Rational Islam vs Al-Ghazali - Great Muslim Philosophers - Islam & Science (Part 3)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
- Join my Whatsapp Channel on below link
whatsapp.com/c...
Watch complete series "Islam and Science" • Islam & Science
🌌 Embark on a mesmerizing journey through the corridors of Islamic intellectual history in part 3 of my series, "Islam and Science."📜✨ Part 3 delves deep into the remarkable lives of five Muslim visionaries-Al-Kindi, Al-Razi, Ibn Sina, Ibn Rushd, and Ibn Khaldun-whose intellectual brilliance and unyielding pursuit of knowledge placed them at odds with religious orthodoxy. 🤯💡
🔍 Uncover the rich tapestry of Al-Kindi's pioneering work in translating Greek philosophical texts, Al-Razi's groundbreaking contributions to medicine and alchemy, Ibn Sina's monumental "Canon of Medicine," Ibn Rushd's eloquent defense of reason, and Ibn Khaldun's profound insights into history and sociology. 🌐📚
But the plot thickens! In the second segment, we shine a light on the enigmatic Al-Ghazali. Revered for his theological contributions, Al-Ghazali's orthodox ideas inadvertently triggered a decline in rationality, leaving an indelible mark on Muslim civilization. 🌌🔍
👁️🗨️ Witness the clash of ideas and the consequences of dissent as we explore the intricate dance between faith and reason during this pivotal era in Islamic history. 🚀🤔 Don't miss this riveting episode where philosophical titans challenge the status quo, shaping the course of history with their unapologetic pursuit of truth.
🎥 Join us in unraveling the secrets of intellectual rebellion, where icons clash, ideas collide, and the echoes of these heretic philosophers resound through the ages. 🌍✨ #IslamAndScience #PhilosophyTrailblazers #HereticPhilosophers #IslamicIntellectuals #UnveilingHistory #FaithVsReason #KnowledgeRevolution 🚀
Join my Whatsapp Channel
whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va80Cgj23n3ZTl5Gbq16
Order My bestselling book Readistan on the below link in Pakistan
www.libertybooks.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=110840
Order Readistan on Amazon India on the below link
amzn.to/3MQxxec
Order Readistan in Amazon USA on the below link
bitly.ws/32TKL
Order Readistan on Barnes and Noble USA on the below link
www.barnesandnoble.com/w/book/1144385414?ean=9786277626037
Order Readistan on Amazon UK on the below link
bitly.ws/33SkK
You can get 20% discount on the biggest bookstore chain in Pakistan libertybooks.com by using coupon code “bookbuddy” on their website. Shop as much as you want. (Minimum shopping Rs. 2500)
Useful links:
Islam and Science: t.ly/zqGG-
Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam: t.ly/zqGG-
Psychology & Philosophy Books: t.ly/zqGG-
Motivational & Self Help Books: t.ly/QcQE0
Islam and science made me.laigh. 😂
Sasta youtuber ho tum😡 jo arguement ghazali ke against sab dete hain ,wahi chipka rha hai idhar😡 ghazali ko bilkul bhi padha nahi hai tumne
Har cheez kay pechay science hay... Magar har science kay pichay Allah hay.. Yahi Ghazali ka paighaam hay.
For religion to exist it is necessary for a superstition to enslave philosophy.
There’s no point blaming Ghazali. Those who blame Ghazali never read him. Otherwise they would not miss that Kant and Hume were taking a similar approach to philosophy from an agnostic approach. The principle of causality for instance. Which Ghazali wrote 700 years ago.
Al-Ghazali believed that the natural laws that govern the world are simply patterns that God has established and that God can choose to alter these patterns at any time. Therefore, in the occasionalist view, the laws of nature are not immutable, but are contingent on God's will.
✴This video is a testimony of confirmation bias. Khawarizmi (unknown creed) and Ibn al Haythm were the top Muslim scientists. Ibn al Haythm's creed was Ashariah, which opposes Mutazillah. He emphasized not preferring reason over revelation, criticized Greek writings that they just spread ikhtalaf, and advocated for the scientific method. same for Razi and ibn Khaladun. Also, Gazzali was against the metaphysical (branch of philosophy that deals with the nature of reality, existence, time, and god) approach of philosophers...However, he supported science and rationality. He belonged to the Ashariah school of Ilm Kalam, which promotes the use of reason alongside revelation. Al-Ghazali stated that the greatest crime against religion is opposing science, and he considered pursuing any science that can help the community to grow as Farze Kafayah. Drawing a parallel, the transgressed statement by the late Stephen Hawking," Philosophy is dead and we don't need it anymore " doesn't necessarily mean he was against rationality. The Scientific Revolution marked a shift from the medieval Aristotelian worldview to a more quantitative and mechanistic approach to understanding the natural world.
@@hasixdyt7488 I also adore science but in modern world science is also a problem because it's standing on the metaphysical position of materialism and scientism. We have to purify the science from this too.
@@mfaseeh.skh7 Yeah. I agree
Jhoot mat bol,tu hai kaun chal nikal
@@Happiness-w5p Low-IQ people just get in a defensive mood...If you have any evidence that we are lying then provide it...Ap ki tarah kay dumb log idhr udhr sai suni sunai batein sach samjh lete hein...
بے شک اللّٰہ سبحانہ و تعالیٰ کے حکم سے ہی کائنات کا ہر کام ہوتا ہے ، اللّٰہ کے حکم سے تمام مخلوقات اور تمام قدرتی معاملات ہوتے ہیں الحمد للّٰہ ۔۔۔
Sure; so Israelis are killing Gazans by the orders of same Allah!
Ye galat fahmi mat pala kar bhai, koi god, koi allah ne duniya nahi banaya hain
No words to appreciate ur incredible thoughts. 🌸 Moula apko hamisha salamt rakhy ameen
بہترین۔۔۔۔۔مزہب اور علم کے مطلق ایسی ویڈیوز لازمی مولویوں کو ضرور دیکھنا اور سمجھنا چاہیۓ۔۔۔۔بہت اجھی لگی ویڈیو۔۔۔۔۔
YES ALLAH MADE THESE UNIVERSAL LAWS..BUT HE CAN CHANGE IT ANYTIME..
If Allah made the Universal Laws why we do not see them in Quran (or any other Religious Texts) ?
Allah is Man made concept
@@deepsareen1 Have u red whole Quran? Or do u know arabic linguistic?
@@angeleyes8602
I have read official english translation (and heard urdu audio book) of Quran. Have you read Arabic versiion? If yes which one because there are many?
@@deepsareen1 Many arabic versions? Really?😂
@@angeleyes8602
Apologies for noticing your reply (and responding) so late.
Yes there are over two dozen Qurans known to exist today.
While the Quran that most Muslims recite now is 1924 Hafs an Asim version (from Al Azhar Univ. Cairo) it is different from versions used in Morocco and Algeria (i.e. Warsh and Kalun) today.
Importantly, at the time of said revelation of Quran there were no diacritic marks (they determine the pronunciation and change therein can cause a change in meaning) existing in Arabic. There are Hadiths (i.e. Sahih Muslim: 818 & 819, Tirmidhi: 2943, 2944) quoting Mohammed that Quran was revealed in 7 Ahruf (differing in wording or accents or dialects) so any one can be used as per ease. Hence, there were 7 Qirats (recitations) of Quran in existence around times of death of Mohammed (i.e. Nafi‘ al-Madani, Ibn Kathir al-Makki, Aasim ibn Abi al-Najud, Ibn Amir ad-Dimashqi, Hamzah az-Zaiyyat, Abu Amr of Basra, and Al-Kisa'i.) The implication is that these Qira'at have differences in diacritics (i‘jām, ḥarakāt and rasm), resulting in materially different readings. This has by now been amply substantiated and agreed to by Quranists like Yasir Qadih, Shabir Ali etc. (th-cam.com/video/vstGbZkjUcw/w-d-xo.html).
Next, the comparison of the four earliest texts i.e. Birmingham Manuscript which is oldest (568 and 645 CE), Sanaa Manuscript (632-669 CE); both written in Hajazi Arabic, Topkapi Manuscript (Mid 8th century CE) and Samarkand Manuscript (775-895 CE);both in written in Kufic Arabic shows that there are numerous omissions, corrections and insertions within and amongst these early Quran manuscripts. For instance the Sanaa manuscript is a palimpsest same parchment overwritten after erasing earlier text) wherein a study of just 11 folios showed the earlier text having 61 (non-orthographic) differences with 1924 Cairo edition.
So that is what I wanted to bring to your notice while asking which version you read.
Ghazali is absolutely right as when the concept of quantum mechanics grew we concluded that his approaching towards right thing he puts a barrier to extremists that ruin religion and acceptance behind every phenomenon of nature away from allah
This youtuber is narrow minded and that's why he refuted the great Scholar, the Proof of Islam (Hujjat ul Islam), Imam Gazali RA.
Imam Gazali told the truth. That although things happen according to the universal laws such as fire will always burn cotton, BUT these universal laws are themselves set by Allah and if Allah wants, he can change these laws for certain things such as changing the law of fire to save His Prophet Ibrahim AS, whereas the general law of fire remained the same all around the world. And that's why Imam Gazali said that fire will not burn cotton UNLESS Allah wants the fire to burn the cotton. It's such a simple concept but this book buddy didn't use basic critical thinking when he came to criticise the Great Scholar who saved the muslims at a time when Islam was just on the brink of failure. Allah set the universal and scientific laws, so everything will happen according to those laws, but if Allah wants, he can change these laws itself for some reason, so in essense, it's no doubt Allah HIMSELF who burns the cotton, not the fire, since fire is just obeying the law Allah set for it. Why can't this book buddy understand this simple concept especially when he has read thousands of books. I learnt that critical and logical thinking comes from intuition and reflection, not by reading thousands of books like the book buddy. And Al Gazali himself encouraged to learn and understand science and maths but he just told us to remain conscience of not letting this knowledge destroy our Aqeedah which says that nothing happens, not even a leaf falls without the permission of Allah (according to an Ayah of Quran).
