Truly an excellent documentary. The in depth coverage of these three islamic gunpowder empires was truly spot on. Its is somewhat difficult to find documentaries on the Safavids on the Internet as the material left behind is more scarce compared to the ottomans and mughals, so it was refreshing to see a documentary that covers all 3 in good detail. Well done!
@@Andres-v7r2h The Ottoman sultan was a puppet by that time that was carried out by turkish nationalists in the army and head of operation was enver pasha "Ottoman empire did genocide!!! 😭😭😭"
This video was a fascinating overview of the three gunpowder empires of the early modern world: the Ottoman Empire, Safavid Iran, and Mughal India. I was particularly interested in learning about the Ottoman Empire's use of the Janissary corps, a professional standing army that played a key role in the empire's expansion. I also found the discussion of the Safavid Empire's religious policies and the Mughal Empire's cultural achievements to be very informative.
@@MadeInHistory “The American missionary Eli Smith and G. H. O. Dwight, who traveled through turkey at the beginning of the nineteenth century observed that the turkomans were generally called Turks by the Ottomans, who abhorred the name Turk and proffered to be called Musalmans (Muslims). To the Ottomans, “turk” was a name that belonged to the people of Turkestan and the nomadic hordes who roamed the steppes of khurrusan. They considered themselves civilized Ottomans, and could not understand why Europeans called them Turks. As a sophisticated ruling class, the Ottomans looked down upon the Turkish peasantry, calling them esek Turk (Donkey Turk), and kaba turk (stupid turk). Expressions like “turk-head” and “turk-person” were contemptuously used by ottomans when they wanted to denigrate each other.”
Spent appx. 5 wk. in Turkiye, '90. Studied a bit before, learned more since. Seen more ovvit than many ovvits citizens ! Beautiful, generous people at core. Fascinating history. Memories I treasure.
@@dominicj7977 No, he was real. We have minted coins which mention "Osman, son of Ertuğrul". But the only thing we know for certain about him is that he existed. That's it. The current famous Turkish drama is filled with artistic imagination.
It's a shame that Muslims have seemingly peaked (militarily, technologically, economically and culturally) in the 17th century. The only way to recover now is to join the Space Race and carve out colonies on other planets, or else we'll stay behind. Insha'Allāh, we will do it. Hopefully more Muslim states take inspiration from the UAE's Mars 2117 vision.
Mughal for economy? What was their economic policy? What were their innovations? Did they promote education, innovation and entrepreneurship? India was the largest economy purely because of its size of the geography & population, and Europe was only starting to industrialize at that time. Mughals, if anything, were a disaster for the Indian economy.
What’s interesting is that all three empires had Persian culture, The Turks migrated to this region about 1k years ago and basically adopted the Persian culture.
I'm like, 90% sure there was a 3D model of Suleimon from Civ 5 or 6...nice! Also, more great history, thanks! I think I'm a bit more educated on the Ottomans, so their story is most interesting to me since I can tie Ottoman history with broader European history... :)
I think this video skipped a pretty significant event in Ottoman history. Mehmed II's reign wasn't as seamless as him fighting Hunyadi and then conquering Constantinople. He had 2 reigns, the first where he was only a child and Hunyadi and the Christians went to fight him, causing him to give the throne back to his father. And then, when his father died, he reclaimed the throne at an older age (only 19 though, but still) and went to conquer Constantiople. Also, a more in depth overview of the Sultanate of Women and the various overthrows in the early 17th century would help with the context of Ottoman stagnation.
Shah Ismael poem : Yetdükce tükenür Arab’un kûy u meskeni, Bağdad içinde her nece kim Türkman kopar Sen ey Türk-i peri peyker, ecaib sün-i Yezdan’san Görenden berü ruh-sarun, sözüm, Allahu ekber’dir. Ey Hatâî! Şol Huten Türki saçınun şemmesi, Nafe-yi sehraya saldı belki misk ü enberi!.
Golden Point - Mughal Architecture or Indian Muslim Architecture is quite different from any of the other Muslim Architectures ie Ottomans, Persians, Arabs etc
Why do turks keep repeating this nonsense? Safavid Iranian 🇮🇷 Empire was founded by Kurdish/Iranian roots. They had many turkomen tribe soldiers. Safavid empire ki_lled alot of invading turks ottoman and uzbek. Mongols also had alot of turk soldiers those that ra_ped and murd_ered.
@@mirvan5478 the founder of the Dynasty is from Erdebil, southern Azerbaycan. Kurds have nothing to do there. Stop spreading false info. Shah İsmail was writing his poems in Turkish. His army was mostly Turkmen light cavalry. Thats why he lost against ottomans bc ottomans were using canons.
Good documentary, but it's missing the wars between Ottomans and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The battle of Chocim in 1621: the army of the Commonwealth with Zaporoshian Cossacks defended the massive siege of the Ottoman army led by Sultan Osman II himself.
Some people's racsim (I included in this is being disrespectful etc towards other faiths be it Christianity, Islam or whatever), nationalism and patriotism is disgusting. We should learn history to understand the past; learn lessons for the future and to better understand the present plus we can take pride in anything good our people did/accomplished in the past. But we should not let the past make us so full of pride or anger towards otherd that we become racist (I included in this is being disrespectful etc towards other faiths be it Christianity, Islam or whatever) and/or nationalist and/or patriotic in a bad way. Every nation and faith has a past full of glory, golden times and excellent achievements. However every nation and faith has times in the past when they commit regretful actions, acted immoral, fell behind other nations and made huge military, economic or political errors. So no people or faith is above this thus there is no need to abuse, mock or attack others nations, faiths or cultures in comparison to your own faith, nation or culture based on historical facts. Number 1 lesson from history we are greatest when we put are differences aside and work together for a better future.
