Rational Islam vs Al-Ghazali - Great Muslim Philosophers - Islam & Science (Part 3)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ธ.ค. 2023
- Join my Whatsapp Channel on below link
whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va80...
Watch complete series "Islam and Science" • Islam & Science
🌌 Embark on a mesmerizing journey through the corridors of Islamic intellectual history in part 3 of my series, "Islam and Science."📜✨ Part 3 delves deep into the remarkable lives of five Muslim visionaries-Al-Kindi, Al-Razi, Ibn Sina, Ibn Rushd, and Ibn Khaldun-whose intellectual brilliance and unyielding pursuit of knowledge placed them at odds with religious orthodoxy. 🤯💡
🔍 Uncover the rich tapestry of Al-Kindi's pioneering work in translating Greek philosophical texts, Al-Razi's groundbreaking contributions to medicine and alchemy, Ibn Sina's monumental "Canon of Medicine," Ibn Rushd's eloquent defense of reason, and Ibn Khaldun's profound insights into history and sociology. 🌐📚
But the plot thickens! In the second segment, we shine a light on the enigmatic Al-Ghazali. Revered for his theological contributions, Al-Ghazali's orthodox ideas inadvertently triggered a decline in rationality, leaving an indelible mark on Muslim civilization. 🌌🔍
👁️🗨️ Witness the clash of ideas and the consequences of dissent as we explore the intricate dance between faith and reason during this pivotal era in Islamic history. 🚀🤔 Don't miss this riveting episode where philosophical titans challenge the status quo, shaping the course of history with their unapologetic pursuit of truth.
🎥 Join us in unraveling the secrets of intellectual rebellion, where icons clash, ideas collide, and the echoes of these heretic philosophers resound through the ages. 🌍✨ #IslamAndScience #PhilosophyTrailblazers #HereticPhilosophers #IslamicIntellectuals #UnveilingHistory #FaithVsReason #KnowledgeRevolution 🚀
Join my Whatsapp Channel
whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va80Cgj23n3ZTl5Gbq16
Order My bestselling book Readistan on the below link in Pakistan
www.libertybooks.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=110840
Order Readistan on Amazon India on the below link
amzn.to/3MQxxec
Order Readistan in Amazon USA on the below link
bitly.ws/32TKL
Order Readistan on Barnes and Noble USA on the below link
www.barnesandnoble.com/w/book/1144385414?ean=9786277626037
Order Readistan on Amazon UK on the below link
bitly.ws/33SkK
You can get 20% discount on the biggest bookstore chain in Pakistan libertybooks.com by using coupon code “bookbuddy” on their website. Shop as much as you want. (Minimum shopping Rs. 2500)
Useful links:
Islam and Science: t.ly/zqGG-
Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam: t.ly/zqGG-
Psychology & Philosophy Books: t.ly/zqGG-
Motivational & Self Help Books: t.ly/QcQE0
Islam and science made me.laigh. 😂
Sasta youtuber ho tum😡 jo arguement ghazali ke against sab dete hain ,wahi chipka rha hai idhar😡 ghazali ko bilkul bhi padha nahi hai tumne
No words to appreciate ur incredible thoughts. 🌸 Moula apko hamisha salamt rakhy ameen
بہترین۔۔۔۔۔مزہب اور علم کے مطلق ایسی ویڈیوز لازمی مولویوں کو ضرور دیکھنا اور سمجھنا چاہیۓ۔۔۔۔بہت اجھی لگی ویڈیو۔۔۔۔۔
Wawo wawo wawo...
Can't quench my thirst with philosophy and love for wisdom ❤❤❤❤ can't can't can't quench....
Wish u more power
Looking forward to seeing more from you. ❤
You spoken exactly what I think. This third video is more better than previous two.
I was waiting for this ❤
Excellent, glad to bump into this channel , now subscribed.