No words to appreciate ❤ you
Allah apko lambi or khushal Zindagi ata farmaye😍🇦🇫
A redressal to the Misconception
There is a common misconception among people (especially our Liberal and Secular brethren) who think that Ibn Rushd (May God mercy on him) was persecuted due to his subversion against traditional religious thought (unorthodoxy) and the dominance of rationalism and that he was an 'atheist philosopher'
While the reality of his persecution was purely due to personal and political reasons rather than religious reasons
Ibn e Rushd was a qadhi in Almohad caliphate .
Al mohad caliphate was founded by Ibn e Tumart a student of Imam Al Ghazali
Now didnt imam al ghazali who has being accused of being anti philosophy,his students weren't aware of his teachings ? Al mohads were known for their strictness and they allowed a Heretic philosopher to be qadhi for almost 40 years ? This doesn't make any sense and for almost 40 years the al mohads became anti philosophy suddenly and burnt his books ? If someone claims that the first rulers might not be aware of his works so that would just be a assumption because abdul momin bin ali the ruler of al mohads who ruled for 32 years used to call ibn e rushd and had philosophical discussions with him from the very start and even before ibn e rushd rose to prominence philosophers like ibn e tufail were already serving the court , the caliph himself asked ibn e tufail to translate Aristotle's works
The Al Mohads were very much into philosophy and theology themselves.
Abdul Momin established many institutions for philosophy and sciences and even took help of Ibn e Rushd which Ibn e Rushd discusses in his commentary on the work of Aristotle.
Al Mansur did ban the teaching of philosophy for sometime however he changed his mind and aborgaded the decision and even called back Ibn e Rushd.
Now let's see what really happens .
"And in the days of Ya'qub al-Mansur, Abu al-Walid Ibn Rushd faced strong opposition from him, for two reasons, one known and the other hidden. The hidden reason, which is the true one, is that when Ibn Rushd wrote a summary and commentary on Aristotle's book "The History of Animals," he wrote: "And I saw a giraffe in the garden of the Berber king." And in the same manner he would mention the king of any other region and people, because that is how writers typically do. But he forgot to take into account that those who serve the king should first praise him and observe his formal protocol. This greatly displeased the king, but he kept it to himself and did not show it, even though Abu al-Walid had written all of this with good intentions.
Then it happened that some of Abu al-Walid's enemies in Cordoba, who were jealous of him because of his knowledge and position and were always trying to humiliate him, went to the king Ya'qub al-Mansur and brought him some quotations from Abu al-Walid's own writings on ancient philosophy. They presented one of his passages out of context as follows: "This shows that Venus is one of the gods." The king summoned the governor and elders of Cordoba and asked Abu al-Walid in their presence: "Is this your writing?" Abu al-Walid denied it, so the king said: "May God curse whoever wrote this." And he ordered that Abu al-Walid be exiled and that all books of philosophy be collected and burned. And when I (the writer) was in Fez, I saw a very large number of books brought in on horses and burned.
(ʿAbd al-Wahid al-Marrākushī, al-Mūjib fī Talkhīṣ al-Akhbar al-Maghrib (The Pleasant Book in Summarizing the History of the West), p. 150-151 (1224))"
The passage begins by explaining that there were two reasons for Ibn Rushd's persecution. The first reason was that Ibn Rushd had written a passage in his commentary on Aristotle's "History of Animals" that mentioned a giraffe in the garden of the Berber king. This was considered to be a slight to the caliph, who was the Berber king.
The second reason for Ibn Rushd's persecution was that he had enemies who were jealous of his knowledge and position. These enemies went to the caliph and presented him with quotations from Ibn Rushd's writings on ancient philosophy that were taken out of context. The quotations were presented as evidence that Ibn Rushd was a heretic who was blasphemously equating Venus with one of the gods.
French orientalist ernest renan in his autobiography of ibn e rushd gives similar story where he says that in his commentary of republic ibn e rushd proclaimed superiority of his tribe over berbers this created unrest in the government thats why he was banned .
Majed fakhray in his book Averroes also agrees with the calling caliph Berber version of the story
In tabqat ul utba ibn usaybi says that ibn e rushd went to need the caliph daily and once called him akhi ( brother ) this made him angry and he also mentions the berber story
Sir thomas Arnold also says that what happened to ibn e rushd was due to political reasons .
The story that ibn e rushd was tortured because of Islam and he was a liberal atheist and mullahs hated him is rejected by researchers and historians , there were personal and political reasons he had to face almost a year exile and he was restored to his position after wards .
Now let's see how so called mullahs praised ibn e rushd in rijal books .
" قال ابن بشكوال : كان فقيها عالما ، حافظا للفقه ، مقدما فيه على جميع أهل عصره ، عارفا بالفتوى ، بصيرا بأقوال أئمة المالكية ، نافذا في علم الفرائض والأصول ، من أهل الرياسة في العلم ، والبراعة والفهم ، مع الدين والفضل ، والوقار والحلم ، والسمت الحسن ، والهدي الصالح. "
" ابن رشد
الإمام العلامة ، شيخ المالكية ، قاضي الجماعة بقرطبة أبو الوليد محمد بن أحمد بن أحمد بن رشد القرطبي المالكي .
تفقه بأبي جعفر أحمد بن رزق .
وحدث عنه ، وعن أبي مروا
I appreciate your comment on the topic
Appreciated your argument
nice
Amazing
Ibn Tumart was not a student of al Ghazali. This is a saying that was spread by al Maqrizi, it does not have any proof to it and is quite late.
Also, ibn Rushd served as Qadi, which is unrelated to aqeedah. Granted he was not an "atheist philosophers" as some liberal wish to believe but deeply trying to be a muslim [with little success but that's a side issue].
He also was not maliki per say as your quotation gives, rather he gave rulings upon it as qadi.
Edit: to add onto ibn Tumart being a student of al Ghazali, what is most likely is that he studied under one of al Ghazali's students. The time lapse where ibn Tumart and al Ghazali could have met is at best a year and half, insufficient to transmit usul, let alone furu' in 'aqeedah
Great Content today...Masses rarely understand such deep facts...they are more interested in fairy tales..
This youtuber is narrow minded and that's why he refuted the great Scholar, the Proof of Islam (Hujjat ul Islam), Imam Gazali RA.
Imam Gazali told the truth. That although things happen according to the universal laws such as fire will always burn cotton, BUT these universal laws are themselves set by Allah and if Allah wants, he can change these laws for certain things such as changing the law of fire to save His Prophet Ibrahim AS, whereas the general law of fire remained the same all around the world. And that's why Imam Gazali said that fire will not burn cotton UNLESS Allah wants the fire to burn the cotton. It's such a simple concept but this book buddy didn't use basic critical thinking when he came to criticise the Great Scholar who saved the muslims at a time when Islam was just on the brink of failure. Allah set the universal and scientific laws, so everything will happen according to those laws, but if Allah wants, he can change these laws itself for some reason, so in essense, it's no doubt Allah HIMSELF who burns the cotton, not the fire, since fire is just obeying the law Allah set for it. Why can't this book buddy understand this simple concept especially when he has read thousands of books. I learnt that critical and logical thinking comes from intuition and reflection, not by reading thousands of books like the book buddy. And Al Gazali himself encouraged to learn and understand science and maths but he just told us to remain conscience of not letting this knowledge destroy our Aqeedah which says that nothing happens, not even a leaf falls without the permission of Allah (according to an Ayah of Quran).
Absolutely fantastic presentation and summary. It is true that man is a limited being and perhaps can never know the absolute truth or the ultimate reality. However, the only faculties he has to his disposal are those or logic, reason, philosophy and rationality. Getting to the ultimate reality should not be his objective, because he cannot get to it (certainly not while being in a physical form at least). His objective should be to remain on a path of discovery towards this ultimate reality. And that comes through the use of logic and reason.
Wawo wawo wawo...
Can't quench my thirst with philosophy and love for wisdom ❤❤❤❤ can't can't can't quench....
Wish u more power
My favorite philosophers Imam Ghazali and Moulana Rumi
Sir , I have read both books "The incoherence of Philosophy " and the " Incoherence of Incoherence " ....Believe me sir , Today I feel delighted that i have subscribed your Channel...You are such becon of Hope ,Light of wisdom against this all pervasive ignorance..Usually am not are person who like to do comments under vedios but today i feel obliged to do so.. ❤️❤️
😊👍🏻
مسلمان سائنس دانوں پر ظلم کے غیر ثابت واقعات! part 1
==========================
سوشل میڈیا پر کافی عرصہ سے ایک پوسٹ گردش کر رہی ہے جس کے مطابق مسلمان سائنسدانوں کے ساتھ مسلمانوں نے بہت عبرتناک رویہ رکھا۔۔۔ہو سکتا ہے ان باتوں میں کچھ کسی حد تک درست بھی ہوں مگر زیادہ تر غیر ثابت شدہ ہیں ۔۔۔۔اِس تحریر میں اُن سائنسدانوں کے حالات و واقعات مستند حوالہ جات کے ذریعے بیان کیے گئے ہیں !
