I road tested the Hyundai Tucson, Mazda CX5 and Honda CR-V late in 2019. All were taken over my 25km test route that included speed humps, freeway running, coarse surfaces, tram tracks with rough concrete surfaces, and good quality major roads. Three other SUVs were rejected: Kia Sportage (I bumped my head getting in even with the seat in the lowest position), Mitsubishi Outlander and Nissan X-trail -(both getting left behind in features). The Tucson was good, lots of features with a good ride, but thrashy engine that wasn't particularly responsive. A nice light coloured interior is available. The CX5 was nice and responsive, engine and gearbox combo was good, the interior was nice but very dark, boot space and rear seats a bit cramped, and it also suffered from having a space saver spare (with the dealer quoting an absolutely ridiculous price for a full sized spare). The ride was a little harsh for my poor back, and it really failed on my speed humps (ones I have gone over every working day for the last 12 years). It also failed because of a very pushy salesperson (I hate that!). I bought the Honda CR-V, VTi-S as per this comparison. It has a beautiful cushy ride, a responsive engine which is quiet most of the time, only noisy when really pushed. I don't mind the CVT although I don't find it quite as responsive as the one in the Mitsubishi Lancer I had just traded in. I was expecting slightly better fuel consumption than I am currently getting from the Honda, but to be fair, most of my running is my daily commute of 10km each way. The 2.0 litre Lancer was slightly worse. I found the video and text review to be quite fair and they pretty well agree with my own findings from those test drives I did. The Mazda was good, the Honda was slightly better, especially for my purposes and physical needs (I'm tall and have arthritis in my back). None of those I looked at and/or tested were perfect ... there's probably no such thing.
I am in the market right now to get a new vehicle and these are the two I am considering. I currently have a 2016 Honda HR-V, more of a CUV than an SUV, it also as the cvt transmission and I have never had a problem with it. If you are looking at cars and the cvt is your big concern, don't worry about it.
Screen looks small? You said the Honda has a 7 inch screen, in 2020 the Mazda has a 8 inch screen, if your testing a 2019 then both the cars have the same size screen?? You don't get rear outlets huh?
When I buy a small size SUV, space was never a problem, I want performance, something compact and enjoyable to drive. If I want space, I would get a medium size SUV.
I had the 2017 crv and now have a 2020 cx 5. The cx 5 is the superior vehicle by far. Nothing but trouble with the crv with oil dilution and many other issues.
Yes, we own both too. The cx-5 drives better and it has a more premium interior and we love the speakers. Although we take the crab on road trips because it’s bigger and more practical
My Father has been driving Mazdas since 83. He buys a new one and drives it to 30,000 swedish miles. Then sell it. Buys a new. He has always been very happy with Mazda. Cx5 is very nice car👌
No pwer outlet at the back for mazda?you just open the armrest and its there mate.i owned both car and i tell you the finish quality mazda is the winner.no question about it
all reviews are subjective and based upon individual needs, having said that this review seemed to be leaning towards Honda as if it’s an advertisement for Honda. There are tons of reviews of Toyota vs Honda vs Mazda of the same segment out there that are far more detailed check out this “review” from Throttle House of Toyota Rav 4, Mazda CX-5 and Honda CR-V all 2020 models top trim. th-cam.com/video/goPMlLkn18U/w-d-xo.html
In 2019 CX-5 was the winner but in 2020 CR-V has changed the game altogether. New CR-V comes with better features like wireless charging and larger infotainment system.
I had not watched this review when I independently chose the Honda over the Mazda. Important for me is the full size spare in the Honda, and the good cabin storage design. I also like the way the rear seat can fold up to allow carriage of something like a large pot plant behind the front seats.
I bought the CRV LX after testing both CX5 and the Forester, the Forester is gutless and service costs are very expensive, the CX5 turbo is very powerful but cost significantly more than the CRV and is a lot less spacious which led us to the CRV, which is a wonderful car, comes fully loaded with sunroof leather and everything you can think of, went down to Albany and Bremer Bay and it was a really effortless drive with plenty of power for quick overtakes and very comfortable on bumpy country roads. Went on the dunes in Bremer Bay and it was gliding over them with ease. Overall we`re very happy with the CRV
Test drove a CR-V but was very disappointed with the CVT. Everything except for the transmission was wonderful but I just couldn't get over the CVT. And has anybody noticed that the gear stick makes a weird hollow sound when changing modes or was it the car I drove?