Sir , I have read both books "The incoherence of Philosophy " and the " Incoherence of Incoherence " ....Believe me sir , Today I feel delighted that i have subscribed your Channel...You are such becon of Hope ,Light of wisdom against this all pervasive ignorance..Usually am not are person who like to do comments under vedios but today i feel obliged to do so.. ❤️❤️
😊👍🏻
مسلمان سائنس دانوں پر ظلم کے غیر ثابت واقعات! part 1
==========================
سوشل میڈیا پر کافی عرصہ سے ایک پوسٹ گردش کر رہی ہے جس کے مطابق مسلمان سائنسدانوں کے ساتھ مسلمانوں نے بہت عبرتناک رویہ رکھا۔۔۔ہو سکتا ہے ان باتوں میں کچھ کسی حد تک درست بھی ہوں مگر زیادہ تر غیر ثابت شدہ ہیں ۔۔۔۔اِس تحریر میں اُن سائنسدانوں کے حالات و واقعات مستند حوالہ جات کے ذریعے بیان کیے گئے ہیں !
۱) یعقوب بن اسحاق الکندی:
ان تحریر لکھنے والوں کے مطابق یعقوب بن اسحاق الکندی پر "مُلّا" کی وجہ سے تشدد کیا گیا، ان کا کتب خانہ ضبط گیا۔ اس کو سرِ عام کوڑے مارے گئے اور اس کو جب کوڑے مارے جاتے تھے، تو لوگ ہنستے تھے۔ الکندی معتزلہ کے دور میں پیدا ہوئے تھے جب مامون الرشید اور معتصم باللہ جیسے عباسی خلفاء کے دور میں پیدا ہوا تھا۔ معتصم اور مامون معتزلی اور یونانی فلسفہ کے حامی تھے۔ معتصم ہی نے تو امام احمدؓ پر خوب ظلم کیا تھا کیونکہ وہ معتزلہ کے عقائد کو مسترد کرتے تھے۔
مامون الرشید میں بھی اعتزال تھا۔ حوالے کے طور پر علّامہ شبلی نعمانیؒ کی کتاب "المامون" دیکھ لیجیئے۔ [المامون، صفحہ نمبر ۱۶۱-۱۶۲] یہ لوگ کسی کو فلسفہ کی بنیاد پر کیونکر سزا دے سکتے ہیں؟ اور یعقوب کی سیرت پر ابن صاعد الاندلسیؒ نے اپنی کتاب "طبقات الأمم" میں ذکر کیا ہے مگر اس میں ایسی کسی بات کا ذکر نہیں کہ اس کو مارا گیا یا کوڑے لگائے گئے ہوں۔ [طبقات الأمم لابن صاعد الأندلسي، صفحہ نمبر ۵۱] اس کے علاوہ دیگر مؤرخین نے بھی ان کا ذکر اپنی کتابوں میں کیا ہے مگر ایسی کسی بات کا ذکر نہیں کیا۔
البتہ بڑی مشکل سے ایک روایت ملی ہے جس کے مطابق عباسی خلیفہ "متوکل" نے یعقوب الکندی کو مارا تھا۔ [الوافي بالوفيات، جلد ۱۵، صفحہ نمبر ۲۹۴] مگر اس میں بھی لوگوں کے ہنسنے کا کہیں ذکر نہیں، اور وہ دیگر تفصیلات جو بیان کی گئی ہیں، وہ اس میں موجود نہیں ہے۔ اور یہ روایت غیر مستند بھی ہے۔ اس کا راوی ابو کامل الحاسب مجہول ہے۔ [لسان الميزان، جلد ۳، صفحہ نمبر ۱۶۳] ایسی روایت سے کچھ ثابت نہیں ہوتا۔ اور ہنسنے اور لوگوں کے قہقہ لگانے کے حوالے سے بقیہ باتیں بھی اپنے مبالغے سے انہوں نے شامل کی ہیں، ان کا تو اس روایت میں بھی کہیں ذکر نہیں۔
۲) علّامہ ابو الولید ابنِ رشد رحمہ اللہ:
ایک دعویٰ یہ بھی کیا گیا کہ جنابِ ابنِ رشد کو "بے دین" قرار دیا گیا اور پھر ان کی کتابوں کو جلادیا گیا۔ پھر جامع مسجد کے ستون پر باندھ کر ابنِ رشد کے منہ پر لوگوں نے تھوکنا شروع کردیا۔ اس "ٰعظیم" عالم نے زندگی آخری دن ذلّت اور گُمنامی میں گذار دی۔ مولویوں نے کیا واقعی علّامہ ابنِ رشدؒ کے حوالے سے کبھی ایسا کچھ کہا؟ علّامہ ابن ابی صبیعہ رحمہ اللہ ان کے متعلق فرماتے ہیں:
كان أوحد في الفقه والخلاف، وبرع في الطب
ترجمہ: وہ فقہ و خلاف میں یکتا (اپنی شان) رکھتے تھے، اور علومِ طب کے ماہر تھے۔
[يون الأنباء في طبقات الأطباء، جلد ۳، صفحہ نمبر ۳۱۹]
علّامہ ذہبیؒ ان کے متعلق مدح کرتے ہوئے فرماتے ہیں:
وكان يُفزع إلى فتياه في الطب، كما يُفزع إلى فتياه في الفقه، مع وفور العربية، وقيل: كان يحفظ ديوان أبي تمام والمتنبي.
