MW has a great place in my heart. As an 80's car lovin' child in Mexico City it was the only related program I could see because I was fortunate enough to have cable tv in those days. I really love the retro reviews also, and watch every new video they put out.
I loved my 99 Tahoe. White with tan painted bottom and tan leather seats. Rode very smooth and never gave me any issues. Best truck I've owned. Wish they still made them like that.
I love the Motorweek way of reviewing cars. They are straight, highlighting the important features very objective and also introduce the cars in a very professional way. Congratulations John Davis! You and your crew are the best! I loved the new Suburban/Tahoe.
My 99 tahoe 4x4 tahoe with pretty much mid level trim" pretty much cd player and rear air was the only mentionable added options i could find other than Z71 package", was around 33k according to the window sticker. Adjusted for inflation that's right under 50 k today. So over 20 years it hasn't gone too far up in price surprisingly. Still seems like a lot of money though.
Chevy wants to be taken seriously. They need to emulate super cars if they want the Corvette to be a super car. Which is what the Corvette has been trying to do since day one. Like if Honda wants to be taken seriously in the large SUV/full size truck segment.. they have to offer F/R body on frame designs like Toyota does.
@@Bartonovich52 if Chevy wanted to be taken seriously they could start by not ripping off the Corvette's balls and turning it into a bargain-basement Ferrari
That 7.1sec to 60 has gotta be the slowest times I've ever seen from an L87 V8. The old Tahoe RST ran to 60 in 5.7secs, and the old Escalade in 5.9secs. This Tahoe weighs nearly the same as the old model, despite being larger. Was it super hot out, MW? Something just seems off. Also of note, premium fuel is "recommended", not required. It is best used in towing and for max performance. Otherwise, great review Motorweek. As John said, it is "FULL FRAMED AND UNASHAMED"!!😊
I'm sure it would still be outperformed by today's v6 turbos (emissions, mpg, etc). I'm certain this comment by you wasn't the first time they thought of this.
Motor has been a part of my life since it started, except for a few years I was in Spain, Sicily and when I was out to sea. I always look forward to seeing the next episode. I used to get 12 car magazines, but none of them compared with Motorweek.
96+ was at least ODBII. The vortec engines have reliability issues with fuel system. The 2000+ are better mechanically but the interiors are crap. Put an LS in a 96-98 3/4 ton suburban or a Tahoe and you’ve got the perfect family hauler.
The interior materials are definitly better than last year but still mediocre for the price. A co worker of mine just got a 2021 tahoe and the panel gaps are pretty un sightly at that price tag not to mention it underwhelms in performance dept also.....
Since when does a huge SUV need performance? I mean this is not meant to go 0-60in under 6 seconds (that is typically a quick vehicle). And a first year will have issues. I will agree that the price is silly. I would wait a yr or 2 and buy used then
Reviewers generally test the nicest/highest trim level offered to give a fair review. It's been that way for a long time now... but you can still find reviews online (mostly amateurs) with the 5.3 motor...
The Tech Librarian I get sticker shock looking at the prices of new full size suvs. They’re really counting on 72 month financing for most families it seems?
The problem with the Land Cruiser is that it's the forgotten step child of Lexus at this point. And they do it intentionally. Oh, you want that option??? You'll need to come over here and pay at least 25% more for the same basic vehicle with a whole lot of stuff you probably didn't want just to get one item you wanted.
Unless you're offroading constantly, the Tahoe is the better daily ride. Though nobody can discount the Land Cruiser's chops in reliability and resale, but there too, the GM triplets hold their own(especially the GMC Denali).
This thing is so ugly. No getting used to this. The last gen was stunning when it came out. I couldn’t imaging it being eye candy for anyone looking for an SUV.
You don't buy a full size SUV for eye candy. That would be a sports car, you buys these for function. I don't think it's bad looking especially in the more blacked out RST trim.
0:45 I don’t know but being able to see “through” the rear suspension from behind just looks weird to me. I wonder how heavy duty it really is. Those control arms look pretty thin.
Looks like the aftermath of the Ford Excursion, from like some 20 years ago, coming back to the SUVs, that are the few, that are on the truck based platform.
Bought a 2019 with 16K just last month, but saw the new 2021's on the lot and the 2021 has a LOT MORE ROOM on the inside compared to the last body style. I just couldn't see paying $20K more for that room however...