۱) یعقوب بن اسحاق الکندی:
ان تحریر لکھنے والوں کے مطابق یعقوب بن اسحاق الکندی پر "مُلّا" کی وجہ سے تشدد کیا گیا، ان کا کتب خانہ ضبط گیا۔ اس کو سرِ عام کوڑے مارے گئے اور اس کو جب کوڑے مارے جاتے تھے، تو لوگ ہنستے تھے۔ الکندی معتزلہ کے دور میں پیدا ہوئے تھے جب مامون الرشید اور معتصم باللہ جیسے عباسی خلفاء کے دور میں پیدا ہوا تھا۔ معتصم اور مامون معتزلی اور یونانی فلسفہ کے حامی تھے۔ معتصم ہی نے تو امام احمدؓ پر خوب ظلم کیا تھا کیونکہ وہ معتزلہ کے عقائد کو مسترد کرتے تھے۔
مامون الرشید میں بھی اعتزال تھا۔ حوالے کے طور پر علّامہ شبلی نعمانیؒ کی کتاب "المامون" دیکھ لیجیئے۔ [المامون، صفحہ نمبر ۱۶۱-۱۶۲] یہ لوگ کسی کو فلسفہ کی بنیاد پر کیونکر سزا دے سکتے ہیں؟ اور یعقوب کی سیرت پر ابن صاعد الاندلسیؒ نے اپنی کتاب "طبقات الأمم" میں ذکر کیا ہے مگر اس میں ایسی کسی بات کا ذکر نہیں کہ اس کو مارا گیا یا کوڑے لگائے گئے ہوں۔ [طبقات الأمم لابن صاعد الأندلسي، صفحہ نمبر ۵۱] اس کے علاوہ دیگر مؤرخین نے بھی ان کا ذکر اپنی کتابوں میں کیا ہے مگر ایسی کسی بات کا ذکر نہیں کیا۔
البتہ بڑی مشکل سے ایک روایت ملی ہے جس کے مطابق عباسی خلیفہ "متوکل" نے یعقوب الکندی کو مارا تھا۔ [الوافي بالوفيات، جلد ۱۵، صفحہ نمبر ۲۹۴] مگر اس میں بھی لوگوں کے ہنسنے کا کہیں ذکر نہیں، اور وہ دیگر تفصیلات جو بیان کی گئی ہیں، وہ اس میں موجود نہیں ہے۔ اور یہ روایت غیر مستند بھی ہے۔ اس کا راوی ابو کامل الحاسب مجہول ہے۔ [لسان الميزان، جلد ۳، صفحہ نمبر ۱۶۳] ایسی روایت سے کچھ ثابت نہیں ہوتا۔ اور ہنسنے اور لوگوں کے قہقہ لگانے کے حوالے سے بقیہ باتیں بھی اپنے مبالغے سے انہوں نے شامل کی ہیں، ان کا تو اس روایت میں بھی کہیں ذکر نہیں۔
۲) علّامہ ابو الولید ابنِ رشد رحمہ اللہ:
ایک دعویٰ یہ بھی کیا گیا کہ جنابِ ابنِ رشد کو "بے دین" قرار دیا گیا اور پھر ان کی کتابوں کو جلادیا گیا۔ پھر جامع مسجد کے ستون پر باندھ کر ابنِ رشد کے منہ پر لوگوں نے تھوکنا شروع کردیا۔ اس "ٰعظیم" عالم نے زندگی آخری دن ذلّت اور گُمنامی میں گذار دی۔ مولویوں نے کیا واقعی علّامہ ابنِ رشدؒ کے حوالے سے کبھی ایسا کچھ کہا؟ علّامہ ابن ابی صبیعہ رحمہ اللہ ان کے متعلق فرماتے ہیں:
كان أوحد في الفقه والخلاف، وبرع في الطب
ترجمہ: وہ فقہ و خلاف میں یکتا (اپنی شان) رکھتے تھے، اور علومِ طب کے ماہر تھے۔
[يون الأنباء في طبقات الأطباء، جلد ۳، صفحہ نمبر ۳۱۹]
علّامہ ذہبیؒ ان کے متعلق مدح کرتے ہوئے فرماتے ہیں:
وكان يُفزع إلى فتياه في الطب، كما يُفزع إلى فتياه في الفقه، مع وفور العربية، وقيل: كان يحفظ ديوان أبي تمام والمتنبي.
[سير أعلام النبلاء، جلد ۲۱، صفحہ نمبر ۳۱۸]
یعنی علومِ طب اور علومِ فقہ میں ان جیسا کوئی نہ تھا اور انہوں نے ابو تمام اور منتبی کے دیوان بھی حفظ کیے ہوئے تھے۔
فقہ مالکی کی کتاب "بداية المجتهد ونهاية المقتصد" ایک زبردست فقہ کی کتاب ہے جو علّامہ ابنِ رشد نے لکھی تھی۔ امام مالکؒ کی کتاب موطا امام مالکؒ کو آپؒ نے حفظ کیا تھا۔ مشہور محدث و حافظ محمد بن رزق رحمہ اللہ کے آپ شاگرد تھے۔ اس کے علاوہ علومِ دین پر مناهج الأدلة في عقائد الملة میں اسلام کے عقائد کو آپ نے ثابت کرنے کے لیے تویل فلسفیانہ ابواب باندھے ہیں۔ ان کی کتاب "بداية" کو فقہ میں اچھی خاصی شہرت حاصل ہے اور اس کی شروحات تک سعودیہ عرب وغیرہ سے شائع ہوچکی ہیں۔ اور علماء نے بڑی عزت سے ان کا تذکرہ کیا ہے۔
مگر ان مولویوں نے اس تحریر کے مطابق ابنِ رشد کو "دین بیزار" کہا ہے جس کا کوئی ثبوت نہیں ہے۔ اور قاضی ابنِ رشدؒ اشبیلہ کے قاضی بھی رہ چکے تھے۔ ان کو حکومت نے ہی اس منصب پر فائز کیا تھا۔ [ابن رشد والرشدية، صفحہ نمبر ۴۴۶] ارنست ریحان نے اپنی کتاب "ابن رشد والرشدية" کے قطعات میں تمام سابقہ سیرتوں سے ابنِ رشد کا ذکر نقل کیا ہے، مگر میں نے کہیں بھی یہ جامع مسجد میں تھوکنے والی بات نہیں پڑھی ہے۔ یہ تو خدا ہی جانتا ہے کہ کونسی روایت میں ہے۔
ہاں، ابنِ رشد کی سزا کا ذکر ملتا ہے۔ مگر کیا کسی مُلّا کی وجہ سے سزا ہوئی تھی؟ ہرگز بھی نہیں! طبیب ابن ابی صبیعہ کے مطابق وجہ یہ تھی کہ ابنِ رشد نے اپنی کتاب الحیوان میں خلیفہ منصور کو "الملك البربر" کہہ دیا تھا جس کے معنی اچھے نہیں بنتے۔ غلطی سے تصحیف ہوگئی اور "الملك البرين" کی جگہ بادشاہ کو "بربر" کہہ دیا گیا جس پر بادشاہ کو غصّہ آیا اور اس نے سزا دی۔ [ابن رشد والرشدية، صفحہ نمبر ۴۴۸]
اس میں کسی مولوی کا کیا قصور تھا یا کیا قصور ہے؟ یہ کام انگلستان میں اگر کوئی سائنس دان کرتا، تو ایک دو صدی پہلے اس کا بھی یہی حشر ہوتا بلکہ اس سے شاید اس سے بھی بُری حالت ہوتی۔ یہی کام پچھلی صدی جرمنی میں کوئی کرتا تو شاید مار دیا جاتا، ابنِ رشد تو زندہ رکھا گیا اور صرف اپنے گھر میں نظر بند کیا گیا تھا۔ اگرچہ ان کے ثبوت بھی قطعی الثبوت نہیں ہیں، مشکوک ہوسکتے ہیں مگر ایسی باتیں کہیں بھی نہیں جو مشہور کی جارہی ہیں۔
اور میرا ایک سوال ہے، اگر واقعی ساری کتابیں جلادی تھیں، تو آج دنیا بھر میں ابنِ رشد کی ہر موضوع پر کوئی نہ کوئی کتاب کیسے موجود ہے؟ کونسی کتاب جلائی گئی؟ ہمیں بھی بتائیں۔ کیسا بیوقوفانہ اعتراض ہے؟ اس طرح تو کوئی کتاب ہی آپ تک نہیں پہنچنی چاہیئے تھی۔
و میرے علم میں اس کا کوئی ثبوت نہیں ہے۔
Brother could you tell me how you access them I've searched every bookshops and library in Peshawar but I failed
You spoken exactly what I think. This third video is more better than previous two.
Imam Ghazali is is one of the best among them.
Very well said about Al Ghazali and very few Muslims know this reality. Islam is not faith like other religions of worshipping but a conviction to belive in immutable laws of Allah. Nice video. Keep it up.
You've not even read 3 lines ghazali wrote lol
@@lordtaseen2947 you seem to be fond of mysticism and Islam doesn't endorse any idea of annihilating energy of man. Be mature and read Qur'an.
@@naturegirl4803 even the khawaij read the Quran, reading Quran isn't enough.
Reading it in context is important.
And I never said I like mysticism, all I'm saying is that you haven't read ghazali, ghazali opened my mind. Reading him was life-changing for me, at least read any of his works then tell us how valid this analysis is.
@@eastorwestedhiwasthebest4577(36:38) The sun is running its course to its appointed place. That is the ordaining of the All-Mighty, the All-Knowing. 33. “Place of rest” may either mean the place where the sun will ultimately come to a halt, or the time when it will come to a halt.
