Why US Aircraft Carriers DON'T PASS Through SOUTH CHINA SEA

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 408

  • @navyproductions
    @navyproductions  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Why do you think the main reason is that US aircraft carriers avoid the South China Sea? How do you think the tension in the South China Sea can be resolved? 👇

    • @davidcerullo7976
      @davidcerullo7976 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Our President Biden is senile, psycho, schizo and he has no credibility or courage and China knows it; thus, our military must be cowled into obedience. That's my take.

    • @JamesBrown-ux9ds
      @JamesBrown-ux9ds 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It could become resolved by making the entire pacific a 'wsfz - war ship free zone', US, China and Russia as well as France, New Seeland, Australia and some more would sign as well - 'japm - joint anti pirate missions' continue to become carried out, cost savings as peace dividends to the people.

    • @PrashantKumar-qp4er
      @PrashantKumar-qp4er 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Why American aircraft carriers don't sail through the South China Sea? The same reason that the American aircraft carriers don't sail near India, Russia, North Korea, or Iran. Because these violent American THUGS are scared. These American aircraft carriers can only be used to BULLY small weak defenceless countries and not powerful countries such as China, India, Russia, North Korea, and Iran.

    • @firdausidris6367
      @firdausidris6367 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China Hypersonic Missiles

    • @Fransky-p2g
      @Fransky-p2g 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Kelegaan dalam segala hal tunggu aku nanti oke : Franki Pran 👑 Pollpran:

  • @josephmumma6997
    @josephmumma6997 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    The USS Ronald Reagan carrier strike group is in the South China Sea right now.

    • @seangaun
      @seangaun 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nothing to strike dude. The terrorists will strike it

    • @jesuslucero233
      @jesuslucero233 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      this blogger is lying better to block this blogger ahahha

    • @totzinfo
      @totzinfo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you're lying, do you believe your own lies? even the US Defense Department and Pentagon already told the world that they cannot able to pass South China Sea, they could not afford to sacrifice their entire fleet to be melted down by Chinese armament

    • @totzinfo
      @totzinfo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      US ships couldn't pass 9 Chinese permanent military bases and facilities islands in South China Sea with full battle gear and arsenals of anti aircraft, anti ship and anti submarine hypersonic missiles, much more Chinese radar can detect US stealth ships, submarines and aircrafts, could US sacrifices their fleet of naval air forces forces to pass South China Sea?

    • @Ron-u1z
      @Ron-u1z 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Slant eyes

  • @priyacharichakravarti8716
    @priyacharichakravarti8716 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    A friend of mine, was among thousands of folks from Taiwan who took a tour of the USS Ronald Reagan last year when it was on a good will stop at Kaoshiung, which is on the South China Sea. So I don't know what type of person made this up?

    • @renecruz6967
      @renecruz6967 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      A Chinese propagandist as usual what else is new ha ha ha

    • @MelquiadesSubito-jn1be
      @MelquiadesSubito-jn1be 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      God blesss & take care ALL​@@renecruz6967

    • @priyacharichakravarti8716
      @priyacharichakravarti8716 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@renecruz6967 Absolutely!

    • @JohnDahne
      @JohnDahne 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Y

  • @sirwholland7
    @sirwholland7 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Your thesis is off, the Navy conducts “freedom of Navigation” exercises in international waters all the time. Carrier Battle Groups and Amphibious Strike Groups transit the Taiwan Straits and SCS regularly.

    • @hkfoo3333
      @hkfoo3333 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is why China has decided to take over the SCS and now these carriers are just good sitting ducks in these areas.

  • @dustybluemoon
    @dustybluemoon 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    A huge number of american war vehicles are in philippine edca sites. How did it reach philippines without passing thru scs

    • @ronniesolomon9625
      @ronniesolomon9625 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He meant not using carriers

  • @vesterb2373
    @vesterb2373 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Back in 1988, I got sea sick for an entire week on the U.S.S Carl Vinson CVN 70 when went thru the south china seas while a hurricane or a cyclone or whatever they call it there. While not wanting to throw up and just feel better, it would not have helped anyways. It was during this transit where I actually saw a 100 ft high wave stop us hard in a deep trough. It made our anchor lift up and slam against the ship so hard I thought it went thru the side but it did not. We had to hang a string with a nut on it to orient how the room was tilting. That helped a lot

