual, in his arguments and accusations he completely ignores the will and sovereignty of the Ukrainian people. That NATO, the EU or the "mythical West" did not organize any coup, but it is the free will of each nation to join any of these organizations. We, in the countries of Central Europe, which have all experienced russian imperialism and colonialism in the past, know this only too well. Kind regards from Warsaw.
For some strange reason Russians think that they might tell other countries what they can (or can't) do. Like for example which defensive military pact they might join. We had indeed the same here in Poland but luckily those times are over. Poor Captain Botox tries to pretend that he does not understand it. But he surely does, Russia will be lucky if ends up as "supplier of raw materials" and not something much worse.
🤣🤣🤣🤣 both Ukraine and NATO is dying
@@mariust6769only in your Putin Puppy dreams…
You mean Netanyahu, Obama, Bush etc
@@mariust6769 have you been there? Or just you are talking nonsense? Let's look at numbers - Russia is a peanut compared to NATO, even when we compare to US alone. Even more - it's not able for 2,5 years of open full scale war to win with Ukraine which is many, many times smaller, has 4x less people, around 10x less GDP and so on. Russia is a declining state and we will still see it falling (slowly). What makes me really happy as they are the last imperialistic state in Europe which is a threat to all its neighbours.
Keep asking the tough questions Steve. Very few others do. Even if he evades them. Evasion in itself, speaks millions.
Stay safe Sir.
Huh did u listen to his answer? Or just deaf and wanted your preffered answer lol
@@marklouieadamehe can talk about the potential threat from NATO members in Central/Eastern Europe, however facts speak for themselves - 1994 Russia starts first Chechnia war, 2000 - 2nd war starts, 2008 South Abkhazia gets invaded by Russian troops, 2014 Crimea gets annexed, 2022 attempt to capture whole Ukraine. Get the pattern? If not, you are dumb. Lastly, funny how he speaks about 2014 Maidan as a coup when at the initial phases of Russian invasion in Ukraine, it is clear that Kiiv was attempted to be captured expecting that Zelensky will leave and puppet president (someone like Yanukovich) will take his place. If you have little knowledge of Russia and the region, please restrain from commenting as it doesn't look good on you👍
@@ecco2k771good words! Only someone that borders Ruzzia or has been previously occupied by them knows what it truly is behind all of the propaganda. pure devil, not better than nazi germany.
@@marklouieadame I did. An interesting collection of half-truths and plain lies. Served cold.
Just show me one single sentence being true! Instead of answering he explains the situation was much worse during the peace time. Because Russia could have become a "second class" country if only this unbearable state has continued any longer.
And no: there never was NATO Eastern Expansion.
Someone who uses this term apparently doesn't understand the meaning of the word "expansion".
@@ecco2k771 reading your comment it’s clear you have zero knowledge on the Russian region.
When will US president answer questions from foreign country journalists?
😂
Never!
Russian bots must really love the US
Every time they get a hard question "bUt wHaT aBoUT uS??"
Wie kommst du darauf, dass sie es nicht tun? Du kannst dir im Internet ansehen, wie sie es tun....
@@GamerFish99 bro, president's answer was more than coherent and understandable with RU's point of view well explained.
You wish your leader can do the same, but it's just a wild dream with current puppets in government.
Professional gaslighter tries to justify invasion of a country that did nothing to his own...
1. It did. 2. It explicitly pronounced it will do more. 3. Russia is legally obliged to enforce the Minsk Agreements as their guarantor.
"that did nothing to his own"
What do you mean by that?
@@Dreamcatcher9000 I mean Ukraine did nothing to Putin's own country.
@@yeruschmift8422 Ok, what did Ukraine do to Russia that justifies use of brutal military force ?
Random brainwashed idiot doesn’t know that war had been going on since 2014, after a state coup.
His argument is out of 1984. Ukraine was making friendly relations with the west, and that was a grave threat to Russian sovereignty? How? Unless Putin believes Russian sovereignty extends to Ukraine. This frames the conflict as West/Russia (which Putin knows is a more favorable looking stance) when it is Russia vs Ukraine. What about their sovereignty? This is the kind of insane doublespeak one would expect if a dictator
Putin is murdering dictator who has robbed his own country blind to benefit himself and his friends. Nobody should take anything he says seriously.
What kind of degenerate are you? I bet an American. Have you ever heard about Monroe doctrine? It says that if anyone puts their military in western hemosphere the US are gonna beat them with a stick or worse. Did they just extent their sovereignty over 50 nations? I cant believe that!