[سير أعلام النبلاء، جلد ۲۱، صفحہ نمبر ۳۱۸]
یعنی علومِ طب اور علومِ فقہ میں ان جیسا کوئی نہ تھا اور انہوں نے ابو تمام اور منتبی کے دیوان بھی حفظ کیے ہوئے تھے۔
فقہ مالکی کی کتاب "بداية المجتهد ونهاية المقتصد" ایک زبردست فقہ کی کتاب ہے جو علّامہ ابنِ رشد نے لکھی تھی۔ امام مالکؒ کی کتاب موطا امام مالکؒ کو آپؒ نے حفظ کیا تھا۔ مشہور محدث و حافظ محمد بن رزق رحمہ اللہ کے آپ شاگرد تھے۔ اس کے علاوہ علومِ دین پر مناهج الأدلة في عقائد الملة میں اسلام کے عقائد کو آپ نے ثابت کرنے کے لیے تویل فلسفیانہ ابواب باندھے ہیں۔ ان کی کتاب "بداية" کو فقہ میں اچھی خاصی شہرت حاصل ہے اور اس کی شروحات تک سعودیہ عرب وغیرہ سے شائع ہوچکی ہیں۔ اور علماء نے بڑی عزت سے ان کا تذکرہ کیا ہے۔
مگر ان مولویوں نے اس تحریر کے مطابق ابنِ رشد کو "دین بیزار" کہا ہے جس کا کوئی ثبوت نہیں ہے۔ اور قاضی ابنِ رشدؒ اشبیلہ کے قاضی بھی رہ چکے تھے۔ ان کو حکومت نے ہی اس منصب پر فائز کیا تھا۔ [ابن رشد والرشدية، صفحہ نمبر ۴۴۶] ارنست ریحان نے اپنی کتاب "ابن رشد والرشدية" کے قطعات میں تمام سابقہ سیرتوں سے ابنِ رشد کا ذکر نقل کیا ہے، مگر میں نے کہیں بھی یہ جامع مسجد میں تھوکنے والی بات نہیں پڑھی ہے۔ یہ تو خدا ہی جانتا ہے کہ کونسی روایت میں ہے۔
ہاں، ابنِ رشد کی سزا کا ذکر ملتا ہے۔ مگر کیا کسی مُلّا کی وجہ سے سزا ہوئی تھی؟ ہرگز بھی نہیں! طبیب ابن ابی صبیعہ کے مطابق وجہ یہ تھی کہ ابنِ رشد نے اپنی کتاب الحیوان میں خلیفہ منصور کو "الملك البربر" کہہ دیا تھا جس کے معنی اچھے نہیں بنتے۔ غلطی سے تصحیف ہوگئی اور "الملك البرين" کی جگہ بادشاہ کو "بربر" کہہ دیا گیا جس پر بادشاہ کو غصّہ آیا اور اس نے سزا دی۔ [ابن رشد والرشدية، صفحہ نمبر ۴۴۸]
اس میں کسی مولوی کا کیا قصور تھا یا کیا قصور ہے؟ یہ کام انگلستان میں اگر کوئی سائنس دان کرتا، تو ایک دو صدی پہلے اس کا بھی یہی حشر ہوتا بلکہ اس سے شاید اس سے بھی بُری حالت ہوتی۔ یہی کام پچھلی صدی جرمنی میں کوئی کرتا تو شاید مار دیا جاتا، ابنِ رشد تو زندہ رکھا گیا اور صرف اپنے گھر میں نظر بند کیا گیا تھا۔ اگرچہ ان کے ثبوت بھی قطعی الثبوت نہیں ہیں، مشکوک ہوسکتے ہیں مگر ایسی باتیں کہیں بھی نہیں جو مشہور کی جارہی ہیں۔
اور میرا ایک سوال ہے، اگر واقعی ساری کتابیں جلادی تھیں، تو آج دنیا بھر میں ابنِ رشد کی ہر موضوع پر کوئی نہ کوئی کتاب کیسے موجود ہے؟ کونسی کتاب جلائی گئی؟ ہمیں بھی بتائیں۔ کیسا بیوقوفانہ اعتراض ہے؟ اس طرح تو کوئی کتاب ہی آپ تک نہیں پہنچنی چاہیئے تھی۔
و میرے علم میں اس کا کوئی ثبوت نہیں ہے۔
Very informative series,...keep on making more videos on this topic...
Nice to be on your channel…
That's incredible work
Thank you for creating this type of quality content
🙂
A vedio of just 15/16 minutes isn't enough plz make it some lengthy... I love it