  • @adamdeguzman3081
    @adamdeguzman3081 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    thats why US put 9 bases in the philippines

    • @scruffy7443
      @scruffy7443 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      People in the Philippines are worried about Prostitution might flourish once again with the U.S Bases there, lots of lonely horny sailors and military personnel (mostly men) might get the ugly flat nose pinays pregnant and those men might leave the country out of wedlock, leaving the babies to be born bastards!😿

    • @hkfoo3333
      @hkfoo3333 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What can the bases in PH do other than being destroyed in the first hours of conflick. Even if they are not what use are they? air base cannot fly planes for sure. Send soldiers vs China? Are you all jokers?

    • @ferdinandmalabed2197
      @ferdinandmalabed2197 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      US did not put bases rather Philippines bases allowing them to use for rotational deployment

  • @Marconius-SPQR
    @Marconius-SPQR 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The stench of bullsith is strong in this one young Padawan. Cautious be you when watching !!

  • @SamWhodat-vh5fl
    @SamWhodat-vh5fl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Not true the Seventh fleet does patrol the South China Sea.I know I was there.

  • @JacksonWong-pw4zq
    @JacksonWong-pw4zq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All countries should practice freedom of navigation into usa waters like the way usa did in other countries waters .

  • @alexskinner7511
    @alexskinner7511 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Family member on a carrier has visited Phillipines,Singapore, Thailand. How can you explain they get from the first to the second to the third without transiting through the south china sea? Your thesis is wrong!

    • @PrashantKumar-qp4er
      @PrashantKumar-qp4er 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why American aircraft carriers don't sail through the South China Sea? The same reason that the American aircraft carriers don't sail near India, Russia, North Korea, or Iran. Because these violent American THUGS are scared. These American aircraft carriers can only be used to BULLY small weak defenceless countries and not powerful countries such as China, India, Russia, North Korea, and Iran.

  • @jubzl8592
    @jubzl8592 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I guess when they docked in Manila they used their teleportation device 😅😅😅.
    West Philippine Sea is ours. 9 dash line my ass.

  • @fclred59
    @fclred59 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    yes the us needs to support it friends

  • @Hendramail2000
    @Hendramail2000 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good post

  • @kennethdurham4646
    @kennethdurham4646 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think it's all about us hegemony.

  • @timothyhannon605
    @timothyhannon605 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    But they do from time to time.

  • @byronharano2391
    @byronharano2391 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Ah...we collided with a Russian Victor Class SSN in the South China Sea. What you talking about?

  • @LeeSkJohn-sv8wi
    @LeeSkJohn-sv8wi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    USA used to but now china had hypersonic missiles that can easily sink USA carrier

    • @mickeyd8476
      @mickeyd8476 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Let the Chinese try.

    • @LeeSkJohn-sv8wi
      @LeeSkJohn-sv8wi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mickeyd8476 first USA must have the balls to attack china defending their scs.

    • @choolikyoon9939
      @choolikyoon9939 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      China is more afraid of young Americans who are willing to study hard in maths, science, engineering and technology. Strategic planning, journalism, international law and insurance salesmanship will not hurt them. 😊

    • @LeeSkJohn-sv8wi
      @LeeSkJohn-sv8wi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mickeyd8476 china do not need to try because USA carrier will not come within the hypersonic missiles range unless for innocent passage and military excercise.

  • @MacXcode
    @MacXcode 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +84

    This video is full of "CRAPS"! US Aircraft Carriers pass through the "So-Called" south china sea all the times! I"m from Vietnam and I know for a fact that America carriers often sail throughj all the time! This is a Chinese "Propaganda" video!

    • @jaclrossrick6327
      @jaclrossrick6327 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cool story, pedophile. Can't cut it in america?

    • @dr.fernandoarevalo82719
      @dr.fernandoarevalo82719 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Exactly brother!
      I'm from the Philippines, we have them all the time!