30 y/o people with a brain of a toddler - the curse of the western world.
friendly relations with West with military bases in Black Sea, for sure 😄
@@karimvideo1ooh yeah, and putin's actions definitely deescalated this and pushed nato away from russia. right?
@@karimvideo1 I’m sorry, what the fuck are you on about? Why should Russia get to own the entire Black Sea just because their shithole country only has one warm water port? Maybe Putin should be more concerned w/ the fact that Russia has one of the lowest standards of living and lifespan of any developed country
How do you know, when a politician is lying?
When his lips are moving.
Lol
There are some good politicians but in nato countries lastly they dissapeard
Mostly in full world
But as a spanish
Nato countries got really ba din politics theme
Believe it or not, in Russia this is an actual saying about ukrainians 😆
how do you know the sharpest parts of the video are manipulated? When it is from a British journalist
@@ФеофанЭтополедолжнобытьзаполне The whole WORLD has heard the one about ‘How do you know when a Russian is lying?’
You are a brave man Mr. Rosenberg. Stay safe.
Very brave reporter. Putin rarely has to answer these kinds of questions. And he did an excellent job by pointing out that Russia was safer before the invasion than now
Good job Mr. Rosenberg for asking the question that should be asked to this "man" daily. Nevermind his as always demented (purposefully) answer. Thank you, keep it up, and stay safe👍. You are doing God's work out there.
you asked the a tougher question than the entire interview with tucker carlson and putin. Well done👏
Have you noticed that the full answer where left out on this video…
Journalist shall report the facts, shall not provide opinions or their own view.
Propagandist shall.
Well put and great questions Mr. Rosenberg.
Notice that he's free to ask them. Where are the Russian reporters at NATO press conferences?
@@psnaris There were Russian journalists there! Check before you post a message, bot.
@@Pippie5555your also a bot
@@Mia-sp5wh Learn to spell 😂
Great video, great question, I’m glad it was asked, and I’m glad it was answered, but also good to fall asleep to
Putin is writing what exactly the FSB should do with him after the press conference XD
Great question, Steve. You ruffled his feathers!
@@petermilne1203
CLEARLY, you did not see the side of President Putin, which I saw !
The general consensus, The BRICS Summit held in Kazan, is/was extremely successful.
WHEN was the last time, another European Leader held such a large summit, with respective Heads of State, from around the world ?
The European Heads of State always hold summits between themselves, EU Summits, The G7, NATO,
ALL talking within an echo chamber !
The G7 was initially established for the most Industrialized Countries.
Later The G7 was for countries with the richest economies,
YET
when India overtook The UK, was PM Modi invited ?
What feathers? Putin schooled him as if Rosenberg doesn't understand most obvious things.
@@ihikebc2295 Precisely!
"Ruffled his feathers!" Ruffling feathers means him chuckling at Steve's arrogant question because of it's sheer misguidance. 😂
@@petermilne1203
Steve Rosenberg is a BBC Correspondant.
I doubt, The BBC aired President Putin's response, in full on The UK's 10 O'clock News !
Putin underperformed with his answer! First part didn't make any sense and was contradictory, second part was wishful thinking on the part of Putin (Russia is just becomming a resource larder for China), third part was a feeble denial of what the world knows is the Russian style (courtesy of FSB).
this is what it looks like when kgb runs a country
This whole schitzo comment you just pooped out is wishful thinking based on brainwashed NPC opinion.
Exactly
Look for the unedited Putin's answer.
@@sovietguardianstill made no sense
There is no point in asking a question if the answer is always "It's the West's fault".
Because it's the west's fault?
How would you react if Cuba convinces Florida of becoming a full independent communist and leaving the US?(in a hypothetical case)
@@feska12 Because itq the west’s fault
@@yubakadi217 Yes, they should have had gave Ukranians weapons they needed when Putin decided to attack Ukraine back in 2014 !
@@andresacuna1108How in any way is that equivalent?
Thank you for asking these questions, Steve Rosenberg.
No word salads, no bullshit, just straight up answers to your questions. Western leaders need to take lessons from Putin.
sure, RuZZian troll
₽₽₽
Mr.scionkai Question: Putin claims that Ukraine will become a NATO member in 2022 and that NATO will have started building NATO military bases in Ukraine by 2022!!!? Can you prove this???! You know the facts!!!
And yet he seems to have forgot that the main goal was denazification of Ukraine.
