Mehdi is a joke. He got paid to downplay the lab leak theory. Ignored all the evidence. And now, covid 19 patients zero in Wuhan identified - Forbes Also, Vanity Fair, NIH admits to funding risky virus research in Wuhan.
Just goes to prove, u can pick and choose your facts in a debate on any issue. Morality, decency, being humane... need to factor. Intelligence and facts can go either way.
state interests are amoral but they need to frame that for the peasants to keep funding their wars. And ofc, the peasents believe they are exercising their free right to vote but are fully conditioned to respond like they want it. It is always us against them (them changes from time to time ).
No. You can get your arguments for/against the topic. But it doesn't mean your arguments are correct and hold the position. The argument is won by the one who counters opposite arguments and puts forward his compelling strong arguments with consistency.
@@shroudedgrove4679 Rape? Source: th-cam.com/video/aw2u8lOHhas/w-d-xo.htmlsi=TIPcmPXezXHCLPFr Incest? Source: th-cam.com/video/MVOvLe3MjwA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=g6TYG7Jl6seyZVpD Notice how he says it’s a clever devise to use 2 sisters rather than say an 80 year old great grandfather and a 18 year old great granddaughter? It’s because one is easier to accept to the masses and so the question flies under the radar.
What a fraud. - Trump is the only President not to start a false war to please the war-profiteers and deep state true fascists. - Trump is the President talking about closing the border from illegals stealing MILLIONS pf jobs from the American poor...and as the Black unemployment is almost DOUBLE the national average. - Trump helped to make America oil independent. Biden is now begging dictators for production he squashed in America. Is Hasan really this stupid???....YES he is. He's the same goof who said..."Non-Muslims live like animals" and "Mohammed flew to heaven on a winged horse".
This foolishness hasan is the same Guy who in the U.K. London tought Muslim extremism and homosexual homophobia lost his audience now in the U.S. trying to be funny journalist 🙄😆🔩🔩🔩
This hypocritical Hinduphobic White Collar Jihadi, Mehdi Hassan, who lectures non Islamic countries on democracy and human values was an ex-employee of Aljazeera, a mouth piece of the autocratic Qatar government, a country in which there are no religious minority rights, women's rights or LGBTQ rights Mehdi Hassan also spreads the propaganda of the 'peaceful' religion which spread 'peaceful' bomb blasts and other acts of violence all over the world including the most recent attack on Salman Rushdie in NewYork. Now he has penetrated the American media space to further spread 'peace' in the garb of a left of center journalist. He talks for minorities in America while being conspicuously silent about the millions being tortured or persecuted for blasphemy in the muslim world. And the irony is all this while, this political islamic pawn has not grown balls to say a word against China, which is peacefully torturing innocent Uighur muslims :D
Most stupid people always win arguments. Most intelligent people know when to be progressive and when to withdraw and listen. Now which category is Mehdi? 😂
Although Mehdi Hassan wasnt giving it his best he wasnt serious but he did do well over here. Good for him, Id much rather see him debate with seriousness
@@md.morshedyaqub3490 he's pointing them out himself, that's the whole lesson he gives here, how to "win any argument" using just retorics, I'm not complaining against anything, I think Mehdi would agree with this point, that the technique he demonstrates here, it's useful in this debate scape, i just think it's a very weak attitude
@@kobikaicalev175 While it may be tempting to label Mehid Hasan's arguments as "strawmaning" and "weak," such a characterization oversimplifies the nuances of his discourse. It is essential to engage with his points critically and assess the validity of his claims rather than dismissing them based solely on perceived tone or presentation style. 1. **Understanding Context:** Arguably, Hasan’s approach may be a reflection of the broader social or political context in which he operates. The tone perceived as "gleeful" could be interpreted as a rhetorical strategy aimed at highlighting contradictions or weaknesses in opposing viewpoints. This could encourage a more engaged discussion rather than stifling it through a serious or somber demeanor. 2. **Addressing Arguments Directly:** Rather than focusing on the perceived weakness of his arguments, one could analyze the specific claims he makes. Engaging with the content allows for a deeper understanding of his perspective and potentially exposes the strengths in his arguments, which may not be immediately apparent. 3. **The Importance of Rhetorical Strategies:** Rhetoric often plays a crucial role in shaping discourse. While some may find Hasan's tone objectionable, it may resonate with certain audiences, making complex ideas more accessible. Dismissing his arguments outright ignores the potential value of rhetorical diversity in public debate. 4. **Challenging the Assumption of Weakness:** The assertion that "nobody would quote here" his arguments may not hold up under scrutiny. Different audiences engage with content in varied ways, and the appeal of Hasan's arguments could vary significantly based on individual perspectives and experiences. In conclusion, while one may critique Hasan's rhetoric, it is crucial to engage with his arguments substantively rather than reducing them to simplistic categorizations. A more constructive approach would involve addressing the specifics of his claims and considering their broader implications within the discourse.