    • @samhy
      @samhy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then, call the USA Joe Biden sail the USA aircraft carriers into the first island chains NOW, if China Xi warned the USA Joe Biden.🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @samhy
      @samhy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You vietnamese NO need to Complaints China, and go ahead call the US Joe Biden administration sail the US aircraft carrier into the first island, if Xi chair person warned the USA adninistration Joe Biden NOT to Cross the red lines exactly like in the Korea war and Sino-India war.💪💪💪💪💪💪

    • @samhy
      @samhy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Strategically speaking Việtnam doesn't like China well under control of all of the first island chains and the South China sea by China now, sorry Vietnam China PLA's arm force today is solid with well under control entirely of the first island chains NOW, if war breakout with the USA.💪💪💪💪💪💪

  • @duanerice-mason2115
    @duanerice-mason2115 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    THAT IT WHY THE US NAVY HAD A BASE AT SUBIC BAY FOR ALMOST 100 YEARS😅

  • @homomorphic
    @homomorphic 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    We shouldn't be the irritant in the relationship, but when China conducts grayzone operations against our defence pact partner, then every time they do that we should sail a carrier through. If China continues grayzone ops against our defence pact partners, then they are saying that they enjoy having our carriers sail through, since they are free to stop that anytime they want simply by ceasing their aggressive behavior.

  • @JanielleHillside
    @JanielleHillside 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What!? What news agency are available at your place? My God🤔🤭

  • @PaulXiong-q4r
    @PaulXiong-q4r 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Don’t be afraid. In my opinion just declar us and china war?

  • @JoyVillamera
    @JoyVillamera 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    yes more and more

  • @jeffi854
    @jeffi854 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It really doesn’t matter all that much anymore because when you have an incompetent administration/ president combined with a DEI ran military like we have today it doesn’t matter. Our recruitment numbers are at its lowest since before World War Two and soldiers today are getting out just as soon as their commitments up because soldiers simply don’t want to fight in a DEI ran military. And trust me NATO isn’t what it once used to be and what they do have amounts to a bunch of soy boys who would surrender at the sound of the first round going off. Americas once proud and very effective fighting force isn’t even remotely close to being as great as all the guys we had fighting during the gulf war along with our outstanding officers and Generals like Bradley and Schwartzkopf ! Today America doesn’t have a General who command a military force like the one we had during the gulf war. And the pentagon already knows that they cannot fight on a multi front war because we don’t have the equipment or soldiers needed to operate them. Just last week I watched a press conference with Vladimir Putin and Chinese Prime Minister Xi announcing to the world that they had combined their military forces with North Korea and Iran, and how they plan on using that combined force to overtake all of Ukraine, Taiwan and attack the US mainland. Putin even wanted to thank Biden for leaving the border open for 3 1/2 years, so China could smuggle in over 30,000 soldiers into the interior of the United States to attack our infrastructure and who were awaiting orders.

    • @glenndavidtorres
      @glenndavidtorres 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Another Chinese Troll talking, LOL! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
      Did you actually DODGE the DRAFT, then?
      Smuggle 30,000 soldiers? My FOOT! Look at Ukraine, it is now inside Russia. Where's your Putin? Why wasn't he helped by Xi and Un?
      Maybe you should, you're a Chinese martyr, you SIOMAI, LOL! 😂😂😂😂

  • @IdeasForSuccess
    @IdeasForSuccess 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    They DO pass through the South China Sea!

  • @idrismohd1501
    @idrismohd1501 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Only flexing muscles nothing else.

  • @mariaryan-q7t
    @mariaryan-q7t 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the U.S. should be cautious & protective over their assets & reputations

  • @beingdavidwatts2024
    @beingdavidwatts2024 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why is a ship flying the Chinese flag and the American Flag? What does that mean? 7:18 minutes into the video I saw a ship showing both flags

  • @glenndavidtorres
    @glenndavidtorres 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hate to tell you this, but carriers have been cruising the South China Sea through Subic Bay, as I can remember. I'm a witness to this, twice. Once with USS Kitty Hawk in the 80s and in the early 2000, USS Essex. Stupidity that gets paid is your business. But it doesn't cut it.