So glad you mentioned the disproportional roof structure above the front doors. Way too short compared to the rest of the roof. From the top of the windshield to the B pillar is just odd looking. I thought I was the only one and you're the only other person who has noticed this. Why hasn't anyone else noticed this or said anything? Just terrible looking.
I test drove the Tahoe LT at 60k msrp and it's nice ride actually. Don't look at the high country too much money. I personally like the design and interior ...way bigger than previous generations.
Get a Honda Odyssey or Toyota Sienna. This thing is a dinosaur even when brand new. It handles like the Titanic, has the fit and finish of typical of GM products.
I'm willing to bet more body-on-frames would sell if they cost less than they do. Plenty of GM's full-size SUVs make it out into the market in spite of their prices, so imagine it if these things were reasonably stickered. Sure, there's bound to be lots of people who will just like the crossover formula better, but if there were more, and more reasonably priced body-on-frames out there, it might surprise us how many more people like 'em that way.
I noticed that you're not showing the braking from 60-0 anymore (at least on screen). Have you guys stopped performing that for the road tests? If so, could you explain why? Thank you.
The Chevrolet Tahoe and Suburban, the GMC Yukon and Yukon XL, and the Cadillac Escalade account for 50% of all large SUV sales in the US. GM makes 340,000 of them every year and exports about 80,000 to 31 countries. They’re made in GM’s plant in Arlington, Texas, which is said to be the most profitable assembly plant in the world. We estimate they generate $20 billion in revenue for GM and about $4 billion in profits. Autoline Daily.
I agree. They made them longer to add room to their third row... but I say, why do these need a third row?? Suburban and Yukon XL have plenty of third row room. I love my 2020 yukon because I can fit it into my garage, you can't do that with the newest model.
People who own these want room but also the ability to tow serious weight... large campers, boats, etc. Those who have these extras in life can generally afford to pay for a Tahoe/Yukon. If the price looks too high to you, GM isn't catering to you in the first place. And I'm not saying that to be snobby it's just the truth.
@@CoryMatthew87 I’m already figured out. I live on my own and have no car payment again. I buy my own food and pay my bills. I don’t need you to tell me what I am. 😂 have a good day sir.
@@vegasbab.y3740 that's exactly what a 20 year old would say. Too funny! Come back in 10-12 years and re-read your comments. You'll be laughing at yourself. Have a good evening.... :)
It doesn't look too bad, but the previous model looked a lot better. The gauges they went 10 steps backwards on, incredibly boring looking. The L87 6.2 is GM's first truck V8 that requires premium now apparently. Also this thing literally has no launch. I think I'll stick to a GMT800.
Okay, I'm confused. How the hell did you manage the 0 to 60 time @ 7.1 seconds with the 420 horsepower motor?? That model is generally clocked at late 5-second range on its 0 to 60 runs. Unless you got a model with something wrong with the transmission, I think somebody either flubbed something, or you must've tested the 5.3L.
6.2 is the only option for high country trim. High 5 seconds is not very realistic though and 7 seconds is a lot more realistic and I would say even good. The f150 raptor barely breaks 6 seconds and it has more power and torque, a sport suspension, aggressive gear ratios, and is considerably lighter.
Sales dont lie though. Tahoes have sold well since their debute in 95, the LandCruiser on the other hand is getting discontinued in the US due to years of poor sales. If they brought a base LC that was equivalent to an LS trim tahoe and didnt have adjustable suspension theyd probably sell much better
over the next few years id like to see. If chevy owners stick around. Premium fuel for your domestic suv! Lexus, acura, nissan, etc i can see but a Tahoe!!
The 6.2L is the only engine that recommends 93 octane. The 5.3L which is very strong will run on regular 87. If you haven't been in a Tahoe in awhile you'd be suprised they are luxury vehicles
There's some serious gas spenders out there.Saw someone at a gasl station with a newer Surburban.Wouldve gave anything to see how it cost to fill that monster up!
I live in ground zero for these rigs Dallas Texas and I see tons of these GM trucks all over the metro here VS POS V6 turbo EXPEDITIONingandNAVIGATORingforarecall Furd POS.