I agree. The CVT is awful. The shifter placement was a deal breaker for us too. It's just odd. I really don't care if someone can put their purse in the storage where the shifter should be. I want the shifter in the correct location, and the Mazda does that right. The gauge cluster is a bit cartoony in the CRV as well.
Yeah, I probably recommend cars that don't have a CVT. As an engineering student myself, I just can't trust the mechanism of how that transmission is structured. I will probably stick to the torque converter automatic. I'm not sure about DCT though.
It kills me that many of these reviews only assume FAMILIES buy SUVs. Single people buy them too! A single person would choose the Mazda. Not everybody needs space for 5. Not only that most families only have 1 or 2 kids. If you need more space then buy a bigger SUV.
Hi Patrick. I would mildly disagree with you about the CVT: I had a Mitsubishi Lancer for 9 years, traded in on the Honda CRV, and while I agree the Honda CVT is good, I found the Miitsubishi one a little more responsive. The Honda one is good at keeping the engine revs lower though (the torque band starts at 2000 rpm). I can't say I like the drone from CVT equipped cars, but when set up properly, they do work very well, and both Honda and Mitsubishi have got their acts together with theirs (in my opinion). I did like having the manual override in the Lancer with six artificially programmed speeds, just to relieve the boredom on occasions, where Honda has a clunkier override with only two settings. Don't get me wrong, I like the CR-V and don't for one minute regret choosing it.
Yes i looked and test drove both the Mazda and Honda And felt that the Honda is a better car so i have purchased the Honda Your findings confirm mine Thank you Steve from N.Z.
Haha, yeah really! When I was on the market for a CUV in 2018, I cross-shopped the CX-5 and the CR-V. The CR-V in many ways is not a direct comparison to the CX-5: the CR-V is bigger and way more expensive partially due to getting a lot of bells and whistles that just felt like a gimmick. I ended up going with the CX-5, it was simple in its design, build, and price.
Nope the Mazda is way quieter and much more solid. And more fun. And classy. And distinct. Who cares if the back seat has slightly less room. CX-5 wins every time .
The Honda is a LOT quieter on in the inside for sure. The Mazda is more fun to drive granted, but if you're buying a car in this class, practicality is a concern, and the CX-5 is just too small on the inside to compete (it's basically worst in class for that - who wants an SUV with an almost unusable back seat and less boot space than some hatchbacks?). Not to mention Mazda's infotainment is almost Nissan bad at this point and in need of a major update. Mazda's pricing is also pretty poor as well. The only real reason not to buy the CR-V is the potential for Honda to back out of the market in Australia. I'd probably pick neither and go with something else. There are plenty of great options in this segment, and with the CX-5 now being overtaken by so many of them, you're spoiled for choice. I ultimately went left field and went for a Kia Cerato GT....more interior space than the CX-5, bigger boot, not to mention a hell of a lot quicker...for 10k less.
B Hill isn’t that the main reason why people are buying these things for more space over a traditional hatchback? If it doesn’t have the space there looking for what’s the point.
Mazda's seem to always be a bit tighter on the inside than it's competitors. Don't know why that is. It's in every model of theirs. However they always seem to drive better and sportier. Here in U.S.A the CRV sold 379K units last year while the Mazda sold only about 150k units. Don't know why that is though. Honda makes their own CVT transmissions and they are one of the best CVT's out there. If i were younger I would go with the Mazda. But that i'm getting older now, I think i would rather have a softer ride at this stage in my life. But i hate those horizontal rear tail lights.
I was debating which of these 2 cars to get and just got a CX 5. Love the car, but admit I wish the backseat had 2-3 more inches of legroom because most of my friends and I are are 6 feet tall and it can get a little tight. I just couldn’t get around to buying a CRV because I genuinely don’t like the way they look. They almost have a mini van eh feeling and I can’t stand those rear taillights. I think the Mazda is one of the most stylish crossovers on the market and gets the job done for my lifestyle
@@taken271 hahaha I guess if you’re a soccer mom or simply don’t care about style, they’re great! They’re a lot more spacious, so if you’re commonly going to have 3, 4, or 5 people in the car it’s probably more practical.
The review was laughable. Reviewers that consistently ‘reward’ manufacturers for going bigger just aren’t doing their jobs. A class of vehicle is based on size and bursting outside that class should be looked down on not glorified. People go out looking for a small or in this case medium sized SUV and that’s what they should get. If the new Tucson is released at the size of a school bus will you glorify it and say the other ‘mid sized’ SUV’s aren’t cutting it anymore? 🤦🏽♂️
I’ve driven both vehicles. The Honda is by far the batter choice. I’ve seen some comments here saying that the quality of the finish is better in the Mazda. Are you kidding!? The Honda is so solid! Wouldn’t waste money on the Mazda.