I used to like this guy then I started disliking him. But I always respected him. I personally feel he has lost a lot of arguements on his own head to head show. But here he was brilliant
@@burgermind802 Turns out that his hit on Matt was based largely on misinformation...also he didn't actually address the core tenet of the Twitter files; ie, the state is directly involved in manipulating and/or censoring speech behind the scenes on public forums...but as Hasan has proven time and again he is a willing tool for power, his lack of interest on that subject should come as no surprise.
@@dutchdragonseryh on his head to head show he can be very aggressive/passively aggressive. He imo lost a debate to Majid Nawaz. His defence of Islam not being a violent religion in Oxford - was a bit disappointing and annoying. He actually came across aggressive himself. And I respect Islam myself.
@@danielmesa2102 He's not making strong arguments, he's making strawman arguments and manipulate listeners who are not fact checking, he's choosing weak arguments on purpose here; he's misguided and he know it, and has no shame
@@Abdullah.......... You want to kill me for being a lesbian and for refusing to convert to your religion, yet you are accusing me of hatred. Mehdi Hasan supports the Hamas terrorist organisation.
The problem here is that the 'opponents' of MH are often unclear or uncertain of their positions, hesitating and lacking conviction - especially the first two. MH is good at what he does, speaks very quickly (as usual) but this exercise doesn't prove you can 'win' every argument - just appear to do so temporarily. The test is fun to watch, but that is about as much as you can say.
This should warn you to think twice before agreeing with anything Mahdi Hassan says, the guy is a master in the art of convincing, which can be appealing and make you adopt ideologies based on no solid intellectual inclination or critical reasoning.
To win an argument is meaningless. This is because Mehdi always believes that he is always correct, morally right and factually right when most of the times he isn't. Being loud and not letting the other person speak is a sign of immaturity, child-like responsive and with little knowledge to show for. He always seeks to win argument focusing on a tree rather than the forest.
firstly, he is loud because that is how a debate goes....speakers must be eloquent and audible. Secondly, he never interrupts....he speaks fast as there is a time limit which u would understand if u have ever debated in ur life. He always brings facts to the argument....there is never a time that he doesn't.....and honestly rather than criticize u r better off bettering ur own argument cuz it's very misinformed, fact-less and baseless.
@@fareeedom-_- To be loud implies that one has no patience, nor is a good listener, but most of the time its a sign that ones wrong and by being loud enforces ones self to believe that hes correct, when he either isnt, or isnt but still insists. Secondly, he speaks fast because thats how speaks. Thirdly, he never brings facts, but opinions as hes a journalist who graduated from a religious school. I would recommend you follow your advice too.
@@emiliospowerballer1441 To be loud means to produce enough sound to be heard clearly....so i dont get ur point there. Because he is loud doesn't mean that he "enforces" rather he brings a point across....he doesn't interrupt anyone when he speaks and there is a time limit to every debate. Plus, u have to be joking when u say he doesn't bring any facts at all....if he doesn't why does he seem to justify most arguments here. I agree not every argument he wins as that is what being a debater is but to deny his ability to convey a message effortlessly and within time limit would be subjecting urself to ur own biased opinion and ignoring fact. Lastly a debate is never won based on opinion but fact to back that up....if u say he argues based on opinion u negate all debates he has won as a false victory....and u cant believe that can u ?
Mehdi wins arguments by posing questions and cutting off his opponents just as they are trying to make a point. Another of his tactics is not to answer questions himself if he knows that the answer would not further his narrative. I’ve watched him do interviews.
I'm sure winning every damn argument gratifies the ego, but I'd rather use argument to find out the truth. Encouraging anyone to win every argument is ultimately counterproductive and creates so much bad faith.
@@riezan What moozies believe and what is actually true, are two very different things. And you clowns can't solve the missing link problem either. Instead, you just choose to introduce another problem by lazily and arbitrarily filling in the gaps.
@@MikeCoxlong_NOR I don't think that you understand the point. I'm talking about Mehdi Hasan the man, the debater at large, his true persona, not this video.