Carrington Hollister Have fun with those piece of shit cars and all those recalls I know a few people who work at a Ford dealer who would never drive one. One guy in parts dept ended up buying a new Tahoe. Now that was fucking hilarious
Faster than ever 👍🏾 yes But they are nothing but a very expensive bunch of plastic that can easily get damage Not like the ones you used to advertise in the 80s 👀Remember 👴 old man????
Let's say I have $70K for a car. I'd better buy 1999 K1500 Suburban LT for $5K. Spend another let's say $30K on restoring it and I'll have a ready-for-everything Suburban for the rest of my life. Simple and very reliable truck. I'd never buy this one. GM spoiled it really bad. Same with Silverado and Tahoe. $70K... In 5 years they'll lose about $25K for nothing. Not to mention new ones are mechanic's attention demanding. Now they require premium gas. Premium gas - 2022 really??? MPG is still not great. For over 22 years they just go only 2-3 miles further on one gallon - so much for improvements. Manufacturers just wanna pull more money out you pockets.
I hate the new Tahoe and Suburban’s styling. The rear end now looks like a Ford Expedition, all flat assed and the stupid chrome strip across the tailgate looks terrible. GM’s infotainment is horrible too, and the analog gauges look like they belong in 2005. The center stack just looks so cheap. For the kind of money one of these things costs, I would be going for an Audi Q7, BMW X5 or X7, or Mercedes-Benz GLE/GLS. At least all of those vehicles actually look decent outside, have more efficient and powerful engine options and don’t look like they share their interior parts with a $29,000 base model Chevy Silverado 1500 work truck.
That machine is a piece of shoe until it has been out in the market for few years and the independent technicians have had time to take it apart and show the world that is still a bipped out product or not Billionaire dillweeds that own the damn company who cash out what little bit of quality it originally had.
“Full framed and unashamed”-me at the beach 😂
You win comment of the DAY!!👌🤣👍
😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂
Yessssssss!
Haha
MW has a great place in my heart. As an 80's car lovin' child in Mexico City it was the only related program I could see because I was fortunate enough to have cable tv in those days. I really love the retro reviews also, and watch every new video they put out.
My favorite Tahoe are the late 90’s ones.
tried and true 350ci
@@MrTaxiRob what size motor they have now
Same
Especially the 2 door
@@LamontBoucherville 2 door tahoes are beautiful.
I LOVE MOTORWEEK!!!
I think MotorWeek is going down the tubes
Give John respect, he’s still a great host and narrator for the road and comparison tests from this to the Corvette
Been watching it since I was a kid.
I loved my 99 Tahoe. White with tan painted bottom and tan leather seats. Rode very smooth and never gave me any issues. Best truck I've owned. Wish they still made them like that.
I love the Motorweek way of reviewing cars.
They are straight, highlighting the important features very objective and also introduce the cars in a very professional way.
Congratulations John Davis! You and your crew are the best!
I loved the new Suburban/Tahoe.
My 99 tahoe 4x4 tahoe with pretty much mid level trim" pretty much cd player and rear air was the only mentionable added options i could find other than Z71 package", was around 33k according to the window sticker. Adjusted for inflation that's right under 50 k today. So over 20 years it hasn't gone too far up in price surprisingly. Still seems like a lot of money though.
Loving motorweek for 40yrs!!!
This is the one product Chevrolet gets right consistently
They can’t afford to screw up the Tahoe/Suburban
@@YouArentSlick but they certainly can afford to screw up the Corvette by turning it into a cheap copy of a McLaren
Chevy wants to be taken seriously. They need to emulate super cars if they want the Corvette to be a super car. Which is what the Corvette has been trying to do since day one.
Like if Honda wants to be taken seriously in the large SUV/full size truck segment.. they have to offer F/R body on frame designs like Toyota does.
@@Bartonovich52 if Chevy wanted to be taken seriously they could start by not ripping off the Corvette's balls and turning it into a bargain-basement Ferrari
They have to. Otherwise they wouldn't be selling anything.
That 7.1sec to 60 has gotta be the slowest times I've ever seen from an L87 V8. The old Tahoe RST ran to 60 in 5.7secs, and the old Escalade in 5.9secs. This Tahoe weighs nearly the same as the old model, despite being larger. Was it super hot out, MW? Something just seems off. Also of note, premium fuel is "recommended", not required. It is best used in towing and for max performance. Otherwise, great review Motorweek. As John said, it is "FULL FRAMED AND UNASHAMED"!!😊
Allways found moterweeks 0-60 times slower then everyone else.