Simon Edge still driving my 7.5 years old CRV, never had an issue. Great drive, petrol wise, great for family of 4. Thinking about update to a 2021 one soon.
My head prefers the Mazda's aspirated engine matted to the 6 speed torque converter auto but having driven the Honda CR-V 1.5 turbo matted to the CVT, I now agree, the Honda is the better car. However, the CX-5 may be more reliable over time.
I test drove both and honestly, the Mazda CX-5 feels underpowered and the ride feels unsafe. The CRV is much more comfortable, excellent ride and smooth acceleration. And the style, Mazda designers can't think of any other design, they all look the same. The knob control for infotainment, the designer is stuck in the 80s. Cabin storage, my friend kept complaining that he doesn't know where to put his things in the Cx5. Rear space makes u feel claustrophobic. Please stop comparing these two. The only worthy opponent for the CRV is RAV4.
CR-V for me but the only thing I have against it is the 1.5L turbo engine. If Honda left the original 2.4L na engine in the current CR-V it would have been an even bigger winner than it is now.
Let's see, the Honda has an engine plagued with oil dilution problems that will probably cause premature wear and has a CVT that is likely to be unreliable. Apart from that...
Put 135,000 miles on my 2000 Honda CRV, sold it for $1,000 less than I paid for it. Back floor pulls out for strong picnic table and fiberglass ice box! Only repair a clutch bearing!👏👏👏🥰🥰🥰
Depends on how its implemented. Nissan's Jatco CVTs felt crappy and died quickly. Others have done a better job. I've had this CRV for over 3 yrs and it's fine.
Edward Reyez Honda and their attempt to go upscale (North America) uses a multi-gear transmission. They are trying to offer a cheaper people mover. . SUV vs Estate... only difference is height.
We bought the CX5 GT loaded, but non turbo. My Advice, buy the CRV or RAV. Seats are hard and hurt. Ride is rough, steering is too stiff with no real feedback benefit. Space is cramped. Granted the CRV comes with an awful CVT, and the oil dilution issues are real but in Australia you should not see them. RAV 4 hybrid or CRV Hybrid is what we should have gotten. Wife's car so I didn't care. She liked it. I hated the shifter location on the CRV. That Screen on the CRV is really no bigger than the CX5 though. It's mostly blacked out screen.
This guy said no power outlet on the cx5 in the rear Mazda CX-5 touring and the above trim level has all rear power outled Mazda is the winner anyway because cvt is trash
You just lost my interest when you said there’s no power output in the rear seat of the cx5. You even just looked at where it was and then said that it wasn’t there. Rubbish!
I've never understood how Mazda somehow manages to make their cars so cramped on the inside. If you're buying a family car, it's something that gets very tiresome very quick.
Non-CVT, non-Turbo, is the better mechanical choice. Don't have problems like oil dilution and CVT failures. Softer suspension wins when the CX-5 has sublime handling? Seems like a poor comparison review.
Cx5 all the way!! I dont give a fuck how spacious crv is, I love driving cx5 its peppy drive and handles really good more luxurios inside and out its a good looking suv. doesn’t have a cvt trasmission that alone makes the cx5 a winner!! Crv is overrated
Trent be honest and tell me how much Honda paid you to talk in favour of Honda? given that Honda is brutally struggling to survive in Australia. Mate ! Mazda rules in all aspects and Honda can't match it....fact
The CX-5 looks better, and probably handles better, but I think Trent made a pretty clear cut case why the Honda is the superior vehicle - storage and ride - which are so much more important for this segment. Unfair to say Honda are paying him. Honda struggling doesn’t really bear on a comparison between these two cars.
Every review of those mid sized SUV are always funny. People who buy Mazdas aren't even looking at cargo space. Same thing goes around when people looks at hondas, they aren't looking at how it drive. Cvt are the new "minivan" in a boring way. They isolate more the interior so you don't hear that ugly noise. I'm glad mazda aren't so we can hear engine and exhaust sound (mazda still need a axle back to sound good tbh). Ps what going on with the gear selection in the crv? Can they put it any higher?
This review is really a bias because cx5 cabin quality and fit and finish is way ahead than what it is in Crv secondly cx5 is more well insulated than crv on higher speeds and altogether a way more pleasurable to drive cx5 than sluggish crv and especially with that cvt and 1.5 turbo that have aaalot of problems, but definitely crv had a little edge over space but frankly that difference means not at all in the real world
CRV has more storage space than the CX-5. CRV also has better infotainment, faster 0-60 time, more comfortable over bumps, quieter, more leg room, better safety features, etc.