Brainwashed a bit?? Better listen to your master 😂
Predictable, frustrating answer to a solid question. Putin dwells in a world of his own imagining.
Same old story that doesn't make sense. As if NATO forcefully made eastern europeans join the alliance when the real reason is that these countries only applied to join NATO in the first place because they wanted security guarantees against aggressive neighbors such as Russia. If Russia wasn't a threat these countries would never have needed to apply to join NATO.
Another thing that doesn't make sense is that even if he had his wish granted and Ukraine is absorbed into/becomes a puppet state of Russia then he himself moved his own territory closer to NATO than it was without Ukraine.
@@dinodudedanny6324 nato expands for one reason in particular: new countries want in.
@@dinodudedanny6324 yes but the world dosent work like that, the Russians goed out of Germany becouse of their free will not causing another war, Russia lost 24+milion! People in ww2...
@@dinodudedanny6324 in the Cuban Crisis Castro wanted nuclear weapons because he was afraid US would invade Cuba and yet this startled the US so much they were prepared for to go to war to get them removed. I am pretty sure if Mexico for some reason would want a Russian military base now the US will have a problem with that.
@@anaremelam5998 The difference here is that Mexico would never want a Russian military base on their territory in the first place, because Mexico is not scared that US is going to invade their country. So not really a good comparison. That said US is by no means a saint and has done bad things in the past, but that does just justify Russia doing bad things today. By that logic every country is a threat. Is Denmark bad guys cause they invaded so many countries in the Viking era? Is Germany bad guys because they started 2 world wars?
Brave reporting. Congratulations
Ahah I bet he wrote "ask him to repeat last question," so he could giggle and undermine the question 🤪
Thank you Mr. Rosenberg
Good question and 1st to blame about making Russia a second class country, raw materials supplier is... Russian government that doesn't like to take any responsibility.
Would like to see you rule the biggest country that is filled by oligarchs from 90s. In Czech republic, where I live - they rule till this day and steal from the budget. Putin did a good thing not allowing oligarchs to the politics and it cant be a simple task to do with a country that has so many regions
@dashkino_shortsолигархи - это друзья путина. приезжай в россию, поживи тут.
Thank you for this!
‘The one in the hat?’ - No, it’s not that maniac, Mr President… 😄
Great question, Mr. Rosenberg ! 👏💯🫶
Good job Steve.
Peskov smirking while he says ‘BBC’. I can only imagine they just love the spotlight on them.
Lol the smirk is because they already know what the narrative of the question will be.
@@freetrialhaha..and BBC knew the fairy-tale answers.😅
@@sallywilton2236 I think Peskov secretly admires the size of Steven's balls. No one in Russia talks directly with Putin, but Steve can
When watching Steve give his question, I wonder how many of the Russian journalist contingent are silently cheering him on.
@@bganonimouse2754
WHEN was the last time, POTUS Biden or PM Starmer gave Journalist the floor, or gave a long detailed reply ?
@@bganonimouse2754
"When watching Steve...."
IMO, he looked like an uncomfortable school boy being educated by the Headmaster.
@@FunnyBunny-pd5xx Probably a few weeks ago, I would guess.
I have seen both of them give detailed replies to detailed questions.
Maybe you should pay more attention to press conferences or interviews?
Don't be so sure, Putin is correct, The West wanted to demote Russia into a "gas station" as they call it, and neutralize it strategically by surrounding Russia with military assets, Ukraine was key to this and they wanted them in NATO. The rest is history.
No Russian journalist is cheering for that idiot. Russians are not stupid and as a matter of fact many are wondering why Putin even allows that BBC thug to even ask him questions when Russian journalists aren't even allowed in the press conferences in western countries. Propaganda only works to a certain extent.
His voice and facial expressions are nothing like I'd imagined
Remember, Steven Rosenberg was not clumsy man nor was he suidical.
@@SO-Negative also he did not had any information that could lead to hillary clinton arrest, or anything about epstein, boeing, openai, etc...
We got your back, Steve.
His answers are self-revelatory.
Mr Rosenberg, I hope you write a book about all this one day.
self-revelatory 🤔
@@medved443Yeah, I wonder what he meant by saying that?
Book "How I asked Mr. Putin a question and cut out and hid half of his answer".
before writing a book he can start posting unedited videos, would be a great beginning
There are 650 million Europeans and 143 million Russians. Does that also make you feel threatened Mr. Putin?
I enjoy Steve's reports, his visits to Russian towns and his interactions with Russian people.
Not if most of them are minding their own business.