Being large and tall means less air dynamics. That’s why it’s slow.
Imagine if gm bought back the 454 and made a 2021 suburban SS 454 modernized
That would be too cool to make for GM lol
I'm sure it would still be outperformed by today's v6 turbos (emissions, mpg, etc). I'm certain this comment by you wasn't the first time they thought of this.
I'd be cool to see a LS7 7.0L 427cid or the 8.1L 496cid
Motor has been a part of my life since it started, except for a few years I was in Spain, Sicily and when I was out to sea. I always look forward to seeing the next episode. I used to get 12 car magazines, but none of them compared with Motorweek.
The 1995 tahoe should show up in the retro review!!
We would have but we already uploaded it a few years ago! Here's the link for those who haven't seen it yet: th-cam.com/video/MgGrAxGHcUc/w-d-xo.html
@@Motorweek thanks for the reply, I'll watch it now. It's fun to see the changes that have come through the years
I'll take old school Tahoe over the new one any day
I feel you but I love my 22 I have a 99,2007 and my 22 I just love tahoes
I’d take a brand new 1995 Tahoe right now over this and I know I’m not the only one.
TCL have fun with recalls
I like the burb more then the hoe and I cant stop with them
96+ was at least ODBII. The vortec engines have reliability issues with fuel system. The 2000+ are better mechanically but the interiors are crap. Put an LS in a 96-98 3/4 ton suburban or a Tahoe and you’ve got the perfect family hauler.
It makes me happy to see the 75/80 dragway still in use. Those times are disappointing for the 6.2, should be quicker then that!
I use to love going to that track
That's because it is quicker than that.
I think sometimes their test drivers don’t really push them that hard in the 0-60.
It has a the shifter buttons as well as the other vehicles including the 58 fury, Savoy and the 57 belvedare.
I prefer the styling of the previous generation Chevy Tahoe which ran from 2015-2020
The interior materials are definitly better than last year but still mediocre for the price. A co worker of mine just got a 2021 tahoe and the panel gaps are pretty un sightly at that price tag not to mention it underwhelms in performance dept also.....
Since when does a huge SUV need performance? I mean this is not meant to go 0-60in under 6 seconds (that is typically a quick vehicle).
And a first year will have issues.
I will agree that the price is silly. I would wait a yr or 2 and buy used then
Still scratching my head on why you would test a 2021 Tahoe with the 6.2 vs the more common 5.3 v8.
Steve Makowski guessing they test whatever model they’re offered. This just happened to be the one Chevy gave them.
Reviewers generally test the nicest/highest trim level offered to give a fair review. It's been that way for a long time now... but you can still find reviews online (mostly amateurs) with the 5.3 motor...
This thing cost as much as a Land cruiser I guess there's one to buy and one to lease
The Tech Librarian I get sticker shock looking at the prices of new full size suvs. They’re really counting on 72 month financing for most families it seems?
The problem with the Land Cruiser is that it's the forgotten step child of Lexus at this point. And they do it intentionally. Oh, you want that option??? You'll need to come over here and pay at least 25% more for the same basic vehicle with a whole lot of stuff you probably didn't want just to get one item you wanted.
Tahoe’s are pretty reliable
Unless you're offroading constantly, the Tahoe is the better daily ride. Though nobody can discount the Land Cruiser's chops in reliability and resale, but there too, the GM triplets hold their own(especially the GMC Denali).
HellKitty 101 yeah the land cruisers resale is absolutely nuts. I mean we are talking 300k 10 years old still going for 20k
This thing is so ugly. No getting used to this. The last gen was stunning when it came out. I couldn’t imaging it being eye candy for anyone looking for an SUV.
A lot of people can disagree
@@coleprell6280
That’s okay let them buy it I’ll keep my Town Car
They are all ugly. Every one of them.
It’s function over form. If you want style, buy a car.
@@Bartonovich52 I totally agree, I only buy sedans. It’s what I like
You don't buy a full size SUV for eye candy. That would be a sports car, you buys these for function. I don't think it's bad looking especially in the more blacked out RST trim.
is the suburban still your favorite hauler?
0:45 I don’t know but being able to see “through” the rear suspension from behind just looks weird to me. I wonder how heavy duty it really is. Those control arms look pretty thin.
My dad is having a fully loaded '22 tahoe being built!