@@CommandoMaster 0-60 - 2020 CR-V 1.5T/Hybrid: 7.5s/7.9s, 2020 CX-5 2.5/2.5T : 8.3s/6.4s. Tested cabin noise - 2020 CR-V Touring : 70db, 2020 CX-5 Signature : 70db. 2020 CR-V scored top safety pick by IIHS, while 2020 CX-5 scored higher at top safety pick plus. I’d still say there are no real winners here as the reviewer suggests. It depends on what features you value the most when cross shopping these two SUVs.
Does this guy have kids as big as him? Why is he in the backseat then? Get a kid and put her in the back. You know you won't be sitting there. Im an adult. I can count on 1 hand how many times ive been in a backseat in the last 15 years. Furthermore when driving around Ive noticed the overwhelming majority of vehicles on the road have 1 occupant in them, the driver.
The Mazda looks really outdated, the CRV is much better looking in design all over. In terms of space and comfort, the CX-5 doesn’t compare to the CRV.
Its easy, if you want a dumpy looking SUV for women with 3 kids then get the Honda. If you are single or have 1 kid buy the Mazda and get a much better looking and sportier vehicle with class.
![ILLSLICK - WINTER IS COMING [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dwTMeM1zIhQ/mqdefault.jpg)
We are a family of 2, would go for Mazda CX-5. Just lovely to drive
Same. Love my CX5 I bought in 2016. No problems so far.
I road tested the Hyundai Tucson, Mazda CX5 and Honda CR-V late in 2019. All were taken over my 25km test route that included speed humps, freeway running, coarse surfaces, tram tracks with rough concrete surfaces, and good quality major roads. Three other SUVs were rejected: Kia Sportage (I bumped my head getting in even with the seat in the lowest position), Mitsubishi Outlander and Nissan X-trail -(both getting left behind in features).
The Tucson was good, lots of features with a good ride, but thrashy engine that wasn't particularly responsive. A nice light coloured interior is available.
The CX5 was nice and responsive, engine and gearbox combo was good, the interior was nice but very dark, boot space and rear seats a bit cramped, and it also suffered from having a space saver spare (with the dealer quoting an absolutely ridiculous price for a full sized spare). The ride was a little harsh for my poor back, and it really failed on my speed humps (ones I have gone over every working day for the last 12 years). It also failed because of a very pushy salesperson (I hate that!).
I bought the Honda CR-V, VTi-S as per this comparison. It has a beautiful cushy ride, a responsive engine which is quiet most of the time, only noisy when really pushed. I don't mind the CVT although I don't find it quite as responsive as the one in the Mitsubishi Lancer I had just traded in. I was expecting slightly better fuel consumption than I am currently getting from the Honda, but to be fair, most of my running is my daily commute of 10km each way. The 2.0 litre Lancer was slightly worse.
I found the video and text review to be quite fair and they pretty well agree with my own findings from those test drives I did. The Mazda was good, the Honda was slightly better, especially for my purposes and physical needs (I'm tall and have arthritis in my back). None of those I looked at and/or tested were perfect ... there's probably no such thing.
No to CR-V's turbo+CVT. Yes to CX-5's NA+auto.
I'd take a NA 2.5L with a 6-speed slushbox over a 1.5L turbo with CVT anyday.
I bought a Mazda CX5 GT on Dec.20.. in a word? Outstanding..The fact that the Honda uses a CVT transmission alone, should ward you off...
I am in the market right now to get a new vehicle and these are the two I am considering. I currently have a 2016 Honda HR-V, more of a CUV than an SUV, it also as the cvt transmission and I have never had a problem with it. If you are looking at cars and the cvt is your big concern, don't worry about it.
Honda looks like every other suv on the market where the cx5 is unique and stands out!
Its the CRV for me, ticks all the right boxes...had a SP25 Mazda3 which was great and so was the number of tickets
Screen looks small? You said the Honda has a 7 inch screen, in 2020 the Mazda has a 8 inch screen, if your testing a 2019 then both the cars have the same size screen?? You don't get rear outlets huh?
When I buy a small size SUV, space was never a problem, I want performance, something compact and enjoyable to drive. If I want space, I would get a medium size SUV.
I had the 2017 crv and now have a 2020 cx 5. The cx 5 is the superior vehicle by far. Nothing but trouble with the crv with oil dilution and many other issues.