  • @rebelthreefiftyseven6739
    @rebelthreefiftyseven6739 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    dude this is not true. they have been in the SCS

  • @kimocoloma4123
    @kimocoloma4123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    U.S. has 11 Aircraft carriers. I'm sure they have a few in the Pacific Ocean

  • @MoisesmackCabillar
    @MoisesmackCabillar 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "GOD" knows who is the right one to dominate

  • @WinkainyserKaiser
    @WinkainyserKaiser 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Put oneself into the other shoes to feel and decide what'a in it for you and the entire world. Are we here or there to make peaceful exchange for mutual benefits or otherwise. Mistakes reoccurring when one ignores the lessons learned from history and human natures. Should one felt insecured to create unnecessary misunderstanding would definitely pay the price for whatever decision made. There's a Chinese saying,"Don't do what you don't want to others".

  • @russelarondelvalle3124
    @russelarondelvalle3124 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Huwag pasisindak mga PCG, NAVY, protektahan ang mga mangingisda para hindi maharas sa WPS, China magumpisa ng kaguluhan, labanan, ang mamatay ng dahil sa yo, God Bless all there in WPS

  • @thomasstuart6861
    @thomasstuart6861 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    All these things were discussed and agreed to, in the Law of the Sea Convention. Maybe your video should be in Chinese language.

  • @glicerioumali941
    @glicerioumali941 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am 22 years innaval service. I have 3 deployment on board aircraft carriers in 7 fleet during Vietnam war. We sail to Hongkong, Australia, Japan, Olongapo, and Indian ocean. There is no restriction to sail anywhere. We are in Kenya during Entebbe operation of Israel in Uganda. We passed through Malacca Strait many times. No problem.
    US carriers visited Perth Australia many times passing through Malacca Strait.
    Chinese PLA military are just used for propaganda purposes. They are just bully. They can not handle Hongkong, Taiwan, Japan, Indonesia and India!!😮😮😮

  • @tbolt2948
    @tbolt2948 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    We don't need CVNs there. We already have several unsinkable carriers there, namely Japan, the P.I. Guam, Tinian, Australia and possibly, I can't believe I'm saying this, Vietnam.

    • @RodneyDempsey-o8w
      @RodneyDempsey-o8w 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We do not have carriers in P.I., guam or Australia.

    • @tbolt2948
      @tbolt2948 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@RodneyDempsey-o8w No, they are the carriers, as in you can't sink them, they are islands in the battle area that supports the fighters, bombers and helos that would need a CVN otherwise.

    • @RodneyDempsey-o8w
      @RodneyDempsey-o8w 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@tbolt2948 we do not have bases in p.I or Australia. Carriers support their own air wings. The fact is the navy operates in the south China sea it is international waters.

    • @user-ku2rb
      @user-ku2rb 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      bwahaha do you think that just because "you can't sink them" that they are invincible?? lol Did it ever occur to you that when those runways are targeted by missiles and bombs and made inoperable and unusable, then you have no more support for the fighters, bombers and helos that you are boasting about??

    • @jimfrank8250
      @jimfrank8250 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ⁠@@RodneyDempsey-o8wyes the US does in fact have bases in both the PI and Australia. Since the invasion of Ukraine the Australasian area has been increasingly worried about China and Russia. Therefore the US has deployed naval assets to these countries and developing bases and ports to accommodate their assets, including but not limited to subs. Even Japan has significantly and continuously upgraded their military forces along with Australia ordering US made nuclear submarines.

  • @victorcold46
    @victorcold46 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Roosevelt was there on the 10 of june

  • @thegreatasia3828
    @thegreatasia3828 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your wrong, so many time aircraft carrier pass in south china sea., your under china payroll

  • @falvegas511
    @falvegas511 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    THAT'S NEWS TO ME---WHAT IN THEE HELL IS THERE TO STOP US CARRIERS PASSING THROUGH FREE WATERS? AND, WHO WOULD EVER WANT TO DARE, STOP THEM?

  • @Me2Lancer
    @Me2Lancer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Apparently, conditions in the South China Sea have changed since my ship patrolled the coast of Vietnam in 1965. At that time the US had ships on station in the Tonkin Gulf north of Danang. Carrier aircraft struck ground targets in North Vietnam.

    • @markcollins2666
      @markcollins2666 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Living in the Philippines, incidents in the South China Sea, between China and you name them, are on the TV news nightly. China sincerely believes it owns the SCS. A US CVN there would go way beyond the tipping point, it would be irresistible for the Chinese to provoke it.