The undercarriage from the rear is very untidy! All the mechanical stuff under there is visible, not cool!
Its a suv and a truck platform what else did you expect?
@@BIGGIEDEVIL I expected it to be tidy like the Foreign whips!!
I agree, it’s an awkward suv.
Typical GM. Plus, their usual, heavy handed styling. Those wheels look outdated already.
You can see the rear suspension on most trucks and actual non-car based SUVs, so your point is?
1:05 glad to see for the price you still get panel gap issues
Chevrolet needs to bring back the K5 Blazer
Looks like the aftermath of the Ford Excursion, from like some 20 years ago, coming back to the SUVs, that are the few, that are on the truck based platform.
Bought a 2019 with 16K just last month, but saw the new 2021's on the lot and the 2021 has a LOT MORE ROOM on the inside compared to the last body style. I just couldn't see paying $20K more for that room however...
The front ends of these new GM truck look bulbous and blocky....the rake of the windshield doesn't help either.
chevy yea. gmc has a way more attractive front end
So glad you mentioned the disproportional roof structure above the front doors. Way too short compared to the rest of the roof. From the top of the windshield to the B pillar is just odd looking. I thought I was the only one and you're the only other person who has noticed this. Why hasn't anyone else noticed this or said anything? Just terrible looking.
I prefer the 5.3l better for their reliability and maintenance costs
I test drove the Tahoe LT at 60k msrp and it's nice ride actually. Don't look at the high country too much money. I personally like the design and interior ...way bigger than previous generations.
The High Country is GM's version of a Denali for GMC.
So beautiful! Can't be beat!
'05 Tahoe 5.3 Z71 is my favorite
Get a Honda Odyssey or Toyota Sienna.
This thing is a dinosaur even when brand new. It handles like the Titanic, has the fit and finish of typical of GM products.
You lost any credibility on trashing a Tahoe when recommending minivans.....have you even driven the 2021 redesign?
@@iggy-pg6gq oh yeah. It's a full size pickup truck with 4 seats.
Isn't that 10 speed automatic transmission the one that they codeveloped with Ford?
nice suv
Salute from Poland
Salute from the USA
Coming soon to an airport Uber pickup near you...
What Uber driver can afford a $70k SUV?
rgrndu How should I know? All I know is every time I am in the US, and I order an Uber Black, it is inevitably a Tahoe/Suburban/Escalade
@@pullformore Im guessing its not brand new though
Looks like an airliner, interior that is
@@pullformore never had an Uber driving such an expensive vehicle. They are usually in small cars or generic crossover SUVs. lol..
I'm willing to bet more body-on-frames would sell if they cost less than they do. Plenty of GM's full-size SUVs make it out into the market in spite of their prices, so imagine it if these things were reasonably stickered. Sure, there's bound to be lots of people who will just like the crossover formula better, but if there were more, and more reasonably priced body-on-frames out there, it might surprise us how many more people like 'em that way.
I noticed that you're not showing the braking from 60-0 anymore (at least on screen). Have you guys stopped performing that for the road tests? If so, could you explain why? Thank you.
The Chevrolet Tahoe and Suburban, the GMC Yukon and Yukon XL, and the Cadillac Escalade account for 50% of all large SUV sales in the US. GM makes 340,000 of them every year and exports about 80,000 to 31 countries. They’re made in GM’s plant in Arlington, Texas, which is said to be the most profitable assembly plant in the world. We estimate they generate $20 billion in revenue for GM and about $4 billion in profits. Autoline Daily.
So is the price
7.1 sec 0-60 is f$@%#$ crazy!!! How tire tech and trans tech have come along.
I thought that was a bit slow for the 6.2. The tested a Silverado or Sierra that did it in under 6 seconds before and this is not that much heavier.
Please never retire
Now if Ford throws a Powerstoke diesel from the F150 in the next generation Expedition then I’ll buy that in a heartbeat
The last thing the tahoe needed to be was bigger.I will stick with the old model.
I agree. They made them longer to add room to their third row... but I say, why do these need a third row?? Suburban and Yukon XL have plenty of third row room. I love my 2020 yukon because I can fit it into my garage, you can't do that with the newest model.
I remember when you could buy a 3/4 ton suburban.
A 3/4 ton Suburban with a 454. I wish they would've put the Duramax in the early 2000s Tahoes
I want one of these with a diesel
0-60 in 7.1, are you sure you have the 6.2?