Great explanation
There’s no point blaming Ghazali. Those who blame Ghazali never read him. Otherwise they would not miss that Kant and Hume were taking a similar approach to philosophy from an agnostic approach. The principle of causality for instance. Which Ghazali wrote 700 years ago.
Al-Ghazali believed that the natural laws that govern the world are simply patterns that God has established and that God can choose to alter these patterns at any time. Therefore, in the occasionalist view, the laws of nature are not immutable, but are contingent on God's will.
✴This video is a testimony of confirmation bias. Khawarizmi (unknown creed) and Ibn al Haythm were the top Muslim scientists. Ibn al Haythm's creed was Ashariah, which opposes Mutazillah. He emphasized not preferring reason over revelation, criticized Greek writings that they just spread ikhtalaf, and advocated for the scientific method. same for Razi and ibn Khaladun. Also, Gazzali was against the metaphysical (branch of philosophy that deals with the nature of reality, existence, time, and god) approach of philosophers...However, he supported science and rationality. He belonged to the Ashariah school of Ilm Kalam, which promotes the use of reason alongside revelation. Al-Ghazali stated that the greatest crime against religion is opposing science, and he considered pursuing any science that can help the community to grow as Farze Kafayah. Drawing a parallel, the transgressed statement by the late Stephen Hawking," Philosophy is dead and we don't need it anymore " doesn't necessarily mean he was against rationality. The Scientific Revolution marked a shift from the medieval Aristotelian worldview to a more quantitative and mechanistic approach to understanding the natural world.
@@hasixdyt7488 I also adore science but in modern world science is also a problem because it's standing on the metaphysical position of materialism and scientism. We have to purify the science from this too.
@@M.Faseeh93 Yeah. I agree
You all r right. He is kafir. Islam is the last science. Muslim must follow Mullahs and Molvies only. Mullahs r natural leaders of Muslims.
Jhoot mat bol,tu hai kaun chal nikal
Her baat ky peechay science aur science ya her shay key peechay divine power Allah eshwar god .. yeh alfaaz b kiss NY bajayeh ussi divine power ny jiss ny sub Kuch banaya.. haq hy science coz such Ka Allah hy ... Good effort bro keep it up
Very nice video!