    • @tbolt2948
      @tbolt2948 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Recently a CVN made a Port Call at Da Nang for the first time since the end of the war.

    • @markcollins2666
      @markcollins2666 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tbolt2948, it's easy to approach Vietnam from the south, without entering the SCS proper, just skirting on its western edge.

  • @davidjagan2794
    @davidjagan2794 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just go through freely navigation defend on International Law for keeping peace and sovereignty.

  • @reneevasco-yu8os
    @reneevasco-yu8os 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That is absolutely correct China's propaganda. During the time of former president Trump, two u.s. aircraft carriers together with their escorts pass through south china sea unimpeded. U.S. warships including their carriers regularly pass through Taiwan strait again unimpeded. Why not scs?

  • @alegandroluna8667
    @alegandroluna8667 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    China, Russia, Iran Bad guys
    Anglo-saxons good guys
    super heroes 😂 classic Hollywood scrips

  • @CrochetIsLife54
    @CrochetIsLife54 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I would imagine that a US carrier group is as welcome in the South China Sea as an equivalent Chinese naval force would be in the Gulf of Mexico.
    That doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen.

  • @JonathanDickson-w2g
    @JonathanDickson-w2g 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Let them have it

  • @demented8431
    @demented8431 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The West Philippine Sea has many shallows, reefs and rocks. There is not sea room for large carrier groups to maneuver.

  • @ballumgthreth7412
    @ballumgthreth7412 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    In fact, it is not that complicated. We can think about it from another angle: the Gulf of Mexico is one of the most strategically important regions in the world, but Chinese aircraft carriers have not appeared in the waters. Have you ever thought about why? Why is China unwilling to send a large number of reconnaissance aircraft and warships to freely sail in the Gulf of Mexico?

    • @haiwang2857
      @haiwang2857 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      中国真的爱好和平,最近40年,中国没有发动过任何战争。而同时期,美国几乎每年都发动或者参与战争。

    • @nuckingfuts9515
      @nuckingfuts9515 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Simple, Chinese doesn't have a blue water navy, incapable of operating for an extended period of time far from their home base.

    • @EdithaCaparoso
      @EdithaCaparoso 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Simple!... Because China can only bully small countries near to there Country.

  • @pmannnn4
    @pmannnn4 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I THINK HE STAYING GO THOUGH THE STRAIT WITH A CARRIER 😮

  • @ApinderSingh-b2c
    @ApinderSingh-b2c 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is the ground every body must enjoy the show it will take times then you fell it your self how much difficult to play far far far away especially if you are your own thats why they created Japan Australia united states India good news china Russia together im not in the politics im fan

  • @angelgrant7062
    @angelgrant7062 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Of course they do. Theo often travel between Japan and Singapore.

  • @TurboImpaler
    @TurboImpaler 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    i think it's because they are allergic to shovels going mach 10+

    • @PrashantKumar-qp4er
      @PrashantKumar-qp4er 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why American aircraft carriers don't sail through the South China Sea? The same reason that the American aircraft carriers don't sail near India, Russia, North Korea, or Iran. Because these violent American THUGS are scared. These American aircraft carriers can only be used to BULLY small weak defenceless countries and not powerful countries such as China, India, Russia, North Korea, and Iran.

    • @pogo1140
      @pogo1140 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The US Navy found that they can shoot down satellites using any of their Burke class destroyers. They also found they can hit a Mach 10 missile with a Mach 4 dart.

    • @TurboImpaler
      @TurboImpaler 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@pogo1140 sure thing, and then you woke up right? 🤣🤣

    • @pogo1140
      @pogo1140 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @opfor8465 2008 Tico class USS Lake Erie, with the Aegis combat system, launched a modified SM-3 and shot down a US satellite.
      Guess what the Arleigh Burke class destroyers have. A more advanced Aegis Combat System and the SM-3 missile, which the Navy recently used to intercept Iranian ballistic missiles.

  • @willeisinga2089
    @willeisinga2089 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Carriers are vulnerable. Big Slow Easy Targets. 5000 Crew Inside. They Sink Crew Inside. 😂😂😂😢

  • @sergiopalomo1671
    @sergiopalomo1671 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Because the US 7th fleet is not there anymore!