Golden Point - Ottoman ie Sunni & Persan ie Shia Architecture is more Grandiose and usually built of Marble and it has offensive meaning and it is Blunt
If you can read Arabic alphabet go take a look at the Safavid map drawn by the Ottoman, Ibrahim Muteferrika, in which he wrote the name Iran as the country name of the Safavid empire And according to the Ottoman book, Qamus al Alam, page 67, the Azerbaijan in Iran is the one and only Azerbaijan and your's is a fake and just stole the name and your country's real and only name is Aran Here are some sources Iranian Azeris from Tabriz and Ardebil gave me Western : There are books such as : Safavid Iran the rebirth of a Persian empire by Andrew J Newman, Patterns of wisdom in Safavid Iran by Janis Esots, German sources on Safavid Persia translated and annotated by Willem Floor, Nader Shah the sword of Persia and Empire of the mind A history of Iran by Michael Axworthy, Shah Abbas the ruthless king who became an Iranian legend Ottoman : Səfəvi qaydalarını qeyri-İran mənbələrindən bilmək üçün aşağıdakı kitabları oxuya bilərsiniz Bu kitablar ya Osmanlılar tərəfindən yazılır, ya da xaricilər tərəfindən İran və Səfəvilər haqqında yazılmış səyahət dəftərləri. Səfəvilər, Monqol istilasından sonra bütün İran yaylasını bir bayraq altında uçuran ilk ümum İran höküməti idi. Onların səyahət kitabçasını oxuyun The Venetians in Iran Anthony Jan Kinson Shirley Brothers Dengarcia de Siliva Figueroa Itopresser Sycom Peter Delawale Adam Olearius Tavernier Campfer Jean Chardin Krosinsky Sanson Stoddart Ashten Metz və John Barak tərəfindən İran, Chaldoran və Yunanistan Şah Jang İran və Səfəvi tarixini oxumaq üçün Osmanlı mənbələrindən (İran və Səfəvi düşmənləri) istifadə edə bilərsiniz. Səfəvilik və İranın Osmanlı Tarixnamələri: Həsən Begzadənin tarixi Dərviş Əhməd Monjami Başinin müəllifi olduğu Səhif əl-Əxbar Solaghzadeh tarixi Məhəmməd Əfəndi Solagzzade Mustafa Naima tərəfindən Naima tarixi Pachoui tarixi Ebrahim Effendi Pachoui tərəfindən Katlk Çələbinin müəllifi olduğu Fazlkeh Mustafa Əfəndi Səfinin yazdığı ən yaxşı salnamələr.
@@darkodonnie2729 Turkish are also a Turkic group named Oghuz so all of them are just Turks. Brits call Oghuzs as Turkish but the term Turkic has no meaning in Turks they are all Turks just different main branches like Kazakh Oghuz etc. so in short annoying Brits just called the most Western Turks as Turkish because they were the most interacted ones with West. It has no meaning in Turkish or Turkic culture stop indicating it constantly like it is a proper term or means something use the term Turk or call them by their names Turkic is just dumb Brit made term who knew nothing about structure of Turks.
@@dominicj7977not here to fight with you most of the Muslims in subcontinent are converted from Hinduism but Mang Turks/Mughals muslims do live in subcontinent specially in Pakistan
Golden Point - Mughal or Indian Muslim Architecture mostly used Red Sandstone and the Buildings were built for Utility Purpose with the exception of a few Royalty Building like the Taj Mahal.
@@GafuriMalik You are right, but Mughal Empire was established turkic tribes, and ministers, judges, and army was consisting of turkic mostly. For why language of elite was turkic
Turkish Turks who are still pure, with square faces and slanted eyes, Turkish/Turkish Turks who have mixed with Balkan people who live in Antolia, They call it modern Türkiye which has only left behind language and historical heritage
@user-sn3wj5xb2i Turkic is a language family. Turks in Anatolia are speaking Turkish . So we are Turkic too. We are culturally and by language Turkic.
@@EmirateOfHind that's why only muslam loves him ,none of the natives had any interest in him , That's why he became the reason of decline of its own empire 😂 ,if you don't change yourself according to native, Natives will definitely take you down if not today , then tomorrow, That's why he only celebrated among you outsiders losers ,natives don't give F, since he was just regular outsider, who can't maintain his rule for long , while natives ruled for thousands of years , It's not about hindu or muslam ,Even greeks invaded india ,huns invaded, Scythians etc.but those who didn't Changed themselves according yo natives ,always kicked out😂😂🍼🍼
People keep saying "all of them arw turks" Like it's some achievement in their lives lol Even if the dynasty was turkic the country was still called Iran or india and their legacy was still Iranian or Indian. Azerbaijan doesn't even have the sames alphabet as the Safavids let alone the language lol. But Iran does.
In all of them Empires rulers, most ministers, judges and especially army was turkic, but official languages was mixed turkic-persian-arabic-hindi-urdu.
Safavids were talking Turkish. Their army was based on Turkmen light cavalry. Modern İran has atleast 25 million Oghuz Turk population. I cant understand persian but i can communicate with each of those Turkmens.
There’s no such thing as a Turkic Iran, only brain dead Azeris. Ask a Kurd what a Turk is, they’ll tell you it’s a new development in the past few hundred years. You know, because they’ve been there for thousands of years as opposed to saljuk Turks from Mongolia.
@@mirvan5478 The Barlas clan is of Turkic origin, not Mongolian, and Timur also comes from this tribe. In addition, Shah Ismail the founder of the Safavids, was of alevi Kyzilbash Turkmen origin. At that time, there was no place called Kurdistan.
It is anbinteresting but often over-looked fact that the the founders of all three empires were of Turkic origin. (Some claim Safavids were of Kurdish origin).
@@ByIlgaz The safavids were kurdish from their fathers but mixed from their mothers, the mughals were mongols from their fathers and mixed from their mothers, the ottomans were Turkish from their fathers and mixed from their mothers, please don't appropriate history and enjoy the way things are 👍🫡
Timurid once said: if God is the sole ruler in the sky, then I am the sole ruler on earth. Thousands of elephants from India were mobilized to conquer the Ottomans. So the Ottoman focus was no longer Europe. But facing a much tougher enemy, the Timurid
Half of the Mughal kings had Persian and Turkic ancestry from paternal side and rajput ancestry from maternal side. Rajputs and Mughals had alliance and often rajput princess were married to Mughal kings. Thus one can see Hindu temples in between the Mughal palaces in Delhi which were mainly for the rajput queens. The later part of Mughal empire had Majorily rajput descent kings. Pashtuns were the one who worked in the army of hindustan in bulk numbers while Many pashtuns tried to ally with rajputs to rebel against Mughal during the time of Aurangzeb
@@alpha-vs1fxHalf of the Mughal kings had Persian and Turkic ancestry from paternal side and rajput ancestry from maternal side. Rajputs and Mughals had alliance and often rajput princess were married to Mughal kings. Thus one can see Hindu temples in between the Mughal palaces in Delhi which were mainly for the rajput queens. The later part of Mughal empire had Majorily rajput descent kings. Pashtuns were the one who worked in the army of hindustan in bulk numbers while Many pashtuns tried to ally with rajputs to rebel against Mughal during the time of Aurangzeb
12:00 skender beg real name was Geroge Kastrios he was greek on his father side and his father was bueried in a greek monestery while his monther Voyislava was a serbian princes from Balshich family
There are books that are written at that time “marlin barleti”get some knowledge before saying anything stupid again and learn to write the names and surnames I’m sure you don’t even know that skanderbeg monument is all over the world
@@Agastyasharma9796 yep exactly cause no empire was even close to defeat Marathas even after Panipat cause Marathas recovered but internal conflicts didn't 😔
@@Agastyasharma9796Gorkhas were not expanding they were defeated by Sikhs. Infact, They paid tribute to Maharaja Ranjit Singh for not expanding below Satlej.