@@vincentmahon6423
BRICS Member Countries include India and China, the two most populous countries.
In China, there are small villages with a population larger than some cities in Europe !
@@FunnyBunny-pd5xx and both of them are completely useless in the case of a global war. Endless meat can take you only so far, in the age of nukes. Why do you think China only true remark to Russia was to not dare to use nukes? As soon as those start flying, China and India can be literally obliterated as economies with just a couple of those well placed.
The fact that European industries are quite spread up makes it far more difficult, and nobody, except mister Putin that is doing everything he can to not let it happen, wants to deal with a new European army on its doorsteps.
@@FunnyBunny-pd5xxyou’re working overtime in the comments aren’t you
@@user-rf55l2y43m
For months, each day, I have been spending between 8-12 hours, reading, researching, studying,
watching, listening to, learning from people who are far more educated, than I am.
As a former Student, I thoroughly enjoy learning, especially on this subject matter.
I have a good memory for facts.
I become ANGRY at the comments, which are subjective and NOT based on knowledge.
My chosen subjects are,
Twentieth Century European Totalitarian Dictatorships.
Government and British Politics.
It would be extraordinary if your friendship had led to peace.
Putins typical answer: bla,bla,bla ....bla
A fox in human shape that man...
sure thing
I'ts clear that he's having a personal vendetta. 🤔
He is just defending his country. He is doing just his job,
I don't understand where you saw the signs for a vendetta there.
Bro, go read what a vendetta is.
Defending it from ghosts
There might be a subtle correlation between Putin condemning Gaza genocide and the surname "Rosenberg"
He didn't answer his question, He slapped that answer his question
❤ mr. Steve Rosenberg, u r a braveheart héroe of honest information 👏🗽🙏🏿
Wish more people were like Mr Rosenberg
I think the question is important
So many people are asking it
I think the response of Putin is very important
History will remember it
It deserves to be recorded
"I think Putin's answer is very important," but Mr. Rosenberg doesn't think so: He cut and threw out half of Putin's answer.
nice work Steve, speak truth to power
So did Putin.
@@TheGranicdPutin spoke more facts.
I hope countries resolve their disputes and rivalries amicably and quickly. 🍀
Great question! Fantastic Russian (I am Polish and speak it too :). Fantastic courage! Putin is a well-schooled boy makes diligent written notes. Journalists are ahead and use laptops and phones :)
Putin is saying the truth. What is NATO? To whom it is against? If America says it defend it's interests then other countries have interests too. Lets not look on one side but all sides.
you are russian propaganda idiot
It is exactly against the kind of actions being perpetrated on Ukrainian soil right now, and many of its country members having had similar in the not-too-distant past.
@@corruptandimmoral You are a western propaganda idiot
@@mmsk999and against what was Serbia bombing?
Or do we have short memory?
Nations have always formed alliances, in the spirit of the enemy of my enemy is my friend, but everyone has their own interests in the foreground. If a nation or alliance becomes too powerful, it will eventually meet with resistance from other nations and conflict will inevitably arise. There are enough examples in history. NATO and the USA, the nation that governs and defines it, have crossed the line in our case. And this is not a battle between good and evil, these are geopolitical facts, nothing personal.
I'm really conflicted with information coming from all across the net. But one thing is certain: innocent people are used as disposable meat for a powerplay of higher powers, not to speak of all the things the "soldiers" do to people who canno rebel/resist against them.
Молодец, Стив! Хороший вопрос.
@SteveRosenberg why you didn't show the full response, didn't you like it? Good job Steve, good job very " brave" hahah
Mr Steve, thanks for your work.
Since you worked in Russia and have in depth knowledge about many processes in Russia it would be very interesting to hear an interview or podcast from you, on your experiences and opinions. Hopefully maybe later, when you retire or leave you job with BBC, so there are no questions about potential bias. I have an impression that despite all, deep inside you have very positive attitude of Russia and their leadership.
excellent journalism
Scroll down the comments to make sure you know where to find the unedited version of Putin's answer.
Is it normal for an excellent Western journalist to cut out and hide half of the answer?
Can you imagine Biden answering a question like this lol
he doesn't have to because he didn't randomly invade a sovereign country for no reason. Putin is blacklisted in the west so this is his only way of spreading nonsense.
@@pegatrisedmice then I'm really curious what american troops are doing in literally all continents of our planet😅
You guys are taking place in literally every civil war on this planet, huh. It's weird for you to say that you're innocent lol
Pardon me for my poor vocabulary, English isn't my native tongue
@@pegatrisedmice He voted invade a Iraq for false reason
A president who’s too old to produce the nesacerry text for an answer is just as useless as a president who lies as an answer.