@@dutchdragonserhe is a practicing devout Muslim and it's perfectly fine to lie in Islam as per the Quran and that's called 'al-taqiya' in Arabic ...please read up and you will be wiser 😊
He intelligently made the arguments which cannot be used for any gains and yet they were quite reasonable. He sure can win any argument even if he opposes it.
I recently saw his session with Vivek Ramaswamy. It was very disgusting to watch media spokespersons like him trying with every ounce of their minds to extract a non-existent point of fault with possibly the most forward and very articulate republican, just for the sake of "winning the argument". Its even more cringey to see it done for the furthering of democratic agenda. Winning an argument is a fool's shortcut to quick public appeal and pseudo-respect which wanes as soon as any knowledgeable person takes them to the toaster. What should have been uplifted is the virtue of unbiased media and critical thinking and a teeny bit of common sense and sense of situation. It can go a long way to show the person's deep standing honesty and loyalty to his/her scruples.
Mehdi is a hypocrite and does propaganda. He got paid to downplay the lab leak theory. Ignored all the evidence. And now, covid 19 patients zero in Wuhan identified - Forbes Also, Vanity Fair, NIH admits to funding risky virus research in Wuhan.
Mehid Hassan wins his arguments by stating a fact and a false outcome or cause for said fact. He is also the same person that said to Rishard Dawkins face that the punishment for apostacy in Islam isn death, and Dawkins was just too stunned to speak and moved on. He wins doesnt win every argument by logic, but by falacies and by every means necessary.
With Shapiro this would not be so interesting, they're both strawmanning a lot, and use too much rhetorics ... a more interesting one could be Konstantin Kisin, who's basic technique is _steelmanning_ arguments, making sure both sides understand what has actually been stated on every step... Mehdi would never take it up though...
@@dutchdragonser Sophistry (a person who utilizes this technique is called a “sophist”) is a style of argumentation in which the debater uses fallacious arguments in an attempt to deceptively persuade an audience (ie the general population) of individuals who lack the intellectual capability to spot the fallacies in the sophist’s reasoning. In other words, a conman who bamboozles laypeople through linguistic trickery into agreeing with him despite the fact that his arguments do not correspond to reality.
The first one he won if u look from a third party perspective, And u also gotta keep in mind he kept many good point to himself ( there are actually lot of reason why Donald Trump is better than Joe Biden , but mehndi couldn't say any of those because if he used good point then those point could be later used against him . Even if he had said he doesn't believe what he was about say but if he had stated facts his belief wouldn't matter and those facts would have cause him problems later on . So imagine he won all arguments without even speaking actual positive facts about his given topic .
Mehdi is a hypocrite and does propaganda. He got paid to downplay the lab leak theory. Ignored all the evidence. And now, covid 19 patients zero in Wuhan identified - Forbes Also, Vanity Fair, NIH admits to funding risky virus research in Wuhan.
Winning an argument is not everything, that’s a lesson wise men learn the hard way.
U had the opportunity to put yr views against his statement but chose to show pakis hate against Indians, well done.
@Àhmædfìñęhåìr very nice example of ad homs right there my dude
@Àhmædfìñęhåìr better a barking dog than a whining pig I'd say. Cheers!
I agree. Especially when one uses un-truths.
@@kumarj4693 why argue when one can do a poop and fling it at the opponent instead, probably indians
Hi it's Sam. The 3rd guy, I was so nervous 😬
You did good tho. You might be nervous I'd have shit my pants😂😂
Done well mate. Didn't look nervous to me
You spoke very well
Not bad for 17 huh?
@@samdonelan6495 17? Your generation is screwed. Good luck.
"I just dont believe what i just said"- Mehdi Hasan 😂😂. The most hilarious line in my 2024
I LOVED the twisting of the word 'intervention' by Hasan. Very clever.
Please bring more , I can’t get enough of watching him debate!
Have you watch the Oxford Union debate? That's the best debate by him.
@@incineratorium ikr he spoke so smoothly that it was like a fever dream
Mehdi shouts at people. He doesn't debate
@@acespark2894 He is the most gentle debater , most likely you ever saw. Yet you say this ? or is it something else that you cannot stand him.
@@faiyazbinzaman5648 truth is pricy nowadays
Watching on Apr. 6, 2023. There's no watermark.... I hope no one is making clips of Mehdi out of context!
“I do not believe what I just said”, ruined all : Cheers, Mehdi Hasan! This guy is a genius.
The girl,who argued for the Middle East,
Hats off!
Mehdi is a joke.