Agree👍... Nice work... Keep it up
No words to appreciate ❤ you
Allah apko lambi or khushal Zindagi ata farmaye😍🇦🇫
Outstanding
SUBHANALLAH ❤ i love your work
Absolutely fantastic presentation and summary. It is true that man is a limited being and perhaps can never know the absolute truth or the ultimate reality. However, the only faculties he has to his disposal are those or logic, reason, philosophy and rationality. Getting to the ultimate reality should not be his objective, because he cannot get to it (certainly not while being in a physical form at least). His objective should be to remain on a path of discovery towards this ultimate reality. And that comes through the use of logic and reason.
i was wating this video
Well done ❤
Great Content today...Masses rarely understand such deep facts...they are more interested in fairy tales..
Great video, very informative.
We should think rationally about the Quran and the ahkamat of Nabi SAW.
Great work bro. Keep it on please.
We need more people like u in the Muslim wolrd
অসাধারণ আলোচনা স্যার❤🇧🇩
আপনার সাহসকে অভিনন্দন জানাই ❤🇧🇩
Great work sir❤
Only through science we can under stand universe and its working.I agree with your ideas.
Good job ❤
My dear and respected brother ASRB, l am Saluate you, documentary present, keep it up, l am from Bangalore, lndia
Regards
A redressal to the Misconception
There is a common misconception among people (especially our Liberal and Secular brethren) who think that Ibn Rushd (May God mercy on him) was persecuted due to his subversion against traditional religious thought (unorthodoxy) and the dominance of rationalism and that he was an 'atheist philosopher'
While the reality of his persecution was purely due to personal and political reasons rather than religious reasons
Ibn e Rushd was a qadhi in Almohad caliphate .
Al mohad caliphate was founded by Ibn e Tumart a student of Imam Al Ghazali
Now didnt imam al ghazali who has being accused of being anti philosophy,his students weren't aware of his teachings ? Al mohads were known for their strictness and they allowed a Heretic philosopher to be qadhi for almost 40 years ? This doesn't make any sense and for almost 40 years the al mohads became anti philosophy suddenly and burnt his books ? If someone claims that the first rulers might not be aware of his works so that would just be a assumption because abdul momin bin ali the ruler of al mohads who ruled for 32 years used to call ibn e rushd and had philosophical discussions with him from the very start and even before ibn e rushd rose to prominence philosophers like ibn e tufail were already serving the court , the caliph himself asked ibn e tufail to translate Aristotle's works
The Al Mohads were very much into philosophy and theology themselves.
Abdul Momin established many institutions for philosophy and sciences and even took help of Ibn e Rushd which Ibn e Rushd discusses in his commentary on the work of Aristotle.
Al Mansur did ban the teaching of philosophy for sometime however he changed his mind and aborgaded the decision and even called back Ibn e Rushd.
Now let's see what really happens .
"And in the days of Ya'qub al-Mansur, Abu al-Walid Ibn Rushd faced strong opposition from him, for two reasons, one known and the other hidden. The hidden reason, which is the true one, is that when Ibn Rushd wrote a summary and commentary on Aristotle's book "The History of Animals," he wrote: "And I saw a giraffe in the garden of the Berber king." And in the same manner he would mention the king of any other region and people, because that is how writers typically do. But he forgot to take into account that those who serve the king should first praise him and observe his formal protocol. This greatly displeased the king, but he kept it to himself and did not show it, even though Abu al-Walid had written all of this with good intentions.
Then it happened that some of Abu al-Walid's enemies in Cordoba, who were jealous of him because of his knowledge and position and were always trying to humiliate him, went to the king Ya'qub al-Mansur and brought him some quotations from Abu al-Walid's own writings on ancient philosophy. They presented one of his passages out of context as follows: "This shows that Venus is one of the gods." The king summoned the governor and elders of Cordoba and asked Abu al-Walid in their presence: "Is this your writing?" Abu al-Walid denied it, so the king said: "May God curse whoever wrote this." And he ordered that Abu al-Walid be exiled and that all books of philosophy be collected and burned. And when I (the writer) was in Fez, I saw a very large number of books brought in on horses and burned.