@@фийкё Your English is fine, and I'm not American so i don't really have a dog in this fight, but to your point, Biden did not invade Iraq and Afganistan, and many other countries that America invaded during Bush administration. I also don't think America is innocent and I think Bush should've beed proscuted for war crimes in middle east, because there were no weapons of mass destruction, which many Americans protested against. Bush was also replaced with another president because democracy exists in America, unlike in Russia where a dictator can do whatever they want and stay in power indefinetly. Also partaking in war is not the same as starting a war,
Great question for a pathological liar and murderer....
Steve, right"
@@psnaris Yes Steve is right
Where is the lie in his statement?
You mean Biden and Satanyahu.
@@dwl3006who's statement
Спасибо вам за вашу работу, Стивен
How much respect the world has for him❤
Finally someone starts asking Putin these questions. Thank you sir! The answer doesn’t make a whole lot of sense, but that’s a different story.
Tucker Carlson did that already in February. Rosenberg is a hack. He did an gotcha style interview with Lavrov so naturally Kremlin denied him an interview with Putin
The answer is truth. You should ask your western governments, why such things happens. Ukraine - is Russia's zone of influence, and western countries should get out, Russia will make them get out of Ukraine.
Steve Rosenberg's questions, framed very coyly, were revealing enough for Putin to reveal it in its entirety by answering truthfully!
Bruh
Bruh! Thanks for the support.
Mr Rosenberg , if Russia hadn't intervened in Ukraine , there would be US/NATO boots and nukes on its 2000 km border with Ukraine , US /NATO overrunning Crimea,US /NATO contolling the Black Sea . Would the US ever allow Russia nukes and boots as a threat on its borders ? Common sense should prevail here .
Your argument misrepresents the situation and uses hypothetical scenarios to justify an invasion:
Hypothetical nukes: Placing US nukes in Ukraine was never on the table, even if membership was a possibility.
Invasion as a solution?: Even if Russia had security concerns, a full-scale invasion of a sovereign nation is illegal and unjustified.
Why waiting to install nukes in Ukraine having baltic countries border for 25 years and which is just 150km from st. Petesburg?
It was an act of aggression based on false pretenses.
This is common "what if". Stalin attacked Poland with Hitler to "help fellow Russians under Poland regime. Hitler also argued that he must attack Poland to prevent invasion from Allies, to help fellow Germans abused in Poland, same lies in 1939 and 2022...
In what twisted reality would there be nato boots on the ground in Ukraine if he wouldn’t have invaded? Are you delirious? And by annexing Ukrainian territory putin is effectively moving his borders closer to nato.
Also if the objective was to decimate russia ”the west” could have increased their support significantly as their combined budget is 1500x the one of russia. But no one is interested in doing what the war criminal putin is saying that others are out to do.
The paradox is that the US is likely to help putin ”win” the war as trump will freeze the conflict. Isn’t that embarrassing for the war criminal, he needs the help of his arch enemy (5000 miles away) to win his war against his much much smaller neighbour. Pathetic
@@udarnik-yasha Can I have your personal guarantee that US nukes and NATO would not have wound up in Ukraine. The 2008 Bucharest NATO conference intended to expand into Georgia and Ukraine . The push for it failed in Georgia in 2012 .Please read about it . Russia nor the US would ever permit enemy nukes and troops on their borders Please read about the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis and the Monroe doctrine to understand more . The issue of Ukraine's independence is irrelevant here . Canada and Mexico can not do absolutely everything they want and neither can we as human beings . There are limits to national asperations as well as personal ones,especially for smaller nations neighboring big powerful ones. . To manitain its freedom ,all Ukraine had to do was to be neutral regarding NATO..Clear and simple . Sooner or later , countries are going to learn how to deal with US interference as they are beginning to do now .
In 1994 Ukraine gave up their nukes to russia in exchange for respect of the 1991 Ukraine's border and security garantees of the USA, UK and Russia (Budapest Memorandum)
Russia have their nukes around the border of Ukraine since at 2014...and their nukes are also now in Belarus since spring 2024.
Poland are in NATO since 1999 and they never had nukes from NATO at the border of Belarus...so Ukraine wouldn't have nukes neither. It's russia who is doing what you think Ukraine and NATO would have done.