  • @MQ1983A
    @MQ1983A 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hello

  • @neiljanverga2875
    @neiljanverga2875 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Aircraft carrier Visited Philippines. What do you think? Aircraft carrier can fly?

  • @ratuadilFF
    @ratuadilFF 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Tidak ada permusuhan mutlak dengan keluarga jepang, cina, dan korea, bbrp dari mereka tim ku,, dalam urusan keluarga, bisnis dan edukasi

  • @seangaun
    @seangaun 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    China should also send their warships to Cuba like Russia

    • @stephen7701
      @stephen7701 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They might break down going that far 🤣

  • @willeisinga2089
    @willeisinga2089 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They Better Stay near US Coastal border. Near LA, SF Bay Area, Seattle. Leave SCS for the Chinese. Support China ❤.

  • @noelbinayas1730
    @noelbinayas1730 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Who are you talking for anyway?

  • @djsapien3448
    @djsapien3448 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The US would completely freak out and declare war if a Chinese aircraft carrier sailed through the Gulf of Mexico 😂

    • @reynaldoflores4522
      @reynaldoflores4522 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But the Chinese wouldn't do that because they're too scared of the Americans.

  • @TagAttack-k4b
    @TagAttack-k4b 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I reside here in the PHILIPPINES (Nakatira ako dito sa Pilipinas) US Carrier CARL VINSON just visited last January. I am not sure what this video is

    • @ssarsi
      @ssarsi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Gago itong channel na to eh. Na hack siguro ng chinese itong youtube channel. Hahahaha

  • @PierisaulBanzon
    @PierisaulBanzon 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    this is a pro China blog

  • @napoleoncanio4996
    @napoleoncanio4996 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    US started operating again in South China Sea starting in 2017. They stop operating after the Vietnam war. When Vietnam ended, US Carriers navigated in China Sea for good will visits to countries like Vietnam, Philippines, and Singapore. In fact 3 carriers are deployed in the region operating in INDOPACIFIC since 2017. They are in and out of China sea. Operating in any region on earth is a script written by policy makers 10 to 20 years of ago. Note: OPERATIONS, They are arm to their teeth as part of their readiness. Ready for combat 24/7.

  • @mariaryan-q7t
    @mariaryan-q7t 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the U.S. need not to prove anything to anybody - they know who they are. they need to gather supporters & FRIENDS TO BE ON THEIR SIDE

  • @PabloJr.Cotaoco
    @PabloJr.Cotaoco 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about build up military by China in Atlantic Ocean near America mainland?

  • @MoisesmackCabillar
    @MoisesmackCabillar 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Don't panic of what you have seen in scene

  • @FranzBieberkopf
    @FranzBieberkopf 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is rubbish.
    The US Navy (and French and British and German) regularly have freedom of navigation exercises in and through the S. China Sea

  • @AndrewR10001
    @AndrewR10001 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You are giving false information... U.S carriers with their battle group occassionally pass in south china sea

  • @CrochetIsLife54
    @CrochetIsLife54 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Building man-made islands a) in an area frequented by typhoons/cyclones and b) in a time of sea level rise seems to be an expensive boondoggle to me. Simply supplying these militarily installations with fresh drinking water is no small task.
    The rest of their logistics can’t be much better. Will China bankrupt itself with such unnecessary wastes of manpower and resources?

    • @patcee4008
      @patcee4008 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China wants to control the Waters around those man-made [fly-speck] islands. They want to be able to exclusively claim the mineral rights [oil, natural gas, drilling], as well as the fishing rights. China is claiming that each new island they create [from what used to be a shoal or a reef that had previously been in international waters], gives them an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) 400 Nautical miles in diameter which they'll own in perpetuity. Even after those islands have been totally obliterated in a military action, or typhoon, China will still own the the watery acreage surrounding the defunct "island".

    • @CrochetIsLife54
      @CrochetIsLife54 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@patcee4008 Will this start a land grab with other countries staking similar claims? I am surprised that this is even legal.