@@lordtaseen2947 What's wrong in mysticism? There are many scholars who are sufis
Looking forward to seeing more from you. ❤
Only through science we can under stand universe and its working.I agree with your ideas.
This youtuber is narrow minded and that's why he refuted the great Scholar, the Proof of Islam (Hujjat ul Islam), Imam Gazali RA.
Imam Gazali told the truth. That although things happen according to the universal laws such as fire will always burn cotton, BUT these universal laws are themselves set by Allah and if Allah wants, he can change these laws for certain things such as changing the law of fire to save His Prophet Ibrahim AS, whereas the general law of fire remained the same all around the world. And that's why Imam Gazali said that fire will not burn cotton UNLESS Allah wants the fire to burn the cotton. It's such a simple concept but this book buddy didn't use basic critical thinking when he came to criticise the Great Scholar who saved the muslims at a time when Islam was just on the brink of failure. Allah set the universal and scientific laws, so everything will happen according to those laws, but if Allah wants, he can change these laws itself for some reason, so in essense, it's no doubt Allah HIMSELF who burns the cotton, not the fire, since fire is just obeying the law Allah set for it. Why can't this book buddy understand this simple concept especially when he has read thousands of books. I learnt that critical and logical thinking comes from intuition and reflection, not by reading thousands of books like the book buddy. And Al Gazali himself encouraged to learn and understand science and maths but he just told us to remain conscience of not letting this knowledge destroy our Aqeedah which says that nothing happens, not even a leaf falls without the permission of Allah (according to an Ayah of Quran).
Thank you for creating this type of quality content
🙂
Love you Dear, best job you are doing in this Orthodox society. God bless upon you. Ameen
I was waiting for this ❤
بہت اعلی زبردست❤❤
Bhai sorry bohot der ho gayi aap se mulakat hone me yarr great content with explanation
Excellent, glad to bump into this channel , now subscribed.
Religious Interpretations are changed timely according to governments, social, political and cultural changes.
Al Ghazzali is not the only one who claimed that science cannot give absolute truth. If you study the epistemology of science and study the philosophy of science you would find that it also says the same thing. Because science presupposes naturalistic worldview instead of proving it.
✴This video is a testimony of confirmation bias. Khawarizmi (unknown creed) and Ibn al Haythm were the top Muslim scientists. Ibn al Haythm's creed was Ashariah, which opposes Mutazillah. He emphasized not preferring reason over revelation, criticized Greek writings that they just spread ikhtalaf, and advocated for the scientific method. same for Razi and ibn Khaladun. Also, Gazzali was against the metaphysical (branch of philosophy that deals with the nature of reality, existence, time, and god) approach of philosophers...However, he supported science and rationality. He belonged to the Ashariah school of Ilm Kalam, which promotes the use of reason alongside revelation. Al-Ghazali stated that the greatest crime against religion is opposing science, and he considered pursuing any science that can help the community to grow as Farze Kafayah. Drawing a parallel, the transgressed statement by the late Stephen Hawking," Philosophy is dead and we don't need it anymore " doesn't necessarily mean he was against rationality. The Scientific Revolution marked a shift from the medieval Aristotelian worldview to a more quantitative and mechanistic approach to understanding the natural world.
@@hasixdyt7488You are right brother. This channel should be named "Half Baked Buddy" because he always brings things based on half baked knowledge
@@hasixdyt7488 you cannot deny the truth Islamic Golden age started only after the translation movement, the papermaking technique learnt from Chinese hugely supported this cause as well.
This youtuber is narrow minded and that's why he refuted the great Scholar, the Proof of Islam (Hujjat ul Islam), Imam Gazali RA.
Imam Gazali told the truth. That although things happen according to the universal laws such as fire will always burn cotton, BUT these universal laws are themselves set by Allah and if Allah wants, he can change these laws for certain things such as changing the law of fire to save His Prophet Ibrahim AS, whereas the general law of fire remained the same all around the world. And that's why Imam Gazali said that fire will not burn cotton UNLESS Allah wants the fire to burn the cotton. It's such a simple concept but this book buddy didn't use basic critical thinking when he came to criticise the Great Scholar who saved the muslims at a time when Islam was just on the brink of failure. Allah set the universal and scientific laws, so everything will happen according to those laws, but if Allah wants, he can change these laws itself for some reason, so in essense, it's no doubt Allah HIMSELF who burns the cotton, not the fire, since fire is just obeying the law Allah set for it. Why can't this book buddy understand this simple concept especially when he has read thousands of books. I learnt that critical and logical thinking comes from intuition and reflection, not by reading thousands of books like the book buddy. And Al Gazali himself encouraged to learn and understand science and maths but he just told us to remain conscience of not letting this knowledge destroy our Aqeedah which says that nothing happens, not even a leaf falls without the permission of Allah (according to an Ayah of Quran).
অসাধারণ আলোচনা স্যার❤🇧🇩
আপনার সাহসকে অভিনন্দন জানাই ❤🇧🇩
The great youtuber in Pakistan ❤
Mere zaathi khayal men is waqt pakistan men book buddy jaisa koi u tube chennel naheen hai aor na hi ap jaisa koi genius ankar ya vloger hai.
Faisal Warraich 🗿
Dekho Suno jano is also amazing
Alonwith wildlens by abrar
Syed Muzammil & Junaid Akram Also
Thank you for exposing the roots of irrationality in Muslim society.
This youtuber is narrow minded and that's why he refuted the great Scholar, the Proof of Islam (Hujjat ul Islam), Imam Gazali RA.
Imam Gazali told the truth. That although things happen according to the universal laws such as fire will always burn cotton, BUT these universal laws are themselves set by Allah and if Allah wants, he can change these laws for certain things such as changing the law of fire to save His Prophet Ibrahim AS, whereas the general law of fire remained the same all around the world. And that's why Imam Gazali said that fire will not burn cotton UNLESS Allah wants the fire to burn the cotton. It's such a simple concept but this book buddy didn't use basic critical thinking when he came to criticise the Great Scholar who saved the muslims at a time when Islam was just on the brink of failure. Allah set the universal and scientific laws, so everything will happen according to those laws, but if Allah wants, he can change these laws itself for some reason, so in essense, it's no doubt Allah HIMSELF who burns the cotton, not the fire, since fire is just obeying the law Allah set for it. Why can't this book buddy understand this simple concept especially when he has read thousands of books. I learnt that critical and logical thinking comes from intuition and reflection, not by reading thousands of books like the book buddy. And Al Gazali himself encouraged to learn and understand science and maths but he just told us to remain conscience of not letting this knowledge destroy our Aqeedah which says that nothing happens, not even a leaf falls without the permission of Allah (according to an Ayah of Quran).
Ghazali was the first person who refute science and Philosophy by holding the notion that, "Cause and effect is out of divine will", that's where Muslims decline in rational sciences, and religious dogmatism started in Islam.
thats your thought al ghazali also said no muslim can become a great muslim until he learned mathemathical sciences ..... yes he opposed some philosophers and their thoughts but not all ....but thats absurd to tag al ghazali as anti maths or anti science
This youtuber is narrow minded and that's why he refuted the great Scholar, the Proof of Islam (Hujjat ul Islam), Imam Gazali RA.
Imam Gazali told the truth. That although things happen according to the universal laws such as fire will always burn cotton, BUT these universal laws are themselves set by Allah and if Allah wants, he can change these laws for certain things such as changing the law of fire to save His Prophet Ibrahim AS, whereas the general law of fire remained the same all around the world. And that's why Imam Gazali said that fire will not burn cotton UNLESS Allah wants the fire to burn the cotton. It's such a simple concept but this book buddy didn't use basic critical thinking when he came to criticise the Great Scholar who saved the muslims at a time when Islam was just on the brink of failure. Allah set the universal and scientific laws, so everything will happen according to those laws, but if Allah wants, he can change these laws itself for some reason, so in essense, it's no doubt Allah HIMSELF who burns the cotton, not the fire, since fire is just obeying the law Allah set for it. Why can't this book buddy understand this simple concept especially when he has read thousands of books. I learnt that critical and logical thinking comes from intuition and reflection, not by reading thousands of books like the book buddy. And Al Gazali himself encouraged to learn and understand science and maths but he just told us to remain conscience of not letting this knowledge destroy our Aqeedah which says that nothing happens, not even a leaf falls without the permission of Allah (according to an Ayah of Quran).
Imam Al-Ghazali was much more than what we Muslims have brought him down to. His orthodoxy was extremely intellectual. He git involved with Sufism because he had become a skeptic. And treated the skeptic in him with sufism.
This youtuber is narrow minded and that's why he refuted the great Scholar, the Proof of Islam (Hujjat ul Islam), Imam Gazali RA.
Imam Gazali told the truth. That although things happen according to the universal laws such as fire will always burn cotton, BUT these universal laws are themselves set by Allah and if Allah wants, he can change these laws for certain things such as changing the law of fire to save His Prophet Ibrahim AS, whereas the general law of fire remained the same all around the world. And that's why Imam Gazali said that fire will not burn cotton UNLESS Allah wants the fire to burn the cotton. It's such a simple concept but this book buddy didn't use basic critical thinking when he came to criticise the Great Scholar who saved the muslims at a time when Islam was just on the brink of failure. Allah set the universal and scientific laws, so everything will happen according to those laws, but if Allah wants, he can change these laws itself for some reason, so in essense, it's no doubt Allah HIMSELF who burns the cotton, not the fire, since fire is just obeying the law Allah set for it. Why can't this book buddy understand this simple concept especially when he has read thousands of books. I learnt that critical and logical thinking comes from intuition and reflection, not by reading thousands of books like the book buddy. And Al Gazali himself encouraged to learn and understand science and maths but he just told us to remain conscience of not letting this knowledge destroy our Aqeedah which says that nothing happens, not even a leaf falls without the permission of Allah (according to an Ayah of Quran).