I own both. the CRV runs like a sick dog and makes a loud rattling noise on the dashboard. i favored the CX-5 a lot better its more fun to drive.
Yes, we own both too. The cx-5 drives better and it has a more premium interior and we love the speakers. Although we take the crab on road trips because it’s bigger and more practical
Crv not Crab
My Father has been driving Mazdas since 83. He buys a new one and drives it to 30,000 swedish miles. Then sell it. Buys a new. He has always been very happy with Mazda. Cx5 is very nice car👌
What's the difference between Swedish miles and international?
A Swedish "mile" is 10 kilometers ...lots of countries in Europe use the metric system..for example 1 kilo is 1000grams. Cheers
No pwer outlet at the back for mazda?you just open the armrest and its there mate.i owned both car and i tell you the finish quality mazda is the winner.no question about it
is the back seat area big enough for a rear-facing child seat?
Was about to say the same thing! i have the 18 model and it even has power in the back ? whats this guy on about
all reviews are subjective and based upon individual needs, having said that this review seemed to be leaning towards Honda as if it’s an advertisement for Honda. There are tons of reviews of Toyota vs Honda vs Mazda of the same segment out there that are far more detailed check out this “review” from Throttle House of Toyota Rav 4, Mazda CX-5 and Honda CR-V all 2020 models top trim.
th-cam.com/video/goPMlLkn18U/w-d-xo.html
Yeah. He didnt even tried to open the small latch beside the cup holder which houses the 2 usb ports lol
Mazda CX-5. Need I say anymore?
In 2019 CX-5 was the winner but in 2020 CR-V has changed the game altogether. New CR-V comes with better features like wireless charging and larger infotainment system.
I had not watched this review when I independently chose the Honda over the Mazda. Important for me is the full size spare in the Honda, and the good cabin storage design. I also like the way the rear seat can fold up to allow carriage of something like a large pot plant behind the front seats.
I bought the CRV LX after testing both CX5 and the Forester, the Forester is gutless and service costs are very expensive, the CX5 turbo is very powerful but cost significantly more than the CRV and is a lot less spacious which led us to the CRV, which is a wonderful car, comes fully loaded with sunroof leather and everything you can think of, went down to Albany and Bremer Bay and it was a really effortless drive with plenty of power for quick overtakes and very comfortable on bumpy country roads. Went on the dunes in Bremer Bay and it was gliding over them with ease. Overall we`re very happy with the CRV
Iggy nor you pay more cuz there is more...cx5
Test drove a CR-V but was very disappointed with the CVT. Everything except for the transmission was wonderful but I just couldn't get over the CVT. And has anybody noticed that the gear stick makes a weird hollow sound when changing modes or was it the car I drove?
Raunak Mehta CVT is rubbish in any modern car sadly
I agree. The CVT is awful. The shifter placement was a deal breaker for us too. It's just odd. I really don't care if someone can put their purse in the storage where the shifter should be. I want the shifter in the correct location, and the Mazda does that right. The gauge cluster is a bit cartoony in the CRV as well.
Yeah, I probably recommend cars that don't have a CVT. As an engineering student myself, I just can't trust the mechanism of how that transmission is structured. I will probably stick to the torque converter automatic. I'm not sure about DCT though.
I'd probably pick the CX-5. But I understand why the CR-V is the winner in terms of family SUV choice.
It kills me that many of these reviews only assume FAMILIES buy SUVs. Single people buy them too! A single person would choose the Mazda. Not everybody needs space for 5. Not only that most families only have 1 or 2 kids. If you need more space then buy a bigger SUV.
Exactly
I am a huge mazda fan but i can say no manufactor make better cvt than honda
I would consider the crv as my next choice for sure
Hi Patrick. I would mildly disagree with you about the CVT: I had a Mitsubishi Lancer for 9 years, traded in on the Honda CRV, and while I agree the Honda CVT is good, I found the Miitsubishi one a little more responsive. The Honda one is good at keeping the engine revs lower though (the torque band starts at 2000 rpm).
I can't say I like the drone from CVT equipped cars, but when set up properly, they do work very well, and both Honda and Mitsubishi have got their acts together with theirs (in my opinion). I did like having the manual override in the Lancer with six artificially programmed speeds, just to relieve the boredom on occasions, where Honda has a clunkier override with only two settings.
Don't get me wrong, I like the CR-V and don't for one minute regret choosing it.
Nope... sorry mate, just got my cx5 and I’m loving it.
Yes i looked and test drove both the Mazda and Honda
And felt that the Honda is a better car so i have purchased the Honda
Your findings confirm mine
Thank you
Steve from N.Z.