He got paid to downplay the lab leak theory. Ignored all the evidence.
And now, covid 19 patients zero in Wuhan identified - Forbes
Also, Vanity Fair, NIH admits to funding risky virus research in Wuhan.
He is the hero of morons😂
Dude Can debate either sides of Any Bloody Argument and still Win…
😂
we saw him with Dawkins ...:D
Ok muslim bhakt
@@kelumjjshow he lost believing in fantasies created by humans😂
@@NTIS-DHARMIK fantasies about animals and idol worship are far worse
Just goes to prove, u can pick and choose your facts in a debate on any issue. Morality, decency, being humane... need to factor. Intelligence and facts can go either way.
state interests are amoral but they need to frame that for the peasants to keep funding their wars. And ofc, the peasents believe they are exercising their free right to vote but are fully conditioned to respond like they want it. It is always us against them (them changes from time to time ).
No. You can get your arguments for/against the topic. But it doesn't mean your arguments are correct and hold the position. The argument is won by the one who counters opposite arguments and puts forward his compelling strong arguments with consistency.
Omg nothing escapes his mind , he’s undisputedly a great orator
But why fly with a winged horse ????
He got humiliated by dawkins
Dawkins believes having sex without consent is not objectively wrong. He thinks incest is not objectively wrong.
@@mrannymussource? Oh wait - you don't have one. Try again
@@shroudedgrove4679
Rape?
Source: th-cam.com/video/aw2u8lOHhas/w-d-xo.htmlsi=TIPcmPXezXHCLPFr
Incest?
Source: th-cam.com/video/MVOvLe3MjwA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=g6TYG7Jl6seyZVpD
Notice how he says it’s a clever devise to use 2 sisters rather than say an 80 year old great grandfather and a 18 year old great granddaughter? It’s because one is easier to accept to the masses and so the question flies under the radar.
This 10 min video was resourceful for me. Thank you
Mehdi Hasan needs his own debate show!!
Head to head al jazeera, top show
he doesnt even have a show anymore
@@asdfasdfasdf4746 Someone like him will always have a platform.
He already created it, Check his show Zeteo
He’s awful
He is natural talented and blessed .may Allah bless him with long healthy life.
may Allah guide him to REAL islam ameen
Preferably a short life. Another child groomer.
Kore khankir pola kata chda
নুনেন্দ্র মুতি
What a fraud.
- Trump is the only President not to start a false war to please the war-profiteers and deep state true fascists.
- Trump is the President talking about closing the border from illegals stealing MILLIONS pf jobs from the American poor...and as the Black unemployment is almost DOUBLE the national average.
- Trump helped to make America oil independent. Biden is now begging dictators for production he squashed in America.
Is Hasan really this stupid???....YES he is. He's the same goof who said..."Non-Muslims live like animals" and "Mohammed flew to heaven on a winged horse".
Mehdi sometimes can be a comedian 😂😂😂😂
I like it 😊
After all he is a Cool 😎 Muslim Dude
Mlielan
This foolishness hasan is the same Guy who in the U.K. London tought Muslim extremism and homosexual homophobia lost his audience now in the U.S. trying to be funny journalist 🙄😆🔩🔩🔩
This hypocritical Hinduphobic White Collar Jihadi, Mehdi Hassan, who lectures non Islamic countries on democracy and human values was an ex-employee of Aljazeera, a mouth piece of the autocratic Qatar government, a country in which there are no religious minority rights, women's rights or LGBTQ rights Mehdi Hassan also spreads the propaganda of the 'peaceful' religion which spread 'peaceful' bomb blasts and other acts of violence all over the world including the most recent attack on Salman Rushdie in NewYork. Now he has penetrated the American media space to further spread 'peace' in the garb of a left of center journalist. He talks for minorities in America while being conspicuously silent about the millions being tortured or persecuted for blasphemy in the muslim world. And the irony is all this while, this political islamic pawn has not grown balls to say a word against China, which is peacefully torturing innocent Uighur muslims :D
He's a comedian to deflect from the fact that he's not at all logical
Never give your enemy a chance to put across his point fully
- Mehdi Has-Sun Tzu, 2023
this is the only tactic the lil rat has
I know of two pied pipers who have 'rat'led him
He is a consummate Islamist. The British people should prepare themselves well before taking him on any debate.
@@sonjoybhattacharji5706 An Islamist😱😱
Rule of debate. Learn to manage time
Winning arguments: 60 % knowledge 📙 + 20 % intelligence 💫 + 20% your personality & charisma 🧑. Lack any of the 3 elements, it will not work 😔
The credibility of the your argument matters too.