Enjoying your informative videos.
Stay Blessed.
Best Regards
We need more people like u in the Muslim wolrd
Clerics rationality se is liye darte the ke insan be adab ho jaata hai,ek kahawat hai,Ba adab ba naseeb bay adab badnaseeb.
I wish we could revive muatazila way of thinking today ❤
✴This video is a testimony of confirmation bias. Khawarizmi (unknown creed) and Ibn al Haythm were the top Muslim scientists. Ibn al Haythm's creed was Ashariah, which opposes Mutazillah. He emphasized not preferring reason over revelation, criticized Greek writings that they just spread ikhtalaf, and advocated for the scientific method. Same creed for Razi and ibn Khaladun. Also, Gazzali was against the metaphysical (branch of philosophy that deals with the nature of reality, existence, time, and god) approach of philosophers...However, he supported science and rationality. He belonged to the Ashariah school of Ilm Kalam, which promotes the use of reason alongside revelation. Al-Ghazali stated that the greatest crime against religion is opposing science, and he considered pursuing any science that can help the community to grow as Farze Kafayah. Drawing a parallel, the transgressed statement by the late Stephen Hawking," Philosophy is dead and we don't need it anymore " doesn't necessarily mean he was against rationality. The Scientific Revolution marked a shift from the medieval Aristotelian worldview to a more quantitative and mechanistic approach to understanding the natural world.
All these things don't matter today.
It is the result of suppressing rational thinking. Caliphs played a major role in suppressing these. Ottoman empire banned printing press stating it as invention of kuffar.
We can witness the state of Muslims today and their contribution to the scientific discoveries . How many noble prize winning scientists are Muslims? As compared to jews / Christians.
Loud speakers were considered haram, TV was considered haram, internet was considered haram. And everything became halal after few days? Only rational thinking can make Muslims to progress whether in filed of science and technology. geopolitics or any other aspect.
Read Allama ghulam ahmed pervez sb...you will find cent to cent logical interpretation of Quran .
The explanation book budy produced here of surah, its the replica of what pervez sb has written in his MAFHOOM UL QURAN
Yeah agree
Nah we don't want another minha
Incredible
علماء کے خلاف فضول اور بے بنیاد باتیں، پہلے زمانے میں تو دین اور دنیاوی علم میں کوئی فرق ہی نہیں سمجھا جاتا تھا، دونوں کو علماء کہا گیا
اگر کوئی شخص فلسفہ، دینیات، منطقی سوچ، سائنس، یا ہندسہ میں ماہر ہو، اور تمہارے نظریہ (پوشیدہ منصوبہ) کے مطابق، کیا تم مانتے ہو کہ ایک مسلمان کو بے شرمی سے ان کے تمام نظریات کو قبول کرنا چاہئے، جو کہ ملحد، ایگنوسٹک، اور بت پرستوں کی بھی ہو سکتی ہیں؟ آج کے دور میں ملحد، ایگنوسٹک، اور مختلف شعبوں میں ماہر افراد کی موجودگی کو دیکھتے ہوئے، کیا مسلمان کو ان تمام نقطہ نظرات کو قبول کرنا چاہئے، حتیٰ کہ یہ ان کے ایمان اور دین کو خطرہ متعین کرنے کا مطلب ہو؟
Muslim clergy = jahil insaan
Per tum jaise munafiq deobanghi baddeen badmazhab musalmano ne jitna is ummat ko tassawuf philosophy theology mantiq islamic science anstromy poet se door Kara itne kisi ne nhai Kara
Apse request krta hon please Pakistan ko mazeed andery me mat dakelen....
Aor sachayi ko accept kren .....
Very informative series,...keep on making more videos on this topic...
SUBHANALLAH ❤ i love your work
Good job ❤
No doubt beyond everything is science or scientific laws. But beyond every science or scientific laws there is Allah.
Then why did he not reveal those laws in his divine scriptures?
@@deepsareen1ye Banda akal ka dusman h. Isse bahas ka koi fayda nahi. Ye her chiz me alla ghusedega.
This youtuber is narrow minded and that's why he refuted the great Scholar, the Proof of Islam (Hujjat ul Islam), Imam Gazali RA.
Imam Gazali told the truth. That although things happen according to the universal laws such as fire will always burn cotton, BUT these universal laws are themselves set by Allah and if Allah wants, he can change these laws for certain things such as changing the law of fire to save His Prophet Ibrahim AS, whereas the general law of fire remained the same all around the world. And that's why Imam Gazali said that fire will not burn cotton UNLESS Allah wants the fire to burn the cotton. It's such a simple concept but this book buddy didn't use basic critical thinking when he came to criticise the Great Scholar who saved the muslims at a time when Islam was just on the brink of failure. Allah set the universal and scientific laws, so everything will happen according to those laws, but if Allah wants, he can change these laws itself for some reason, so in essense, it's no doubt Allah HIMSELF who burns the cotton, not the fire, since fire is just obeying the law Allah set for it. Why can't this book buddy understand this simple concept especially when he has read thousands of books. I learnt that critical and logical thinking comes from intuition and reflection, not by reading thousands of books like the book buddy. And Al Gazali himself encouraged to learn and understand science and maths but he just told us to remain conscience of not letting this knowledge destroy our Aqeedah which says that nothing happens, not even a leaf falls without the permission of Allah (according to an Ayah of Quran).
Allah has given man Intellectual Power,Science means any form of knowledge,Technology Biology Chemistry and Physics are only a source to understand the natural phenomenas but there is other side of knowledge and science which are Social science political science Psychology etc, these are just sources yo understand some phenomenas in man's life, our hypothese may be true or wrong , buy to understand the truth of Life we have only one form of knowledge which is Divine , given by Allah through Prophets, the last testament Qur'an and Ahlul Beyt Alaihissalam ❤
Great video, very informative.
We should think rationally about the Quran and the ahkamat of Nabi SAW.
He did not know Al Ghazi that’s why He is blaming him.
This youtuber is narrow minded and that's why he refuted the great Scholar, the Proof of Islam (Hujjat ul Islam), Imam Gazali RA.
Imam Gazali told the truth. That although things happen according to the universal laws such as fire will always burn cotton, BUT these universal laws are themselves set by Allah and if Allah wants, he can change these laws for certain things such as changing the law of fire to save His Prophet Ibrahim AS, whereas the general law of fire remained the same all around the world. And that's why Imam Gazali said that fire will not burn cotton UNLESS Allah wants the fire to burn the cotton. It's such a simple concept but this book buddy didn't use basic critical thinking when he came to criticise the Great Scholar who saved the muslims at a time when Islam was just on the brink of failure. Allah set the universal and scientific laws, so everything will happen according to those laws, but if Allah wants, he can change these laws itself for some reason, so in essense, it's no doubt Allah HIMSELF who burns the cotton, not the fire, since fire is just obeying the law Allah set for it. Why can't this book buddy understand this simple concept especially when he has read thousands of books. I learnt that critical and logical thinking comes from intuition and reflection, not by reading thousands of books like the book buddy. And Al Gazali himself encouraged to learn and understand science and maths but he just told us to remain conscience of not letting this knowledge destroy our Aqeedah which says that nothing happens, not even a leaf falls without the permission of Allah (according to an Ayah of Quran).
Superb!
All Islamic sects fell in this trap.Now The Islamic Republic Of Iran has laid a strong foundation for rationality that is why it is developing in each and every sphere by leaps and bounds.
Ur thoughts in this refard plz.
Her baat ky peechay science aur science ya her shay key peechay divine power Allah eshwar god .. yeh alfaaz b kiss NY bajayeh ussi divine power ny jiss ny sub Kuch banaya.. haq hy science coz such Ka Allah hy ... Good effort bro keep it up
This youtuber is narrow minded and that's why he refuted the great Scholar, the Proof of Islam (Hujjat ul Islam), Imam Gazali RA.
Imam Gazali told the truth. That although things happen according to the universal laws such as fire will always burn cotton, BUT these universal laws are themselves set by Allah and if Allah wants, he can change these laws for certain things such as changing the law of fire to save His Prophet Ibrahim AS, whereas the general law of fire remained the same all around the world. And that's why Imam Gazali said that fire will not burn cotton UNLESS Allah wants the fire to burn the cotton. It's such a simple concept but this book buddy didn't use basic critical thinking when he came to criticise the Great Scholar who saved the muslims at a time when Islam was just on the brink of failure. Allah set the universal and scientific laws, so everything will happen according to those laws, but if Allah wants, he can change these laws itself for some reason, so in essense, it's no doubt Allah HIMSELF who burns the cotton, not the fire, since fire is just obeying the law Allah set for it. Why can't this book buddy understand this simple concept especially when he has read thousands of books. I learnt that critical and logical thinking comes from intuition and reflection, not by reading thousands of books like the book buddy. And Al Gazali himself encouraged to learn and understand science and maths but he just told us to remain conscience of not letting this knowledge destroy our Aqeedah which says that nothing happens, not even a leaf falls without the permission of Allah (according to an Ayah of Quran).
Gazali was not wrong but actually gazali was explaing things beyond all philosophers but both parties were true by thier own thoughts and levels
i was wating this video
Have not heard about Christian philosophers hindu philosophers, Jews philosophers but first time hearing about Muslim philosophers.
Matlab?