(ʿAbd al-Wahid al-Marrākushī, al-Mūjib fī Talkhīṣ al-Akhbar al-Maghrib (The Pleasant Book in Summarizing the History of the West), p. 150-151 (1224))"
The passage begins by explaining that there were two reasons for Ibn Rushd's persecution. The first reason was that Ibn Rushd had written a passage in his commentary on Aristotle's "History of Animals" that mentioned a giraffe in the garden of the Berber king. This was considered to be a slight to the caliph, who was the Berber king.
The second reason for Ibn Rushd's persecution was that he had enemies who were jealous of his knowledge and position. These enemies went to the caliph and presented him with quotations from Ibn Rushd's writings on ancient philosophy that were taken out of context. The quotations were presented as evidence that Ibn Rushd was a heretic who was blasphemously equating Venus with one of the gods.
French orientalist ernest renan in his autobiography of ibn e rushd gives similar story where he says that in his commentary of republic ibn e rushd proclaimed superiority of his tribe over berbers this created unrest in the government thats why he was banned .
Majed fakhray in his book Averroes also agrees with the calling caliph Berber version of the story
In tabqat ul utba ibn usaybi says that ibn e rushd went to need the caliph daily and once called him akhi ( brother ) this made him angry and he also mentions the berber story
Sir thomas Arnold also says that what happened to ibn e rushd was due to political reasons .
The story that ibn e rushd was tortured because of Islam and he was a liberal atheist and mullahs hated him is rejected by researchers and historians , there were personal and political reasons he had to face almost a year exile and he was restored to his position after wards .
Now let's see how so called mullahs praised ibn e rushd in rijal books .
" قال ابن بشكوال : كان فقيها عالما ، حافظا للفقه ، مقدما فيه على جميع أهل عصره ، عارفا بالفتوى ، بصيرا بأقوال أئمة المالكية ، نافذا في علم الفرائض والأصول ، من أهل الرياسة في العلم ، والبراعة والفهم ، مع الدين والفضل ، والوقار والحلم ، والسمت الحسن ، والهدي الصالح. "
" ابن رشد
الإمام العلامة ، شيخ المالكية ، قاضي الجماعة بقرطبة أبو الوليد محمد بن أحمد بن أحمد بن رشد القرطبي المالكي .
تفقه بأبي جعفر أحمد بن رزق .
وحدث عنه ، وعن أبي مروا
I appreciate your comment on the topic
Appreciated your argument
nice
Amazing
Ibn Tumart was not a student of al Ghazali. This is a saying that was spread by al Maqrizi, it does not have any proof to it and is quite late.
Also, ibn Rushd served as Qadi, which is unrelated to aqeedah. Granted he was not an "atheist philosophers" as some liberal wish to believe but deeply trying to be a muslim [with little success but that's a side issue].
He also was not maliki per say as your quotation gives, rather he gave rulings upon it as qadi.
Edit: to add onto ibn Tumart being a student of al Ghazali, what is most likely is that he studied under one of al Ghazali's students. The time lapse where ibn Tumart and al Ghazali could have met is at best a year and half, insufficient to transmit usul, let alone furu' in 'aqeedah
Informative
Excellent content 👍🏻
Logical presentation.keep it up.
Amazing❤
Brilliant buddy 👌❤
Excellent video.
Incredible
From which books you study that, pls recommend....
Well done ; good work
Al Ghazzali is not the only one who claimed that science cannot give absolute truth. If you study the epistemology of science and study the philosophy of science you would find that it also says the same thing. Because science presupposes naturalistic worldview instead of proving it.
✴This video is a testimony of confirmation bias. Khawarizmi (unknown creed) and Ibn al Haythm were the top Muslim scientists. Ibn al Haythm's creed was Ashariah, which opposes Mutazillah. He emphasized not preferring reason over revelation, criticized Greek writings that they just spread ikhtalaf, and advocated for the scientific method. same for Razi and ibn Khaladun. Also, Gazzali was against the metaphysical (branch of philosophy that deals with the nature of reality, existence, time, and god) approach of philosophers...However, he supported science and rationality. He belonged to the Ashariah school of Ilm Kalam, which promotes the use of reason alongside revelation. Al-Ghazali stated that the greatest crime against religion is opposing science, and he considered pursuing any science that can help the community to grow as Farze Kafayah. Drawing a parallel, the transgressed statement by the late Stephen Hawking," Philosophy is dead and we don't need it anymore " doesn't necessarily mean he was against rationality. The Scientific Revolution marked a shift from the medieval Aristotelian worldview to a more quantitative and mechanistic approach to understanding the natural world.