Who cares, in the end, muslims still defeated them at the third battle of panipat decisively, despite being outnumbered, guess pillaging and chauth didn't help them much
@@EmirateOfHind this is the problem with you guys you just can't accept someones culture or someone's pride in there history and Valour of there ancestors , when someone praises Marathas guys like you cry about how Panipat happened, every hunters story will be glorified until the Lion learns to write is the exact case of Mughal Empire I love islamic history In general but we need to accept the fact that they murdered the culture of others.
@@AnatolianHittiteMorocco defeated the ottomans and the Portuguese and Spanish what puppets are you talking about you don’t know nothing about history if you say that
@@circa1993 The mouse touched the mountain and said, "I f!cked the mountain.The Ottomans and any major player did not directly fight your small desert kingdom.And don't send any more refugees to Turkey.
@@Spartan_Disiplin in your dreams history is there it was a civil war between the saadian dynasty and the ottomans yes they where defeated shut the F Up
The fact that three of them were founded by TURKS! And at the same time in Central Asia was controlled by Shaybanid Turks. Man this was the Golden age of Turks.
@@saruulsurenjav5099 say whatever you want. They came from Turkic land. Talked Turkic. Wrote their poems and memories in Turkic. Were proud of their Turkic ancestors and history in their memory books. After all these many facts, whatever you say has no weight
@@Kurdish20226 Origin is turkic. Everybody mixes with the people where they live. central asiand got mixed with persians too. Baburids mixed with local indians. Ottamon got mixed with arabs greeks and armenians you cannot do anything about that. But they still stayed Turkic
@@top10thingintheworld29 why would you say indian? and not pakistani? Pakistan claims to be a sucess or of the mughals but I don't really see it, but would you say India because they married more of current day india than current day pakistan?
Akbar from the moghuls established the ,"Din ilahi "which is a deviation from islam.Akbar also married Rajput( hindu) royalty and soon after gave up islam and started incorporating all sorts of isms into his new found religion....so starts the decline of a great empire!
@@strawhat9319 cope. Whole world knows the greatness of the ottoman,Safavid and Mughal empires. These are the famous gun powder empires of the world and many people respect them. Even here in the west many people learn about these empires as they have a sense of enigma to them. It’s only the people with inferiority complex who hate such great empires. You cannot do anything as these empires have existed for centuries and have vanished as well. It is important to accept history and the legacy of the great empires of the world. Roman Empire,Persian empire, the Great Britain empire, the French empire , the Spanish empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Safavid empire, the Islamic caliphates , the Mughal empire, the Timurid empire, the tang dynasty , the ancient Egyptian empire, the Mesopotamian empire etc etc are great empires that many people respect. Your opinion will not change their legacy and history sadly🤷♂️
@@yerekebake2090 No Qazalbash were only one of brigades of the Safavid army and their number was 65,000!! During Shah Abbas Rules all of them were expelled from the Safavid army and moved to Afghanistan And Then Kumanj Nomad Replaced With Them !
@@EsfandiarNokhodaki Not really. Kizilbash was at the foundation of the State of Savafids. They played a major role at the beginning of the State. Later Abbas started to replace them with the Gulyams (mainly Circassians and Georgians). Of course, Kizilbash was not replaced completely. Till the end of the Safavids, kizilbash played the major role. After the Safavids, another Turkic power took Iran: Nader Shah and Qajars.
@@yerekebake2090 The Safavids were Turks! The founder of the Safavid Empire Shah Ismayil 1, was also the Azerbaijani poet under the pen name Khatai. He proclaimed the Azerbaijani language as the language of his Empire. Read poems of Shah Ismayil Khatai.
Thank you for your good video. I say this to those who believe that Afshar Safavi and Qajar are Turks First of all, there are archival sources, including the book, that during the time of Shah Abbas, Persian was declared as the official and middle language, and Shah Ismail chose the names of his children from the Shahnameh, like his successor (Shah Tahmasb). ). And except for those paintings written in Farsi next to Shah Safavi, owner of Iran and many other documents.... Those tourists who come to this land, all bring the name of Iran, even in the letters that were exchanged between Safavid or Afshar and Ottoman kings, the king of Iran named Khosrow or Dariush Zaman is mentioned. There are many documents about Qajar. For example, the National Bank of Iran, the National Council of Iran, all of these were built in the Qajar period, or the Khaqan literary association by order of Fath Ali Shah or the next king of Iran, Reza Shah, from the Pahlavi dynasty, had the highest military and political position in the Qajar period. Or the recorded voice of Muzaffaruddin Shah speaking in Farsi and mentioning the name of Iran. And the travel letters of Muzaffar al-Din Shah and Naser al-Din Shah, which are all Persian, and the name of Iran appears in them many times. Or in the contracts written with foreign countries, the name of Iran is written in it and nothing else Apart from that, all the important cities or capitals of these dynasties are in today's Iran and not outside the borders of today's Iran. Do not forget that most of the present-day countries of the Middle East belonged to Iran for a long time and were separated from Iran during the Qajar period. (part of Iran's civilization basin) The agreements that caused the separation of large areas from Iran during the Qajar era include: Golestan, Turkmenchai, Akhal Paris and... And don't forget that these periods that we say are the peak of the growth of Persian culture and literature in history, Persian language was the official language in India and Iran at that time. And in the Ottoman Empire, Persian is the language of the courtiers. (The language of poetry at this time is Persian) There are many cultural exchanges between Ottoman Iran and India. For example, take a look at the buildings built in Gorkani, India, such as the Taj Mahal, which was built by Iranian architects.
Just because Safavids use persian names dont make them Persian. According to your Logic if a müslim's name in Indonesia is Ali , he is arab lol. Iranian land were ruled by Turks for hundreds of years. Shah ismail wrote his poems in Turkish. Bc he was Turkish. Hard to accept pill for you
Dude, my name is Persian, but I'm not. Persian culture has huge influence in Turkish culture. A fun fact: Ismail wrote his letters to Selim in pure Turkish, whereas Selim wrote in Persian.
Im seeing that many people saying that they were 3 great turkish state but they are not first' they were muslim they spread islam and rebuilt it again and make it great again after the destruction by the mongols this was the second islamic golden era lead by turko muslims i dont why people forget that there ancestors fight for the islam not for nationalism
The Persian emperor, Nader, the leader of Iran and India, conquered Iran and India. He deserves a video about himself (Napoleon is called Europe's rare).
Nader never conquered India. He just raided Delhi in 1739 CE and went back. Also he was Turk not Persian. Another fact Marathas had already raided Delhi in 1737 CE and virtually made Mughals their vassals. So the Mughals held no real power in 1739 CE when Nader attacked
Then Vlad of the Order Of Dragon became a Transylvanian, a Count and a vampire and sailed off to the Yorkshire coast in pursuit of London teal estate, at least after Bram Stoker got ahold of the story lol.
Idot after Babar all of the Mughal rulers called themselves that they are from Subcontinent not from Uzbekistan and many Mughals and Turkic people do live in Pakistan as well although Pakistan history is Indus valley civilization the oldest civilization of the world.