90 % knowledge
80% personality & charisma AND DEMEANOR - people will believe anything if you deliver it well an you look like someone they believe (eg Donald Trump)
Seriously mehndi Hassan is a genius gem.
You need to read more if you believe this
Funny his argument for trump running again is true.
He tginks horses fly
You call that a genius?!
He is a narcist and jew hating so called journalist
6:30 that was absolutely genius
💯
mehedi's quick wit is on another level... amazing fast mind...
Mehdi, please argue that there aren’t ways to win every argument
We defeat by mind n win by heart
without a shred of doubt, the undisputed Mr. Mehdi Hasan has always won an argument "for/against" any debate on any forum.
Dawkins made him look ridiculous, but that was the sheer weakness of his position that left him so vulnerable.
Except for the one he lost on air to Matt. Oh many more losses when he speaks with forked tongue like a true Satan in disguise
Yes, but he should not use lies to win! Shameful.
especially when says "the profet flew with a winged horse" that was comedy gold .Now lets be peaceful , you religion of peace guys
Most stupid people always win arguments. Most intelligent people know when to be progressive and when to withdraw and listen. Now which category is Mehdi? 😂
Trust me he never won any argument in front of his wife.
Although Mehdi Hassan wasnt giving it his best he wasnt serious but he did do well over here. Good for him, Id much rather see him debate with seriousness
Holy crappie...I need to read loads of books ASAP
Mehid: ''Do not clip this out of context"
The internet: ''clipping it out of context''
this is part of his strawmaning retorics, he's actually using very weak arguments that nobody would quote here, especially in this glee tone
@kobikaicalev175 why don't u point them out instead of whining? 😂
@@md.morshedyaqub3490 he's pointing them out himself, that's the whole lesson he gives here, how to "win any argument" using just retorics, I'm not complaining against anything, I think Mehdi would agree with this point, that the technique he demonstrates here, it's useful in this debate scape, i just think it's a very weak attitude
@@kobikaicalev175
While it may be tempting to label Mehid Hasan's arguments as "strawmaning" and "weak," such a characterization oversimplifies the nuances of his discourse. It is essential to engage with his points critically and assess the validity of his claims rather than dismissing them based solely on perceived tone or presentation style.
1. **Understanding Context:** Arguably, Hasan’s approach may be a reflection of the broader social or political context in which he operates. The tone perceived as "gleeful" could be interpreted as a rhetorical strategy aimed at highlighting contradictions or weaknesses in opposing viewpoints. This could encourage a more engaged discussion rather than stifling it through a serious or somber demeanor.
2. **Addressing Arguments Directly:** Rather than focusing on the perceived weakness of his arguments, one could analyze the specific claims he makes. Engaging with the content allows for a deeper understanding of his perspective and potentially exposes the strengths in his arguments, which may not be immediately apparent.
3. **The Importance of Rhetorical Strategies:** Rhetoric often plays a crucial role in shaping discourse. While some may find Hasan's tone objectionable, it may resonate with certain audiences, making complex ideas more accessible. Dismissing his arguments outright ignores the potential value of rhetorical diversity in public debate.
4. **Challenging the Assumption of Weakness:** The assertion that "nobody would quote here" his arguments may not hold up under scrutiny. Different audiences engage with content in varied ways, and the appeal of Hasan's arguments could vary significantly based on individual perspectives and experiences.
In conclusion, while one may critique Hasan's rhetoric, it is crucial to engage with his arguments substantively rather than reducing them to simplistic categorizations. A more constructive approach would involve addressing the specifics of his claims and considering their broader implications within the discourse.
I used to like this guy then I started disliking him. But I always respected him. I personally feel he has lost a lot of arguements on his own head to head show. But here he was brilliant
He destroyed Matt Taibbi. It was painful and brutal. Like nothing I've ever seen
@@burgermind802 Turns out that his hit on Matt was based largely on misinformation...also he didn't actually address the core tenet of the Twitter files; ie, the state is directly involved in manipulating and/or censoring speech behind the scenes on public forums...but as Hasan has proven time and again he is a willing tool for power, his lack of interest on that subject should come as no surprise.
Can you say which videos exactly made u dislike him
@@dutchdragonseryh on his head to head show he can be very aggressive/passively aggressive. He imo lost a debate to Majid Nawaz. His defence of Islam not being a violent religion in Oxford - was a bit disappointing and annoying. He actually came across aggressive himself. And I respect Islam myself.