Wonderful ❤❤❤
A vedio of just 15/16 minutes isn't enough plz make it some lengthy... I love it
How awful what we (Muslims) have done with ourselves.
Thank you @bookbuddy for sharing your knowledge and insight with us.
Masha Allah I have fan your intellegency great dr sahab.
جب بعد میں آنے والے لوگ امت کے گذرے ہوئے نیک لوگوں کو برا کہنے لگے تو پھر سرخ آندھیوں کا انتظار کرو ۔ قیامت کی نشانیوں میں سے ایک بڑی نشانی ۔
You are doing a wonderful job
Outstanding
وللہ آپ جہاد کر رہے ہیں اللہ آپ کی اس کاوش کو مولوی سے بچائے اور محفوظ رکھے ھمیں عقل اور سچائی عطاء فرمائے آمین
Ameen
Bohat Shukriya!
References kahan hain?
References bhi add karen
Kyu k aap koi book ki summary nhi bata rahe
مسلمان سائنس دانوں پر ظلم کے غیر ثابت واقعات! part 1
==========================
سوشل میڈیا پر کافی عرصہ سے ایک پوسٹ گردش کر رہی ہے جس کے مطابق مسلمان سائنسدانوں کے ساتھ مسلمانوں نے بہت عبرتناک رویہ رکھا۔۔۔ہو سکتا ہے ان باتوں میں کچھ کسی حد تک درست بھی ہوں مگر زیادہ تر غیر ثابت شدہ ہیں ۔۔۔۔اِس تحریر میں اُن سائنسدانوں کے حالات و واقعات مستند حوالہ جات کے ذریعے بیان کیے گئے ہیں !
۱) یعقوب بن اسحاق الکندی:
ان تحریر لکھنے والوں کے مطابق یعقوب بن اسحاق الکندی پر "مُلّا" کی وجہ سے تشدد کیا گیا، ان کا کتب خانہ ضبط گیا۔ اس کو سرِ عام کوڑے مارے گئے اور اس کو جب کوڑے مارے جاتے تھے، تو لوگ ہنستے تھے۔ الکندی معتزلہ کے دور میں پیدا ہوئے تھے جب مامون الرشید اور معتصم باللہ جیسے عباسی خلفاء کے دور میں پیدا ہوا تھا۔ معتصم اور مامون معتزلی اور یونانی فلسفہ کے حامی تھے۔ معتصم ہی نے تو امام احمدؓ پر خوب ظلم کیا تھا کیونکہ وہ معتزلہ کے عقائد کو مسترد کرتے تھے۔
مامون الرشید میں بھی اعتزال تھا۔ حوالے کے طور پر علّامہ شبلی نعمانیؒ کی کتاب "المامون" دیکھ لیجیئے۔ [المامون، صفحہ نمبر ۱۶۱-۱۶۲] یہ لوگ کسی کو فلسفہ کی بنیاد پر کیونکر سزا دے سکتے ہیں؟ اور یعقوب کی سیرت پر ابن صاعد الاندلسیؒ نے اپنی کتاب "طبقات الأمم" میں ذکر کیا ہے مگر اس میں ایسی کسی بات کا ذکر نہیں کہ اس کو مارا گیا یا کوڑے لگائے گئے ہوں۔ [طبقات الأمم لابن صاعد الأندلسي، صفحہ نمبر ۵۱] اس کے علاوہ دیگر مؤرخین نے بھی ان کا ذکر اپنی کتابوں میں کیا ہے مگر ایسی کسی بات کا ذکر نہیں کیا۔
البتہ بڑی مشکل سے ایک روایت ملی ہے جس کے مطابق عباسی خلیفہ "متوکل" نے یعقوب الکندی کو مارا تھا۔ [الوافي بالوفيات، جلد ۱۵، صفحہ نمبر ۲۹۴] مگر اس میں بھی لوگوں کے ہنسنے کا کہیں ذکر نہیں، اور وہ دیگر تفصیلات جو بیان کی گئی ہیں، وہ اس میں موجود نہیں ہے۔ اور یہ روایت غیر مستند بھی ہے۔ اس کا راوی ابو کامل الحاسب مجہول ہے۔ [لسان الميزان، جلد ۳، صفحہ نمبر ۱۶۳] ایسی روایت سے کچھ ثابت نہیں ہوتا۔ اور ہنسنے اور لوگوں کے قہقہ لگانے کے حوالے سے بقیہ باتیں بھی اپنے مبالغے سے انہوں نے شامل کی ہیں، ان کا تو اس روایت میں بھی کہیں ذکر نہیں۔
۲) علّامہ ابو الولید ابنِ رشد رحمہ اللہ:
ایک دعویٰ یہ بھی کیا گیا کہ جنابِ ابنِ رشد کو "بے دین" قرار دیا گیا اور پھر ان کی کتابوں کو جلادیا گیا۔ پھر جامع مسجد کے ستون پر باندھ کر ابنِ رشد کے منہ پر لوگوں نے تھوکنا شروع کردیا۔ اس "ٰعظیم" عالم نے زندگی آخری دن ذلّت اور گُمنامی میں گذار دی۔ مولویوں نے کیا واقعی علّامہ ابنِ رشدؒ کے حوالے سے کبھی ایسا کچھ کہا؟ علّامہ ابن ابی صبیعہ رحمہ اللہ ان کے متعلق فرماتے ہیں:
كان أوحد في الفقه والخلاف، وبرع في الطب
ترجمہ: وہ فقہ و خلاف میں یکتا (اپنی شان) رکھتے تھے، اور علومِ طب کے ماہر تھے۔
[يون الأنباء في طبقات الأطباء، جلد ۳، صفحہ نمبر ۳۱۹]
علّامہ ذہبیؒ ان کے متعلق مدح کرتے ہوئے فرماتے ہیں:
وكان يُفزع إلى فتياه في الطب، كما يُفزع إلى فتياه في الفقه، مع وفور العربية، وقيل: كان يحفظ ديوان أبي تمام والمتنبي.
[سير أعلام النبلاء، جلد ۲۱، صفحہ نمبر ۳۱۸]
یعنی علومِ طب اور علومِ فقہ میں ان جیسا کوئی نہ تھا اور انہوں نے ابو تمام اور منتبی کے دیوان بھی حفظ کیے ہوئے تھے۔
فقہ مالکی کی کتاب "بداية المجتهد ونهاية المقتصد" ایک زبردست فقہ کی کتاب ہے جو علّامہ ابنِ رشد نے لکھی تھی۔ امام مالکؒ کی کتاب موطا امام مالکؒ کو آپؒ نے حفظ کیا تھا۔ مشہور محدث و حافظ محمد بن رزق رحمہ اللہ کے آپ شاگرد تھے۔ اس کے علاوہ علومِ دین پر مناهج الأدلة في عقائد الملة میں اسلام کے عقائد کو آپ نے ثابت کرنے کے لیے تویل فلسفیانہ ابواب باندھے ہیں۔ ان کی کتاب "بداية" کو فقہ میں اچھی خاصی شہرت حاصل ہے اور اس کی شروحات تک سعودیہ عرب وغیرہ سے شائع ہوچکی ہیں۔ اور علماء نے بڑی عزت سے ان کا تذکرہ کیا ہے۔
مگر ان مولویوں نے اس تحریر کے مطابق ابنِ رشد کو "دین بیزار" کہا ہے جس کا کوئی ثبوت نہیں ہے۔ اور قاضی ابنِ رشدؒ اشبیلہ کے قاضی بھی رہ چکے تھے۔ ان کو حکومت نے ہی اس منصب پر فائز کیا تھا۔ [ابن رشد والرشدية، صفحہ نمبر ۴۴۶] ارنست ریحان نے اپنی کتاب "ابن رشد والرشدية" کے قطعات میں تمام سابقہ سیرتوں سے ابنِ رشد کا ذکر نقل کیا ہے، مگر میں نے کہیں بھی یہ جامع مسجد میں تھوکنے والی بات نہیں پڑھی ہے۔ یہ تو خدا ہی جانتا ہے کہ کونسی روایت میں ہے۔
ہاں، ابنِ رشد کی سزا کا ذکر ملتا ہے۔ مگر کیا کسی مُلّا کی وجہ سے سزا ہوئی تھی؟ ہرگز بھی نہیں! طبیب ابن ابی صبیعہ کے مطابق وجہ یہ تھی کہ ابنِ رشد نے اپنی کتاب الحیوان میں خلیفہ منصور کو "الملك البربر" کہہ دیا تھا جس کے معنی اچھے نہیں بنتے۔ غلطی سے تصحیف ہوگئی اور "الملك البرين" کی جگہ بادشاہ کو "بربر" کہہ دیا گیا جس پر بادشاہ کو غصّہ آیا اور اس نے سزا دی۔ [ابن رشد والرشدية، صفحہ نمبر ۴۴۸]
اس میں کسی مولوی کا کیا قصور تھا یا کیا قصور ہے؟ یہ کام انگلستان میں اگر کوئی سائنس دان کرتا، تو ایک دو صدی پہلے اس کا بھی یہی حشر ہوتا بلکہ اس سے شاید اس سے بھی بُری حالت ہوتی۔ یہی کام پچھلی صدی جرمنی میں کوئی کرتا تو شاید مار دیا جاتا، ابنِ رشد تو زندہ رکھا گیا اور صرف اپنے گھر میں نظر بند کیا گیا تھا۔ اگرچہ ان کے ثبوت بھی قطعی الثبوت نہیں ہیں، مشکوک ہوسکتے ہیں مگر ایسی باتیں کہیں بھی نہیں جو مشہور کی جارہی ہیں۔
اور میرا ایک سوال ہے، اگر واقعی ساری کتابیں جلادی تھیں، تو آج دنیا بھر میں ابنِ رشد کی ہر موضوع پر کوئی نہ کوئی کتاب کیسے موجود ہے؟ کونسی کتاب جلائی گئی؟ ہمیں بھی بتائیں۔ کیسا بیوقوفانہ اعتراض ہے؟ اس طرح تو کوئی کتاب ہی آپ تک نہیں پہنچنی چاہیئے تھی۔
و میرے علم میں اس کا کوئی ثبوت نہیں ہے۔
wonderfully explained, most of the people dont hv the idea how much these religious orthodox mullahs hv destroyed the true spirit of deen islam with their irrational dogmatic believes and ppl like ghazali should be put to justice
Have you read alghazali?