@@theupdated5931 no turks live in pak its only the upper caste converts to islam who claim that they are turks or arabs to raise there social status and indus valley is ofc indian civilisation and has nothing to do with pakistan
What's your favorite of these gunpowder empires?
The Ottomans, for sure.
the mughal
Flame thrower
Savavid
The great Mughals
Truly an excellent documentary. The in depth coverage of these three islamic gunpowder empires was truly spot on. Its is somewhat difficult to find documentaries on the Safavids on the Internet as the material left behind is more scarce compared to the ottomans and mughals, so it was refreshing to see a documentary that covers all 3 in good detail. Well done!
Thank you! That means a lot!
No distortion, no lying, no negative advertising
Very accurate and good
Thank you for being honest
Dont forget the armenian genocide 1915
@@Andres-v7r2h The Ottoman sultan was a puppet by that time that was carried out by turkish nationalists in the army and head of operation was enver pasha "Ottoman empire did genocide!!! 😭😭😭"
This video was a fascinating overview of the three gunpowder empires of the early modern world: the Ottoman Empire, Safavid Iran, and Mughal India.
I was particularly interested in learning about the Ottoman Empire's use of the Janissary corps, a professional standing army that played a key role in the empire's expansion. I also found the discussion of the Safavid Empire's religious policies and the Mughal Empire's cultural achievements to be very informative.
The quality of this video is incredible, congratulations bro 🍷
Much appreciated! I’m glad you’re liking it!
@@MadeInHistory “The American missionary Eli Smith and G. H. O. Dwight, who traveled through turkey at the beginning of the nineteenth century observed that the turkomans were generally called Turks by the Ottomans, who abhorred the name Turk and proffered to be called Musalmans (Muslims). To the Ottomans, “turk” was a name that belonged to the people of Turkestan and the nomadic hordes who roamed the steppes of khurrusan. They considered themselves civilized Ottomans, and could not understand why Europeans called them Turks. As a sophisticated ruling class, the Ottomans looked down upon the Turkish peasantry, calling them esek Turk (Donkey Turk), and kaba turk (stupid turk). Expressions like “turk-head” and “turk-person” were contemptuously used by ottomans when they wanted to denigrate each other.”
Spent appx. 5 wk. in Turkiye, '90. Studied a bit before, learned more since. Seen more ovvit than many ovvits citizens ! Beautiful, generous people at core. Fascinating history. Memories I treasure.
I am amazed at the detail and accuracy of your videos and you present them so beautifully!
Thanks! That means a lot! Glad you enjoyed it
I’m using these to sleep at 0.5 speed because they are relaxing. Also listening when awake cause they rock lol. Great content.
That is such an impressive documentary with incredible gentle toning and a very professional platform
People need to not forget Ertugrul Ghazi, the father of Osman.
I see Ertugrul Ghazi as the real founder, that set the seeds
Ertugrul,that brown,skinny Turk 😮
Ertrugul is a fictional character from comic book
@@dominicj7977 No, he was real. We have minted coins which mention "Osman, son of Ertuğrul". But the only thing we know for certain about him is that he existed. That's it. The current famous Turkish drama is filled with artistic imagination.
@@IMasterSkeptic Got a problem cow worshipper?
Ertugrul was a governor of seljuq he didn't found the empire it was purely uthman
Thank you bro! you did it really well
3 Muslim Powers. 2 Superpowers. Ottomans for conquest, Mughal for economy.
Mughal Empire conquests were impressive considering the population and military size.
It's a shame that Muslims have seemingly peaked (militarily, technologically, economically and culturally) in the 17th century. The only way to recover now is to join the Space Race and carve out colonies on other planets, or else we'll stay behind.
Insha'Allāh, we will do it. Hopefully more Muslim states take inspiration from the UAE's Mars 2117 vision.
Mughal for economy? What was their economic policy? What were their innovations? Did they promote education, innovation and entrepreneurship? India was the largest economy purely because of its size of the geography & population, and Europe was only starting to industrialize at that time. Mughals, if anything, were a disaster for the Indian economy.
@@patmclaughlin107 cope and seeth westoid
@@SafavidAfsharid3197 What?
As an APWH teacher, I love your videos!
Thank you
We learn a lot
Thank you for your great video.
Thank you for putting Safavid Persians on your video
Greetings from Irān
Safavids arent persians,they are turkic,and ancient of modern Azerbaijan people
@@EverestElbrus Oh really?! Where's your proof? Where's your evidence? Let's see how you wanna steal our history
@@EverestElbrus Proof?
@@EverestElbrus where's your proof to steal Persian history?
@@PersianPatriot434 i am turkman from Ardebil,and my people who created Safevid dinasty
Good documentary
The most interesting thing about these three empires is that all three of them have Turkic-Mongolic roots!
Maybe mughal empire but safavids and ottomans had nothing with the mongols. They were fleeing from them
In short converted ones😂
Safavid and Ottomans were turkic but fighting against each other on more territories@@subutaykhan9387
@@IMasterSkeptic you have cognitive issues. You should go to some neurologist.
What’s interesting is that all three empires had Persian culture, The Turks migrated to this region about 1k years ago and basically adopted the Persian culture.
A cannon strapped to a camel. Now that’s badass
Great video
Thanks! It means a lot!
I'm like, 90% sure there was a 3D model of Suleimon from Civ 5 or 6...nice! Also, more great history, thanks! I think I'm a bit more educated on the Ottomans, so their story is most interesting to me since I can tie Ottoman history with broader European history... :)
Yes it’s used in Civ 5! Glad the video was helpful!
I think this video skipped a pretty significant event in Ottoman history. Mehmed II's reign wasn't as seamless as him fighting Hunyadi and then conquering Constantinople. He had 2 reigns, the first where he was only a child and Hunyadi and the Christians went to fight him, causing him to give the throne back to his father. And then, when his father died, he reclaimed the throne at an older age (only 19 though, but still) and went to conquer Constantiople.
Also, a more in depth overview of the Sultanate of Women and the various overthrows in the early 17th century would help with the context of Ottoman stagnation.
love the thumbnail
Being a Chagatai MUGHAL , i appreciate u told about mnay things . I may not know about them ... Thankyou for making vedio on Mughals 🇺🇿🇲🇳
Thanks bro 👍👍
I love the way they build their homes. Their artifacts,arts. Talented.
I am Shah Ismail, the shahanshah of Iranzamin🇮🇷☀️🦁
Golden Point - Mughal Muslim Architecture is far more intelligent and subtle and down to Earth.
Well these Gunpowder Empires were Strong as you know Empires rise and fall 😳
Shah Ismael poem : Yetdükce tükenür Arab’un kûy u meskeni, Bağdad içinde her nece kim Türkman kopar Sen ey Türk-i peri peyker, ecaib sün-i Yezdan’san Görenden berü ruh-sarun, sözüm, Allahu ekber’dir. Ey Hatâî! Şol Huten Türki saçınun şemmesi, Nafe-yi sehraya saldı belki misk ü enberi!.