Hope it goes well for you Steve!
I just bought Mazda CX-5 Touring Diesel 2021, i can tell you the screen bigger than that model in the video, love it 👍
When he can't even find Mazda's USB is where his credibility was lost.
Haha, yeah really! When I was on the market for a CUV in 2018, I cross-shopped the CX-5 and the CR-V. The CR-V in many ways is not a direct comparison to the CX-5: the CR-V is bigger and way more expensive partially due to getting a lot of bells and whistles that just felt like a gimmick. I ended up going with the CX-5, it was simple in its design, build, and price.
Lol yeah. He said didn't have any in the back, so obviously didn't left the middle flap where there's two of them. What a lazy comparison
CX-5
Nope the Mazda is way quieter and much more solid. And more fun. And classy. And distinct. Who cares if the back seat has slightly less room. CX-5 wins every time .
The Honda is a LOT quieter on in the inside for sure. The Mazda is more fun to drive granted, but if you're buying a car in this class, practicality is a concern, and the CX-5 is just too small on the inside to compete (it's basically worst in class for that - who wants an SUV with an almost unusable back seat and less boot space than some hatchbacks?). Not to mention Mazda's infotainment is almost Nissan bad at this point and in need of a major update. Mazda's pricing is also pretty poor as well. The only real reason not to buy the CR-V is the potential for Honda to back out of the market in Australia. I'd probably pick neither and go with something else. There are plenty of great options in this segment, and with the CX-5 now being overtaken by so many of them, you're spoiled for choice.
I ultimately went left field and went for a Kia Cerato GT....more interior space than the CX-5, bigger boot, not to mention a hell of a lot quicker...for 10k less.
B Hill isn’t that the main reason why people are buying these things for more space over a traditional hatchback? If it doesn’t have the space there looking for what’s the point.
They certainly didn't win US sales though
I like the looks of the Mazder better than the Honder.
By the look.i prefer honda but i really concern how long that 1.5l engine last to pull that heavy body.
Mazda's seem to always be a bit tighter on the inside than it's competitors. Don't know why that is. It's in every model of theirs. However they always seem to drive better and sportier. Here in U.S.A the CRV sold 379K units last year while the Mazda sold only about 150k units. Don't know why that is though. Honda makes their own CVT transmissions and they are one of the best CVT's out there. If i were younger I would go with the Mazda. But that i'm getting older now, I think i would rather have a softer ride at this stage in my life. But i hate those horizontal rear tail lights.
I was debating which of these 2 cars to get and just got a CX 5. Love the car, but admit I wish the backseat had 2-3 more inches of legroom because most of my friends and I are are 6 feet tall and it can get a little tight. I just couldn’t get around to buying a CRV because I genuinely don’t like the way they look. They almost have a mini van eh feeling and I can’t stand those rear taillights. I think the Mazda is one of the most stylish crossovers on the market and gets the job done for my lifestyle
I get the same mini van feeling from the crv, it's really off-putting.
@@taken271 hahaha I guess if you’re a soccer mom or simply don’t care about style, they’re great! They’re a lot more spacious, so if you’re commonly going to have 3, 4, or 5 people in the car it’s probably more practical.
I wouldn't touch a honda if they are thinking about leaving Australia.
N .A You have made a great point.
They R not leaving as i c
The review was laughable. Reviewers that consistently ‘reward’ manufacturers for going bigger just aren’t doing their jobs. A class of vehicle is based on size and bursting outside that class should be looked down on not glorified. People go out looking for a small or in this case medium sized SUV and that’s what they should get. If the new Tucson is released at the size of a school bus will you glorify it and say the other ‘mid sized’ SUV’s aren’t cutting it anymore? 🤦🏽♂️
Does crv still suffer from oil dilution?
no
Same engine so possibly but you can get the Hybrid version and not have to think about it .
I’ve driven both vehicles. The Honda is by far the batter choice. I’ve seen some comments here saying that the quality of the finish is better in the Mazda. Are you kidding!? The Honda is so solid! Wouldn’t waste money on the Mazda.
Simon Edge still driving my 7.5 years old CRV, never had an issue. Great drive, petrol wise, great for family of 4. Thinking about update to a 2021 one soon.
CVT trans has too many ifs still... the rear seat issue is not an issue as a family vehicle as the kids sit there.... everything else ... CX5
U R right and it's no surprise that Honda didn't place any cars on the Consumer Reports 2020 top 10 while Mazda placed 3 cars there. CVTs = problems
is this video sponsored by honda?