@@hasixdyt7488You are right brother. This channel should be named "Half Baked Buddy" because he always brings things based on half baked knowledge
@@hasixdyt7488 you cannot deny the truth Islamic Golden age started only after the translation movement, the papermaking technique learnt from Chinese hugely supported this cause as well.
One of good vedio ever 🎉🎉
Great video ❤plz recommend some books about this topic
Here with a request
Review the book of ibn khaldun
Al Muqadimah
@BookBuddyOfficial
You're doing amazing work! I'm also on a journey to align rationality and faith in my life.
Question:
David Hume also proposes the idea that effects occur successively, and the first effect cannot be conclusively identified as the cause.
In my synthesis so far, Ghazali aimed to convey a similar idea by incorporating Allah into conversations instead of stifling rational thinking.
Perhaps, his theory of occasionalism has been misinterpreted by Muslims, offering an easy way out for them-hiding mistakes under the guise of fatalism or a predestined approach.
While Ghazali's theory of occasionalism may be correlated with the decline in Muslims' rational thought, it might not necessarily be the sole cause.
What are your thoughts?
Great
Great❤
Can you suggest any reading to learn more about these philosophers and scientists of abbasids era....
Imam Al-Ghazali was much more than what we Muslims have brought him down to. His orthodoxy was extremely intellectual. He git involved with Sufism because he had become a skeptic. And treated the skeptic in him with sufism.
Masha Allah I have fan your intellegency great dr sahab.
Mere zaathi khayal men is waqt pakistan men book buddy jaisa koi u tube chennel naheen hai aor na hi ap jaisa koi genius ankar ya vloger hai.
Faisal Warraich 🗿
Dekho Suno jano is also amazing
Alonwith wildlens by abrar
Syed Muzammil & Junaid Akram Also
Amazing sir
Ghazali is absolutely right as when the concept of quantum mechanics grew we concluded that his approaching towards right thing he puts a barrier to extremists that ruin religion and acceptance behind every phenomenon of nature away from allah
Is there any book available with these philosophers
Excellent
I have some questions to ask kindly respond..
What is the relevance of iqbal's philosophy or iqbal's epistemology in the present world
Another question iqbal's epistemology was similar with which westren empiricist philosopher ?
Another question what is the connection between epistemology and metaphysics?
Why we call iqbal as spiritual monist??
Please do reply whosoever know the correct answer
Appreciative job ❤
Wonderful ❤❤❤
Very well said about Al Ghazali and very few Muslims know this reality. Islam is not faith like other religions of worshipping but a conviction to belive in immutable laws of Allah. Nice video. Keep it up.
You've not even read 3 lines ghazali wrote lol
@@lordtaseen2947 you seem to be fond of mysticism and Islam doesn't endorse any idea of annihilating energy of man. Be mature and read Qur'an.
@@naturegirl4803 even the khawaij read the Quran, reading Quran isn't enough.
Reading it in context is important.
And I never said I like mysticism, all I'm saying is that you haven't read ghazali, ghazali opened my mind. Reading him was life-changing for me, at least read any of his works then tell us how valid this analysis is.
@@eastorwestedhiwasthebest4577(36:38) The sun is running its course to its appointed place. That is the ordaining of the All-Mighty, the All-Knowing. 33. “Place of rest” may either mean the place where the sun will ultimately come to a halt, or the time when it will come to a halt.
@@lordtaseen2947 What's wrong in mysticism? There are many scholars who are sufis
alkindi ko kory marny ka waqiya kis kitab mai hay.please point out the book name
wonderful beautiful
Love you bro from Balochistan ❤
Although I am not against rationality or science,but we cannot dump everything on clerics,it is responsiblity of every single muslim to be educated and rational.