@@mfaseeh.skh7 ✴This video is a testimony of confirmation bias. Khawarizmi (unknown creed) and Ibn al Haythm were the top Muslim scientists. Ibn al Haythm's creed was Ashariah, which opposes Mutazillah. He emphasized not preferring reason over revelation, criticized Greek writings that they just spread ikhtalaf, and advocated for the scientific method. same for Razi and ibn Khaladun. Also, Gazzali was against the metaphysical (branch of philosophy that deals with the nature of reality, existence, time, and god) approach of philosophers...However, he supported science and rationality. He belonged to the Ashariah school of Ilm Kalam, which promotes the use of reason alongside revelation. Al-Ghazali stated that the greatest crime against religion is opposing science, and he considered pursuing any science that can help the community to grow as Farze Kafayah. Drawing a parallel, the transgressed statement by the late Stephen Hawking," Philosophy is dead and we don't need it anymore " doesn't necessarily mean he was against rationality. The Scientific Revolution marked a shift from the medieval Aristotelian worldview to a more quantitative and mechanistic approach to understanding the natural world.
My dear and respected brother ASRB, l am Saluate you, documentary present, keep it up, l am from Bangalore, lndia
Regards
alkindi ko kory marny ka waqiya kis kitab mai hay.please point out the book name
Love you bro from Balochistan ❤
Sir your explanation is full And final.
Murshad Sharukh
Agree👍... Nice work... Keep it up
Very nice video!
Imam ghazzali tassawuf ka bade scholars mai se ek the aur india ka sabse bade philosopher imam rumi,imam Rabbani aur imam baba bulle shah the jinse Allama Iqbal jaise bade philosopher muthasir huye the
Ye sab he le dobe Han hame. 😂
In sab ka kya fayda ???
Sufism aur wahabbism yeah do main reason hai muslims kai decline ka .
In dono sects nai muslims ki rational thinking ko khatm karne mai koi kasar nahi chodi
@@mubarakahmed1456lol shayad app tareeq ka ilim se mohtaj hai jabhi aap be aqal baat keh rahe hai hazrat 😂
I have some questions to ask kindly respond..
What is the relevance of iqbal's philosophy or iqbal's epistemology in the present world
Another question iqbal's epistemology was similar with which westren empiricist philosopher ?
Another question what is the connection between epistemology and metaphysics?
Why we call iqbal as spiritual monist??
Please do reply whosoever know the correct answer
Well done ❤
Moderate and modern Muslims/Christians/Hindus legitimizes myths and irrationality and forms the foundation of extremism 15:12
وڈیو بہت پسند آئی
Appreciative job ❤
Great video ❤plz recommend some books about this topic
Part 2
۳) طبیب ابنِ سینا:
عرض ہے کہ طبیب ابنِ سینا اپنے زمانے کے امیر ترین اور انتہائی خوش حالاتِ زندگی میں رہنے والا شخص تھا۔ اس شخص کے غلام تھے اور اس کو اچھی خاصی شہرت حاصل تھی۔ موت سے قبل ایک بڑے پیمانے پر انہوں نے غلام بھی آزاد کیے اور صدقے بھی دیئے جب ان کو پتا چلا کہ موت کا وقت قریب ہے۔ [وفيات الأعيان وأنباء أبناء الزمان، جلد ۲، صفحہ نمبر ۱۶۰]
اب منظر کشی یہ کی جارہی ہے کہ ساری زندگی بیچارے ابنِ سینا کے پیچھے حکمران پڑے رہے اور اس پر ظلم و ستم کرنے کی ہر ممکنہ کوشش اپنا حذف بناچکے تھے۔ میں نے کوشش کی مگر ایسے کسی مستقل ظلم و ستم کے حوالے سے مجھے کچھ بھی نہ ملا۔ ان کا دور بھی عباسی خلفا کا دور تھا اور میرا نہیں خیال کہ ابنِ سینا کے خلاف ایسی کوئی کاروائی کی گئی جس کا دعویٰ کیا گیا۔
۴) طبیب ابو بکر الرازیؒ:
ابو بکر الرازیؒ کے بارے میں بعض اسماعیلی شیعوں نے یہ بات ضرور کی تھی کہ یہ ملحد اور زندیق نیز نبوت کا منکر ہے، مگر امام رازیؒ نے اس طرح کی باتوں کی خود تردید فرمائی تھی۔ [الطبّ الروحاني، فصل نمبر: ۵، صفحہ نمبر ۵۴] اپنے ایمان اور یقین کا اظہار کئی مقامات پر کیا ہے اور الحاد مخالف باتیں بھی کہی ہیں۔ [الطبّ الروحاني، فضل نمبر: ۲۰، صفحہ نمبر ۷۰ وغیرہ]
امام ذہبیؒ نے "سیر اعلام النبلاء" میں ان کا ذکر کیا ہے مگر ایسے کسی حکمران کے مارنے کے واقعہ کا ذکر نہیں فرمایا ہے۔ [سير أعلام النبلاء، جزو: ۱۴، صفحہ نمبر ۳۵۴] جو یہ دعویٰ کیا گیا ہے کہ حکمران نے زکریا الرازیؒ کو مارا، تو میرے علم میں اس کا کوئی ثبوت نہیں ہے۔
بشکریہ : سید عکاشہ
ایسی جھوٹی کہانیاں دین بیزار طبقے کی جانب سے پھیلائی جاتی ہیں جو رائی کا پہاڑ بنانے اور پروپیگنڈہ کرنے میں اپنا ثانی نہیں رکھتے.......
ایسا ہی کچھ معاملہ پروفیسر شیر علی صاحب کا بھی ہے جس کو خوب بڑھا چڑھا کر پروپیگنڈہ کیا جا رہا ہے کہ جیسے مسیحیت نے سائنسدانوں کو اپنے نظریات سے توبہ کروانے پر ریاستی دباؤ ڈالا آج علماء کرام بھی وہی رویہ اختیار کرکے سائنس دشمنی کا مظاہرہ کر رہے ہیں کسی نے کہا پروفیسر صاحب کو ارتقاء پڑھانے کی سزا دی جا رہی ہے، کسی نے کہا بیالوجی پڑھانے کی سزا دی گئی، کسی نے یہ مطالبہ بھی کر لیا کہ سیدھا سیدھا پاکستان میں سائنس پڑھانے پر پابندی لگوا دیجئے تاکہ بات ہی ختم ہو وغیرہ وغیرہ....یہ ساری باتیں نئی نسل کو جذبانی طور پر گمراہ کرنے کی خاطر کی جا رہی ہیں ان میں ایک فیصد بھی صداقت نہیں....
پروفیسر شیر علی اور سینکڑوں اساتذہ برسوں سے پاکستان میں تمام سائنسی سبجیکٹس اور نظریات بھی پڑھاتے چلے آ رہے ہیں بیالوجی بھی اور ارتقاء کا نظریہ بھی۔۔۔ آج تک نہ عام مسلمانوں کو کوئی شکایت ہوئی اور نہ ہی علماء کرام نے اس کے خلاف احتجاج کیا...........
جب بات سائنس سے آگے بڑھ کر سکول و کالج کا کوئی استاد شرعی پردے پر تنقید، آزادانہ سیکس کا مطالبہ اور شعائر اللہ کی توہین کرنے پر اتر آتا ہے تو مسلمانوں کا عموما اور علماء کرام کا خصوصا فریضہ ہے کہ ایسے لوگوں کو اپنے دائرے سے نہ نکلنے دیں ......
پروفیسر شیر علی نے کچھ ایسے ہی اقدامات شروع کر دیئے تھے وہ اپنی اسٹیٹس اور ذاتی وجاہت کو الحادی اور لبرل افکار کے لیے استعمال کرنے لگے جو عام مسلمانوں کے لیے لمحہ فکریہ تھا اس بار انہوں نے پھر سے شرعی پردے اور کھلم کھلا سیکس(s*x) پر عوامی پلیٹ فارم یعنی ایک کانفرنس میں بات چیت کی جس پر علماء کرام نے احتجاج کیا کہ یہ سلسلہ رک جانا چاہیے جو فکری لحاظ سے عوام کے لیے گمراہ کن ہے اور خود اس شخص کے لیے بھی نقصان دہ ہے نیز اس سے امن عام بھی خراب ہوگا........اگر نظریہ ارتقاء کو سائنس اور کلاس روم تک ہی محدود رکھا جائے تو کسی کو کوئی مسئلہ نہیں ہے لیکن جب ایک شخص جس سے ہم سائنس سیکھنے کی توقع کر رہے ہیں وہ سائنس کو مذہب بیزاری کے لیے بطور tool استعمال کرنا شروع کر دے تو ایسے رویوں کی ضرور حوصلہ شکنی کی جانی چاہیے کیونکہ ایسے ہی لوگوں کی وجہ سے لوگ سائنس کو اپنا دشمن سمجھنے لگتے ہیں.........!