It's russia the terrorist state not Ukraine...putin is repeating history...like staline and others even before
@@edvsilas8281
5:20 "But it's utter nonsense" - He had exact the same smile when responding on Ukraine before his invesion
Duper's delight.
Bro wtf are u saying just go sleep you really tired and ur brain don't working fr
Sigma smile
you must be Georgian. The biggest nonsense was your country attacking Russian peacekeepers and losing 20 % of the territory (source: The conclusions published by EU investigation commission, all disagreements to be directed to the EU headquarter in Brussels)
i enjoyed this exchange of words
The boldest person in that crowded room of cowards. You could feel that that's the question nobody dared to ask, and yet if it were a western democracy, many flavours of this would have been asked by everyone and the guy/party would have lost in the next election (Bush and Blair after Iraq war). But here, everyone fears for their life because you're ruled by a tyrant. I hope Russia finds its true freedom and becomes a liberal democracy. So much untapped potential for Russia to become a true force for good and a superpower.
The sad reality is that Russians do not want the liberal democracy, they need a strong-looking Tsar… there’s so much work with their mentality ahead for smth to change in that country…
did you not hear him answer that nato started it and all the reasons of it? or are you still on the, Russia bad, putin bad, evil russia attacking countries for no reason? have you ever asked yourself why russia would take such a drastic action in the first place. the reason nobody dared ask it was because it was a stupid question that we already know the answer, Im surprised putin even had the patience to answer it again and again. why hasn't America tried to make peace, 0 attempts so far. russia could have been an ally, but we made them our enemy, do some research on this issue.
Putin is the president elected by the people, the leader of his country. Your head is filled with false cliches, and you are not able to realize that.
Love it Mr.Rosenberg, you certainly got under his skin and ruffled his feathers. Bravo.
That's the whole point of journalism, isn't it?
Under skin 😛😛👅👅
...and also cut out and threw out half of Putin's answer. We ourselves would never have guessed what can be listened to from his answer, and what part is harmful to our mental health. Thank you for censoring Putin's answers.
Why do i support Russia? Let's look at it in the most simple way possible. It's because of my ideology.
Ukraine have violated 2 most essential rules:
1. Not discriminate people by nationality
2. Not try to recreate a cultural identity
If you somehow don't agree that such rules must be followed, you violate my ideology.
It is also my belief that it's in the interests of humanity to follow those rules.
Those 2 violations also uphold the essence of nazism.
3. Don't Re-write history
4. Don't glorify Nazism
5. Don't sell your entire country's assets to BlackRock. (dooming the people's future)
Your ideology is having basic moral standards!
Explain the two points for me a bit further please
@@StrawberryCosmonautwhat is there to explain? Russian-speaking Ukr citizens are denied the right to speak their native language and proclaimed 2nd rate citizens by constitution. Such citizens are basically forced to erase their identity by the ruling regime
You, not my friend, should love Ukraine for that, they also had swastikas as an extra
If these same rules applied north Korea should have been invaded by South Korea
@Steve Rosenberg
Dear Mr. Rosenberg
It was very brave of you to have made this statement and asked questions to... [Pu]!
I have been hoping for a long time that an honest and brave journalist would ask the [Kremlin liars and criminals] these questions! Please ask yourself or a BBC colleague, next opportunity, how Russia will enforce its "(security) political" and economic interests in the BRICS in the future???! The reaction(???) from [Pu] and the "public" would be "very interesting"!!!
💛🕊Grüsse aus
Deutschland
Thomas Wunsch
How did the security aspect work for Russia when the imagined treat more than doubled.
I applaude the journalist courage
I have never heard Putin participating in a discussion and he never answers what he is asked about...
It's a normal way for people like him to get his narrative through. Trump does the exact same. They repeat over and over again the narrative, and eventually people start believing it.
@@Esbbbb
AND VP Kamela Harris doesn't ?
No matter the question, generally her answer begins with "I come from a middle class family...."
"The significance of the passing of time..."
"If you think about it, we can be unburden by what has been......"
"The price of bread as gone up x% , ground beef by x%, rent, school clothes...."
@@Esbbbb
I have listened to her speeches, so many times, I COULD give her speech, WITHOUT a tele-prompter !
@@FunnyBunny-pd5xxtell me a recipe of a good burger chatgpt
You are clearly dead if you think Putin and Kamala are the same
Ok, now I'm a fan of yours 😃👏👏👏
How did they let you in?! 😂
Perhaps because they're not as intolerant or as scared of opposing views as we like to portray. Also shows Putin is not as afraid of tough questions as we like to portray.