    • @choolikyoon9939
      @choolikyoon9939 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Building islands is very very cheap and effective in somewhere nearby.😊

  • @zzzzzsleeping
    @zzzzzsleeping 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Kinda shallow of all the things you said.
    Avoid escalation?
    How can you assert the freedom of navigation if you are avoiding the sea lane you want to be free for all?
    Since 2022 to 2024, a bunch of aircraft carriers went to the Subic bay Philippines.
    They been seen in the South China sea a dozens of times.

  • @bebot1603
    @bebot1603 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thats crap. US aircraft carriers visit Manila and Subic Bay regularly. And the only way there is through the South China sea

  • @breakwhiskey2863
    @breakwhiskey2863 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    NOT TRUE.
    U.S.A. Carriers sails all the time and mocks china's 10 dash lines at SCS. Xi Jinping is so AFRAID to confront the carriers.😂😂😂😂😂😂
    From the Philippines.

  • @thomasferrari6465
    @thomasferrari6465 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A partly right, but driving something like that through there is just a sitting duck.Come on, be honest.
    You don't put those big assets in the situation.They don't even like taking a destroyer through there

    • @Pappy7064
      @Pappy7064 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You mean sitting ducks like putting Carriers in the Persian Gulf or the Gulf of Aden, small cramped operating areas with lots of ship traffic? Or the Sea of Japan with 3 Carrier Battle Groups at the same time? Carriers and their Battle Groups can operate and do operate wherever they are needed and they aren't by any definition sitting ducks. I know, I've been there. 7 years on USS Carl Vinson multiple deployments to several "hot spots".

    • @roderickcampbell2105
      @roderickcampbell2105 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That is the point Thomas. You put the big asset there to send a signal. Do anything to threaten this vessel and you will likely have started WWIII. USN can sail under well understood and written law of the sea. It should do so.

  • @robertwolfe8680
    @robertwolfe8680 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We should go on any ocean.

  • @DenisErmolaeva
    @DenisErmolaeva 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    hello

  • @alfredonagano7042
    @alfredonagano7042 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This video is a chinese propaganda

  • @colinburgess9455
    @colinburgess9455 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The USA has plenty of military bases in the proximity of the China sea, and doesn’t really need to permanently deploy aircraft carriers in that area, although they often visit. China can’t afford too much trouble with the US military because sanctions could cripple China’s economy overnight.

  • @gms1958
    @gms1958 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    US Navy presence is a necessity to assure freeedom of internatonal waters' trade, routes, and sailing in general. Withdrawl only causes the emobdment of our enamies. We don't like bullying!

  • @smallking4967
    @smallking4967 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    obvious false propaganda. and the US dash lines encompassing the pacific islands from the continental US, no other aircraft carrier is also passing there except the US?

  • @totzinfo
    @totzinfo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    US ships couldn't pass 9 Chinese permanent military base and facilities islands with full battle gear and arsenals of anti aircraft, anti ship and anti submarine hypersonic missiles, much more Chinese radar can detect US stealth ships, submarines and aircrafts, could US sacrifices their fleet of naval air forces forces to pass South China Sea?

  • @莽少-c4p
    @莽少-c4p 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    怕了😂

  • @organizer14
    @organizer14 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    US should not waste American people’s limited resources in foreign wars causing most Americans the inability to pay bills for basic necessities and causing US deficit and economic collapse. US needs to stop wasting the money of American people. We don’t want US to interfere with Chin a because there is no way US will win. Sone wars like Vietnam war should have already taught US military industrial complex that lesson. US will cause assured mutual catastrophe and destruction. It is educational for Russia to put nuclear missiles near. Cuba to help US neocons understand how it feels to China to allow hostile power in its backyard.

  • @frederickhalljr8947
    @frederickhalljr8947 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If China perceives it as provocation oh well too bad

    • @rickace132
      @rickace132 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China will just do the same. Build a base in Cuba. Russia is already in the Caribbeans right now.

  • @PongsEtras
    @PongsEtras 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its west phil sea no south china sea

    • @reynaldoflores4522
      @reynaldoflores4522 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The WPS is only that part of the whole SCS which is within the Philippines EEZ !😊

  • @earthwizz
    @earthwizz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    They run the risk of being sunk. More to the point, what is the US interest in the SCS beyond the, ultimately fruitless, containment of China? The SCS is vital to Chinese trade, there's no way they're going to allow anyone else to control it, particularly not a beligerant adversary like the USA.