Wonderful 😂❤ thanks ❤ so much good luck
Thank you! 😃
Each one is amazing in its own way and yet share similarities.They brought great military,political,Economic art and culture influences to the world.
It is not mughal empire, it is Baburid empire
Golden Point - Mughal Architecture or Indian Muslim Architecture is quite different from any of the other Muslim Architectures ie Ottomans, Persians, Arabs etc
Safavid, Qajar, Afshar are the states founded by the Turkish dynasties of Iran. The states founded by the Iranian Azerbaijanis.
Why do turks keep repeating this nonsense? Safavid Iranian 🇮🇷 Empire was founded by Kurdish/Iranian roots. They had many turkomen tribe soldiers. Safavid empire ki_lled alot of invading turks ottoman and uzbek.
Mongols also had alot of turk soldiers those that ra_ped and murd_ered.
Safavid family origin from Iranian Kurdistan later they moved to azeribjian and turkfied they are originally Kurd but turkifed
@@mirvan5478 Iranian kurd
@@mirvan5478idiot did you ever read the poems of Shah Ismail... He wrote in Turkish before the ottoman sultan wrote it!
@@mirvan5478 the founder of the Dynasty is from Erdebil, southern Azerbaycan. Kurds have nothing to do there. Stop spreading false info. Shah İsmail was writing his poems in Turkish. His army was mostly Turkmen light cavalry. Thats why he lost against ottomans bc ottomans were using canons.
Good documentary, but it's missing the wars between Ottomans and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The battle of Chocim in 1621: the army of the Commonwealth with Zaporoshian Cossacks defended the massive siege of the Ottoman army led by Sultan Osman II himself.
Some people's racsim (I included in this is being disrespectful etc towards other faiths be it Christianity, Islam or whatever), nationalism and patriotism is disgusting.
We should learn history to understand the past; learn lessons for the future and to better understand the present plus we can take pride in anything good our people did/accomplished in the past.
But we should not let the past make us so full of pride or anger towards otherd that we become racist (I included in this is being disrespectful etc towards other faiths be it Christianity, Islam or whatever) and/or nationalist and/or patriotic in a bad way.
Every nation and faith has a past full of glory, golden times and excellent achievements. However every nation and faith has times in the past when they commit regretful actions, acted immoral, fell behind other nations and made huge military, economic or political errors.
So no people or faith is above this thus there is no need to abuse, mock or attack others nations, faiths or cultures in comparison to your own faith, nation or culture based on historical facts.
Number 1 lesson from history we are greatest when we put are differences aside and work together for a better future.
Yes!!!!! Thank you for sharing this marvelous message.❤
Tulips were a highlight in the Muslim Ottoman empire lonnng before the Netherlands 😊
Golden Point - Ottoman ie Sunni & Persan ie Shia Architecture is more Grandiose and usually built of Marble and it has offensive meaning and it is Blunt
I would also add to this list also Ming China and Muscovite Russia. Russian landed serving gentry system was very close to Ottoman timar system.
Three great TURKIC Empires spread across the Eurasia!
If you can read Arabic alphabet go take a look at the Safavid map drawn by the Ottoman, Ibrahim Muteferrika, in which he wrote the name Iran as the country name of the Safavid empire
And according to the Ottoman book, Qamus al Alam, page 67, the Azerbaijan in Iran is the one and only Azerbaijan and your's is a fake and just stole the name and your country's real and only name is Aran
Here are some sources Iranian Azeris from Tabriz and Ardebil gave me
Western :
There are books such as : Safavid Iran the rebirth of a Persian empire by Andrew J Newman, Patterns of wisdom in Safavid Iran by Janis Esots, German sources on Safavid Persia translated and annotated by Willem Floor, Nader Shah the sword of Persia and Empire of the mind A history of Iran by Michael Axworthy, Shah Abbas the ruthless king who became an Iranian legend
Ottoman :
Səfəvi qaydalarını qeyri-İran mənbələrindən bilmək üçün aşağıdakı kitabları oxuya bilərsiniz
Bu kitablar ya Osmanlılar tərəfindən yazılır, ya da xaricilər tərəfindən İran və Səfəvilər haqqında yazılmış səyahət dəftərləri.
Səfəvilər, Monqol istilasından sonra bütün İran yaylasını bir bayraq altında uçuran ilk ümum İran höküməti idi.
Onların səyahət kitabçasını oxuyun
The Venetians in Iran
Anthony Jan Kinson
Shirley Brothers
Dengarcia de Siliva Figueroa
Itopresser Sycom
Peter Delawale
Adam Olearius
Tavernier
Campfer
Jean Chardin
Krosinsky
Sanson
Stoddart
Ashten Metz və John Barak tərəfindən İran, Chaldoran və Yunanistan Şah Jang
İran və Səfəvi tarixini oxumaq üçün Osmanlı mənbələrindən (İran və Səfəvi düşmənləri) istifadə edə bilərsiniz.
Səfəvilik və İranın Osmanlı Tarixnamələri:
Həsən Begzadənin tarixi
Dərviş Əhməd Monjami Başinin müəllifi olduğu Səhif əl-Əxbar
Solaghzadeh tarixi Məhəmməd Əfəndi Solagzzade
Mustafa Naima tərəfindən Naima tarixi
Pachoui tarixi Ebrahim Effendi Pachoui tərəfindən
Katlk Çələbinin müəllifi olduğu Fazlkeh
Mustafa Əfəndi Səfinin yazdığı ən yaxşı salnamələr.
Turkish contribution to society out of the main steppe talent Splendid archery on horseback raiding
@@darkodonnie2729 Turkish are also a Turkic group named Oghuz so all of them are just Turks. Brits call Oghuzs as Turkish but the term Turkic has no meaning in Turks they are all Turks just different main branches like Kazakh Oghuz etc. so in short annoying Brits just called the most Western Turks as Turkish because they were the most interacted ones with West. It has no meaning in Turkish or Turkic culture stop indicating it constantly like it is a proper term or means something use the term Turk or call them by their names Turkic is just dumb Brit made term who knew nothing about structure of Turks.
Tell that to the turks. The only worth mentioned or studied people are the mongols. Those that went eastwords (china)
@@ww2wall561meanwhile aryans way before turks (i.e. ~ 4000 BCE) 😎
Golden Point - The penalties for locks and keys are linked to hl epn fit value and they increase correspondingly with that ie seperately ( Azp )
Allah Səfəvi Şahlarını Rəhmət Etsin İnşAllah🤲Amin Ya Rəbbəl Aləmim
Shais were always better than Sunnis,right from first fitna
Safavid 🇮🇷
@@KoroushRP The Safavids are Azerbaijan and Iran
@@KoroushRP Uzun Hasan'ın kızı Şah İsmail'in annesidir. Safeviler Türk devletidir
@@Samanyolu-ov1yk Babürlüler de, yani Mughal da bir Türk devletidir.