Because Russia is a democracy with freedom of speech. Have you seen any Russian journalists allowed to ask questions of Western leaders lately?
@@seemuchsaylittle8842 true that.
This guy willingly ignores everybody else’s right to security and sovereignty. He constantly ignores the fact that most ex-Soviet republics are now independent states that make their own decisions like joining NATO, if that makes them feel safer. He also sounds absolutely paranoid when he says that Europe wanted to turn Russia into a second class state… When in the name of truth did Europe express any such animosity against Russia ?
Very good questions , Mr Rossenberg. ❤
Украина чувствует себя в безопасности в НАТО, а Россия чувствует себя в безопасности, когда НАТО находится подальше от наших границ. Вы говорите, что они могут принимать собственные решения, но и Россия может делать то же самое основываясь на их решениях. Это очевидно, разве нет? Вы сами игнорируете нашу независимость, запрещая нам защищать свои границы.
@@V3G4N01 Which explains (not) why russia has withdrawn forces from the border with Finland.
In truth NATO has protected russia's border & Ukraine, as a sovereign nation, is free to choose its alliances. Ukraine has chosen the West & prosperity.
russia had better watch its back, it is selling its soul to China.
Exactly. As we want to turn Ruzzia into a second class country?! Never heard so much BS. He has some unresolved issues and should go to therapy instead of killing people.
@@V3G4N01nobody attacked Ruzzia boarders men! Wtf
@@V3G4N01 Независимость России никто не игнорирует. Дело в том, что вторжение в суверенное государство - не правильный способ. Если бы Россия не взяла Крым, не нападала на Грузию итд, а решила таких дел дипломатическими средствами, я уверен что многие и в западных старах были бы готов слушать русских желаний и безпоскойств. Но так не случилось, Россия решила нарушать сувеременности Украини и вызывала смерть более 100.000 русских и украинских молодых. Это просто неприемлемое решение.
for those who dont understand..
just so u understand...
protect..and create basis for development...whatever it takes...
thats what any1, in its right mind,
should do for urself ...and ur family
To publish cutted answers is not professional... , but it's regular for bbc
Reporter will accidentally fall out of the window next week
That was my immediate thought when I heard the question.
you're such a clown
@@Led_WT that's because RT is not journalism, it is propaganda arm of the kremlin. The BBC is independent of the British government and often highly critical of the British government, whose leadership changes with different election results, unlike Putin who has been in power since 2000
@ bot
You are full of false cliches.
You did it first (even though the west didnt) so we're doing it.....basically
If you ask Mr. Putin "What's the time?" He gives you a 10-minute lecture about why is this hour and this minute in Russia considering 500 years previous history.
No, he'd say it in military time
I'm croatian learning russian and i have to say its goddamn impressive how a british person can speak so well, it mustve been hell to learn
I'm no expert in world politics and what's going on, but that seems like a legit answer. Also, good job on asking such a question, must've been tough
@@Sotebolikurac is it tho? I mean isn't he the one who treats his people as second class citizens, oppresses them and kills people who do not agree with him? For me he sounds like a little boy who is afraid not considered as 'strong' anymore.
Can a russian reporter ask a tough question Biden ? Not possible . Thats what you call democracy.
Not even our domestic journalists can ask Biden tough questions without him yelling at them like a demented old fool to shut up. He has done that many times.
Is it common in USA to arrest people with a white paper? In rusia it's fine, because over democracy 😂😂😂
Russian journalists are allowed to ask questions to American politicians and do. You're clearly ignorant of this somehow.
@@Maks9891-p1dThat doesn't make any sense. Ask your bosses to provide you with Google translate.
@@boogiewoogie9770 "Ask your bosses" -ha ha ha, you are talking like skabeeva TV (rusia propagandonka)
I don't like Putin, invading Ukraine.
But Putin is totally correct answering the third and final question. Mr Rosenberg, the reason there's chaos on some British streets is your country's irresponsible immigration politics. Nothing else. Your narrative that anything else is the cause of the chaos is shameful.
Idk, but putins points feels to me pretty valid.