The real question is why does GM need two more models of this exact same vehicle in the GMC and Cadillac brands?
Premium fuel???
Recommended but not required.
*Whew* good to know!
@@cubedtothex meaning you won't get all the ponies out of it
$70k???
Christ you can get a starter house to live in for that price that's outrageous !!
People who own these want room but also the ability to tow serious weight... large campers, boats, etc. Those who have these extras in life can generally afford to pay for a Tahoe/Yukon. If the price looks too high to you, GM isn't catering to you in the first place. And I'm not saying that to be snobby it's just the truth.
If you can find one.Haha!My starter home was 98k.
We’re gonna look back at this from 20 years from now and be like. Dam. We’re 40 now. We’re fucking old as shit 😂
So you're 20? lol... the rest of us will be much older than 40 in 20 years... chill out kid, life keeps going - and gets better with age! ;-)
@@CoryMatthew87 if you say so 😂
@@vegasbab.y3740 I know so, I've lived it! You aren't even close to reaching your peak at age 20. Still figuring out life and wet behind the ears... 😂
@@CoryMatthew87 I’m already figured out. I live on my own and have no car payment again. I buy my own food and pay my bills. I don’t need you to tell me what I am. 😂 have a good day sir.
@@vegasbab.y3740 that's exactly what a 20 year old would say. Too funny! Come back in 10-12 years and re-read your comments. You'll be laughing at yourself. Have a good evening.... :)
Upgrade to 4K cameras
Love watching your videos.
with high country 6.2 litre should be standard
it is
It needs to be so big because you're going to have to live in it...not many people can afford a second mortgage these days.
It doesn't look too bad, but the previous model looked a lot better. The gauges they went 10 steps backwards on, incredibly boring looking. The L87 6.2 is GM's first truck V8 that requires premium now apparently. Also this thing literally has no launch.
I think I'll stick to a GMT800.
Okay, I'm confused. How the hell did you manage the 0 to 60 time @ 7.1 seconds with the 420 horsepower motor?? That model is generally clocked at late 5-second range on its 0 to 60 runs. Unless you got a model with something wrong with the transmission, I think somebody either flubbed something, or you must've tested the 5.3L.
6.2 is the only option for high country trim. High 5 seconds is not very realistic though and 7 seconds is a lot more realistic and I would say even good. The f150 raptor barely breaks 6 seconds and it has more power and torque, a sport suspension, aggressive gear ratios, and is considerably lighter.
No Tahoe has ever done a 5 sec 0-60 time.......
Are you fo real?! 5 seconds
@@OIR339 The Ford Raptor most certainly isn't lighter, even the newer aluminum one's still tip the scales at around 5800lbs.
Motorweeks 0-60 times are slower usually then most other car reviews. Like TFL . Their times are not very accurate to 60mph
Making big SUV and big V8 engine with almost 80k but a smaller gas tank? Really? How can they cut 2 gallons from last generation?
GM SHOULD REPLACE THE 6.2 LITRE WITH THE 6.6 LITRE STD. ON 2500 AND 3500. WHICH BURNS REGULAR.
3:29 - I'll bet that'll be the first thing to fail. Why? Because it's made by GM.
I'll take the 1995 4 door model
50 grand for a base model?? That's insane, I'll definitely never be buying one new that's for sure
Yeah they cost
Can't get around it.Imagine the price for a suburban or even a traverse.
Front side marker light is just lazy design. Boo to that.
24 gallon tank + premium only + 14 mpg = $$$$
Toyota land cruiser price, no thanks and I'm a chevy fan
Sales dont lie though. Tahoes have sold well since their debute in 95, the LandCruiser on the other hand is getting discontinued in the US due to years of poor sales. If they brought a base LC that was equivalent to an LS trim tahoe and didnt have adjustable suspension theyd probably sell much better
Like me, it's ugly from every angle.
You stay that way. The SUV is perfect! Don’t be jealous of it’s gorgeous looks 😉
I personally think that ur sexy (no homo)
blafrican 345 : Your weird.
The entire title of this piece is an oxymoron. 😯
Damn that thing is slow even with the 6.2
Huh? What is with the speed theory? Slow? It damn Tahoe! Not a Ferrari!