Thank you for exposing the roots of irrationality in Muslim society.
My favorite philosophers Imam Ghazali and Moulana Rumi
Have not heard about Christian philosophers hindu philosophers, Jews philosophers but first time hearing about Muslim philosophers.
Today sudden while scrolling I found this knowledgeable channel which is mind blowing, thats 100%true mullaheiat ny muslims ko berbad diya
Sir Zindabad Great.❤
Very good video.... Science Hafiz
Clerics rationality se is liye darte the ke insan be adab ho jaata hai,ek kahawat hai,Ba adab ba naseeb bay adab badnaseeb.
The best
Pls is topic per book likkhe pls
وڈیو بہت پسند آئی
Superb!
All Islamic sects fell in this trap.Now The Islamic Republic Of Iran has laid a strong foundation for rationality that is why it is developing in each and every sphere by leaps and bounds.
Ur thoughts in this refard plz.
Can you provide sources?
Sir , recommend some basic books about rational muslim philosopher .
😲😳 wow
Have you read tahafatula filasifa by alghazali
I wish we could revive muatazila way of thinking today ❤
✴This video is a testimony of confirmation bias. Khawarizmi (unknown creed) and Ibn al Haythm were the top Muslim scientists. Ibn al Haythm's creed was Ashariah, which opposes Mutazillah. He emphasized not preferring reason over revelation, criticized Greek writings that they just spread ikhtalaf, and advocated for the scientific method. Same creed for Razi and ibn Khaladun. Also, Gazzali was against the metaphysical (branch of philosophy that deals with the nature of reality, existence, time, and god) approach of philosophers...However, he supported science and rationality. He belonged to the Ashariah school of Ilm Kalam, which promotes the use of reason alongside revelation. Al-Ghazali stated that the greatest crime against religion is opposing science, and he considered pursuing any science that can help the community to grow as Farze Kafayah. Drawing a parallel, the transgressed statement by the late Stephen Hawking," Philosophy is dead and we don't need it anymore " doesn't necessarily mean he was against rationality. The Scientific Revolution marked a shift from the medieval Aristotelian worldview to a more quantitative and mechanistic approach to understanding the natural world.
All these things don't matter today.
It is the result of suppressing rational thinking. Caliphs played a major role in suppressing these. Ottoman empire banned printing press stating it as invention of kuffar.
We can witness the state of Muslims today and their contribution to the scientific discoveries . How many noble prize winning scientists are Muslims? As compared to jews / Christians.
Loud speakers were considered haram, TV was considered haram, internet was considered haram. And everything became halal after few days? Only rational thinking can make Muslims to progress whether in filed of science and technology. geopolitics or any other aspect.
Read Allama ghulam ahmed pervez sb...you will find cent to cent logical interpretation of Quran .
The explanation book budy produced here of surah, its the replica of what pervez sb has written in his MAFHOOM UL QURAN
Yeah agree
Nah we don't want another minha
You are doing a wonderful job
sorry to say sir,
what is Mohzza,Karamat, aura, spiritual & what is Maquf-e-fatharat thinking?
if all things is sciences?
Any solution of anxiety pain
Sir any reference to these events
How logic shape the religious thoughts in last 500 years? Need your views on this topic.
No doubt beyond everything is science or scientific laws. But beyond every science or scientific laws there is Allah.
Then why did he not reveal those laws in his divine scriptures?
@@deepsareen1ye Banda akal ka dusman h. Isse bahas ka koi fayda nahi. Ye her chiz me alla ghusedega.
How awful what we (Muslims) have done with ourselves.
Thank you @bookbuddy for sharing your knowledge and insight with us.
what is your own research work?
Kindly discuss Al gazali relation with Ismailis at that time
❤
Really need of hour
Jabardast
Doing Amazing Sir❤🎉
Sir your explanation is full And final.
Sir,
I think it is not impossible to run vehicles with water instead of Diesel by converting water back to Hydrogen and Oxygen gases which work as fuel.
what are belifs of them regarding Toheed, justice
WHAT ARE METAPHYSICS ?