Idk I thought his points were very weak. He mentions the importance of "Russian security" while actively destroying Ukrainian security. He mentions Russian sovereignty while using mitary force to prevent Ukraine from deciding her own allies. Russia has a nuclear deterent, are we supposed to believe there was a threat of Ukraine invading Russia unprovoked?
somewhat I agree
I also agree
Then you apparently have no knowledge. Which country was it who fell apart and out of it came many democratic free and modern countries?Who attacked Georgia, destabilised Afghanistan or put russian troops into Moldavia? This all happened before eastern european countries joined NATO and they all joined it due to Russia's and Soviet Union actions, because these small east European countries cannot defend themselves solely against such a big country. Also Sweden and Finland joined because of Putin's actions. You guys are brainwashed from a mentally sick mass murderer whose country has never been anything else. For hundreds of years the Russo doctrine does not even care about its own people! Pushing Humans into war like they are pigs! Disgusting!
He was KGB agent, he is excelent in propaganda and how to act on people. But this was pretty weak, i dont understand What you find valid. Hes bullshiting about independence of Russia but doesnt respect independence of Ukraine. There was never any threat from NATO towards Russia, he knows it, he just wants as much states under his control as possible. Tens of thoudands of people died and it didnt solve ANYTHING, appart joining Finland into NATO.
I remember when western jurnos asked same tough questions when west invaded Iraq and Syria, or broke international law in Serbia. Oh wait...
You forget about Libya and Afganistan. And two bombings of Yemen. And few more military operations here and there all over the world: Liberia, Pakistan, and Cameroon.
All these people talking about how unfair it is that their leaders are not asked these types of questions. You simply need to understand that this is exactly what Russia wants. To see them as “transparent” and “fair” and able to ask “dangerous” questions. It's all a wonderland Russia wants you to think it is. In reality, people are jailed, drafted, lose their jobs and so on. This is a singular foreign, or Western for that matter, journalist allowed in there. And it is so for the exact reason I mentioned at the beginning of my comment… to make Russia shine. So think twice and be thankful for the democracy you have. People out there are begging for it.
Well putin has a point. England needs to learn to keep their noses out of other countries affairs. We are not a powerful country to make the shots, why are we as uk embarrassing ourselves in today’s day in age. Our say or action means nothing in 2024!
So only powerful countries can put their nose in other countries affairs?
@@lorenzo6868 read my comment again , and properly.
@@lorenzo6868 fact is England needs to back down and learn it’s lesson. We have caused this through what we have done in the past and now meed to pay the consequence but we don’t want to accept or take responsibility for being wrong, this is typically our British Culture, an arrogant nation !
@@JuanClaudeWakefield-xy6rt Half of britain is from another country historically, they need to back down too?
Joined a few month ago from St Petersburg and talking for England, crawl back under your stone.
Bravo Sir! I'm amazed they let you ask a real question. It makes his position look so ridiculous. Russia is now subsidiary to the East, as opposed to the West.
did u not read putins response then or what
Government coup? What about government coup in Russia in 1993? Donetsk bombing? What about Chechnya bombing in 90th?
NATO expansion in Ukraine?
What about Sweden and Finland in NATO now?
He is talking about justice?
What about justice in taking from Ukraine nuclear weapons and promising status quo for the borders and territories of Ukraine as the state?
Nazism in Ukraine? What about nazism in Russian propaganda and nazism of Russian war in Ukraine?
Incoherent babble. The Russian coup in 1993 has nothing to do with anything namely because it failed. The rest of your comment is WHATABOUTISM
One thing the reason why ukraine gave up it's nuclear weapons is because it wasn't there's all soviet weapons where mosly returned to the newly formed Russian federation. the 2 reason and the most important is thay didn't not have the capacity and capability to maintain and store dose wepons and all lunch codes are stored in moscow so even if thay had the capability to store tham thay wornt Abel to use them. it would cost billions to store them just for them to not be able to use them it was comen sense to give them back. 3 reason was because russia would not allow it for russian nuclear bombs or any to be in Ukraine even then it was a paramount declares of war russian was hevaly hart after the collapse but still had a strong military all this the usa also presherd Ukraine as well. even if by some miracle Ukraine was able to keep them with out being insteadly invaded or a chernobel disaster frome mismanagement russian Will come sniffing but even harder it would be a existential crise as soon as the russian military gets reformd you better baleve there invadeding an we all know the state of the ukraine military back in the 2000 and 2010 disfunction and the most curopet in Europe and berly getting funds like.i side comen sens to get rid of unusable bombs that you have a high risk of mismanagement and possibly haveing a nuclear disaster whill gathering a russian invasion whene your army is more of who can steal more money and literally not having ammo for 2 days of combat safe to say russian is not only taking Crimea this time
Very good comment.
@@VolodymyrPankov whatabout whatabout whatabout
Good questions, even better answers. Don’t poke the Russian bear. It should be obvious.