I Like the way he explains his Arguments
Zara may Allah bless her with long healthy life she is a smart and knowledgeable girl.
Kuguma raacsani
I believe winning an argument is more like pyrrhic victory
I agree. How about reasonable discussion?
Oh my God Mehdi Hasan such genius in debate. His knowledge also commendable ❤
Just shows how debates should not be done by trained debators, same as like civil lawsuits should be managed without lawyers
No, it just means you have to read and educate yourself so you can make strong arguments.
@@danielmesa2102 He's not making strong arguments, he's making strawman arguments and manipulate listeners who are not fact checking, he's choosing weak arguments on purpose here; he's misguided and he know it, and has no shame
Mr Hasan is unbelievably great speaker
Really?????
@@mikehw7526 ofcourse
he's unbelievably stupid and arrogant
No they're both gaslighters but Obama is better than him
Mehdi is an inspiration
An inspiration to terrorists everywhere.
@@SharonN-ug3gr Where does so much hatred come from? Do you have a hate generator inside of you? Or is it just WhatsApp University?
@@Abdullah.......... You want to kill me for being a lesbian and for refusing to convert to your religion, yet you are accusing me of hatred. Mehdi Hasan supports the Hamas terrorist organisation.
I LOVE THIS MAN
The problem here is that the 'opponents' of MH are often unclear or uncertain of their positions, hesitating and lacking conviction - especially the first two. MH is good at what he does, speaks very quickly (as usual) but this exercise doesn't prove you can 'win' every argument - just appear to do so temporarily. The test is fun to watch, but that is about as much as you can say.
Yeh he isn't that smart and his debate skills are as good as the average kid from Liverpool
@@shroudedgrove4679nope you just want muslims to lose so you can feel superior
'Winning' does not mean being in the right. It is just about convincing the audience.
That was great! All of you. Wonderful sports incl Mehdi.
This should warn you to think twice before agreeing with anything Mahdi Hassan says, the guy is a master in the art of convincing, which can be appealing and make you adopt ideologies based on no solid intellectual inclination or critical reasoning.
To win an argument is meaningless. This is because Mehdi always believes that he is always correct, morally right and factually right when most of the times he isn't. Being loud and not letting the other person speak is a sign of immaturity, child-like responsive and with little knowledge to show for. He always seeks to win argument focusing on a tree rather than the forest.
firstly, he is loud because that is how a debate goes....speakers must be eloquent and audible. Secondly, he never interrupts....he speaks fast as there is a time limit which u would understand if u have ever debated in ur life. He always brings facts to the argument....there is never a time that he doesn't.....and honestly rather than criticize u r better off bettering ur own argument cuz it's very misinformed, fact-less and baseless.
@@fareeedom-_- To be loud implies that one has no patience, nor is a good listener, but most of the time its a sign that ones wrong and by being loud enforces ones self to believe that hes correct, when he either isnt, or isnt but still insists. Secondly, he speaks fast because thats how speaks. Thirdly, he never brings facts, but opinions as hes a journalist who graduated from a religious school. I would recommend you follow your advice too.
@@emiliospowerballer1441 To be loud means to produce enough sound to be heard clearly....so i dont get ur point there. Because he is loud doesn't mean that he "enforces" rather he brings a point across....he doesn't interrupt anyone when he speaks and there is a time limit to every debate. Plus, u have to be joking when u say he doesn't bring any facts at all....if he doesn't why does he seem to justify most arguments here. I agree not every argument he wins as that is what being a debater is but to deny his ability to convey a message effortlessly and within time limit would be subjecting urself to ur own biased opinion and ignoring fact. Lastly a debate is never won based on opinion but fact to back that up....if u say he argues based on opinion u negate all debates he has won as a false victory....and u cant believe that can u ?
These three students certainly learned the art of debating and refuting arguments from Mehdi.
Mehdi wins arguments by posing questions and cutting off his opponents just as they are trying to make a point. Another of his tactics is not to answer questions himself if he knows that the answer would not further his narrative. I’ve watched him do interviews.
Well he isn't interrupting here 😂
I'm sure winning every damn argument gratifies the ego, but I'd rather use argument to find out the truth. Encouraging anyone to win every argument is ultimately counterproductive and creates so much bad faith.
Loved it. Mehdi is pure intelligence
Hasan is a puppet of Qatar, he is not genius, and you are confusing equality of opinion with intelligence
If you think bias and fast talking is intelligence, then you saying Ben Shapiro is a genius
@@riezan What moozies believe and what is actually true, are two very different things.