Great work bro. Keep it on please.
Pls is topic per book likkhe pls
Logical presentation.keep it up.
This youtuber is narrow minded and that's why he refuted the great Scholar, the Proof of Islam (Hujjat ul Islam), Imam Gazali RA.
Imam Gazali told the truth. That although things happen according to the universal laws such as fire will always burn cotton, BUT these universal laws are themselves set by Allah and if Allah wants, he can change these laws for certain things such as changing the law of fire to save His Prophet Ibrahim AS, whereas the general law of fire remained the same all around the world. And that's why Imam Gazali said that fire will not burn cotton UNLESS Allah wants the fire to burn the cotton. It's such a simple concept but this book buddy didn't use basic critical thinking when he came to criticise the Great Scholar who saved the muslims at a time when Islam was just on the brink of failure. Allah set the universal and scientific laws, so everything will happen according to those laws, but if Allah wants, he can change these laws itself for some reason, so in essense, it's no doubt Allah HIMSELF who burns the cotton, not the fire, since fire is just obeying the law Allah set for it. Why can't this book buddy understand this simple concept especially when he has read thousands of books. I learnt that critical and logical thinking comes from intuition and reflection, not by reading thousands of books like the book buddy. And Al Gazali himself encouraged to learn and understand science and maths but he just told us to remain conscience of not letting this knowledge destroy our Aqeedah which says that nothing happens, not even a leaf falls without the permission of Allah (according to an Ayah of Quran).
I will take both Point of view we have to follow Islamic orders without logic but we have to research and debate with non believers through logic
Agar aag science se lagti toh
Hazrat Ibrahim a.s b jal chukay hote (nauzbillah) Lekin sab Allah pak ka hukam hai tha or rhyga
Make a video shaikh akbar mohammad ibnul arbi.......
I find it super stupid that people start finding science and logical things by unnecessarily interpreting quotes in religious books.
ilm e nujoom par ek video banaye . iam from . Bombay,👍🏻
o captain my captain ! we appriciate U as U R assest for humanity
Is there any book available with these philosophers
When there was no science everything was running the same way!
What would you say about it ?
Excellent video.
❤
Need all your support 😮😮😮❤
Informative
قرآن میں صاف صاف لکھا ھے کہ جو قانون اللّٰہ نے بنا دیئے ہیں وہ خود بھی اِن قوانین کی مخالفت نہیں کرتا روئی میں آگ لگنا ایک قانونی طریقہ ھے اِن قوانین کو نيچر کہتے ہیں کائنات میں چاند سورج ستارے سیارے سب کے سب ایک میزان پر قائم ہیں اور کوئی اِس میزان سے ادھر اُدھر نہیں ہو سکتا کیا تُم آسمانوں میں غور نہیں کرتے ؟؟؟ 1400 سال پہلے غور کرنے کا قرآن بول رہا ھے تو آج ہم کیوں غور نہیں کرتے
Solely blaming Imam Ghazali for the decline of rational thought in Islam is not accurate. I have read the original work of Imam Ghazali that gave victory to the Asharities over Mutazilites, "Tahafat ul Filasifah" (The Incoherence of Philosophers). Ghazali simply discuss the superiority of revelation and that a Muslim should resort to revelation first than philosophy or logic (that's the best one liner summary I can put here). Ghazali never discouraged from sciences in general in his book. It's that he just gave the answers to the old Greek Philosophy question about God and Metaphysics, which were lingering up to his time and Mutazilites rejected God and Revelation for the sake of finding a rational answer to that question. I am not going to give Mutazilites a free pass as well. When they had the ears of the Caliph, they encouraged Caliph to persecute and get rid of the Asharities as they are irrational people. Imam Ahmad Ibn Hambel's death is a prominent case to look upon.
For the death of rationality in Muslims, we need to consider other factors as well. Imam Ghazali's work was later used as a tool to suppress the rational thought in Islam. Asharities began an exodus against the rational thinkers using the "Tahafut ul Filasifa" and got cozy with the Caliph and later the Sultans. The political dynamics were changing as well. Abbasid Caliphate was a declining power and newly convert Seljuks were rapidly advancing to the west from the Central Asian steppes. When Abbasids became a vassal to the Seljuks, the new rulers wanted to hold control over the Sunni Muslims. The final stone was casted by the Mongols with the destruction of the Baghdad in 1258 C.E. Ilkhanate, initially a Christian and Buddhist ruler state, later converted to Islam and continued the Seljuk policy of controlling. The Sufism and Orthodoxy was promoted instead of Rationality because rationality is a natural threat to the absolute control. The Region later came under the control of Ottomans and rest is history.
Before someone come here and refute me, I wanted to add that think about how many great discoveries and inventions have been made after 14th Century C.E in the Islamic World? Muslims became less interested in the free inquiry of the Universe and Theology took hold of all the mainstream education system. Sciences were taught but in a limited scope only relevant to the Islam and that too was old discoveries of the rational thinkers.
Science has discovered thousands tof factual things about that are either not reported or wrongly reported in religious books (Shape, size and movement of Sun, Earth and planets) Natural phenomenon, Diseases and cures .....). The trouble is that scriptures are supposed to be divine, eternal and therefore unchangeable, any inconsistency tends to be resolved by pos-hoc ratioalization and insipid arguments that do more damage to Religion than any benefit.
Best way out has been reformation and enlightenment of Religion and time is ripe for Islam to undergo that !
This youtuber is narrow minded and that's why he refuted the great Scholar, the Proof of Islam (Hujjat ul Islam), Imam Gazali RA.
Imam Gazali told the truth. That although things happen according to the universal laws such as fire will always burn cotton, BUT these universal laws are themselves set by Allah and if Allah wants, he can change these laws for certain things such as changing the law of fire to save His Prophet Ibrahim AS, whereas the general law of fire remained the same all around the world. And that's why Imam Gazali said that fire will not burn cotton UNLESS Allah wants the fire to burn the cotton. It's such a simple concept but this book buddy didn't use basic critical thinking when he came to criticise the Great Scholar who saved the muslims at a time when Islam was just on the brink of failure. Allah set the universal and scientific laws, so everything will happen according to those laws, but if Allah wants, he can change these laws itself for some reason, so in essense, it's no doubt Allah HIMSELF who burns the cotton, not the fire, since fire is just obeying the law Allah set for it. Why can't this book buddy understand this simple concept especially when he has read thousands of books. I learnt that critical and logical thinking comes from intuition and reflection, not by reading thousands of books like the book buddy. And Al Gazali himself encouraged to learn and understand science and maths but he just told us to remain conscience of not letting this knowledge destroy our Aqeedah which says that nothing happens, not even a leaf falls without the permission of Allah (according to an Ayah of Quran).
I think your concept is not clear about even science. And still you are accusing Molana Hazraat for all of your own misconceptions. Although you're right that everything in the universe happened because of any rule and as a Muslim we must do research on different branches of knowledge (Science) such as Physics, Maths, Biology and Chemistry etc but there are two things you must KNOW and think about it.
1 Allah (S.W.T.) is the supreme authority who made the universal rules and according to those rules everything happens in the universe.
2 True belief is that Allah (S. W.T.) is above the LAW of nature, HE is not bound to "cause and affects", HE can change every rule of the universe if he wants to.
There are more than hundred thousands examples of past we have studied and more than enough are exist in the present time in which we can easily see breaking the LAWS of nature "cause and affects".
So my only point is if you are MUSLIM kindly spread knowledge about Muslim Scientists and scholars, Motivate your viewers to do research and study science, awake them to do better in their lives but don't tont MUSLIM scholars, don't make fun of ISLAMIC values and chanting (ZIKR), don't lead your innocent viewers towards "KUFR"..
Aaj ke mojood era me jaise sahil adeem ke peeche orthodox scholers peeche pade hai us wakt ki condition bhi samjh me aa rahi hai
Amazing sir
These Islamic concepts were for common person not for scholars; philosophy and real Islam is not same; but for common person who want to follow someone that is OK; not all thoughts or researcher/Scholars are OK; everyone has correct and wrong thoughts.
One of good vedio ever 🎉🎉
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
جناب پہلی بات میں نے امام صاحب کو باریکی سے پڑھ نہیں لیکن اگر امام صاحب یہ بات کی ہے کہ ہر کام اللہ کی اجازت ہوتا ہے تو یہ بات بالکل سچ ہے۔ یہ کائنات اس نے بنائی ہے یہ لحمہ بہت بڑا وہ اس سے بھی چھوٹی جو اکائی ہے وہ اس میں بھی دیکھ رہا ہے۔ اب ہم آتے ہے ایجادات کی طرف۔ کہ مسلمان بقول اپ کے کہ وہ صرف سبحان اللہ ماشاءاللہ الحمدللہ پر خوش ہے۔ ایک سوال ہے اگر اس جہان کو سارا کا سارا انسان کو دے دیا جائے اور اللہ کی معرفت اس سے بے خبر ہو ۔ ہم کو یہ تو پتہ چلا جائے کہ ہم نے گاڑی کیسے بنانی ہے ہوائی جہاز کیسے بناتے ہیں موبائل کیسے کام کرتا ہے ان سب کا حاصل کیا ہے جب ہم پیش کیے جائے تو خالی ہاتھ ہو۔ ایک اور سوال کیا کوئی بھی انسان انبیاء کرام سے زیادہ اعلی دماغ کے مالک تھے کہ جن کو براے راست اللہ تک رسائی حاصل تھی انہوں نے ایسی کوئی ایجاد کیونکر پیش نہ کی۔۔۔۔۔؟؟؟؟؟؟