Cx5 is the winner. More power, more fun to drive. Luxury inside and outside.better quality.👎
You nailed it on the CX-5 rear seat, it's like a subcompact class SUV (CX-3) and not a mid-sized.
My head prefers the Mazda's aspirated engine matted to the 6 speed torque converter auto but having driven the Honda CR-V 1.5 turbo matted to the CVT, I now agree, the Honda is the better car. However, the CX-5 may be more reliable over time.
Cx5 signature
Honda better in every single way, driven both cars. Thoughtful design, space storage. Excellent brakes and suspension. Brilliant 1.5 turbo engine.
CVTs don't reward the driver. Could you clarify what that means? It's sounds like an automatic though.
Which one is more Quiet cabin?
And which on more fun to drive?
I test drove both and honestly, the Mazda CX-5 feels underpowered and the ride feels unsafe. The CRV is much more comfortable, excellent ride and smooth acceleration. And the style, Mazda designers can't think of any other design, they all look the same. The knob control for infotainment, the designer is stuck in the 80s. Cabin storage, my friend kept complaining that he doesn't know where to put his things in the Cx5. Rear space makes u feel claustrophobic. Please stop comparing these two. The only worthy opponent for the CRV is RAV4.
CR-V for me but the only thing I have against it is the 1.5L turbo engine. If Honda left the original 2.4L na engine in the current CR-V it would have been an even bigger winner than it is now.
My CX5's trunk is 500 litres, why here 422?
Let's see, the Honda has an engine plagued with oil dilution problems that will probably cause premature wear and has a CVT that is likely to be unreliable. Apart from that...
Thanks god! We just bought Honda CRV, thank you!
I love my 2021 CRV , its my first SUV ever , but i need to change the oem tire Hankook ! Because its noisy in harsh street ,
Put 135,000 miles on my 2000 Honda CRV, sold it for $1,000 less than I paid for it. Back floor pulls
out for strong picnic table and fiberglass ice box!
Only repair a clutch bearing!👏👏👏🥰🥰🥰
Everyone hates CVT, but when honda used CVT in their cars, they love it.. alot of car buyer are just looking at brand..
Depends on how its implemented. Nissan's Jatco CVTs felt crappy and died quickly. Others have done a better job. I've had this CRV for over 3 yrs and it's fine.
Edward Reyez Honda and their attempt to go upscale (North America) uses a multi-gear transmission. They are trying to offer a cheaper people mover. . SUV vs Estate... only difference is height.
Seems like just a positive plug for the CRV.
Mazda will always beat back the Honda in drivability and no CVT ughhh
I take cx5...more fun to drive
Thanks for the feedback!
your iphone has a 8-inch screen？
the honda crv is cheaper materials . the cx-5 mazda is good look and big engine with bose speaker nice quality outside & inside & strong engine100%
I’ll pick mazda cx5 all the way I love driving and cx5 is way beautiful than the crv!
Almost everyone I know who has a CX5 needed the motor replaced...
Honda 1.5 turbo 80 km/h= 5,2 l/100km 😄🇵🇱 Pozdrawiam .
Cx 5 is best
Apparently old money buys CRV, imo
We bought the CX5 GT loaded, but non turbo. My Advice, buy the CRV or RAV. Seats are hard and hurt. Ride is rough, steering is too stiff with no real feedback benefit. Space is cramped. Granted the CRV comes with an awful CVT, and the oil dilution issues are real but in Australia you should not see them. RAV 4 hybrid or CRV Hybrid is what we should have gotten. Wife's car so I didn't care. She liked it. I hated the shifter location on the CRV. That Screen on the CRV is really no bigger than the CX5 though. It's mostly blacked out screen.
Great feedback! Sorry your CX-5 experience wasn't great.
Yeah I thought I heard him say the're both 7 inches.
kilowatts. Newton meters. Liters. It's tonight being American and having no earthly idea the conversion figures for these
This guy said no power outlet on the cx5 in the rear Mazda CX-5 touring and the above trim level has all rear power outled Mazda is the winner anyway because cvt is trash
You just lost my interest when you said there’s no power output in the rear seat of the cx5.
You even just looked at where it was and then said that it wasn’t there.
Rubbish!
Proud owner of HONDA CRV 2019
Thanks for the feedback!
10:45 yes
I've never understood how Mazda somehow manages to make their cars so cramped on the inside. If you're buying a family car, it's something that gets very tiresome very quick.
Mazda all look the same simple
Style. No digital speedometer. Just all analog old style. Crv has lots of space and comfy. Thats why i bought crv.