And you clowns can't solve the missing link problem either. Instead, you just choose to introduce another problem by lazily and arbitrarily filling in the gaps.
he is an islamist, usually the opposite of intelligent
@@riezan what missing link? we have them all, rope a dope
I just ordered his book 🎉
Mehdi hassan he's rare talent 👈
Exaggerated
Funny how johnny given the topics they knew they would never be able to win if they put mehdi against 😂😂😂😂
He "wins arguments" by not debating in good faith, by using straw man tactics.
What are the straw man tactics he used and how would u have responded instead that shows "good faith". This is just shallow criticism
True mate ! He only acts like he's debating actually he presents things in a way that fools the general audience.
Or you're just a sore loser
I don't think you understood the point
@@MikeCoxlong_NOR I don't think that you understand the point. I'm talking about Mehdi Hasan the man, the debater at large, his true persona, not this video.
the only time he lost, when he debated with Richard dwakins.
" he believes Muhammad flew on windhorse to heaven " oh man that was epic.
If you are of the Islamic faith and believe the Quran is the Truth, then that’s what we believe.
These people are literally teaching each other how to lie and manipulate. Unbelievable.
In other words, stand for debate
What if you rather say " teaching to be a good debater". You won't win arguments by lying and manipulating against a good and intelligent debater.
He supports the Palestinians, they are MASTERS when it comes to manipulating and lying to people
7:00
Who's "we"?
The guy is a british citizen of Indian descent. He's not a middle easterner by any stretch.
Plz Upload the Full Q/A session
The awesome Mahdi Hassan. He wins his arguments also because he’s very well read and his delivery is superb.
Also he lies when needed and is a known plagiarist.
@@AA-cg3gd lies when needed? Where or when did he, and what did he plagiarize
@@dutchdragonserRichard dawkins asked him if there is death as punishment for apostasy in islam and he blatantly said no
@@dutchdragonserhe is a practicing devout Muslim and it's perfectly fine to lie in Islam as per the Quran and that's called 'al-taqiya' in Arabic ...please read up and you will be wiser 😊
He intelligently made the arguments which cannot be used for any gains and yet they were quite reasonable. He sure can win any argument even if he opposes it.
damn, he is so talented and brillant
The art of debate is the art of manipulation. Great message Mehdi.
Jordan Peterson will be muted by this man... I believe...
Thid man had his anus destroyed by richard dawkins
You can win all arguments but does that mean one is on the side of truth. NO. Not at all.
Very true
They r not talking truth here! Mind you
MasAllah Mehdi, what beautiful and smart brother!!
Medhi is the MUHAMMAD ALI Of the debating world, im sure if I had to debate him that 2 +2 is 4 and he had to debate it wasn't he would still win.
He is too fast (in his arguments) to be followed by ordinary non native speakers like me .
Masha Allah mehdi. Ur a genius
He won THE argument that matttered. So convincingly that it cost him his job ... but by doing so, justified his whole existence.
Amazing Mehdi, surely this was a trap, you dealt with it fantastically
Surely this was all about trapping Mehdi but he nailed it ..but the evil ones will still cut this and use the clip they would like...
I am surprised why he even agreed to such event
Mehdiiiii❤ It was great
MH is one of those people who can "getcha" and possibly win the battle but ultimately lose the war.
I recently saw his session with Vivek Ramaswamy. It was very disgusting to watch media spokespersons like him trying with every ounce of their minds to extract a non-existent point of fault with possibly the most forward and very articulate republican, just for the sake of "winning the argument". Its even more cringey to see it done for the furthering of democratic agenda.
Winning an argument is a fool's shortcut to quick public appeal and pseudo-respect which wanes as soon as any knowledgeable person takes them to the toaster. What should have been uplifted is the virtue of unbiased media and critical thinking and a teeny bit of common sense and sense of situation. It can go a long way to show the person's deep standing honesty and loyalty to his/her scruples.
Mehdi Hassan great hero
Gotta love Mehdi Hasan.
He's a great debater!
Right.
Hes a masturbator.
yeah, pity he's a bought and paid for hack for establishment though. lol
Mehdi is a hypocrite and does propaganda.
He got paid to downplay the lab leak theory. Ignored all the evidence.
And now, covid 19 patients zero in Wuhan identified - Forbes
Also, Vanity Fair, NIH admits to funding risky virus research in Wuhan.
He got humiliated by Dawkings
Winning an argument is not being articulate, it’s being logical
Apparently not.