Would you be able to provide sources for this video? looking for some further reading.
🥰 I am Chagatai Barlas MUGHAL (Turco-Mongol) from Pakistan 🇵🇰
Pakistan is definitely the successor of these turkic kingdoms of South Asia
May be do a dna test. You are probably a bihari from india
@@dominicj7977not here to fight with you most of the Muslims in subcontinent are converted from Hinduism but Mang Turks/Mughals muslims do live in subcontinent specially in Pakistan
Fake ?
@@baburkhanmansurkhanov266
U fake
🥰 Yes i am Chagatai Turco-Mongol (Mughal) from Pakistan 🇵🇰
R
A really excellent factual documentary.
Basically Uzbek khanate was gunpower after Timurid empire but they can't reach pick as these 3 empires
Uzbeks khanates inherited the legacy of Timurids, they had the superior culture, better architecture, than ottomans and safavids.
@@TerrorbelliDecuspacis-w5fOsmanlı ve safaviden üstün kültür ??? Hahahah
Golden Point - Mughal or Indian Muslim Architecture mostly used Red Sandstone and the Buildings were built for Utility Purpose with the exception of a few Royalty Building like the Taj Mahal.
From India to Viana Turks are everywhere, either as rulers or fighters, despite their limited number of population.
They were not turk but mongolic and mixed indians
Safavids were Persians
This is the IMPORTANCE of HISTORY
Safavids, Seljuks, Ozbeks, Safavids, Mamluks and Mughals were all Turkic or Proto-Turkic
No
Mughals weren’t all JUST Turkic
Heritage of Mughals were very diverse don't limit them to just being a Turkic.
@@GafuriMalik You are right, but Mughal Empire was established turkic tribes, and ministers, judges, and army was consisting of turkic mostly. For why language of elite was turkic
Hazars, Ottomans, Golden Horde, Karahanids, Uyghurs...😊
Wht's the difference between the words "Turkic" and "Turkish"?
Turkic is Uzbek, Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Uyghur, Tatar etc. It's mean language group. Turkish means people who lived in modern Turkiye
Turkish Turks who are still pure, with square faces and slanted eyes, Turkish/Turkish Turks who have mixed with Balkan people who live in Antolia, They call it modern Türkiye which has only left behind language and historical heritage
@user-sn3wj5xb2i Turkic is a language family. Turks in Anatolia are speaking Turkish . So we are Turkic too. We are culturally and by language Turkic.
All same ,,it is plastic name given them to stop them unified,,,stalin ideolgy
th-cam.com/video/gpl0UynX_zo/w-d-xo.htmlsi=2wQB-X2OdZ-62Mi5
Man the Mughals story is so sad they were such a cool empire with next gen policies.
Their legacy was cool initially unitil akbar , And when Aurangzeb came ,it was already knew that's empire gonna fcuked up
@@_Bappu_ Aurangzeb was badass, only lindus hate him, he transformed a sickular empire to a giga chad proper islamic empire
@@EmirateOfHind that's why only muslam loves him ,none of the natives had any interest in him , That's why he became the reason of decline of its own empire 😂 ,if you don't change yourself according to native, Natives will definitely take you down if not today , then tomorrow, That's why he only celebrated among you outsiders losers ,natives don't give F, since he was just regular outsider, who can't maintain his rule for long , while natives ruled for thousands of years , It's not about hindu or muslam ,Even greeks invaded india ,huns invaded, Scythians etc.but those who didn't Changed themselves according yo natives ,always kicked out😂😂🍼🍼
What is Kazakh khanate and Dzhungars empire? The last standing nomad empire
People keep saying "all of them arw turks" Like it's some achievement in their lives lol
Even if the dynasty was turkic the country was still called Iran or india and their legacy was still Iranian or Indian.
Azerbaijan doesn't even have the sames alphabet as the Safavids let alone the language lol.
But Iran does.
Yes all of them are Turks - and about you , bro just try are not a Turkophobe!
@@atilaataman5752Mughals were mix of Turk-Indian very much. Culture was Indian-Persian and Empire was Indian.
In all of them Empires rulers, most ministers, judges and especially army was turkic, but official languages was mixed turkic-persian-arabic-hindi-urdu.
Safavids were talking Turkish. Their army was based on Turkmen light cavalry. Modern İran has atleast 25 million Oghuz Turk population. I cant understand persian but i can communicate with each of those Turkmens.
why does this channel use AI voice. Plz hier a voice over artist
All of these empires are of Turkic origin.
There’s no such thing as a Turkic Iran, only brain dead Azeris. Ask a Kurd what a Turk is, they’ll tell you it’s a new development in the past few hundred years. You know, because they’ve been there for thousands of years as opposed to saljuk Turks from Mongolia.
And two of the used farsi for court language and celebrated nowruz
Mughals are mongol origin from barlas mongol tribe
And Safavid family origin from Iranian Kurdistan later they moved to azeribjian and turkifed they are not turk but turkifed Kurds
@@mirvan5478 The Barlas clan is of Turkic origin, not Mongolian, and Timur also comes from this tribe. In addition, Shah Ismail the founder of the Safavids, was of alevi Kyzilbash Turkmen origin. At that time, there was no place called Kurdistan.
Painting at 38:36?
Golden Point - The Mughals were from Uzbekistan ie a province of Russia and not from Iran/Iraq
provinse of Russia ? Fu*k you mind
Three great Turkish and Muslim empires, Ottoman, Safavid and Gurkanian.
58:06 Dodo 😳
🤣😂
Golden Point - It is widely believed that the Mughals were from Persia ie Iran/Iran
Mughal were from Uzbekistan 🇺🇿
3 TURKIC EMPIRES, HELLO FROM LAND OF TEMUR 🇺🇿🫡
@GodlessTurk But scientists say Turkic that's why I call turkic bro🇺🇿🇰🇬🇹🇲🇹🇷🇦🇿🇰🇿🫡
@@Napolitano-Lazo Only people of Turkiye is turkish
It is anbinteresting but often over-looked fact that the the founders of all three empires were of Turkic origin.
(Some claim Safavids were of Kurdish origin).
3 Turk brothers 😎EMPIRE TURKS HASE 16 EMPIRES IN THE HISTORY 😎🐺🤘 BUT THE LEGEND IS OTTOMAN THE STRONGERS EMPIRE IN THE TIME 🙋♂️
Taimr Empire > Ottoman empire
Me when I'm in a faking history competition and my opponent is a turk: 💀
@@MuhammadThakur-si9ot Rulers of mughal, safavid and ottoman empires were Turkish you can check it up
@@ByIlgaz The safavids were kurdish from their fathers but mixed from their mothers, the mughals were mongols from their fathers and mixed from their mothers, the ottomans were Turkish from their fathers and mixed from their mothers, please don't appropriate history and enjoy the way things are 👍🫡
Timurid once said: if God is the sole ruler in the sky, then I am the sole ruler on earth. Thousands of elephants from India were mobilized to conquer the Ottomans. So the Ottoman focus was no longer Europe. But facing a much tougher enemy, the Timurid
Actually mughul empire was mostly pasthun mongols and turks at the end
Mughals were not pashtuns at any point. They were more rajput than pashtun.