    • @JimmieBrown-sg8fq
      @JimmieBrown-sg8fq 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      What would happen if CCP attacked a US carrier, heaven, help them talking B2s, B1s, Subs and who knows what else. When last time CCP fought a war, they having hell of a time finding military personnel, one of the reasons their ships sit in ports.

    • @pogo1140
      @pogo1140 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The same area is vital to the Philippines, Vietnam and every other nation in that area.
      And yes the US Navy routinely sails carriers with their battle group though the South China seas. They've been doing it since WW2 and continue to do it today and in the future

    • @RodneyDempsey-o8w
      @RodneyDempsey-o8w 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@blackmamba4965that is crazy the US Navy does not ask permission to transit international waters. I do not know where you come up with such nonsense.

    • @rickace132
      @rickace132 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JimmieBrown-sg8fq When was the last time the US fought a modern military? US has not fought a country with a Navy or Air force since WW2. They have no experience in modern warfare.

    • @gmonynegro595
      @gmonynegro595 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rickace132 And china does? You are a moron.

  • @oneastrails
    @oneastrails 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You are so full of crap, right at this moment the Nimitz is leading a multinational task force of ships in the South China sea, including a Canadian frigate, the HMCS Montreal that my good friend is aboard as head of the helo maintenance detachment.

  • @rodcabas
    @rodcabas 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeou are wrong Uss Theeodore Roosevelt pass through that area this month.

  • @miclimkl
    @miclimkl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What an excuse. The Carrier Ford is so afraid they will be sunk by the Houthi that they retreated fom the Red Sea.

  • @RodneyDempsey-o8w
    @RodneyDempsey-o8w 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Carrier's transit the south china sea how do you think west coast battle groups get to the Indian ocean and persian gulf.

    • @Pappy7064
      @Pappy7064 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      This is correct. I served onboard the USS Carl Vinson, and we operated in the South China Sea several times. There have been times when two Aircraft Carrier Battle Groups were operating together in the South China Sea. So I'm not sure what this video is talking about.

    • @RodneyDempsey-o8w
      @RodneyDempsey-o8w 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Pappy7064 I spent 14 years out of my 20 years in in westpac they transit south China sea all the time I spent a lot time in the south China sea. Your right this video has some wrong info one person made a comment there are carriers in pi, guam and Australia.

    • @markcollins2666
      @markcollins2666 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They take the long way. They don't absolutely HAVE to transit the SCS. It's just not worth it.

    • @Pappy7064
      @Pappy7064 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@markcollins2666 Wrong. The South China Sea does not belong to China it is International waters. The Navy operates through there all the time including Aircraft Carrier battle groups.

    • @RodneyDempsey-o8w
      @RodneyDempsey-o8w 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@markcollins2666 you are wrong for one it would take to long also cost to much. The U.S navy is there to keep the flow of all ships open in the south China sea. Are you or have you even been in tye navy?

  • @bobbygomez7095
    @bobbygomez7095 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😂😂 actually they come and go in South China sea then dock here in Philippines

  • @MichaelM-q2q
    @MichaelM-q2q 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Complete crap.

  • @michaelbhart8035
    @michaelbhart8035 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes

  • @ongchinlam4631
    @ongchinlam4631 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Let me say. If United states Lost 2 aircraft carrier. in the region 9:44 Japan will seek revenge against America. Okay

    • @jtm0071
      @jtm0071 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What the hell are you talking about? Write a coherent sentence.

  • @chasingsunset9801
    @chasingsunset9801 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They passed...and get stalked by CCG,and all it takes is one wrong move from china to create a war of mouths 😂

  • @jecs2123
    @jecs2123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The West Philippines sea!

  • @jamesgarcia7635
    @jamesgarcia7635 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That is not south china sea they are too far in west Philadelphia sea..

  • @precioushidalgo124
    @precioushidalgo124 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The word south china sea is a bad bad bad word to reveal it is philippine sea ...

  • @theEVILone0130
    @theEVILone0130 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We base them in Japan which is right there so we send them there. And we are in the process of setting up shop in the Philippines once again. China would be stupid to attack much less interfere with the carrier.