Mashaallah. This is power of islam.
Long live Gary Lineker!
Mehid Hassan wins his arguments by stating a fact and a false outcome or cause for said fact. He is also the same person that said to Rishard Dawkins face that the punishment for apostacy in Islam isn death, and Dawkins was just too stunned to speak and moved on. He wins doesnt win every argument by logic, but by falacies and by every means necessary.
He is eloquent intelligent and speaks with solid logics simply he is amazing
The 3rd Guy was very cool and trying to show himself More Powerful
We need to see a debate between Mehdi Hassan and ben shephero
About the Israeli and Palestinian conflict.
It's will be a historical debate
I was thinking about this exact same thing these few days, that’d be a legendary debate to watch!
You mean Sheephero, I hope 😂😂😂
With Shapiro this would not be so interesting, they're both strawmanning a lot, and use too much rhetorics ... a more interesting one could be Konstantin Kisin, who's basic technique is _steelmanning_ arguments, making sure both sides understand what has actually been stated on every step... Mehdi would never take it up though...
Mehdi Hasan, the one Man we can count on to defeat his Wife in an argument.........
Mehdi is a sophist.
What does this mean
@@dutchdragonser Sophistry (a person who utilizes this technique is called a “sophist”) is a style of argumentation in which the debater uses fallacious arguments in an attempt to deceptively persuade an audience (ie the general population) of individuals who lack the intellectual capability to spot the fallacies in the sophist’s reasoning. In other words, a conman who bamboozles laypeople through linguistic trickery into agreeing with him despite the fact that his arguments do not correspond to reality.
Moral of the story- Whatever till date, Mehdi debated is just for to win the argument but not what he believed..
I don't think he won any of these. Still a good speaker though.
Lol he literally won them all and pretty convincingly and was arguing against things he believes lol
@@AbdulTaufik97 nope and definitely not the 1st one...he just joked things away but still amazing in speech...mashaAllah for his talent
@@fauziajasia2548 actually he won it if you compare it to the challenger
The first one he won if u look from a third party perspective,
And u also gotta keep in mind he kept many good point to himself ( there are actually lot of reason why Donald Trump is better than Joe Biden , but mehndi couldn't say any of those because if he used good point then those point could be later used against him .
Even if he had said he doesn't believe what he was about say but if he had stated facts his belief wouldn't matter and those facts would have cause him problems later on .
So imagine he won all arguments without even speaking actual positive facts about his given topic .
@@fauziajasia2548 he definitely won the 1st one. N the rest
You can see Medhi Hasan on TH-cam calling non-Muslims "cattle" -- that was before he realised he could make a career /living out of these "cattle."
I love Mehdi he must always win a true role model
Mehdi is a hypocrite and does propaganda.
He got paid to downplay the lab leak theory. Ignored all the evidence.
And now, covid 19 patients zero in Wuhan identified - Forbes
Also, Vanity Fair, NIH admits to funding risky virus research in Wuhan.
Being disingenuous is best way to win argument
he is so swift and clever. Prayers for him
I like this and we should have more of conversations about things like this
Mehdi is speaking fast, people won't caught him lieing
Ok jew
@James Bond don't defend Mehdi, he despises people like you
WOW, those were great points to argue about.
Mehdi Hasan is really a talanted guy, May Allah bless youuu
He has a lot to say and none of it is worth the breath.
He can take up standup comedy, just ask him to stick to his serious journalism. He will succeed in making people laugh
Against a novice...fact is better than bombastic words..
He can lie and distort facts very well to make seem as if he's winning an argument.
Which facts has he distorted
how to win any argument: let me give u 3 reasons
Mehdi Hasan is a skilled sophist, nothing more.
Bingo! And not even really that skilled, either. Just a member of the tribe that is supported by the establishment at the moment.
@@user-hn9qw7ou8d too much Ruppert Murdoch media makes a person brain dead.
a Muslim James o brien
The 3rd guy forgot to take the hanger out of his jacket.
Mehdi is Genius in debates.
i fall in his love seeing his first video
Mehdi is actually quite a talented chap
If he was talented, he wouldn't have to plagiarize the work of others.
Mehdi Hasan is the GOAT of debates!
Mehdi is a king of debates!!❤
How about Dr Zakir naik?
King of losers.
except when talk with richard dawking in which case Medhi is humiliated for ever
Mehfi Hasan is one smart, entertaining, guy. I suppose that's why he's no longer on TV.
I feel sorry for whoever marries this thing
Mehdi is a genius. His arguments omg