Half of the Mughal kings had Persian and Turkic ancestry from paternal side and rajput ancestry from maternal side. Rajputs and Mughals had alliance and often rajput princess were married to Mughal kings. Thus one can see Hindu temples in between the Mughal palaces in Delhi which were mainly for the rajput queens. The later part of Mughal empire had Majorily rajput descent kings. Pashtuns were the one who worked in the army of hindustan in bulk numbers while Many pashtuns tried to ally with rajputs to rebel against Mughal during the time of Aurangzeb
@@alpha-vs1fxHalf of the Mughal kings had Persian and Turkic ancestry from paternal side and rajput ancestry from maternal side. Rajputs and Mughals had alliance and often rajput princess were married to Mughal kings. Thus one can see Hindu temples in between the Mughal palaces in Delhi which were mainly for the rajput queens. The later part of Mughal empire had Majorily rajput descent kings. Pashtuns were the one who worked in the army of hindustan in bulk numbers while Many pashtuns tried to ally with rajputs to rebel against Mughal during the time of Aurangzeb
Holy Roman empire history please make video
12:00 skender beg real name was Geroge Kastrios he was greek on his father side and his father was bueried in a greek monestery while his monther Voyislava was a serbian princes from Balshich family
Just google it before talking shit
@@michelecantelli5248 thats your source of knowlage???? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
No it’s not but I’ve checked it and it’s correct
There are books that are written at that time “marlin barleti”get some knowledge before saying anything stupid again and learn to write the names and surnames I’m sure you don’t even know that skanderbeg monument is all over the world
@@michelecantelli5248 why dont you call him by his real name
42:34
The only mistake Marathas did was to fight within themselves Holkars and Shindes.
@@Agastyasharma9796 yep exactly cause no empire was even close to defeat Marathas even after Panipat cause Marathas recovered but internal conflicts didn't 😔
@@Agastyasharma9796Gorkhas were not expanding they were defeated by Sikhs. Infact, They paid tribute to Maharaja Ranjit Singh for not expanding below Satlej.
Who cares, in the end, muslims still defeated them at the third battle of panipat decisively, despite being outnumbered, guess pillaging and chauth didn't help them much
@@Agastyasharma9796 Im pretty shocked that you are calling mughal empire as indian, first hindu i met who said that lol, but its good
@@EmirateOfHind this is the problem with you guys you just can't accept someones culture or someone's pride in there history and Valour of there ancestors , when someone praises Marathas guys like you cry about how Panipat happened, every hunters story will be glorified until the Lion learns to write is the exact case of Mughal Empire I love islamic history In general but we need to accept the fact that they murdered the culture of others.
There is no mention of Din e Ilahi amongst Akbar's contemporaries. It was a later concoction by British historians.
Why is Morocco not considered a gunpowder empire when they had their own arms industry at the same time
Morocco was never a big player.He became a puppet of big players
@@AnatolianHittiteMorocco defeated the ottomans and the Portuguese and Spanish what puppets are you talking about you don’t know nothing about history if you say that
@@circa1993 The mouse touched the mountain and said, "I f!cked the mountain.The Ottomans and any major player did not directly fight your small desert kingdom.And don't send any more refugees to Turkey.
@@circa1993 Your tiny moracco never defeted Ottomans. In contrary, Ottomans conquered Fes(capital) two time and vassalized Morocco
@@Spartan_Disiplin in your dreams history is there it was a civil war between the saadian dynasty and the ottomans yes they where defeated shut the F Up
2:00 it was byzantines who used the turks against bulgars and serb
The fact that three of them were founded by TURKS! And at the same time in Central Asia was controlled by Shaybanid Turks. Man this was the Golden age of Turks.
Moghul empire is not turkic
@@saruulsurenjav5099 say whatever you want. They came from Turkic land. Talked Turkic. Wrote their poems and memories in Turkic. Were proud of their Turkic ancestors and history in their memory books. After all these many facts, whatever you say has no weight
mughal is hindustani corrupted word for "mongol"
Safavids were not turkic. They were mixed origin and Persianized
@@Kurdish20226 Origin is turkic. Everybody mixes with the people where they live. central asiand got mixed with persians too. Baburids mixed with local indians. Ottamon got mixed with arabs greeks and armenians
you cannot do anything about that. But they still stayed Turkic
Please make a video on Ghuri Afghan empire before and after accepting islam .
safavid ❤😥🇮🇷😎
Safavid Iran was amazing
Ottoman 🇹🇷
Safavid 🇦🇿🇮🇷
Mughal 🇺🇿🇵🇰
Safavid 🇮🇷
Mughal 🇮🇳
@@carljohnson-io1xo
Mughal = 🇺🇿 🇮🇳
@@top10thingintheworld29 why would you say indian? and not pakistani? Pakistan claims to be a sucess or of the mughals but I don't really see it, but would you say India because they married more of current day india than current day pakistan?
Pakistan doesnt exist
Safavid is Iranian turk not Azerbayjan
turkic golden age..
Islamic***
The Byzantine empire was never weak. The ottomans made them look weak.
3 GREAT TURKİC EMPİRE!
Lol 😂Safavids weren't turks,Mughals half turksb😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Turkic or turkish?
Akbar from the moghuls established the ,"Din ilahi "which is a deviation from islam.Akbar also married Rajput( hindu) royalty and soon after gave up islam and started incorporating all sorts of isms into his new found religion....so starts the decline of a great empire!
heard a lot about Aurangzeb the great. love from Japan
But Aurangzeb is not given the title of " The Great ". Only Akbar is given the title of " The great " for obvious reasons.
@@demonslayer3683No one calls them great except Muslims... just like British the great empire.
@@strawhat9319exactly 😂
@@strawhat9319 cope.
Whole world knows the greatness of the ottoman,Safavid and Mughal empires. These are the famous gun powder empires of the world and many people respect them. Even here in the west many people learn about these empires as they have a sense of enigma to them. It’s only the people with inferiority complex who hate such great empires. You cannot do anything as these empires have existed for centuries and have vanished as well. It is important to accept history and the legacy of the great empires of the world.
Roman Empire,Persian empire, the Great Britain empire, the French empire , the Spanish empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Safavid empire, the Islamic caliphates , the Mughal empire, the Timurid empire, the tang dynasty , the ancient Egyptian empire, the Mesopotamian empire etc etc are great empires that many people respect. Your opinion will not change their legacy and history sadly🤷♂️
@@c.vineethrJust like only you call Shivaji I and Pratap Singh I great...