Beautiful
over the next few years id like to see. If chevy owners stick around. Premium fuel for your domestic suv! Lexus, acura, nissan, etc i can see but a Tahoe!!
The 6.2L is the only engine that recommends 93 octane. The 5.3L which is very strong will run on regular 87. If you haven't been in a Tahoe in awhile you'd be suprised they are luxury vehicles
@@trewright1482 thank you for the clarification!
Ok what makes the other brands so special? Gas is expensive for all SUVs
In this economy they had better not expect to sell too many.
There's some serious gas spenders out there.Saw someone at a gasl station with a newer Surburban.Wouldve gave anything to see how it cost to fill that monster up!
Way overpriced. Do yourself a favor and buy used save 10s of thousands
Somebody has to buy the new ones so that thier will be used ones in a few years.
@@ohioguy4326 true but let's let the guinea pigs do that for us 😅
Bring back Two door and have suicide door for easy in and out back seat
JFC, this thing is ugly. The best that can be said of it is it's not quite as ugly as the Cadillac or GMC. At least it's quick.
I like it
Many like this model much better than the out going one you sir are the minority that doesn't like it
I agree, it’s hideous. The last gen and Expedition look way better.
@@Lion-dr7uv lol
TheKiltedYaksman1 I wouldn’t go that far, it looks alright.
They need to stop making land boats like this.
I live in ground zero for these rigs Dallas Texas and I see tons of these GM trucks all over the metro here VS POS V6 turbo EXPEDITIONingandNAVIGATORingforarecall Furd POS.
I prefer the V6 Expedition and Navis over the Government Motors POSs all day till Sunday
Carrington Hollister Have fun with those piece of shit cars and all those recalls I know a few people who work at a Ford dealer who would never drive one. One guy in parts dept ended up buying a new Tahoe. Now that was fucking hilarious
sooooo many gadgets
Just think, for $10k more you can just buy an Escalade.
really 60 for a 2021 Escalade
There's nothing premium about escalade either
Giant overpriced weak design
70k for a SUV. No thanks. I will stick with my Impala.
I will stick with my Kia Sportage. $29K
And this is why American’s have no savings.
I stick with my 2010 Tahoe, I’ve bought it for $10k few years ago with 99k miles
CARS REAL BIG
It looks cheap
Faster than ever 👍🏾 yes But they are nothing but a very expensive bunch of plastic that can easily get damage Not like the ones you used to advertise in the 80s 👀Remember 👴 old man????
Let's say I have $70K for a car. I'd better buy 1999 K1500 Suburban LT for $5K. Spend another let's say $30K on restoring it and I'll have a ready-for-everything Suburban for the rest of my life. Simple and very reliable truck. I'd never buy this one. GM spoiled it really bad. Same with Silverado and Tahoe. $70K... In 5 years they'll lose about $25K for nothing. Not to mention new ones are mechanic's attention demanding. Now they require premium gas. Premium gas - 2022 really??? MPG is still not great. For over 22 years they just go only 2-3 miles further on one gallon - so much for improvements. Manufacturers just wanna pull more money out you pockets.
Nice especially it has toyota fog lights, very superior
Que da hora 👏😃👍👍
I hate the new Tahoe and Suburban’s styling. The rear end now looks like a Ford Expedition, all flat assed and the stupid chrome strip across the tailgate looks terrible. GM’s infotainment is horrible too, and the analog gauges look like they belong in 2005. The center stack just looks so cheap. For the kind of money one of these things costs, I would be going for an Audi Q7, BMW X5 or X7, or Mercedes-Benz GLE/GLS. At least all of those vehicles actually look decent outside, have more efficient and powerful engine options and don’t look like they share their interior parts with a $29,000 base model Chevy Silverado 1500 work truck.
Endless money pit - Scott clone.
71k for an interior that's straight up trash🗑️
That machine is a piece of shoe until it has been out in the market for few years and the independent technicians have had time to take it apart and show the world that is still a bipped out product or not
Billionaire dillweeds that own the damn company who cash out what little bit of quality it originally had.
I take a 90s model over this monstrosity any day
Thing is so fugly it looks it fell under a lawnmower...oooofff
It's looks are a mess.
The front end looks plastic.
The side and back are a mish mash.
Blah.
It's not ugly...just weird.
D
That’s a pretty ugly SUV, I guess I’ll stick with my 2010 Tahoe.