Non-CVT, non-Turbo, is the better mechanical choice. Don't have problems like oil dilution and CVT failures. Softer suspension wins when the CX-5 has sublime handling? Seems like a poor comparison review.
Cx5 all the way!! I dont give a fuck how spacious crv is, I love driving cx5 its peppy drive and handles really good more luxurios inside and out its a good looking suv. doesn’t have a cvt trasmission that alone makes the cx5 a winner!! Crv is overrated
I bought the cx5 no brainer .. overall the better car.
Trent be honest and tell me how much Honda paid you to talk in favour of Honda? given that Honda is brutally struggling to survive in Australia. Mate ! Mazda rules in all aspects and Honda can't match it....fact
The CX-5 looks better, and probably handles better, but I think Trent made a pretty clear cut case why the Honda is the superior vehicle - storage and ride - which are so much more important for this segment. Unfair to say Honda are paying him. Honda struggling doesn’t really bear on a comparison between these two cars.
Every review of those mid sized SUV are always funny. People who buy Mazdas aren't even looking at cargo space. Same thing goes around when people looks at hondas, they aren't looking at how it drive. Cvt are the new "minivan" in a boring way. They isolate more the interior so you don't hear that ugly noise. I'm glad mazda aren't so we can hear engine and exhaust sound (mazda still need a axle back to sound good tbh).
Ps what going on with the gear selection in the crv? Can they put it any higher?
No way, i will go for Mazda CX5
Thanks for the feedback!
This review is really a bias because cx5 cabin quality and fit and finish is way ahead than what it is in Crv secondly cx5 is more well insulated than crv on higher speeds and altogether a way more pleasurable to drive cx5 than sluggish crv and especially with that cvt and 1.5 turbo that have aaalot of problems, but definitely crv had a little edge over space but frankly that difference means not at all in the real world
crv engine is loud and grindy
Honda anytime. I will feel suffocated inside the CX5. Am not a high speed and hurry driver anyway.
Bit biased towards Honda for some reason
CRV has more storage space than the CX-5. CRV also has better infotainment, faster 0-60 time, more comfortable over bumps, quieter, more leg room, better safety features, etc.
@@CommandoMaster 0-60 - 2020 CR-V 1.5T/Hybrid: 7.5s/7.9s, 2020 CX-5 2.5/2.5T : 8.3s/6.4s. Tested cabin noise - 2020 CR-V Touring : 70db, 2020 CX-5 Signature : 70db. 2020 CR-V scored top safety pick by IIHS, while 2020 CX-5 scored higher at top safety pick plus. I’d still say there are no real winners here as the reviewer suggests. It depends on what features you value the most when cross shopping these two SUVs.
Yes i agree , I would buy the CRV
I like CR-V, it's a really good car to drive
Love honda but jessus....1.5l engine.
This guy think the Honda cabin is nicer than the Mazda???? What? I get the screen is smaller but that’s the only thing worse in the front of the car.
It's a subiectiv test from begining to the end : wrong
Does this guy have kids as big as him? Why is he in the backseat then? Get a kid and put her in the back. You know you won't be sitting there. Im an adult. I can count on 1 hand how many times ive been in a backseat in the last 15 years. Furthermore when driving around Ive noticed the overwhelming majority of vehicles on the road have 1 occupant in them, the driver.
Cvt, oil dilution issue with 1.5 turbo. No thanks Honda
Great transmission, reliable NA engine. Yes Mazda
What about the NA option the engine can come in? Oil solution problem still?
CR-V 🏆
Old specs on CX5 🤔
dont even know why cx5 is compared with crv and rav4. its so small and interior space is nonexistence
CRV BEATS Mazda or 4RV in a Hart beat by space look and ride.
Walter 777 Smith correction, just space
SIR, THE STEERING WHEEL IS ON THE WRONG SIDE
crv 3k cheaper than the cx5 so honda gets that one
Okay
Had the Honda. Got rid of it one year later! Wouldn't buy a Honda again, not the same brand as it used to be, so many faults and poorly built
Indeed
Someone to gift me with a mazda Cx5.
The Mazda looks really outdated, the CRV is much better looking in design all over. In terms of space and comfort, the CX-5 doesn’t compare to the CRV.
U dont know what beautiful is. Sorry u have a bad taste! cx5 is way more luxurios looking beautiful inside and out.
Great review
Its easy, if you want a dumpy looking SUV for women with 3 kids then get the Honda. If you are single or have 1 kid buy the Mazda and get a much better looking and sportier vehicle with class.
Unbiased test,great review as usual. Thumbs up Trent!