Golden Point - Emmy doesn't give anything if it is going to be misused or exploited or if the intention is there to do the same ( azp )
Anazing. From the gate of Vienna till the Myanmar - all lands were ruled by Turkic Dynasties. It was Turk Age
Safavids Were Kurdish in Orgin
Also Culture, Language and Army all Were Persians !!!
@@EsfandiarNokhodaki no. The ruling class was Kizilbash - the Turkmens
@@yerekebake2090
No
Qazalbash were only one of brigades of the Safavid army and their number was 65,000!! During Shah Abbas Rules all of them were expelled from the Safavid army and moved to Afghanistan And Then Kumanj Nomad Replaced With Them !
@@EsfandiarNokhodaki Not really. Kizilbash was at the foundation of the State of Savafids. They played a major role at the beginning of the State. Later Abbas started to replace them with the Gulyams (mainly Circassians and Georgians). Of course, Kizilbash was not replaced completely. Till the end of the Safavids, kizilbash played the major role. After the Safavids, another Turkic power took Iran: Nader Shah and Qajars.
@@yerekebake2090 The Safavids were Turks! The founder of the Safavid Empire Shah Ismayil 1, was also the Azerbaijani poet under the pen name Khatai. He proclaimed the Azerbaijani language as the language of his Empire. Read poems of Shah Ismayil Khatai.
Golden Point - Same thing with having or using anything that is not yours without the owners permission ( azp )
Three great TURK Empires spread across the Eurasia!
Savavids were also Turks, Turks ruled all of them for many centuries!
Safavids were Persian-Kurds not turkic
@@KoroushRP there is no kurd for 1600
The Mughals ceased to be Turks a few generations after Babur.
Ismail Safavi had a Greek mother
Thank you for your good video. I say this to those who believe that Afshar Safavi and Qajar are Turks
First of all, there are archival sources, including the book, that during the time of Shah Abbas, Persian was declared as the official and middle language, and Shah Ismail chose the names of his children from the Shahnameh, like his successor (Shah Tahmasb). ).
And except for those paintings written in Farsi next to Shah Safavi, owner of Iran and many other documents....
Those tourists who come to this land, all bring the name of Iran, even in the letters that were exchanged between Safavid or Afshar and Ottoman kings, the king of Iran named Khosrow or Dariush Zaman is mentioned.
There are many documents about Qajar. For example, the National Bank of Iran, the National Council of Iran, all of these were built in the Qajar period, or the Khaqan literary association by order of Fath Ali Shah or the next king of Iran, Reza Shah, from the Pahlavi dynasty, had the highest military and political position in the Qajar period. Or the recorded voice of Muzaffaruddin Shah speaking in Farsi and mentioning the name of Iran. And the travel letters of Muzaffar al-Din Shah and Naser al-Din Shah, which are all Persian, and the name of Iran appears in them many times. Or in the contracts written with foreign countries, the name of Iran is written in it and nothing else
Apart from that, all the important cities or capitals of these dynasties are in today's Iran and not outside the borders of today's Iran.
Do not forget that most of the present-day countries of the Middle East belonged to Iran for a long time and were separated from Iran during the Qajar period.
(part of Iran's civilization basin)
The agreements that caused the separation of large areas from Iran during the Qajar era include: Golestan, Turkmenchai, Akhal Paris and... And don't forget that these periods that we say are the peak of the growth of Persian culture and literature in history, Persian language was the official language in India and Iran at that time.
And in the Ottoman Empire, Persian is the language of the courtiers.
(The language of poetry at this time is Persian)
There are many cultural exchanges between Ottoman Iran and India. For example, take a look at the buildings built in Gorkani, India, such as the Taj Mahal, which was built by Iranian architects.
Just because Safavids use persian names dont make them Persian. According to your Logic if a müslim's name in Indonesia is Ali , he is arab lol. Iranian land were ruled by Turks for hundreds of years. Shah ismail wrote his poems in Turkish. Bc he was Turkish. Hard to accept pill for you
Dude, my name is Persian, but I'm not. Persian culture has huge influence in Turkish culture. A fun fact: Ismail wrote his letters to Selim in pure Turkish, whereas Selim wrote in Persian.
@@serhatdemir3293same could be said about these men. Just because they speak turkish doesnt make them turkic.
Im seeing that many people saying that they were 3 great turkish state but they are not first' they were muslim they spread islam and rebuilt it again and make it great again after the destruction by the mongols this was the second islamic golden era lead by turko muslims i dont why people forget that there ancestors fight for the islam not for nationalism
The Persian emperor, Nader, the leader of Iran and India, conquered Iran and India. He deserves a video about himself (Napoleon is called Europe's rare).
Nadir is turk,Safevids were turks too
Emperor of persians/persia not persian empire lmao
Nader never conquered India. He just raided Delhi in 1739 CE and went back. Also he was Turk not Persian. Another fact Marathas had already raided Delhi in 1737 CE and virtually made Mughals their vassals. So the Mughals held no real power in 1739 CE when Nader attacked
Dude he didnt conqure india he didnt even fought the most powerful indian state at that time (maratha empire )
@@indiafirst3676 based Indian 🗿
Then Vlad of the Order Of Dragon became a Transylvanian, a Count and a vampire and sailed off to the Yorkshire coast in pursuit of London teal estate, at least after Bram Stoker got ahold of the story lol.
all three had the same court language. Farsi
All Armies confirm
All three empires were founded by Turks
What if they United in one.
Won't happen
Mughals and ottomens were split in between by shia saffavid
Don't think they would ever unite
They can't even unite in theology nowadays
three Turkic empires 😍😍😍😍😍
3 Turkic Empire not iran or arab and indian
Safavid was definitely Iranian you fool. Built by Turks, while culturally absolutely Iranian.
@mahadgeedijalawle3538 Ismael's father is Türk and mother is Türk , İsmail grandson is Sultan Uzun Hasan Bayundur
Safavid is Iranian turk not Azergayjan 🇮🇷🦁☀️🫸🏳️🌈🇦🇿💩
@@ehsan-y9z Clap clap dude, your speaking style shows your intelligence. Grow up a little and learn to face reality.
Why does pakistanis keep comparing their stories to ours.
Idot after Babar all of the Mughal rulers called themselves that they are from Subcontinent not from Uzbekistan and many Mughals and Turkic people do live in Pakistan as well although Pakistan history is Indus valley civilization the oldest civilization of the world.
@@theupdated5931 no turks live in pak its only the upper caste converts to islam who claim that they are turks or arabs to raise there social status and indus valley is ofc indian civilisation and has nothing to do with pakistan
Safavid No iran Yes TÜRKİŞ🇦🇿
persian
@@hattorihaso2579 🤣🤣no(YES TÜRKİŞ🇦🇿💪)
@@QIZILBAS-1501 eeuhm it was persian
@@hattorihaso2579 🤣🤣🤣no (YES TÜRKİŞ🇦🇿💪)
@@QIZILBAS-1501 learn how to spell in english you turkish speajing persian